The Impact of Factory Closure On Local Communities
The Impact of Factory Closure On Local Communities
net/publication/238073656
CITATIONS READS
28 4,525
2 authors:
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by A. Murie on 16 January 2014.
ABSTRACT
There is a considerable recent literature concerned with the impacts of factory closure.
Much of this literature is based on closures in the 1980s and 1990s and on closures
affecting heavy industry – coal, steel and shipbuilding. It also tends to focus on
employment and labour market impacts assessed through the subsequent experience
of workers made redundant following closures and, perhaps justifiably, to assume that
the impacts are localized. Because of this much of the discussion of policy
implications relates to the workers made redundant and to a very local economy. This
paper refers to the closure of the MG Rover factory in Longbridge, Birmingham, UK.
This closure attracted considerable media and policy interest. It was regarded as
presenting a crisis for government and the local community. The paper responds to
arguments in the research literature and explores the spatial and economic impact of
the MG Rover closure in more detail. It complements other research which has
focused on the experience of those made redundant in 2005 by referring to the loss of
employment over a longer time period and identifying a wider impact spatially and
socially. The paper draws upon different sources of evidence and concludes with a
discussion of implications both for policy and research.
Note: The authors wish to acknowledge the support of the ESRC under award number RES-
000-22-2478.
1. INTRODUCTION
Plant closures were studied intensively in the 1970s and the 1980s. Pinch and Mason
(1991) argued that these studies were generally derived from a restricted geographical
base: they were mostly concerned with redundancies among manufacturing workers
in older industrial regions. In order to redress this geographical bias, Pinch and Mason
looked at two case studies in the South-East and showed that the impact of plant
closure redundancies in terms of rates of pay, working conditions and level of job
satisfaction differ in a more buoyant labour market.
More recent studies include Hinde (1994), Tomaney and al. (1997, 1999), Kirkham
and Watts (1998), Shutt and al. (2003), Henderson and Shutt (2004) and Pike (2002,
2005). These studies have followed two major research and theoretical strands
(Tomaney and al., 1999). The first looks at the plant closures themselves (origin,
closure proposal, response) with some particular emphasis on multi-plant closures.
The second looks at the aftermath of the closures and their impact on the local
economy and/or labour market. Because these two strands are rarely combined in the
literature Tomaney et al. (1999) and Pike (2005) called for a more holistic perspective
on closure. However a more holistic view would also need to address a further issue
which few of the existing studies engage with - the extent of the spatial and longer
term impacts of closure.
Existing studies of factory closure usually have a strong focus on the workers made
redundant and on their work trajectories but neglect the spatial or neighbourhood
impact and the effect on other workers and households living in the same areas as the
redundant workers. Hinde’s (1994) insightful study of the labour market experiences
of redundant workers over a 29 month period in Sunderland following the end of
shipbuilding in 1989 looked at placement rates, migration, job quality issues but only
considered the local economic environment as a factor affecting chances of
reemployment. His “paper raises issues for policy makers concerning those factors
associated with travel-to-work distances including migration option and the paucity
of local employment.” (Hinde, 1994, p. 713).
Tomaney et al. (1997; 1999) studied the case of Swan Hunter in Tyneside. Again,
their focus was on the shipbuilding industry and the work trajectory of redundant
workers. Their main findings were the following:
“Despite pronounced industrial decline, Wallsend remained, at the time of the
closure, a shipbuilding town. This factor played a critical role in shaping the post-
redundancy experience of the workforce. Although designers found their skills in
demand, new jobs were typically available in other regions of the UK or abroad.
For those with more traditional industrial skills there was less propensity to move,
but also limited chances of finding work in either the traditional or newer
industries in the locality. Those that found work generally found the terms and
conditions of employment were poorer than at Swan Hunter. There was a general
shift from permanent to temporary forms of employment and a concomitant
reduction in average earnings. The local economy suffered from the negative
multipliers generated by irregular and insecure work and reduced income.”
