Leaf Area Estimation of Anacardium Humile
Leaf Area Estimation of Anacardium Humile
1590/0100-29452020628
Economy
Abstract - The Anacardium humile A. St.- Hil. fruit tree has productive potential, being their
fruits appreciated in the Cerrado region for having characteristic flavor, however, this species is
still exploited in an extractive way, being necessary studies for its domestication. The aim of this
work was to estimate the leaf area of Anacardium humile. One hundred leaves were collected in the
biological collection from a genetic resources field and evaluated for length, width and fresh weight,
and scanned at resolution of 300 dpi to determine the leaf area with the aid of the ImageJ image
analysis program. Subsequently, a leaf disc with a diameter of 22.27 mm was detached at the basal
portion of each leaf, in which the fresh weight of the discs was obtained. Data were submitted to
descriptive analysis and the relationship among the features explained by Pearson’s correlation with
the software Rbio. The data were also subjected to regression analysis to explain the relationship
between leaf area and measurements of width, length and leaf weight, and to fit the proper statistical
model with the software Origin. It was concluded that leaf area can be determined by image analysis
software and linear measurements are correlated to leaf area.
Index terms: Cajuzinho-do-cerrado, native fruits, species conservation.
1
Agronomist, master in Agronomy, Universidade Federal de Jataí, Jataí – GO, Brazil. E-mail: fram_rodgomes@hotmail.com(ORCID 0000-0001-
7282-0719)
2
Agronomist, PhD in Plant Science, professor at Universidade Federal de Jataí, Academic department of agrarian sciences, Jataí – GO, Brazil.
E-mail: daniellefpsilva@ufg.br(ORCID 0000-0001-7366-5650)- Productivity scholarship of CNPq
3
Agronomist, master’s degree student at Programa de Pós-graduação em Agronomia, Universidade Federal de Jataí, Jataí – GO, Brazil. E-mail:
angelitaragagnin@gmail.com (scholarship of CNPq)(ORCID 0000-0002-5115-2704)
4
Agronomist, master’s degree student at Programa de Pós-graduação em Agronomia, Universidade Federal de Jataí, Jataí – GO, Brazil. E-mail:
pedrrromagalhaes@gmail.com (scholarship of CAPES) (ORCID 0000-0002-4824-0738)
5
Agronomist, PhD in Agronomy, professor at Universidade Federal de Jataí, Academic department of agrarian sciences, Jataí – GO, Brazil.
E-mail: simerio_cruz@yahoo.com.br(ORCID 0000-0002-6327-8590)
1
2 F. R. Gomes et al.
After the evaluation of measurements and weight, results were given in cm² (Figure 1). Posteriorly, discs
the one hundred leaves were scanned individually at with 22.27 mm were detached from the base of each leaf.
resolution of 300 dpi and processed aiming determinate All discs were evaluated for the weight with the aid of a
leaf area with the aid of image analysis software, and these weighing machine and the results were expressed in grams.
Figure 1. Scanned leaf of A. humile for the processing in ImageJ (A and B), black and white leaf surface for contrast
(C), drawing of the leaf surface (D) and the leaf area in cm² (E).
Knowledge of leaf area is important, regardless with reduced leaf area and shady plants develop higher
of culture, because this characteristic represents the vegetative growth as a strategy to absorb more light
light interception by the photosynthetic apparatus and is energy.
widely used to determine vegetative growth (SANTOS et An efficient way to evaluate vegetative growth
al., 2014; FERREIRA et al., 2017). The maximum light is by the length and width variables. The use of linear
interception through the leaf area varies for each crop; leaf measurements allows the monitoring of leaf
however, a larger leaf area will cause greater shading of development in the field without the need to collect the
the lower plants and a lower photosynthetic rate of plants leaf, implying a simple and less costly procedure, and
(OLIVEIRA FILHO et al., 2018). these two characteristics are efficient in estimating leaf
The processing by softwares helps to obtain images area (OLIVEIRA et al., 2016). According to Sachet et al.
information for latter interpretations. Image analysis is (2015), the joint analysis of these two variables allows
efficient to determine shapes and sizes from the objects obtaining better coefficients of determination when
of interest and can be used in a quickly and simple way, compared with other methods.
discarding the need to use expensive devices (VIEIRA Several studies have been conducted regarding
JUNIOR et al., 2006; MATOS et al., 2019). According the influence of fresh weight on leaf area estimation,
to Shi et al. (2019), the leaf surface of a plant is the basis however, according to Cunha et al. (2010) few studies
of the potential yield of the crop and knowledge of the use the fresh leaf weight in the estimation, because it is
leaf area of the plant allows the estimation of water loss, not possible to establish a direct relationship between
since the leaves are the main organs that participate in the the weight and the leaf area. Estimation by fresh weight
transpiration process, responsible for gas exchange with of leaf discs may yield results with good accuracy in
the environment. some crops or low coefficient of determination and be
The width of the leaves the average was 60.31 mm inefficient for other crops, as it is variable according to
and for the length was 145.85 mm, regarding the leaf species, one should always compare with another method
weight, it was observed that they had an average weight and take consideration of the characteristics of the species
of 1.86 g and the leaf discs had a weight of approximately (LUCENA et al., 2011).
0.10 g (Table 1). Toebe et al. (2012), report that the leaf disc method
According to Faleiro and Saiki (2007), larger leaves was inadequate to determine the snap bean leaf area, as it
have high evapotranspiration, but with high photosynthetic was underestimated and the image analysis method was
efficiency. According to these authors, in regions like the efficient because it evaluates the leaf as a whole, regardless
Cerrado, there is a tendency for the leaves to be small, of the weight difference between the areas.
being considered an adaptive advantage of the species to By Pearson’s correlation coefficients between
avoid water loss through evapotranspiration the features of the leaves of A. humile, it is possible to
Similar behavior was observed by Moraes et al. observe that width, leaf area, length and leaf weight
(2013), in five native Cerrado species, where plants in presented significant correlation with each other (Table 2),
shaded environments presented greater length and width indicating that the leaf linear measurements are directly
than plants in environments with a high incidence of solar related to the leaf area, this behavior allows to evaluate
radiation, such effect can be explained by the fact that the vegetative growth, biomass accumulation and the final
plants in sunny locations have more active metabolism plant productivity (PEZZINI et al., 2018).
Table 2. Pearson’s correlation coefficients between features from one hundred leaves of A. humile
LA/¹ W L LW
W 0.88 **
L 0.73** 0.45**
LW 0.87** 0.73** 0.71**
DW 0.06 NS
-0.005 NS
0.04NS 0.25*
NS
Not significant; * Significant at 5% probability; ** Significant at 1% probability.
/¹ LA: Leaf Area, W: Width, L: Length, LW: Leaf weight, DW: Disc weight.
The leaf area of A. humile has a positive and Leaf length, width and weight are strongly
significant correlation with length and width (0.73 and correlated with leaf area. It is known that the leaf is
0.88), as well as length positively correlates with width the organ responsible for the production of lipids,
(0.45). It can be observed that the width has a negative and carbohydrates and proteins, being the knowledge of linear
non-significant correlation with the disc weight (-0.005), measurements and leaf area very important to understand
as well as the length and leaf area (0.04 and 0.06) and that the processes of plant development, photosynthetic
the leaf weight has a positive and significant correlation potential, nutritional and water requirement (ZEIST et
with the weight of the discs (0.25) (Table 2). al., 2014).
According to Kozak (2009), values below 0.2 are The simple linear regression model was the most
not significantly correlated, while values between 0.2 and accurate to explain the relationship of the leaf area
0.5 are poorly correlated, likewise values between 0.5 with width, length and leaf weight, and showed a high
and 0.7 or above 0.7 constitute a strong and very strong coefficient of determination (R²) for the relationships
correlation, with positive variables moving together and between leaf area x width, and leaf area x leaf weight
negative variables in opposite directions. In the present (Figure 2). The higher is the R² values and the lower is the
experiment, the leaf area showed a strong correlation with standard error of the estimate (SEE) values, the greater will
length and width, indicating that as one trait increases the be the accuracy of the model (MORGADO et al., 2013).
others increase. The prediction of models can be influenced by leaves
shape and their variations along the growth, which can
be decisive for the development of high precision models
(HARA et al., 2019).
Figure 2. Relationship between leaf area and width (A); leaf area and length (B); and leaf area and leaf weight (C) of
A. humile using linear regression models.
The relationship between the leaf area and the there was an increase in SEE and a reduction in R² (Table
length, width and leaf weight adjusted to linear statistical 3). The increase in R² values is related to the reduction
model. The relationship of the leaf area x leaf weight of the standard error of the estimate, which occurs due to
showed low SEE and high R², while to leaf area x width the increase in F-calc and to the reduction of sum of the
squares of the residues (FIALHO et al., 2011).
