0% found this document useful (0 votes)
172 views5 pages

Criminal Procedure-Syllabus 3.12.14 PM

This document outlines the syllabus for a Criminal Procedure course at San Beda College School of Law. It covers various rules related to the prosecution of offenses and civil actions arising from criminal cases. The rules discuss topics like jurisdiction, prescription periods, complaints versus informations, authority to prosecute, amendment/substitution of charges, and venue. It also outlines key points about preliminary investigations, arrests, and related Supreme Court cases. The document provides law students an overview of the scope and content that will be covered during the Criminal Procedure course.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
172 views5 pages

Criminal Procedure-Syllabus 3.12.14 PM

This document outlines the syllabus for a Criminal Procedure course at San Beda College School of Law. It covers various rules related to the prosecution of offenses and civil actions arising from criminal cases. The rules discuss topics like jurisdiction, prescription periods, complaints versus informations, authority to prosecute, amendment/substitution of charges, and venue. It also outlines key points about preliminary investigations, arrests, and related Supreme Court cases. The document provides law students an overview of the scope and content that will be covered during the Criminal Procedure course.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 5

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE

SAN BEDA COLLEGE-ALABANG


School of Law
1 Semester, AY: 2022-2023
st

Thursday, 6:30 P.M.-9:30 P.M.


RULE 11O
JUDGE XERXES U. GARCIA Prosecution of
Offenses

A. Institution of Criminal Action

I. Jurisdiction

a. Over the Subject Matter

i. Ricardo Atienza vs. People, G.R. No. 188694, February 12, 2014
(726 Phil. 570);
ii. Tijam vs. Sibonghanoy, G.R. No. L-21450, April 15, 1968;
iii. People vs. Sandiganbayan, G.R. No. 169004, September 5, 2010;

b. Over the Person of the Accused

i. Gina Villa Gomez vs. People, G.R. No. 216824, November 10,
2020;
ii. Jose Miranda, et al. vs. Tuliao, G.R. No. 158763, March 31, 2006
(520 Phil. 907);
iii. Mario Verdiano vs. People, G.R. No. 200370, June 7, 2017 (810
Phil. 642);

c. Over the Territory

i. Hector Treñas vs. People, G.R. No. 195002, January 25, 2012 (680
Phil. 368);
ii. Raffy Brodeth, et al. vs. People, G.R. No. 197849, November 29,
2017;
iii. Allen Macasaet, et al. vs. People, G.R. No. 156747, February 23,
2005;
iv. Raul Francis Cabral vs. Chris Bracamonte, G.R. No. 233174,
January 23, 2019

II. Prescription

i. Luis Panaguiton vs. DOJ, et al., G.R. No. 167571, November 25,
2008;
ii. Jadewell Barking System vs. Lidea, G.R. No. 169588, October 7,
2013;

III. Complaint vs. Information

a. Ampatuan, Jr. vs. De Lima, G.R. No. 197291, April 3, 2013;


b. People vs. Delfin, G.R. No. 201572, July 9, 2014;
c. People vs. XXX, G.R. No. 229836, July 17, 2019;
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
San Beda College, School of Law Page 2
1st Semester, AY:2022-2023

d. People vs. Delector, G.R. No. 200026, October 4, 2017;


e. People vs. Dasmariñas, G.R. No. 203986, October 4, 2017;
f. People vs. Solar, G.R. No. 225595, August 6, 2019;
g. Villarba vs. CA, G.R. No. 227777, June 15, 2020

IV. Authority to Prosecute

a. A.M. No. 02-2-07-SC effective May 1, 2002;


b. Heirs of Sarah Marie Palma Burgos vs. Court of Appeals, G.R.
No. 169711, February 8, 2010;
c. Laude vs. Ginez-Jabalde, G.R. No. 217456, November 24,
2015;
d. Yokohama Tires Philippines, Inc. vs. Reyes, G.R. No. 236686,
February 5, 2020;

V. Duplicity of the Offense

a. Pp. vs. Leo Quemeggen, et al., G.R. No. 178205, July 27, 2009;
b. People vs. Brioso, G.R. No. 209344, June 27, 2016;
c. People vs. VVV, G.R. No. 230222, June 22, 2020;

VI. Amendment or Substitution

a. Pacoy vs. Cajigal, G.R. No. 157472, September 28, 2007;


b. Mayor Anwar Balindong, et al. vs. CA, G.R. No. 177600,
October 19, 2015;
c. Omar Villarbas vs. CA and Pp., G.R. No. 227777, June 15,
2020;
d. Quiambao vs. People, G.R. No. 195957. January 15, 2020;

VII. Venue

i. Joshua Casanas vs. People, G.R. No. 223833, December 11, 2017;
ii. Hector Treñas vs. People, G.R. No. 195002, January 25, 2012;

RULE 111
Prosecution of Civil Action

I. Criminal Action vs. Civil Action; purpose

II. Implied institution of civil actions arising from delict vs. Institution of civil actions
from other sources of obligation.

a. Philippine Rabbit Bus Lines, Inc. vs. People, G.R. No. 147703, April 14, 2004;
b. Gosiaco vs. Ching, G.R. No. 173807, April 16, 2009;
c. Naguiat vs. Intermediate Appellate Court, G.R. No. 73836, August 18, 1988;
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
San Beda College, School of Law Page 3
1st Semester, AY:2022-2023

d. Tactaquin vs. Palileo, G.R. No. L-20865, December 29, 1967;


e. Sps. Lo Bun Tiong vs. Balboa, G.R. No. 158177, January 28, 2008;
f. Republic vs. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 116463;

III. Modes by which civil liability ex-delicto may be enforced.

a. Co vs. Muñoz, Jr., G.R. No. 181986, December 4, 2013;

IV. Primacy of Criminal Action; exceptions:

a. Republic vs. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 116463


b. Alano vs. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 11244, December 15, 1997;

V. Extinguishment of the penal action, effect;

a. Estate of Poblador, Jr. vs. Manzano, G.R. No. 192391, June 19, 2017;
b. Ching vs. Nicdao, G.R. No. 141181, April 27, 2007;
c. People vs. Antido, G.R. No. 208651, March 14, 2018;
d. Dy vs. People, G.R. No. 189081, August 10, 2016;
e. Roman Garces vs. Hernandez, G.R. No. 180761, August 9, 2010;
f. Romero vs. People, G.R. No. 167546, July 17, 2009;

VI. Prejudicial Question; meaning; elements.

a. Arellano vs. Gatdula, G.R. No. 212215, October 9, 2019;


b. Jose vs. Saurez, G.R. No. 176795, June 30, 2008;
c. Capili vs. People, G.R. No. 183805, July 3, 2013;
d. People vs. Arambulo, G.R. No. 186597, July 17, 2015;

RULE 112
Preliminary Investigation

I. Preliminary Investigation, defined; when required;


II. Purposes of Preliminary Investigation;
III. Preliminary Investigation as Statutory Right;
IV. Procedure in conducting preliminary investigation;
V. Quantum of evidence in preliminary investigation;
VI. Probable Cause defined;
VII. Probable Cause as Executive Function vs. Probable Cause as Judicial Function;
VIII. Authority of the Executive to Prosecute vs. Authority of the Court to Dismiss Cases;
IX. Authority of the Secretary of Justice to affirm, reverse and modify resolutions;
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
San Beda College, School of Law Page 4
1st Semester, AY:2022-2023

Cases:

1. Masayuki Hasegawa vs. Leila Giron, G.R. No. 184536, August 14, 2013;
2. Callo-Claridad vs. Esteban, G.R. No. 191567, March 20, 2013;
3. Saturnino Ocampo, et al. vs. Abando, et al., G.R. No. 176830, February 11, 2014;
4. Rodrigo Duterte vs. De Guzman, G.R. No. 130191, April 27, 1998;
5. People of the Phils. vs. Borje, et al., G.R. No. 170046, December 10, 2014;
6. People of the Phils. vs. Hon. Basilio Gabo, et al., G.R. No. 161083;
7. Borlongan, et al. vs. Peña, et al., G.R. No. 143591, May 5, 2010;
8. People of the Phils. vs. Engr. Rodolfo Yecyec, et al., G.R. No. 183551, November 12 2014;
9. Mario Crespo vs. Hon. Leodegario Mogul, G.R. No. L-53373, June 30, 1987;
10. Barry Lanier vs. People of the Phils., G.R. No. 189176, March 19, 2014;
11. Cajipe vs. People of the Phils., G.R. No. 203605, April 23, 2014;
12. Winston Fenix, et al. vs. People of the Phils., G.R. No. 189878, July 11, 2016;
13. Delos Santos-Dio vs. Caguioa, G.R. No. 178947, June 26, 2013

RULE 113
Arrest

I. Arrest; definition; purpose;


II. Section 2, Article III of the Constitution;
III. Requisites for the Issuance of a Warrant of Arrest (WA);
IV. Probable Cause of the Issuance of a WA;
V. Methods of Arrest; with WA; without WA, by a peace officer; by a private citizen;
VI. Rules on the Use of Body-worn Cameras in the Execution of Warrants
VII. Instances of a valid warrantless arrests;
VIII. What is “In Flagrante Delicto” arrest?
IX. What is “Hot Pursuit” arrest?
X. Republic Act No. 7438 (An Act Defining Certain Rights of Person Arrested, Detained
or Under Custodial Investigation, etc.)
XI. Effects of Invalid Arrest;
XII. What is search incidental to a lawful arrest?

Cases:
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
San Beda College, School of Law Page 5
1st Semester, AY:2022-2023

1. Luz vs. People of the Philippines, G.R. No. 197788, February 29, 2012;
2. Ocampo vs. Abando, G.R. No. 176830, February 11, 2014;
3. People of the Philippines vs. Collado, G.R. No. 185719, June 17, 2013;
4. People of the Philippines vs. Cogaed, G.R. No. 200334, July 30, 2014;
5. People of the Philippines vs. Sapla, G.R. No. 244045, June 16, 2020;
6. Villasana vs. People of the Philippines, G.R. No. 209078, September 4, 2019;
7. People of the Philippines vs. Andaya, G.R. No. 183700, October 13, 2014;
8. People of the Philippines vs. Villareal, G.R. No. 201363, March 18,2013;
9. People of the Philippines vs. Edaño, G.R. No. 188133, July 7, 2014;
10. Comerciante vs. People of the Philippines, G.R. No. 205926, July 22, 2015;
11. Pestilo, et al. vs. Generoso, G.R. No. 182601, November 10, 2014;
12. Judge Abelita III vs. Doria, G.R. No. 170672, August 14, 2009;
13. Luspo vs. People of the Philippines, G.R. No. 188487, October 22, 2014;
14. People of the Philippines vs. Chavez, G.R. No. 207950, September 22, 2014;
15. Verdiano vs. People of the Philippines, G.R. No. 200370, June 7, 2017;
16. People of the Philippines vs. Yau, G.R. No. 208170, August 20, 2014;
17. Dela Cruz vs. People of the Philippines, G.R. No. 200784, July 23, 2014;
18. People of the Philippines vs. Calantiao, G.R. No. 203984, June 18, 2014;
19. Homar vs. People of the Philippines, G.R. No. 182534, September 2, 2015.

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy