0% found this document useful (0 votes)
198 views7 pages

VALIDATION-LETTER-AND-VALIDATION-SHEET Edited

This document is a feasibility study proposal on abaca crocheting submitted by Geomar Avila, Hazel Blasquez, and Justin Cabadonga to their professor for approval. It includes a letter requesting permission to conduct surveys on campus and letters validating their questionnaire sent to their research adviser and another professor. The proposal examines the feasibility of starting an abaca crocheting business and seeks input from experts to improve their questionnaire before collecting data.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
198 views7 pages

VALIDATION-LETTER-AND-VALIDATION-SHEET Edited

This document is a feasibility study proposal on abaca crocheting submitted by Geomar Avila, Hazel Blasquez, and Justin Cabadonga to their professor for approval. It includes a letter requesting permission to conduct surveys on campus and letters validating their questionnaire sent to their research adviser and another professor. The proposal examines the feasibility of starting an abaca crocheting business and seeks input from experts to improve their questionnaire before collecting data.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 7

Republic of the Philippines

North Eastern Mindanao State University


Formerly Surigao del Sur State University
Rosario, Tandag City, Surigao del Sur 8300
Telefax No. 086-214-4221
Website: www.sdssu.edu.ph
COLLEGE OF BUSINESS AND MANAGEMENT

A FEASIBILITY STUDY ON ABACA CROCHETING

A Feasibility Study
Presented to
The Faculty of College of Business and Management
North Eastern Mindanao State University-Main Campus
Tandag City

As a requirement for the Degree of


Bachelor of Science in Business Administration
Major in Financial Management

Avila, Geomar
Blasquez, Hazel E.
Cabadonga, Justin M.

November 2022
Republic of the Philippines
North Eastern Mindanao State University
Formerly Surigao del Sur State University
Rosario, Tandag City, Surigao del Sur 8300
Telefax No. 086-214-4221
Website: www.sdssu.edu.ph
COLLEGE OF BUSINESS AND MANAGEMENT

Letter of Approval to the Department Chair of Business Management

December 16, 2022

DR. ROVILYN K. DAGONDON


CBM Department Chair
Department of Business Management
North Eastern Mindanao State University
Rosario, Tandag City

Ma’am:

Good day!

As a partial requirement for the degree of Bachelor of Science in Business


Administration major in Financial Management, the undersigned fourth year
students of North Eastern Mindanao State University - Tandag Campus are
currently conducting a feasibility study entitled “ABACA CROCHETING”.

In line with this, may we asked your good office to give us permission to
conduct our study inside the university through face-to-face. It is rest assured
that health protocols will be observed and followed.

Your favourable in this request will be much appreciated.

Respectfully yours,

Geomar L. Avila Hazel E. Blasquez Justin M. Cabadonga


Researcher Researcher Researcher

Noted by: Recommended by:

JULY BUNIEL, PhD JENNILYN C. DOLORIEL, MBA


Research Adviser BSBA Program Coordinator

Approved by:

ROVILYN K. DAGONDON, DBA, DM


Department Chair
Republic of the Philippines
North Eastern Mindanao State University
Formerly Surigao del Sur State University
Rosario, Tandag City, Surigao del Sur 8300
Telefax No. 086-214-4221
Website: www.sdssu.edu.ph
COLLEGE OF BUSINESS AND MANAGEMENT

As a partial requirement for the Degree of Bachelor of Science in Business


Administration, major in Financial Management, we are the fourth year students
of this university are officially enrolled in Efm2 (Feasibility Study), 1 st Semester,
A.Y. 2022-2023. They are currently conducting a feasibility study entitled: “A
Feasibility Study on Abaca Crocheting”.

With that, may we request you to validate our questionnaire for the said
study. We believe that your expertise on this matter will substantiate the content
of our questionnaire.

Your comments and suggestion will be greatly valued. 

Respectfully yours,

Avila, Geomar Blasquez, Hazel E.


Student Researcher Student Researcher

Cabadonga, Justin M.
Student Researcher
Republic of the Philippines
North Eastern Mindanao State University
Formerly Surigao del Sur State University
Rosario, Tandag City, Surigao del Sur 8300
Telefax No. 086-214-4221
Website: www.sdssu.edu.ph
COLLEGE OF BUSINESS AND MANAGEMENT

December 13, 2022

Floresito D. Calub, DBA


Assistant Professor IV
Department of Business Management
College of Business and Management
NEMSU – Main Campus

Sir:

Greetings of peace.

As a partial requirement for the Degree of Bachelor of Science in Business


Administration, major in Financial Management, we are the fourth year students
of this university are officially enrolled in Efm2 (Feasibility Study), 1 st Semester,
A.Y. 2022-2023. They are currently conducting a feasibility study entitled: “A
Feasibility Study on Abaca Crocheting”.

With that, may we request you to validate our questionnaire for the said
study. We believe that your expertise on this matter will substantiate the content
of our questionnaire.

Your comments and suggestion will be greatly valued. 

Respectfully yours,

Avila, Geomar Blasquez, Hazel E.


