Inventory MGT Book Slides Gitman
Inventory MGT Book Slides Gitman
ABC System
ABC inventory system A firm using the ABC inventory system divides its inventory into three groups: A,
Inventory management tech- B, and C. The A group includes those items with the largest dollar investment.
nique that divides inventory into Typically, this group consists of 20% of the firm’s inventory items but 80% of its
three groups—A, B, and C, in investment in inventory. The B group consists of items that account for the next
descending order of impor-
largest investment in inventory. The C group comprises a large number of items
tance and level of monitoring—
on the basis of the dollar that require a relatively small investment.
investment in each. The inventory group of each item determines the item’s level of monitoring.
The A group items receive the most intense monitoring because of the high dollar
investment. Typically, managers track A group items on a perpetual inventory
system that allows daily verification of each item’s inventory level. B group items
are frequently controlled through periodic, perhaps weekly, checking of their lev-
els. Managers monitor C group items with unsophisticated techniques, such as
two-bin method
the two-bin method. With the two-bin method, the item is stored in two bins. As
Unsophisticated inventory-
an item is needed, inventory is removed from the first bin. When that bin is
monitoring technique that is
typically applied to C group empty, an order is placed to refill the first bin while inventory is drawn from the
items and involves reordering second bin. The second bin is used until empty, and so on.
inventory when one of two bins The large dollar investment in A and B group items suggests the need for a
is empty. better method of inventory management than the ABC system. The EOQ model,
economic order quantity discussed next, is an appropriate model for managing A and B group items.
(EOQ) model
Inventory management tech- Economic Order Quantity (EOQ) Model
nique for determining an item’s
optimal order size, which is the
One technique for determining the optimal order size for inventory items is the
size that minimizes the total of economic order quantity (EOQ) model. The EOQ model considers various costs
its order costs and carrying of inventory and then determines what order size minimizes total inventory cost.
costs. The EOQ model works by trading off two categories of inventory costs:
order costs order costs and carrying costs. Order costs include the fixed clerical costs of plac-
The fixed clerical costs of plac- ing and receiving orders: the cost of writing a purchase order, of processing the
ing and receiving an inventory resulting paperwork, and of receiving an order and checking it against the
order. invoice. The more orders a firm places, the higher are order costs. In the EOQ
carrying costs model, we measure order costs in dollars per order. Carrying costs are the vari-
The variable costs per unit of able costs per unit of holding an item of inventory for a specific period of time.
holding an item in inventory for Carrying costs include storage costs, insurance costs, the costs of deterioration
a specific period of time. and obsolescence, and the opportunity cost of investing funds in inventory rather
than in other assets that earn a return. A firm can push carrying costs down by
placing many small orders rather than a few large ones. In the EOQ model, we
measure carrying costs in dollars per unit per period.
Order costs decrease as the size of the order increases and the number of
orders falls. Carrying costs, however, increase with increases in the order size.
The EOQ model analyzes the tradeoff between order costs and carrying costs to
determine the order quantity that minimizes the total inventory cost.
The carrying cost is the cost of carrying a unit of inventory per period (C) multi-
plied by the firm’s average inventory. The average inventory is Q , 2 because
EOQ model assumes that a firm’s inventory is drawn down at a steady rate
between orders. That is, the average inventory is the order quantity (Q) divided
by 2. Thus, carrying cost equals
total cost of inventory The firm’s total cost of inventory equals the sum of the order cost and the
The sum of order costs and car- carrying cost. Thus, the total cost function is
rying costs of inventory.
Because the EOQ is the order quantity that minimizes the total cost function, we
must solve the total cost function for the EOQ.3 The resulting equation is
2 * S * O
EOQ = (15.7)
A C
3. In this simple model, the EOQ occurs at the point where the order cost 3 O * (S , Q)4 just equals the carrying
cost 3 C * (Q , 2)4 . To demonstrate, we set the two costs equal and solve for Q:
3 O * (S , Q)4 = 3 C * (Q , 2)4
Then cross-multiplying, we get
2 * O * S = C * Q2
Dividing both sides by C, we get
Q 2 = (2 * O * S) , C
so
Q = 2(2 * O * S) , C
Remember that the EOQ as defined by Equation 15.7 is simply the size of
the order that the firm should place to minimize costs. Think intuitively about
what Equation 15.7 says regarding the optimal order quantity. If the rate at
which the firm uses inventory, S, increases, then the order quantity should be
higher. That makes sense because if a firm uses inventory very rapidly and if it
places small orders, it will have to place many of them and order costs will be
very high. Similarly, Equation 15.7 says that if the carrying cost per unit (C) is
high, the order quantity should be smaller. That makes sense, too, because if
inventory is costly to hold (perhaps because it spoils or because its value
declines rapidly), a firm does not want to hold a large inventory balance.
2 * 250 * $10
EOQ = = 50
A $2
The von Dammes should purchase 50 gallons of paint each time they visit the store.
Given their annual use of 250 gallons, they will make 5 trips to the store per year.
Reorder Point Once the firm has determined its economic order quantity, it
reorder point must determine when to place an order. The reorder point reflects the number of
The point at which to reorder days of lead time the firm needs to place and receive an order and the firm’s daily
inventory, expressed as days of usage of the inventory item. Assuming that the firm uses inventory at a constant
lead time * daily usage. rate, the formula for the reorder point is
For example, if a firm knows it takes 3 days to place and receive an order
and if it uses 15 units per day of the inventory item, the reorder point is 45 units
of inventory (3 days * 15 units/day). Thus, as soon as the item’s inventory level
falls to the reorder point (45 units, in this case), the firm places an order for the
safety stock
item’s EOQ. If the estimates of lead time and usage are correct, the order will
Extra inventory that is held to arrive exactly as the inventory level reaches zero. However, lead times and usage
prevent stockouts of important rates are not precise, so most firms hold safety stock (extra inventory) to prevent
items. stockouts of important items.
2 * 1,100 * $150
EOQ = ≈ 41 units
A $200
The reorder point for MAX depends on the number of days MAX oper-
ates per year. Assuming that MAX operates 250 days per year and uses 1,100
units of this item, its daily usage is 4.4 units (1,100 , 250). If its lead time is
2 days and MAX wants to maintain a safety stock of 4 units, the reorder
point for this item is 3 (2 * 4.4) + 4 4 , or 12.8 units. However, orders are
made only in whole units, so MAX places the order when the inventory falls
to 13 units.
The firm’s goal for inventory is to turn it over as quickly as possible without
stockouts. Inventory turnover is best calculated by dividing cost of goods sold by
average inventory. The EOQ model determines the optimal order size and, indi-
rectly, through the assumption of constant usage, the average inventory. Thus,
the EOQ model determines the firm’s optimal inventory turnover rate, given the
firm’s specific costs of inventory.
Source: https://www.hospitalitynet.org/news/4082782.html
materials requirement
planning (MRP) system Computerized Systems for Resource Control
Inventory management tech- Today, a number of systems are available for controlling inventory and other
nique that applies EOQ con- resources. One of the most basic is the materials requirement planning (MRP)
cepts and uses a computer to system. Firms use that system to determine what materials to order and when
compare production needs to
to order them. MRP applies EOQ concepts to determine how much to order.
available inventory balances
and determine when orders Using a computer, MRP simulates each product’s bill of materials, inventory
should be placed for various status, and manufacturing process. The bill of materials is simply a list of all
items on a product’s bill of parts and materials that go into making the finished product. For a given pro-
materials. duction plan, the computer simulates material requirements by comparing pro-
manufacturing resource duction needs to available inventory balances. On the basis of the time it takes
planning II (MRP II) for a product that is in process to move through the various production stages
An extension of MRP that uses a and the lead time to get materials, the MRP system determines when orders
sophisticated computerized sys- should be placed for various items on the bill of materials. The objective of this
tem to integrate data from system is to lower the firm’s inventory investment without impairing produc-
numerous areas such as finance,
tion. If the firm’s pretax cost of capital for investments of equal risk is 10%,
accounting, marketing, engi-
neering, and manufacturing and
every dollar of investment released from inventory will increase before-tax
generate production plans as profits by $0.10.
well as numerous financial and An extension of MRP is manufacturing resource planning II (MRP II), which
management reports. integrates data from numerous areas such as finance, accounting, marketing,
enterprise resource engineering, and manufacturing, using a sophisticated computer system. This
planning (ERP) system generates production plans as well as numerous financial and manage-
A computerized system that ment reports. In essence, it models the firm’s processes so that the firm can assess
electronically integrates external and monitor the effects of changes in one area of operations on other areas. For
information about the firm’s sup- example, the MRP II system would allow the firm to determine the effect of an
pliers and customers with the increase in labor costs on sales and profits.
firm’s departmental data so that
Whereas MRP and MRP II tend to focus on internal operations, enter-
information on all available
resources—human and mate-
prise resource planning (ERP) systems expand the focus to the external envi-
rial—can be instantly obtained in ronment by including information about suppliers and customers. ERP
a fashion that eliminates produc- electronically integrates all of a firm’s departments so that, for example, pro-
tion delays and controls costs. duction can call up sales information and immediately know how much must