Design of A Multi Storied Steel Building
Design of A Multi Storied Steel Building
16 14 14 3
C1 B1 C2 B2 C3 B3 C4
7
B4 B5 B6 B7
C5 C6 C7 C8 C9
7
B20 B22
14 B19 (S4) C10 C11 B23 (S5) B24
(S11) (S9)
B21
C12 C13 C14 C15 C16
B8 B9 B10 B11
Building Plan
(3) (4)
C1 C2 C3 C4
B1 B2 B3
3 1 1
B15 B16 B17 B18
B4 B5 B6 B7
C5 C6 C7 C8 C9
B20 B22
2
B19 B23 B24
C10 C11
B21
(1) B8 B9 B10 B11
C12 C13 C14 C15 C16
3 1 1
B25 B26 B27 B28
(8.6,-6.4,-15.1,2.2,-7.3) (10.2,-9.8,-22.4,13.8,-20.0)
(12.1,-12.6,-28.1,19.3,-31.8) (6.7,-8.3,-7.2,3.2,-13.0)
B8 B9 B10 B11
Beam (SF1, SF2 (k), BM1, BM0, BM2 (k )) and Column (AF (k), BM1, BM2 (k )) in
Frame (1) from Vertical Load Analysis
Frame (2) [B12-13-14]:
Slab-load on B12 = [13/2×(16+3)/2]× 0.136 = 8.40 k
Equivalent UDL (+ Self Wt. and EW) 8.40/16 + 0.03 + 0.90 = 1.45 k/
Slab-load on B13 = [13/2×(14+1)/2]×0.136 = 6.63k
Equivalent UDL (+ Self Wt. and EW) 6.63/14 + 0.03 + 0.90 = 1.40 k/
Load from Slabs to B14 = [13/2×(14+1)/2]× 0.136 = 6.63k
Equivalent UDL (+ Self Wt. and EW) 6.63/14 + 0.03 + 0.90 = 1.40 k/
(9.9,-9.7,-24.3,10.8,-22.7)
(11.2,-12.0,-25.8,17.6,-31.8) (10.2,-9.4,-23.8,12.9,-18.9)
Beam (SF1, SF2 (k), BM1, BM0, BM2 (k )) and Column (AF (k), BM1, BM2 (k )) in
Frame (2) from Vertical Load Analysis
Frame (3) [B16-20-21-26]:
Slab-load on B16 and B26 = [13/2×(13)/2+13/2×(13)/2]× 0.136 = 11.49 k
Equivalent UDL (+ Self Wt. and PW) 11.49/13 + 0.03 + 0.45 = 1.36 k/
Slab-load on B20-21 [14/2×(14)/2]× 0.136 = 6.66 k
Equivalent UDL (+ Self Wt. and PW) 6.66/14 + 0.03 + 0.45 = 0.96 k/
(4.0,-2.8,-7.5,0.6,-3.4) (9.0,-8.7,-18.0,11.7,-16.1)
(8.7,-9.0,-16.1,11.7,-18.0) (2.8,- 4.0,-3.4,0.6, -7.5)
Beam (SF1, SF2 (k), BM1, BM0, BM2 (k )) and Column (AF (k), BM1, BM2 (k )) in
Frame (3) from Vertical Load Analysis
Frame (4) [B17-23-27]:
Slab-load on B17 and B27 = [13/2×(13)/2+13/2×(13)/2]× 0.136 = 11.49 k
Equivalent UDL (+ Self Wt. and PW) 11.49/13 + 0.03 + 0.45 = 1.36 k/
Slab-load on B23 = [14/2×(14)/2]× 0.136 = 6.66k
Equivalent UDL (+ Self Wt., EW, S9) 6.66/14 + 0.03 + 0.90 + 3 × 0.136 = 1.81 k/
[Here, the EW is considered because the exterior beam B24 is more critical. It has the
same slab load as B23 in addition to self-weight and EW]
(12.7,-12.7,-28.6,15.7,-28.6)
(8.3,-9.4,-15.0,10.3,-22.0) (9.4,-8.3,-22.0,10.3, -15.0)
C3 C8 C15 C19
Beam (SF1, SF2 (k), BM1, BM0, BM2 (k )) and Column (AF (k), BM1, BM2 (k )) in
Frame (4) from Vertical Load Analysis
Frame [B4-5-6-7]:
Similar to Frame (1) [B8-9-10-11].
(8.6,-6.4,-15.1,2.2,-7.3) (10.2,-9.8,-22.4,13.8,-20.0)
(12.1,-12.6,-28.1,19.3,-31.8) (6.7,-8.3,-7.2,3.2,-13.0)
B4 B5 B6 B7
C5 C6 C7 C8 C9
Beam (SF1, SF2 (k), BM1, BM0, BM2 (k )) and Column (AF (k), BM1, BM2 (k )) in
Frame [B4-5-6-7] from Vertical Load Analysis
Frame [B1-2-3]:
Similar to Frame (2) [B12-13-14].
(9.9,-9.7,-24.3,10.8,-22.7)
(11.2,-12.0,-25.8,17.6,-31.8) (10.2,-9.4,-23.8,12.9,-18.9)
B1 B2 B3
C1 C2 C3 C4
Beam (SF1, SF2 (k), BM1, BM0, BM2 (k )) and Column (AF (k), BM1, BM2 (k )) in
Frame [B1-2-3] from Vertical Load Analysis
Frame [B15-19-25]:
Similar to Frame (4) [B17-23-27].
(12.7,-12.7,-28.6,15.7,-28.6)
(8.3,-9.4,-15.0,10.3,-22.0) (9.4,-8.3,-22.0,10.3, -15.0)
C1 C5 C12 C17
Beam (SF1, SF2 (k), BM1, BM0, BM2 (k )) and Column (AF (k), BM1, BM2 (k )) in
Frame [B15-19-25] from Vertical Load Analysis
Frame [B18-24-28]:
Similar to Frame (4) [B17-23-27].
(12.7,-12.7,-28.6,15.7,-28.6)
(8.3,-9.4,-15.0,10.3,-22.0) (9.4,-8.3,-22.0,10.3, -15.0)
C4 C9 C16 C20
Beam (SF1, SF2 (k), BM1, BM0, BM2 (k )) and Column (AF (k), BM1, BM2 (k )) in
Frame [B18-24-28] from Vertical Load Analysis
3. Lateral Load Analysis of Beams and Columns
Seismic Coefficients: Z = 0.15, I = 1.0, S = 1.0, R = 6.0, C = 1.25 S/T2/3 2.75
where T = Fundamental period of vibration = 0.083×h¾ [h = Building Height in meters]
For the moment resisting steel frame, T = 0.083×(40/3.28)¾ = 0.542 sec
C = 1.25 S/T2/3 = 1.25×1.0/(0.542)2/3 = 1.88
Base Shear, V = (ZIC/R) W = 0.15×1.0×1.88/6.0 W = 0.0470W
Since T <0.7 sec, Ft = 0; For equally loaded stories without Ft, Fi = (hi/ hi)V
F1 = 0.1V, F2 = 0.2V, F3 = 0.3V, F4 = 0.4V
Frame (1) [B8-9-10-11]:
W = 4×(1.54×16+2.14×7+2.14×7+1.43×14) = 298k V = 0.0470W = 14.03k
5.61k
4.21k
2.81k
(4.9,-17.7,16.4) (1.9,-12.0,14.3)
(1.5,-12.9,10.9) (4.8,-16.4,17.4)
1.40k
B8 B9 B10 B11
(-9.5,17.9,-13.3) (8.3,18.1,-13.6)
(-4.3,14.6,-6.7) (0.1,18.6,-15.1) (5.4,15.0,-7.3)
Beam (SF(k), BM1, BM2 (k )) and Column (AF (k), BM1, BM2 (k )) in
Frame (1) from Lateral Load Analysis
Frame (2) [B12-13-14]:
W = 4×(1.45×16+1.40×14+1.40×14) = 249.60k V = 0.0470W = 11.73k
4.69k
3.52k
2.35k
Beam (SF(k), BM1, BM2 (k )) and Column (AF (k), BM1, BM2 (k )) in
Frame (2) from Lateral Load Analysis
Frame (3) [B16-20-21-26]:
W = 4×(1.36×13+0.96×7+0.96×7+1.36×13) = 195.20k V = 0.0470W = 9.17k
3.67k
2.75k
1.83k
(3.0,-10.9,10.4) (1.3,-8.0,9.5)
(1.3,-9.5,8.0) (3.0,-10.4,10.9)
0.92k
B16 B20 B21 B26
(-4.7,11.6,-8.9) (4.7,11.7,-8.9)
(-3.9,9.6,-4.9) (0.,12.0,-9.6) (3.9,9.7,-4.9)
Beam (SF(k), BM1, BM2 (k )) and Column (AF (k), BM1, BM2 (k )) in
Frame (3) from Lateral Load Analysis
Frame (4) [B17-23-27]:
W = 4×(1.36×13+1.81×14+1.36×13) = 242.80k V = 0.0470W = 11.41k
4.57k
3.42k
2.28k
C3 C8 C15 C19
Beam (SF(k), BM1, BM2 (k )) and Column (AF (k), BM1, BM2 (k )) in
Frame (4) from Lateral Load Analysis
Frame [B4-5-6-7]:
Similar to Frame (1) [B8-9-10-11].
