Ioq - Aut-10202-Cam-03
Ioq - Aut-10202-Cam-03
This is a representation of an electronic record that was signed electronically and this page is a
manifestation of the electronic signature. The electronic signatures for this document are maintained in
the Kneat system.
Pre-Approval
Signed By Signatory Capacity User Group Date
Parry, John Engineering Approval Engineering 20-Jan-2020 (UTC)
Signatory
Kent, Amy Validation Approval Signatory Validation 20-Jan-2020 (UTC)
Beyer, Jessica Manufacturing Approval Manufacturing 20-Jan-2020 (UTC)
Signatory
Isabelle, Richard Quality Assurance Approval QA 20-Jan-2020 (UTC)
Signatory
Post-Approval
Signed By Signatory Capacity User Group Date
Parry, John Engineering Approval Engineering 19-Mar-2020 (UTC)
Signatory
Kent, Amy Validation Approval Signatory Validation 19-Mar-2020 (UTC)
Waldmann, Lars Manufacturing Approval Manufacturing 19-Mar-2020 (UTC)
Signatory
Isabelle, Richard Quality Assurance Approval QA 19-Mar-2020 (UTC)
Signatory
INSTALLATION AND OPERATIONAL QUALIFICATION (IOQ)
PROTOCOL
Initial
Table of Contents
1 Purpose.................................................................................................................................... 6
2 Scope of Validation................................................................................................................... 7
2.1 Testing Strategies.............................................................................................................. 8
3 System Description.................................................................................................................38
4 References............................................................................................................................. 39
5 General Protocol Requirements..............................................................................................41
6 Protocol and SOP Training.....................................................................................................42
7 IQ Prerequisites...................................................................................................................... 44
7.1 Drawing Prerequisite........................................................................................................45
8 IQ Test Case List.................................................................................................................... 47
9 IQ Test Cases......................................................................................................................... 48
9.1 System Walkdown Verification (IOQ - AUT-10202-CAM-03-01).......................................49
9.1.1 Field Execution - System Walkdown Verification (IOQ - AUT-10202-CAM-03-01).....50
9.2 Supporting Utility Verification (IOQ - AUT-10202-CAM-03-02).........................................59
9.2.1 Field Execution - Supporting Utility Verification (IOQ - AUT-10202-CAM-03-02).......60
9.3 System Drawing Verification (IOQ - AUT-10202-CAM-03-03)..........................................62
9.3.1 Field Execution - System Drawing Verification (IOQ - AUT-10202-CAM-03-03)........62
9.4 System Component Verification (IOQ - AUT-10202-CAM-03-04).....................................64
9.4.1 Field Execution - System Component Verification (IOQ - AUT-10202-CAM-03-04)...65
9.5 Materials of Construction Verification (IOQ - AUT-10202-CAM-03-05).............................70
9.5.1 Field Execution - Materials of Construction Verification (IOQ - AUT-10202-CAM-03-
05)...................................................................................................................................... 71
9.6 System Calibration Verification (IOQ - AUT-10202-CAM-03-06)......................................73
9.6.1 Field Execution - System Calibration Verification (IOQ - AUT-10202-CAM-03-06)....73
9.7 Technical Supporting Documentation Verification (IOQ - AUT-10202-CAM-03-07)..........76
9.7.1 Field Execution - Technical Supporting Documentation Review (IOQ - AUT-10202-
CAM-03-07)........................................................................................................................ 76
9.8 Maintenance System Registration Verification (IOQ - AUT-10202-CAM-03-08)...............78
9.8.1 Field Execution - Maintenance System Registration Verification (IOQ - AUT-10202-
CAM-03-08)........................................................................................................................ 78
12.8.2 Field Execution - Autoclave Sterilization (Empty Chamber) - Test Run (IOQ - AUT-
10202-CAM-03-17)...........................................................................................................153
12.8.3 Field Execution - Autoclave Sterilization (Empty Chamber) - Test Results (IOQ -
AUT-10202-CAM-03-17)...................................................................................................154
12.9 Access Rights Testing (IOQ - AUT-10202-CAM-03-18)...............................................157
12.9.1 Field Execution - Access Rights Testing (IOQ - AUT-10202-CAM-03-18)..............160
12.10 Steam Quality Test (IOQ - AUT-10202-CAM-03-19)..................................................173
12.10.1 Field Execution - Steam Quality Test (IOQ - AUT-10202-CAM-03-19).................173
12.11 Leak Test (IOQ - AUT-10202-CAM-03-20).................................................................175
12.11.1 Field Execution - Leak Test (IOQ - AUT-10202-CAM-03-20)...............................176
12.12 Air Removal Test (IOQ - AUT-10202-CAM-03-21).....................................................179
12.12.1 Field Execution - Air Removal Test (IOQ - AUT-10202-CAM-03-21)...................183
13 System Instruments Calibration Verification........................................................................186
14 UR Traceability Matrix.........................................................................................................190
15 Protocol Deviations.............................................................................................................193
16 Attachments........................................................................................................................ 195
1 Purpose
This Installation and Operational Qualification (IOQ) protocol will provide documented evidence that the Key Fill
Finish Autoclave (ID# AUT-10202) in Room 175 is installed and operates as required per Brammer Bio User
Requirements, manufacturer's design specifications, and cGMP requirements.
This IOQ protocol will define all testing needed and outline the strategy to meet the installation and operational
qualification requirements defined per CC-19-296, MAN-000017.
Comments
# Comments Performed By Date
1 No comments. Coane, John 11-Feb-2020 (UTC)
2
3
Note: If there are no comments in the "Comments" table above, type "No Comments" in the first line. The
remaining empty rows will be considered "N/A". Otherwise, "N/A" all unused rows.
2 Scope of Validation
The scope of this IOQ protocol applies to the installation and operation of the system at Thermo Fisher Scientific,
Brammer Bio in Cambridge, MA. All required testing per CC-19-296, MAN-000017 will be performed in
this protocol unless listed and justified in Table 1 below.
Acceptance criteria required per SOP-000600 are satisfied by the test cases specified above.
# Comments Performed By Date
1 No comments Coane, John 11-Feb-2020 (UTC)
2
3
Note: If there are no comments in the "Comments" table above, type "No Comments" in the first line. The
remaining empty rows will be considered "N/A". Otherwise, "N/A" all unused rows.
The test strategies that will be followed for all IQ and OQ test cases in this protocol for AUT-10202 are listed in the below sections. Some of the testing
was completed during the commissioning (see CTP-AUT-10202-CAM-01) to satisfy qualification requirements. Any applicable test cases are
documented in this section.
Verify all GURs and SURs from the system UR meet required specifications.
The system P&IDs will be verified to reflect the installed state of the system.
Equipment, instruments, and components of the system will be verified to be present and installed.
Instrument Impact Assessments (IIAs) will be verified to have been performed for system instruments.
Supporting documentation for the system will be verified to have been received and stored.
The system and critical records associated with the system will be verified to be recorded in the CMMS. This includes the equipment record, system
impact assessments, and maintenance plans.
This test shall verify the current firmware and/or software version on the system and that a back-up version has been archived.
Any independent test instruments used during the execution of this protocol will be documented and verified to be with their calibration interval during
testing.
This test will verify that all alarms and interlocks identified in Table 1 are configured correctly and function as designed. All alarms have previously been
tested by the manufacturer during Site Acceptance Testing (SAT) with a Brammer Bio representative present. The manufacturer's testing will be attached
to this test case to support that all alarms function as designed. The vendor documentation (SAT) was pre-approved by ENG/CQV and post-approved by
ENG, CQV, and QAV.
The power backup test will verify that the HMI retains all system settings and parameters in the event of a power loss to the unit. A power failure
condition will be simulated for at least 15 minutes. Upon restoration of power to the HMI, all system settings and parameters, including user accounts and
programs, will be verified to be unchanged. Power Backup Testing shall be performed concurrently with Set Point Verification.
The equipment settings and set points (refer to Tables 2 - 5 below) will be verified and documented prior to any OQ test execution. This verification will
serve as the record of the settings that were used when the autoclave sterilization mapping activities took place. Following completion of all testing,
equipment, and/or control settings that were found to be acceptable during the validation will be documented. Set Point Verification shall be performed
concurrently with Power Backup Testing.