(Tomaney and al., 1997, p. 410)
Shutt et al. (2003) and Henderson and Shutt (2004) adopted a wider perspective when
looking at the Selby coalfield closure in Yorkshire and Humber in 2002. Their papers
look at the causal factors behind the closure, the regional impact and the regeneration
needs arising as well as the holistic approach adopted in the policy response. This
more holistic approach was taken into consideration because “past regeneration
experience suggests that socially related problems occur 18 months to two years after
mining ceasing.” (Henderson and Shutt, 2004, p. 34). Their analysis of the regional
impact was however limited and did not provide a detailed account of the spatial and
long term impact of closure. Their findings demonstrate a rapid and coordinated
response from the Task Force put in place. “However, inevitably the focus has been
on short-term responses linked to the immediate ‘needs’ of the miners. As with
previous regeneration, much will depend on how longer-term opportunities develop to
shift the economy of the affected areas and how the communities involved
responded.” (Henderson and Shutt, 2004, p. 36)
Finally, Pike (2005), referring to the closure of an R&D company in the North East in
1998, called for “building a Geographical Political Economy of Closure”, looking
more broadly at the “social process of production that unfolds over time, across space
and in place referring to path dependence process. His paper, however, does not detail
the spatial and long term impact.
Building on Pinch and Mason (1991) and the recent call for a more holistic approach
to plant closure, this paper explores the spatial and economic impact of the MG Rover
closure at Longbridge over time from 1998 to 2007. The failure of MG Rover in
Longbridge represents the largest corporate closure (loss of 6,000 jobs) in Britain
since that of British Steel at Shotton in 1980. It is one of a number of major closures
in the automotive sector occurring in Britain in recent years: Ford in Dagenham
(1,100 jobs) and Vauxhall in Luton (1,900) in 2002, Jaguar in Coventry (2,200 jobs)
in 2004, and most recently (2007) Peugeot in Ryton, Coventry (2,300 jobs). This
paper adds a more recent example of factory closure and refers to a different industry
and region than much of the existing literature. The data used also enable analysis of
the geography of the impact of closure and questions the implicit or, at times explicit,
assumption that impacts are highly localized. The paper draws on new research which
has included analysis of the places of residence of MG Rover workers, use of census
data and local employment data as well as published material related to the closure.
Initially the paper reviews the nature of the evidence produced so far on the impact of
the MG Rover closure. Section three sketches the data and methodology used to
produce the revised evidence of the long term spatial and economic impact presented
in sections 4 and 5. Section 6 concludes and discusses the policy implications of these
findings.
Given the large number of redundancies and the iconic symbol that MG Rover
represented for the UK automotive industry, various reports have presented a short
term evaluation of the direct policy response following the closure and of its impact
on workers (RC 2005a and 2005b, RTF 2005 and 2006, NAO, 2006, Amicus, 2006;
Armstrong, 2006; House of Commons, 2006 and 2007). These are valuable reports
but are marked by a number of limitations, including: the fact that they have a short
term focus on the situation immediately before closure and on the impacts since; they
concentrate on the workers made redundant and their experience in finding
employment as well as the impact on businesses in the supply chain linked to
production at the Longbridge works; and they mostly consider the impact on the
immediate locality – the Longbridge ward and adjacent wards within the city of
Birmingham. Any evaluation of the impact of the closure of the Longbridge works
should include these elements but a more detailed and comprehensive approach would
go beyond this. In particular, it would need to: take account of the major job losses
from Longbridge that had occurred in the period 1998 to 2005; to adopt an evidence
based approach to spatial impact; and finally to consider data related to local
employment and unemployment. Rather than focusing on redundant workers alone
this would raise questions about displacement and wider employment effects. The
remainder of this paper focuses on these issues.
In addressing the above issues, we use three major datasets to document the long term
impact of the closure of MG Rover works at Longbridge. First, we use the payroll
dataset of employees at MG Rover at two points in time (1998 and 2005) to analyse
the extent of the spatial impact of the closure of MG Rover works. Both datasets
provide postcodes for the home addresses of most of MG Rover’s employees working
at Longbridge at these two points in time. We have been able to map these data in
detail. The 1998 dataset also comprises information on age, general type of
occupation for each employee (executive, hourly workers, managerial staff, general
staff and trainees). Second, in order to estimate the economic impact of the closure
over the longer term, we analysed the monthly claimant count database for claimants
of unemployment related benefits. These are currently the Jobseeker’s Allowance
(JSA) and National Insurance (NI) unemployment credits. Unemployment related
benefit claimants do not exactly correspond to unemployment as defined by the
International Labour Organization i . For example, on the one hand claimant counts
exclude unemployed people who do not claim or are not eligible for benefits, whilst
on the other they include inactive claimants and some employed claimants. That is
why the two measures of unemployment are not comparable. Usually the claimant
count data is less accurate than other measures of unemployment (ONS, 2006).