Student Researcher Student Researcher

Cabadonga, Justin M.
Student Researcher
Republic of the Philippines
North Eastern Mindanao State University
Formerly Surigao del Sur State University
Rosario, Tandag City, Surigao del Sur 8300
Telefax No. 086-214-4221
Website: www.sdssu.edu.ph
COLLEGE OF BUSINESS AND MANAGEMENT

VALIDATION FORM
Name of Evaluator : FLORESITO D. CALUB, DBA
Degree : _DOCTOR IN BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
Position : ASSISTANT PROFESSOR IV
Number of Years in Teaching/Service : _________________

To the Evaluator: Please check the appropriate box


for your rating: Point Equivalent:
5 -Excellent
4 -Very Good
3 -Good
2 -Fair
1 -Poor

INDICATORS 5 4 3 2 1
1.) Clarity of Direction and items
The vocabulary level, language structure and concept of the questions suit the
level of respondents. The test direction and items are written in a clear and
understandable manner.
2.) Presentation/Organizations items
The items are organized in logical manner.
3.) Suitability of items
The items appropriately represent the substance of the research. The questions
are designed to determine the conditions, knowledge, skills and attitudes that are
supposed to be measured.
4.) Adequateness of items per Category
The items represent the coverage of the research adequately. The number of
questions per category is representative enough of all questions needed for the
research.
5.) Attainment of the Purpose
The instrument as a whole fulfills the objectives for which it was constructed.
6.) Objectivity
In each item question, there is only one specific answer to measure one behavior
and no aspect of the questionnaire suggests bias on the part of the research.
7.) Scale and Evaluation in Rating System
The scale adopted is appropriate for the items.

Remarks:

FLORESITO D. CALUB, DBA


Signature over Printed Name
VALIDATION FORM
Name of Evaluator : FLORESITO D. CALUB, DBA
Republic of the Philippines
North Eastern Mindanao State University
Formerly Surigao del Sur State University
Rosario, Tandag City, Surigao del Sur 8300
Telefax No. 086-214-4221
Website: www.sdssu.edu.ph
COLLEGE OF BUSINESS AND MANAGEMENT

Degree : _DOCTOR IN BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION


Position : ASSISTANT PROFESSOR IV
Number of Years in Teaching/Service : _________________

To the Evaluator: Please check the appropriate box


for your rating: Point Equivalent:
5 -Excellent
4 -Very Good
3 -Good
2 -Fair
1 -Poor

INDICATORS 5 4 3 2 1
1.) Clarity of Direction and items
The vocabulary level, language structure and concept of the questions suit the
level of respondents. The test direction and items are written in a clear and
understandable manner.
2.) Presentation/Organizations items
The items are organized in logical manner.
3.) Suitability of items
The items appropriately represent the substance of the research. The questions
are designed to determine the conditions, knowledge, skills and attitudes that are
supposed to be measured.
4.) Adequateness of items per Category
The items represent the coverage of the research adequately. The number of
questions per category is representative enough of all questions needed for the
research.
5.) Attainment of the Purpose
The instrument as a whole fulfills the objectives for which it was constructed.
6.) Objectivity
In each item question, there is only one specific answer to measure one behavior
and no aspect of the questionnaire suggests bias on the part of the research.
7.) Scale and Evaluation in Rating System
The scale adopted is appropriate for the items.

Remarks:

FLORESITO D. CALUB, DBA


Signature over Printed Name
VALIDATION FORM
Name of Evaluator : FLORESITO D. CALUB, DBA
Degree : _DOCTOR IN BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
Position : ASSISTANT PROFESSOR IV
Number of Years in Teaching/Service : _________________
Republic of the Philippines
North Eastern Mindanao State University
Formerly Surigao del Sur State University
Rosario, Tandag City, Surigao del Sur 8300
Telefax No. 086-214-4221
Website: www.sdssu.edu.ph
COLLEGE OF BUSINESS AND MANAGEMENT

To the Evaluator: Please check the appropriate box


for your rating: Point Equivalent:
5 -Excellent
4 -Very Good
3 -Good
2 -Fair
1 -Poor

INDICATORS 5 4 3 2 1
1.) Clarity of Direction and items
The vocabulary level, language structure and concept of the questions suit the
level of respondents. The test direction and items are written in a clear and
understandable manner.
2.) Presentation/Organizations items
The items are organized in logical manner.
3.) Suitability of items
The items appropriately represent the substance of the research. The questions
are designed to determine the conditions, knowledge, skills and attitudes that are
supposed to be measured.
4.) Adequateness of items per Category
The items represent the coverage of the research adequately. The number of
questions per category is representative enough of all questions needed for the
research.
5.) Attainment of the Purpose
The instrument as a whole fulfills the objectives for which it was constructed.
6.) Objectivity
In each item question, there is only one specific answer to measure one behavior
and no aspect of the questionnaire suggests bias on the part of the research.
7.) Scale and Evaluation in Rating System
The scale adopted is appropriate for the items.

Remarks:

FLORESITO D. CALUB, DBA


Signature over Printed Name

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy