Scribd
Upload
39 views4 pages

TM471B-Deliverable-and-Presentation-Marking sheet-SP

This document outlines the components and criteria for evaluating a student project presentation and deliverable. It includes sections for the student information, presentation components and sub-components, total presentation mark, deliverable criteria, total deliverable mark, bonus marks, committee members, and signature. The key information provided is the breakdown of marks available and awarded for the quality of the presentation, communication skills, and deliverable based on criteria like functionality, interface, interactivity, and code quality.

Uploaded by

Merna Sami
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
39 views4 pages

TM471B-Deliverable-and-Presentation-Marking sheet-SP

This document outlines the components and criteria for evaluating a student project presentation and deliverable. It includes sections for the student information, presentation components and sub-components, total presentation mark, deliverable criteria, total deliverable mark, bonus marks, committee members, and signature. The key information provided is the breakdown of marks available and awarded for the quality of the presentation, communication skills, and deliverable based on criteria like functionality, interface, interactivity, and code quality.

Uploaded by

Merna Sami
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 4

Branch Name: Kuwait

TM471 - Project Deliberation (SP)


Student ID Student Name

Section Project title

Supervisor Name

Date of presentation

Time of presentation

Presentation
Main Components Sub-Components

Quality of Presentation and Clarifications of project


Demonstration achievements
Presentation layout
Quality of the outcome, quality and
level of the research results
Feedback on questions, confidence
and interactivity
Communication Skills Organization and Preparation
Presentation skills
Adhere to the time limit specified
Total Mark of the presentation

Deliverable
Criteria

1. Does the system correctly perform its intended function?


2. Quality of the deliverable:
a- User friendly interface/clear simulation results
b- Interactivity features/versatility of analysis parameters
c- Response time for the system/complexity in time and space
of the used mode

3. Feedback on questions and confidence interactivity:


a- Knowledge of the functionality of the main components
b- Degree of self-confidence in providing proper answers
c- Showing sufficient understanding of the question's inquiries

4. Code/Simulation:
a- Clarity and Style
b- Modular design
c- Proper commenting on procedures and functions

Total Mark (out of 20)


5. Bonus for distinguished projects
Final mark for Deliverable = Total (out of 25) + extra marks:

Committee Members
Name
Member1
Member2
Member3
ration (SP)

Marks Available Marks Awarded

3 3

3 3
4 4

4 4
2 2
2 2
2 2
20 20
Total out of 10: 10

Marks Available Marks Awarded

6 6
6 6

8 8

5 5

25 25
2 extra marks 0
25

Signature

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy