Department of Education: Litapan Elementary School
Department of Education: Litapan Elementary School
Department of Education
REGIONAL OFFICE IX, ZAMBOANGA PENINSULA
SCHOOLS DIVISION OF ZAMBOANGA DEL SUR
JOSEFINA DISTRICT
LITAPAN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Decentralizing the governance of Basic Education at the grassroots level is a priority for the
Department of Education. The government emphasized this goal by passing Republic Act 9155 in
2001. School-Based Management (SBM) is defined as the "decentralization" of decision-making
authority from the national, regional, and division levels to the school level that brings together
principals, teachers, students, parents, and local community members to foster productive educational
institutions. Each school is required by the Governance of Basic Education Act of 2001 to establish its
vision, mission, goals, and objectives. Consequently, each school must also create its own School
Improvement Plan (SIP) and Annual Implementation Plan (AIP), which should consider the priorities
and hopes of the school's internal and external constituents.
School Improvement Plan (SIP) is a road map that lays down specific interventions that a
school, with the help of the community and other stakeholders, will undertake within three consecutive
school years. It is carefully structured to focus on key goals and strategies, leading to excellent student
learning and a more effective school organization. It seeks to provide those involved in school planning
with an evidenced-based, systematic approach with the learner's point of view as the starting point.
Ultimately, it envisioned helping schools reach the goal of providing to quality education.
Through a series of consultations from the stakeholders, the formulation of this plan went
through the following processes:
a) situational analysis,
b) revisiting of the DepEd Vision, Mission and Core Values,
c) Formulation of immediate (1 year) and medium-term (3 years) strategies and
interventions/activities,
d) formulation of school goals and improvement priorities,
1 |P a g e
This plan is also aligned to the four priority development areas of the BEDP:
1. Pivoting to quality, ensuring that all learners attain learning standards in every key
stage in the K to 12 program;
2. Expanding access to education for groups in situations of disadvantage to ensure
inclusive and equitable quality service delivery;
3. Empowering learners to be resilient and to acquire life skills; and
4. Strengthening the promotion of the overall well-being of learners in a positive
learning environment where learners exercise their rights and experience joy, while
being aware of their responsibilities as individuals and as members of society.
The programs, projects and activities of this plan is to address the gaps identified which are
beneficial to the school community especially to our main clientele, our learners. The course of this plan
is to provide accessible and quality education towards the holistic development of every learner in
school.
Litapan Elementary School continues to perform its duties and function guided by the following
strategic objectives which are anchored to the Basic Education Development Plan 2030, to wit:
Ensure that all girls and boys complete free, equitable and quality education leading to
relevant and effective learning outcomes;
Ensure that every child attains a minimum reading proficiency appropriate for their level;
Transform the learning environment to be child-friendly, gender-sensitive, motivating, safe
and inclusive;
Provide appropriate materials and technology for learning and administrative use;
Support the physical, mental and overall well-being of learners;
Deliver an integrated, and aligned capacity development interventions; and
Support the welfare and well being of teaching and non-teaching personnel.
The Monitoring and Evaluation Plan is developed so that the school may track the SIP's
progress and evaluate its efficacy in attaining its stated goals in every quarter. This step entails a
continuous process of tracking the plan, updating to-do activities with regular targets, and evaluating
results to chronicle the impact of implementation through the conduct of the quarterly School Monitoring
and Evaluation Adjustment. (SMEA) or Program implementation review (PIR). Respective
program/project owners and/or Responsible persons in the implementation of every activity will present
the progress of its implementation and propose adjustments as necessary.
The School Planning Team (SPT) believes that this is the primary vehicle through which our
school will proceed to improve. Its implementation will address the need of all types of learners in the
community, for they are provided access to quality basic education and given premium consideration in
all mandated and school -initiated programs and activities to be implemented in school. The team
ensures the alignment of the school’s Programs, Projects and Activities to the Pilars of the Basic
Education Plan 2030, where intermediate Outcomes and strategies are determined for a cohesive
output and impact to the learners in acquiring life-long skills.
A. Vision
We dream of Filipinos who passionately love their country and whose values and competencies
enable them to realize their full potential and contribute meaningfully to building the nation.
Our vision is more than a plan's end goal. It is something we want, wish for, and pray for. It is
something we work hard for. The DepEd Vision says that the school wants every learner to grow up to
be real citizens who love their country, have the skills to help it improve, and have a strong desire to do
so. We hope that learners will be wise enough and ready enough for real life. We hope that our learners
will grow in all ways and be ready for life. Our goal or vision is to help learners learn the right values
and skills that they can use in their everyday lives.
In the second part of the DepEd vision, the ideas of "learner-centered" and "continually
improving" are stressed. The focus of teaching must be on the learner. That is, learners must learn on
their own, and teachers should only help them along the way. As a learner-centered institution, we want
them to know how to get better and follow their dreams while keeping their country and its people in
mind. In a learner-centered school, our decisions and actions are based on what is best for our young
learners. When we say, "continuously improving," we mean that we never stop learning, because that's
how it works. We always try to get better for the sake of our students and other important people. Our
students' needs change over time, so the Department has to change and get better to serve them
better.
B. Mission
To protect and promote the right of every Filipino to quality, equitable, culture-based, and
complete basic education where:
Students learn in a child-friendly, gender-sensitive, safe, and motivating environment.
Teachers facilitate learning and constantly nurture every learner.
Administrators and staff, as stewards of the institution, ensure an enabling and supportive
environment for effective learning to happen.
Family, community, and other stakeholders are actively engaged and share responsibility for
developing life-long learners.
The mission outlines what we ought to do and how the different actors should behave to bring
us closer to the vision. In achieving the mission, each member of the school community has a role to
play.
It is important for every organization, especially schools, to have a mission that guides them.
The DepEd Mission is to make sure that every learner has access to a basic education that is
3 |P a g e
C. Core Values
MAKA-DIYOS
MAKA-TAO
MAKABANSA
MAKAKALIKASAN
C.1 MAKA-DIYOS
It is an expression of one’s spiritual beliefs while respecting the spiritual beliefs of others.
Learners and teachers are expected to engage oneself in worthwhile spiritual activities, respect sacred
places, respect religious beliefs of others and demonstrate curiosity and willingness to learn about other
ways to express spiritual life.
C.2 MAKA-TAO
C.3 MAKA-BANSA
Demonstrates pride in being a Filipino, exercises the rights and responsibilities of a Filipino
Citizen. Learners and teachers are expected to identify oneself as a Filipino, respect the flag and
national anthem, promote the appreciation and enhancement of Filipino languages, abide by the rules
of the school, community, and country and enable others to develop interest and pride in being a
Filipino.
C.4 MAKAKALIKASAN
Cares for the environment and utilizes resources wisely, judiciously and economically. Learners
and teachers are expected to show a caring attitude toward the environment, practices waste
management, conserves energy and resources, takes care of school materials, facilities, and
equipment, keeps work areas in order during and after work, keeps one’s work neat and orderly.
The DepEd Vision and Mission are important, but the Core Values are just as important. They
help teachers and students do what they need to do to teach and learn. We should show or live out the
four core values in any easy way we can. The Core Values tell us to love God (Maka-Diyos), love for
fellow men or others (Makatao), love for nature (Makakalikasan), and love for the country (Makabansa).
All school programs and extracurricular and co-curricular activities must be based on these values.
With these values, we can make our goals and visions come true.
Litapan Elementary School is a small school comprising of 9 teachers and 122 learners. It is
an institutions where skills in Literary Arts specifically jazz Chant, Speech Choir are honed and perform
as output in English and Filipino. Every week, a class is assigned to showcase two or three of those
literary skills during flag raising Ceremony, Aside from this, the school also implements Permaculture
Hugelbed Garden- a technology from Australia, Europe and Germany which the school implemented as
an innovation in order to achieve Zero waste and produce organically grown vegetables that eventually
is utilized for the school feeding program and supplied agricultural products to local merchants every
week.
The school is now advocating Zero Non-Biodegradable wastes among learners. This entails
reusing non biodegradable in efficient ways in order to lessen the burden of disposing wastes. The
school’s faculty strongly enforces proper waste management by ensuring that all learners learn how to
convert waste into usable and functional materials.
The stakeholders of the school, parents, barangay officials and non-LGU organizations
(AKHRO Fraternity), OFW benefactors, are all actively involved in school’s initiative to further develop
and support the school’s program. Over the past years, these school partners have greatly advanced
the school’s and learners’ welfare by extending community service, sponsoring feeding and donating
supplementary materials.
With these practices, the School learners acquire life-long skills which they can apply in their
respective family and their community.
6 |P a g e
Litapan Elementary School caters for learners from its own barangay where the school is
situated and a few from the adjacent barangay of Ebarle and Nemeno, Josefina ,Zamboanga del Sur.
The School is mounted on plateau. The ground is clay loam and plain with a cool atmosphere
as the place is located at the foot of Malindang ranges. The school is situated along the National Hi way
with some nearby residential houses. It has an area of 9710 sq.
The learners and the community speak "Cebuano" as their first language. About 17 out of 122
of the learners belong to the Subanen tribe, who are also actively participating in various activities in
the school and the barangay. The learners are members of different religious affiliations like, Roman
Catholic, Alliance Church, Seventh Day Adventist, etc.
The school has only 7 instructional classrooms, designed and developed by the teachers to
make a conducive learning environment for kindergarten to grade-6 learners. Each classroom needs
minor repair, considering that the buildings were constructed at early 20’s and each classroom is in the
standard size of 7 meters by 9 meters.
Along with implementing the different programs and projects, the school also focuses on
improving the facilities and supplies for WinS programs, which provide learners and teachers access to
proper hygiene. With the school’s commitment to delivering what is best for learners, the school
reached two (2) stars in the WinS Program. With its desire to reach three (3) stars in the next cycle of
assessment of the program. Also, other activities like LAC sessions about WinS, preparation of IEC
materials and others, as indicated in the monitoring tool, were considered to achieve three (3) stars in
the WinS program.
Litapan Elementary School is composed of nine (9) personnel, including seven (7) teacher
advisers,one (1) school head and (1) subject teacher at the same time the ICT coor. The teachers of
the school are committed and dedicated to their respective responsibilities. They showed ideal
classroom management practices by establishing classroom rules, having prepared plans for the
learners, involving learners in the activities, respecting every learner's differences and being fair to all
learners. They set goals that challenge and stretch learners to perform their best. They share
remarkable and filled life lesson experiences and provide rewards and recognition to motivate learners
to perform better and become successful.
As learning is a continuous process, teachers keep attending various training that equip them
to become better professionally and help them become more effective and efficient in delivering and
communicating the lessons to the learners.
7 |P a g e
Litapan Elementary School intends to build strong ties with our stakeholders by allowing them
to be part of the programs and projects implemented in the school. The school highly considers that
stakeholders play an essential role in achieving the goals we aimed for and the Department. The school
also conducts regular meetings with teachers and stakeholders to remind them of the goals and their
roles in delivering quality and equitable education to learners. It also gives them directions on carrying
out their roles and responsibilities as partners in the educational process. The school identifies
barangay Local Government Unit, Non-Government Organizations in the community, alumni and other
private individuals as potential partners who in one way will help the school in realizing its goals
B. Access
B.1 Enrollment by Gender by Grade Level, SY: 2018-2019, SY: 2019-2020, SY: 2020-2021,
SY: 2021-2022, SY: 2022-2023
B.1.1 Elementary
SY: 2018-2019 SY: 2019-2020 SY: 2020-2021 SY: 2021-2022 SY: 2022-2023
Grade Level
M F T M F T M F T M F T M F T
Kinder 3 13 16 13 5 18 8 9 17 11 8 19 11 13 24
Grade I 3 9 12 5 13 18 13 6 19 7 7 14 10 9 19
Grade II 9 9 18 3 9 12 5 15 20 14 5 19 7 7 14
Grade III 10 10 20 8 7 15 4 8 12 5 16 21 13 5 18
Grade IV 10 6 16 10 9 19 8 7 15 4 9 13 6 15 21
Grade V 8 13 21 9 4 13 10 9 19 8 6 14 5 10 15
Grade VI 6 5 11 6 11 17 10 4 14 9 8 17 6 6 12
Grand Total 49 65 114 54 58 112 58 58 116 58 59 117 58 64 122
Table B.1.1 Shows the enrolment of the kindergarten to grade 6 for five consecutive school
years. Data shows that the overall enrollment is increasing where remarkable increase happened for
SY 2022-2023. Specifically in kindergarten and Grade 4. Massive campaign for more enrolment
through BLGU and other stakeholders resulted to increase of enrolment.
B.2 Enrollment by Age: School Age Children in the Community vs Enrolled in School (SY 2022-
2023)
Table B.2.2 compares the number of school age children in the community against those
enrolled in school as Kindergarten. The data shows that the school has one (1) girl learner enrolled to
8 |P a g e
Table B.2.2 shows that only 94.44% of the children from the age bracket of 6-11 years old are
currently enrolled in our school (85 out of 90 children) and 7.78% from the age bracket of 6-9 years old
are enrolled in their residence’s nearby school. Those above 11 years old are currently enrolled in high
school, college and some are Out-of-School Youth. Based on barangay records, there are fifteen 5-
year-old-children accounted for in the barangay’s Day Care Center. These children’s residences are
within walking-distance to the school making the school accessible to them. The school’s kindergarten
programs offer school supplies, manipulative devices, and feedings sponsored by some school alumni.
The kindergarten classroom is also made to be hazard-free ensuring the safety of the children.
Table B.3 shows that there are learners in disadvantage situations where 17 are indigenous
children and 24 are low resources learners or 4Ps beneficiaries.
Table B.4 shows the enrolment by special needs where 21 are identified as having difficulty in
applying knowledge, 22 identified as difficulty in remembering, concentrating, paying attention and 1
having difficulty in communicating. This might be caused by pandemic where learners were not
assisted physically by teachers and parents cannot assist their children on their task. With these, the
school will somehow look for appropriate strategies giving specific focus on their needs. The school will
implement reading programs which will focus on difficulty in applying knowledge, difficulty in
remembering, concentrating, paying attention and understanding.
Table B.5 shows that there are no learners classified as coming from GIDA community.
.
10 | P a g e
B.7 Simple Dropout Rate by Grade Level by Gender, SY: 2017-2018, SY: 2018-2019,
SY: 2019-2020, SY: 2020-2021, SY: 2021-2022
B.7.1 Elementary
SY: 2017-2018 SY: 2018-2019 SY: 2019-2020 SY: 2020-2021 SY: 2021-2022
Grade Level
M F T M F T M F T M F T M F T
Kinder 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grade I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grade II 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grade III 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grade IV 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grade V 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grade VI 3.39 0 3.39 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grand Total 2.78 0 1.45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Table B.7.1 Shows comparative result of simple dropout rate from SY 2017-2018 up to SY
2021-2022. For five years, dropout rate occurred only in grade 6 for SY 2017-2018 with a rate of 3.39
for the grade level and 1.45 for the over all. These zero dropouts in the succeeding years is a result of
the feeding Program implemented by the school to PARDOs.
B.8.1 Elementary
Table B.8.1 shows the School Leavers for the school years SY 2017-2018 to SY 2021-2022 it
can be inferred that for five years, leavers occurred in SY 2018-2019 with 12.31, SY 2019-2020 with
leaver rate of 1.75 and for SY 2017-2018 with a rate of 0.76, respectively with other 2 …
11 | P a g e
B.9 Retention Rate by Gender, SY: 2018-2019, SY: 2019-2020, SY: 2020-2021, SY:2021-
2022, SY:2022-2023
B.9.1 Elementary
Table B.9.1 Shows comparative result of Retention Rate by Gender from SY 2017-2018 up to SY 2021-
2022. For five years, the highest overall retention rate occurred for SY 2022-2023 with a rate of 123.
However, the highest retention rate for females occurred on SY 2022-2023 with a rate of 127.4509 and
for the highest retention rate for males occurred on SY 2019-2020 with a rate of 125.581. It can be
inferred that the significant increase in retention rate is duly affected with the onset of the COVID-19
Pandemic.
Table B. 10.1a shows that the Transition Rate for 5 consecutive years, starting from SY 2018-
2019 up to SY 2022-2023. The transition rate for SYs 2019-2020, 2020-2021, and 2022-2023
exceeded to 100%. This is because some learners transferred in from other barangay’s and
municipalities.However, only 94.29% transitioned in the SY:2019-2020 and only 82.35%. for the SY:
2021-2022. SY 2018-2019 low transition rate is due to learners transferring residence because of the
12 | P a g e
Table B.9.1b shows that the Transition Rate for 5 consecutive year for Grades Three and Four,
starting from SY 2018-2019 up to SY 2022-2023. The transition rate for SYs 2020-2021, 2021- 2022
and 2022-2023 is 100% and beyond. This is because some learners transferred in from other
barangay’s and municipalities. However, only 94.12% transitioned in the SY:2018-2019 and only
95.00%. for the SY: 2019-2020. SY 2018-2019 low transition rate is due to learners transferring
residence because of the peace and order problems of their barangay. For SY 2019-2020 some lerners
transferred because of better economic opportunities in other place.
C. Quality
Table C.1a shows the Reading Assessment Result: EGRA by Grade Level in the first
component, Orientation to Print. The data presents only 54. 05% of the overall learners tested got 3
13 | P a g e
Table C.1b shows the Reading Assessment Result: EGRA by Grade Level in the second
component, Letter Name Knowledge. The data presents only 24.32% of the overall learners tested got
scores within the range 90-100 (18 out of 74), 16.21% got scores within the range 70-89 (12 out of 74),
22.97% got scores within the range 50-69 (14 out of 74), 12.16% got scores within the range 30-49 (9
out of 7), 9.46% got scores within the range 10- 29 (7 out of 74) and 18.92% got scores within the
range DC (14 out of 74).
Table C.1c shows the Reading Assessment Result: EGRA by Grade Level in the third
component, Letter Sound Knowledge. The data presents only 29.73% of the overall learners tested got
scores within the range 90-100 (22 out of 74), 22.97% got scores within the range 70-89 (14 out of 74),
12.16% got scores within the range 50-69 (9 out of 74), 13.51% got scores within the range 30-49 (10
out of 74), 9.46% got scores within the range 10- 29 (7 out of 74) and 16.22% got scores within the
range DC (12 out of 74).
Table C.1d shows the Reading Assessment Result: EGRA by Grade Level in the third
component, Letter Sound Knowledge. The data presents only 17.56% of the overall learners tested got
perfect score (13 out of 74), 10.81% got 8-9 scores (8 out of 74), 12.16% got 6-7 scores(9 out of 74),
8.11% got 4-5 scores(6 out of 74), 12.16% got 1-3 scores (9 out of 74) and 39.19% scored DC (29 out
of 74).
Table C.1e shows the Reading Assessment Result: EGRA by Grade Level in the fourth
component, Familiar Word Reading. The data presents …
Table C.1f shows the Reading Assessment Result: EGRA by Grade Level in the fifth component,
Invented Word Decoding. The data presents only 14.86% of the overall learners tested got 40-50 score
(11 out of 74), 12.16% got 30-39 scores (9 out of 74), 24.32% got 20-29 scores(18 out of 74), 8.11%
got 10-19 scores(6 out of 74), 12.16% got 1-3 scores (9 out of 74) and 28.38% scored DC (21 out of
74).
Table C.1f shows the Reading Assessment Result: EGRA by Grade Level in the sixth A
component, Oral Passage. The data presents only 8.11% of the overall learners tested got perfect
score (6 out of 74), 12.16% got 50 scores (9 out of 74), 17.56% got 40 scores(13 out of 74), 12.16% got
29 scores(9 out of 74), 9.46% got 19 scores (7 out of 74) , 4.05% got 10 scores (3 out of 74) and
36.49%% scored DC (27 out of 74).
C.2 Philippine Informal Reading Inventory Results in English and Filipino (Pretest), SY: 2022-
2023
Learners
Non-Reader Frustration Instructional Independent
Grade Level Tested
M F T M F T M F T M F T M F T
Grade 4 6 15 21 0 0 0 3 9 12 3 5 8 0 1 1
Grade 5 5 10 15 0 1 1 3 3 6 2 6 8 0 0 0
Grade 6 6 6 12 0 0 0 4 2 6 2 3 5 0 1 1
Total 17 31 48 0 1 1 10 14 24 7 14 21 0 2 2
Table C.2a Shows comparative results Grades 4 to 6 in Phil-IRI in English (Pretest) in the SY 2022-
2023. The data shows that 93.75% of the learners tested are concentrated in the Frustration level
garnering 24 pupils out of the 48 followed by 21 Instructional level learners and only 4.17% for
independent learners and 2.08% for Non-readers.
16 | P a g e
Learners
Non-Reader Frustration Instructional Independent
Grade Level Tested
M F T M F T M F T M F T M F T
Grade 4 6 15 21 0 0 0 3 3 6 3 11 14 0 1 1
Grade 5 5 10 15 0 1 1 3 2 5 2 7 9 0 0 0
Grade 6 6 6 12 0 0 0 3 1 3 3 4 7 0 1 1
Total 17 31 48 0 1 1 9 6 15 8 23 30 0 2 2
Table C.2b Shows comparative results Grades 4 to 6 in Phil-IRI in Filipino (Pretest) in the SY 2022-
2023. The data shows that 62.50% of the learners tested are concentrated in the Instructional level,
31.25% are on the frustration level, and only 4.17% for independent learners and 2.08% for Non-
readers.
C.3 Comparative Average Mean Percentage Score by Learning Area: Before and During
Pandemic School Years, SY: 2018-2019, SY: 2019-2020, SY: 2020-2021, SY: 2021-2022
SY: 2018- SY: 2019- SY: 2020- SY: 2021- Q1, SY:
Learning Area
2019 2020 2021 2022 2022-2023
MTB - MLE 69.61 75 72.91 75.39 71.00
Filipino 63.82 63.96 72.58 71.98 63.89
English 62.82 63.12 73.02 72.19 60.91
Mathematics 63.64 63.73 71.52 70.94 60.92
Science 64.78 68.83 75.23 76.27 60.72
Araling Panlipunan 64.70 64.86 74.1 73.56 64.73
17 | P a g e
Table C.3a Shows the Comparative Average Mean Percentage Score by Learning Area: Before and
During Pandemic School Years. The data show a notable high MPS rating during the Pandemic School
years (SY 2020-2021, SY 2021-2022). The employment of LAS as supplementary materials to modular
approach and the flexible time the learners have with the supervision of their parents and guardians are
believed to be the main reason for this significant improvement.
Low MPS rating before and after the pandemic, according to the grade levels’ respective teachers is
duly credited to a lack of teaching materials and resources, insufficient time for remedial lessons and
follow-up sessions with the parents, and the distance of the learners’ homes to school.
C.4 Division Achievement Test Mean Percentage Score by Learning Area, SY: 2021-2022
Table C.4a Division Achievement Test (DAT) MPS by Learning Area by Grade Level - Elementary
Table C.4 shows the Division Achievement Test Mean Percentage Score by Learning Area for SY:
2021-2022 in all grade levels. Only the ESP subject in all grade levels showed a notable average,
79.02 and only 65.61 for science. Limited time for supplemental and remedial lessons are deemed to
be the main reasons for low MPS results in most subjects.
Table C.4b Division Achievement Test (DAT) MPS by Learning Area by Grade Level - Secondary
18 | P a g e
Table C.4c Division Achievement Test (DAT) MPS by Learning Area - Secondary Senior High School
C.5 Regional Achievement Test Mean Percentage Score by Learning Area, SY: 2021-2022
Limited
Learning Area Modular Average
F2F
English
Filipino
Overall
Limited
Learning Area Modular Average
F2F
English
Math
Science
Filipino
Araling Panlipunan
TLE
MAPEH
EsP
Overall
SY: 2017 - SY: 2018 - SY: 2019 - SY: 2020 - SY: 2021 -
Learning Area 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
MTB (G1-G3) 60 49 44 49 54
Filipino (G1-G6) 121 98 93 97 98
English (G1-G6) 121 98 93 97 98
19 | P a g e
Math (G1-G6) 121 98 93 97 98
Table C.6a presents the number of learners achieved the minimum proficiency level in the five (5)
consecutive years in all learning areas. The data shows that there is no difference between the number
of learners achieves of the minimum proficiency and the total number of learners enrolled in each year.
D. INCLUSION/EQUITY
Litapan Elementary School is a Child- Friendly School which caters all types of learners and
the school aim that no one is left behind. Parents, learners, teachers and other stakeholders work
together for the common goal to achieve excellence.
For the past Two (2) years The Department of Education experienced the most difficult time
caused of the COVID -19. All schools have been shutdown. Schools have been normally used as
evacuation centers during and after a disaster, but in spite of the crises, education must not be
stopped. The school offers Modular Learning as means of ADM. Teachers doubled their time just to
give what is needed by learners making Learning Activity Sheets and checking of modules. Teachers
are burning their midnight candles just to ensure that learners could learned risking their health. It’s not
been easy but we are able to surpass all the trials.
E.1.a Elementary
Learners
Grade Learners Body Mass Index (BMI) Height for Age (HFA)
Enrollment Taken
Level Weighed
SW W N OW O Height SS S N T
Kinder 24
09/14/20
0 5 17 2 0
09/14/20
0 3 21 0
22 22
Grade I 19 2 1 16 0 0 0 2 16 1
Grade II 14 1 0 13 0 0 0 2 11 1
Grade III 17 0 1 16 0 0 0 2 15 0
Grade IV 21 0 0 19 2 0 1 2 18 0
Grade V 15 0 0 15 0 0 1 5 9 0
20 | P a g e
Table E.1.a shows the Nutritional Status of the learners for SY 2022-2023. The BMI data shows
87.70% of the total learners are normal, 2.50% are severely wasted, 6. 57% are wasting and 3.28% are
overweight. The HFA data shows 1.63% of the learners are severely stunted, 14. 75% stunted, 81.97% normal,
and only 1. 63% learners are tall. The feedings and sponsored community services by our stakeholders greatly
contributed to the overall well-being of our learners.
Cases of illness M F
Stomachache 15 20
Fever/ Headache 25 30
Diarrhea / LBM 5 7
Dry Cough/ Runny
15 17
Nose
There were no records of bullying cases in the school since the school implements the Child-
Friendly School Policy. The school seek an excellence of endeavour that learners will be in harmony
with each other.
E.4 School Hazards
A classroom environment is very significant to health and safety issues of every learners. So
all potential that can cause damaged to life and properties must be addressed properly.
Due to the Pandemic that we experienced for the last Two (2) years which brought out
physical, mental and emotional stress within the school tried to cope up in order that teachers and
learners will be ready as to implement the face- to- face classes. Teachers attended series of seminars
like psychosocial activities to debrief themselves and be ready to face their learners. Learners also
were given the same activities for them to cope up the same dilemma for them to be physically,
emotionally and mentally ready.
F. GOVERNANCE
The school cannot stand alone without the support of it’s stakeholders both internal and
external.
IV. PLAN
Goal
All Filipinos are able to realize their full potential and contribute meaningfully to cohesive
nation.
Sector outcome
Basic education Filipino learners have the physical, cognitive, socio-emotional and moral preparation
for civic participation and engagement in post secondary opportunities in local, national, and global
communities.
Intermediate Outcome
1. Access
2. Equity
3. Quality
4. Resiliency and well-being
5. Enabling Mechanism- governance
22 | P a g e
Baseline
Indicator 2023 2024 2025
Data
Pillar 1. ACCESS
IO1 - All school-age children, out-of-school youth, and adults have access to relevant basic learning
opportunities
IO1.1 - All five-year old children attend school
Gross Enrollment Rate
Enrollment 122 128 134 140
Net Enrollment Rate
Enrollment of School-Age Children 94.44% 95.44% 95.5% 95.6%
Net Intake Rate
Kindergarten Enrollment 24 25 26 27
Percentage mapped 5-year old in school 83.52% 84.41% 85.07% 85.96%
Percentage mapped School-aged children in school 84.41% 85.3% 86.19% 87.08%
IO1.2 - All learners stay in school
Retention Rate 122.00% 123.01% 124.02 125.01
Simple Dropout Rate 0% 0% 0% 0%
School Leaver Rate -0.86% -0.89% -0.90% -0.91%
IO1.3 - All learners transition to the next key stage
Transition Rate
Transition: Kinder to Grade 1 101.75% 102% 103% 104%
* Grade 3 to Grade 4 103.13% 104% 105% 106%
IO1.4 - All out -of-school children and youth participate in formal or non-formal basic education learning
opportunities
Participation Rate of OSC and OSY - - -
ALS Completion Rate - - -
Baseline
Indicator 2023 2024 2025
Data
Pillar 2. EQUITY
IO2 - School-age children and youth, and adults in situations of disadvantage benefited from appropriate
equity initiatives
IO2.1 - All school-age children and youth and adults in situations of disadvantage are participating in inclusive
basic learning opportunities and receiving appropriate quality education
Elem: Percentage of Disparity in Transition rate 1.00 1.00 1.00
Sec: Percentage of Disparity in Transition Rate
Retention Rate of Learners from GIDA 0 0 0
Reading Literacy: Percentage of Learners with at least the
- - -
minimum level of proficiency
23 | P a g e
Baseline
Indicator 2023 2024 2025
Data
Pillar 3. QUALITY
IO3 - Learners complete K-12 basic education having attained all learning standards that equip them with
necessary skills and attributes and are confident to pursue their chosen paths
IO3.1 - Learners attain Stage 1 (K-Grade 3) learning standards of fundamental reading and numeracy skills to
provide basis for success in the remaining learning stages
Percentage
