HuaronTR2022 10
HuaronTR2022 10
Prepared By:
M. Wafforn, P.Eng.
C. Emerson, FAusIMM.
A. Delgado, P.Eng.
TECHNICAL REPORT FOR THE HUARON PROPERTY, PASCO, PERU
1 SUMMARY
1.1 Introduction
This Technical Report has been prepared by Pan American Silver Corp. (Pan American or PAS), in accordance
with the disclosure requirements of National Instrument 43-101 Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects
(NI 43-101), to disclose relevant information about the Huaron property (the Property or Huaron). The
report is an update to, and replaces, the “Technical Report for the Huaron Property, Pasco, Peru”, with an
effective date of June 30, 2014, prepared by Pan American (2014 PAS Technical Report). The main purpose
of this report is to give an update on the Property, the Huaron mine operation and report the current
Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves.
The effective date of this Technical Report is October 30, 2022 and the effective date of the Mineral
Resources and Mineral Reserves which were depleted for mining at that time is June 30, 2022.
After the 1998 flooding, the Huaron mine operations were shut down and work was undertaken to clean up
the flood damage, drain the workings, and prepare for an eventual mine re-opening. The water level in the
lake, which provided the source of floodwater, is currently maintained well below the level where it flooded
into the old workings and no further flooding is expected.
Pan American acquired a majority interest in Huaron from Mauricio Hochschild & Cía Ltda. (Hochschild) in
2000 and began full scale operations in 2001. Production rates vary, but over the past several years the
Huaron processing plant has processed between 900,000 to 1,000,000 tonnes of ore annually, producing
copper, lead, and zinc concentrates containing approximately 3.7 million ounces (Moz) of silver, 6,000
tonnes of copper, 8,500 tonnes of lead, and 18,000 tonnes of zinc. Pan American expects to process
approximately one million tonnes per annum (Mtpa) over the course of the remaining life-of-mine (LOM).
Studies for expansion of the existing tailings storage facility are currently underway including engineering
design for a filtered-stacked tailings which is expected to be constructed in 2023 pending permitting
approval. The filtered-stacked tailings facility will provide additional tailings storage capacity to the existing
conventional pulp tailings storage facility.
No economic analyses or other engineering studies are currently underway.
• Mineral Reserve estimates were prepared under the supervision of or were reviewed by Martin Wafforn, P.Eng.,
Vice President, Technical Services of Pan American.
• Mr. Wafforn, P.Eng. is the Qualified Person for the Mineral Reserve estimates.
• Mineral Reserves are in addition to Mineral Resources.
1.7 Mining
Mechanized longitudinal C&F is used in areas where the development of an access ramp can be
economically justified. This is typically the case where the orebody is moderately dipping (<55°), sufficiently
wide (up to 10 metres (m)) and economic veins are present, or where the north-south striking and east-west
striking vein sets cross and provide additional mining faces. Drilling is undertaken with electric hydraulic
jumbo drills and the broken ore is removed using scoop trams.
C&F mining at Huaron commences once the decline (spiral ramps) reaches the footwall (FW) drive or level
access elevation of the orebody, usually midway along its strike length (see representative C&F sequence
sketch in Figure 16.3). C&F is an overhand mining method, and the stope sequence begins with the lowest
3.5 m high lift. Then each subsequent lift requires the back of the level access to be slashed down (‘take
down-back’ or TDB) to reach the next lift. There are typically four or five lifts between levels for a total rise
of 15.0 m to 17.5 m from each access.
1.9 Infrastructure
The mine infrastructure comprises the underground mine workings, processing facilities, existing tailing
impoundments, effluent management and treatment systems, waste rock storage facilities, maintenance
shops and warehouses laboratories, storage facilities, offices, drill core and logging sheds, water and power
lines, access roads, and the worker’s camp and recreational facilities. The primary source of power for the
mine is the Peruvian national power grid which is sufficient for the mine’s current requirements. The power
consumption is approximately 66 million kilowatt hours per year.
The operating mine is mature and site infrastructure including site roads are fully developed to support the
existing mine production of one Mtpa.
1.10 Environmental
The most significant environmental issue currently associated with the mine is treatment of the waters
discharged from the mine and localized areas of acid rock drainage from historic tailings below the mine’s
tailings deposit. All waters are captured and treated in a treatment plant near the exit of the Paul Nevejans
drainage tunnel to achieve compliance with discharge limits. There are no known environmental or social
issues that could materially impact the mine’s ability to extract the Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves.
A full suite of environmental baseline and impact assessment studies were completed by Pan American for
an update and tailings facility expansion Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA). The studies performed
include surface water, groundwater, biodiversity, seismic hazards, soils, geomorphology, air quality, and
climate. No material issues were identified in any environmental studies and the EIA was approved by the
Peruvian Ministry of Energy and Mines in 2010. Pan American is planning to commence new baseline
studies, which will supplement the regular environmental monitoring, for a modification to the Huaron EIA
in mid-2022.