(4.9,-17.7,16.4) (1.9,-12.0,14.3)
(1.5,-12.9,10.9) (4.8,-16.4,17.4)
B4 B5 B6 B7
(-9.5,17.9,-13.3) (8.3,18.1,-13.6)
(-4.3,14.6,-6.7) (0.1,18.6,-15.1) (5.4,15.0,-7.3)
C5 C6 C7 C8 C9
Beam (SF (k), BM1, BM2 (k )) and Column (AF (k), BM1, BM2 (k )) in
Frame [B4-5-6-7] from Lateral Load Analysis
Frame [B1-2-3]:
Similar to Frame (2) [B12-13-14].
B1 B2 B3
C1 C2 C3 C4
Beam (SF (k), BM1, BM2 (k )) and Column (AF (k), BM1, BM2 (k )) in
Frame [B1-2-3] from Lateral Load Analysis
Frame [B15-19-25]:
Similar to Frame (4) [B17-23-27].
C1 C5 C12 C17
Beam (SF (k), BM1, BM2 (k )) and Column (AF (k), BM1, BM2 (k )) in
Frame [B15-19-25] from Lateral Load Analysis
Frame [B18-24-28]:
Similar to Frame (4) [B17-23-27].
C4 C9 C16 C20
Beam (SF (k), BM1, BM2 (k )) and Column (AF (k), BM1, BM2 (k )) in
Frame [B18-24-28] from Lateral Load Analysis
4. Combination of Vertical and Lateral Loads
The Design Force (i.e., AF, SF or BM) will be the maximum between the following two
combinations
(i) Vertical Force = DL+LL
(ii) Combined Vertical and Lateral Force = 0.75 (DL+LL+EQ); i.e., 0.75 times the
combined force from Vertical and Lateral Load Analysis.
The design Shear Forces and Bending Moments for various beams are calculated below
using the two options mentioned above.
Other Beams:
1. Beam B22 -
Approximately designed as a simply supported beam under similar load as B20.
Maximum SF 0.96 7/2 = 3.36 k
and Maximum positive BM 0.96 72/8 = 5.88 k
2. Edge Beam for S10 -
Uniformly distributed load on S10 = 0.103 ksf
Uniformly distributed load on Edge Beam = 0.103 5 = 0.51 k/
Clear Span = 13 Vmax 0.51×(13)/2 = 3.3 k; M 0.51×(13)2/10 = 8.6 k
4.2 Load Combination for Columns
The column forces are shown below as [AF (k), BM1y, BM1x (k )]
Columns Frame (V) (Lx) 0.75(V+Lx) 0.75(V-Lx) (Ly) 0.75(V+Ly) 0.75(V-Ly)
-78.7, -5.7, -63.3, -54.8, -7.4, -64.6, -53.5,
C1, C17 2, 4
5.3, 3.2 17.2, 0 16.9, 2.4 -8.9, 2.4 0, 16.7 4.0, 14.9 4.0, -10.1
-122.4, -0.6, -92.3, -91.4, -3.9, -97.4, -86.3,
C2, C18 2, 3
-1.7, 3.4 19.9, 0 13.7, 2.6 -16.2, 2.6 0, 9.6 -1.3, 15.1 -1.3, 10.0
-112.8, -0.8, -85.2, -84.0, -7.4, -90.2, -79.1,
C3, C19 2, 4
0.1, -3.2 20.2, 0 15.2, -2.4 15.1, -2.4 0, 16.8 0.1, 10.2 0.1, -15.0
-71.7, 7.1, -7.4,
C4, C20 2, 4
-4.1, -3.2 17.6, 0 0, 16.7
-126.3, -4.3, 1.7,
C5, C12 1, 4
5.8, 1.4 14.6, 0 0, 19.1
-132.5, -9.5, -4.7,
C6, C13 1, 3
-3.5, -2.1 17.9, 0 0, 11.6
-55.2, 0.1, 0.,
C7, C14 1
-0.1, 0 18.6, 0 0, 0.
-160.1, 8.3, -113.9, -126.3, 1.7, -118.8, -121.4,
C8, C15 1, 4
1.8, 1.4 18.1, 0 14.9, 1.1 -12.2, 1.1 0, 19.1 1.4, 15.4 1.4, -13.3
-127.3, 5.4, 1.7,
C9, C16 1, 4
-4.3, 1.4 15.0, 0 0, 19.1
-25.5, 0, 0.,
C10 3
0, 0 0, 0 0, 12.0
C11 - - - - - - - -
In this work, only one size will be chosen for all the columns. For this purpose, the
columns (C8, C15) are chosen as the model because they provide the most critical design
conditions.
The designed column should therefore satisfy the following design conditions,
(1) Compressive Force = 160.1k, Bending Moments BM1x = 1.4 k , BM1y = 1.8 k .
(2) Compressive Force = 113.9k, Bending Moments BM1x = 1.1 k , BM1y = 14.9 k .
(3) Compressive Force = 118.8k, Bending Moments BM1x = 15.4 k , BM1y = 1.4 k .
5. Design of Beams
The figure below shows an I-section, which has been chosen here for all the beams.
y
tf
bf = Width of flange
tw tf = Thickness of flange
dw dw = Depth of web
x x
tf = Thickness of web
tf
y
bf
L = 16 L=7 L=7 L = 14
The design shear forces (k) are
L = 16 L = 14 L = 14
The design shear forces (k) are
L = 13 L=7 L=7 L = 13
The design shear forces (k) are
L = 13 L = 14 L = 13
The design shear forces (k) are
fc = Fc/A
Slenderness Ratio, = Le/rmin, and c = (2E/f y)
If c, fall(c) = fy [1 0.5 ( / c)2]/[5/3 + 3/8 ( / c) 1/8( / c)3]
2
If c, fall(c) = 0.52 ( E/ 2) ………………………(6.1(a)~6.1(d))
The acceptable design condition is fc fall(c); i.e., fc/fall(c) 1
For the material properties used for design; i.e., E = 29000 ksi, f y = 40 ksi
c = (2E/f y) = 119.63, = / c= /119.63
If 1, fall(c) = 40 (1 0.5 2)/(5/3 + 3 /8 3
/8)
2 2
If 1, fall(c) = 149000/ = 10.4/ ………………………(6.2(a)~6.2(d))
(2) Members under combined compression and biaxial bending
fc/fall(c) + fbx/fall(bx) + fby/fall(by) 1 ……………………(6.3)
The stresses fc and fall(c) are obtained from Eqs. (6.1) and (6.2)
fbx = Bending stress about x-axis = Mx(mag)/Zxx
Here Mx(mag) is the bending moment about x-axis magnified by the axial force, and it
is given by Mx(mag) = Mx [Cmx/(1 fc/fall(ex))]
where Cmx = 1.0 for unrestrained members, and
2 2
fall(ex) is the allowable Euler stress about x-axis; i.e., fall(ex) = 0.52 ( E/ x )
tf bf = Width of flange
tf = Thickness of flange
tw
dw = Depth of web
dw x x tf = Thickness of web
tf
bf
The section is the strongest about x-axis and weakest about y-axis; therefore case (ii)
provides the most critical design condition here [in this case, it is even more critical than
case (i)].
This needs to be kept in consideration while choosing the orientation of the column
section in the building plan, so that bending moment about the weakest axis is kept as
small as possible. In case of the building designed, with an almost square-shaped plan,
this does not affect the design significantly. But for highly elongated plans (high L/B
ratio), weakest axis of the section should not coincide with the weakest axis of the plan.
7. Design of Connections
The following sample connections will be designed for illustration.
1. A moment-resisting connection between column C8 and beam B7 will be designed for
shear force 10.2k and negative bending moment of 25.8 k .
2. A base slab for column C8 and the footing underneath will be designed for column
axial force of 160.1k
For the shear force of 10.2k, which is not considered too high, an unstiffened seat
connection is designed at the bottom of the beam.
The length of web (B) required to transfer the force without web crippling of beam is
B = R/ p tw = 10.2/(0.75 40 0.27) = 1.26
Thickness of beam flange, tf = 0.426 .