Total Productive Maintenance
Total Productive Maintenance
12.1 Introduction
Nakajima, who is considered by many in the literature as the father of total pro-
ductive maintenance (TPM), defines it [5] as “productive maintenance carried out
by all employees through small group activities.” He also adds “TPM is equipment
maintenance performed on a company wide basis.” The authors define TPM as a
management approach to maintenance that imports total quality management
(TQM) philosophy and techniques to maintenance. TPM focuses on involving all
employees in the organization in equipment improvement. This approach has its
origins at Nippondenso, a subsidiary of the Toyota Motor Company in the 1960s
and evolved in the Japanese manufacturing sector beginning with the application of
American- and European-style preventive maintenance, and progressing to the
application of TQM and just-in-time manufacturing concepts to the equipment
maintenance arena. In 1971, the first prize is awarded by Japan Institute of Plant
Engineers (JIPE) for successful implementation of TPM and still going on.
TPM started in Japan and has spread to the Far East, Europe, South America,
and the USA. It became a recognized methodology for improving equipment
reliability and plant productivity. TPM eliminates losses resulting from unplanned
downtime, reduced speed, and quality. TPM brought to industry overall equipment
effectiveness (OEE) as a measure that combines losses from unplanned downtime,
reduced speed, and quality. The purpose of this chapter is to present the concepts
and implementation of TPM. Section 12.2 outlines the goals and the key elements
of TPM followed by autonomous maintenance in Sect. 12.3. Section 12.4 presents
equipment management, and Sect. 12.5 describes TPM implementation.
Section 12.6 provides a brief summary of this chapter.
The JIPE in its definition of TPM in 1971 stated that TPM seeks the following five
key goals:
• maximize OEE, which includes availability, process efficiency, and product
quality;
• take a systematic approach to reliability, maintainability, and life cycle costs
(LCC);
• involve operations, materials management, maintenance, engineering, and
administration in equipment management;
• involve all levels of management and workers; and
• improve equipment performance through small group activities and team
performance.
The key elements of TPM include the following:
• Autonomous maintenance: Equipment operators are the focal point of TPM
activities. Although most operators understand what their equipment does, few
understand the underlying mechanisms of how it does it. The term “autonomous
maintenance” is used to describe the activities of the operators, which relate to
equipment maintenance, and to the independent study nature of the other
equipment improvement activities. Operators would perform cleaning, inspec-
tion, lubrication, adjustments, and minor component change outs and other light
maintenance tasks requiring some training and instruction, but not compre-
hensive craftsman skills. The operator gradually learns how to diagnose
equipment problems before they become serious.
• Equipment Management: In TPM, whenever equipment performs at a level
less than is required, the performance loss is recorded and monitored. These
losses can be grouped into six categories: breakdowns, setup and adjustments,
idling and minor stoppages, reduced speed, defects, and yield losses.
Breakdowns and setups cause downtime and impact availability, reduced speed
impacts the cycle time and defects, and yield losses impact quality. OEE is the
key TPM performance measure and is the product of availability, cycle time,
and quality rate. The operator and maintainer are trained to identify problems
related to OEE and perform root cause analyses in teams to investigate the
losses.
• Systematic Planning and Continuous Improvement: Within the maintenance
department, the TPM methodology encourages the development of systematic
planning and control of preventive and corrective maintenance, and fully sup-
ports the autonomous activities performed by the operator. In plants where the
basic operating and maintaining environment has been improved to the point of
diminishing returns, active maintenance prevention activities are undertaken, as
described earlier in the sections on designing for maintainability. Throughout,
there should be a strong emphasis on improving operator and maintainer skills.
Spending on training is customarily on the order of 5–8 % of the labor budget.
12.3 Autonomous Maintenance 263
The benefits of involving the operators in the success of TPM cannot be overem-
phasized. A pragmatic way of achieving this is by using a systematic, data-based
approach to skill transfer. Skill transfer is the process of moving tasks requiring
lower skills from the exclusive domain of one work group to a shared task zone.
