Group 1 CBM 131
Group 1 CBM 131
MASTER TAG
Group 1
Members:
Dayot, Leonora Telebes
Tagoy, Carla Jane M.
Lino, Rhea
Apostol, Mark Herby
Pangalaya, Ezabelle
Magunalig, Clark Wensiel
Mancing, Kirsten
Garing, Micay Julienne
Unhappy customers.
Point of view
We take the point of view of the master tags would be better communication and supply
Master Tag’s previous approach clearly shows that they lack contact and communication
with the growers. With the revised approach, Mastertag will be able to reduce the
quantity of leftover tags and increase the company's productivity. This could be possible
because they will be in direct contact with the growers and have exact quantities needed
Areas of consideration
The demand of the seed companies did not match the supply of the company because its
The key benefit of the revised approach would be better communication and supply chain
management.
They decided that they must come up with a better solution for achieving a match
between supply and demand of the tags. One possible solution would be to make an
initial, fairly large batch, which would be produced and shipped directly to the growers
instead of the seed companies, as is now being done. Later, when the grower results
became available, a second batch would be produced using information from growers on
how many additional tags are needed. The second batch would then be made and shipped
to the growers.
Recommendation
Both the growers and the master tag companies must always keep on touch of each other,
so that there will be no more waste of tag if there will be a uncertain amount of seed plant
grow.
Plan of action
Demand and supply can be matched by analysis how many plants are left in the grower