Table 3. Statistical models, regression parameters, Standard error of estimate (SEE), Determination coefficients adjusted
for degrees of freedom (R2), F-Calculated (F-calc) and leaf area estimate (LA) as a function of linear dimensions
(Width (W), Length (L)) and leaf weight (LW) of one hundred A. humile leaves
Model Parameters SEE R2 F-calc LA estimate
β0= -19.4152 *
LAw= β0+ β1X 4.6065 0.7872 367.22* LAw= -19.4152+ 1.4274W
β1= 1.4274*
β0= -30.8220*
LAl= β0+ β1X 9.1704 0.5300 116.15* LAl= -30.8220 + 0.6684L
β1= 0.6684*
β0= 16.8361*
LAlw= β0+ β1X 2.9884 0.7628 319.42* LAlw= 16.8361+ 26.7284LW
β1= 26.7284*
*
Significant at 5% level.
HARA, A.T.; GONÇALVES, A.C.A.; MALLER, A.; MUIANGA, C.A.; MUNIZ, J.A.; NASCIMENTO, M.S.;
HASHIGUTI, H.T.; OLIVEIRA, J.M.de. Ajuste de FERNANDES, T.J.; SAVIAN, T.V. Descrição da curva
modelo de predição de área foliar do feijoeiro em função de crescimento de frutos do cajueiro por modelos não
de medidas lineares. Revista Engenharia na Agricultura lineares. Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura, Jaboticabal,
- REVENG, Viçosa, v.27, n.2, p.179–186, 2019. v.38, n.1, p.22-32, 2016.
KOZAK, M. What is strong correlation?. Teaching OLIVEIRA FILHO, A.F.D.; SILVA, M.N.C.; INNECCO,
Statistics, Sheffield, v.31, n.3, p.85-86, 2009. R.; BEZERRA, F.T.C.; ABREU, W.E.D. Efeito do
arranjo de plantio da quinoa em baixa altitude. Revista
LEMOS, E.E.P.D.; SALVADOR, T.D.L.; SANTOS, de Ciências Agrárias, Lisboa v.41, n.2, p.81-90, 2018.
M.Q.C.D.; REZENDE, L.D.P.; SALVADOR, T.D.L.;
LIMA, H.M.A. Produção de porta-enxertos em tubetes OLIVEIRA, R.L.L.; MOREIRA, A.R.; COSTA, A.V.A.;
e enxertia precoce da pinheira (Annona squamosa L.). SOUZA, L.C.; LIMA, L.G.S.; SILVA, R.T.L. Modelos de
Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura, Jaboticabal, v.32, determinação não destrutiva de área foliar de feijão caupi
n.3, p.865-873, 2010. Vigna unguiculata (L.). Global Science and Technology,
Rio Verde, v.8, n.2, p.17-27, 2016.
LIMA, J.; MARTINS, M.; CARDOSO, J. Powdery
mildew damage to the production of BRS 189 cashew PADRÓN, R.A.R.; LOPES, S.J.; SWAROWSKY, A.;
plants. Revista Ceres, Viçosa, v.66, n.3, p.1-14, 2019. CERQUERA, R.R.; NOGUEIRA, C.U.; MAFFEI, M.
Non-destructive models to estimate leaf área on Bell
LIMA, M.C.D.; PORTARI, G.V. Centesimal composition pepper crop. Ciência Rural, Santa Maria, v.46, n.11,
and antioxidant compounds of two fruits from the Cerrado p.1983-1944, 2016.
(Brazilian Savannah). Revista Ceres, Viçosa, MG, v.66,
n.1, p.41-44, 2019. PEREIRA, L.D.; SILVA, D.F.; REIS, E.F.; PINTO, J.F.;
ASSUNÇÃO, H.F.; MACHADO, C.G.; GOMES, F.R.;
LORENZI, H.; BACHER, L.; LACERDA, M.; SARTORI, CARNEIRO, L.C.; CRUZ, S.C.S.; COSTA, C.H.M.
S. Frutas brasileiras e exóticas cultivadas: de consumo Characterization of Bushy Cashew (Anacardium humile
in natura. São Paulo: Instituto Plantarum de Estudos da A.St.-Hil.) in the State of Goiás, Brazil. Journal of
Flora, 2006. 672 p. Agricultural Science, Ontario, v.11, n.5, p.183-194, 2019.
MATOS, T.J.R.; RAMOS, G.Q.; MATOS, R.S.; REIS, A.F.; SCHMIELE, M. Características e
FONSECA FILHO, H.D. Medição da área foliar de potencialidades dos frutos do Cerrado na indústria de
Anacardium Occidentale L. baseada em processamento alimentos. Brazilian Journal of Food Technology,
digital de imagens. Scientia Amazonia, Manaus, v.8, n.1, Campinas, v.22, p.1-12. 2019.
p.11-15, 2019.
RESSEL, K.A.; RIBEIRO, M.S.L.; REIS, E.F.
MORAES, L.; SANTOS, R.K.; WISSER, T.Z.; KRUPEK, Desempenho de progênies de diferentes matrizes de
R.A. Avaliação da área foliar a partir de medidas lineares cajuzinho-do-cerrado mediante o armazenamento e o
simples de cinco espécies vegetais sob diferentes peso das núculas. Ciência Rural, Santa Maria, v.45, n.10,
condições de luminosidade. Revista Brasileira de p.1782-1787, 2015.
Biociências, Porto Alegre, v.11, n.4, p.381-387, 2013.
RIBEIRO, J.E.S.; BARBOSA, A.J.S.; ALBUQUERQUE,
MORGADO, M.A.D.; BRUCKNER, C.H.; ROSADO, M.B. Leaf area estimate of Erythroxylum simonis
L.D.S.; ASSUNÇÃO, W.; SANTOS, C.E.M. dos. Plowman by linear dimensions. Floresta e Ambiente,
Estimação da área foliar por método não destrutivo, Rio de Janeiro, v.25, n.2, p.e20170108, 2018.
utilizando medidas lineares das folhas de espécies de
Passiflora. Revista Ceres, Viçosa, MG, v.60, n.5, p.662-
667, 2013.
SACHET, M.R.; PENSO, G.A.; PERTILLE, R.H.; SHI, P.; LIU, M.; YU, X.; GIELIS, J.; RATKOWSKY,
GUERREZI, M.T.; CITADIN, I. Estimativa da área foliar D.A. Proportional relationship between leaf area and the
de pessegueiro por método não-destrutivo. Ciência Rural, product of leaf length and width of four types of special
Santa Maria, v.45, n.12, p.2161-2163, 2015. leaf shapes. Forests, Basel, v.10, n.2, p.178, 2019.
SANTOS, S.N.; DIGAN, R.C.; AGUILAR, M.A.G.; TOEBE, M.; CARGNELUTTI FILHO, A.; LOOSE, L.H.;
SOUZA, C.A.S.; PINTO, D.G.; MARINATO, C.S.; HELDWEIN, A.B.; ZANON, A.J. Leaf area of snap bean
ARPINI, T.S. Análise comparativa de métodos de (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) according to leaf dimensions.
determinação de área foliar em genótipos de cacau. Semina: Ciências Agrárias, Londrina, v.33, n.1, p.2491-
Bioscience Journal, Uberlândia, v.30, n.3, 2014. 2500, 2012.
Supplemento
TOEBE, M.; SOUZA, R.R.; MELLO, A.C.; MELO, P.J.;
SANTOS, R. da C. dos; SANTOS JÚNIOR J.E. dos. SEGATTO, A.; CASTANHA, A.C. Leaf area estimation
Divergência genética por análise multivariada de of squash ‘Brasileirinha’ by leaf dimensions. Ciência
caracteres fenotípicos de Anacardium Humile (St.Hilaire). Rural, Santa Maria, v.49, n.4, p.1-11, 2019. VIEIRA
Revista Ceres, Viçosa, MG, v.62, n.6, p.553–560, 2015. JUNIOR, P.A.; NETO, D.D.; CICERO, S.M.; JORGE,
L.A.D.C.; MANFRON, P.A.; MARTIN, T.N. Estimativa
SANTOS, S.C.; CARVALHO, R.DOS S.; DAVIDE, da área foliar em milho através de análise de imagens.
L.M.C. Genetic Polymorphism among Natural Populations Revista Brasileira de Milho e Sorgo, Sete Lagoas, v.5,
of Anacardium Humile A.ST-HIL. Revista Brasileira de n.1, p.58–66, 2006.
Fruticultura, Jaboticabal, v.42, n.1, 2020.
ZEIST, A.R.; OLIVEIRA, J.R.F.; LIMA FILHO, R.B.;
SILVA, S.F.; CABANEZ, P.A.; MENDONÇA, R.F.; SILVA, M.L.S.; RESENDE, J.T.V. Comparação de
PEREIRA, L.R.; AMARAL, J.A.T. Modelos alométricos métodos de estimativa de área foliar em morangueiro.
para estimativa da área foliar de mangueira pelo método Pesquisa Agropecuária Gaúcha, Porto Alegre, v.20,
não destrutivo. Revista Agro@ambiente On-line, p.33-41, 2014.
Roraima, v.9, n.1, p.86-90, 2015.