Manifestation
Manifestation
ROGELIO ITLANAS
Defendant .
x-------------------------------------------------/
MANIFESTATION
(Submission of Amended Verification )
Further, that in the complaint filed by the plaintiff, the counsel, Atty.
Gervoso notarized the verification and certification of non-forum
shopping which he himself is a party.
In the case of Ramos vs. Baldo (G.R. No. 199196, March 20,
2012) and Horca vs. People ( G. R. No. 224316, November 10,
2021) , the Supreme Court held that the plaintiff’s counsel
who prepared and signed the plaintiff’s complaint is
disqualified to notarize the verification and certification of
non-forum shopping pursuant to the 2004 Rules on Notarial
Practice. Under the said rule, a notary public is disqualified
from performing a notarial act if he/she is a party to the
instrument or document that is to be notarized.
2
Respectfully submitted.
By :
By:
Copy furnished :
Answer
Recovery of Ownership and
Possession with Damages
Heirs of Buenaventura Tanjay vs.
Rogelio Itlanas
3
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED.
And By :
MERCY G. DEDAL
Roll of Attorneys No. 82886
PTR No. 7230363 : October 3,2022, Mahaplag, Leyte
IBP No. 237341: October 4, 2022; Cebu Chapter
MCLE VIII
Admitted to the Bar May 31,2022.
EXPLANATION
Answer
Recovery of Ownership and
Possession with Damages
Heirs of Buenaventura Tanjay vs.
Rogelio Itlanas
4
Copy Furnished :
Answer
Recovery of Ownership and
Possession with Damages
Heirs of Buenaventura Tanjay vs.
Rogelio Itlanas