Scribd
Upload
47 views2 pages

Form 901.7

The document is a checklist used to verify engineering designs for pipe repair clamps. It contains yes/no questions to ensure designs meet requirements for client requests, materials selection, calculations, drawings, and other factors. The checklist was completed for a design with client Exxon Mobil for a 377 psi, 310 degree F steam service. Some items like welding and special coatings were not applicable. The design was verified as meeting the checklist criteria.

Uploaded by

ariya
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
47 views2 pages

Form 901.7

The document is a checklist used to verify engineering designs for pipe repair clamps. It contains yes/no questions to ensure designs meet requirements for client requests, materials selection, calculations, drawings, and other factors. The checklist was completed for a design with client Exxon Mobil for a 377 psi, 310 degree F steam service. Some items like welding and special coatings were not applicable. The design was verified as meeting the checklist criteria.

Uploaded by

ariya
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

FORM 901.

7
Engineering Procedure Supplement Rev: 3
A Corporate Page 1 of 1
LRS Design Verification Checklist

Engineering/JSS Number: 4319409 Rev.: 0 District: 1430 Designer: AK

Yes, Data ([EHO] to be completed at job intake and filed with the project)
No,
N/A
Client: Exxon Mobil
Service: Steam
Design Pressure: 377
Design Temperature: 310
Client Requests/Requirements:
Y Are all required DS Sheets and supporting sketches turned in?
Y Are selected materials compatible with service and temperature?
Y Has material availability and lead time been considered?
N Is the service critical or needs special requirements? (Material, PWHT, SCC, etc.)
Y Is strongbacking required as per restraint Policy LRS-3902/3903?
Y Does the data show BPTC?
Y Are clock points correctly labelled?
Is the job Nuclear? If yes, please review Nuclear Guide Lines, tubing material, do not paint, NACL required, QC
N inspection required, Coversheet, drawings, and MSS noted
Data Intake by: IS Date: 9/20/21

Drawings/Models
Cover Sheet Y Is the layout drawn correctly, with mass = 0?
Y Is the Client correct? Y Have obstructions been considered?
Y Can the clamp be installed?
Y Is the Engineering/JSS Number correct?
Y
N Is 3rd-party verification required (e.g. Lloyds)? Y
Do the bores match BPTC?
Y Are offset bores and ovality considered and detailed?
Material Data Sheet/BOM Y Is design appropriate for the repair and for ease of
Y Are all components listed and to the correct manufacture?
specification? (Injection ports, half couples, lifting Y Do the components fit and work together?
lugs, Etc.) N/A Do the dimensions of the grooves/teeth match
Y Are MTRs and COCs Required? model?
Y [WHO] Are the correct boxes checked? N/A
N/A Is the tubing/packing compatible with the service?
N Is welding required? If yes, review the following:
symbol, size, requirements, P#’s
Calculations N/A Are enough injection ports added, is spacing correct?
Y Are all references correct? N/A Has enough clearance been left around studs/nuts for
Y Is the code year correct? tools, incl. allowance for welds?
Y Are all required calculations included? (Endplate, Y Are the studs and holes dimensioned, and are bores
Bolting, Thrust/Separation, P-max, Void, etc.) correct for stud size?
Y Do calculation inputs match the drawing Y Are stud torque values included where required?
dimensions? What is the weight of each component/assembly to
Y Do the customer requests adhere to code? If not be lifted? 100.9 Is lifting gear needed? Y
was this discussed with an SME & Customer? N Have enough lifting lugs/eyes been added, and have
N
these been included in MSS/BOM?
Y Are calculation outputs within allowable limits? Y Are drawings notes correct?
Is the void volume correct?
N/A Is non-standard/special coating required and
Engineering Locations: detailed?
WHO – Western Hemisphere

EHO – Eastern Hemisphere


FORM 901.7
Engineering Procedure Supplement Rev: 3
A Corporate Page 2 of 1
LRS Design Verification Checklist

Meridian Additional Requirements for WHO


N Is minimum metadata populated? Drawings/Models
N/A Is ECN document completed correctly? Y Are tubing/packing grooves/crunch teeth properly
N Are project documents approved for manufacture dimensioned with material called out?
(rev A/B/C etc.)? Y Is there enough cavity wall?
2 How many studs are required?
Size?
Verification Comments: What is the spacing between bolts?
10.125

Additional Requirements for EHO


Drawing Title Block
N/A
N/A Is drawing number correct?
N/A Is Client correct (incl. spelling)
N/A Is Designer/Verifier correct
N/A Is ECN number correct
Meridian
N/A Is Traveler created and up to date?
N/A Is burnout/DXF profile created and up to date?
Miscellaneous
N/A Is compound/sealant selection appropriate?
N/A Is Special Equipment List (SEL) completed?
N/A Is estimated hours in Teamworks correct
(Intake/Design/Verification)? Hours:

All the above checked and Date:


verified (Verifier): GS 9/22/21
Feedback to Designer Minor (e.g. missing dimensions, Major (change for code compliance)
was: notes, recommendations) add notes in space above
Feedback received Date:
(Designer):

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy