Legal Liability For Supervisors (Mhs Act) : Learner Guide
Legal Liability For Supervisors (Mhs Act) : Learner Guide
16/MQA/0400/AC4/29-513
LEARNER GUIDE
S A F E T Y A N D T R A I N IPage
N G 2S of
O L107
UTIONS
Published by
Safety and Training Solutions (Pty) Ltd
PO Box 219, Menlyn, Pretoria, 0063
Worldwide publishing and distribution rights held by Safety And Training Solutions (Pty) Ltd, PO Box
219, Menlyn, Pretoria, 0063. No part of this document may be reproduced by any means, nor
transmitted, nor translated into a machine language without prior written permission of the publisher.
The information contained in this reference material is distributed as a guide only; it has been compiled
from sources believed to be reliable and to represent the best current opinion on the subject. No
warranty, guarantee or representation is made by Safety And Training Solutions as to the absolute
correctness or sufficiency of any representation contained in this reference material, and Safety And
Training Solutions assumes no responsibility in connection therewith; nor can it be assumed that all
acceptable risk control measures are included herein, or that other measures may not be required in
particular or exceptional conditions or circumstances.
While Safety and Training Solutions does not undertake to provide a revision service or guarantee
accuracy, we shall be pleased to respond to your individual requests for information at any time.
S A F E T Y A N D T R A I N IPage
N G 3S of
O L107
UTIONS
INDEX Page
1. : Learning Outcomes 4
2. : Introduction to the Mine Health and Safety Act 5
3. : Definitions 10
4. : Nature and content of the Mine Health and Safety Act 12
5. : Index to the Regulations 14
6. : Objective of the MHS Act 18
7. : General duties of the Employer 18
8. : Duties and Right of the Employee 21
9. : Appointments and Competencies 25
10. : Trackless Mobile Machines 40
11 : Requirements when Flammable Gas is detected 47
12 : Requirements of Flexible Trailing cables 48
13 : Requirements regarding Dust control 48
14 : Requirements regarding the supply of water 49
15. : Health and Safety Representatives 49
16. : Risk Assessments 52
17. : Incident Reporting 54
18. : Incident Investigation 58
19. : Planned Task Observations 59
20. : Education and Training 60
21. : Occupational Hygiene 61
22. : Occupational Health 61
23. : Manufacturers Liability 65
24. : Hazardous Substances 66
25. : Introduction to the Regulations 69
26. : Statutory Compliance: Criminal and Civil Liability 72
27 : Codes of Practice 79
28. : Personal Protective Equipment – Legal Reference 84
29. : Contractors – The Legal Positions 85
30. : Powers and functions of the Inspectorate 90
31. : Offences and Penalties 100
S A F E T Y A N D T R A I N IPage
N G 4S of
O L107
UTIONS
LEARNING OUTCOMES
• Understand his/her roles and responsibilities with regard to compliance with the MHS Act
THE STATUTES
Reference will also be made to other legislation that could have an impact on the dominant theme of
this course, namely Health and safety in the mining industry, the most notable legislation would be the
Occupational Health and Safety Act 85 of 1993 and Regulations and the Labour Relations Act 66
of 1995.
S A F E T Y A N D T R A I N IPage
N G 5S of
O L107
UTIONS
The Mine Health and Safety Act 29 of 1996 (MHSA) is a very complex statute regulating health and safety
at the workplaces. It thus reflects the standards society expects when it comes to workplace health and
safety.
It is commonly accepted that there will always be some form of ‘risk’ exposure at the workplace, and the
Act accordingly recognizes this. It however expects every person at a workplace to do all that they can to
minimize the chance of an accident or incident at the workplace. In short, it expects every person to act
like a reasonable person when it comes to the maintenance of health and safety at their workplace.
Health and Safety at a workplace is a team effort involving everyone from top level management to the
lower rank employees. Experience has shown that many employees still believe that health and safety is
only the problem of senior management. The legal view is that this is not what one would expect of a
reasonable employee, and any employee holding such a belief risks being penalised in terms of the Act.
S A F E T Y A N D T R A I N IPage
N G 6S of
O L107
UTIONS
The following statement made by the Judge in [Barker v Union Government] may serve as an indication
of the possible consequences if there were no act:
“Absolute safety under all circumstances is not guaranteed to the labourer by the contract of employment.
The employer is not an insurer. He is not bound to furnish the safest machinery, or to provide the best
possible means for its operation, in order to relieve him from responsibility.”
The employment contract of the employee itself would not provide him/her with much recourse against
his/her employer for an injury sustained at work. He/she could consider bringing a civil claim for the
injuries against his employer but to do so he would have to prove, on a balance of probabilities that his
employer’s negligence resulted in his injuries.
This situation could cause many employees to not bother because the employee pursuing a civil remedy
could possibly be exposed to victimization, or the threat of losing his job.
Such a scenario would not necessarily motivate the employer to take all reasonable steps to safeguard
the health and safety of his employees. Thus the need for legislation that makes an irresponsible attitude
towards workplace health and safety a criminal offence.
The statutory regulation of health and safety in the mining industry can be traced back to the Mines and
Works Act 27 of 1956. The Mines and Works Act consisted of the Act and several regulations. The Act
itself consisted of only 21 sections. The regulations were made to regulate specific problems and
situations that occurred in the mining industry, most issues were addressed in these regulations.
The Mines and Works Act, No 27 of 1956 got repealed by the Minerals Act on 1 January 1992 with the
exception of Section 9, which was a restriction on Sunday work and other relevant definitions. The
Minerals Act did however not repeal all the regulations made in terms of the Mines and Works Act, most of
the well known regulations is still in place.
S A F E T Y A N D T R A I N IPage
N G 7S of
O L107
UTIONS
1. Individual liability
The concept of individual liability for workplace incidents were created by the Mines and Works Act.
The owner of the Mine or Works could now do an appointment in writing for a manager in terms of
Regulation 2.5.1 because provision was made for this. Regulation 2.5.1 stated that each mine and
works should be under a manager who would be responsible for the control, management and
direction of the mine or works. Insofar as responsibility for health and safety was concerned, the
manager had the following functions:
• He had to take all reasonable measures to comply with and enforce the requirements of the
Minerals Act as well as with the orders given by inspectors in the interests of health and safety and
to ensure that employees observe them.
• He had to take all reasonable measures to provide for the safety and proper discipline of the
employees.
• He had to prevent the employment of incompetent workmen for dangerous work. (This provision is
however still in force under the Minerals Act).
The Minerals Act had in essence retained the most important and sufficient of the above, although the
duties and responsibilities of the mine manager, which was now provided for, in terms of section 31 of
the Act itself, were more strongly formulated. Section 31 forms part of the now repealed Chapter 5 of
the Minerals Act.
The Mines and Works Act also provided for the appointment of subordinate managers in terms of
Regulation 2.6.1. The Minerals Act retains this provision. A subordinate manager is appointed to
assist the manager in the control, management and direction of a mine or works and has the same
responsibilities as the manager, but for a reduced area of responsibility.
The manager's responsibilities were redefined with the enactment of the Minerals Act, as were the
responsibilities of a subordinate manager. This was done to demonstrate that more was expected from
management with regard to occupational health and safety.
Notwithstanding the above, the Engineer in charge was effectively the person held responsible for what
occurred at a workplace. The reasoning behind this is that by virtue of his background, he is the most
competent person to explain, for example why a particular installation has failed.
The problem therefore was that the manager still controlled the provision of health and safety resources,
and because the inspectors did not really hold him accountable, he was, invariably, not inspired to be
generous in the provision of such resources. The reformulation of the Manager’s duties and
responsibilities, as mentioned above, was intended to address this issue.
S A F E T Y A N D T R A I N IPage
N G 8S of
O L107
UTIONS
2. Administration
The Government Mining Engineer Deputy and Assistant Government Mining Engineer, inspectors of
mines and inspectors of machinery supervised the Mines and Works Act. The inspectors were the officials
that practically administered and policed the Act at the workplace.
They had wide ranging powers and even had jurisdiction, under certain circumstances, to convict and
sentence contraveners of regulations and/or special rules. The inspector could, however, impose a fine
only and not a jail sentence. The employer had the right to withhold payment of wages from a
contravener who failed to pay his fine, and to pay the amount over to the inspector. There was a special
provision requiring an inspector to pay all fines received over to the State Revenue Fund.
The Minerals Act was, in turn, administered by the Director-General of the Department of Mineral and
Energy Affairs. The application of the Act's provisions was done under the direction of and was subject to
the instructions of a deputy director (generally known as the Government Mining Engineer).
Regional Directors were appointed on a regional basis and were to a great extent autonomous in their
regions. They had a multitude of functions and were assisted by a Regional Mining Engineer and other
officers.
The Mines and Works Act made a person guilty of an offence if he, by his act or his omission, caused
serious bodily injury to any other person. The maximum fine was R 1 000 and only if he failed to pay
this fine, could he be sentenced to jail for a period not exceeding twenty four months i.e. a jail
sentence was not really a threat as long as he had enough funds to pay the R 1000 fine.
The Minerals Act had a similar provision although it added the requirement of negligence. The fine was
R 15000 initially, but the Minerals Amendment Act did away with these limits. What is important though,
is that the Minerals Act provided that a jail sentence of 2 years could be imposed without the option of first
paying a fine.
Health and safety forms an integral part of most of the provisions of the Act, although health and safety is
now addressed primarily by the Mine Health and Safety Act. For example, the chapter on authorization to
prospect and to mine may, when first considered, have very little to do with health and safety, but it plays
an important role in the assessment of the boundaries of a mining area i.e. to ascertain which health and
safety legislation is applicable.
S A F E T Y A N D T R A I N IPage
N G 9S of
O L107
UTIONS
The Minerals Act is now intended to regulate the issues of mining which do not necessarily deal with
health and safety, as is summed up in the revised objective:
“...To regulate the prospecting for, and the optimal exploitation, processing and
utilization of minerals;
... To regulate the orderly utilization and the rehabilitation of the surface of land during
and after prospecting and mining operations; and
Chapter 1: Definitions:
Sections 2 to 4 provide for the division of the republic into regions for administration purposes, as well as
the appointment of Directors: Mineral Development (previously regional directors).
Sections 5 to 16 regulate the right to prospect and to mine, the issuing of prospecting permits, the issuing
of mining authorization, etc. An in-depth knowledge of these provisions is not needed.
Sections 17 to 25. These provisions have very little to do with health and safety as this chapter has, as its
primary aim the protection and optimal use of our natural resources.
Sections 26 to 37. This chapter was previously of prime importance for the purposes of health and safety.
This chapter was, however, repealed by the promulgation of the Mine Health and Safety Act, which not
only addresses health and safety issues previously included in this chapter, but also additional health and
safety requirements.
Sections 38 to 42. This chapter was extensively revised by the Minerals Amendment Act, 1993. Issues
addressed include rehabilitation, environmental management, and the removal of buildings.
S A F E T Y A N D T R A I NPage
I N G 10
SOofL107
UTIONS
Chapter 7: Transitional Provisions
Sections 43 to 50. The issues dealt with include the continuation of prospecting rights, the deproclamation
of land, the continuation of mining rights, etc. The right to certain diamonds is vested in the state.
S A F E T Y A N D T R A I NPage
I N G 11
SOofL107
UTIONS
Chapter 5 of the Minerals Act previously regulated health and safety at a mine. It was however felt that
Chapter 5 did not deal with this issue sufficiently enough. Certainly, the frequency and seriousness of
mining disasters seemed to support this view. In particular, the Merriespruit disaster of 1994, in which the
wall of a slimes dam collapsed, moved the Government to appoint a commission of inquiry into health and
safety in the mining industry. This commission was under the chairmanship of Mr. Justice R.N. Leon.
The commission's mandate was to investigate all aspects of the legal regulation of health and safety in the
mining industry as defined in the Minerals Act No 50 of 1991, and it subsequently made recommendations
to the State President on possible improvements to existing regulatory legislation and the implementation
of these changes, in the light of prevailing circumstances within the mining industry.
The recommendations of the commission not only related to amendments to be made in the Minerals Act
50 of 1991, but also to the drafting of a new Act. The recommendations were as follows:
1. A new Act, devoted to health and safety in the mining industry only, should be drafted.
2. The existing regulations under the supervision of the Mining Regulation Advisory Committee (MRAC)
should be upgraded.
• Occupational Health.
4 Regulations dealing with occupational health in mines should be promulgated as soon as possible.
These regulations require, inter alia, that
• the mine owners provide medical surveillance for the diseases on the mine; and
• the mine manager ensures that the owner's surveillance scheme is properly operated, and that
adequate records are kept, and supplied (subject to medical ethics).
S A F E T Y A N D T R A I NPage
I N G 12
SOofL107
UTIONS
5 A Mine Health and Safety Council must be established to advise the Minister on all matters relating to
health and safety in mines, the relevant legislation and the enforcement thereof.
6 The owner must appoint those persons slotting in between the manager and the owner in the hierarchy,
e.g. consulting engineers.
7 A system of health and safety representatives should be established at each mine, with at least one
representative per 100 non-managerial employees. The manager, in consultation with the workforce
should facilitate their election, and define the workplaces to be covered.
8 One or more Mine Health and Safety Committee(s) should be established by the manager at each
mine, after consultation with workplace representatives.
9 The mining industry should develop a methodology for assessing the most serious hazards at the
workplace.
During 1995 the Parliamentary Mineral and Energy Affairs Portfolio Committee supported the
recommendation for the drafting of a new Act and shortly thereafter the Cabinet approved the
implementation of this recommendation.
The Mine Health and Safety Bill was subsequently drafted by MRAC. MRAC is a tripartite body
comprising of members of the state, employers and employees that was established on a voluntary
basis. The main objects of the Bill were to promote and protect the health and safety of all persons
employed or working at mines.
• To provide for appropriate systems of employee, employer, and State participation in health and
safety matters;
• To establish representative tripartite institutions to review legislation, promote health and enhance
properly targeted research;
• To provide for effective monitoring systems and inspections, investigations and inquiries to improve
health and safety;
S A F E T Y A N D T R A I NPage
I N G 13
SOofL107
UTIONS
• To regulate employers’ and employees’ duties to identify hazards and eliminate, control and
minimize the risk to health and safety;
• To give effect to the public international law obligations of the Republic relating to minimizing health
and safety.
The most important feature of the Act is the style of drafting. The traditional method of drafting long hard-
to-understand paragraphs has been replaced by more reader friendly language.
This Act is dedicated solely to health and safety within the mining industry, which was not the case with the
amended Minerals Act. The promulgation of the Mine Health and Safety Act did not have the effect of
repealing the Minerals Act. It did however repeal the chapter devoted to Health and Safety in the Minerals
Act (Chapter 5), thereby creating a "New Minerals Act", dealing only with the prospecting of minerals, their
utilization and processing, rehabilitation of land and matters connected therewith. The Mine Health and
Safety Act consist of 106 sections, which are divided into 8 chapters.
