Cephalopods Processing
Cephalopods Processing
e SCS/DEV/76/16
ISBN 92-852-1007-4
FAO 1977
SCS/DEV /76/16 iii
During the first quarter of 1975 9 the Asian Development Bank explored
with the FAO~ through the South China Sea Fisheries Development and Coordina-
ting Programme~ the possibilities of collaborating in undertaking a study
that would assist the Bank and its developing member countries in formulating
investment programmes that focus essentially on high-value~ export-oriented
fishery products. During the third quarter of 1975 9 terms of reference for
the study were developed with the participation of the ADB staff 9 the South
China Sea Programme and FAO Headquarters staff. It was agreed that the
study would be coordinated by the South China Sea Programme 9 in close colla-
boration with FAO Headquarters and the Indian Ocean Programme 9 drawing for
assistance selected staff of the FAO Headquarters Policy and Planning Unit~
the Industries Division and the InQ.ian'Dcean Programme. Several independent
consultants were engaged by the South China Sea Programme to carry out
portions of the study.
The main objectives of the study were to analyze the present market
situation and projected future absorptive capacity for high-value species
of fish; especially tuna and shrimp~ in the major importing countries~ and
to compare projected market needs with present exports from developing
member countries 9 to assess the potential for expansion of exports from
these countries~ and to enable the Bank and its member countries to utilize
the findings of the study in the planning of future investments in fisheries
production facilities within the region. The detailed terms of reference
of the study are attached in Appendix A of the main report document.
The study was carried out under the interim arrangements of ADB/FAO
Cooperative Action which provides a vehicle for cooperative activities on
a cost sharing basis.
The coordination of the study was carried out by the SCSP and parti-
cularly Mr. K. J. Rosenberg~ Senior Economist~ supported by staff member
Mr. B. V. Lanier. Editing assistance was given by the staff of the South
China Sea Programme~ as well as by Dr. A. Labon of the Indian Ocean
Programme who also was responsible for preparing the summary and profiles
of the IOP countries. Further aid in technical editing of all the documents
was provided by the staff of the Fishery Industry Division and the Policy
and Planning Unit of FAO Department of Fisheries in Rome.
SCS/DEV/76/16 iv
I. INTRODUCTION 1
III. UTILIZATION 18
A. General Considerations 18
B. National Trends 21
A. General Considerations 27
B. National Trends 27
v. CONSUMPTION 36
APPENDIXES 60
STATISTICAL ANNEXES 76
REFERENCES 92
LIST OF TABLES
Table No"
I., INTRODUCTION
-
L f ,,.
repor~ ~
! .,
epna.Y..opo speci. f.i.ca.L.ly to
d s && re:i::ers
.IC • "\1 ~ -
0 WORLD PRODUCTION
WORLD TOTAL 635 862 836 979 1 216 1 019 976 1 004 1 121 1 073 1 070
-- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - -
Squid 444 609 596 689 920 742 720 719 799 755 742
Cuttlefish 85 101 91 106 104 104 93 119 116 139 137
Octopus 106 153 148 184 192 173 163 166 206 178 191
3 4 5
AFRICA - -4 -4 - 5 5 4 4 5 9
NORTH AMERICA 19 17 15 18 13 11 12 17 10 7 13
-
Canada 11 8 5 7 - 0 0 2 - 1 0
U.S.A. 8 9 10 11 13 11 12 15 10 6 13
8
LATIN AMERICA
-5 -3 -6 - -8 -6 -6 -8 -10 -10 12 I
-
ASIA 514 682 668 793 1 043 815 801 726 851 783 782 +:-
-- -- -- -- - - -- -- -- -- -- -
Japan 397 579 551 695 877 683 616 569 668 550 557
Korea, Rep. of 88 72 78 45 93 68 78 53 66 74 73
Philippines 8 10 11 10 18 13 13 13 8 16 21
S.Viet-Nam, Rep. of 5 5 5 5 3 4 9 15 11 13 13
Thailand ... . .. ... 20 30 25 60 51 65 81 69
EUROPE
-94 -150 139
-- 148
-- -141 166
-- 147
-- 220
-- 222
-- -238 223
-
France 2 4 4 4 4 6 8 13 9 14 9
Italy 28 30 32 31 31 38 34 34 36 36 39
Spain 54 91 92 100 94 111 94 164 160 164 162
U.S.S.R. - 6 4 8 6 16 5 29 23 30 26
Tli.e a
constant catch of cephalopods;J) averaging ~ tons per
ar~Tum in the last ten years. The Todarodes pa.cificus
far the most important quantity terms.
There seems to however" a declining tremd in its 10<rc.i=
cuiet:ion, due probably to u.nfavorable hydrographic
time to ~ Korean s share the
g~o-unds Sea of
of T. pacificus of
Since 1971
resaur~es
:::epres
developments
cc.:~cli.es
from
has "'varied
personal
1973 s~cern ~ralinllers -oegarn.
tli.e r~o:rcth~17est
, a catch of
The catch of C--v~·n-•<S.."'-" represented 8 per
~ 1 ·1. t:a.lian :tJ..sh proctuct1.on
..?. ,:- ~
cen:a: or: ccita
,- ,.(l ,_ !\.. ..,,
tei--ms of quantity
fP ., • •\
production of cephalopods is
of the order of 5 s to 6, tons per annum,
cuttlefish accounting for about half of ·the totalo Squid
a~e not separately identified species is estimated
are species taken.
U.S catch of
o
Northwest Atlantic
Northeast Atlantic
.. ----19651966 1967 1968 1969 1970 1971 1972 1973 1974 Est. potential- Status of
'OOO tons live weight tons exploitation
several 1/ just
Atlantic NW 9.5 6.8 9,5 5.4 6.1 15.5 27.6 40.0 65.l 49. 8 hundred beginning
thousand
several virtually un-
NE 52.0 37.7 40.l 36.0 36.3 41.5 46.9 35.6 28.3 21.6 hundred exploited ex-
thousand cept locally
we 1.1 1.8 2.5 3.1 2.8 2.1 3,5 5.6 4.3 5.9 0.5-1 mill. ditto
EC 122,8 110.5 155.5 155.6 173.9 138,0 184.3 183.3 203.7 222.0 200 OOO overexploited
SW 1.5 3.3 4.5 5.5 1.8 2.3 2.6 2.5 5.0 5.7 500 OOO underexploited
several
SE 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 2.0 1.7 1.2 1.5 1.6 4.8 hundred underexploited
thousand
Mediterranean considerably
and Black Sea
43.7 46.5 46.8 47.l 47.4 43,8 42.9 48.1 41.3 44.4 100 OOO
exploited ,,_,
,,_,
Indian W 0.4 0.4 4.6 4.0 4.5 3.4 4,9 7.3 6.2 6' 8~
200 OOO underexploited O
E ~.l 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0,3 0.2 0.2 0.2~
very heavily
Pacific NW 606,4 600.7 668.9 893,6 688.9 629.8 591.7 699.0 580.4 567. 4 l million
exploited
hundreds of
NE 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.3
thousands unexploited
considerably
we 15.7 17.4 36.1 53.5 44.l 85.4 82.6 87.5 115.4 111. 7 100 OOO 2/
exploited
EC 8.5 8.9 9.0 11.3 9.7 11.3 14.6 9.3 4.6 10.7 600 OOO underexploited
SW 0.2 15.l 18.6 3/400 OOO just beginning
SE 0.4 1.2 0.7 0.6 0.9 0.8 0.9 0.7 1.1 0.1 500 OOO unexploited
Total 862.3 835.6 978.7 1216.2 1018.9 975.8 1004.0 1120.9 1072.7 1070.0
rrEsti!nated potential of squid alone. 2! Potential yield of
cephalopods in the Gulf of Thailand alone. ·~
Source of annual catches: F'AO Yearbooks of Fisher•y Statistics -~ Catches and Landings Series.
Source of estimated potential yield and status of exploi·tation: 11 The Fish Resources of the Ocean 11 by Gulland 9 1972;
11
Cephalopod Resour'ces of the Wor•ld 11 by Voss, 1973; and "Exploitation of Cephalopod Rcsou:cces ;:md
Their.' Utilization" by Hamabe, 1975.
= 12 -
35. The main fishing area lies on the Saharan Bank off
the former Spanish Sahara and ~lauritania; in the area to
the south of this, down to the mouth of the Congo River~
cephalopods are much less abundant. The main cephalopod
stocks in the northern area are already over=fished and a.
recent (February 197 Working Party concluded that the
maximum equilibrium yield for all cephalopods would be
obtained with a fishing effort some per cent below the
197L.~ level ..
Southwest Atlantic
Indian Ocean
Northeast Pacific
Southwest Pacific
Southeast Pacific
Area Summary
III. UTILIZATION
1
000 tons live wei~ht
Korea Thai- Philip-
Japan Spain Italy USSR Others Total
Rep. land pines
Production
1969 682.8 110.6 67.6 24,5 37.8 16.2 13.1 66.3 1 018.9
1970 615.6 93.8 78.l 59.9 33.7 4.6 12.5 '17. 6 975 .8
1971 568.5 163.7 52.5 50.6 33.7 28.5 12.7 93.8 l 004.0
1972 068.4 160.0 66.3 65.2 35,9 23.2 7.5 94.4 l 120.9
1973 550.l 163.7 73.9 81.4 35.9 29.8 15.5 122.4 1 072. 7
1974 556.9 1-61. 8 72.6 69.4 39.0 26.l 21.4 122.8 l 070.D
Fresh
-
306.4
1969
1970
77. 7
121.6
72.1
61. 7
29.1
16.6
15,0
33.3
'.29 • 2
29.7
16.2
4.6
12.5
11.9
54.5
64.4 343.8 ...
\0
1971 135.6 80.9 15.6 20.0 28,7 28.5 7.9 75.4 3~2.6
1972 41. 7 69.9 49.8 18.9 32.9 23.2 1.2 82.l 319.7
1973 21.3 81.4 43.3 25.7 31.2 29.8 9.4 114.4 356.5
1974 35.0 79.3 33.3 21. 7 33.9 26.l 12.7 106.8 348.8
Freezing
1969 285~9 31.9 2.5 0.9 8,6 - - 2.0 331.8
1970 203.5 26.0 5.0 4.3 lf.0 - - 3.6 246.4
1971 196.8 75.4 8.5 6.8 5.0 - - 1.1 293.6
1972 342.l 82.7 3.3 14.2 3.0 - - 0.9 446.2
1973 221.5 75.5 5.8 15.4 4.7 - - 1.4 324.3
1974 224.4 75.6 12.7 15.0 5.1 - - 3.0 335.8
Cur in£
1969 84.9 - 32.0 7.8 - - 0.6 0.8 126.1
1970 58.l - 53.0 20.5 - - 0.6 1.0 133.2
1971 42 .Lf - 25.2 22.3 - 0.6 2.9 93, Ll
1972 67.7 - 10.0 28.7 - - 0.6 1.5 108.5
1973 59.6 - 21.6 35.9 - - 0.6 l. 7 119.4
1974 50.8 - 23.6 30.6 - - 1.0 2.9 108.9
Canning
1969 11.6 6,6 0.9 - - - - 4. 7 23.8
1970 9.7 6.1 0.7 - - - - 4.0 20,5
1971 1.5 7.4 0,4 - - - - 8.1 17.4
1972 8.2 7.4 0.4 - - - - 4.7 20.7
1973 5.8 6.8 0.4 - - - - 0.7 13.7
197lJ. 2.7 6.9 0.2 - - - - 4.7 14.5
Preparations
1969 192.7 - - - - - - 192.7
1970 192.7 - - - - - - - 192.7
1971 162.2 - - - - - 4.2 - 166.4
1972 178.7 - - L.4 - - 5.7 - 185.8
1973 211. 9 - - 2.0 - - 5.5 - 219.4
1 q74 214.0 - - - - - 7.7 - 221.7
Reduction or
Feed N
-- 0
19b9 - - 3.1 0.7 - - - - 3,8
1970 - - 2.8 1.8 - - - - 4.6
1971 - - 2.8 1. 5 - - - - 4.3
1972 - - 2.8 2.0 - - - - 4.8
1973 - - 2.8 2.4 - - - - 5.2
1974 - - 2.8 2.1 - - - - 4,9
Bait
-
1969 30.0 - - - - - - 4.3 34.3
1970 30.0 - - - - - - 4.6 34.6
1971 30.0 - - - - - - 6.3 36.3
1972 30.0 - - - - - - 5.2 35.2
1973 30.0 - - - - - - 4.2 34.2
1974 30.0 - - - - - - 5.4 35.4
B. National Trends
P r o c e s s e d
Fresh Salted Sa1 tedJ Total
Total and Pre par- fer- salted pro-
Year catch frozen Dried Smoked at ions mented Canned dried cessed I Bait
Tons live weight equivalent
1969 544 100 224 966 72 535 2 636 192 745 8 792 11 560 866 289 134 30 OOO
1970 487 600 197 141 44 452 l 984 192 695 10 690 9 689 949 260 459 30 OOO
1971 446 600 210 596 31 824 l 068 162 195 8 463 1 505 949 206 004 30 OOO
1972 561 300 276 815 52 329 1 196 178 650 13 160 8 201 949 254 485 30 OOO
1973 450 400 143 093 43 476 2 836 211 944 12 296 5 806 949 '1:77 307 30 OOO
N
N
.t'ercenta~
1969 100.0 41.4 13.3 0.5 35.4 1.6 2.1 0.2 53.l 5.5
1970 100.0 40.4 9.1 0.4 39.5 2.2 2.0 0.2 53.4 I 6.2
I
1971 100.0 47.2 7.1 0.2 36.4 1.9 0.3 0.2 46.l 6.7
1972 100.0 49.3 9.3 0.2 31.8 2.3 1.5 0.2 45.3 5.4
1973 100.0 31.8 9.6 0.6 47.l 2.7 1.3 0.2 61. 5 6.7
Source: Annual Reports on Marketing of Fishery Products, Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, Japan
and FAO Yearbooks of Fishery Statistics - Fishery Commodities Series
- 23 -
67" In the UoS . . F10 up u111.til the late sixties abciut: 1-:al:i:
of total California squid landings were normal canned fc:c
. t't1 ~' .• h
,..
