8CN0 02 Pef 20180815
8CN0 02 Pef 20180815
June 2018
Edexcel and BTEC qualifications come from Pearson, the UK’s largest awarding body. We provide a
wide range of qualifications including academic, vocational, occupational and specific programmes
for employers. For further information visit our qualifications websites at www.edexcel.com or
www.btec.co.uk.
Alternatively, you can get in touch with us using the details on our contact us page at
www.edexcel.com/contactus.
ResultsPlus is Pearson’s free online service giving instant and detailed analysis of your students’
exam results.
Understand how your students’ performance compares with class and national averages.
Identify potential topics, skills and types of question where students may need to develop their
learning further.
Pearson aspires to be the world’s leading learning company. Our aim is to help everyone progress
in their lives through education. We believe in every kind of learning, for all kinds of people,
wherever they are in the world. We’ve been involved in education for over 150 years, and by
working across 70 countries, in 100 languages, we have built an international reputation for our
commitment to high standards and raising achievement through innovation in education. Find out
more about how we can help you and your students at: www.pearson.com/uk.
June 2018
Publications Code 8CN0_02_1806_ER
In Section A Question 1, candidates are required to translate a short piece of text from English into
Chinese. Candidates are assessed for the ability to produce an accurate and appropriate
translation.Section B is focused on written response to literary works and consists of Question 2
and Question 3. Section C is focused on written response to cinematic (film) works and consists of
Question 4 and Question 5. Each question requires the candidates to write an essay of between
225 — 300 Chinese characters in response to an essay topic which is referenced to one of the
literary or cinematic works as prescribed in Appendix 2 of the Specification. Guidance is provided in
the form of 3 bullet points which lay out suggestions for the content of the essay.
Candidates are required to choose to answer 1 question only from either Section B or Section C.
The resulting essay is assessed for the quality of written Chinese through the accuracy and
articulate application of a range of complex grammatical structures and vocabulary as well as the
ability of the candidate to respond critically to a literary or cinematic work through the construction
of a cogent argument which is well-justified and consistently evidenced by reference to the work.
Whole responses are marked regardless of length.
The lexis was relatively straightforward. Although most candidates did not struggle with vocabulary,
some basic phrases seemed to present difficulties for a few candidates. These included ''愿意“,
”帮助“ and “所以”.
Character formation was usually satisfactory, although certain characters proved to be problematic,
for example “候“,”帮“,”忙“etc.
A range of features from grammar lists were tested. These rangedfrom the relatively
straightforward“和“ , “都”, “也”, to the more sophisticated conjunctions, such as “但是“, ”因为“,
”如果……就……”. As a result, candidates scored across the whole mark range.
Overall, the performance was encouraging and most candidates showed that they could transfer
the meaning of a piece of English with acceptable accuracy. It is necessary to draw attention to
certain details as being essential if candidates are to score for every language element.
The division of marks enabled most candidates to score at some point. Marks were awarded
most often for translating '人们', “但是 '' , '和孩子吃饭' and ”因为”.
Marks were most often lost for language elements 6, 9 18 and 20. Language elements 6, 18 and
20 presented a challenge to candidates because of the harder characters or vocabulary.
Language element 9 was more difficult because of the Chinese word order.
Many candidates had difficulty with the last sentence as they misunderstood the meaning of the
English text.
This translation was acceptable and was awarded 14 out of 20 available marks.
This response achieved 27 out of 40. 12 marks for Critical response and 15 marks for Accuracy and
range of grammatical structures and vocabulary.
This response achieved 15 out of 40. 6 marks for Critical response and 9 marks for Accuracy and a
range of grammatical structures and vocabulary.
This response achieved 33 out of 40. 16 marks for Critical Response and 17 marks for Accuracy and
a range of grammatical structures and vocabulary.
This response is a good example of an essay with a reasonably good structure: points follow
logically from one to another with a thread running through the work.
Question 1 comprises twenty separate scoring units, candidates should put down every element
they can. Candidates should ensure they do not lose credit because of a careless lack of attention
to detail.
In order to write the essay more fully, candidates should refer closely to the rubric and the bullet
points. Candidates should proofread their essays carefully and ensure that they have addressed
all the bullet points.
Essays need to show candidates’ ability to respond critically to the text or to present and justify
their points of view. Essays shouldn’t be descriptive. It is recommended that candidates add their
own analysis and make sure that it is adequate and displays the suitable depth at this level.
Candidates are reminded to use good essay writing techniques - points should follow logically
from one to another with a thread running through the work.
When deciding on works to be studied for Sections B and C, candidates and teachers should
carefully consider whether candidates are able to access enough materials to cover all potential
questions independently.
http://www.edexcel.com/iwantto/Pages/grade-boundaries.aspx