Any filter installed as part of this validation execution will be integrity tested prior to and after validation testing. Verifying filter integrity following validation
activities confirms the filter flow through properties were representative of normal operating conditions and confirms the process being validated didn’t
negatively impact the filter integrity. Filter Integrity Certification documentation will be included as part of this protocol execution.
This test will verify that all system recipes, prompts, and system functions progress as intended. One run will be performed for every cycle programmed
(refer to Tables 2 - 5). Testing can be completely concurrently with other operational tests.
This test will confirm that all valves are capable of opening and closing properly when controlled manually through the local HMI. One run will be
performed for each automatic valve on the system as listed in Table 6. Results of the test will be visually verified by confirming that each valve moves to
the proper position when prompted by the control system. The valve numbers provided in this test case are Belimed-specific numbers which are hard
coded into the GUI (Graphics User Interface).
Note: The door valves/releases will be implicitly tested by the opening and closing the system door. The door release and door close sequence can
damage the door seal if performed incorrectly. Therefore, only the programmed automated open/close buttons will be used to challenge the valves and
not manual forcing functions.
Testing was performed as part of the SAT and witnessed by Brammer (Thermo-Fisher) personnel. Therefore, this testing does not need to be repeated
and the original acceptable testing results are referenced.
The Autoclave sterilization programs are made up of three main phases: pre-treatment, sterilization, and post-treatment. The only applicable program
used to process GMP materials will be performed under empty chamber conditions for the Wrapped Goods cycle. One successful run will be required for
each cycle per SOP-000601. The empty chamber mapping will be conducted with the autoclave rack/cart in place.
Note that the Bowie Dick Test cycle has been programmed with an identical pre-conditioning phase as the Wrapped Goods cycle. This shall ensure that
any sterilized materials under the Wrapped Goods program can successfully remove air prior to the sterilization phase and therefore does not require
empty chamber mapping. Additionally, the Filter Inline Sterilization cycle will not be challenged in this test case. This program will not be used to sterilize
materials in the chamber and is strictly limited to sterilizing the air filter.
Pre-Treatment
The pre-treatment phase consists of a number of pressure variations following a certain pattern which removes air from the chamber and load items. As
steam enters it and comes in contact with cooler surface of chamber or load items and condenses resulting into condensation boundary. When the steam
valve is closed and the dram valve is opened during pre-treatment the pressure drops quickly. Due to pressure drops the air expands quickly and
moisture from the condensation boundary evaporates and pushes out air. Similarly a subsequent pre-vacuum pulse reduces the air from chamber and
produces the moisture required in the later phase of sterilization. Air removal when autoclaving aqueous solutions in open containers is made by a single
pre-vacuum or flowing steam in order to avoid that the liquid comes to boiling during the decompression periods in a pulsating procedure.
Sterilization
The sterilizing time starts (counting down) when the chamber temperature transducer signals a temperature equal to or higher than the chamber
temperature set point. Count down of the sterilizing time stops at temperatures below this threshold temperature.
Post-Treatment
The post-treatment is intended to normalize the temperature and moisture content of the goods. All types of goods except liquids therefore are exposed
to a deep vacuum for a certain period of time. The post-treatment of aqueous solutions sterilized in open or vented containers consists of a period of
natural cooling while pressure and temperature are lowered slowly until the temperature of the liquid is safely below its boiling point This process
increased by applying a slight vacuum to the chamber when its pressure approaches atmospheric.The sterilizer door will remain sealed by its gasket until
atmospheric pressure prevails in the chamber.
Temperature Monitoring Devices (TMDs) will be placed throughout the chamber to verify heat distribution and elucidate cold spots. Heat
distribution studies determine whether the temperature is uniform throughout the empty chamber. A pre-approved TMD Placement Map will show the
TMD locations in the chamber. The Temperature Mapping Run data will be reviewed by Engineering/CQV to ensure it meets temperature
requirements in all locations.
Per SOP-000601, the following criteria must met for the acceptable sterilization cycle:
- The base temperature criteria during exposure must be 121.1°C. Lethality calculations must be performed using the data.
-- All TMDs must remain over 121.1°C accumulating an F0 greater than or equal to 12 minutes (during exposure).
For validation exercise purposes an “overkill” approach will be used with a sterilization set point of 123.5ºC. A full cycle will be performed during the
empty chamber for each program.
A theoretical F0 calculation (lethality) will be included for information only for empty chamber sterilization testing (no microorganism (BIs) will be used
during this phase). F0 calculation formula will be as follows:
Since a theoretical calculation will be performed the following assumptions will be taken in consideration:
This OQ protocol testing (empty chamber temperature mapping) will be performed to confirm uniform distribution of the heat throughout the chamber. It
also confirms that all the TMDs installed per mapping diagram are achieving specified temperature setpoint for the duration of the exposure period.
Biological indicators are only used in PQ protocols (with a defined load pattern) to prove the sterilization cycle parameters are effective to kill BI
organisms.
Autoclave AUT-10202 have 5 different default levels, listed in Table 7. One user account from each security level will be tested to verify that the proper
functions and restrictions are assigned to each user group based on their security level. The selected accounts will also be tested to ensure that the
default password is correct and that incorrect passwords do not grant access to the user account (refer to Table 8).
Note: A subset of access permissions is bracketed by default for each access level.
Steam Quality Testing for this unit has previously been completed by an outside vendor with a Brammer Bio representative present. The vendor's test
report will be attached to this test case to support that all acceptance criteria were met.
The steam entering the Material Prep Autoclave AUT-10202 will be tested for steam quality in alignment with EN285 requirements; test acceptance
criteria is detailed in Table 9 below.
The steam dryness measures the fraction of steam relative to water that reaches the autoclave. Wet steam does not deliver as much energy to the load
dry steam and results in less sterilizing capabilities.
The non-condensable gas test measures the amount of air relative to steam that reaches the autoclave. More air in the mixture will result in less energy
transferred and less sterilizing power. The percentage of non-condensable gases is required to be less than or equal to 3.5% by volume.
The superheat test measures the amount of moisture in the steam relative to the saturation limit of the steam at the working temperature at atmospheric
pressure. If the moisture content is the lower than the saturation limit, the energy in the steam is too high and can damage goods in the autoclave. The
amount of superheat present in the steam should be no more than 25 Kelvin at atmospheric pressure.
Leak Test
The purpose of this test is to determine the integrity of an autoclave chamber. The autoclave is equipped with a program for automatic leak test of the
autoclave chamber. This test exposes the autoclave to vacuum conditions and measures how much vacuum depth was lost over a given period of time.
The program parameters are listed in Tables 2 - 5 above a leak test shall be performed with an empty chamber. The test run that will be performed for
sequence timer testing will be utilized to verify the leak test. The pressure rise shall be not greater than 1.3 mbar/min during the test.
The purpose of this test is to detect any leaks and inadequate air removal. The Bowie Dick Test Pack (I50246/SPEC 7664) is used to perform this
testing. Sterilizer vacuum performance is acceptable if the sheet inside the test pack shows a uniform color change. Entrapped air will cause a spot to
appear on the test sheet due to the inability of the steam to reach the chemical indicator.
The test pack will be placed horizontally on the lowest shelf above the drain and a Bowie Dick cycle will be initiated. The test pack will be placed
during the sequence/timer testing for the Bowie Dick Test cycle and results will be documented.
The pattern of the Bowie Dick indicator paper shows same saturation with color (Dark Purple) all over its surface after complete sterilization. The cycle
fails if the indicator paper color is light yellow.
Comments
# Comments Performed By Date
1 No comments Coane, John 11-Mar-2020 (UTC)
2
3
Note: If there are no comments in the "Comments" table above, type "No Comments" in the first line. The remaining empty rows will be considered
"N/A". Otherwise, "N/A" all unused rows.
3 System Description
AUT-10202 is a Belimed model 10-6-10 HS1 BST 6050/6060 series autoclave with the following features:
• Installed via recession through walls and inspection door mounted in extended fascia
• Single door
• Chamber Internal Dimensions: 1.149m H x 0.669m W x 1.050m L
• Chamber volume is approximately 807 L.