S A F E T Y A N D T R A I NPage
I N G 14
SOofL107
UTIONS
The Mine Health and Safety Regulations were originally mostly derived from the Minerals Act 50 of 1991.
Regulations of the Minerals Act that deals with health and safety matters are continuously being repealed
and incorporated into the Mine Health and Safety Act. In addition, a number of new regulations, unique to
the MHS Act, have been promulgated in the last few years and will continue to be promulgated from time to
time.
The result of this state of affairs is that it is now crucial that management always keeps up to date with
what is published in the Government gazette.
S A F E T Y A N D T R A I NPage
I N G 15
SOofL107
UTIONS
It implements and administers the legislation. It appoints the Inspectorate which has the role of
“policeman” i.e. checking compliance with the Acts.
They are responsible for carrying out compliance with the legislation.
Chapter 4 of the Mine Health and Safety Act provides for the establishment of an advisory council
consisting out of:
These 15 members represent management, workers and the state. The Mine Health and Safety
Council advises the Minister on health and safety matters. It consists of three permanent committees:
Sections 45 and 46 of the Mine Health and Safety Act provide for the establishment of the Mining
Qualifications Authority. Like the abovementioned Council, it consists of 15 members from
management, workers and the state. This council’s functions are mainly as follows:
• They seek registration as a body responsible for generating education and training standards and
qualifications;
• They seek accreditation as a body responsible for monitoring and auditing achievements;
• They propose education and training standards and qualifications to bodies;
• They generate education and training standards and qualifications;
• They also monitor and audit achievements in terms of the standards and qualifications;
• and they perform the function of a sector education and training authority.
S A F E T Y A N D T R A I NPage
I N G 16
SOofL107
UTIONS
The Occupational Health and Safety Act (OHSA) apply as a general rule, except in respect of:
“Mine” (verb)
• making excavations or boreholes, or exploitation of any mineral in any other way for the purpose of
winning a mineral
• prospecting in connection with winning a mineral (i.e. looking beyond the area where a mineral is
being won )
“Prospecting”
• intentionally searching for any mineral (this involves disturbing the earth by excavations or drilling)
“Mine” (noun)
• excavation in the earth (this includes earth under the sea or other water)
• boreholes ( except boreholes drilled for water )
• any other area where a mineral is being exploited
• includes all structures, machinery and roads found in such an area of excavation, and used for the
purpose of extracting minerals
“Mining area”
• includes the area adjacent to the mine
• also includes non-adjacent areas, provided that
- they are connected to the mine by means of a road, railway, conveyor belt etc. which is owned
by the mine, and is continuous;
- they are under the control of the person/body who has authorization to mine;
- they are used in connection with the mining operation.
S A F E T Y A N D T R A I NPage
I N G 17
SOofL107
UTIONS
“Works”
Any place, excluding a mine, where the following will be carried out:
• training and central rescue station
• the transmission and distribution of power to a consumer
• any operation connected to the above
These definitions are not comprehensive, and the Minerals Act and Mine Health and Safety Acts should
be consulted. The important thing is to know whether an operation can fall into any of these definitions.
Examples of where OHSA would apply include:
(Provided that these areas are not used in direct connection with mining activities).
Section 103 - The Occupational Health and Safety Act, 1993 (Act No. 85 of 1993), is not
applicable to any matter in respect of which any provision of this Act is applicable.
Note, however, that in terms of Section 80 (1) the Minister may declare any provision of this Act to be
applicable to the mines. Furthermore, the Act has certain regulations that could be used as precedents,
e.g.
S A F E T Y A N D T R A I NPage
I N G 18
SOofL107
UTIONS
CHAPTER 2
Section 2 - Employer to ensure safety
1)(a) The employer must ensure that as far as is reasonably practicable, that the mine is
designed, constructed and equipped
• to provide a healthy and safe working environment, and
• with a system of communication, and mechanical/electrical equipment that will achieve
this purpose.
(b) The employer must ensure that as far as is reasonably practicable, the mine is
operated (from commissioning to decommissioning) in a way that employees can
work without danger to their health and safety and that of others.
(i) The employer must compile an annual health and safety, and medical report.
(ii) The employer must compile an annual report to shareholders, incorporating the
abovementioned reports.
2) The employer of a mine that is not being worked, but in respect of which a closure
certificate has not been issued, must take reasonable steps to continuously prevent
injuries, ill-health, and loss of life or damage of any kind from occurring at or because
of the mine.
S A F E T Y A N D T R A I NPage
I N G 19
SOofL107
UTIONS
The Mine Health and Safety Act defines “Chief Executive Officer” as:
the person who is responsible for the overall management and control of the business of
the employer
The Mine Health and Safety Act defines “owner” as (in relation to a mine):
• the holder of a prospecting permit or mining authorization issued under the Minerals Act,
if a permit or authorization does not exist, the person for whom the activities of a mine are
undertaken, but excludes an independent contractor
• if neither of the above, the last person who worked that mine or that person’s successor
in title
Sections 2 (1) and (2) would be regarded as the duties of the employer, summarized in a few paragraphs.
These paragraphs represent what the employer would be undertaking, as his active contribution towards
maintaining health and safety.
Section 2 (1) (a) (ii) requires an effective communication system i.e. it is not merely a practical
requirement, but has legal prescription. In this regard, it is essential that the employer maintain structured
liaison with the mines - and that this liaison be documented (as proof of compliance). Flow diagrams tend
to be a useful aid.
Sections 2 (1) (c) and (d) require the employer to compile an annual medical report. No guidelines have
ever been issued by the Medical Inspector as to the format, or even what content these reports should
have. The ultimate aim of these reports is to assist the Mine Health and Safety Council (notably MOHAC)
in compiling a general dossier of the state of health in the mining industry.
Section 2 (a) (2) highlights the fact that statutory liability for a mine, in terms of the mining legislation, only
ceases where the closure of the mine has been formalized by the issue of a closure certificate. Thus,
where a mine ceases to operate, and the cessation is intended to be permanent, it would be expedient to
arrange the closure certificate as soon as possible thereafter.
S A F E T Y A N D T R A I NPage
I N G 20
SOofL107
UTIONS
• identify the hazards and assess the risks to persons other than employees, and
• ensure that persons other than employees who may be directly affected by the
activities of the mine are not exposed to health and safety risks.
Although Section 5 refers to “employer”, the general duties are equally applicable to all persons who
help him run a mine - including the employer. After all, the general duties would be too much for one
person to cope with.
Section 5 could be seen as the overall requirements of the Mine Health and Safety Act summarized in
a few sentences. Section 5 must be cross-read with the objectives of Section 1, especially:
The employer must note the value of indemnities that visitors are required to sign. The employer will be
responsible for their health and safety while they are present on the site. If negligence can be proved by
the visitor, an indemnity will not protect the employer against a civil action.
What is regarded as healthy and safe is not left completely to the discretion of the employer and the Mine
Health and Safety Act requires him/it to co-operate with, and give feedback to, the Mine Health and Safety
Council and Inspectorate.
Note Section 5 (2) widens the statutory duty of ensuring health and safety to include persons other than
employees, e.g. the residents, visitors and even trespassers on the mines. This means risk assessment
exercises must include a focus on visitors and the community at large, e.g. slime dams and nearby
villages.
S A F E T Y A N D T R A I NPage
I N G 21
SOofL107
UTIONS
These are set out in Section 22 & 23 of the Act and are as follows:
DUTIES:
Examples include:
b) Take reasonable care to protect the health and safety of other persons who may be
affected by any act or omission of that employee.
Examples include:
c) Use, and take proper care of the protective clothing, equipment and facilities provided
for their health and safety.
Examples include:
• properly using a lockout procedure
• not using safety shoes as soccer boots on weekends
• not vandalizing machine guards or symbolic signs
Note: The instruction given to an employee must be reasonable, and have the purpose of
ensuring health and safety. Ordering the employee to do something dangerous would be
unreasonable, and also unlawful in terms of MHSA. (Refer to Section 83(1))
S A F E T Y A N D T R A I NPage
I N G 22
SOofL107
UTIONS
d) Immediately report any situation which they believe to be a health and safety risk to
their immediate supervisor, and which they cannot sort out themselves.
e) Co-operate with any person to help him comply with his duties and responsibilities in
terms of the Act.
Examples include:
Examples include:
Notwithstanding the fact that employees are to comply with the stated duties, no employee can comply
with these duties if he is unaware thereof. This situation immediately places the onus on the employer
and supervisor to ensure that all employees are instructed and trained in these duties prior to
being permitted to perform work at the mine. The supervisor, for his part, would have to continuously
check that the employees understand and remember their duties.
S A F E T Y A N D T R A I NPage
I N G 23
SOofL107
UTIONS
EMPLOYEES RIGHTS:
1) The employee has the right to leave any the workplace whenever -
• he believes, with reasonable justification, that there is a danger to health and safety,
and/or
• the Health and Safety Representative orders him to do so.
2) The Employer must in consultation with the Health and Safety Committee draft a
procedure dealing with the following:
• The notification to supervisors and Health and Safety Representatives of the danger
• Employee participation in resolving the workplace danger
• Inspector participation
• Alternative work for the employee
• Warnings to other employees who work in the same workplace
Regulation 8.3.2 of the Minerals Act Regulations has always had such a provision. This regulation,
however, did not provide the employee with the right to leave the workplace, but placed the
responsibility on the employee to report the dangerous situation to his immediate supervisor.
This Regulation, clearly, did not provide the employee with the right to make his own decision as to the
safety of the workplace.
Although the legislators of the Mine Health and Safety Act provide employees with the right to decide to
leave a dangerous working place, it is realized that employees could easily abuse this right. The
provision has thus been made that the mine employer is to consult with the established health and
safety committee in order to determine effective procedures for the effective exercise of this right.
S A F E T Y A N D T R A I NPage
I N G 24
SOofL107
UTIONS
WORKER
Promptly reports circumstances to
supervisor, remain in safe place
SUPERVISOR
Investigate in presence of the worker and
an H & S committee member
Agreement and /
or resolution
DISAGREEMENT
Worker continues to refuse
Worker has reasonable grounds to believe RETURN TO
work still likely to endanger himself or WORK
another worker
WORKER SUPERVISOR
Remains in safe place unless assigned to Notifies plant loss control manager
reasonable alternative work or given other Disputed equipment or workplace not to be used
directions pending investigation and decision pending investigation and decision
S A F E T Y A N D T R A I NPage
I N G 25
SOofL107
UTIONS
The mining legislation requires that all employees are competent, especially the appointees. If they are
not competent then their appointment would have very little value anyway. Ineffective appointments will
result in undue exposure for the manager, an inefficient health and safety system and a real possibility
that the Act's provisions may unknowingly be contravened, (note Regulation 2.10.2 which provides that
the manager must not allow incompetent/inexperienced persons to perform work where persons’ health
and safety may depend on proper performance.)
• Competency as defined in terms of Minerals Act Regulation 1. Whenever the mining legislation
refers to a competent person, it refers to"..... a person who :
1) has the knowledge, training, skills and experience to organize the work.
3) has been trained to recognize any potential or actual danger to health or safety in the work.
• Special competency requirements referred to in the regulations require the nomination of specific
appointees. This is usually the case where the regulations do not state that the appointee needs to
be a competent person as defined, but it sets its own competency requirements that may or may not
correspond with the definition of a competent person.
ACCOUNTABILITY
Being appointed in terms of the Mining legislation does not necessarily make an employee criminally
liable. The Mining legislation makes any contravention of its provisions an offence which means that any
employee, who contravenes the Act, can be held criminally liable. It is only when an appointee has failed
to carry out a duty imposed on him in terms of his appointment, that he will be liable by virtue of his
appointment.
FORMAT OF APPOINTMENTS
No appointment form can be comprehensive enough to include all the legal duties an appointee is
expected to fulfil. This is true even where some sections or regulations may create the need for a
specific appointment. One runs the risk of leaving out important specific and general duties by trying to
list duties comprehensively in a letter of appointment.
S A F E T Y A N D T R A I NPage
I N G 26
SOofL107
UTIONS
REPORTABLE APPOINTMENTS
In certain cases a report must be made to the Principal Inspector of Mines (formerly known as the
Regional Director) within three days of any appointment made. Copies of any appointment letters must
accompany the report. The following appointments must be reported:
Thus, an appointment in terms of these regulations is not merely done, as the wording in the regulations
suggest, helping the manager comply with the regulations, but also to assist the employer in compliance
with the Mine Health and Safety Act.
1) The CEO must take reasonable steps to ensure that the employer’s functions in terms of this Act are
properly discharged.
2) The CEO may entrust any of his functions to any person. This person would be under the control of
the CEO and must act according to his instructions.
3) If the “employer” is a body corporate (company), the Board of Directors may nominate a person to
perform the functions of a CEO in terms of this Act (i.e. where the nominated person is not the CEO
himself).
4) Nominating such a person does not relieve the employer/Board of any liability in terms of this Act.
5) The nominated person must act according to the CEO or the Board’s instructions
S A F E T Y A N D T R A I NPage
I N G 27
SOofL107
UTIONS
This is the only Section where a clear reference is made to “Chief Executive Officer” (normally the
human representative acting on behalf of the mining group). Elsewhere in the Act, where the various
Sections refer to “employer”, the true meaning is that the CEO has the liability for ensuring compliance
with the sections.
Section 2A (3) provides for the nomination of a person other than the normal CEO as the person
ultimately responsible for ensuring compliance with the provisions of the mining legislation. This person
must be a board member, and would become the “CEO” for the purposes of the Mine Health and
Safety Act.
Section 2A (4), is the adoption of the principle of vicarious liability (the employer is responsible for the
actions of the employee), into the Mine Health Act. Generally, the principle of vicarious liability is a
common law doctrine, and would not apply in a statute, unless the statute expressly provides for this to
be the case.
1) An employer of the mine may appoint any person, except a manager to perform any function
entrusted to the employer in terms of Section 4 of this Act.
• the manager or managers over whom that person has control; and
• supply the persons appointed under subsection (1) with the means to perform their functions;
and
4) The appointment of a person under subsection (1) does not relieve the employer of any duty
imposed on employers by this Act or any other law.
The amendment to the Mine Health and Safety Act has resulted in the mine manager’s role being
redefined to that of “day to day activities”. The responsibility for those activities, which would not be
“day to day to day to day”, has shifted to the employer. Such activities would include providing the
annual budget of a mine as well as major reconstruction work (i.e. Capital/Turnkey projects).
S A F E T Y A N D T R A I NPage
I N G 28
SOofL107
UTIONS
Section 4(1) enables the employer to appoint persons to assist him in ensuring compliance with the
provisions of Sections 2 and 3 of the Mine Health and Safety Act. Sections 2 and 3, deal with, inter
alia, the commissioning and construction of the mine, which would typically form part of the
responsibility of a Group consulting Engineer or Metallurgist (a category of appointees the Department
of Minerals and Energy intends to ‘target’ with statutory responsibility).
