The document discusses contracts under Philippine law. It defines a contract as a meeting of minds between two parties where one binds themselves to give or render a service to the other. Contracts require at least two parties. An obligation is the legal tie that exists after a contract is formed. Parties have freedom to contract but contracts cannot violate law, morals, customs or public policy. Innominate contracts have no specific legal name and are regulated based on analogous named contracts and customs.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
46 views10 pages
Module 3 Part1
The document discusses contracts under Philippine law. It defines a contract as a meeting of minds between two parties where one binds themselves to give or render a service to the other. Contracts require at least two parties. An obligation is the legal tie that exists after a contract is formed. Parties have freedom to contract but contracts cannot violate law, morals, customs or public policy. Innominate contracts have no specific legal name and are regulated based on analogous named contracts and customs.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 10
CONTRACTS
ART. 1305. A contract is a
meeting of minds between two persons whereby one binds himself, with respect to the other, to give something or to render some service. Meaning of contracts
The above article gives the definition of contract.
It lays emphasis on the meeting of minds between two contracting parties which takes place when an offer by one party is accepted by the other. In a contract, one or more persons bind himself or themselves with respect to another or others, or reciprocally, to the fulfillment of a prestation to give, to do, or not to do. In a contract, there must be at least two persons or parties, because it is impossible for one to contract with himself. Contract and obligation distinguished. Contract is one of the sources of obligations. On the other hand, obligation is the legal tie or relation itself that exists after a contract has been entered into. Hence, there can be no contract if there is no obligation. But an obligation may exists without a contract. ART. 1306. The contracting parties may established such stipulations, clauses, terms and conditions as they may deem convenient, provided they are not contrary to law, morals, good customs, public order, or public policy. Freedom to contract guaranteed The right to enter into contract is one of the liberties guaranteed to the individual by the Constitution. However, the constitutional prohibition against the impairment of contractual obligations refers only to legally valid contracts. In appropriate cases, it cannot be invoked as against the right of the state to exercise its police power. In other words, an individual does not have an absolute right to enter into any kind of contract. However, because the freedom of contract is both a constitutional and statutory right, to uphold the right courts are enjoined to move with the necessary caution and prudence in holding contracts void. ART. 1307. Innominate contracts shall be regulated by the stipulation of the parties, by the provisions of the Titles I and II of this Book, by the rules governing the most analogous nominate contracts and by the customs of the place. Classification of contracts according to its name or designation 1. Nominate contract or that which has a specific name or designation in law (e.g., commodatum, lease, agency, sale, etc.).
2. Innominate contract or that which
has no specific name or designation in law. Kinds of Innominate contract 1. Do ut des (I give that you may give) 2. Do ut facias (I give that you may do) 3. Facto ut des ( I do that you may give) 4. Facto ut facias (I do that you may do)
Do ut des is, however, no longer an
innominate contract. It has already been given a name of its own, i.e., barter or exchange. Reasons for innominate contracts The impossibility of anticipating all forms of agreement on one hand, and the progress of man’s sociological and economic relationships on the other, justify this provision. A contract will not, therefore, be considered invalid for failure to conform strictly to the standard contracts outlined in the Civil Code. It is sufficient that it has all the elements of a valid contract.
Law School Survival Guide (Volume I of II) - Outlines and Case Summaries for Torts, Civil Procedure, Property, Contracts & Sales: Law School Survival Guides