• 480V, 3 phase 60 Hz power supply
• Steam supply has a condensate return
• Stainless steel sanitary process piping and jacket piping
• Equipped with an Allen Bradley Versa View 5400 control panel / system
• Stainless steel electrical cabinet, rated NEMA 4XSS
• System is networked to a HP M553 series printer (S/N JPCCM9K47H) and can print batch reports following
completion of a run cycle.
• System is connected to PI historian with probes continuously monitoring system status.
The PLC control unit is fully programmed to provide sterilization using central steam supply. Programmed cycles
use pre-vacuum pulses, positive pulses, and gravity displacement for non-condensable gas removal. Saturated
clean steam is used to sterilize both wrapped and liquid components.
Comments
# Comment Performed By Date
1 No comments Coane, John 11-Feb-2020 (UTC)
2
3
Note: If there are no comments in the "Comments" table above, type "No Comments" in the first line. The
remaining empty rows will be considered "N/A". Otherwise, "N/A" all unused rows.
4 References
The following documents are referenced and/or used for generation of the protocol.
References
# Document Number Title Version #
1 SOP-000344 Kneat Protocol Execution 1.0
2 SOP-000345 Kneat Protocol Development 2.0
3 SOP-000452 Manufacturing Automation Systems Validation 1.0
4 SOP-000518 Manual Operation of Filter Integrity Testers 4.0
5 SOP-000600 Installation Qualification (IQ) Validation of Utilities and Equipment Systems 2.0
6 SOP-000601 Operational Qualification (OQ) Validation of Utilities and Equipment Systems 2.0
7 SOP-000603 Facility, Utility, and Equipment Validation Protocol Deviations 2.0
8 SOP-000608 Risk Assessment for Validation of Facilities, Utilities and Equipment Systems 4.0
9 SOP-000609 Validation Documentation Guidelines and Requirements for Facility, Utility, and Equipment Systems 1.0
10 SOP-000629 Good Documentation Practices (GDP) Procedure 5.0
11 SOP-000651 Electronic Record and Electronic Signature 1.0
12 SOP-000447 Cambridge Metrology Program 3.0
13 SOP-000457 Preventative Maintenance Program 2.0
14 SOP-000439 Facilities and Engineering Activities for New Systems or Modified Direct Impact Systems 3.0
15 SOP-001252 Operation and Maintenance of Belimed Autoclave (Key) 1.0
16 DC-000452 cGMP Autoclave 3.0
17 CC-19-296 Project Key: New Autoclave (AUT-10202) N/A
18 MAN-000017 Project Key Validation Project Plan 1.0
19 EN285 Sterilization - Steam Sterilizers - Large Sterilizers 2015
Edition
20 ISO17665 International Standard: Sterilization of Health Products – Moist Heat First
Edition
Comments
# Comment Performed By Date
1 No comments Coane, John 11-Feb-2020 (UTC)
2
3
Note: If there are no comments in the "Comments" table above, type "No Comments" in the first line. The
remaining empty rows will be considered "N/A". Otherwise, "N/A" all unused rows.
1. The qualification entries must be completed in compliance with SOP-000629, Good Documentation Practices (GDP) Procedure, and SOP-
000651, Electronic Record and Electronic Signatures.
2. Perform all of the steps outlined in the test tables for each of the required Test Case subsections.
3. Record the information required by the step and attach any supporting documentation as requested. Refer to Attachments section for attaching
documentation.
4. Where requested, record "Pass" in the Pass/Fail column, if the Actual Results met the Expected Results. Otherwise, record "Fail" and generate a
protocol deviation per SOP-000344 and/or SOP-000603. Refer to Deviations section for generation of deviations.
5. Electronically sign for each step at the time the activity is performed.
6. The Test Case will be considered complete once all of the step rows have been signed and all deviations have been approved.
Comments
# Comments Performed By Date
1 No comments Coane, John 11-Feb-2020 (UTC)
2
3
Note: If there are no comments in the "Comments" table above, type "No Comments" in the first line. The remaining empty rows will be considered
"N/A". Otherwise, "N/A" all unused rows.
The CQV Department will ensure that training is performed and documented prior to execution of the protocol. All other personnel must be trained on
applicable operational procedures and on this protocol prior to performing any execution activities.
A person is considered trained on the protocol if they authored or pre-approved the protocol. All other personnel performing testing are required to sign
the training log in Table 1 below. The trainee's electronic signature below signifies that the trainee:
All trainee signatures must be accompanied by a trainer signature. Any personnel that have been trained or are considered trained on this protocol are
able to train additional personnel.
All personnel performing execution activities must be trained on all relevant and applicable SOPs. Prior to executing any testing that is governed by an
SOP, personnel must record the SOP title, the SOP effective date, and the training date in Table 2 below. If draft versions of SOPs will be used to
execute this protocol, a formal training date may not be applicable. Attach the draft version of the SOP(s) in Section 15.
Comments
# Comments Performed By Date
1 See Deviation IOQ-IOQ-AUT-10202-CAM-03-DEV-03 in Section 15 "Protocol Deviations" for details. Coane, John 11-Mar-2020 (UTC)
2 N/A Coane, John 11-Mar-2020 (UTC)
3 N/A Coane, John 11-Mar-2020 (UTC)
Note: If there are no comments in the "Comments" table above, type "No Comments" in the first line. The remaining empty rows will be considered
"N/A". Otherwise, "N/A" all unused rows.
7 IQ Prerequisites
Verify each prerequisite condition has been met prior to executing the IQ validation tests contained in this
protocol. If a prerequisite has not been satisfied, provide a documented rationale including the impact, if any, to
testing. The information documented below has been assessed and the signature for each prerequisite indicates
requirement completion and the permission to proceed to execution.
P&IDs used during the execution of this protocol are identified below and must be, at a minimum, in draft version prior to the execution of the test case(s)
that use the P&ID as a reference.
Comments
# Comments: Performed By Date
1 No comments Coane, John 05-Mar-2020
(UTC)
2
Page 45 of 196 01-Mar-2023 (UTC)
Document Number: IOQ - AUT-10202-CAM-03
Document Version: 1.0
Equipment ID: AUT-10202
Document Name: Installation and Operational Qualification Protocol for AUT-10202
Comments
# Comments: Performed By Date
3
Note: If there are no comments in the "Additional Comments" table above, type "No Comments" in the first line. The remaining empty rows will be
considered "N/A". Otherwise, "N/A" all unused rows.
9 IQ Test Cases
1. Objective
Verify and confirm that the system has been properly installed and ready for use.
2. Scope
The scope of this test is to verify that system applicable requirements are met and will ensure that the system
has been properly installed and operates/performs properly.
3. Acceptance Criteria
• All GURs and SURs from the associated system UR have been verified.
Procedure:
1. Perform a walkdown/visual inspection verification for each GUR/SUR item listed under the current autoclave user requirements document (DC-
000452 version 3) in Table 1.
2. Verify that each item is found to be acceptable.
3. Attach a copy of any supporting document, if necessary/applicable.
Comments
# Comments: Performed By Date
1 No comments Coane, John 02-Mar-2020
(UTC)
2
3
Note: If there are no comments in the "Additional Comments" table above, type "No Comments" in the first line. The remaining empty rows will be
considered "N/A". Otherwise, "N/A" all unused rows.
1. Objective
Verify that all supporting utilities are supplied to the system in accordance with manufacturer specifications.
2. Scope
The scope of this test is to verify that system applicable requirements are met and will ensure that the system
has been properly installed and operates/performs properly.
3. Acceptance Criteria
Procedure:
Comments
# Comments: Performed By Date
1 No comments Coane, John 05-Mar-2020 (UTC)
Comments
# Comments: Performed By Date
2
3
Note: If there are no comments in the "Additional Comments" table above, type "No Comments" in the first line. The remaining empty rows will be considered "N/A". Otherwise, "N/A" all unused rows.
1. Test Objective
Ensure that each system drawing exists and have been verified to accurately reflect the system installed.
2. Scope
All components and piping within the system’s boundary for System # AUT-10202 on all the applicable drawings will be verified in this test case.
Verification will consist at a minimum:
3. Acceptance Criteria
• System P&IDs have been verified against the installed system and any redlines have been submitted for revision.
Procedure:
1. Obtain a copy of the current version of the applicable system drawing(s) and perform a visual verification (drawing walk-down).
2. Record the Revision # in the table.
3. Verify that the “as-built” drawing represents the system installed.
4. Highlight accurate system drawing confirmations during walk-down with yellow highlighter. If the drawing does not accurately represent the
installed equipment/system, overlay corrections with redlines on the as-built drawing.
5. If the drawing walk-down verifies the accuracy of the as-built drawing, comment "Walk-Down Complete without corrections", initial and date.
6. Attach a copy of the drawing verified.
7. If a drawing did not accurately represent the installed equipment/system, reference the SAP order that contains the drawing redline and drives
the drawing revision.
Comments
# Comments: Performed By Date
1 Protocol generation error. Drawing Number column in Table 1 was incorrectly documented during protocol draft. Drawing Number should be '250- Coane, John 11-Feb-2020
D2-10202' instead of '250-D3-10202'. (UTC)
2 See Deviation #4 in section 15 "Protocol Deviations" for details. Coane, John 11-Mar-2020
(UTC)
Page 62 of 196 01-Mar-2023 (UTC)
Document Number: IOQ - AUT-10202-CAM-03
Document Version: 1.0
Equipment ID: AUT-10202
Document Name: Installation and Operational Qualification Protocol for AUT-10202
Comments
# Comments: Performed By Date
3 N/A Coane, John 06-Mar-2020
(UTC)
Note: If there are no comments in the "Comments" table above, type "No Comments" in the first line. The remaining empty rows will be considered
"N/A". Otherwise, "N/A" all unused rows.
1. Test Objective
Confirm that all equipment, instruments, and/or components within the system boundary are installed and meet engineering and manufacturer
specifications.
2. Scope
All equipment components identified as having direct impact on product quality within the System # AUT-10202 boundary will be verified in this test case.
3. Acceptance Criteria
• All equipment, instruments, and/or components have been physically verified to be installed correctly.
• All equipment, instruments, and/or components meet the required engineering and manufacturer acceptance criteria.
Procedure:
1. In Table 1, record the make, model number, and serial number (if available) of each piece of equipment and component identified in the table.
2. "N/A" cells if verification is not applicable to the listed component.
Comments
# Comments Performed By Date
1 SAP records for all components are attached in Section 16, line 1. Coane, John 11-Feb-2020 (UTC)
2 Q1001 is in two parts and each part has a unique model number but the same serial number Coane, John 11-Mar-2020 (UTC)
3 N/A Coane, John 06-Mar-2020 (UTC)
Note: If there are no comments in the "Comments" table above, type "No Comments" in the first line. The remaining empty rows will be considered "N/A". Otherwise, "N/A" all unused rows.
1. Test Objective
Verify that proper documentation is available to prove that all product or process contact components meet or
exceed engineering requirements.
2. Scope
All equipment and/or components that have been identified as having direct product contact or direct impact on
product quality within System # AUT-10202 boundary will be verified in this test case.
Note: Including line components (e.g. piping, major components, valves, and product-contact instrumentation)
3. Acceptance Criteria
• All product or process contact components on the system meet or exceed the material and surface finish
requirements per GEP-ST-007.
Procedure:
1. Verify the “Specified" Data and ensure the specifications outlined in GEP-ST-007 are met. If the material is acceptable, record “Yes” in the "Met
Specifications?" Column. Otherwise, record “No”.
2. Attach the supporting document in Table 1.
Comments
# Comments: Recorded By Date
1 Documents are in the ETOP in the cut sheets, mechanical drawings, and component list. See section 9.7. Materials of construction were verified Coane, John 05-Mar-2020
in the FAT and confirmed in CTP-AUT-10202-CAM-01 (Commissioning). (UTC)
2 N/A Coane, John 05-Mar-2020
(UTC)
3 N/A Coane, John 05-Mar-2020
(UTC)
Note: If there are no comments in the "Comments" table above, type "No Comments" in the first line. The remaining empty rows will be considered
"N/A". Otherwise, "N/A" all unused rows.
1. Test Objective
Ensure that all instruments in the system have been assessed for calibration per SOP-000439.
2. Scope
3. Acceptance Criteria
• Instrument Impact Assessments (IIAs) were performed for all system instruments per SOP-000439.
Procedure:
1. For each of the instruments identified as requiring calibration, verify that an IIA has been approved and the instrument has been registered in the
Cambridge Metrology Program.
2. Attach or reference the storage location of the approved IIA.
3. If the instrument has been assessed, record "Yes" in the "Meets Requirements?" column, otherwise record "No".
Comments
# Comments: Performed By Date
1 No Comments Coane, John 11-Feb-2020 (UTC)
2
3
Note: If there are no comments in the "Comments" table above, type "No Comments" in the first line. The remaining empty rows will be considered
"N/A". Otherwise, "N/A" all unused rows.
1. Objective
Ensure that the required supporting documentation for this system has been received and the storage location is documented.
2. Scope
All required technical supporting documentation for System # AUT-10202 will be verified in this test case.
3. Acceptance Criteria
• Required supporting documentation for this system has been received and the storage location is documented.
Procedure
1. Verify and locate the listed documents in Table 1 for this system.
2. Attach the document or record the document location in Table 1.
Page 75 of 196 01-Mar-2023 (UTC)
Document Number: IOQ - AUT-10202-CAM-03
Document Version: 1.0
Equipment ID: AUT-10202
Document Name: Installation and Operational Qualification Protocol for AUT-10202
3. If the document has been received and it has either been attached to the protocol or is stored in an acceptable location, record "Yes" in the
"Documentation Acceptable?" column. Otherwise record "No".
Comments
# Comments Performed By Date
1 ETOP is hyperlinked in Table 1 line 1 in the Document Location column. Coane, John 05-Mar-2020 (UTC)
2 N/A Coane, John 06-Mar-2020 (UTC)
3 N/A Coane, John 06-Mar-2020 (UTC)
Note: If there are no comments in the "Comments" table above, type "No Comments" in the first line. The remaining empty rows will be considered
"N/A". Otherwise, "N/A" all unused rows.
1. Objective
Verify that the system has been registered in the Brammer Bio Maintenance System per SOP-000439 and SOP-000457.
2. Scope
All critical records associated with System # AUT-10202 will be verified to be recorded in the Brammer Bio maintenance system. Critical records include
the equipment record, impact assessments, maintenance plans, and task lists.
3. Acceptance Criteria
• The system and all required components have been registered in the CMMS per SOP-000439 and SOP-000457.
Procedure:
2. Locate the equipment record for AUT-10202. Verify that all system information (manufacturer, model, S/N, etc.) in the equipment record is
accurate.
3. Verify that equipment records have been created for all applicable components within the system. Verify that all components have been assigned
as subordinate equipment to System # AUT-10202.
4. Verify that a System Impact Assessment for the system has been completed per SOP-000439 and SOP-000457. Verify that a copy of the SIA
has been attached to the equipment record.
5. Verify that the correct designation has been assigned to the "System Impact Assessment" field in the equipment record.
6. Ensure that Engineering has created all necessary maintenance plans in the maintenance system.
Comments
# Comments: Performed By Date
1 No Comments Coane, John 11-Feb-2020
(UTC)
Comments
# Comments: Performed By Date
2
3
Note: If there are no comments in the "Comments" table above, type "No Comments" in the first line. The remaining empty rows will be considered
"N/A". Otherwise, "N/A" all unused rows.
1. Objective
Ensure that embedded software for the operation of the system is recorded and has been appropriately backed up and archived.
2. Scope
Embedded software for System # AUT-10202 and all applicable components will be verified in this test case.
3. Acceptance Criteria
• The current firmware or software version on the system has been documented.