Percentage of learners are numerates
Percentage of learners achieving at the least
minimum level of proficiency
* MTB - MLE 100% 100% 100% 100%
* Filipino 100% 100% 100% 100%
* English 100% 100% 100% 100%
* Mathematics 100% 100% 100% 100%
* Science 100% 100% 100% 100%
* Araling Panlipunan 100% 100% 100% 100%
* Edukasyon sa Pagpapakatao 100% 100% 100% 100%
* EPP/TLE
100% 100% 100% 100%
* MAPE
IO3.2 - Learners attain stage 2 (Grades 4-6) learning standards in required literacy and numeracy skills
applying 21st century skills to various real-life situations
Percentage of learners at independent reading level
Percentage of learners are numerates
Graduation Rate
Repetition Rate
IO3.3 - Learners attain Stage 3 (Grades 7-10) learning standards of literacy and numeracy skills and apply
21st century skills to various real-life situations
IO3.4 - Learners attain Stage 4 (Grades 11-12) learning standards equipped with knowledge and 21st century
skills developed in chosen core, applied and specialized SHS tracks
IO3.5 - Learners in the Alternative Learning System attain certification as Elementary or Junior High School
completers
Baseline
Indicator 2023 2024 2025
Data
Pillar 4. RESILIENCE AND WELL-BEING
IO4 - Learners are resilient and aware of their rights to and in education are respected, protected, fulfilled and
promoted while being aware of their responsibilities as individuals and as members of society
IO4.1 - Learners are served by a Department that adheres to a rights-based education framework at all levels
Strategy 1. Integrate children’s and learners’ rights in the design of all DepEd policies, plans, programs,
projects, processes and systems
Learners satisfaction rating on Rights-based Education
Strategy 2. Ensure that learners know their rights and have the life skills to claim their education-related rights
from DepEd and other duty-bearers to promote learners’ well-being, while also being aware of their
responsibilities as individuals and as members of society
Safety Seal Certificate
IO4.2 - Learners are safe and protected, and can protect themselves from risks and impacts from natural and
human induced hazards
Strategy 3. Protecting learners and personnel from death, injury and harm brought by natural and human-
induced hazards
School hazards
Strategy 5. Protect education investments from the impacts of natural and human-induced hazards
IO4.3 - Learners have the basic physical, mental and emotional fortitude to cope with various challenges in life
Strategy 6. Provide learners with basic health and nutritional services
Nutritional Status
Weight 87.70 91.8 95.9 100%
Height 81.97 88 94.01 100%
Cases of Illness
Health Statistics
Strategy 7. Nurturing and protecting learners’ mental and psychosocial health
25 | P a g e
Baseline
Indicator 2023 2024 2025
Data
Enabling Mechanism: GOVERNANCE AND MANAGEMENT
IO5 - Efficient, agile, and resilient governance and management processes
EM1. Ensure all education leaders and managers practice participative, ethical, and inclusive management
processes
School Based Management Level of Practice 1.566 1.570 1.580 1.590
EM2. All personnel are resilient, competent, and continuously improving
OPCRF Rating 4.43 4.44 4.45 4.46
EM3. Ideal learning environment and adequate learning resources for learners ensured
Learner-Classroom Ratio 1:17 1:18 1:19 1:20
Learner-Teacher Ratio 1:15 1:16 1:17 1:18
Learner-Seat Ratio 1:1 1:1 1:1 1:1
Child Friendly School Program
Learning Resources
Learners Materials 1:2 1:1 1:1 1:1
Connection to Electricity 1:1 1:1 1:1 1:1
Connection to Internet - - - -
Availability of Water 1:1 1:1 1:1 1:1
Utility services
EM4. Improve and modernize internal systems and processes for a responsive and efficient financial
resource management
MOOE Utilization 100% 100% 100% 100%
Other Funds Utilization 100% 100% 100% 100%
All activities identified in the Annual Implementation Plan shall appear also in the Monitoring and
Evaluation Plan
26 | P a g e
Notes:
1. Follow the “No Spacing” format of every paragraph.
2. Font style: Arial Narrow; Font color: Black; Font size: Narratives = 12, Data and Tables = 11.
3. Observe one space after every paragraph, and two spaces after every section or as adjustments be
made when doing Face Validity.
4. Do not separate the interpretations to its corresponding table in a page if possible.
5. For tables that have long array of data, divide proportionately the rows of the table and its
interpretation in the pages it may occupy whenever possible.
6. Remove all instructions in font color red when you finalize this document.
27 | P a g e