The Court held that a holder of non-cumulative preferred shares was not entitled to dividends for years where the company suffered losses and did not declare dividends, even after the company's financial position improved. While some courts had found preferred shareholders entitled to dividends in arrears under certain circumstances, the Supreme Court limited this doctrine to cases involving fraud or bad faith. Here, the company's accumulation of reserves after losses in accordance with sound business policy was permissible and not grounds for the preferred shareholder's claim to dividends in prior loss years.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
57 views2 pages
119 Lich v. US Rubber
The Court held that a holder of non-cumulative preferred shares was not entitled to dividends for years where the company suffered losses and did not declare dividends, even after the company's financial position improved. While some courts had found preferred shareholders entitled to dividends in arrears under certain circumstances, the Supreme Court limited this doctrine to cases involving fraud or bad faith. Here, the company's accumulation of reserves after losses in accordance with sound business policy was permissible and not grounds for the preferred shareholder's claim to dividends in prior loss years.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2
Lich v. United States Rubber Co.
part, by the cutting down of dividends which
39 F. Supp. 675/ 1941 / Smith, J/CORPO -DIVIDENDS would otherwise have been paid to preferred stockholders, that fund, so far as it SUMMARY. After the 3 fiscal years that the company suffered represents moneys so retained, is available losses, it reconstructed its capital structures and declared for the payment of subsequent dividends dividends for the preferred stocks for 3 fiscal years after the upon the preferred stock” restructuring. Lich, holder of non-cumulative preferred shares, o The rule there was to prevent the board to claims dividends for years that they were not declared because defraud the preferred stockholders by not the company suffered losses. Lich made this demand in the declaring dividends when they are due. year that the company declared dividend for both preferred and US Supreme Court: common stock. The Court held for the company and stated The doctrine in Cast Iron Pipes is limited to the that since the accumulation of reserves were in accordance circumstance of the case (the court said that the with sound business policy and not shown to be tainted with doctrine in Cast Iron Pipes departs from the general bad faith, the right to maintain reserve is not open to challenge. rule that the holders of non-cumulative preferred stock DOCTRINE. Dividends on non-cumulative preferred stock are lose with the close of the fiscal year all rights in the payable only out of net profits and for the years in which said undistributed net profits of the year net profits are actually earned. It applied instead, the Day case where it limited the application of the doctrine in Cast Iron Pipes The right to dividends is conditional upon: (1) accrual of net o Test of applicability: WON there were, in profits, and (2) retention in the business. the years in which dividends were not declared, net profits available for the lawful If the annual net earnings of a corp. are justifiably applied to declaration and payment of dividends, but legitimate corp. purposes, such as payment of debts. If they withheld from the non-cumulative preferred are applied against prior losses and thereby completely stockholder and retained in the business. absorbed, there are no net profits from which dividends may be o What are "net profits" within the meaning of lawfully paid.. the statute? The statute is devoid of any definitive answer. The term, however, is one FACTS. of common usage and the ordinary United States Rubber Co. was organized under the laws of acceptation must be adopted. The term the State of New Jersey, incorporated in 1892. connotes the clear pecuniary gain remaining after deducting from the gross earnings of Lich is a holder of 300 shares of non-cumulative preferred the business the expenses incurred in its stock during the years in question of US Rubber. conduct, the losses sustained in its In fiscal years 1935, 1936, 1937: annual net earnings of prosecution, and the capital invested. Where $2,231,377.69, $10,172,484.46, $8,607,902.92 but it capital is impaired, annual net earnings, if suffered deficits of $25,870,402.67, $17,204,158.52, insufficient to offset the impairment, do not $10,471,626.89 respectively. constitute net profits. The deficit representing accrued losses of prior years o Rule Laid Down in Day Case: existed in 1934 and was carried over into the succeeding years, impairing the capital. Cumulative Preferred Stock Non-Cumulative Preferred No dividends were declared for the 3 years for both Stock common and preferred shares. Despite the deficit, the Have priority in payment for Priority in payment is limited company maintained adequate reserves. all years past and present, to the unpaid dividends for 1938: as per statute, reconstructed its capital structure. It until paid, whether the net those years when such net issued $10 par value common stock. This resulted in a earnings for any particular earnings were sufficient to capital surplus which was applied to the deficit. past or present year were or pay such dividends 1938, 1939, 1940:te company gained net profits and it were not sufficient to pay the declared dividends declared for PS but none for CS. stipulated cumulative March 5, 1941: declared dividend for both common and dividends preferred stock. This contemplates payment only for the o Reason for this rule: to prevent the payment current year. This declaration did not affect the reserves, of a dividend on the common stock in keeping it intact. violation of the priority rights of the preferred Lich alleges that preference as to dividends extends not stockholders. only to current year but to prior years of 1935-37 Lich was o In the absence of fraud, therefore, two arguing that dividends may not be paid on common stock things are essential to accomplish this, until dividends are paid on the preferred ones for the years namely: First, affirmative action of some the company did not declare dividends (1935-37) kind by the board of directors establishing ISSUES & RATIO. the fact of earnings for the previous years, 1. WON the preferred shareholders are entitled to now available for the payment of the withheld dividends during 1935-37? NO or `passed' dividends for those years upon the preferred stock; and, second, affirmative No dividend is earned in any year unless the action of the board of directors declaring a operations for that year produce a fund. Lich used the dividend upon the common stock in violation ruling in Bassett v. United States Cast Iron Pipe & of the priority rights thus established of the Foundry Co: preferred stockholders. o “the right to earned dividends is not o (the court noted that this distinction extinguished upon the mere passing of the preserves the difference between cumulative fiscal year. “On the other hand, when the and non-cumulative preferred shares) reserve fund is accumulated, in whole or in The Law itself sets limits in declaring dividends: "The directors of a corporation shall not pay dividends except from its surplus * * * or from the net profits arising from the business of the corporation, nor shall they divide, withdraw, or in any way pay to the stockholders or any of them, any part of the capital stock of the corporation or reduce its capital stock except as authorized by law." (N.J.S.A. 14:8-19) The corporation is charged with the duty of maintaining the integrity of the capital, on the faith of which credit was extended, as a "trust fund" for the security of the creditors as well as for the benefit of the corporation. In this Case: From 1935-37, there were no net profits to which the inchoate right to dividends, could have attached. No dividends out of net profits are earned until there is a balance of assets over liabilities, arising from the business of the corporation. Dividends on non-cumulative preferred stock are payable only out of net profits and for the years in which said net profits are actually earned. The right to dividends is conditional upon: (1) accrual of net profits, and (2) retention in the business. The corporation maintained in the years in question adequate reserves for insurance, pensions, and contingencies. It does not appear, however, that the sum retained in this account was disproportionate or that it represented profits withheld from the non- cumulative preferred stockholders, as was the fact in the Cast Iron Pipe cases. It appears in the immediate case that the reserves are, and have been, maintained in accordance with the sound business policy. The directors are charged with the management of the corporate business, and, in the absence of fraud or bad faith, their authority must be regarded as absolute. Questions of management and policy must be left to their honest judgment and discretion. The right to maintain reserve is not open to challenge.
DECISION. Judgment in favor of the defendant and against the plaintiff is entered.