Procedure:
1. Record the File Name, Version No. and Date of the embedded software in Table 1.
2. Verify that a software backed up has been performed by recording the back-up storage location in Table 1.
Comments
# Comments: Performed By Date
1 No comments Coane, John 11-Feb-2020 (UTC)
2
3
Note: If there are no comments in the "Comments" table above, type "No Comments" in the first line. The remaining empty rows will be considered
"N/A". Otherwise, "N/A" all unused rows.
10 OQ Prerequisites
Verify each installation prerequisite condition has been met prior to executing the operational validation tests contained in this protocol. If a prerequisite
has not been satisfied, provide a documented rationale including the impact, if any, to operational testing.
The information documented below has been assessed and the approval signature below indicates the permission to proceed to OQ execution.
Comments
# Comments Performed By Date
1 No comments Coane, John 02-Mar-2020 (UTC)
2
3
Note: If there are no comments in the "Comments" table above, type "No Comments" in the first line. The remaining empty rows will be considered
"N/A". Otherwise, "N/A" all unused rows.
Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) for the operation of the system are identified below and must be, at a minimum, in draft prior to the execution of
the test case(s) that use the operational SOP to perform the test.
Comments
# Comment Performed By Date
1 No Comments Coane, John 11-Feb-2020 (UTC)
2
3
Note: If there are no comments in the "Comments" table above, type "No Comments" in the first line. The remaining empty rows will be considered
"N/A". Otherwise, "N/A" all unused rows.
Comments
# Comments Performed By Date
1 No Comments Coane, John 11-Feb-2020 (UTC)
2
Comments
# Comments Performed By Date
3
Note: If there are no comments in the "Comments" table above, type "No Comments" in the first line. The remaining empty rows will be considered
"N/A". Otherwise, "N/A" all unused rows.
12 OQ Test Cases
1. Test Objective
Confirm that the test equipment used during testing has been calibrated and is verified to be within the calibration frequency.
2. Scope
This test will apply to any test equipment and/or instruments used within the execution of the protocol.
3. Acceptance Criteria
Procedure:
1. Setup the Kaye loggers for pre-calibration per SOP-000604 using the recommendations in Attachment 3 of SOP-000601.
2. Record the required pre-calibration information in Table 1.
3. Attach the pre-calibration report in Table 2. If any loggers fail pre-calibration, substitute the failed loggers and repeat pre-calibration.
4. Perform execution in this protocol as necessary with the Kaye loggers.
5. When all execution with the Kaye loggers is complete, perform a post-calibration check of the loggers.
6. Perform the post-calibration using the recommended setpoints, tolerances, and stabilities in Attachment 3 of SOP-000601.
7. Record the required post-calibration information in Table 3.
8. Attach the post-calibration report in Table 4. If any loggers fail post-calibration, perform an assessment per the instructions in Attachment
3 of SOP-000601 to determine the impact to the test(s) in this protocol.
Comments
# Comments Performed by Date
1 Kaye Setup Report is attached in Section 16. Coane, John 05-Mar-2020
(UTC)
2 loggers in the study are TCs Coane, John 05-Mar-2020
(UTC)
3 N/A Coane, John 06-Mar-2020
(UTC)
Note: If there are no comments in the "Comments" table above, type "No Comments" in the first line. The remaining empty rows will be considered
"N/A". Otherwise, "N/A" all unused rows.
12.1.2 Field Execution - Stand-Alone Test Equipment Calibration Verification (IOQ - AUT-10202-CAM-03-10)
List the test equipment below used for the execution of this protocol.
Comments
# Comments: Performed By Date
1 No comments Coane, John 11-Mar-2020
(UTC)
Comments
# Comments: Performed By Date
2
3
Note: If there are no comments in the "Comments" table above, type "No Comments" in the first line. The remaining empty rows will be considered
"N/A". Otherwise, "N/A" all unused rows.
1. Test Objective
Provide evidence that critical alarms activate correctly and interlocks occur as designed.
This test will verify that all alarms and interlocks identified in Table 1 of Section 2.1 are configured correctly and function as designed. All alarms have
previously been tested by the manufacturer during Site Acceptance Testing (SAT) with a Brammer Bio representative present. The manufacturer's testing
will be attached to this test case to support that all alarms function as designed. The vendor documentation (SAT) was pre-approved by ENG/CQV and
post-approved by ENG, CQV, and QAV.
2. Scope
This test case covers the critical Alarms and Interlocks associated with System # AUT-10202 identified in Table 1 of Section 2.1.
3. Acceptance Criteria
• All critical alarms and interlocks associated with the system function as designed.
Procedure:
1. Confirm in Table 1 that each alarm was successfully tested and confirm to function as designed during the manufacturer's testing.
2. Attach a copy of the manufacturer's alarm testing in Table 2.
53 AlarmFc95 Correlation - Chamber pressure in relation to chamber temperature too Yes Coane, John 02-Mar-2020 (UTC)
high
54 AlarmFc96 Undertemperature T1 Yes Coane, John 02-Mar-2020 (UTC)
55 AlarmFc97 Undertemperature T2 Yes Coane, John 02-Mar-2020 (UTC)
56 AlarmFc98 Undertemperature T3 Yes Coane, John 02-Mar-2020 (UTC)
57 AlarmFc99 Undertemperature T4 Yes Coane, John 02-Mar-2020 (UTC)
58 AlarmFc100 Undertemperature T5 Yes Coane, John 02-Mar-2020 (UTC)
59 AlarmFc103 Undertemperature T8 Yes Coane, John 02-Mar-2020 (UTC)
60 AlarmFc105 Undertemperature T10 Yes Coane, John 02-Mar-2020 (UTC)
61 AlarmFc106 Undertemperature T11 Yes Coane, John 02-Mar-2020 (UTC)
114 AlarmHw144 Sensor air detector temperature T8, input value under limit or Yes Coane, John 02-Mar-2020 (UTC)
exceeded limit
115 AlarmHw148 Sensor cooling temperature backflow T10, input value under limit or Yes Coane, John 02-Mar-2020 (UTC)
exceeded limit
116 AlarmHw150 Sensor condensator temperature T11, input value under limit or Yes Coane, John 02-Mar-2020 (UTC)
exceeded limit
117 AlarmHw152 Sensor circulation container temperature T12, input value under limit or Yes Coane, John 02-Mar-2020 (UTC)
exceeded limit
118 AlarmHmi1 Automatic creation of report at end of batch failed Yes Coane, John 02-Mar-2020 (UTC)
119 AlarmHmi2 Automatic print of report at end of batch failed Yes Coane, John 02-Mar-2020 (UTC)
120 AlarmHmi3 Automatic export of report as PDF at end of batch failed Yes Coane, John 02-Mar-2020 (UTC)
Comments
# Comments Performed By Date
1 No comments Coane, John 02-Mar-2020 (UTC)
2
3
Note: If there are no comments in the "Comments" table above, type "No Comments" in the first line. The remaining empty rows will be considered "N/A". Otherwise, "N/A" all unused rows.
1. Test Objective
Provide evidence that the unit's internal backup power system is functional and restores critical system functionality after a primary power loss.
2. Scope
This section is only applicable to test the internal back-up power of System # AUT-10202 and is not applicable to systems with no user requirement for
backup power.
3. Acceptance Criteria
• The system maintained the current equipment settings and operating parameters after a primary power loss.
Comments
# Comments: Performed By Date
1 Table 1 line 6 the batch report for this cycle was corrupted and could not be printed as the system did not properly shutdown. The Batch Coane, John 06-Mar-2020
Number is 221 (Wrapped Goods Cycle). (UTC)
2 N/A Coane, John 06-Mar-2020
(UTC)
3 N/A Coane, John 06-Mar-2020
(UTC)
Note: If there are no comments in the "Comments" table above, type "No Comments" in the first line. The remaining empty rows will be considered
"N/A". Otherwise, "N/A" all unused rows.
1. Test Objective
Record the as-found and as-left critical system settings and setpoints.
2. Scope
This test section will cover the System # AUT-10202 settings. The verification will consist on documenting the
settings as found on the system prior to OQ Qualification testing and a confirmation of the as-left equipment and
control settings.
3. Acceptance Criteria
• The as-found settings and/or setpoints on the system were recorded prior to qualification testing.
• The as-left settings and/or setpoints on the system were recorded at the conclusion of all testing.
Procedure:
1. Record the as-found settings, parameters, and/or set points on the system in Table 1, Table 2, Table 3, and Table 4.
2. This test case shall be performed concurrently with Power Backup Testing.
Table 1: As-Found Wrapped Goods Parameter Verification
Parameter Expected Parameter Value As-Found Parameter Value Parameter Value Acceptable? Performed By Date
(Yes / No)
Jacket pressure 2150 mbar 2150 mbar Yes Coane, John 02-Mar-2020 (UTC)
Liquid sterilization program not active not active Yes Coane, John 06-Feb-2020 (UTC)
Temperature monitoring pre- Active Sensor 1, Sensor 2 Active Sensor 1, Sensor 2 Yes Coane, John 06-Feb-2020 (UTC)
Treatment
Pos. temperature hysteresis 5.0 °C 5.0 °C Yes Coane, John 06-Feb-2020 (UTC)
Neg. temperature hysteresis 1.0 °C 1.0 °C Yes Coane, John 06-Feb-2020 (UTC)
Air detector not active not active Yes Coane, John 06-Feb-2020 (UTC)
Temperature monitoring Active Sensor 1, Sensor 2 Active Sensor 1, Sensor 2 Yes Coane, John 06-Feb-2020 (UTC)
sterilization
Correlation monitoring not active not active Yes Coane, John 06-Feb-2020 (UTC)
Differential monitoring of control active active Yes Coane, John 06-Feb-2020 (UTC)
sensors
F0 value calculation not active not active Yes Coane, John 06-Feb-2020 (UTC)
Pos. temperature hysteresis 3.0°C 3.0°C Yes Coane, John 06-Feb-2020 (UTC)
Neg. temperature hysteresis 0.0°C 0.0°C Yes Coane, John 06-Feb-2020 (UTC)
Temperature monitoring Post Active Sensor 1, Sensor 2 Active Sensor 1, Sensor 2 Yes Coane, John 06-Feb-2020 (UTC)
Treatment
Comments
# Comments Performed By Date
1 Tables 1 and 4 have an expected parameter value of 600 seconds for "Additional time evacuation" during the post-treatment phase. This was Coane, John 02-Mar-2020
due to a protocol generation error. The correct value should be 60 seconds as documented during execution. Refer to Deviation #2 in Section (UTC)
15.
2 Table 2 "Report filter value 6 **" in the SteamFrac is recorded as "6" as field only accepts numerical values. This was a protocol generation Coane, John 06-Mar-2020
error. (UTC)
Comments
# Comments Performed By Date
3 N/A Coane, John 06-Mar-2020
(UTC)
Note: If there are no comments in the "Comments" table above, type "No Comments" in the first line. The remaining empty rows will be considered "N/A". Otherwise,"N/A" all unused rows.
Procedure:
1. Record the as-left settings and/or set points on the system in Table 5, Table 6, Table 7, and Table 8.
Comments
# Comments: Performed By Date
1 Tables 5 and 8 have an expected parameter value of 600 seconds for "Additional time evacuation" during the post-treatment phase. This was due to Coane, John 02-Mar-2020
a protocol generation error. The correct value should be 60 seconds as documented during execution. Refer to Deviation #2 in Section 15. (UTC)
2 Table 6 "Report filter value 6 **" in the SteamFrac is recorded as "6" as field only accepts numerical values. This was a protocol generation error. Coane, John 12-Mar-2020
(UTC)
3 N/A Coane, John 06-Mar-2020
(UTC)
Note: If there are no comments in the "Comments" table above, type "No Comments" in the first line. The remaining empty rows will be considered "N/A". Otherwise, "N/A" all unused rows.
1. Test Objective.
Provide evidence that the filters used during the validation are integral and that the certification has been conducted according to Brammer specifications
and//or SOPs.
2. Scope
This test is applicable to all new or modified filters within the System # AUT-10202.
3. Acceptance Criteria
• All sterilizing grade filters have been verified to be integral prior to and after any validation activities requiring their use.
12.5.1 Field Execution - Filter Integrity Test Certification Verification (IOQ - AUT-10202-CAM-03-14)
Procedure:
Filter Cartridge:
Pall/ AB05PFR2PVH4
2 V3101 / V3102 (After Wrapped Goods Filter Housing: Pall/ N/A Post-Use FIT.JPG Pass Coane, John 03-Mar-2020
cycle) PGTD105G23UD1H4 (UTC)
Comments
# Comments: Performed By Date
1 The Filter Integrity Tests were performed as the last test cases of the OQ. A wrapped goods cycle and a In-Line Filter Sterilization cycle was run Coane, John 06-Mar-2020
between the pre and post filter integrity verification tests. (UTC)
2 The Wrapped Goods and In-Line Filter Sterilization batch reports are presented in Section 16. Coane, John 12-Mar-2020
(UTC)
3 The date format in the Belimed autoclave Batch Reports is dd/mm/yyyy. Coane, John 12-Mar-2020
(UTC)
Note: If there are no comments in the "Additional Comments" table above, type "No Comments" in the first line. The remaining empty rows will be
considered "N/A". Otherwise, "N/A" all unused rows.
1. Test Objective
Provide evidence that equipment with embedded software correctly sequences through process steps as required.
2. Scope
This test is required for for all components of System # AUT-10202 that have an embedded control system.
NOTE: This testing is only required if the equipment has an embedded control system or is a standalone system with security functions.
4. Acceptance Criteria
• Each recipe and/or critical control module on the system operates and transitions as specified.
Procedure:
Comments
# Comments Performed By Date
1 The date format in the Belimed autoclave Batch Reports is dd/mm/yyyy. Coane, John 12-Mar-2020
(UTC)
2 N/A Coane, John 12-Mar-2020
(UTC)
3 N/A Coane, John 12-Mar-2020
(UTC)
Note: If there are no comments in the "Comments" table above, type "No Comments" in the first line. The remaining empty rows will be considered "N/A". Otherwise, "N/A" all unused rows.
1. Test Objective
Provide evidence that the valves communicate correctly and the user interface reflects the appropriate status of the valve.
Note: The valve numbers provided in this test case are Belimed-specific numbers which are hard coded into the GUI (Graphics User Interface).
2. Scope
All automated valves in System # AUT-10202 will be verified in this test case.
3. Acceptance Criteria
• All automated valves on the system respond and communicate properly with the control system.
Procedure:
Comments
# Comments Performed By Date
1 The autoclave door can be returned to the 'closed door' state after the door is fully opened. Coane, John 03-Mar-2020
(UTC)
2 N/A Coane, John 03-Mar-2020
(UTC)
3 N/A Coane, John 03-Mar-2020
(UTC)
Note: If there are no comments in the "Comments" table above, type "No Comments" in the first line. The remaining empty rows will be considered
"N/A". Otherwise, "N/A" all unused rows.
1. Test Objective
Demonstrate the ability of the autoclave to control temperature in all locations within specified acceptable range.
2. Scope
Validation will be conducted following the requirements specified in SOP-000601. One (1) run will be
performed for this equipment in order to provide evidence of temperature distribution.
3. Testing Prerequisites
• All personnel involved in the execution of this test procedure must be trained (i.e. applicable SOPs, validation
protocol, etc).
Program cycle parameters for this test are listed on Table 1 below:
6. Acceptance Criteria
• At least one TMD was placed adjacent to the control and/or drain probe.
• All TMDs remained within the Sterilization Band during the exposure phase.
• All TMDs meet an accumulated F0 of > 12 min during the exposure phase.
• All TMDs remained within 2°C of each other during the exposure phase.
• The theoretical temperature, based on the pressure of the system, at each time point must be within ± 2°C of
the measured temperature at each location in the autoclave.
12.8.1 Field Execution - Autoclave Sterilization (Empty Chamber) - TMDs Setup (IOQ - AUT-10202-CAM-03-17)
Comments
# Comments: Performed By Date
1 The date format in the Belimed autoclave Batch Reports is dd/mm/yyyy. Coane, John 12-Mar-2020 (UTC)
2 N/A Coane, John 12-Mar-2020 (UTC)
3 N/A Coane, John 12-Mar-2020 (UTC)
Note: If there are no comments in the "Comments" table above, type "No Comments" in the first line. The remaining empty rows will be considered
"N/A". Otherwise, "N/A" all unused rows.
12.8.2 Field Execution - Autoclave Sterilization (Empty Chamber) - Test Run (IOQ - AUT-10202-CAM-03-17)
Table 2: Cycle Test
# Procedure Expected Result Actual Result Attachment Pass / Fail Performed By Date
1 Load the autoclave sterilization Cycle program Wrapped Goods Cycle program Wrapped Goods N/A Pass Coane, John 03-Mar-2020
program for Wrapped Goods version #5 is loaded. version #5 is loaded. (UTC)
version #5.
2 Record the exposure Wrapped Goods cycle sterilization 124°C (2242 mbar) See steam N/A Pass Coane, John 13-Mar-2020
temperature to be used for this temperature is recorded. table in Section 16 (UTC)
cycle.
3 Record the exposure time to be Wrapped Goods cycle sterilization 1800 seconds (30 minutes) N/A Pass Coane, John 03-Mar-2020
used for this cycle. time is recorded. (UTC)
4 Start the equipment cycle and Cycle started and the date/time are Cycle started on 05Feb2020 at N/A Pass Coane, John 03-Mar-2020
simultaneously start the Kaye recorded. 1609. (UTC)
validator. Record the date / time
the cycle was started.
Table 2: Cycle Test
# Procedure Expected Result Actual Result Attachment Pass / Fail Performed By Date
5 Record the start date/time of Exposure cycle started and its date / 05 Feb 20 17:13:30 N/A Pass Coane, John 03-Mar-2020
the exposure cycle. time are recorded. (UTC)
6 Record the end date/time of the Exposure cycle completed and its 05 Feb 20 17:43:30 N/A Pass Coane, John 03-Mar-2020
exposure cycle. date / time are recorded. (UTC)
7 Record the equipment cycle end Equipment cycle end date / time are Cycle ended on 05Feb2020 at N/A Pass Coane, John 03-Mar-2020
date / time recorded. 1758. (UTC)
8 Ensure that the equipment cycle Cycle completed without faults or Cycle completed with no faults nor N/A Pass Coane, John 03-Mar-2020
completed as required (no faults alarms. alarms occurred. (UTC)
or alarms)
Comments
# Comments: Performed By Date
1 No comments Coane, John 03-Mar-2020
(UTC)
2
3
Note: If there are no comments in the "Comments" table above, type "No Comments" in the first line. The remaining empty rows will be considered
"N/A". Otherwise, "N/A" all unused rows.
12.8.3 Field Execution - Autoclave Sterilization (Empty Chamber) - Test Results (IOQ - AUT-10202-CAM-03-17)
5 At least one TMD was placed adjacent to Record the TMD placed next to the TC #04 was placed next to Pass Coane, John 06-Mar-2020 (UTC)
the control probe. control probe. the control probe.
6 At least one TMD was placed in the drain. Record the TMD placed in the drain. TC #05 placed in the drain. Pass Coane, John 06-Mar-2020 (UTC)
7 Review the attached data from the TMDs. All TMDs > 121.1°C All TMDs in autoclave> Pass Coane, John 06-Mar-2020 (UTC)
Comments
# Comments: Performed By Date
1 Note the first line of post-treatment phase in the Belimed batch report in line 1, table 4 is a part of the sterilization phase. Coane, John 06-Mar-2020
(UTC)
2 The date format in the Belimed autoclave Batch Reports is dd/mm/yyyy. Coane, John 12-Mar-2020
(UTC)
3 N/A Coane, John 06-Mar-2020
(UTC)
Note: If there are no comments in the "Comments" table above, type "No Comments" in the first line. The remaining empty rows will be considered
"N/A". Otherwise, "N/A" all unused rows.
1. Test Objective
Provide evidence that the system accessibility is limited and controlled and that the functionality is accessible with the proper authorization level.
2. Scope
All user security levels listed in Table 1 below. One representative user account from each security level has been chosen to be tested in this protocol.
Each user account password will be verified to be correct. Each user account will be verified to have the correct permissions and restrictions listed in
Table 2. These user accounts shall be created prior to test execution per system operating instructions and removed following test completion.
Page 156 of 196 01-Mar-2023 (UTC)
Document Number: IOQ - AUT-10202-CAM-03
Document Version: 1.0
Equipment ID: AUT-10202
Document Name: Installation and Operational Qualification Protocol for AUT-10202
3. Acceptance Criteria
• Each user could only access system functions that were specific to their user access level.
• The system prevented access to a user account when incorrect login credentials were entered.
• The system reverted to its predefined default access after a predetermined lockout period.
Procedure:
1. Create user accounts listed in Table 1 per operating instructions in section 9.7.
2. For each user account listed in Table 1, enter the default password and verify that access to the account is granted.
3. For each user account, enter at least three incorrect passwords and verify that access to the account is denied.
Page 159 of 196 01-Mar-2023 (UTC)
Document Number: IOQ - AUT-10202-CAM-03
Document Version: 1.0
Equipment ID: AUT-10202
Document Name: Installation and Operational Qualification Protocol for AUT-10202
4. For each user account, verify that the correct permissions and restrictions, listed in Table 2, are applied based on the security level specified
in Table 1.
5. For each user account, verify that the system automatically logs out and reverts to the Default user after a predetermined amount of time.
6. Following completion of Access Rights Testing, remove all test IDs below. Refer to operating instructions in section 9.7
Comments
# Comments: Performed By Date
1 No Comments Coane, John 06-Feb-2020
(UTC)
2
3
Note: If there are no comments in the "Comments" table above, type "No Comments" in the first line. The remaining empty rows will be considered
"N/A". Otherwise, "N/A" all unused rows.
1. Test Objective
Note: Steam Quality Testing for this unit has previously been completed by an outside vendor with a Brammer Bio representative present. The vendor's
test report will be attached to this test case to support that all acceptance criteria were met.
2. Scope
Steam quality testing of all areas covered by System # AUT-10202 will be verified in this test case.
3. Acceptance Criteria
• The total non-condensable gases in the steam must not exceed 3.5%
Procedure:
Comments
# Comments: Performed by Date
1 See Section 12.1.2 for calibration certificate for the temperature sensor associated with the steam quality testing. Coane, John 11-Mar-2020 (UTC)
2 N/A Coane, John 11-Mar-2020 (UTC)
3 N/A Coane, John 11-Mar-2020 (UTC)
Note: If there are no comments in the "Comments" table above, type "No Comments" in the first line. The remaining empty rows will be considered
"N/A". Otherwise, "N/A" all unused rows.
1. Test Objective
Demonstrate that the quantity of air leakage into the autoclave chamber during periods of vacuum does not exceed a level that will inhibit the penetration
of steam into the load and will not be a potential cause of contamination to the load during drying.
2. Scope
This test case will cover the leak test verification by Autoclave # AUT-10202 using Autoclave Cycle Leak Test.
4. Acceptance Criteria
• A leak test is executed successfully and the rate of pressure rise did not exceed 1.3 mbar/min.
Comments
# Comments: Recorded By Date
1 The date format in the Belimed autoclave Batch Reports is dd/mm/yyyy. Coane, John 12-Mar-2020
(UTC)
2 N/A Coane, John 12-Mar-2020
(UTC)
3 N/A Coane, John 12-Mar-2020
(UTC)
Note: If there are no comments in the "Comments" table above, type "No Comments" in the first line. The remaining empty rows will be considered
"N/A". Otherwise, "N/A" all unused rows.
1. Test Objective
To demonstrate the successful air removal from a high vacuum porous load autoclave cycle, which will provide the saturated steam conditions required
to adequately sterilize the load items.
2. Scope
Air Removal Test for Autoclave # AUT-10202 using Autoclave Cycle 'Bowie Dick Test' will be covered by this test case.
5. Acceptance Criteria
• An operating cycle has been successfully performed and the indicator exhibits a uniform color change.