However, claimant counts can be more reliable at sub-regional level than estimates of
unemployment from the Labour Force Survey given the larger numbers involved.
Claimant count data have been available at ward level since 1996. In addition,
analysis of the claimant count is available in some detail. For example, analysis of
claimants by age, duration of claim and occupation has been available since 2004. We
use these data to estimate the long term economic impact of the closure of the MG
Rover works. Finally, we complement these two datasets with data from the census
2001 and the Annual Business Inquiry 2005 at ward level.
[INSERT TABLE 1]
To get a better idea of the relative importance of the impact of the closure on each
neighborhood and locality, we compared the size of the MG Rover workforce with the
number of 16 to 74 year old employed people in each area as the time of the Census in
2001. This is an imperfect comparison because the Census took place in between the
two comparative dates but it gives an idea of the extent of the impact at ward level. In
1998, the MG Rover workforce represented 1.6% of Birmingham’s employed
workforce and 0.5% of the region’s workforce. This figure rose to 3.6% in
Bromsgrove. At ward level within Birmingham it represented 4% of the workforce in
Weoley and 9.7% in Longbridge. These figures increase significantly if we only look
at the workforce employed in manufacturing. MG Rover employees represented
around 50% of the workforce employed in manufacturing in Longbridge, 40% in
Northfield, 30% in Weoley and 20% in Kings Norton, Bartley Green and
Bromsgrove. These absolute and relative figures suggest that the closure has had a
long term and sustained impact in a wide area in and around Birmingham.
Data on MG Rover employees can be disaggregated by types of job for 1998. Hourly
workers (74%), general staff (14.8%) and management staff (8.8%) formed the three
main categories of the MG Rover workforce. The majority of MG Rover’s hourly
workers mostly lived in Birmingham (50%), Dudley (15%) and Sandwell (10%). In
contrast, executive staff were more dispersed with only 20% of them living in
Birmingham, Dudley and Bromsgrove. More than half of the management staff also
lived outside these three districts. The pattern for general staff lies between these two
extremes and involves a more even distribution regionally: 40% of them lived in
Birmingham, 17% in Bromsgrove, 9% in Dudley and 30% were dispersed across the
rest of the West Midlands. This demonstrates that the impact of closure on local
labour markets is uneven.
One could assume that the concentration effect has reduced over time. However, the
concentration was never as large as could be anticipated. A survey of methods of
travel by employees at Longbridge works and another factory at Castle Bromwich (to
the north-east of Birmingham) showed that in 1937 only 10% were walking to work.
Many more were travelling by train, bus or coach (33.5%), private car or motorcycle
(16%) and bicycle (13.5%) (Smith, 1989). This already suggests a wide geographical
spread of employees, even over 70 years ago. In 2001, around 60% of all commuters
used a private vehicle to go to work in the South West of Birmingham; this was
roughly equal to the City’s average but was inferior to the regional average (68.1%).
In Dudley and Bromsgrove, these figures rose to more than 70% of all commuters.
The proximity of the Longbridge works to the motorway and major road networks
around Birmingham and to the south probably made this effect much stronger than
was the case with some other employers. It seems likely that compared with miners or
steelworkers in other cities, car workers at Longbridge were widely scattered across
the sub-region. They were not concentrated in particular neighbourhoods and because
of their relatively high incomes they were in a mixture of positions in the housing
market. While some were in the rented sector, the majority of skilled and better paid
workers were owner occupiers and it is apparent that they had traded up and moved
further away from original locations near to the factory.
These changes underlie the evidence that the concentrated neighbourhood impact of
closure in 2005 was initially less than anticipated. Even if the local economy was
sufficiently depressed and the employability of the workers was sufficiently low that
they were unlikely to get other employment, the place effects would not be as strong
as might initially have been expected.
Figures from the Census 2001, from the Annual Population Survey and from the
Annual Business Inquiry showed that Longbridge, Northfield, Bromsgrove, Dudley
and Birmingham display different economic and social characteristics and are
different types of neighborhouds. On one side, Longbridge displays the profile of a
‘working class’ neighborhood whereas on the other side Bromsgrove looks like a
‘middle class’ town. Dudley and Northfield are somewhere in the middle of these two
profiles. Longbridge and Birmingham as a whole have slightly lower levels of
employment compared with Northfield, Dudley and Bromsgrove. When compared
with the City of Birmingham as a whole and the national average, occupations in
Longbridge are biased toward elementary occupations, skilled trades, process plant
and machine operatives as well as personal services. In contrast a higher proportion of
Bromsgrove residents work in managerial and professional occupations than applies
nationally. The Northfield labour force is characterized by higher level of workers in
administrative and secretarial occupations, skilled trades and process plant and
machine operatives. Finally, Dudley displays a mixed pattern, with a higher
proportion of its labour force in managerial occupations as well as skilled trades and
as process plant and machine operatives. In terms of economic activities, Longbridge
again displays a different profile compared with the other areas. An important amount
of its economic activities are in the manufacturing sector (38.1%) compared with the
City average (12.4%). Consequently, the level of service activities is lower. In
addition service employment is mostly concentrated in public administration,
education and health. Dudley retains a strong manufacturing sector (16.4% of all
economic activities) whereas Northfield and Bromsgrove have around 90% of their
economic activities in the service sectors.
Mobility varies across the five areas. A higher proportion of residents from Dudley,
Longbridge and Northfield travelled more than 5 km to go to work compared with
Birmingham as a whole and with Bromsgrove. However, more people travelled by
public transportation (reflecting the City average) in Longbridge and Northfield than
in the two adjacent districts of Dudley and Bromsgrove.
Finally, using to the 2004 Indices of Deprivation (DCLG, 2004), Birmingham was
ranked 15th most deprived out of the 354 Local Authorities in England, although in
the West Midlands it was the most deprived Local Authority area (just ahead of
Sandwell which was ranked 16th). By comparison, Dudley was ranked 109th and
Bromsgrove 293rd. Although most of the most deprived areas in Birmingham were
located around the City Centre, Longbridge - and to a lesser extent Northfield - also
contained such areas.
In summary, the various areas that had significant numbers of residents who lost their
jobs at the MG Rover works had significantly different social profiles. There were
unequal impacts on an uneven surface. Following from this, our analysis aims to
explore differences that emerge from the interrogation of employment data. Because
of the nature of these data we regard this part of the analysis as raising questions
rather than providing definitive findings.
Although there had been the loss of some 10,000 jobs at MG Rover between 1998 and
2005, these areas had seen a declining rate of unemployment over the previous 15
years (Figure 1). They seem to have successfully absorbed the increased labour supply
associated with MG Rover ‘s decline over that period.
[INSERT FIGURE 1]
The closure of MG Rover marks a clear break in that trend with an important increase
in the numbers of jobs seekers allowance claimants in most areas in May 2005
(Figures 1 and 2). There is a clear increase of the number of JSA claimants from April
to May in all our 5 areas compared with the national average. For example, JSA
claimants as a proportion of the working age resident population increased from 4.4%
to 7% in Longbridge; from 3.6% to 5.7% in Northfield; and from 1.6% to 2.8% in
Bromsgrove (Figure 2). However, this rate subsequently decreased in these 3 areas
until November 2005. It then started increasing again, this time associated with an
increase nationally. These two blows to the economy have meant that JSA claimant
rates had not fallen back to their 2005 levels by April 2007, two years after the closure
of MG Rover (Figure 2). It seems that the macro-level national increase in the levels
of unemployment was detrimental to the chances of MG Rover employees finding
new jobs. This effect is more important in Longbridge and Northfield than in
Bromsgrove. The impact seems to have been less important in Dudley where the rate
of JSA Claimants as a proportion of the working age resident population only
increased slightly (from 2.9% to 3.2%) in the period April to May 2005; although the
fact that it only started decreasing in October 2006 suggests that it was more
persistent.
[INSERT FIGURE 2]
These variations can be linked with the usual occupation of claimants in each area
over that period (Figures 3 to 6). After a sharp increase in the levels of JSA Claimant
for most of the types of occupation from April to May 2005, the numbers of claimants
in managerial and professional occupations, skilled trades and process, plant and
machine operatives rapidly decreased towards their initial levels in Longbridge,
Northfield and Bromsgrove (Figures 3, 4 and 5). Although the number of claimants in
these occupations increased again in later 2005 in line with the national increase, they
were almost back to their original levels by April 2007. In contrast, the levels of
claimants in sales and customer service, administrative and secretarial and elementary
occupations did not decrease significantly and/or increased or remained constant over
the period. This pattern is slightly different in Northfield where the number of
claimants in administrative and secretarial occupations decreased over the period
(Figure 4). Again in Dudley trends were slightly different with an increase in most
occupational groups of claimants and a tendency to remain constant afterwards
(Figure 6). One of the findings of previous reports on the work trajectories of ex-MG
Rover workers is that 50% of them find work where they were earning a lot less than
at MG Rover (Armstrong, 2006). We also know that some of them changed
occupations with their new job (RTF, 2006; House of Common, 2007). We can
suppose that some ex-MG Rover workers may have had a competitive advantage over
other unemployed workers in these occupations, creating some difficulties for non-
MG Rover workers in finding work.
[INSERT FIGURES 3 TO 6]
Figure 7 presents data for people who have been JSA claimants for over 12 months
for our 5 areas and Great Britain. We can see that these rates decreased sharply in
April to July 2005. This is explained by the increase in new claimants in each area due
to the MG Rover closure. However, instead of going back to their levels of 2005 a
year after the closure, we observed a sharp increase in the proportion of over 12
months JSA claimants in all areas. For example, from April 2005 to April 2007, these
proportions increased from 16.6% to 25.8% in Longbridge; from 17.2% to 24% in
Northfield; from 10.3% to 16.3% in Bromsgrove; and from and from 16.2% to 24.7%
in Dudley. This seems to reflect the difficulty that an important proportion of
claimants experienced in finding employment over that period – partly reflecting a
rising proportion of long term claimants nationally. However, the increasing
difference between the areas referred to above can not be explained by this and
appears strange in view of the record of former MG Rover employees obtaining work.
[INSERT FIGURE 7]
In conclusion, our data suggest that even though a majority of MG Rover workers
were back in work a year after the MG Rover closure, the activity in the labour market
of our five impact areas was not back to normal in April 2007, some two years after
the closure. This is due in part by a national decrease in employment in late 2005.
However, our data also suggest a long term unemployment trend for residents in areas
where former MG Rover workers live. It seems likely that some of these are former
MG Rover workers but that there may also be a displacement of less qualified
workers in each area and an increase in long term unemployment experienced by
other workers due to the impact of more qualified MG Rover workers entering the
labour market. Finally, we observed spatial variations in our findings with Dudley
showing more persistent rising levels of unemployment over the longer term.
This paper has provided a detailed discussion of new data related to a major factory
closure. This is a closure taking place at a later stage than those discussed in much of
the literature. This is also a closure related to the motor industry and to a factory
located on the edge of a city and particularly well served by main roads and
motorways. Our findings suggest that the spatial impact of the MG Rover closure has
been much wider that could have been expected 20 or more years ago. In effect, the
development of longer distance commuting and the restructuring of the housing
market over recent years has meant that the impact of the MG Rover closure has been
relocated and dispersed compared with what it would have been in the past. The
social pattern will not have changed with the impact being experienced most severely
by lower paid workers with less employability and by older workers who will find it
more difficult to obtain jobs in the future.
The conclusions from this are that we should be very cautious about dramatising a
very localised neighbourhood effect of a major factory closure. In a period of relative
prosperity and in a period where workforces are relatively dispersed, associated with
travel to work by motor car, the impacts will not be as concentrated as in the past.
However, we should not swing to the opposite extreme and imply that there is no
neighbourhood effect. The evidence points to a wider zone experiencing a relatively
concentrated impact. This indicates a dispersal of the economic impact of the closure
compared with the past and some other closures, but does not deny that a spatial
concentration remains. In addition, two years after the closure, even though most MG
Rover workers are recorded as having found new jobs within a year of the closure,
levels of long term unemployment are not still back to their initial levels.
These findings suggest that there are ‘second wave’ effects from factory closures not
picked up by methodologies that focus on short term impacts or that are wholly
focused on tracking individual redundant workers. Whether ex-MG Rover workers
stay in their new jobs or whether their availability for work affects the employment of
others is difficult to identify. However, recent interviews with local policy makers in
Longbridge and Northfield alluded to a number of ex-MG Rover workers remaining
in long term unemployment due to difficulties over re-entering the labour market, or
being in and out of employment because the job they found was unsatisfactory, as
well as to ex-workers facing significant mental health problems. It is also evident that
other members of the household from the ex-MG Rover workers have in some cases
made major changes in their work and living patterns. This includes partners who
previously did not work but now do and children whose decisions about education and
work have been affected. These interviews also indicated increased difficulties in
finding new employment among people who were already unemployed because of the
competition generated by the arrival on the market of ex-MG Rover workers. The
pattern of impact is also not easy to read off directly from the workforce as this does
not include those working in service and other sectors which are affected by the
spending power of MG Rover workers. All these elements suggest that there are
broader economic impacts on local communities than those accounted in many studies
on closure. Future research concerned with spatial as well as other impacts of factory
closure should explore these issues as well as the relationship between place of
residence and the location of the factory that has closed.
