Culminating Performance Task (CPT) Rubric Name : _____________________________ Date: __________________

Title: ______________________________________________

Levels & LEVEL 1: Poor LEVEL 2: Satisfactory LEVEL 3: Good LEVEL 4: Excellent
Criteria: (50-59%) (60-69%) (70-79%) (80-100%)
-Key information from the -The chapter’s main information -The chapter’s main information -The chapter’s main information
chapter is missing. The is mostly present, but may not be is appropriately summarized. The is concisely and excellently
chapter notes may be in your own words. The chapter chapter notes are of reasonable summarized. The chapter notes
Knowledge &
copied / pasted from text, or notes may be far too long, or too length. are neither too long nor too
Under-standing
other sources, lacking short. -The concepts are mostly present short.
summary, or far too short. -The concepts may be muddled and clear -The concepts are extremely
-Chapter
-The concepts are often or unclear -Explanation of concepts, terms clear
Information
unaddressed or unclear. -Explanation of concepts, terms and ideas from your chapter are -Explanation of key concepts,
-Explanation of
-Explanation of, terms and and ideas from your chapter are mostly accurate and relevant. terms and ideas from your
concepts, terms,
ideas from your chapter are present, but occasionally chapter are accurate, concise,
ideas
included, but they are inaccurate or unrelated. and highly relevant.
inaccurate, unclear, or
unrelated.

-The assignment is only -The assignment is complete, but -The assignment is somewhat -The assignment is thoughtful,
partially complete, and lacks lacks thoughtfulness – does the thoughtful, allows students to engaging, and a fun way for
Thinking &
thoughtfulness – does not bare minimum to apply learning. demonstrate learning, but in a students to demonstrate
Inquiry
provide a good opportunity -Overall presentation of pretty basic way. learning.
for learning. information appears rushed at -Overall presentation of -Overall presentation of
-Assignment
-Overall presentation of times, was lacking planning, or information appears mostly information is extremely well
-Organization &
information was rushed and disorganized in execution. planned and somewhat organized planned out and executed in an
Preparedness
lacked planning; execution in execution. organized and thoughtful
was very disorganized. manner.

-Written information (chapter -Written information (chapter -Written information (chapter -All written information
Communication notes, definitions, notes, definitions, explanations) notes, definitions, explanations) (chapter notes, definitions,
explanations) is unclear and are somewhat unclear and are mostly well written and explanations) are well written,
-Written difficult to understand due to difficult to understand due to understandable, but have some have no grammatical errors,
information numerous writing and writing and grammatical errors. writing and grammatical errors. and are clear and easy to
-Presentation grammatical errors. - Late submission of assignment -Assignment submitted on time understand.
-Very late submission of -The presentation was somewhat -The presentation of information - Assignment submitted on
assignment clear, but occasionally difficult to was mostly clear and time
-The presentation was often understand. understandable. -The presentation of
unclear and difficult to information was extremely clear
understand. and understandable.
 LEVEL 1: Poor LEVEL 2: Satisfactory LEVEL 3: Good LEVEL 4: Excellent
(50-59%) (60-69%) (70-79%) (80-100%)

Application -Focused approx. 60% or less -Focused approximately 70% or -Focused approximately 80% or -Stayed focused and on track
of the time, occasionally using less of the time, sometimes using less of the time, usually using 90%+ of the time, using class
-Use of class class time to complete the class time appropriately. class time appropriately and time appropriately and
time project. -The presentation was either too effectively. effectively.
-Presentation -The presentation was too long or too short, and was -The presentation was of -The presentation was a good
length and short, and often unappealing inconsistently engaging. appropriate length, and was length – concise and clear while
engagement and not engaging. mostly interesting and engaging. covering key information, and
was interesting and engaging.