Comments
# Comments: Performed By Date
1 The date format in the Belimed autoclave Batch Reports is dd/mm/yyyy. Coane, John 12-Mar-2020
(UTC)
2 N/A Coane, John 12-Mar-2020
(UTC)
3 N/A Coane, John 12-Mar-2020
(UTC)
Note: If there are no comments in the "Comments" table above, type "No Comments" in the first line. The remaining empty rows will be considered
"N/A". Otherwise, "N/A" all unused rows.
Record all system instruments for AUT-10202 in Table 2 below. Record the test case(s) that each instrument was utilized in. Record all calibration
information and attach a copy of the calibration certificate. Verify that each system instrument was in a calibrated state for the duration of execution.
Comments
# Comments Performed By Date
1 No comments Coane, John 06-Mar-2020 (UTC)
2
3
Note: If there are no comments in the "Comments" table above, type "No Comments" in the first line. The remaining empty rows will be considered
"N/A". Otherwise, "N/A" all unused rows.
14 UR Traceability Matrix
Procedure
1. Record the details of the latest approved version of the User Requirement for the specified system in Table 1.
2. After execution is complete, indicate if each PPUR was properly verified and completed in the test specified. If "No", issue a protocol deviation.
4 3.1.17 Autoclave shall have, at a minimum, a Verified in commissioning protocol CTP-AUT- Yes Coane, John 03-Mar-2020 (UTC)
temperature sensor capable of measuring
5 3.1.18 Autoclave shall have a temperature sensor Verified in commissioning protocol CTP-AUT- Yes Coane, John 03-Mar-2020 (UTC)
capable of measuring the jacket 10202-CAM-01.
temperature.
6 3.1.19 Autoclave shall have a pressure sensor(s) Verified in commissioning protocol CTP-AUT- Yes Coane, John 03-Mar-2020 (UTC)
capable of measuring the chamber 10202-CAM-01.
pressure.
7 3.1.25 The autoclaves shall include a vacuum Verified in commissioning protocol CTP-AUT- Yes Coane, John 03-Mar-2020 (UTC)
pump for air removal and drying. 10202-CAM-01.
8 3.2.3 Autoclave shall be capable of sterilizing Verified in commissioning protocol CTP-AUT- Yes Coane, John 03-Mar-2020 (UTC)
liquids, porous and non-porous materials. 10202-CAM-01.
9 3.2.5 Autoclave shall be capable of achieving Verified in commissioning protocol CTP-AUT- Yes Coane, John 03-Mar-2020 (UTC)
and maintaining the user-defined 10202-CAM-02.
temperature setpoint.
10 3.2.6 The air filtration system shall be steamed Verified in commissioning protocol CTP-AUT- Yes Coane, John 03-Mar-2020 (UTC)
in place and capable of integrity testing. 10202-CAM-02.
11 3.2.14 Jacket temperature must be ≤ to the Verified in commissioning protocol CTP-AUT- Yes Coane, John 03-Mar-2020 (UTC)
chamber. 10202-CAM-02.
12 3.4.3 The control system shall control and 12.6 Yes Coane, John 03-Mar-2020 (UTC)
monitor the pressure to the user-defined
setpoint.
13 3.4.4 The control system shall control and 12.6 Yes Coane, John 03-Mar-2020 (UTC)
monitor the user-defined temperature
setpoint.
Note: The following PPURs have been omitted because they are out of scope for this IOQ protocol and are PQ test verifications only: 3.2.4, 3.2.12,
3.2.13, 3.2.15, 3.3.1, 3.3.2, 3.3.3,
15 Protocol Deviations
Use the table below to initiate a deviation. For each deviation, include a reference to the protocol location where the deviation occurred.
Protocol Deviation Log
# Protocol Deviation Test Case Name / Section Number Run Number Table Number / Line Number Performed By Date
1 IOQ - AUT-10202-CAM-03-DEV-01 Section 10: OQ Prerequisites N/A N/A Coane, John 06-Mar-2020 (UTC)
2 IOQ - AUT-10202-CAM-03-DEV-02 Set Point Verification / 12.4.1, 12.4.2 N/A Tables 1, 4, 5, and 8 Coane, John 06-Mar-2020 (UTC)
3 IOQ - AUT-10202-CAM-03-DEV-03 Section 6 N/A Table 2 Coane, John 11-Mar-2020 (UTC)
4 IOQ - AUT-10202-CAM-03-DEV-04 9.3.1 N/A Table 1 / Line 1 Coane, John 11-Mar-2020 (UTC)
5 N/A N/A N/A N/A Coane, John 11-Mar-2020 (UTC)
6 N/A N/A N/A N/A Coane, John 11-Mar-2020 (UTC)
7 N/A N/A N/A N/A Coane, John 11-Mar-2020 (UTC)
8 N/A N/A N/A N/A Coane, John 11-Mar-2020 (UTC)
9 N/A N/A N/A N/A Coane, John 11-Mar-2020 (UTC)
10 N/A N/A N/A N/A Coane, John 11-Mar-2020 (UTC)
11 N/A N/A N/A N/A Coane, John 11-Mar-2020 (UTC)
12 N/A N/A N/A N/A Coane, John 11-Mar-2020 (UTC)
13 N/A N/A N/A N/A Coane, John 11-Mar-2020 (UTC)
14 N/A N/A N/A N/A Coane, John 11-Mar-2020 (UTC)
15 N/A N/A N/A N/A Coane, John 11-Mar-2020 (UTC)
Note: If there are no Deviations in the table above, type "N/A" in the first line. The remaining empty rows will be considered "N/A". Otherwise, "N/A" all
unused rows.
Comments
# Comments Performed By Date
1 No comments Coane, John 11-Mar-2020 (UTC)
2
3
Note: If there are no comments in the "Comments" table above, type "No Comments" in the first line. The remaining empty rows will be considered
"N/A". Otherwise, "N/A" all unused rows
16 Attachments
Attachments Log
# Attachment Attachment Description Test Case Number Run Number Step Number Performed By Date
1 AUT-10202 AUT-10202 system component information in SAP 9.4.1 N/A N/A Coane, John 03-Mar-2020
Component SAP database. (UTC)
Information.pdf
2 Kaye Setup Kaye Setup Report 12.1.1 N/A N/A Coane, John 06-Mar-2020
Report.pdf (UTC)
3 Batch_0000230_2020 In-Line Sterilization was performed to support filter integrity 12.5.1 N/A Table 1, after Coane, John 12-Mar-2020
-02-28_15-21-51.pdf testing, Section 12.5.1. step 1 and prior (UTC)
to step 2
4 WGC Wrapped Goods batch report 12.5.1 N/A Table 1. after Coane, John 18-Mar-2020
Batch_0000229_2020 step 1 and prior (UTC)
-03-18_15-48-17.pdf to step 2
5 Belimed Steam This is the steam table used by the Belimed software and 12.8.2 N/A Table 2 Step 2 Coane, John 18-Mar-2020
Table_for AUT-10202 was used to develop the sterilization cycles. (UTC)
pressure
conversion.pdf
6 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Coane, John 06-Mar-2020
(UTC)
7 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Coane, John 06-Mar-2020
(UTC)
8 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Coane, John 06-Mar-2020
(UTC)
9 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Coane, John 06-Mar-2020
(UTC)
10 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Coane, John 06-Mar-2020
(UTC)
11 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Coane, John 06-Mar-2020
Attachments Log
# Attachment Attachment Description Test Case Number Run Number Step Number Performed By Date
(UTC)
Note: If there are no Attachments listed in the table above, type "N/A" in the first line. The remaining empty rows will be considered "N/A". Otherwise,
"N/A" all unused rows.
Comments
# Comments Performed By Date
1 The date format in the Belimed autoclave Batch Reports is dd/mm/yyyy. Coane, John 12-Mar-2020 (UTC)
2 N/A Coane, John 12-Mar-2020 (UTC)
3 N/A Coane, John 12-Mar-2020 (UTC)
Note: If there are no comments in the "Comments" table above, type "No Comments" in the first line. The remaining empty rows will be considered
"N/A". Otherwise, "N/A" all unused rows.