Section 7 – An employer must appoint staff to the mine with due regard to health and safety.
c) Provide appointed persons with what they would need to carry out the requirements of the Act,
or the Inspector.
d) Evaluate the employee’s training and competence before allowing him to carry out a job
function.
e) Ensure an employee is supervised by a person who understands the risks involved in the job,
and who would know what precautionary measures are required for the job.
3) The employer remains potentially liable, even though he has appointed persons to carry out
a job.
Section 7 gives the Employer the power to decide how many people he needs to help him run the
mine. This power is not absolute. If the employer does not use it “reasonably” and ensure there is
adequate staff, the Inspector could step in and decide how many persons he must appoint.
Section 7 (1) (a) means that an employee must obey any instruction given by the employer. In reality,
it would be the supervisor who gives the instruction. Note, the instruction must be reasonable and in the
interests of health and safety.
Section 7 (I) (d) basically repeats Minerals Act Regulation 2.10 which holds that the Employer must not
allow incompetent persons to carry out a job. For the supervisor, who would help the Employer in this
regard, this means a duty to carry out checks on a workplace to ensure that all the employees there
know how to perform their job, and that they do so competently.
S A F E T Y A N D T R A I NPage
I N G 29
SOofL107
UTIONS
2. The Manager
Previously, the mine manager was deemed to be responsible for all operations taking place at a mine.
Thus, notwithstanding that the Mine Health and Safety Act originally provided for the mine owner to be
the person/body ultimately responsible for ensuring health and safety, the focus of statutory prosecution
tended to remain with the manager.
The amendments to the Mine Health and Safety Act are primarily intended to redirect the focus of
ultimate responsibility for compliance (and threat of statutory sanction) from the mine manager to the
“employer” and his/its representatives, namely the Section 4(1) and 7(2) appointees.
As part of this amendment, the mine manager’s responsibility has been redefined as focusing on “day
to day responsibilities”. This would include issues such as, the induction of employees, risk assessment
and medical surveillance programs: all “normal” activities of mining.
Meaning of “Manager”
Mine Health and Safety Act Section 102 defines a Manager as:
"..... any competent person as defined in the regulations, appointed in terms of section
3(1)(a)"
"..... the person appointed to be responsible for the control, management and direction of
a mine or a works and includes the terms “General Manager”.
The Manager's functions, duties and responsibilities in general are outlined in broad terms in
Section 3. The effect of these is that a manager will:
a) Be responsible for the control and management of, and direction of the employees at the
mine. The term "employee" includes an independent contractor. The manager will do so, by
S A F E T Y A N D T R A I NPage
I N G 30
SOofL107
UTIONS
b) Take all reasonable measures to ensure the safety and health of employees and proper
discipline at the mine. The manager will do this by
• installing systems which have a purpose to ensure, as far as reasonable, the safety and
health of employees at the mine;
(c) Take all reasonable measures to ensure that the provisions of this Act are complied with
in relation to his mine. The manager will do this by ensuring the following:
• All employees are aware of the existence of the Acts and regulations.
• Non-compliance with the Acts is not tolerated.
• Competent persons have been delegated the duty to ensure that the requirements dictated by
legislation are adhered to within their individual areas of responsibility.
• A sufficient number of Regulation 2.9.2 assistants have been appointed to assist in ensuring
compliance.
Section 7
4) The manager may appoint qualified persons to carry out any of his job functions.
5) The manager remains potentially liable, even though he has delegated persons to
carry out his job functions.
A manager is required to make various appointments. Most of them are prescribed and a manager has
no choice. Failure to make these appointments constitutes an offence and in addition the manager will
be deemed to be responsible as if he is the prescribed appointee himself.
Provision has also been made for the manager to voluntarily appoint various people. If he fails to do
so, it would not be an offence although he may still be deemed responsible for non-compliance of the
regulations if no person was appointed to be responsible for compliance. It is advisable, to make use
of regulation 2.6.1 and 2.9.2 and for the manager to appoint enough competent persons to assist him in
his functions.
S A F E T Y A N D T R A I NPage
I N G 31
SOofL107
UTIONS
3. Subordinate Manager
"The manager may appoint one or more competent persons as subordinate managers to
assist him in the control, management and direction of the mine or works and every such
person shall, to an extent to be clearly defined in his letter of appointment, have the same
responsibilities under the regulations as the manager : Provided that the appointment of
such persons shall not to be taken to relieve the manager of any personal responsibility
under the regulations".
A subordinate manager will have the same responsibilities as the manager, in relation to the
subordinate manager's area of responsibility. The manager retains responsibility for the mine as a
whole. Regulation 2.6.1 requires that the extent of a subordinate manager's responsibility is clearly
defined. A subordinate manager must assist the manager in the control, management and direction of
the mine and will have the same responsibilities as the manager with regard to his area of
responsibility.
Regulation 2.9.2 enables the mine manager to appoint various employees to assist him "in enforcing
such observations of the Regulations". These assistants are appointed so that compliance will be
enforced. Although not a popular statement, they may be equated to policemen or traffic wardens.
With the above in mind, for an effective appointment, a Regulation 2.9.2 assistant should have the
necessary authority to enforce compliance. Regulation 2.9.2 assistants were sometimes regarded as a
junior subordinate manager. They were made responsible for almost anything in the Minerals Act
ranging from the issuing of mining authorization to assisting the manager in forwarding all required
statistical returns.
The category of persons normally forms the middle-rank or supervisory level. They are usually
considered the most crucial category of persons as far as implementing health and safety at a
workplace is concerned because their general function is to translate vague or general directions as
well as specific instructions from the managerial level into procedures or systems.
S A F E T Y A N D T R A I NPage
I N G 32
SOofL107
UTIONS
The Regulation 2.9.2 appointment is a general category i.e. mid-rank supervisory level with power to
give instructions. As such, a wide variety of appointments are made in terms of this regulation. Typical
examples include:
Conversely, many appointments are made in terms of a specific regulation, with functions that are
largely defined by the same set of regulations. Typical examples include:
The general characteristics of a Regulation 2.9.2 Assignee (i.e. power to give instructions, ability to
translate general directives into specific workplace procedures or instructions), are ideally suited to
appointments such as the abovementioned. The normal practice, therefore, is to appoint such persons
in terms of the prescribed regulation as well as in terms of Regulation 2.9.2 (the latter serving to confirm
their mid-rank status and power to give instructions, as may be required by the other regulations under
which they have been appointed.)
Regulation 2.9.2 merely states that a manager shall appoint such persons as may be necessary.
It does not require the appointing of competent persons as defined. By implication, these appointees
will have to be competent in the sense of possessing a good working knowledge of the Minerals Act
and its provisions and the Mine Health and Safety Act. If they are not aware of or understand the
provisions of the Acts, they cannot be expected to recognize non-compliance and enforce compliance.
Ideally, all Regulation 2.9.2 appointees must undergo training as it is very difficult to enforce
compliance when ignorant of all the general provisions. Regulation 2.9.2 appointees are advised to
make use of the expertise of the Chief and other Safety Officers.
S A F E T Y A N D T R A I NPage
I N G 33
SOofL107
UTIONS
Nature, Functions and Duties
As discussed above, a Regulation 2.9.2 assistant must assist the manager in enforcing compliance with
the Act and Regulations. For this purpose, he will need to have a very good working knowledge of the
Minerals Act and Regulations and Mine Health and Safety Act as this will be the standard against which
he will identify non-compliance. He will also need to be vested with authority to either enforce
compliance or to report contraveners to a senior manager if not to the mine manager himself.
5. Engineering Appointments
Regulations 2.13.1 to 2.13.12 set out the requirements regarding the responsibility for machinery.
Engineering appointees usually all qualify as competent persons as they are in possession of
certificates of competency. A certificate of competency implies a good working knowledge of the
provisions of the Mining legislation and knowledge of the Mine Health and Safety Act,
• the designated rating a machinery used in the generation of power combined with the power from
external sources exceeds 2500Kw
• winding plants used for transporting persons are installed.
An Engineer in general charge must be appointed (the manager has no discretion, here.). This person
must have a certificate of compliance. Regulations 28.1.1 to 28.50 set out the requirements relating to
certificates of competency in great detail. Of particular interest would be Regulation 28.22.1 to 28.24
which relate to Mechanical and Electrical Engineers’ certificates.
Regulation 2.13.3.1 provides that the Manager may appoint one or more subordinate (area) engineer/s
to assist the Engineer in general charge.
• This person would report directly to the Engineer in general charge, or via a subordinate engineer
(Regulation 2.13.2 chief engineer), and
• Be responsible for carrying out the specific functions set out in his letter of appointment.
The appointment of this person does not relieve the Engineer in general charge, or the subordinate
engineer appointed under Regulation 2.13.3.2 of any potential liability.
An area engineer must also have a certificate, although a non-certificated, but competent person may
assume his responsibility up to 60 days in a 6 month period.
Regulation 2.13.3.2 provides that the Manager may appoint subordinate (chief) engineers to assist the
engineer in general charge in directing and controlling subordinate (area) engineers appointed in terms
of Regulation 2.13.3.1 Such an engineer must at all times have a certificate. This engineer would
have the same responsibility as the engineer in general charge although only for that area of
responsibility demarcated to him.
S A F E T Y A N D T R A I NPage
I N G 34
SOofL107
UTIONS
As with all other prescribed appointments, an engineer's appointment must ideally not refer only to
certain regulations. There are many provisions they need to be aware of, that have force of law but are
not contained in the regulations. Some examples are: Codes of practice, permits, permissions,
exemptions, directives, requirements relating to the supply and repair of machinery, etc.
Again, engineers should be clearly advised on their respective areas of responsibility. The reporting
structure must also be clearly established and all the necessary systems and documents must be
supplied to them to enable them to carry out their responsibilities.
Regulation 2.13.4.1 sets out the general responsibilities of the Engineer in general charge. The
following would, in turn, be delegated to the subordinate engineers:
• safe installation and proper operation, running and maintenance of all machinery at the colliery
• safe erection and proper maintenance of all buildings, structures and tanks
• reasonable measures must be taken to ensure that
− all appliances, mechanisms and guards are maintained in good condition
− the Acts and Regulations relating to machinery are complied with
− any apparatus which, while operating, poses a danger, is stopped.
Although all of the Regulations are important, the following chapters have particular relevance to his
responsibility:
S A F E T Y A N D T R A I NPage
I N G 35
SOofL107
UTIONS
The Engineer's responsibility mainly relates to machinery. Machinery is defined in Section 1 of the
Minerals Act as:
" ... any engine, boiler or appliance or a combination thereof which is situated on a
Mines or Works and which is used or intended to be used :
6. Production Foremen
Regulation 2.13.12, provides that persons with the permission of the Principal Inspector may control
Such persons need to familiarize themselves with the Regulations pertaining to machinery, especially
Chapter 20. The following are some of the more important Regulations to be aware of:
S A F E T Y A N D T R A I NPage
I N G 36
SOofL107
UTIONS
7. Shifts man
Chapter 20 of the Minerals Act Regulations refers to special safety measures to be adopted in relation
to machinery. It is sometimes the practice to appoint shifts men in terms of Regulation 20.1.1. The
Regulation does not specifically provide that such a person has to be appointed. It merely states as
fact that the operation of machinery shall be in the charge of a competent shifts man who will exercise
effective control of any unskilled persons working under his direction.
The Ganger or Miner in charge is the main person of responsibility where supervision of blasting
operations is concerned (as per Chapter 8 of the Minerals Act Regulations).
• His main duty is to ensure that a workplace where blasting is to occur is made as safe as possible
before and after the blasting.
• He must also safeguard persons from dangerous areas, falling rocks, as well as remove the
workers upon a complaint of danger by any worker.
• He must remain at the workplace until the shift has been removed.
• He must conduct regular inspections including tests for flammable gas.
• Regulation 8.10 sets out the duties with regard to explosives, misfired holes.
• He must report any gassing to the Manager, Mine Overseer or Shift Boss.
Chapter 9 of the Minerals Act Regulations deals with the handling of explosives. Regulation 9.1.1
places this responsibility upon a competent person –“competent”, here, meaning holding a blasting
certificate.
The Manager also has certain duties as regards assisting the Ganger. They are as follows:
S A F E T Y A N D T R A I NPage
I N G 37
SOofL107
UTIONS
9. Mine Surveyor
In terms of Regulation 2.12.1 to 2.12.12, provision is made for the appointment of a mine surveyor or a
competent person who will assume the responsibility of a mine surveyor.
• If more than 200 persons are employed in the workings of any mine, mine surveying will be under
the general charge of a certificated mine surveyor appointed in writing by the manager.
• If there are less than 200 persons so employed, mine surveying will be under the charge of either a
certificated mine surveyor or a competent person.
In terms of Regulation 2.12.7 the manager may appoint assistant certificated mine surveyors to assist
the mine surveyor referred to in Regulation 2.12.1
Regulation 2.12.8 sets out the general duties of a surveyor. They are as follows:
• Inform the manager in writing when the face of a working area which is being advanced comes
within an excavation, water, mine boundary or source of gas/ fumes
• Ensure the correct establishment of survey pegs and provide the manager with relevant survey
data, in writing. The precautions must remain until a holding is effected or the face of the working
recedes from the 15-meter distance.
• Keep a map of the underground workings, showing ventilation systems and airflow. The map shall
never be more than 3 months out of date.
• In addition, the mine surveyor must familiarize himself with the provisions of Chapter 12, and sign
the plans provided for in that chapter.
Regulation 2.16.1 requires, in various instances, the appointment of an environmental control officer
who must be a competent person with a qualification in mine environmental control. The manager may
appoint or shall appoint, if so required by the Principal Inspector (Director: Mineral Development), more
than one competent person provided that each ones area of responsibility is clearly defined in his letter
of appointment.
Regulation 2.16.1.3 sets out an environmental control officer's duties, functions and responsibilities.
He must examine environmental conditions on the mine, and record the findings in a file or book. In
addition, he must submit suggestions where unsatisfactory conditions are detected. He must sign this
recording. The examination must cover the following areas:
S A F E T Y A N D T R A I NPage
I N G 38
SOofL107
UTIONS
Regulation 2.17.1 states that the mine manager shall, if there are more than 300 employees at a mine;
appoint a safety officer who shall devote all his time to the functions assigned to a safety officer by or
under the regulations. A safety officer has the following functions:
• Inspecting the workplace and machinery at regular intervals to ensure compliance with the Act,
Regulation 2.17.4 provides for the appointment of a chief safety officer if more than one safety officer
has been appointed. The chief safety officer must, in addition to the functions of a safety officer,
perform the functions of a chief safety officer as prescribed below:
S A F E T Y A N D T R A I NPage
I N G 39
SOofL107
UTIONS
Regulation 2.17.2 requires the following level of competence from the Chief Safety Officer and Safety
Officers:
a) “By virtue of his training, knowledge and experience be able to identify any threat or
potential threat to the safety or health of persons employed in or at the mine..;
b) Be conversant with the applicable requirements relating to the safety and health of
employees, whether or not those requirements have the force of law.”
Where the number of employees exceeds 50, an organization must be established for fire-prevention
and fire-control. In addition, the manager must
• enforce a code of practice, approved by him, for the organization of fire prevention, fire fighting and
fire drill; and
• Appoint one or more competent persons, in writing, who must examine all the equipment and
material provided for fire fighting.
This person must carry out his examinations at least monthly and record the results in a book provided
specifying deviations. The report must be examined and signed by the manager within three days.
Regulation 5.1 (1) The employer must ensure that a competent person reports to the
employer, at appropriate intervals determined in accordance with the mine's risk
assessment-
(a) the effectiveness of the precautionary measures taken to prevent or suppress
explosions of coal dust or flammable gas; and
(b) the adequacy of measures in place to prevent, detect and combat the start and
spread of mine fires.
Reference is made to the following Guidelines issued by the Chief Inspector of
Mines in terms of section 9(2) of this Act:
(i) Guideline for the Compilation of a Mandatory Code of Practice for the Prevention
of Coal Dust and Flammable Gas Explosions: Ref.: DME 16/3/2/1-A1
(ii) Guideline for the Compilation of a Mandatory Code of Practice for the Prevention
of Flammable Gas Explosions in Mines Other than Coal DME 16/3/2/1-A2
S A F E T Y A N D T R A I NPage
I N G 40
SOofL107
UTIONS
Regulations 11.3 to 11.11 together with the relevant codes of practice (organization of fire-prevention,
fire-fighting and fire-drill and installation, operation, maintenance and patrolling of the belt conveyor
system) provide for precautions against fires at a mine.
The appointed person should examine on at least a monthly basis, all the equipment and material
provided for fire-fighting and record his findings as above. It is also advisable to appoint this person in
terms of Regulation 2.9.2 to assist in enforcing all provisions regarding precautions against fire. This
can be done in the same letter of appointment.
Regulations
Collisions between trackless mobile machines and pedestrians
8.10(1) The employer must take reasonably practicable measures to ensure that pedestrian are
prevented from being injured as a result of collisions between trackless mobile machines and
pedestrian. At any mine where there is a significant risk of such collisions, such measures must include
at least the following;
8.10.(1)(1) All electrically or battery powered trackless mobile machines, excluding shovels, bucket
wheel excavators and overburden drills, must be provided with means to automatically detect the
presence of any pedestrian within its vicinity. Upon detecting the presence of a pedestrian, the operator
of the trackless mobile machine and the pedestrian must be warned of each other's presence by means
of an effective warning. In the event where no action is taken to prevent potential collision, further
means must be provided to retard the trackless mobile machine to a safe speed where after the brakes
of the trackless mobile machine are automatically applied without human intervention.
All underground diesel powered trackless mobile machines must be provided with means:
8.10.(1)(2)(a) to automatically detect the presence of any pedestrian within its vicinity. Upon detecting
the presence of a pedestrian, the operator of the diesel powered trackless mobile machine and the
pedestrian shall be warned of each other's presence by means of an effective warning; and
(b) in the event where no action is taken to prevent potential collision, further means shall be provided to
retard the diesel powered trackless mobile machine to a safe speed where after the brakes of the diesel
powered trackless mobile machine are automatically applied. The prevent potential collision system on
the diesel powered trackless mobile machine must fail to safe without human intervention
S A F E T Y A N D T R A I NPage
I N G 41
SOofL107
UTIONS
8.10(2) The employer must take reasonably practicable measures to ensure that persons are prevented
from being injured as a result of collisions between diesel powered trackless mobile machines. At any
opencast or open pit mine where there is a significant risk of such collisions, such measures must
include:
8.10.2(1) Every diesel powered trackless mobile machine must be provided with means to automatically
detect the presence of any other diesel powered trackless mobile machine within its vicinity; and
8.10.2(1)(a)upon detecting the presence of another diesel powered trackless mobile machine, the
operators of both diesel powered trackless mobile machines shall be warned of each other's presence
by means of an effective warning; and
8.10.2.1(b) in the event where no action is taken to prevent potential collision, further means shall be
provided to retard the diesel powered trackless mobile machine to a safe speed where after the brakes
of the diesel powered trackless mobile machine are automatically applied. The prevent potential collision
system on the diesel powered trackless mobile machine must "fail to safe" without human intervention.
8.10.(2)(2) The employer must take reasonably practicable measures to ensure that persons are
prevented from being injured as a result of collisions between trackless mobile machines and rail bound
equipment. At underground operations where there ie a significant risk of such collisions, such
measures must include warning the operators of the trackless mobile machine and the locomotive of
each other's presence by means of an effective warning.
8.10(3) The employer must take reasonably practicable measures to prevent trackless mobile machines
running uncontrolled.
8.10(5) The employer must take reasonably practicable measures to ensure that persons are prevented
from being injured as a result of objects falling onto operators and/or passengers of trackless mobile
machines. Trackless mobile machines must be fitted with falling object protection structures to protect
operators and passengers from falling objects if required in terms of the mine's risk assessment.
S A F E T Y A N D T R A I NPage
I N G 42
SOofL107
UTIONS
Persons inadvertently falling out of or being ejected from trackless mobile machines.
8.10(6) The employer must take reasonably practicable measures to ensure that persons are prevented
from being injured as a result of operators and/or passengers inadvertently falling out of or being ejected
from any trackless mobile machine in motion.
Braking systems
8.10(7) The employer must take reasonably practicable measures to ensure that persons are prevented
from being injured as a result of brake failure. Such measures must include ensuring:
8.10.(7)(1) that trackless mobile machines are operated with adequate and effective braking systems;
8.10.(7)(2) all braking systems are adequately and routinely tested for intended functionality;
8.10.(7)(3) all braking systems are regularly maintained; and
8.10.(7)(4) that where a combined braking system is used, the design of the braking system is such that
it complies with the requirements for the separate systems and that it fails to safe.
The employer must take reasonably practicable measures to ensure that persons are prevented from
being injured as a result of restricted operator visibility.
8.10(9) The employer must take reasonably practicable measures to ensure that persons are prevented
from being injured as a result of fatigue of operators. Such measures must include a fatigue
management procedure for operators.
8.10(10) The employer must take reasonably practicable measures to ensure that battery charging
facilities are ergonomically designed, constructed and equipped with the following:
S A F E T Y A N D T R A I NPage
I N G 43
SOofL107
UTIONS
8.10(11) The employer must take reasonably practicable measures to ensure that diesel refuelling
facilities are ergonomically designed, constructed and equipped with the following:
(a) SANS 10089-1 (2008): The petroleum industry Part 1: Storage and distribution of petroleum
products in above-ground bulk installations.
(b) SANS 10089-2 (2007): The petroleum industry Part 2: Electrical and other installations in the
distribution and marketing sector.
(c) SANS 10089-3 (2010): The petroleum industry Part 3: The installation, modification, and
decommissioning of underground storage tanks, pumps/dispensers and pipe work at service
stations and consumer installations.
8.10(12) The employer must take reasonably practicable measures to ensure that procedures are
prepared and implemented to prevent persons from being injured as a result of the use, storage and
handling of wheels, tyres and rims.
8.10(13) The employer must take reasonably practicable measures to ensure that trackless mobile
machines are designed, constructed and maintained such that persons getting on and off, or working on
them can do so safely.
Visibility of trackless mobile machines, skid mounted machinery and trailers to persons.
8.10(14) The employer must take reasonably practicable measures to ensure that trackless mobile
machines, skid mounted machinery and trailers are visible to persons in their vicinity.
8.10(15) The employer must take reasonably practicable measures to ensure that unauthorised persons
do not ride on or operate trackless mobile machines.
S A F E T Y A N D T R A I NPage
I N G 44
SOofL107
UTIONS
Isolation and lock-out of trackless mobile machines
8.10(16) The employer must take reasonably practicable measures to ensure that procedures are
prepared and implemented for the safe isolation and lockout of trackless mobile machines.
Operating procedures
8.10(17) The employer must take reasonably practicable measures to ensure that procedures are
prepared and implemented for the safe operation of trackless mobile machines.
8.10(18) The employer must take reasonably practicable measures to ensure that procedures and
standards are prepared and implemented for maintaining trackless mobile machines in a safe operating
condition.
8.10(19) The employer must take reasonably practicable measures to ensure that remote control
devices for trackless mobile machines using a wireless remote control device comply with:
Trailers
S A F E T Y A N D T R A I NPage
I N G 45
SOofL107
UTIONS
8.10(21) The employer must take reasonably practicable measures to ensure that procedures are
prepared and implemented for the safe recovery and towing of trackless mobile machines.
Roadway conditions
8.10(22) The employer must take reasonably practicable measures to ensure that the design,
construction and maintenance of roadways are appropriate for the type and category of trackless mobile
machine
8.10(23)(1) The employer must take reasonably practicable measures to ensure that procedures are
prepared and implemented for the selection, training, appointment and licensing of trackless mobile
machine operators, which procedures must include:
i) the trackless mobile machine types which the operator may operate;
ii) date of issue and expiry date; and
iii) the operator's company identification number.
S A F E T Y A N D T R A I NPage
I N G 46
SOofL107
UTIONS
Pre-use inspection procedures
8.10(24) The employer must take reasonably practicable measures to ensure that procedures are
prepared and implemented for inspecting trackless mobile machines immediately prior to use, which
procedures must include:
8.10(24)(1) that the operator of the trackless mobile machines physically inspects and ensures that the
brakes, lights and any other defined safety features and devices are functioning as intended prior to
setting such trackless mobile machines in motion;
8.10(24)(2) pre-use check lists that have to be completed by all operators of trackless mobile machines
at the beginning of their shift. Such check lists must clearly identify all the components, features and
functionalities to be inspected by the operator. For each component, feature or functionality, the check
list must clearly indicate the pre-established criteria under which the trackless mobile machines may or
may not be put in motion.
8.10(28) Regulations 8.10.23 and 8.10.27 do not apply to trackless mobile machines licensed under the
National Road Transportation Act 2000 and not used for primary mining activities.
S A F E T Y A N D T R A I NPage
I N G 47
SOofL107
UTIONS
Miner
• Confirm the presence of methane in the working face with at least two instruments
• If positive, switch off all power in a radius of 30 meters (adjacent faces)
• Stop all work within a radius of 30 meters and fence off the adjacent faces
• Test for gas in all the faces up to the return air exit
• Report the gas to control room and the shift boss
• Fill in a Fireman’s report
• Take the necessary people to clear the gas
• Clear the gas with adequate ventilation and spraying of water
• If the gas is cleared, remove the fences of the adjacent faces and resume work
Work may only resume in the face where methane has been detected, once a shift boss, mine overseer
or a manager confirmed that no methane is present. The shift boss, mine overseer or manager must
sign the Fireman’s report that the gas has been cleared
• Monitor for the presence gas every hour for the next 24 hours
The safe guarding of flexible trailing cables must be monitored in accordance with specified
requirements and should be controlled as follows:
S A F E T Y A N D T R A I NPage
I N G 48
SOofL107
UTIONS
Drilling
• Good ventilation
• Sharp drill bits
• Use of dust collector
Blasting
• Good ventilation
• Water down after blasting
• Efficient use of explosives
Loading
• Good ventilation
• Water down whilst loading
Dust samples are taken on a regular basis in all underground sections and in accordance with the
DME directives. This includes the following:
• At the vicinity of all operating machines, in accordance to the codes of practice requirements. Will
have a standard stipulating not more than 2mgrams/cubic metre (2mg/m3).
• Personal sampling, where employees carry the dust sampling pump over an eight hour shift
anywhere in the section, quantities of dust not to exceed 2mgram/cubic metre (2mg/m3).
Dust poses a high risk to employees. Legal controls such as the following must be implemented:
The employer must ensure that sufficient potable and palatable water, which comply with the
requirements set out in Schedule 22.9(2)(c), is readily available to all employees and clearly identified
as drinkable.
S A F E T Y A N D T R A I NPage
I N G 49
SOofL107
UTIONS
Section 25(1) of the Mine Health and Safety Act stipulates that every mine with 20 or more employees
must have a health and safety representative for each shift and at each designated workplace on the
mine.
The employer must have designated working places at the mine in accordance with a collective
agreement concluded with the employee representatives. The designation must be such that:
• no representative is responsible for more than 50 employees in a working place if the designated
working place includes separate working places.
Section 28(1) stipulates that the employee must have the following qualifications to be a health and
safety representative:
He must be:
• employed in a full-time capacity in the designated workplace; and
• be acquainted with conditions and activities at the designated workplace.
A health and safety representative may amongst other things do the following:
• Direct any employee to leave a working place which, with reasonable justification, appears to pose
a danger to the employee’s health and safety.
• Assist any employee who has left a working place because of serious danger.
S A F E T Y A N D T R A I NPage
I N G 50
SOofL107
UTIONS
• Make representations or recommendations to the manager or health and safety committee on any
matter affecting the health and safety of employees.
• Inspect any relevant document which must be kept in terms of this Act.
• Request an inspector to conduct an investigation in terms of Section 60; or the Chief inspector to
conduct an inquiry in terms of Section 65.
• Participate in consultations on health and safety or in any health and safety inspection with the
manager or his representative or an inspector.
• Inspect working places with regard to the health and safety of employees.
• Examine the causes of accidents and other dangerous occurrences in collaboration with
management.
Representatives may perform their functions and receive training during ordinary working hours.
The rights and powers of representatives are only in respect of the working place for which they are
responsible. Note Section 25 (3) which provides that a health and safety representative or a member of a
health and safety committee, does not incur any civil liability by reason of an act or omission performed as
required by the Mine Health and Safety Act.
Section 31 (1) provides that the employer must pay every full-time health and safety representative
appropriate remuneration, at least equal to what he earned immediately before being appointed as a full-
time health and safety representative. The manager must provide health and safety representatives with
• training that is reasonably required to enable them to perform their functions; and
• time off from work, without loss of remuneration, to attend any training course that is agreed or
prescribed.
S A F E T Y A N D T R A I NPage
I N G 51
SOofL107
UTIONS
Section 32 provides that the employer must notify the health and safety representatives concerned and,
if there is a health and safety committee, the employee co-chairperson of the committee
• in good time of inspections, investigations or inquiries of which an inspector has notified the
manager; and
ESTABLISHMENT OF COMMITTEES
Every mine with 100 or more employees must have at least one health and safety committee. (Section
25 (2))
COMMITTEE PROCEDURES
Employee and management representatives on a health and safety committee must each elect a
chairperson. Unless otherwise agreed to by the committee, the two chairpersons must alternate as the
presiding chairperson of the committee.
Unless otherwise agreed to by a health and safety committee the committee must meet at least once a
month. The committee is entitled to set its own rules and proceedings for dealing with its agenda.
• Represent employees on health and safety matters, and participate in the schedule provided for such
issues (Section 97(2));
• Request the Chief Inspector to review a Code of Practice;
• Agree on qualifications required of candidate Health and Safety Representatives;
• Request a formal investigation or inquiry from the Chief Inspector;
• Request the assistance of an expert for its proceedings.
The employer must provide the health and safety committee with the facilities and assistance reasonably
necessary to perform its functions.
(Refer to Schedule 1 to the Act which contains guidelines for determining the number of Full-Time Health
and Safety Representatives.)
S A F E T Y A N D T R A I NPage
I N G 52
SOofL107
UTIONS
APPOINTMENTS TO BE MADE
This provision is equally applicable to the appointment of full - time and part - time Health and Safety
Representatives.
NB: the Act does not specifically state that a health and Safety Representative must be appointed as a
committee member as well. The closest indication thereto is an indirect reference to the membership of
the Health and Safety Representative, in Section 30 (1) (i), which furthermore provides that the Health
and Safety Representative may attend the meeting of any committee which is prepared to listen to his
representations.
• record the significant hazards identified, and their risk factor; and
• make the records of the hazards and risks available to the employees.
S A F E T Y A N D T R A I NPage
I N G 53
SOofL107
UTIONS
3) The Employer must set up a system for implementing the measures needed to i) eliminate; ii)
control; iii) minimize; iv) monitor the risk.
MHSA prescribes that employers are to ensure as far as is reasonably practicable that the requirements
of the Act are implemented, and the risk assessment process is the cornerstone of such implementation
of requirements.
The employer and manager should make an attempt to participate in the various exercises carried out in
industry. It would obviously not be possible to participate in every exercise being undertaken.
Where such participation is possible, it should be scheduled to involve both the sophisticated exercises
carried out on major plant and machinery, as well as the minor exercises e.g. a general workplace
inspection.
It is furthermore important that the employer, and even more so, the manager, attempt to see the results
of as many risk assessment exercises as possible. In this regard, the risk-assessment reports should
include space for comments by the manager and they should carry his signature.
Many people already carry out Hazard-Identification and Risk-Assessment on a day-to-day basis.
However, the Act and Regulations require that this process be systematic, that the results be recorded
and that recommendations be implemented.
S A F E T Y A N D T R A I NPage
I N G 54
SOofL107
UTIONS
ACCIDENTS TO BE REPORTED
23.1. The employer must report to the Principal Inspector of Mines, in the manner prescribed in this
chapter, any accident at the mine that results in the following:
(a) The death of any employee
(b) An injury, to any employee, likely to be fatal
(c) Unconsciousness, incapacitation from heatstroke or heat exhaustion, oxygen deficiency, the
inhalation of fumes or poisonous gas, or electric shock or electric burn accidents (all accidents
which are not already reportable in terms of paragraph (d)
(d) An injury which either incapacitates the injured employee from performing that employee's
normal or a similar occupation for a period totalling 14 days or more, or which causes the injured
employee to suffer the loss of a limb, or a part of a limb, or sustain a permanent disability
(e) An injury, other than injuries referred to in paragraph (d), which incapacitates the injured
employee preventing him from performing his normal or a similar occupation on the next calendar
day.
23.2. (1) An accident referred to in paragraph (a), (b) or (c) of regulation 23.1 must be reported
immediately by the quickest means available and must be confirmed without delay on Forms
SAMRASS 1 and 2 prescribed in Chapter 21.
23.2. (2) An accident referred to in paragraph (d) of regulation 23.1 must, after the accident becomes
reportable, be reported within three days on Forms SAMRASS 1 and 2 prescribed in Chapter 21.
23.2. (3) The Form SAMRASS 9 must be submitted on a monthly basis for all persons not having
returned to work at the time of submitting SAMRASS 2 on a monthly basis.
23.2. (4) An accident referred to in paragraph (e) of regulation 23.1 must be reported without delay on a
monthly basis, on Form SAMRASS 4 prescribed in Chapter 21.
23.3. (1) Where the death of an employee, referred to in regulation 23.1(a) is related to a rock burst
or fall of ground, the duly completed Form SAMRASS 3, prescribed in Chapter 21, for such rock
bursts or falls of ground, must be forwarded by the employer to the Principal Inspector of Mines
within 14 days of such death.
23.3. (2) When an injury results in the death of the injured employee after the report in terms of
regulation 23.1 (b), (c), (d) or (e) has been given or when a slight injury, which was not reportable,
results in the death of the injured employee, or when general sepsis or tetanus develops as a
result of an injury, the employer must immediately report it to the Principal Inspector of Mines and
without delay submit amended Form SAMRASS 1 prescribed in Chapter 21.
S A F E T Y A N D T R A I NPage
I N G 55
SOofL107
UTIONS
23.3. (3) Where the injury of a person referred to in regulation 23 (1) or a dangerous occurrence
referred to in regulation 23.4 (o), is related to the use of explosives, in addition to Form
SAMRASS 1, the duly completed Form SAMRASS 5, prescribed in Chapter 21, must be
forwarded by the employer to the Principal Inspector of Mines within 14 days of such occurrence.
23.3. (4) Where the injury of a person referred to in regulation 23 (1) or a dangerous occurrence
referred to in regulation 23.4 (f) is related to fires, in addition to Form SAMRASS 1, the duly
completed Form SAMRASS 6, prescribed in Chapter 21, must be forwarded by the employer to
the Principal Inspector of Mines within 14 days of such occurrence.
23.3. (5) Where the injury of a person referred to in regulation 23 (1) or a dangerous occurrence
referred to in regulation 23.4 (b) is related to a subsidence in a coal mine, in addition to Form
SAMRASS 1, the duly completed Form SAMRASS 7, prescribed in Chapter 21, must be
forwarded by the employer to the Principal Inspector of Mines within 14 days of such occurrence.
23.3. (6) Where the injury of a person referred to in regulation 23 (1) is related to heat stroke or heat
exhaustion, in addition to Form SAMRASS 1, the duly completed Form SAMRASS 8, prescribed
in Chapter 21, must be forwarded by the employer to the Principal Inspector of Mines within 14
days of such occurrence.
23.4. The employer must report to the Principal Inspector of Mines in the manner prescribed in this
Chapter any of the following dangerous occurrences at the mine:
An extensive rock burst or fall of ground must be reported, when the following damage has been
inflicted:
(i) At least 10 linear meters of working face has been severely damaged and choked and will
require re-establishment and re-supporting, or be abandoned.
(ii) At least 25 square meters of working area has been severely damaged and choked
rendering support units ineffectual and will have to be re-established and re-supported or be
abandoned.
(iii) At least 10 linear meters of gully has been restricted with rock that has clearly been
displaced recently from the hanging wall and gully sidewalls.
(iv) At least 10 linear meters continuous or 30 linear meters cumulative of access ways of tunnel
or travelling way has been severely damaged and will require rehabilitation or be
abandoned.
S A F E T Y A N D T R A I NPage
I N G 56
SOofL107
UTIONS
(iv) At least 10 square meters of roof or 5 cubic meters of rock has been displaced from the roof
of the mining cavity or excavation.
(vi) At least 10 cubic meters of rock has been freshly displaced from pillars or tunnel sidewalls.
(b) CAVING
Any unplanned or uncontrolled caving, side wall or slope failure or subsidence in the ground or
workings, causing damage to the surface, which may pose a significant risk to the safety of persons
at a mine.
(c) FLOW OF BROKEN ROCK
Any unplanned or uncontrolled flow of broken rock, mud or slimes in the workings of a mine which
may pose a significant risk to the safety of persons at a mine.
S A F E T Y A N D T R A I NPage
I N G 57
SOofL107
UTIONS
suspended or attached load, fracture of guide rope or its connections, fracture of balance or tail
rope or its connections;
(iv) Fracture or failure of winding or balance sheave; fracture or failure of any essential part of
the headgear or other sheave support;
(v) Jamming or accidental overturning of conveyance; conveyance or its load fouling shaft
equipment; jamming of crosshead;
(vi) Derailing of conveyance;
(vii) Conveyance, bridle, frame or crosshead accidentally leaving guides;
(viii) Fracture or failure of the braking system or of any critical parts thereof;
(ix) Failure to activate when required of any safety catches and/or arresting devices or activation
of any safety catches and/or arresting devices when not required;
(x) Failure to activate when required of any over winding prevention device or activation of such
device when not required;
(xi) Any over wind or over-run of the conveyance to an extent which may have endangered
persons or may have caused damage to the winding equipment;
(xii) Failure of depth indicator.
S A F E T Y A N D T R A I NPage
I N G 58
SOofL107
UTIONS
n) CHAIRLIFTS
i) Fracture or failure of any part or safety device of a chairlift installation which may have
endangered persons or may have caused damage to such chairlift installation.
ii) Fracture or failure of any essential part of the driving machinery.
iii) Fracture failure or serious distortion of any rope or chain forming part of a chairlift installation.
o) EXPLOSIVES
i) Any unauthorised or accidental ignition or detonation of explosives.
ii) Any exposure of persons to blasting fumes which is not reportable in terms of regulation 23.1.
iii) Any detonation of explosives which may pose a significant risk to the safety of persons.
23.5 A dangerous occurrence referred to in regulation 23.4 must be reported immediately by the quickest
means available and must be confirmed without delay on Form SAMRASS 1 prescribed in Chapt 21.
23.6 Every employer must ensure that a system is in place whereby the employer is informed, as soon as
is practicable after its occurrence, of any accident or dangerous occurrence, which is reportable in
terms of this Chapter.
23.7 i) Every employer must keep and maintain a record in which the particulars of all accidents and
dangerous occurrences, which are required to be reported in terms of this Chapter, must be
recorded without delay.
ii) The record contemplated in Regulation 23.7(i) in respect of all accidents or dangerous
occurrences must be kept and maintained for two years from the time that the accident or
dangerous occurrence becomes reportable.
Section 11 (5)
S A F E T Y A N D T R A I NPage
I N G 59
SOofL107
UTIONS
6) The Employer must consult with the Health and Safety Committee on this investigation.
5) The Employer must conduct the investigation in co-operation with the Health and Safety
Representative responsible for the workplace where the incident took place.
5) The Employer must provide the Health and Safety Committee or responsible Health and
Safety Representative with a copy of this report.
6) The investigation may be carried out jointly with an investigation, which the Inspector
may carry out.
1. The Employer must as far as reasonably practicable ensure each employee is familiar with
the risks related to his job and workplace, and what steps to take to prevent the risk.
S A F E T Y A N D T R A I NPage
I N G 60
SOofL107
UTIONS
EDUCATION AND TRAINING - LEGAL REFERENCES
• provide employees with training, information and supervision needed for them to perform their
jobs safely; and
• ensure each employee is familiar with the risks related to his job and workplace, and what
steps to take to prevent the risk.
S A F E T Y A N D T R A I NPage
I N G 61
SOofL107
UTIONS
OCCUPATIONAL HYGIENE
MHSA generally requires the employer to ensure the workplace is healthy and safe to work in. In order
for the employer to find out how to make his workplace healthy and safe, he needs to use a risk-
assessment program that would inform him of the hazards.
Whereas the normal risk-assessment would look at safety hazards, the hygiene surveillance program
focuses on what conditions in the workplace would make an employee ill - it is not about focusing on
what injuries he could sustain.
Only in recent times have peopled realized that dangers in the workplace are not only related to safety,
and under MHSA, hygiene is recognized as being as important as safety.
The employer must keep a record of all occupational measurements that can be linked, as far as is
practicable, to each employee’s record of medical surveillance.
Although the Mine Health and Safety Act expressly include “health” in addition to “safety” as primary
objectives, the focus on “hygiene” is as important as “health”: these two elements are deeply
interrelated, and an effective surveillance program would have to focus on both elements. Generally,
the hygiene hazards in a workplace would result in health exposure to an employee.
“BIOLOGICAL MONITORING” - a planned program of periodic collection and analysis of body fluid,
tissues, excreta or exhaled air in order to detect and quantify the exposure to, or absorption of, any
substance or organism
“HEALTH HAZARD” - any physical, chemical or biological hazard to health, including anything
declared to be a health hazard by the Minister
“HEALTH-THREATENING OCCURRENCE” - any occurrence that has or may have the potential to
cause serious illness or damage to health
“HEALTHY” – when a person is free from illness or injury attributable to occupational causes
“OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH” - the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of illness, injury and adverse
health effects associated with a particular type of work
S A F E T Y A N D T R A I NPage
I N G 62
SOofL107
UTIONS
4) The Employer must provide them with the resources they need to perform their jobs.
6) The Employer may employ a medical practitioner until an occupational medical practitioner
can be employed.
S A F E T Y A N D T R A I NPage
I N G 63
SOofL107
UTIONS
9) The Employer must keep records of:
Section 13 must be read in conjunction with Section 20 which provides an employee with the right to
appeal to the Medical Inspector against the finding that he is medically unfit to perform any particular
category of work. This is equally true of the findings contained in the medical exit certificate issued to the
employee. Such an appeal by the employee concerned is, however, to be lodged within 30 days of the
relevant decision or findings, and must state the grounds for the appeal.
Nothing however precludes the employer in question from obtaining an additional medical opinion from
another medical practitioner, and paying for such an opinion, or from pursuing any other legal remedy.
1) The Employer must keep a service record of employees who perform work requiring
medical surveillance.
2) The Employer must provide the Medical Inspector with a copy of the records for an
employee when:
• the employee stops working at the mine; and/or
• required to do so by the Chief Inspector.
• must keep them safe for 40 years, and ensure they are not destroyed.
S A F E T Y A N D T R A I NPage
I N G 64
SOofL107
UTIONS
The person vested with the responsibility of storing the records would have to consider the security of
storage facilities. The ideal practice in this regard is the storage of data on microfilm, and the storage
of microfilm in impenetrable, fireproof safes off-site of the mine.
No guidelines have been issued by the Department of Minerals and Energy as to the required format or
content of such annual reports. The ideal format, however, would serve to provide a convenient
document with easily read statistics for the benefit of the Mine Health and Safety Council, and could
include the following:
• lists of the full and part-time medical staff, with their qualifications
• the health-risk-assessment elements carried out on employees
• statistics on abnormalities detected, and cases reported
• add a copy of the exit certificates to the employee’s medial surveillance records.
S A F E T Y A N D T R A I NPage
I N G 65
SOofL107
UTIONS
All clinical examinations and medical tests are to be paid for by the Employer.
The employee is entitled to a copy of the medical records or any part of it that relates to
him.
• the article is safe i.e. not a danger to health/safety if properly used; and
2) Any person who erects/installs an article must ensure this is done safety and without
risk to health.