exporL, h.,ut
wl. d1.e recen t o"-owc
O'if"
0.:1.. a -1'oca 1.l. o.arKeL
.IC ' J..
ccnis
•• "
B. National Trends
Table 6
Argentina 1. 6 2.4 1. 6 1. 8
Brazil 0.8 0.5 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7
France 2.9 3.4 6.0 5.8
Greece 2.5 2.5 3.1 3.0 3.1 3.4
Italy 16.7 15.5 25.8 14.5
Japan 42.8 51.5 83.9 91.9 83.9 113.0
ivialaysia 0 .:;!. 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1
Mauritania 2.0 8.4 11.9 8.6
Portugal 1.2 1.8 1.8 1.8
Spain 6.7 10.6 20.0 28.4 33.6
Thailand 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.1
Canned 8.6 8.4 8.3 10.8 11.3 8.6
Greece 3.3 2.7 3.2 2.9 2.4 2.4
Japan 0.7 2.1 2.8 4.5 7.1 6.2
Malaysia 0.6 1.2 0.2 0.1
Philippines 4.0 2.4 2.1 3.3 1.8
1
000 tons ;eroduct weight
1969 1970 1971 1972 1973 1974-
15. Over the past six years unit import values for
cephalopods have risen in a striking manner. In 1969 the
average import value of octopus was only US$0.25 per kg., but
it quadrupled to reach $le00 per kg. in 1974; squid rose
from US$0.39 to $lo40 per kg. in the same periodo Nevertheless~
cephalopods are still lower in price compared with other high
grade fish items such as shrimp, which was valued at nearly
US$4.00 per kg. in 1974.
Table 8
Japan - Imports and Exports of Cephalopods~ 1969-~
Fresh, frozen 44.7 50.8 85.7 91. 7 83.l 112.5 10.7 21.6 48.4 53.3 72.2 133.9
- - - - - - - - - - -- - - -- - - -- - -
Squid and cuttlefish 8.5 15.2 21.3 27.8 29.0 44.8 3.3 11.0 15.6 21.0 30.0 63.0
Octopus 36.2 35.6 54.. 4 63.9 54.l 67.7 7 • L) 10.6 32.8 32.4 42.2 70.9
Salted or dried
Squid and cuttlefish - 2.2 1.2 1.3 0.8 0.6 I - :3 .1 1. 9 2.4 1. 7 1.9
Preparations
Squid and cuttlefish 0.7 2.0 2.8 4.5 7.1 6.2 I 0.8 3.8 6.4 11.0 20.2 27.2
EXPORTS w
1-4
Fresh, frozen 16.5 23.6 23.9 33.7 35.7 25.9 7.1 13.6 11.6 17.9 23.5 18.4
-- - - -- -- -- -- - -- -- -- - - - -
Squid frozen 15.1 22.4 20.5 25.7 25.7 17.8 6,5 12.6 9.3 13.0 17.2 14, l}
Octopus L4 1.2 3.4 8.0 10.0 8.1 0.6 1.0 2.3 4.9 6.3 4.0
Dried
-
Squid 0.5 o.o 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 I 0.4 0.1 o.o o.o 0.0 0.1
Salted
Squid o.o o.o o.o o.o 0.0 0.0 I 0.0 0.0 o.o o.o o.o o.o
Canned
- --
Squid 2.2 2.5 0.3 0.2 0.5 0.2 I 1.0 1.4 0.2 0.2 0.5 0.3
squid rose from l~OO tons ~i...n 1969 to nearly 16~000 tons in 197t:;
fr::izen.. octopus sales to Japan also increased markedly over
'che same period (from 200 tons tc 8 ~OOO tons) o i,n a.dd!:ticn to
:rrozen squia.~
,... ~
wnicn :n.n va1ue ·i:erms rank~s secon~,
0 , " • • ,.:ill or,... a 11
.• J..
Korean £ish product exports~ Korea also exports dried, salted~
canned and prepared squid products as well as octopus0 Exports
cf special squid preparations have risen particularly rapidly
in =ecent yea=s while dried squid e1;;:ports have fallen~ ref-
~ ,,_. 1- ' • "'""h 1 • ,
.Lec:;..J.ng -.renas :.n c.. ••·e ..iiapanese me.:r:cec., ...,a.nneG. squic expor:;..s
!{"' " • " ,,_
also have eA-panded but sa:turat:ioL1 point. for this prcd-uct n.ow
s ee..'\ilS near c
V" CONSlJ1'1PTION
cephalopod catch is
~ together the Repub lie of
Korea and other Far Eastern countries accounts for nearly
£our~ of t:he remain-
0
:ing
countries; in absolute and
pe~ capita telrnlSo the Mediterranean
coun:tries the , tons per annUlllo
ElsevhAere~ cephalopod consurniption appears to be negligible~
71Ji ·t11-e e:;g:cep~t:ton of L~tin Am.erican countries.
v '! ...,
z: resn ~ pacll.<.agea
"1
fairly available in Mexico
and \1arious cephalopods are said t:o be quite commonly eaten
in the West Indieso Venezuela the consumption of fresh
of a Squ.id Fishery
- 37 =
Table 9
WESTERN EUROPE
France
Production 6.1 8.0 12.5 9.1 13.8 8.8
Imports 1. 7 2.3 2.9 3.4 6.0 5.8
Exports 0.2 0.7 4.8 2.3 6.0 3.5
Total supply 7.5 9.6 10.6 10.2 13.8 11.1
Greece
Production 7.1 5.4 6. '+ 5.4 5.4 5.4
Imports 7.4 6.0 7.4 6.8 5.4 6.7
Exports 1. 3 2.5 3.5 4.6 1. 9 2.2
To-t:al supply 13.2 8.9 10.3 7.6 8.9 9.9
Italy
Production 37.8 33.7 33.2 35.9 36.9 39.o
Imports 5.3 10.4 16.7 15.5 25.8 14.5
Exports 0.2 0.4 1. 7 2.9 1. 7 2.9
Total supply 42.9 43.7 48.2 48.5 61.0 50.6
Portugal
Production 3.6 4.0 4.2 4.5 4.2 s.1
Imports
Exports 3.1 3.1 2.1 2.3 3.2 3.2
Total supply 0.5 0.9 2.1 2.2 1.0 1. 9
Spain
Production 110.6 93.8 163.7 160.0 163.8 161. 8
Imports 0.8 5.1 12.3 20.0 28.4 33.6
Exports 18.9 34.4 52.6 77.4 53.0 65.7
Total supply 92.5 64.5 123.4 102.6 139.2 129.7
ASIA
Hong Kong
Production 4.4 4.3 3.7 4.7 4.1 4.4
Imports 3.3 2.9 3.7 3.1 3.8 5.4
Exports 0.9 0.6 1.0 0.9 0.9 2.5
Total supply 6.8 6.6 6.4 6.9 7.0 7.3
Japan
Production 682.8 615.6 568.5 668.3 550.1 556.9
Imports 43.9 61.4 91.9 102.8 97.4 124.5
Exports 19.1 26.1 23.5 33.8 36.4 26.3
Total supply Y 677.6 620.9 606.9 707.3 581.1 625.1
Korea, Rep. of
Philippines
Production 13.1 12.5 12.7 7.5 15.5 21.4
Imports 6.7 4.0 3.5 5.5 3.0 2.0
Exports
Total supply 19.8 16.5 16.2 13.0 18.5 23.Ll
Thailand
Production 24.5 50.9 50.6 65.2 81.4 69.4
Imports 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.1
Exports 0.4 2.9 6.2 20.6 19.7 15.2
2/
Total supply- 24.5 57.2 44.6 44.9 61. 9 54.3
SOUTH AMERICA
Argentina
Production 1.2 2.0 2.6 2.3 4.7 5.1
Imports 2.0 2.6 1. 8 1. 8 1.4 1.4
Exports
Total supply 4.3 4.6 4.4 4.1 6.1 6.5
Mexico
Production 2.4 1. 7 2.6 3.9 2.0 3.5
Imports
Exports 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1
Total supply 2.3 1. 7 2.6 3.8 1. 9 3.4
Venezuela
Production 0.6 0.5 1.2 1. 9 2.3 3.6
Imports
Exports
Total supply 0.6 0.5 1. 2 1.9 2.3 3.6
Table 10
kg live weight
Western Europe
Asia
Latin America
"\
9()0 9.0
\
\
\ -~- .....
\ ./
800 ( 8.5
\
\ I ""
\ I \
\ I \
700 I 80
\ \
\
\
I
I ·\.--·/'\
f "'·'
600
\ /
)
I,
\
~
I "" 7 5
\,./
\
\
"'
c
500
\_- 7.0
"'<?>
E
E E
0 E'.
O'
0 0
0
~
400 6.5
300- 6.0
_,,__ --si---©---""'---e/ //
/
e---4>
200 -I ~-......
...... ® _ _ _ ...s_
__ o____
I
100 ~ 5.0
squid purchased by one household (kg)
total. catch of squid (tons)
@------@ squid purchased by al.l households (tona)
I
o_._~~___,-....___,____,___,~...-~....-~--.--___,_,....,~_,..~___,___,~...-~....-___,-.-~_.,
1963 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74
Japanese Annual Consumption of Cephalopods by Type of Product and Income GroupJ_ 1973
Fresh Squid
(including
Octopus Dried Squid Smoked Squid
Income Range by Group cuttlefish)
1
000 Yen
Expend- Quan- Expend- Quan~ Expend- Quan- Expend- Quan-
Per Year
iture tity iture tity iture tity iture tity
Group I <(1 137 3 037 63 659 961 13 647 395 2 934 432 3 163
~
"8
G1".-up II 1 137 t--J 1 486 3 598 75 277 1 049 llf 519 522 0 744 597 4 17Li
Group III 1 486,,,.,,, 1 870 3 922 80 993 1 174 15 505 494 3 703 651 4 419
Group IV 1 870 ~ 2 500 3 977 79 558 1 196 15 608 520 3 672 677 4 799
Group V ')2 500 4 531 84 906 1 397 17 453 505 3 725 682 4 474
Source: Annual Report of the Family and Expenditure Survey, 1973, Office of the Prime Minister, Japan.
- 48 -
H. MACKEREL
350
DRIED SQUID
300
• FRESH SOU!D
®
·'=
a.
c 250
""0"' SAURY
,_
<!\)
u
c •
<l.l
O>
0 200 SEA BREAM SARDINE FERMENTED
c:
<:I> • • 9 BEEF •
SALTED SQUID
~
CJ
0...
TUNA YELLOW TAIL
150 •
OCTOPUS
•
as for general~
factors and tradition as
from growth in the
increases, future
on the possibility of raising per
countries where cephalopods are already accepted,
other hand, on developing markets in countries
as yet unfamiliar items of
Table 12
, cuttle-
213"7 279 .. 0 1.,97 2.
42.7 58.2 0 .. 39 0 .. 48
- -
256 .. 4 337.3 2.36 2,,
Institut:ional 1 catering
'"
, cuttle=
42.,4 SQ .. O ) )
5.,0 7.0 ) 0 .. 44 ) 0.,
~
211 .. 9 250 .. 0 2.
5.8 5.0 ) )
Dried, smoked,
salted 47 .. 3 48.0 ) 0 .. 59 ) 0 .. 57
Fermented 12.3 15.0 ) )
581.1 712 .. 3
-5.42 5.90
30.0 30.0
611.l 742 .. 3
a The rate of of personal
consumption expenditures in real terms from
~as assumed to be 6 per cent, the median as
in the report prepared the Government of Japan
on long-term perspectives of demand production of
agricultural prod.uctso It was ass-:.nned relative
of sq~id would rise at a compound rate 6 per cent per
those of octopus 4 per cent, line
A 1.1 per cent increase per ann:um in
<fas assumed, in accordance with estimates prepared
Japanese Ministry of Welfare, implying a
m:U.licoo in 197 3 to a 8 million in
where a.re
consumption
attained levels can be looked fore For
, are not available to make a detailed
the market segments as in the case of ,
empirical evidence in the form of household
the relationship between changes
of cephalopods Never-
,
suggest that consumption is fairly
in income, and ·there some
estimates of future consumption
on this basise These estimates, which
assume ticity of unity~ are given in Table
be
Table 13
.-
Estimated Demand for Cephalopods in 1985
South Europe and Thailand
1972/74 1985
Per Total Per Total
capita tons capita tons
~~~~~~~~~....(k,g~lig,.:.~)~.~~~-l_±_v_e_.~.-~e~i~gb."-t~~-"-(~,~~~~-l_i_v_e~w_e_i~·g~~..,..ht
0,, 0.,32
0,, 53
3,,55 192
L, 54
- 55 -
Table 14
Estimated World Consumption of Oephalopods in 1985
1
000 tons live weight
Approximate Estimated consumption
present: l/ 2 1 in 1985 3/
consumption- Low'""" High-
l.d
WORLD TOTAL- 990
AFRICA 4 6 6
L..A.TTI'ii AMERICA 11 11 15
NOR.TH AMERICA 2 2 2
France 12 13 18
Italy 53 56 81
Spain 124 139 192
Other 18 19 19
U.S.S.R. 23 26 26
l,/ Data for 1972-74 average except for Japan for which 1973 data
were used (see Table 12)
Another s concluded
processed squid products to the UeS. market~ in
form, is economically present. m.omen ·::
However, it seems possible ·that properly dressed fresh O:t'
frozen squid migb.'t be acc.ep of
experts suggested
acc>~pt1ance migh~t rbe f;,,ncrecJ.s,sd the
squid into :st.rips;
r,s.(:;ei"'iled a -:-ver:l
f{Jur=fifths
Global Outlook
are
su~rized in
is likely to be some
a~·t present
~ ~
Economic a Sguid
Brune Go Noetz~ls
= 58 =
f isl'l
are semi-
therefore
are regarded
income groupso
at prices
and upper income
countries$
in
fishery
sections of the population throughout.
APPENDIXES
Appendix
Squids
Other important ornmastrephid squid are those of the genus Illex, namely
Illex illecebrosus, I. coindetii and I. argentinus. The distribution of these
species covers an extensive range in the Atlantic from Greenland to the
Caribbean and off northern Brazil; on the eastern side of the Atlantic their
distribution extends from Iceland along the western coast of the British
Isles and the El).ropean continent and down into the Mediterranean. Dosidicus
gigas and Ommastrephes caroli are also spread throughout the world 1 s oceans,
but are found especially in tropical areas off both coasts of the American
continent, in the Arabian Sea and o~f the northwest coast of Australia.
The species of the family Loliginidae, wh:ich are mostly taken by trawl,
a1so form an important part of the world's commercial squid resources. They
have a worldwide distribution in tropical and temperate areas. Loligo
vulgaris occurs in the Eastern Atlantic down to the Gulf of Guinea and in
the Mediterranean. L. pealei is mainly distributed in the Western Atlantic
from New Zngland to the Caribbean Sea. L. forbesi occurs in the Mediterranean
as well as European waters, and is recorded even in the Red Sea. The distri-
bction of L. opal.escense:x:tends along the Pacific coast of North America and
- 62 - Appendix l
Page 2
Fi,gure l
20"
PACIFIC OCEAN
@
INOIAN
OCEAN
Family Ommaatre&dae
l. Todaropsia 10. N. nipponicus
2o IllEllJC a:rgentinua lle TOO,a:rodee paoif'icus
3. I. illecebrosus 12. T. sagittatus
I. coindetii 13. Symplectoteuthis oualaniensis
5. I. oxygoniua 14. Dosidicms gigas
6. Nototodaru.e sloani 1:11.1.•1Jciolu. 150 bartrami
7. N. s. gouldi 16. o. pteropus
8. N. a. philippinen,sis o. caroli
9. N. e. bawaiieneis
Family Loliginidaa
A. Loligo f orbesi L. opalescerus
B. L. vu.lgaris a. L. edulis
c. L. pealei H. L. ohinenais
D. L. plei I. L. duvaucelii
E. L. brasilienais
Cuttlefish
Octopus
The order Octopoda is divided into some ten families of which only
the Octopodidae are commercially exploited. These animals are found
from the inter-tidal zone to the continental slope and inhabit holes,
crevices, old shells, etc. They are carnivorous, feeding on crustaceans,
other molluscs and fishes. It is estimated that there are perhaps 100
species of Octopodidae occurring in various parts of the world 7 s oceans.
Octopus vulgaris is considered the most valuable from a commercial point
of view; Q_. dofleini, 0. eledone, Q_. maya and Q_. ocellatus are also widely
harvested.
Scientific name Average size Geographic distribution
Nototodarus
s loani gouldi
III
II
1~5
(total
m Around Australia (excluding
wesJc coas-t) and Tasmania
11
)l
length)
Nototodarus I
! 26-30 cm New Zealand- Fiji Island
s loani sloai."1.2
I (leng-th of
trw!k)
I 26 cm Aroun.d Japanese Islands
pacific us ! (leng-th of
trrmk)
(Okhotsk,-Honsb.u-Okinawa-
East: China Sea)
Ill ex I
,, 25-28 cm
( "cotal length
A-tlantic Ocean (Greenland-
illecebrosus '/.
Caribbean Sea, Iceland and
of tru."'1.k) around U.K.)
OCTOPUS
Canned ) D. bleekeri
) T. pacificus
"CJ
Smoked T. pacificus
i::: )
<U ) ) Paste
..:;,:
Fermented ) Various squids, in parti-
i::: ) ) Fermented-salted ) cular T. pacificus
;:.l
) "Shiokara" )
+-''"' )
) Kasuzuke, misozuke )
)
)
Kneaded ) Kamaboko )
) Chikuwa ) T. pacific us
) ) Sausage )
)
) Preparations ) Saki-ika )
) ) Sugata-yaki ) T. pacific us
) ) Nobashi-surume )
)
) Seasoned Kizami-surume Various species
)
11
Tsukudani"
'--
~1 ) ) Vitamin B ) Liver
~ ) ) Squid sauce ) Liver
:S ) Fresh ) Squid oil ) Liver
0 ) ) Sepia pigment ) Ink sac
Imported squid (including cuttlefish) are divided into nine groups according
to the form of the commodities: (1) live~ (2) fresh, (3) frozen 9 (4) chilled 9 , I
(5) salted, (6) brine-cooked, (7) dried$ (8) smoked and (9) prepared or preserven . .:::.
Of these, two items (8 and 9) are liberalized, while the rest (1 to 7) are desig-
nated as non-liberalized items. Non-liberalized items are subject to the impo::."t
quota (IQ) which is determined by the Government each year by taking into accow.'t
the current demand and supply situation for that com.-nodity.
Items 1 to 6 are categorized as raw squid and the others as dried squid.
Raw squid are subdivided into cuttlefish "mongo-ika" and squid. The quota for
"mongo-ika" is determined in quantity terms twice a year and the commodity may be
imported from any country. Each quota is subdivided, with a part going to ex-
clusively domestic trading firIDB and a part to firms participating in the Govern-
ment's import-oriented programme.
The IQ for the other squid (i.e. other than "mongo-ika") is also divided into
two. One category is set aside exclusively for the Republic of Korea and is
determined twice a year in value terms - this is alloted only to trading firms.
The other category is the IQ for General Fishery Products which was applicable
to 62 countries in 1974. In this instance, the quota is determined twice a year
in quantity terms and distributed to trading firms, joint ventures and the pro-
cessing sector.
T!-1e quota for dried squid is determined once a year and is classifed into
two, a quota for Korean Fishery Products and a quota for General Fishery Products;
the former is alloted only to trading firms and the latter to both trading firms
and the processing sector.
2/ There are three aspects of the import-oriented programme: (1) where fishery
agreements are in existence; (2) where joint ventures have been launched with
a share of over 50 percent of the Japanese side; and (3) where squid fishing
projects are included in the business plan of the overseas joint enterprises.
- 68 - Appendix 4
Page 2
The above description of the IQ system for squids can be summarized as follows:
Customs
No. No. I t e m s
Period of Survey
(b) Prices: average price of the quantity purchased by one household per
annum was divided by consumer's price index to obtain relative prices.
Demand Function
log y =a + b log x
1
+ c log x
2
Results of Calculations
(b) Octopus
Tariffs
( 1) wings;
(2) tentacles;
(3) strips cut rrom the body.
- 74 -
Appendix 7
Page 3
Squid:
Large 700 g
Medium 300-700 g
Small 300 g
Cuttlefish:
Large 2 kg
Medium 1-2 kg
Small l kg
Octopus:
Large 3 kg
Medium 1-3 kg
Small 1 kg
(c) Presentation
(d) Quality
(1) The health regulations provide that the mercury content should be
less than 0.5 mg/kg.
(5) During sea transport the maximum temperature in the hold should
be -18°and on land -22°c.
