The document contains classification results from models trained with different types and levels of faults:
1) It evaluates SVM, ensemble, and KNN classifiers on data with 20%, 40%, 60%, 80%, and 100% levels of R (random), Y (y-flip), B (border), and combined faults.
2) For each fault level and type, it reports metrics like true positives, false positives, accuracy, precision, and recall.
3) KNN generally performed best with highest accuracy, precision, and recall scores across different fault scenarios. SVM and ensemble methods worked reasonably well except at higher fault levels.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
33 views9 pages
Precision Recall
The document contains classification results from models trained with different types and levels of faults:
1) It evaluates SVM, ensemble, and KNN classifiers on data with 20%, 40%, 60%, 80%, and 100% levels of R (random), Y (y-flip), B (border), and combined faults.
2) For each fault level and type, it reports metrics like true positives, false positives, accuracy, precision, and recall.
3) KNN generally performed best with highest accuracy, precision, and recall scores across different fault scenarios. SVM and ensemble methods worked reasonably well except at higher fault levels.