3) Any person, who designs, manufactures, erects or installs any article must as far as
reasonably practicable, incorporate ergonomic principles into the article.
4) The manufacturer, supplier, installer is relieved of his liability if the receiver of the
article gives a written undertaking to ensure that:
• the article will be safe and not a danger to health and safety when properly used; and
5) Any person who designs/constructs a building (even a temporary one) must ensure
that it is safe and not a danger to health and safety.
S A F E T Y A N D T R A I NPage
I N G 66
SOofL107
UTIONS
The “proper use” requirement of the article indicates a further duty on the manufacturer to supply the
user with all such information, so as to ensure that the user is able to use the article in the proper
manner. Such information relates to operating instructions, or the attributes of the article. Section 21 (4)
furthermore, makes a direct reference to information to be supplied, relating to the risks involved with
substances.
Section 21 (2) does, however, provide the manufacturer (as defined) with limited relief of the duty
imposed by his Section, by providing for the manufacturer to contract out of liability. The effectiveness
of such an undertaking will, however, be limited by a requirement of reasonableness. These conditions
could, however, be incorporated into the mine’s agreement of sale. The buyer must be informed that he
has assumed the risk, and provide the seller with such a written undertaking.
Moreover, the statutory provisions of Section 21 cannot be contracted out of by means of the
“Voetstoots” clause, where the article is to be used at another mine, or at an industry (in which case, the
similar statutory provisions of Section 10 of the Occupational Health and Safety Act would apply). It
should be added that “supply” includes the giving away or donating of any article etc. All articles and
substances must therefore be sold with the necessary information to ensure the safe and healthy use
thereof.
HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES
3) Any person who manufacturers, imports or supplies hazardous substances must ensure the
substance is safe and not a health and safety risk, when
• Used,
• Handled,
• Processed,
• Stored, and/or
• Transported.
• Proper usage.
• Potential risks to health and safety.
• Restrictions/controls to be applied in the usage and transport of the substance.
• Safety precautions to be applied.
• Emergency procedure to be followed in case of overexposure.
• Disposal of drums and waste.
Such information must comply with the provisions of the Hazardous Substances Act.
S A F E T Y A N D T R A I NPage
I N G 67
SOofL107
UTIONS
ANNEXURE 2
Date: _____________________________________________________________________
Description
S A F E T Y A N D T R A I NPage
I N G 68
SOofL107
UTIONS
ANNEXURE 3
I/my employer, hereby agree(s) that the seller has given no guarantee that the articles/equipment or
substances comply with any legislative requirements or any health and safety standards prescribed
for the use of such articles / equipment or substances.
I understand by signing this undertaking that I have/my employer has assumed the responsibility for
the safe/healthy use of the items listed below.
Articles/equipment or substances
1._______________________________________________________________________
2._______________________________________________________________________
3._______________________________________________________________________
4._______________________________________________________________________
5._______________________________________________________________________
6._______________________________________________________________________
7._______________________________________________________________________
8._______________________________________________________________________
9._______________________________________________________________________
10.______________________________________________________________________
________________________________ ______________________________
BUYER’S SIGNATURE SELLER’S SIGNATURE
Company represented Company represented
(if applicable) (if applicable)
(Being duly authorized) (Being duly authorized)
S A F E T Y A N D T R A I NPage
I N G 69
SOofL107
UTIONS
The Minerals Act regulations deal with specific and detailed issues which are recognized as part of
“mining”, whereas the Sections of the Acts deal with more general issues, and thus have more general
wording. There are hundreds of regulations which contain thousands of instructions, and it would be
difficult to provide a summary of each and every one in this manual. Also, not all of the regulations apply to
each and every mine. Some of the regulations deal only with specific machinery and for conditions which
might not exist at the mine.
In addition to the regulations derived from the Minerals Act, the Mine Health and Safety Act also includes
regulations made under that Act.
The following pages contain a list of the regulations. For the sake of convenient differentiation, the
regulations derived from the Minerals Act and the Mine Health and Safety Act are listed separately.
NB: The regulations refer often to “Principal Inspector”. This person is now known as the Principal
Inspector of Mines, except for those regulations dealing with environmental matters - in such instances, the
person is known as the Director: Mineral Development
NB: In terms of Section 103 of the Mine Health and Safety Act, the Occupational Health and Safety Act
applies to any matter about which the MHS Act is silent. The mining environment supervisor / manager /
owner must therefore ensure familiarity with that Act and its regulations as well (see summary below).
Chapter 1: Definitions
Chapter 2: Responsibility
Chapter 3: General Provisions
Chapter 4: Workmen
Chapter 5: Surface Protection, Prevention and Combating of Pollution
Chapter 6: Outlets, Ladder ways and Travelling Ways
Chapter 7: Protection in Workings
Chapter 8: Responsibility in Workings
Chapter 9: Explosives
Chapter 10: Ventilation, Gases and Dust
Chapter 11: Precautions against Fire
S A F E T Y A N D T R A I NPage
I N G 70
SOofL107
UTIONS
S A F E T Y A N D T R A I NPage
I N G 71
SOofL107
UTIONS
Chapter 35: Safety Research
Schedule 1: Permitted Explosives
Schedule 2: Colors and Conventional Signs
Annexure: Declaration of work in National Interest.
S A F E T Y A N D T R A I NPage
I N G 72
SOofL107
UTIONS
Not all offences are dealt with by the mining legislation, and in some instances, the manger may face
liability as provided for in terms of common law. Therefore, a basic understanding of certain legal
concepts is crucial for the manager. The following concepts are those that a manager would be
exposed to on a daily basis.
CRIMINAL LIABILITY
A person who fails to comply with provisions of either a statute or common law duty would be
prosecuted by the State in a court. The person would be known as the accused. If the accused is
convicted, he could be sentenced to a fine or imprisonment, or both.
CIVIL LIABILITY
If the person’s negligence causes loss or injury to another person (third party) that other person could
sue for compensation in a civil court. The third party is then known as the plaintiff and the “negligent”
person becomes the defendant. The court may order that the defendant compensate the plaintiff. This
is the basis of civil liability: no fines or imprisonment is involved. In these civil cases, the State is
generally not involved.
S A F E T Y A N D T R A I NPage
I N G 73
SOofL107
UTIONS
VICARIOUS LIABILITY
This is an important legal concept which the supervisor must be aware of. This principle is sometimes
known as the Master - Servant principle. In summary, this principle involves the following:
• The supervisor must use that power of control to ensure that his subordinates act as reasonable
people.
• If the subordinate commits a wrongdoing, it is because the supervisor failed to exercise his control
as a reasonable supervisor would.
• This failure of exercising control is as serious a wrongdoing as that committed by the subordinate,
and on this basis the supervisor would be punished by being held responsible for the subordinate’s
wrongdoing.
Vicarious Liability applies to both the civil and criminal law spheres. Thus:
• if an employee violates any provision of a statute, or commits a criminal common law offence, the
supervisor could be held criminally liable; and/or
• if a third party suffered loss or damage due to the employee’s negligence, he could lodge a civil
claim against the supervisor.
Generally, the principle of Vicarious Liability, as discussed above, would not apply in a statute, unless
the statute specifically provides that it shall apply. This is the case with MHSA.
Section 2
4) nominating a CEO does not relieve the employer/Board of any liability in terms of this Act
Section 4
4) The appointment under subsection (1) does not relieve the employer of any duty imposed on
employers by this Act or any other law .
Section 3
2) The appointment of a manager does not relieve the employer of any duty imposed on
employers by this Act or any other law.
Section 7
3) The appointment under subsection (2) does not relieve the employer of any duty imposed on
employers by this Act or any other law .
5) The appointment under subsection (4) does not relieve the manager of any duty imposed on
employers by this Act or any other law .
S A F E T Y A N D T R A I NPage
I N G 74
SOofL107
UTIONS
BURDEN OF PROOF
In a criminal case, the State must prove that the accused person is guilty beyond reasonable doubt.
This is a fairly strict test to meet, ( because of the potentially severe consequences to the accused ).
Sometimes however, the State is helped by legal presumptions in its favour, which can be established
merely by submitting documents. It is then up to the accused person (defendant) to prove his
innocence by proving that the documents are not valid. MHSA provides for such presumptions in favour
of the State.
• Unless proven to be false, any person who alleges he is a mine employee is presumed
to be so.
• If it is proved that whatever was written in a logbook, checklist etc. is false, it will be
presumed that the person who normally fills in the documents made the false entry.
In a civil case, the plaintiff must prove his case on a balance of probabilities i.e. he must show that his
version of the matter is more believable than the defendant’s. This test is not as strict as that of a
criminal case.
The purpose of any trial whether civil or criminal is determine whether the person facing the charges
acted as a reasonable person, or whether this person was negligent, and must therefore be found
guilty, or liable as the case may be. For this purpose, the courts would apply the Reasonable Man
Test, which questions whether
It is irrelevant what the “liable” person himself foresaw. The focus is on whether he conducted himself,
as a reasonable person would have in his circumstances. MHSA also provides for this test to be used.
S A F E T Y A N D T R A I NPage
I N G 75
SOofL107
UTIONS
The history and case studies relating to a specific hazard or risk should be consulted as this will
indicate the severity as well as the possible scope thereof.
2. the state of knowledge reasonably available concerning that hazard or risk and of
any means of removing or mitigating that hazard or risk;
This implies that the employer will constantly have to keep abreast of general information regarding
any possible hazard or risk in his specific industry.
Again, the employer should keep abreast of information regarding hazards or risks arising in the
industry within which the company operates and the means generally accepted as solutions thereto.
4. the costs of removing or mitigating the risk in relation to the benefits deriving
therefrom;
This is obviously contentious, as it is difficult to quantify the benefits derived from occupational health
and safety measures. Each situation must be regarded in isolation, taking into account past
experiences with regard to a specific hazard or risk materialising. Ideally, one should keep detailed
records of all past injuries and/or occupational diseases together with a breakdown of costs.
Many accused persons rely on the so-called “norm of industry” argument, when confronted with the
task of satisfying the courts with the Reasonable Man test. This approach has the following inherent
dangers:
• It rests on the assumption that complying with the norm of industry is the same as acting reasonably,
and in compliance with the law.
• The courts focus on, and judge the accused upon his particular circumstances, and not the general
practice/circumstances of the entire industry.
S A F E T Y A N D T R A I NPage
I N G 76
SOofL107
UTIONS
A summons is a formal document instructing the defendant to appear at a certain court on a certain
date. In a criminal trial, failure to do this is treated as contempt of court, which itself is a criminal
offence, and can incur severe penalties. In a civil trial, failure to attend would result in judgement in
default being awarded to the plaintiff. The defendant would automatically be liable to pay the full
compensation sought by the plaintiff.
The charge sheet sets out the crimes or wrongdoings and the accused, or defendant as the case might
be, is asked to plead guilty or not guilty to any, or to all the crimes or wrongdoings listed on the sheet.
These two documents are served together to the defendant.
ADMISSION OF GUILT
The Summons may allow the defendant the option of paying a fine, and thereby avoid a court case.
Although convenient, such a decision must be carefully considered as it carries serious implications.
INDEMNITIES
A company can make a person sign an indemnity whereby the company contracts itself out from being
liable for loss, damage or injury if the signatory may suffer while on the mine premises. Regarding
indemnities the following must be remembered:
1) Indemnities cannot apply to statutory liability i.e. the duties for the health and safety of persons,
which are imposed by the Minerals Act and Regulations, and Mine Health and Safety Act can
never be contracted out of.
2) Indemnities can only limit liability against possible civil actions, and even then only to a limited
extent. The common law provides that one cannot use indemnities to contract out of possible
liability caused by gross negligence or wilful misconduct towards the person (signing the
indemnity).
3) Points (1) and (2) apply, no matter what the wording of the indemnity provides, or whether the
person signed it or not.
S A F E T Y A N D T R A I NPage
I N G 77
SOofL107
UTIONS
A person is appointed in terms of legislation for a purpose. To establish this purpose, one should consider
the wording of the specific section or regulation that creates the appointment. If the wording is not clear, or
very wide, then one should try to establish the intention behind the provision. This can be done by
considering the following:
3. General provisions in the appropriate Act that address situations or impose duties within the
appointee’s ambit of responsibility.
4. Guidelines available in the form of codes of practice, safe work procedures, official directives,
exemptions etc.
It is clear that each appointee has a primary objective to ensure, that as far as is reasonable, people are
healthy and safe at the workplace regardless of whether it is a mine, works or other workplace. Against this
objective, appointees must carry out the duties delegated to them by management.
It stands to reason then, that each statutory appointee must consider the appropriate Act and regulations.
This is, however, not a complete guideline as the Acts make provision for self-regulation to some extent.
The duties imposed by the mine on statutory appointees may not necessarily all be contained in the
specific Act, but nevertheless they remain legal duties. Also, the general body of duties may not be equally
applicable to each individual appointee. It is up to the appointee to assess what is applicable to him.
In addition to the legislation there are various documents or guidelines which the employer and his
appointees must be familiar with in order to be able to carry out their functions and to comply with the
health and safety legislation.
Some of the documents may be required in terms of a specific regulation, while others may be developed
in response to an instruction from the Inspector. The legislation is the minimum standard that would apply
in the workplace. Many of the documents would supplement the legal standard. In this regard they become
crucial, sometimes even legally binding documents themselves.
They serve as practical tools for the implementation of the Acts. In such cases, the relevant provisions of
the Acts have already been interpreted and mechanisms devised to ensure that the duties imposed are
carried out. (E.g. hot work permit systems, lock-out procedures etc.)
S A F E T Y A N D T R A I NPage
I N G 78
SOofL107
UTIONS
“... Means any standard irrespective of whether or not it has the force of law, wich if
applied for the purposes of this act will promote the attainment of an objective of this act.”
“Any person commits an offence who fails to comply with a ... instruction in
terms of this act...”
1. Statutes
The Mine Health and Safety Act has effectively removed the topic of health and safety from the Minerals
Act. Appointees need to understand that the Minerals Act is still in force.
The Mine Health and Safety Act was drafted with the intention of only addressing health and safety, due to
the fact that health and safety previously addressed by the Minerals Act, was not addressed sufficiently.
The Mine Health and Safety Act not only provides for more participation by the workforce regarding health
and safety, but also incorporates various onerous duties upon the employer and management of a mine.
Statutory appointees would be required to have a very good understanding of the basic requirements of the
Act, as well as of the supporting procedures implemented to achieve compliance.
It can safely be assumed that the Act will not be applicable in its entirety. The first task, however, is to
assess whether or not the OHS-Act is applicable to any areas forming part of the “mine”. The OHS-Act will
also be applicable in instances where the Minister declares provisions of the OHS-Act to apply to a mine
(Section 80 (1)).
There may, in addition, be a number of other statutes that govern a specific situation. Generally, an
appointee cannot be expected to be as well-versed on these other statutes as he is on the requirements of
the Act in terms of which he has been appointed. He does, however, need to know of their existence so
that he can assess particular situations.
S A F E T Y A N D T R A I NPage
I N G 79
SOofL107
UTIONS
Sometimes the above-mentioned Acts are silent on a specific subject and in such situations, the common
law would apply. Common law is always applicable and will play a very important role in most appointees'
working lives. As an example, common law will indicate how an appointee should act under the following
circumstances:
3. Codes of Practice
1) The employer may prepare a Code on any issue affecting the health and safety of
employees or other persons.
2) The employer must prepare a Code, if required to do so, by the Chief Inspector.
3) The Code must address the issues outlined by the Chief Inspector.
4) The employer must consult with the Health and Safety Committee when drafting any
Code.
5) The employer must deliver a copy of the Code required by the Chief Inspector to him.
6) The Chief Inspector must review a Code used at the mine if requested to do so by
• it does not comply with a guideline set out by the Chief Inspector or
S A F E T Y A N D T R A I NPage
I N G 80
SOofL107
UTIONS
A common practice among mines is to refer to the legally prescribed Codes (usually those in terms of
the Minerals Act Regulations) as Codes of Practice. Documents developed internally are referred to by
another name.
It must be mentioned that irrespective of what the in-house document is referred to, it serves to set a
standard for enabling the mine to comply with the requirements of the mining legislation. As such, the
document enjoys legal backing. Failure to adhere to the “in-house” document, especially if discovered
by an Inspector, could lead to legal punishment as this would serve to highlight the failure of
compliance quite clearly.
The term “code of practice” is essentially generic. Therefore, a mine is free to develop its own
terminology. Conversely, referring to a document by another name does not detract from the fact that it
is a “code of practice”, and that it is a legally binding document.
A Code of Practice is essentially a document which sets out the standards which must be reached, in a
working place. It provides for the organization of work and the delegation of work responsibilities to
various persons in a workplace area. They can deal with any issue. The setting of standards,
however, has to provide for the following:
There are not many such Codes of Practice. Topics covered include the following:
S A F E T Y A N D T R A I NPage
I N G 81
SOofL107
UTIONS
• The employer may not draft the Code of Practice without consulting with the health and safety
committee. This consultation must address the preparation, implementation and revision of any
Code of Practice.
• The Chief Inspector may require an employer to prepare and implement a Code of Practice on
any matter affecting the health and safety of employees.
• Reference needs to be made to the guidelines for Codes of Practice issued by the Chief
Inspector.
• Consultation between the employer and health and safety committee needs to be entered into,
regarding the preparation and implementation of the Code of Practice.
• The Chief Inspector must review such a Code of Practice if requested to do so by a registered
trade union with members at the mine, the health and safety committee or a health and safety
representative at the mine.
• The employer needs to review the Code of Practice, in the required manner, if instructed to do
so by an inspector of mines.
transport systems
handling of explosives
prevention and fighting of fires
self-rescue procedures
any other safety/health matter required by the Regional Director.
S A F E T Y A N D T R A I NPage
I N G 82
SOofL107
UTIONS
4. Standard Procedures
The mining legislation is not prescriptive on the drafting of written Safe Work Procedures in general.
Procedures, nevertheless, form the framework for most activities at the mine. These procedures may,
or may not, have relevance to legislation. Some procedures, however, that refers to work to be done,
incorporate safety and health aspects required in terms of legislation.
There are various classes of procedures. Some are plant specific, some are common and some have
specific reference to Engineering. Some procedures, wittingly or unwittingly, incorporate Safe Work
Procedures. Safe Work Procedures are the cornerstone of a safety program and form the basis of any
safety-related training.
Once a Code of Practice has set standards for a particular workplace, Standard Procedures [(or Safe
Work Procedures (SWP’s)] become crucial documents. These are very detailed instructions pertaining
to how a particular job function must be carried out with a view to maintaining health and safety.
As a supplement to a Code of Practice, these deal with how something must be done (in order to
achieve the standards laid down by the Code of Practice).
An effective SWP must be a product of Critical Task Analyses (CTI) or Planned Task Observations
(PTO). These would identify the particular changes involved in a particular job function, while the SWP
would be a response to the identified dangers.
A lay-out and matrix should indicate the areas for which appointees are legally responsible, but it must
be remembered that in some instances your duties and responsibilities may exceed the demarcated
boundaries.
• exhibit concern for the protection of persons who are not employees;
S A F E T Y A N D T R A I NPage
I N G 83
SOofL107
UTIONS
2) The employer must consult with the Health and Safety Committee on the drafting of the
policy, and periodic reviews.
7. Official Directives
A Principal Inspector may give orders, suspension and instructions if he believes that any practice or
condition constitutes a danger to the health and/or safety of any person. The Chief Inspector may,
however, confirm or set aside the above but in the meantime it must be adhered to.
It must be stated that section 60 of the Minerals Act has been amended to criminalize contraventions
which are not otherwise declared to be offences. If any condition, instruction, permission or exemption,
granted by the Chief Inspector or Principal Inspector is ignored, the person in question will be guilty of
an offence.
8. Management Directives
Management directives were issued in terms of Section 35 of the Minerals Act which forms part of the
repealed Chapter 5. This Section authorizes the mine manager to lay down requirements for the repair
and supply of any apparatus, machinery or safety-equipment in relation to the safe use or application
thereof.
There is no direct replacement for Section 35: the manager’s discretion has been replaced by the
requirements of Section 21. However, this does not mean that any such directives are automatically
redundant, and to repair or supply equipment contrary to these requirements is still illegal.
It is often said that for every rule there is an exception. In this regard, there may be provisions for rules
which the mine has permission to comply with in a special manner. Furthermore, there may be general
or specific directives that indicate how the specific Act should be interpreted and complied with.
In most cases the Principal Inspector of Mines will issue the permits and permissions. As an example,
in terms of the Minerals Amendment Act, the Principal Inspector of Mines may issue permits for the use
of prescribed machinery but they will be subject to such conditions and requirements, as he may deem
necessary in the interest of safety and health.
The Mine Health and Safety Act now deal with this in Section 53A of the Minerals Act, but previous
instructions issued shall remain in force, until specifically repealed or withdrawn. Appointees must
ensure that they are familiar with the conditions and requirements.
S A F E T Y A N D T R A I NPage
I N G 84
SOofL107
UTIONS
The Minerals Act Regulations prescribes that certain permits shall be applied for and obtained.
Examples of these would include the following:
• boiler permit, chairlift permit, elevator permit, winding plant permit, prospecting and mining permits
Work permits, as such, are not required in terms of the mining legislation, but nevertheless remain
recommended as examples of a strict health and safety standard in place at the mine (in particular,
these should be imposed on contractors). Examples of such “in-house” permits could include:
• hot work permits, roof work permits, work in confined spaces permits
As with permits and permissions, in most cases, the permits and permissions will be issued by the
Principal Inspector of Mines who may also issue conditions to be attached to the granting of the
exemption (Regulation 3.21).
Section 60 of the Minerals Act and Section 91 of the Mine Health and Safety Act make it a criminal
offence to disregard an instruction or condition/exemption where such disregard itself is otherwise not
stated in the Act or Regulations as an offence.
1) (a) The employer must supply the necessary health and safety facilities/equipment
to each employee.
(b) The employer must ensure that the facilities/equipment is in a serviceable
and hygienic condition.
S A F E T Y A N D T R A I NPage
I N G 85
SOofL107
UTIONS
MHSA places a general duty on the employee to look after the PPE issued to him, and not to abuse it.
As an example, safety shoes are only to be used for protecting the feet at the workplace. They must
not, for example, be used for soccer matches over the weekends.
Although an employee is not expected to pay for his equipment, this does not mean he can abuse it,
and then have it replaced free of charge:
• this would be violating his general duty as an employee to look after the clothing / equipment
(Section 22 (c) );
• the employee could be fined by the Inspector for violating Section 22 (c). This fine would
effectively be the value of the re-issued equipment / clothing.
Note: “employee” means contractor employees as well. If their company does not provide them with
the necessary equipment before they come on site, then this duty would fall on the Mine.
Implicit in the above definitions is the fact that a contractor is automatically an “employee” of a mine (as
can be noted, the Mine Health and Safety Act does not even make reference to a contractor as an
organization in its own right).
S A F E T Y A N D T R A I NPage
I N G 86
SOofL107
UTIONS
However, contractors are “employees” and as such have the statutory duty to comply with the
requirements of the mining legislation. A mine must thus have an effective contractor management
system that would inter alia provide for effective training and monitoring of a contractor’s activities on
site, so that this potential exposure is at all times minimized.
For senior personnel, ignorance of the law is no excuse. Employees (i.e. contractors), on the other
hand, would be able to cite this excuse as a defence against their actions if it can be established that
no training was provided to them.
It is thus important to have an effective contractor management system that would ensure such training,
thereby removing the employees’ ability to utilize the defence of ignorance. As employees, they can be
appointed under the mining legislation. This is especially recommended if the contractor is providing
long term service i.e. there is enough time to train the contractor to be as “competent” a person as a
normal mine employee.
TENDER/PROCUREMENT OF CONTRACTORS
There are no legal provisions dealing directly with the recruitment of contractors. There are, however,
two issues to be aware of:
1) The Mine Health and Safety Act applies to “persons”, which would include prospective contractors
who visit a site to examine a project. During such tendering visits, the liability owed by the mine
would be towards contractors as “persons” rather than as “employees”.
2) An approved contractor’s list should be developed by a mine. Criteria for getting on to such a list
should include a good record of quality work and compliance with the legislation. This would be a
reasonable step taken to ensure that the contractor on site is likely to comply with the mining
legislation.
There are various potential legal issues which come into effect at this stage:
1. Health records
S A F E T Y A N D T R A I NPage
I N G 87
SOofL107
UTIONS
2. Training records
TRAINING OF CONTRACTORS
The contractor and his employees must be trained on mine health and safety procedures, permits or
exemptions that apply to their work on the mine in order to make them “competent”. The training of
contractors and employees should include induction to “mine” as well as site specific training.
The contractor must be trained so that he also has a good knowledge of the mining Acts and
regulations, (making them “competent”).
The training to be provided would depend on the service provided by the contractor e.g. a regular
delivery service (approximately ½ hour) might require nothing more than awareness of the hazards of
the roads in the mine.
To help determine training needs, contractors should be categorized. Such a classification could form
part of the approved contractor’s list, discussed above, e.g.:
S A F E T Y A N D T R A I NPage
I N G 88
SOofL107
UTIONS
Minerals Act Regulation 2.10 and Section 10 of the Mine Health and Safety Act clearly provide that
no incompetent person must carry out any task on a mine. This is equally true of contractors and
its/his employees.
In lieu of this, the general training program must provide the contractor employee with all the legal
provisions applicable to his work on site. It would be unreasonable (and possibly unnecessary) to
expect the training program to teach the contractor all the legal provisions.
Similarly, the site induction program must concentrate on, and clearly set out to the contractor
employee all the particular site hazards he may encounter during his period of service, and within the
area of the mine for which he has been mandated to work and move around in.
APPOINTMENT OF CONTRACTORS
Once the contractor and his employees have been trained, and effectively made “competent” (to work in a
healthy and safe manner), the mine should appoint contractor personnel to be responsible for the
supervision of the contractor employees on site. In this regard the common practice is to appoint the head
of a contractor organisation as a Regulation 2.6.1 Site Manager. Similarly, contractor Site Supervisors are
usually appointed in terms of Regulation 2.9.2
The appointees would have to meet the requirements stipulated in their letter of appointment, as read
against a Manager‘s overall responsibility. The appointment would have to be forwarded to the Principal
Inspector, if the regulation by which the appointment is made, also makes it reportable.
If the contractor appointee fails to comply with terms of appointment, then he should be immediately issued
with a written warning. Continuous non-compliance should lead to expulsion. Discipline, however, is a
Labour Relations Act matter, and in this regard it is essential that the mine has a documented procedure
providing for verbal and written warnings and that this is communicated to the contractor employees during
the pre-employment training.
MACHINERY
Section 21 of the Mine Health and Safety Act provides that any article brought to a mine:
• must comply with the provisions of the mining legislation (mainly in the Minerals Act Regulations)
This applies to the machinery and equipment the contractor may wish to bring on site for the work his
employees will perform. To comply with Section 21, the contractor must provide:
S A F E T Y A N D T R A I NPage
I N G 89
SOofL107
UTIONS
• full maintenance records for equipment
• full registers / details for equipment
• full specifications about the machinery or equipment
In addition, the contractor employees must be specifically trained and experienced in the equipment they
may be working with on a mine. Documentation proving this should be forwarded to the mine.
The mine must not allow the contractor to bring any sub-standard equipment on site, nor provide the
contractor with the mine equipment as an alternative. In doing the latter, the mine would be taking on
unnecessary liability i.e. where the contractor employee may injure or kill himself while using such loaned
equipment.
Regarding hazardous substances, full details must be supplied with these, and must cover content
specifications, exposure to the substance and disposal of containers. A good practice would be to insist on
material data sheets following the format set out by Annexure 1 to the General Administrative Regulations
under the Occupational Health and Safety Act (discussed in chapter 4 of this manual).
ACCESS CONTROL
A register containing full details of each contractor employee must be provided to security personnel at all
access points. Contractor employees should ideally have cards with photographs which cannot easily be
“lent out”. Some mines provide a blanket clearance for the card issued by the contractor itself - this serves
to eliminate potential disputes over the cost of such cards.
A common source of disputes between a mine and a contractor is the responsibility for the costs of such
cards. The legislation, does not give any indication in this regard. It merely provides that employees are
not to be forced to pay for health and safety measures i.e. protective clothing and equipment. This
obviously allows the argument that the cards are a matter of security rather than health and safety.
A common problem among mines is unscrupulous contractors who recruit “off the street” in order to ensure
an adequate workforce (where the contractor’s own employees fail to arrive for work). Security measures
must be implemented to prevent such sneaking in of unauthorized persons.
Security persons cannot be expected to check each person on an incoming shift, but a random spot check,
e.g. every fifth person, would normally suffice as a reasonable attempt at preventing such sneaking in.
A mine should appoint a person specifically to manage the recruitment and monitoring of contractors. This
should be a senior person (either Regulation 2.9.2 or 2.6.1 ranking).
A mine must be aware that contractors represent a permanent exposure i.e. it is not enough merely to train
them properly. There must be a system of continual checking of a contractor for compliance,
notwithstanding that contractor personnel have been appointed to carry out the same function.
S A F E T Y A N D T R A I NPage
I N G 90
SOofL107
UTIONS
SUB-CONTRACTORS
From a legal perspective there is no distinction between contractors and sub-contractors. Both are
“employees” of the mine, and as such, equally represent a potential liability exposure for a mine.
The contractor must be compelled to inform a mine of any sub-contractors which it wishes to recruit for
work on the mine.
In general, the Chief Inspector has administrative duties, and as such would not have too much direct
contact with the mines. Exceptions to the above would include the following instances:
S A F E T Y A N D T R A I NPage
I N G 91
SOofL107
UTIONS
The inspector has often been regarded as the MHSA policeman. This is, to some extent, true as he
checks that MHSA “law and order” is maintained at the workplace. He would use all the functions listed
above to help him check a workplace.
The Inspector, however, is also supposed to give the employer and employee assistance in making
sure the workplace is healthy and safe. As will be discussed, respect must be shown to this person.
As regards the power to ask questions, the duty to co-operate must be borne-in mind. So too, however,
must the fact that the Inspector’s purpose (i.e. checking for compliance) is a statutory matter, with
potential statutory penalties. The legal right against self - incrimination must always be remembered in
these circumstances.
As can be seen above, the Inspector is a powerful person. When he gives any instruction, as listed
above, even the employer has to obey this. Very often, the Inspector would give the employer an
instruction which the employer must carry out. If the employer is given such an instruction, he must
obey it, even if he is not happy with the instruction. As will be discussed, disobedience to an Inspector
is a criminal offence in terms of MHSA.
The instruction issued can be verbal or written, but must at least be given to the most senior person on
the mine. A copy would then also have to be given to the employer.
The inspector must allow the employer opportunity to discuss the instruction before it is imposed, but if
the Inspector believes the situation requires immediate action, he can overrule the employer’s right to
discuss the instruction.
S A F E T Y A N D T R A I NPage
I N G 92
SOofL107
UTIONS
If the Inspector believes there is a violation of the requirements of the Act he may
issue an instruction
• to ensure compliance
• setting out what must be done to ensure compliance.
The Inspector must set out a time period in which the corrective action must be carried out, although he
may issue an extension on this time period.
1. When an Inspector visits a mine, the owner / employer and employees working
there must provide the facilities the inspector requires.
2. Any person must answer any question which the inspector may pose, although
the person need not give an answer if this incriminates him.
• Any person must produce any document which the Inspector may require.
Section 52 points out that the employer does not have to answer any question asked by the Inspector
if the answer would incriminate him. This means that if the employer believes the answer would be
admitting to the Inspector that he has disobeyed MHSA he may (politely) refuse to give the answer.
The employer must, therefore, always think carefully, before giving an answer. Where possible, he
should organise to have legal representation present at all times. If the employer is in doubt about
whether to answer, he should rather get the lawyer’s advice first.
S A F E T Y A N D T R A I NPage
I N G 93
SOofL107
UTIONS
Remember, any answer given is used as evidence by the Inspector. This evidence
may further be used as reasons for prosecuting the employer or employer.
The Inspector would also make the employer take an oath to tell the truth. While he is doing this, he
would remind the employer that he “ is not obliged to answer any question which may incriminate
him...”. When the employer has taken this oath, he must never lie to the Inspector, as this is a criminal
offence both in terms of normal law and MHSA.
The danger of an investigation is that the findings of an Inspector are to a large extent based on
presumptions. These presumptions are derived from the documents he has scrutinised.
In view of the above, it is essential that documents containing sensitive information have legal privilege
reserved upon them (as part of the basic legal right against self - incrimination)
The employer must ensure that all employees responsible for completing documentation, such as
formal incident notification reports to the department of Minerals and Energy, understand that only the
most essential non-incriminatory information should be recorded.
Section 57 to 59 - Appeals
1) Any person may lodge an appeal against an instruction of the inspector which affects him. This
person would have to lodge the appeal within 30 days with the Chief Inspector.
2) Any person may lodge an appeal against an instruction of the principal inspector which affects him.
This person would have to lodge the appeal within 30 days with the Chief Inspector
3) The Chief Inspector must, as soon as is possible, uphold the appeal and set aside the instruction,
or uphold, or amend the instruction issued by the inspector.
4) If the person is unhappy with the Chief Inspector’s decision, he must lodge an appeal within 60
days with the Labour Court.
S A F E T Y A N D T R A I NPage
I N G 94
SOofL107
UTIONS
5) While an appeal, either to the chief Inspector or Labour Court, still has to be settled, the instruction
stands, and must be complied with. The only exception to this rule is where the appeal is based on
a fine imposed (Section 55), in which case the fine is suspended, pending the outcome of the
appeal.
If the Inspector has given the employer an instruction which he is not happy about, he could arrange to
appeal against this instruction. The employer should notify his employer.
The employer must clearly set out the reasons for the appeal. These could include what problems the
instruction forces, and what better alternatives there are to the instruction.
The appeal would have to be reported within 30 days, from when the Inspector gave the instruction, to
the Principal Inspector. He could decide to dismiss or uphold the Inspector’s instruction. He would
have to give reasons for his decision.
If the employer is unhappy with this decision, he may appeal within 30 days, from when the Principal
Inspector gave the instruction, to the Chief Inspector. He could decide to dismiss or uphold the
Principal Inspector’s instruction. He would have to give reasons for his decision.
If the employer is unhappy about the Chief Inspector’s decision, he must again contact his Health and
Safety Representative to arrange another appeal, this time to the Labour Court. Again, this appeal
must be lodged within 60 days from when the decision was given.
The Labour Court would review the Chief Inspector’s decision, and the Inspector’s instruction, and
decide whether to dismiss or uphold the instruction.
Important to remember: While an appeal, either to the Principal or Chief Inspector or Labour
Court, still has to be settled, the instruction stands, and must be complied with (Section 59.1)
S A F E T Y A N D T R A I NPage
I N G 95
SOofL107
UTIONS
INVESTIGATIONS
Section 60
Particularly important in the above is that there need not be any actual contravention in place - merely
the suspicion thereof. The union or health and safety representative requesting the investigation merely
has to have reasonable justification for doing so.
The general objective of an investigation is the search for the truth. This truth is intended to be used as
examples to the mines in general i.e. that all may learn from one mine’s misfortune. Nevertheless, an
investigation can lead directly to recommendations of a fine or prosecution, and this permanent threat
obviously discourages full disclosure of the truth.
i) Any person questioned during an investigation must answer to the best of his
ability, unless the answer might incriminate him.
ii) The above, however, would not apply where a confirmation against protection
(Section 63 (3)) has been arranged.
S A F E T Y A N D T R A I NPage
I N G 96
SOofL107
UTIONS
Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 62, above, any person enjoys a basic common law
procedural right against self-incrimination. It is important that this right be borne-in mind and exercised
at all times when dealing with the Inspector.
ABOUT INVESTIGATIONS
An incident investigation is held by the Inspector in order to find out the truth behind an incident. As
previously discussed, sometimes the truth, which an employer knows, can be incriminating, and this
should not be given to the Inspector. Investigations could involve the following:
It must be remembered that the investigation is about a statutory matter, and the information gathered
by the Inspector could be used in determining whether a fine (provided for in terms of Sections 55A to
H) should be imposed, or whether recommendations of prosecution should be submitted to the Attorney
General.
The investigation is usually held in order to determine whether an inquiry must be held. An inquiry, as
will be discussed, is a more serious affair
The Section 63 confirmation is problematic in that it offers protection against criminal liability, but not
against civil liability.
The confirmation provides protection only against prosecution arising from an investigation. It does not
apply in an inquest held in terms of other law for example, following the death of a person (Section 65
(4)).
S A F E T Y A N D T R A I NPage
I N G 97
SOofL107
UTIONS
PROCEDURE AT AN INVESTIGATION
The employer would normally organise to have a lawyer present to represent the employer and his
employees/appointees. It is important that each is clear about what he is going to say so that no one
contradicts the other person. The lawyer would give advice.
The Inspector would give a general introduction, whereby he explains why he is holding the
investigation (i.e. to find out the truth). He would also explain what he is going to do i.e. ask questions,
and prepare a report, which he would send to the Chief Inspector. If the investigation is about a fatality,
he would mention that he will send a report to the Attorney General.
The employer would be called up and asked to take the oath. He would be asked to put his right hand
on the bible while taking the oath. On religious grounds, he could refuse to put his hand on the bible.
The Inspector would then ask him if he promises to tell the truth..
The employer is under oath until the Inspector excuses him, i.e. when there are no more questions to
ask him. When the employer is under oath, he may only speak to the following persons:
• The Inspector
• The person asking him the questions (if this is not the Inspector)
• The lawyer giving him advice
As an example, during a question - and - answer investigation there may be a break for tea before all
questions have been asked of the employer. The employer may not speak about the investigation or
his information during the tea break because he is still under oath.
S A F E T Y A N D T R A I NPage
I N G 98
SOofL107
UTIONS
If the employer has been given this right i.e. he is not under oath, he must remember not to ask
questions that could destroy the game plan set out by the lawyer. Do not try to incriminate the other
person under oath. He will do the same to you.
When there are no more questions, the employer will be excused from his oath. This does not mean he
can leave the investigation immediately. The Inspector must also excuse him. Usually this would only
happen when the investigation is complete.
6) Completion of Investigation
When he has completed his investigation, the Inspector will announce this. He will then read all the
statements he has recorded from the questioning and cross questioning, and ask the parties concerned
if they are satisfied with the contents. Even at this stage, a party, or legal representative is not
precluded from requesting a “last-minute” amendment.
7) Submission of Report
The Inspector must then submit this report both to the Chief inspector and to the Attorney General. The
Chief Inspector would use the report to decide whether an inquiry must be held. The Attorney General
would use the report to decide whether to prosecute anyone, including the employer.
It is important to remember that even where the inspector suggests that prosecution is unlikely to
follow, the Attorney General, or even the Chief Inspector may have different ideas on the matter.
INQUIRIES
Section 65
i) The Chief Inspector must instruct an inspector to hold an inquiry if there has been an
incident resulting in the death of a person at the mine.
iii) An inquiry will not be called for where protection against prosecution has been arranged in
terms of Section 63.
S A F E T Y A N D T R A I NPage
I N G 99
SOofL107
UTIONS
Again, as with investigations, particularly important in the above is that no actual contravention needs to
have taken place. Merely the suspicion thereof is enough. The union or health and safety
representative requesting the investigation merely has to have reasonable justification for doing so.
Unlike an investigation which focuses on the search for the truth behind an incident, an inquiry focuses
on whether any person did not carry out their work responsibility as a reasonable person, and should
therefore be fined or prosecuted.
DUTIES AT AN INQUIRY
• instruct the person to bring any document, or carry out any act for the purposes of this inquiry.
S A F E T Y A N D T R A I NPage
I N G100
S OofL 107
UTIONS
An inquiry could be seen as a “trial” without the formal legal procedure. Nevertheless it must also be
treated with caution, mainly because the findings of an inquiry can lead to prosecution in a magistrate’s
court. Also, many of the rules of court proceedings also apply at inquiries, i.e. lying in court is an
offence.
“discriminate” means dismissing, or doing anything which disadvantages the employee (e.g. ridiculing
him)
Section 83 (2) (b) - “employee” includes an applicant for work who previously worked on another mine.
Violation of this provision is not an offence in terms of this Act, but would be an offence in terms of the
Labour Relations Act (See Section 91(2)).
S A F E T Y A N D T R A I NPage
I N G101
S OofL 107
UTIONS
S A F E T Y A N D T R A I NPage
I N G102
S OofL 107
UTIONS
Section 92
Column 1 Column 2
Section under which convicted Maximum fine and term of imprisonment
2 R1 000 000 or 5 yrs imprisonment
2A R1 000 000 or 5 yrs imprisonment
3 R1 000 000 or 5 yrs imprisonment
5 R1 000 000 or 5 yrs imprisonment
6 R1 000 000 or 5 yrs imprisonment
7(1) R1 000 000 or 5 yrs imprisonment
10 R1 000 000 or 5 yrs imprisonment
11 R1 000 000 or 5 yrs imprisonment
15 R500 000 or five years imprisonment
16 R500 000 or five years imprisonment
21(1), (3) or (4) R500 000 or five years imprisonment
22 R500 000 or five years imprisonment
24 R500 000 or five years imprisonment
52 R200 000 or two years imprisonment
53 R200 000 or two years imprisonment
62 R200 000 or two years imprisonment
66(3) R200 000 or two years imprisonment
70 R200 000 or two years imprisonment
71 R200 000 or two years imprisonment
84 R200 000 or two years imprisonment
85 R200 000 or two years imprisonment
87, 88, 89, 90 R50 000 or six months imprisonment
88 R300 000 or three years imprisonment
S A F E T Y A N D T R A I NPage
I N G103
S OofL 107
UTIONS
• Unless proven to be false, any person who alleges he is a mine employee is presumed
to be so.
• If it is proved that whatever was written in a logbook, checklist etc. is false, it will be
presumed that the person who normally fills in the documents made the false entry.
ADMINISTRATIVE PENALTIES
Section 91
1)B An employer can be fined as per Section 55 if he/it contravenes/fails to comply with
• the standard exceeds the standard set out by the chief inspector’s guidelines;
S A F E T Y A N D T R A I NPage
I N G104
S OofL 107
UTIONS
1. An Inspector who believes the employer has contravened the Act, may recommend to
the Principal Inspector that a fine be imposed.
2. If the Inspector does not recommend such a fine, he must give written reasons for
this, where
• the employer previously failed to comply with any provision of this Act.
3. The inspector must provide a copy of his recommendation to the employer, health
and safety representative and union.
The Principal Inspector may return the matter to the Inspector (where the latter did not
recommend a fine) and instruct him as to what fine must be imposed.
1. The Principal Inspector may refer the matter to an attorney general if it appears that
the employer has committed an offence in terms of this Act or according to common
law.
2. The Principal Inspector must inform the employer of any such referral.
4. The employer may not be prosecuted unless the matter has been referred to the
Attorney General.
5. If the employer is not prosecuted, his statements may not be used against him/it.
S A F E T Y A N D T R A I NPage
I N G105
S OofL 107
UTIONS
1. If the Principal Inspector does not pursue a matter that could be referred to the
Attorney General (for prosecution) he must
3. The Principal Inspector must provide a written record of his decision to the employer
health and safety representative/committee and trade union.
1. In determining whether an employer has failed to comply with any of the Acts
provisions, the Principal Inspector must not be bound to only consider
• whether the employer took what were “reasonable steps” in the circumstances.
• the employer was not personally at fault for any failure to comply with any provision
listed in Section 91(1)B(a) or (b).
S A F E T Y A N D T R A I NPage
I N G106
S OofL 107
UTIONS
• a poor health and safety system or record, and a poor compliance history would
lead to an increase in the fine, and
• a good health and safety system including a policy, and good health and safety or
compliance history would result in a decrease in the fine.
The fines would be paid into a fund set up by the Mine Health and Safety Council, for
health and safety promotion. The Chief Inspector’s annual report (Section 49) must
reflect the financial affairs of the fund.
S A F E T Y A N D T R A I NPage
I N G107
S OofL 107
UTIONS
NOTES :