Scribd
Upload
192 views3 pages

Assisngment Assessment of Learning - Umbina

This document contains an assignment on converting and interpreting various test scores. It provides examples of converting a raw score of 42 out of 50 to a percentage score of 84%, a z-score of 2, a t-score of 70, a stanine score of 9, and a percentile rank of 97.72%. It also asks students to interpret test scores for Susan and two classmates, Raquel and three other students, converting their raw scores to other equivalent scores and providing short interpretations.

Uploaded by

Ges Moleta
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
192 views3 pages

Assisngment Assessment of Learning - Umbina

This document contains an assignment on converting and interpreting various test scores. It provides examples of converting a raw score of 42 out of 50 to a percentage score of 84%, a z-score of 2, a t-score of 70, a stanine score of 9, and a percentile rank of 97.72%. It also asks students to interpret test scores for Susan and two classmates, Raquel and three other students, converting their raw scores to other equivalent scores and providing short interpretations.

Uploaded by

Ges Moleta
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

Name: UMBINA, GESCERY MOLETA

Course Title: Assessment of Learning 1 – 2ND Semester


Date: February 18, 2023
Time Schedule: Saturday 1:00-5:00P.M.

ASSIGNMENT: COVERSION AND INTERPRETATION OF SCORES


It is important for any teacher to be able to convert a raw score to a
percentage score, a standard score or a percentile rank, and afterwards
make sensible description of such score.

1. Susan obtained a raw score of 42 out of 50. The mean is 32 and the
standard deviation is 5. Convert the raw score to the following:

a. Percentage Score = 84%


Solution:
Percentage Score = (Raw Score/Total Number of Items
= (42/50) * 100
= 0.84*100
= 84

b. z-score = 2
Solution:
Z = (x-µ)/s
= (42-32)/5
= 10/5
=2

c. T-score = 70
Solution:
T = 10z + 50
= 10(2) + 50
= 20+50
= 70
d. Stanine Score = 9
Solution:
Stanine = 2z+5
= 2(2) + 5
= 4+5
=9

e. Percentile Rank = 97.72% or 98%

Write a short interpretation of Susan’s performance based on the percentile


rank and computed standard scores. Use the space below.

Answer:

It is evident that Susan’s score is better than 97.72% of


students in the sample. We could also notice that her score is in the
upper 2.28% of the norm group. A percentile rank of 97.72 indicates
that Susan scored higher than 49 students, if there were 50 students
who took the test.

2. Raquel obtains a score of 30/50 in her Social Studies test and 24/40 in
her Math test.

Social Studies: x=28; s=4


Mathematics: x=20; s=5

On which test did she do better compared to the rest of the class? Explain
your answer.

Data Interpretation/Tabulation:

Test Raw Percentage Percentile z-score t-score Stanine


Score correct Rank
Social 30 60% 69.15% 0.5 30 6
Studies
Mathematics 24 60% 78.81% 0.8 50 7

Explanation:
In Social Studies, Raquel scored better than 69.15% of students in
the sample. On the other hand, her score is in the30.85% of the
norm group. In Mathematics, Raquel scored better than 78.81% of
students in the sample. In other words, her score is in the upper
21.19% of the norm group. This observation suggests that Raquel is
better in Mathematics compared to the rest of the class.

3. Complete the table by giving the equivalent score. Provide a short


interpretation of the underlined score.
Test information:
Periodical test in Mathematics
Total items = 40
Mean = 27
Standard Deviation = 6

Raw Percentil z- t-
Studen Percentag stanin
Scor e scor scor Interpretation
t e correct e
e Rank e e
The student’s score is
A 15 37.5% 2% -2 30 1 in the lower2.28% of
the norm group.

The student scored


higher than 20
students; or the
B 27 67.5% 50% 0 50 5
student’s score is in
the upper 50% of the
norm group.

The student’s score is


in the lower 6.68% of
C 18 45% 6.68% -1.5 35 2 the norm group; hence
the student performed
below the average.

The student’s score is


above 84% of the
D 33 82.5% 84% 1 60 7 scores hence, he/she
performed above the
average.

The student’s score is


better than 97.72% of
the students in the
E 39 97.5% 98% 2 70 9
sample hence, he/she
performed above the
average.

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy