Seminar Report
Seminar Report
INTRODUCTION
Performance of deep-sub micrometer very large scale integrated (VLSI) circuits is being
increasingly dominated by the interconnects due to increasing wire pitch and increasing
die size. Additionally, heterogeneous integration of different technologies on one single
chip is becoming increasingly desirable, for which planar (2-D) ICs may not be suitable.
The three dimensional (3-D) chip design strategy exploits the vertical dimension to
alleviate the interconnect related problems and to facilitate heterogeneous integration of
technologies to realize system on a chip (SoC) design. By simply dividing a planar chip
into separate blocks, each occupying a separate physical level interconnected by short
and vertical interlayer interconnects (VILICs), significant improvement in performance
and reduction in wire-limited chip area can be achieved. In the 3-Ddesign architecture,
an entire chip is divided into a number of blocks, and each block is placed on a separate
layer of Si that are stacked on top of each other.
LITERATURE SURVEY
1. Kaustav Banerjee, “3D ICs”
A novel chip design for improving deep sub micro meter interconnect performance and
SoC integration” analysed the limitations of the existing interconnect technologies and
design methodologies and presents a novel three- dimensional (3-D) chip design
strategy that exploits the vertical dimension to alleviate the interconnect related
problems and to facilitate heterogeneous integration of technologies to realize a system-
on-a-chip (SoC) design.
3D IC ROADMAP
Like every Semicon West show in the past, where many experts are brought together for
showing the latest and greatest semiconductor manufacturing equipment and bringing
numerous seminar/panel discussions, this Semicon West of 2013 was no different. Two
major issues were discussed, which on the face of it look unrelated, that caught my
attention: Progress in
1.3D - TSV technology, and
2.EUV
Obviously these two issues are very different, but they are quite similar in respect to the
following:
1. As the advanced node progresses to smaller and smaller feature size we are getting
closer to the "end of the road map" or the "end of Moore's law".
Going to EUV does alleviate some of the problems related to the current solution of
double patterning (or quadruple in the future assuming, EUV doesn't come to fruition
soon enough).
2. The big miss of the road map. When one looks at some old road maps from a few
years ago, one can ask how did we, the industry, miss by so much?
This actually reminds me of another miss from a few years ago-the low k inter-metal
dielectric. Fig. 1 shows the low k dielectric roadmap trend of various ITRS published
roadmaps and the prediction in 1999 that by 2004 we would be using k<2 !! Obviously
we know what happened and even today 14 years later it is hard to breakthrough
a k value of 2.5.
Figure 1: 3D IC architecture
The 3-D architecture offers extra flexibility in system design, placement, and
routing.The
3-D integration would significantly alleviate many of the problems outlined in the
previous
section for SoCs fabricated on a single Si layer. Three - dimensional integration can
reduce
the wiring, thereby reducing the capacitance, power dissipation, and chip area and
therefore improve chip performance.
Figure 2 illustrates a TSV construction. The amount of space taken up by vias depends
on the number of vias and their cross-section area. The circuit design determines the
number of vias implemented. The TSV is a vertical electrical connection that passes
completely through a silicon wafer or die to produce multilevel chips with an optimum
combination of cost, functionality, performance, and power consumption. By using TSV
B. 3D IC Bonding topologies
3D-IC with TSV can be categorized as face to face (F2F), face to back (F2B), back to
back (B2B) and back to face (B2F). The four topologies are illustrated in Fig. 3. For
F2B, B2B and B2F topology, TSV is necessary for IC to IC communications. For F2F
topology, TSV is optional For two-layer chip stacks, both integration schemes have some
advantages and disadvantages F2B configuration uses standard process for test, assembly
and packaging, however F2F do not have a standard process [8]. For multi-layer stacks,
F2B has the advantage that after each bonding step, the top device layer is face up so that
the stacking unit process can be repeated multiple times. However, for F2B integration,
the die wafer has to have the final thickness already during stacking, as subsequent
thinning is not possible. In F2F stacking configuration wafer thinnung is not a required.
MANUFACTURUING PROCESSES
1. MONOLITHIC
2. WAFER-TO-WAFER
3. DIE-TO-WAFER
4. DIE-TO-DIE
1. MONOLITHIC
Electronic components and their connections (wiring) are built in layer on single
semiconductor wafer, which is then diced into 3D IC’s.
2. WAFER-TO-WAFER
The wafers must be the same size, but many exotic materials (e.g. III-Vs) are
manufactured on much smaller wafers than CMOS logic or DRAM (typically 300
mm). This complicates heterogeneous integration.
3. DIE-TO-WAFER
One wafer is diced; the simulated dice are aligned and bonded onto die sites
of the second wafer.
4. DIE-TO-DIE
Electronic components are built on multiple die, which are then aligned and
bonded.
Thinning and TSV creation may be done before or after bonding. One
advantage of die-to-die is that each component die can be tested first, so that
one bad die does not ruin an entire stack.
Moreover, each die in the 3D IC can be binned beforehand, so that they can
be mixed and matched to optimize power consumption and performance
PHYSICAL DESIGNS
Physical designs of 3D-IC which needs to be done meticulously to get the optimum
result are:
1) Architecture exploration
2) Floor Planning
3) Placement
4) Routing
5) Layout Editing
PERFORMANCE CHARACTERISTICS
DEPT OF E&CE, PDA 2022-23
Page 13
3D IC’s
1) Timing
2) Energy
ADVANTAGES OF 3D IC’s
circuits.
Space Savings
Finally, the most obvious benefit is space savings as package sizes are smaller.
Vertically stacked 3D integrated circuits can be kept very thin, which is advantageous
compared to spreading circuit blocks out over the expanse of a semiconductor die. As a
Although these packages have many practical and signal integrity advantages, simulation
tools are needed to ensure designs operate as intended. At the circuit level, reliability is
assessed with SPICE simulations, while physical layout and package level simulations
are performed with a field solver application. Advanced packaging should be treated
using a multiphysics approach to assess thermal reliability. Integrated circuit designers
can ideally identify packaging problems before prototyping and make design
modifications early.
DISADVANTAGES OF 3D IC’s
While 3D integrated circuits (3D ICs) offer many advantages over traditional 2D ICs,
there are also some disadvantages that need to be considered. Some of the main
disadvantages of 3D ICs are:
Complexity
3D ICs are more complex than traditional 2D ICs, which makes the design,
manufacturing, and testing processes more challenging. This complexity can also result
in higher costs and longer development times.
Thermal management
Because of their vertical stacking, 3D ICs can generate more heat than 2D ICs, which can
affect their performance and reliability. Managing the heat generated by 3D ICs can be
challenging, requiring advanced cooling techniques such as microfluidic cooling or
thermoelectric cooling.
DEPT OF E&CE, PDA 2022-23
Page 16
3D IC’s
Interconnect reliability
The vertical interconnects in 3D ICs, such as through-silicon vias (TSVs), can be more
prone to defects and failures than the interconnects in 2D ICs. This can be due to issues
such as stress-induced defects or mismatched thermal coefficients of expansion between
the different layers.
Yield
The manufacturing yield of 3D ICs can be lower than that of 2D ICs, meaning that a
higher percentage of the produced chips may be defective or non-functional. This can be
due to the increased complexity of the manufacturing process, the higher density of the
circuits, and the greater likelihood of defects in the vertical interconnects.
Standards: Because 3D ICs are a relatively new technology, there are currently no
established standards for their design, manufacturing, or testing. This lack of standards
can make it more difficult to ensure interoperability between different components and
systems, and can also limit the availability of specialized tools and equipment for 3D IC
development.
APPLICATIONS OF 3D IC’s
Some of the applications of the 3D IC’s are:
FUTURE SCOPE
CONCLUSION
3D-IC is one of the most promising candidates for realizing superior performance
computing including AI, IoT, and so on. Several reliability issues still exist in 3D-ICs
caused by lots of TSVs and micro bumps, thinned wafer/chip, and under-fill materials. In
this paper, the most potent reliability issues such as Cu contamination and
thermomechanical stress were evaluated by new methods. Cu diffusion behaviours were
measured with C-t method and it was indicated that the generation lifetime significantly
decreased with the Cu diffusion into the device region from the sidewall scallop of
TSVs. As for local mechanical stresses, it was found that the mechanical stress
distributions induced around micro bump joining were very complicated and it was
necessary for 3D-ICs to optimize fabrication process and circuit layout including TSVs
The 3 D memory will just the first of a new generation of dense, inexpensive chips that
promise to make digital recording media both cheap and convenient enough to replace
the photographic film and audio tape. We can understand that 3-D ICs are an attractive
chip architecture, that can alleviate the interconnect related problems such as delay and
power dissipation and can also facilitate integration of heterogeneous technologies in one
chip. The multilayer chip building technology opens up a whole new world of design like
a city skyline transformed by skyscrapers, the world of chips may never look at the same
again.
BIBILOGRAPHY
Kaustav banerjee, shukri j souri, pawan kapur and krishna c saraswath, “3-d ics: a
novel chip design for improving deep sub micrometer interconnect performance
and soc integration” at page 602. 2. Electronics today june 2002.
Gael Pillonnet, Nicolas Jeannioe, Pascal Vivee, “3D ICs: An Opportunity for
Fully
Integrated,Dense and Efficient Power Supplies” , IEEE 2015 International
3D
Systems Integration Conference.
Kaustav Banerjee, Shukri J. Souri, Pawan Kapur and Krishna C. Saraswat, “3-D
Heterogeneous ICs: A Technology for the Next Decade and Beyond”, 5th IEEE
Workshop on Signal Propagation On Interconnects, Venice, Italy May, 13-16,
2001.