Under this policy, an operator who has been properly trained and certified can
perform a mechanic’s task and vice versa. This partnership between operations and
maintenance integrates maintenance and operation/manufacturing and has many
benefits that include the following:
• Operators and mechanics become multi-skilled, which leads to job enrichment
and improved flexibility of workers.
• The involvement of operators in routine maintenance builds a sense of
responsibility, pride, and ownership.
• Delay times are reduced and productivity is increased.
• Teamwork between operations and maintenance is promoted.
where
loading time is defined as the available time minus planned downtime. Planned
downtime refers to the downtime officially scheduled in the production plan, such
as scheduled maintenance and management activities.
Theoretical cycle time and loading time are constant per day. Therefore, OEE is
directly related to the number of items of good quality. OEE can be improved by
enhancing the availability, performance efficiency and, most importantly, the
quality rate. It can be seen that availability can be improved by reducing downtime
and that performance efficiency can be improved by reducing the cycle time.
In order to improve the quality rate, the state at which the equipment produces a
high-quality product must be identified. Then, a maintenance policy should be
established to keep the equipment in this state. Therefore, the goal of maintenance
should be to keep the equipment in the state where zero defects are produced.
The practice indicates that TPM is usually implemented over a horizon of 3 years.
Nakajima suggests four stages for implementing TPM. The stages are preparation,
preliminary implementation, TPM implementation, and stabilization. Each stage
consists of a number of steps. The total number of steps needed to implement TPM
is 12. An excellent treatment of TPM implementation is provided by Nakajima [5].
• Hold TPM kickoff: This is the first step in TPM implementation and is the start
of the activities against the six big equipment losses. During the preparation
stage, management and professional staff play the major role. At this step,
everyone must participate and work to eliminate the big losses. In the meeting,
management reports on accomplishment in the preparation stage including TPM
promotion structure, basic TPM goals and policies and master plan for TPM
development. Management affirms management commitment.
12.5 TPM Implementation 267
12.5.4 Stabilization
• Perfect TPM implementation and raise TPM levels. This is the final step and
at this stage, the organization perfects TPM implementation using continuous
improvement tools such as Six Sigma and the Deming cycle.
12.6 Summary
This chapter presented TPM. It provided a brief history of TPM followed by the
goals and features of TPM. TPM has brought TQM techniques and tools to
maintenance. Autonomous maintenance and equipment management are two
unique features of TPM that are presented in detail in this chapter. An example how
to compute OEE is provided in this chapter. A detailed account for TPM imple-
mentation following Nakajima approach in [5] is provided including challenges and
success factors.
Exercises
1. Define TPM.
2. State the six big losses TPM strives to reduce and how would you measure each
loss?
3. How would you develop an autonomous maintenance program?
4. Visit a plant near your area and select one of their critical equipment. Compute
the overall effectiveness for this equipment.
5. State the steps of the PM methodology developed by JIPE.
6. What are the prerequisites for TPM implementation?
7. State the steps for TPM implementation.
270 12 Total Productive Maintenance
8. Explain how the story of John Auskamp “How to Make TPM Everyone’s
Priority” helps in TPM implementation. Obtain the story and read it then
answer.
9. Compare and contrast the steps for implementing TPM and TQM.
10. Suggest an effective organization for TPM implementation.
11. Design an education and training program for TPM implementation.
12. What is the major challenge in TPM implementation and suggest how to
overcome it.
13. Select three companies that have won a TPM implementation prize and identify
what are the common features among their maintenance systems.
14. How can RCM help in TPM implementation?
References
1. Ahuja PS (2009) Total productive maintenance. In: Ben Daya M, Duffuaa S, Raouf A,
Knezevic J, Ait-Kadi D (eds) Handbook of maintenance management and engineering.
Springer, London
2. Ben Daya M (2000) You may need RCM to enhance TPM implementation. J Qual Maintenance
Eng 6(2):82–85
3. Hartman PE (1992) Successfully installing TPM in a non-Japanese plant. TPM Press Inc.,
Pittsburgh
4. John Auskamp in his story “How to make TPM everyone’s priority”. www.tpmconsulting.org/
dwnld/article/tpmww/TPM%20article6.pdf
5. Nakajima S (1988) Introduction to TPM. Productivity Press, Cambridge