As well as having implications for research designed to inform policy these findings
have direct implications for policy. These include the need for a broader agenda of
coordination and regeneration to counterbalance the aftermath of closure in the longer
term. Richard Burden, Member of the Parliament for the Northfield area expressed
this concern in the House of Commons report on the closure of MG MG Rover (2007,
p. Ev12, Q.47):
“(…) there is also a long term problem in that area and there are people who
are out of work in that area or who have got skills problems in that area or
who did not work for MG MG Rover. The family links mean that we need
to have a much broader perspective about trying to raise skill levels,
aspiration levels and provide help in that part of Birmingham, and I would
say north Worcestershire as well, not simply to those who were MG MG
Rover workers, even though they will be a key part of that.”
Regeneration has usually been included in the remit of task forces addressing the
consequences of closures in other parts of England (Pike, 2005; Shelby and al, 2002).
In 2000, the first MG Rover Task Force had a regeneration focus, which was
subsequently taken forward by Advantage West Midlands in its new regional
development strategy (RTF, 2005; Bailey 2003) ii . However, most of these
programmes have been targeted primarily at ex-MG Rover workers. Our results
suggest that the impact of the closure may have had a broader impact on less qualified
workers in the affected local communities and beyond Longbridge and Northfield.
Targeting programmes specifically at redundant workers may reinforce this effect.
Table 1: Place of Residence of Rover Employees in 1998 and 2005.
1998 2005
4000 60,000
Longbridge
Northfield
3500 Bromsgrove
Birmingham
50,000
Dudley
3000
40,000
2500
2000 30,000
1500
20,000
1000
10,000
500
0 0
94
95
96
97
98
99
00
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
93
96
98
99
00
01
02
03
04
05
06
99
99
99
19
19
19
19
19
19
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
19
19
19
19
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
t1
t1
t1
ry
ry
ry
ry
ry
ry
ry
ry
ry
ry
ry
ry
ry
ry
Fe st
Fe st
Fe st
Fe st
Fe st
Fe st
Fe st
Fe st
Fe st
Fe st
Fe st
us
us
s
ua
ua
ua
ua
ua
ua
ua
ua
ua
ua
ua
ua
ua
ua
u
gu
gu
gu
gu
gu
gu
ug
ug
ug
ug
ug
ug
ug
ug
Au
Au
Au
Au
br
Au
br
br
br
br
Au
br
br
br
br
br
br
br
br
br
A
A
Fe
Fe
Fe
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
7.0
8.0
Fe ary nu
04
br 2 Fe ary
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
Ju
ua 00 br 2
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
ry 5 ua 00 ne
M ry 5 20
Figure 4
Figure 3
Figure 2
20
ar 05 M 20 A 04
ch ar 05 ug
20 ch us
A 20 t2
pr 05 A O 00
il pr 05 4
2 il ct
M 00 2 ob
M 00 er
ay 5
ay 5 D 20
Ju 200
ec
Ju 200 em 04
ne 5 ne 5
2 be
Ju 005 2 r2
Ju 005 Fe 00
Au ly 2 A ly br 4
Se gu 00 S ug 200 ua
pt st 5 ep us ry
em 2 te t 2 5 20
m
b 005 b 00 05
O er 2 O er 5 Ap
ct 00 c 2 ril
N ob 5 N tob 005 20
ov er ov er
em 20 em 2 05
D b 0 D 0 Ju
ec er 5 ec ber 05 ne
em 20 em 20 20
be 05 b 05 Au 05
Ja r Ja er 2 gu
nu 200 nu 00 st
Fe ary 5 Fe ary 5 20
br 2 br 2 O 05
ua 00 ua 00 ct
ry 6
ob
ry 6 er
M 20 M 20 D 20
ar 06 ar 06 ec
ch ch em 05
20
A
20 A be
pr 06 pr 06 r2
il il
2 2 Fe 00
M 00 br 5
M 00 ay 6 ua
ay 6 ry
Ju 200 20
Ju 200 ne 6
ne 6 06
2 A
2 Ju 006 pr
Ju 006
A ly il
A ly 2 20
S ug 200 06
S ugu 00 ep us
ep s 6 te t 2 6 Ju
m
- April 2004 to April 2007.
te t 2 ne
m b 00 20
b 006 O er 2 6
O er 2 c 00 A 06
N tob ug
ct 00 6 us
N ob 6
ov er
20 07
07 Ap
ril
20
07
Proportion of Job Seekers Allowance Claimants on Working Age Resident Population
Job Seekers Allowance Claimants by Occupation - Northfield Ward - January 2005 to March 2007.