(6) All species of less than 300 g should be marked "P" and those of
mare than 300 g to be marked "M".
WORLD TOTAL 635.0 862.3 835.6 979.1 1 216.2 1 019.3 976.0 1 002.8 1 121.-0 1 071.7 1 070.9
Squid 444.1 608.5 596.4 689.6 920.4 742.6 720.4 718.3 798.7 154.5 743.5
Cuttlefish 85.3 -100.5 9:i. 2 105.5 103·. 7 103.7 92.5 119.0 115.8 139.1 136.8
Octopus 105.6 153.3 148.0 184.o 192.1 173.0 163.1 165.5 206.5 178.1 190.6
AFRICA 3.2 4.2 3.7 3.6 5.3 4.8 4.6 3.7 4.4 4.9 9.1
Squid 0.9 1. 2 1.4 1.2 1. 3 1.1 2.1 1.4 1.5 3.1 6.7
Cuttlefish 0.9 1.1 1.1 1.1 0.9 0.5 1.1 1.0 0,9 0.3 1. 2
Octopus 1.4 1. 9 1.2 1. 3 3.1 3.2 1.4 1. 3 2.0 1.5 1. 2
NORTH AMERICA 19.3 17.4 14.9 17.6 13.1 11.3 12.3 17.1 10.4 6.9 13.1
Squid 19.3 17.4 14.9 17 .6 13.1 11. 3 12.3 17.1 10.4 6.9 13.1
Cuttlefish
Octopus
"'"'
Canada 10.8 7.9 5.1 7.0 0.1 0.1 1.6 0.6 0.1
Squid 8.5 9.5 9.8 10.6 13.1 11. 2 12.3 15.5 10.4 6.3 13.0
Cuttlefish
Octopus
AMERICA
LA'l'lN 4.5 2.5 5.8 7.7 7.5 5.6 5.8 7.9 9.6 10.1 12.1
Squid 4.1 1. 6 3.6 4.6 5.1 3.1 3.5 4.2 4.5 6.8 8.1
Cuttlefish
Octopus 0.4 0.9 2.2 3.1 2.4 2.5 2.3 3.7 5.1 3.3 L)., 0
Argentina 0.7 0.8 2.4 3.9 3.6 1.3 2.0 2.6 2.3 4.7 5.1
Squid 0.6 0.7 1.3 2.5 3.1 1.1 1. 5 1. 8 1.7 4.1 5.1
Cuttlefish
Octopus 0.1 0.1 1.1 1.4 0.5 0.2 0.5 0.8 0.6 0.6
Mexico 0.3 0.9 1.Li· 1. 8 2.0 2. Lf 1. 7 2.6 3.9 2.0 3.5
Squid 0.1 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2
Cuttlefish
Octopus 0.3 0.8 1.1 1.6 1.9 2.2 l. 5 ·~.4 3.7 1. 9 3.3
Table I (c)
-
...
~
Cuttlefish
Octopus
Portugal 4.2 6,3 4.6 5.8
-4.9 -3.6 -4.0 -4.2 -4.5 4.2 5.1
~
Squid 1. 3 2.5 1.2 2.0 0.9 0.7 0.8 0.6 0.8 0.8 1.2
Cuttlefish 2.2 2.6 2.1 2.4 2.2 1.9 1.4 1.3 1.4 1.3 1. L~
Octopus 0.7 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.8 1.0 1.8 2.3 2.3 2.1 2.5
Spain 54.0 90.5 '::Ji. 7 100.0 94.2 111.0 94.0 164.0 160.0 164.0 162.0
Squid
--
16.6
--
18.0
-
15.6
- - -
19.5
--
14.5
--
39.1
--
36.2 89.5
- -
30.8 42.6 45.3
Cutt.Le fish 14.1 17.2 16.0 16.9 15.9 15.6 12.9 23.5 21.0 40.3 39.9
Octopus 23.3 55.3 60.1 63.6 63.8 56.3 44.9 51.0 108.2 81.1 76.8
Table I ( b)
Venezuela 0.5 0.3 0.5 0.7 0.3 0.6 0.5
~Squid~
-~--,,~-
-----r---· ~-~~.
-~=-----
- - ~
---- -1.2 -1.9 2.3
-~
3.6
~~=
- - - - - - - -
Squid 393. 6 514.0. 7 542.8 625.3 869.2 651. 8 643.3 559.9 705.9 632.2 615.0
Cuttlefish 51. 5 61. 0 56.7 65.8 65.7 67.0 57.2 70.7 70.5 73.2 7ll-. 3
Octopus 68 .Li 80.2 68.9 102.1 108.3 96.1 100.2 94.9 74.7 77.6 92.6
Hong Kong 1. 5 1.4 2, lt 1. 7 3.5 1+ .4 4.3 3.7 4.7 4.1 4.4
Squid 0.7 1.0 1. 9 1.1 2.3 3.3 3.2 2.4 3.7 3.0 3.3
Cuttlefish 0.8 0.4 0.5 0.6 1. 2 1.1 1.1 1. 3 1. 0 1.1 1.1
Octopus
Japan 396.8 578.6 551.1 695.3 877.1 682.8 615.6 568.5 668.4 550.1 556.9
-sqliid 289.4 %0.3 4lf2. 9 545.9 728.6 544.1 487.6 446.6 561. 3 Lf50 ,Lf 41+6 .1
Cuttlefish 40.3 lf9. 4 42.5 51. 2 45.6 45.9 31.lf 35,9 40.0 35.8 3 1! '1
Octopus 67.1 78.9 65.7 98.2 102.9 92.8 96.6 86.0 67.1 63.9 7h.7
Korea, ReJ2. of 87.8 71.6 78.2 45.0 92.7 67.6 78.1 52.5 66.3 73.9 72.6
Squid 86.6 70.6 75. 5- lfi. 7 84·. 7 59.9 . 4o.4 57.2 56.6 5178'
Cuttlefish . .. . .. ... . .. 3.9 5.0 3.1 5.4 LJ,. 0 5.2 6.5
Octopus 1. 2 1.0 2.7 3.3 L[ .1 2.7 2.9 6.7 5.1 12 .1. 14.3
Malaysia 1. 7 1. 2 1. 3 2.1 2.6 2.7 3.5 3.6 3.1 4.3 6.7
Squid
Cuttlefish 1. 7 1. 2 1. 3 2.1 2.6 2.7 3.5 3.6 3.1 4.3 6.7
Octopus
Phili12pines 7.6 10.0 11.4 9.9 17.9 13.1 12.5 12.7 7.5 15.5 21.lJ·
Squid 1/ 7:6 10.0 11.4 9.9 17.9 13.1 12.5 12.7 7.5 15:5 21. L[
Cuttlefish
Octopus
S. Vietnam, Re12. of l[. 5 4.5 4.7 4.5 3.3 3.8 9, Lf 15.3 10.7 12.9 12.9
Squid
Cuttlefish 1+, 5 4.5 4.7 4.. 5 3.3 3.8 9.4 15.3 10.7 12.9 12.9
Octopus
Thailand ... . .. ... 19.6 29.7 24.5 59.9 50.6 65.2 81.4 _§]_~
Squid !/ ... . .. . .. 19.6 29.7 24-. 5 59.9 50.6 65.2 81.4 69.4
Cuttlefish
Octopus
Squid 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3
Cuttlefish
Octopus - - - - - - - 0.1 0.1
- nil
0.0 or O negligible quantity (less than one half of the unit indicated)
data not available
Statistical Annex II
Table II
1964 1965 1966 1967 1968 1969 1970 1971 1972 1973 1974
Mediterranean flying squid - 0.2 0.1 0.4 0.3 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 f-1
(Illex coindetii)
Japanese flying squid. 324.6 467.5 458.4 518.7 753.1 538.1 484.3 401.9 517.9 378.3 359.1
Todarodes 2acificus)
Tasmanian flying squid ... . .. . .. ... ... .. ' . '. '.' . .. 13o4 18.6
Nototodarus sloani
Squids n.e.i. 63.2 84.0 86.3 121.4 119.8 157.8 190.7 256.9 222.1 297.8 288.6
( Loliginidae)
(Ornmastrephidae)
Table II (b)
CUTTLEFISH 85.3 100.5 91. 2 105.5 103.7 103.7 92.5 119. 115.8 139.1 136.8
---- - - -- -- - - - - - -
Japanese cuttlefish 23.2 20.4 15 .LJ. 15.7 15.3 16.5 1L~, 7 15.4 15.2 12.2 17.0
(Sepia esculenta
Common cuttlefish 28.9 33,3 30.6 33.9 32.7 32.1 25,6 35.8 35.6 52.8 54 ,Lf
(Sepia officinalis
Cuttlefishes n.e.i. 33.2 l~6. 8 Lf5, 2 55.9 55.7 55.1 52.2 67.8 65.0 74.1 65.4
(Sepia spp-)
( Sepi<?l_a spp. )
a
00
OCTOPUS 105.6 153.3 148.0 184.0 192.1 173.0 163.1 1.65. 5 206.5 178.1 190.6 N
~~- -~~ ~~~
~-~~ ~~ ~~~-~
~-- ====
Common octopus 6lJ·. 9 44.0 34.8 66.2 78.5 65.5 61.6 49.1 40.2 31.8 l~1. 5
(Octopus vulga1..,is)
Curled and musl<y octopus 1. 8 1.9 2.3 2.2 2. 3. 2.0 2.9 2.5 3.3 2.7 2.7
(Eledone cirrosa)
(Eledone ~ta
Octopus n.e.i. 38.9 107.4 110.9 115.6 111. 3 105.5 98.6 113.9 163.0 143.6 146.4
( Poly12us ~· )
(Octopus spp.)
Source: FAO Yearbooks of Fishery Statistics, Catches and Landings Series, Vols. 30-38
Statistical Annex II
Table III
-r---.-~~~~-~.-
Korea Rep. 2.2 1. 2 1. 3 0.8 0.3 3 058 1 910 2 438 1 656 583
Singapore 0.2 480
Thailand 0.1 617
Others n.e.s. 0.0 172
OCTOPUS
fE.El_ sb_-2-~:2'." en 36.2 35.6 6Lf. Lf 63.9 54.1 67.7 7 39lt 10 56Li 32 777 32 372 4-2 179 70 934
Spain 34.5 30.5 59.9 59.3 L\-0. 8 Lf6. 2 6 894 8 313 30 097 30 063 31 280 Lf9 9l!-1
Korea Rep. 0.2 1. 0 1. 8 1. 6 Lf,5 8.8 83 389 855 878 1+ 158 9 090
Italy 0.1 0.2 0. :l 1. 0 1. 8 3.6 83 29 553 1 656 3 636
Mauritania 2.Li 0.6 0.1 0.1 2.7 973 2!5'7 65 589 1 887
Thailand 0.1 0.9 L2 0.3 390 522 172
Others :l, 4 L5 l. 9 LO 5. '/ 6. 1 lf 1'7 806 1 539 423 3 g7q. 6 208
- 84 -
Statistical Annex IV
Table IV
Quantity Value
('OOO tons product weight) ('OOO U.S. dollars)
1970 1971 1972 1973 1974 1970 1971 1972 1973 1974
Fresh, frozen 6.7 10.7 19.8 28.2 33.5 3,887 5,452 13,329 14,260 26~404
Japan 6.6 5.3 9.1 6.4 7.1 3 862 2 055 4 666 4 165 6 435
Uruguay 0.1 6
U.S.A. 0.0 12
Greece 0.0 25
Table v
Italy - Imports of Cephalopods by Country of Origin~ 197J..- 74
Quantity Value
('OOO tons product weight) :
1
OOO U.S. dollars)
1971 1972 1973 1974 1971 1972 1973 1974
SQUID
Fresh, frozen 8.5 10.2 13.1 7.1 4 562 5 806 10 202 '7
I 159
Japan 7.3 7.1 8.4 3.0 3 842 3 706 6 526 3 655
Thailand 0.3 1.6 2.0 0.8 204 1 190 1 599 591
Spain 0.3 0.2 0.5 152 135 394
U.K. 0.1 0.2 56 135
Korea 5 Rep. 0.1 0.3 48 304
Angola 0.3 181
South Africa 0.8 820
Other Asian 0.2 0.8 116 618
Others n.e.s. 0.2 0.8 2.2 1.4 144 459 l 683 1 171
CUTTLEFISH
Fresh, frozen 3.7 3.0 5.3 4.1 1 709 l 161 2 875 2 802
Japan 1.6 1. 9 1.4 1.1 655 662 560 587
France 0.6 1.4 0.6 279 987 409
Spain 0.5 157
Thailand 0 .J.,l 0.6 0.9 1.2 263 320 725 1 120
Korea, Rep. 0.2 0.1 0.9 0.6 91 33 l.J,27 350
Malaysia 0.1 105
Otner Asian 0.1 78
Mauritania 0.2 83
Others n.e.s. 0.2 0.4 0.5 0.6 81 146 93 326
OCTOPUS
771.J,
, 047
Fresh, frozen 2.9 1.4 1.8 1.6 972 634 ..L
Table VI
France - Im;eorts of Ce:ehalopods bl'.'. Countrz of Ori~in 11 1911-74
Quantity Value
(000 tons ;eroduct wei~ht)
1
(
1
000 U.S. dollars)
1971 1972 1973 1974 1971 19'72 1973 1974
SQUID
Fresh, frozen
salted 1.8 1.5 3.1 3.4 1 332 l 301 3 076 3 944
Thailand 0.1 0.0 0.5 0.7 36 12 582 854
Morocco 1.0 0.3 0.5 0.7 909 250 760 1 091
U.K. 0.1 0.1 0.1 o.o 29 56 53 4
U.S.A. 0.2 J.3 0.4 0.4 106 128 283 292
Italy 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.3 38 305 325 341
China 0.1 0.1 0.1 44 29 38
Japan 0.2 0.6 0.5 122 603 597
Indonesia. 0.2 o.o o.o 153 36 30
Others n.e.s. 0.0 0.2 0.6 0.8 17 363 402 765
CUTTLEFISH
Fresh, frozen,
salted 1.1 1.4 2.5 2.1 837 1 021 2 224 2 585
Thailand 0.8 1.0 1.8 1.3 568 675 1 519 1 498
Morocco 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 93 116 242 319
Malaysia 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 48 121 186 137
Italy 0.0 o.o 0.1 0.2 46 44 118 174
Senegal o.o 0.0 o.o 0.1 27 29 31 144
Japan 0.0 o.o o.o 9
Table VII
--~~--
--- --~-~ -- Quantity ('OOO tons product ~Jeight r ----Va-lue ( I ooo1L s:<lollar_s_)_ _ _ _ _
1969
~~~-~-=--=-~-=~~~===-~--""""==---==~~-.o=~~=--~~-~
1970 1971 1972 1973 1974 1969 1970 1971--~1972- 1973 1974
SQUID, CUTTLEFISH,
OCTOPUS
470 326