Job Seekers Allowance Claimants by Occupation - Longbridge Ward - January 2005 to March 2007.
Technical
Sales and
Service
Service
Managers,
Secretarial
Operatives
Elementary
Personal
Dudley
Customer
Sales and
and Machine
Managers,
Operatives
Elementary
Skilled Trades
Process, Plant
Northfield
Professional
and Machine
and Technical
Professional and
Administrative
Skilled Trades
Personal Service
Longbridge
Process, Plant
Birmingham
Bromsgrove
and Secretarial
Customer Service
Great Britain
Administrative and
Ja Claimants
Rate (% of all JSA Claimants) nu
Fe ary Ja
br 2 nu
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
Ap
ril ua 00 Fe ary
20 ry 5 2
0.0%
5.0%
10.0%
15.0%
20.0%
25.0%
30.0%
35.0%
br
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
04 M 20 ua 00
Ju ar 05 ry 5
ch
ne M 20
Figure 7
Figure 6
Figure 5
20 ar
20 A ch
05
Au 04 pr 05
il 20
gu 2 A
st M 00 pr 05
ay 5 il
O
20 2
ct 04 Ju 200 M 00
ob ne 5 ay 5
D
er 2 Ju 200
ec 200 Ju 005 ne 5
em 4 A ly 2
be S ug 200 Ju 005
r2 ep us 5 A ly
te t 2
Fe 00 m S ug 200
br 4 b 00 ep us 5
ua te t 2
O er 2 5
ct m
ry
N ob
00 b 00
20 ov er 5 O er 2 5
05 em 2 ct 00
Ap D 00 N ob 5
ec ber 5 ov er
ril em 2
em 20 00
20 D
05 b 05 ec ber 5
Ju Ja er 2 em 20
ne nu 00 b 05
20 Fe ary 5 Ja er 2
A 05 br 2 nu 00
ug ua 00 Fe ary 5
us ry 6 br 2
t2 M 20 ua 00
O 00 ar 06 ry 6
ct 5 ch
M 20
ob 20 ar
er A ch
06
D 20 pr 06
ec il 20
em 05 2 A
M 00 pr 06
be ay 6 il
2
r2
Ju 200 M 00
Fe 00 ay 6
br 5 ne 6
ua 2 Ju 200
ry Ju 006 ne 6
20 A ly 2
06 S ug 200 Ju 006
Ap ep us 6 A ly
te t 2
ril m S ug 200
20 b 00 ep us 6
te t 2
06 O er 2 6 m
Ju ct 0 b 00
ne N ob 06
O er 2 6
ov er
20 em 2 ct 0
00 N ob 06
A 06 D ov er
ug ec ber 6 em 2
us em 20 D 00
t2 b 06 ec ber 6
O 0 06 Ja er 2 em 20
ct
ob nu 00 b 06
er Fe ary 6 Ja er 2
D 20 br 2 nu 00
ec ua 00 Fe ary 6
em 06
ry 7 br 2
Service
Technical
Managers,
Secretarial
Machine
Elementary
Technical
Sales and
Managers,
Secretarial
Operatives
Elementary
Skilled Trades
Skilled Trades
Professional and
Personal Service
Dudley
Administrative and
Personal Service
Northfield
Machine Operatives
Customer Service
Longbridge
Birmingham
Bromsgrove
Great Britain
REFERENCES
AMICUS THE UNION, 2006. MG Rover Survey Report. London.
ARMSTRONG, K., 2006. Life after MG Rover. The impact of the closure on the
workers, their families and the community. A report prepared for BBC Radio 4. The
Work Foundation.
BAILEY, D., 2003. Globalisation, regions and cluster policies: the case of the MG
Rover Task Force. Policy Studies, 24 (2/3), 67-85.
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITIES AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT (DCLG),
2004. Indices of deprivation. Available from:
http://www.communities.gov.uk/index.asp?id=1128440 [accessed 31st of May 2007]
HENDERSON, R. and SHUTT, J., 2004. Responding to a coalfield closure: old issues
for a new regional development agency? Local Economy, 19 (1), 25-37.
HINDE, K., 1994. Labour market experiences following plant closures: the case of
Sunderland’s shipyard workers. Regional Studies, 28, 713-724.
HOUSE OF COMMONS., 2006. The closure of MG Rover. Fifty seventh report of
session 2005-2006. Report together with formal minutes, oral and written evidence.
Committee of Public Accounts. Ordered by the House of Commons. London: The
Stationery Office.
HOUSE OF COMMONS. TRADE AND INDUSTRY COMMITTEE, 2007. Success
and failure in the UK car manufacturing industry. Fourth Report of Session 2006-07.
Report together with formal minutes, oral and written evidence. HC399. London: The
Stationery Office.
KIRKHAM, J. and WATTS, H., 1998. Multi-locational manufacturing organisations
and plant closures in urban areas. Urban Studies, 35 (9), 1559-1575.
MG ROVER TASK FORCE (RTF), 2005. Six month on. Prepared for submission to
the Department of Trade and Industry.
MG ROVER TASK FORCE (RTF), 2006. Final update report: the work goes on.
Prepared for submission to the Department of Trade and Industry.
NATIONAL AUDIT OFFICE (NAO), 2006. The closure of MG Rover. Ordered by
the House of Common.
O’FARRELL, N. and CROUCHLEY, P., 1983. Industrial closures in Ireland 1973–
1981: analysis and implications. Regional Studies, 17, 411-427.
OFFICE OF NATIONAL STATISTICS (ONS), 2006. How exactly is employment
measured? Available from:
http://www.statistics.gov.uk/downloads/theme_labour/employment.pdf [accessed 31st
of May 2007]
PIKE, A., 2002. Task force and the organisation of economic development: the case
of the North East Region of England. Discussion Paper 02/3. Centre for Urban and
Regional Development Studies, University of Newcastle Upon Tyne.
PIKE, A., 2005. Building a geographical political economy of closure: the case of
R&DCo in North East England. Antipode, 39 (1), 93-125
PINCH, S. and MASON, C., 1991. Redundancy in an expanding labour market: a
case-study of displaced workers from two manufacturing plants in Southampton.
Urban Studies, 28 (5), 735-757
REGENERIS CONSULTING (RC), 2005a. MG Rover Task Force. Closure of MG
Rover: economic impact assessment. An interim report.
REGENERIS CONSULTING (RC), 2005b. MG Rover Task Force. Closure of MG
Rover: economic impact assessment. Stage 2 report.
SHUTT, J. HENDERSON, R. and KUMI-AMPOFO, F., 2003. Responding to a
regional economic crisis: an impact and regeneration assessment of the Selby
Coalfield Closure on the Yorkshire & Humber Region. Paper delivered to the
Regional Studies Association International Conference. Pisa, Italy, 12th-15th April
2003.
SMITH, D., 1989. “Not getting on, just getting by”: changing prospects in South
Birmingham. In Localities. The changing urban face of Great Britain. Ed by Phil
Cooke. Unwyn Hyman, London.
TOMANEY, J., CORNFORD, J., WHITTINGHAM, D. HAYWARD, S. PIKE, A.
and THOMAS, D., 1997. Workers’ experience of plant closure: the case of Swan
Hunter On Tyneside. Discussion Paper No. 97/1 Centre for Urban and Regional
Development Studies, University of Newcastle upon Tyne.
TOMANEY, J., PIKE, A. and CORNFORD, J. (1999) Plant closure and the local
economy: the case of Swan Hunter on Tyneside. Regional Studies, 33 (5), 401-411
i
Under the Labour Force Survey, unemployed people are without a job, want a job, have
actively sought work in the last 4 weeks and are available to start work in the next 2 weeks, or
out of work, have found a job and are waiting to start it in the next 2 weeks (ONS, 2006).
ii
The key component of this was the development of the Central Technology Belt and within
this, a science park at Longbridge. But there was no further regeneration strategy developed
following closure in 2005 until Birmingham and Bromsgrove sought to strengthen the
regeneration focus in October 2006 when they presented a plan to redevelop some of the
vacant parts of the Longbridge site to create mixed developments (Longbridge Action Plan,
2006). In addition, some long term unemployment strategies were put in place in Longbridge
and Northfield in the later stages of the MG Rover Task Force 2005. These were designed to
deal with suspected long term and community unemployment (RTF 2006; House of
Commons, 2007).