In airtight containers 2.2
-
2.5
-- 0.3
- - 0.2
- -
0.5
-- 0.2
- -
1 023
--
l
--
394 191
-- -237 -- -
Philippines 1.4 0.6 0.1 o.o 0.3 0.2 612 355 87 28 266 26lf
U.S.A. o.o O.l 0.0 0.1 o.o 0.0 34 38 36 94 64 57
Others n.e.s. 0.3 0.7 0.2 o.o 0.1 o.o 117 379 q5 32 24 4
Statistical Annex VIII
Table VIII
Spain - Exports of Cephalopods by Country of Destination! 1969=74
Japan ... 36.5 34.2 65.4 43.3 55.0 . .. 11 705 17 506 32 386 32 531 52 995
Argentina . .. ... ... 1.3 0.8 1.1 ... . .. ... 403 188 815
Italy ... ... 1.5 1.3 1.0 0.5 . .. . .. 513 434 631 381
Others n.e.s. ... 0.4 2.8 3.8 2.7 4.6 . .. 148 1 949 2 076 2 441 4 461
Table IX
Thailand - Exporti3___<?_.f_ _fephalopods_by Co~ntry of Destination a 1969-7lt
Fresh, frozen
salted
~~~-
0.4
- - 2.9
- - 6.0
-~
15.4 14.3 ... 315 -~
l 816 4 816
~-~
10 062 13 782
-~-
Hong Kong 0.3 0.9 1.4 1. 7 0.. 7 ... 237 621.f l 2L}3 1 961 309
...
\0
Japan - 0.5 1. 3 5.1 5.2 - 377 l 119 l,l 509 7 369 ...
France - 0. lj 0.6 Lf. 0 l. 9 ... - 211 334 548 1 445
Spain - 0.2 0.3 0,2 0.7 ... - 109 206 143 730
Others n.e.s. - 0.3 0.8 0.3 2.3 .. ' - 178 592 384 1 797
~~----~~---
Table X
Republic of Korea - Exports of Cephalopods by Country of Destination, 1970m74
Fresh, frozen
8 802 12 OOO
cured
-- 5.1
-2.3 4.6 7.3
-9.3 7 199 3 598
- - -5 578
- - -
Japan 4.2 0.3 3.9 5.5 8.1 6 290 740 4 302 4 776 9 148
Hong Kong 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.4 O.l 385 254 413 l 179 351
China o.o 1.5 0.3 a.9 a.7 0 2 153 628 1 944 2 027 \0
0
Singapore a.3 D.l o.o O.l o.o 282 174 91 279 56
Others n.e,s. 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.4 108 185 77 471 418
PreEared or
Ere served ... .. . ... 4.8
-- -3.9 ... ... ... 17 720 17 979
Others n.e.s. ... ... . .. 0.1 a.a ... . .. ... 2'.Z5 213
Table XI
Expenditure: Yen
Quantity: 100 g
Average price: Yen/100 g
1964 1 160 74.040 15.66 165 Lf, OOO 41.22 .. . ... ... 157 3.330 46.83
1965 1 410 75.780 18.61 162 3.130 52.16 ... ... . .. 184 3.410 53.94
1966 1 617 85.030 19.01 173 2.960 57 .96 .. . ... . .. 201 3.430 58.71
1967 1 818 87.460 20.79 189 2.870 65.87 .. . ... . .. 214 3.470 61.76
1968 1 939 86.260 22 .'--l·S 200 3.070 65.21 '.. . .. . .. 233 3.640 6Lf. 09 D
1969 2 010 78.003 25.77 228 3.211 70.91 440 5.235 84.14 243 3.635 66.97 ~
1970 2 526 79.218 31.89 276 2.964 93.15 408 4.075 100.17 295 3.673 B0.24 ft
1971 2 971 69.955 lf5. 73 275 2.370 116.12 395 3.227 122.31 353 3.755 <Jll. 00
1972 3 472 78.532 44.21 375 3.044 123.34 438 3.259 134.40 425 4.106 103.48
1973 3 827 76.890 49.79 l~88 3.559 137.04 605 4.192 1Lf4, 42 467 lf. 637 115.76
1f Includebl cuttlefish
Source: Annual Repor•t on Family Income and Expenditure Surveys~ Office of Prime Minister 9 Ju.pan 9 197 3
- 92 -
Engel, H.H., Review about commercial trawling gear used for squid
1975 fishing in the North Atlantic. Paper presented at
FAI:J Expert C-0n~ultation on Squid and other Cephalopoda,
Tokyo, September 1975, 4 p.
Gulland, J .A. (Ed.) The fish resources of the ocean. London, Fishing
1972 News (~ooks) Ltd., 255 p. Rev.Ed. of FAO Fish.Tech.Pap .•
(97):425 p.
Hamlisch, R. and 'the dem,~nd f~r fish as h~n food. 1!! Fish in nutrition,
R..A. Taylor, edited E. Reen a.::id R. K.reuzers London, Fishing News
1962 (Rooks) Ltd., pp. 385-l~07
Lee, C.M., T.C. The potential us•2 (;f squid as a protein resource.
Lee and c.o. In Fishery products,, edited by R. Kreuzer. West
Chichester, Byfleet, Surrey~ Fishing News (Books) Ltd., pp. 243-4
1974
= 94 =
Robinson, M.A. Determinants of demand for fish and their effects upon
1973 resources. Paper presented at FAO Technical Conference
on Fishery and Development, Vancouver,
February 1973. J.Fish.Res.Board Can., 30(12)Pt.2:2051-8
Voss, G.L. and The cephalopods cf Hong Kong. Hong Kong, Governm.ent
G.R. Williamson Press, 138 p.
1972
Working Papers
SCS/76/TtlP /L~2 Baum, G.A, and J.A. Maynard, Bayawan Municipality, Negros
Oriental Province/Negros. A socio-economic study on the
rural fishing population of Bayawan Mu..TJ.icipality in
connect: ion with the Mu.."licipal Fisheries Pilot Programme.
Manila, 1976. 33p. \cou.-itry - Philippines)
WORKSHOP REPORTS
SCS/DEV /73/l Woodland, A.G. et al. The South China Sea Fisheries:
A proposal for accelerated development. Rome, FAO,
1974. 162p.