Huaron participates in the Mining Association of Canada’s “Towards Sustainable Mining” program and has
achieved Level A on environmental protocols.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1 SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................... 2
1.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 2
1.2 Property description and ownership .......................................................................................... 2
1.3 Geology and mineralization ........................................................................................................ 2
1.4 Status of exploration, development, and operations................................................................. 2
1.5 Mineral Resources ...................................................................................................................... 3
1.6 Mineral Reserves ........................................................................................................................ 4
1.7 Mining ......................................................................................................................................... 5
1.8 Mineral processing and recovery methods ................................................................................ 5
1.9 Infrastructure .............................................................................................................................. 5
1.10 Environmental ............................................................................................................................. 5
1.11 Capital and operating costs ........................................................................................................ 6
1.12 Conclusions and recommendations............................................................................................ 6
2 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................... 17
2.1 General and terms of reference ................................................................................................. 17
2.2 The Issuer .................................................................................................................................... 17
2.3 Report authors ............................................................................................................................ 17
2.4 Sources of information ............................................................................................................... 18
2.5 Other ........................................................................................................................................... 18
3 RELIANCE ON OTHER EXPERTS.................................................................................................... 19
4 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION ................................................................................... 20
4.1 Location, issuer’s interest, mineral tenure, and surface rights .................................................. 20
4.2 Mineral tenure and title.............................................................................................................. 20
4.3 Royalties, back-in rights, payments, agreements, and encumbrances ...................................... 23
4.4 Environmental liabilities ............................................................................................................. 23
4.5 Permits ........................................................................................................................................ 24
4.6 Significant factors and risks ........................................................................................................ 24
5 ACCESSIBILITY, CLIMATE, LOCAL RESOURCES, INFRASTRUCTURE, AND PHYSIOGRAPHY .......... 25
5.1 Access, transport, and population centre................................................................................... 25
Tables
Table 1.1 Summary of Mineral Resources as at June 30, 2022 ...................................................... 4
Table 1.2 Summary of Huaron Mineral Reserves as of June 30, 2022 ........................................... 4
Table 2.1 Responsibilities of each qualified person ....................................................................... 17
Table 2.2 Responsibilities of those assisting each qualified person............................................... 18
Table 4.1 Mining concession details ............................................................................................... 21
Table 9.1 Summary of channel samples ......................................................................................... 37
Table 10.1 Drillhole summary ........................................................................................................... 39
Table 10.2 Greenfield drilling 2014 to 2017 ..................................................................................... 41
Table 11.1 Summary of all QA/QC samples 2015 – May 2022 ......................................................... 45
Table 11.2 Summary of QA/QC sample submission rates 2015 – May 2022 ................................... 45
Table 11.3 Summary of SRM performance – 2006 - 2013................................................................ 46
Table 11.4 SRMs submitted 2015 – May 2022 ................................................................................. 46
Table 11.5 Summary of SRMs submitted for analysis – 2015 – May 2022 ...................................... 47
Table 11.6 Summary of SRM failures – 2015 – May 2022 ................................................................ 47
Table 11.7 Summary of coarse blank performance 2015 - May 2022 ............................................. 51
Table 11.8 Summary of field duplicate performance – 2006 - 2013 ................................................ 52
Table 11.9 Summary of pulp duplicate performance – 2006 - 2013 ................................................ 52
Table 11.10 Summary of field duplicate performance Ag, Cu, Pb, and Zn – 2017 - May 2022.......... 53
Table 11.11 Summary of coarse duplicate performance Ag, Cu, Pb, and Zn – 2017 –May 2022 ...... 54
Table 11.12 Summary of pulp duplicate performance Ag, Cu, Pb, and Zn – 2015 - 2017.................. 55
Table 11.13 Summary of umpire duplicate performance Ag, Cu, Pb, and Zn – 2015 - May 2022 ..... 56
Table 13.1 Metallurgical recovery by year ....................................................................................... 59
Table 14.1 Summary of Mineral Resources – June 30, 2022............................................................ 60
Table 14.2 Modelled structures........................................................................................................ 63
Table 14.3 Composites statistics ...................................................................................................... 65
Table 14.4 Composites statistics and capping levels ........................................................................ 71
Table 14.5 Variogram parameters .................................................................................................... 73
Table 14.6 Search strategy and grade interpolation parameters .................................................... 78
Table 14.7 Composite selection plan................................................................................................ 80
Table 14.8 Density statistics by domain ........................................................................................... 82
Table 14.9 Block model details ......................................................................................................... 83
Table 14.10 Economic input parameters for Mineral Resource COGs ............................................... 91
Table 14.11 Huaron Mineral Resources as of June 30, 2022 ............................................................. 92
Table 15.1 Huaron unit costs considered for reserves cut-off value estimation ............................. 94
Table 15.2 Summary of Huaron Mineral Reserves as of June 30, 2022 ........................................... 95
Table 16.1 Current underground mobile mining equipment ........................................................... 100
Table 17.1 Summary of major process consumables ....................................................................... 105
Table 17.2 Metal production for the past 9 years ............................................................................ 105
Table 21.1 Annual operating costs ................................................................................................... 112
Figures
2 INTRODUCTION
2.1 General and terms of reference
This Technical Report has been prepared by Pan American, in accordance with the disclosure requirements
of NI 43-101, to disclose relevant information about the Property. The report is an update to, and replaces,
the 2014 PAS Technical Report, with an effective date of June 30, 2014, prepared by Pan American. The main
purpose of this report is to give an update on the Property, the Huaron mine operation, and report the
current Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves.
The effective date of this Technical Report is October 30, 2022. The effective date of the Mineral Resource
and Mineral Reserve estimates are June 30, 2022. No new material information has become available
between these dates and the signature date given on the certificate of the QPs.
Those who have assisted the QPs in its preparation, are also listed in Table 2.2.
Mathew Andrews, Vice President Environmental, Pan American has contributed to Sections 4.4, 4.5, and 20
by providing information and opinions relating to environmental details that are described in those sections.
The information and opinions are believed to be current, accurate and complete as of the effective date of
this report.
processing concessions, which grant the right to process minerals, and concessions which grant the right to
provide auxiliary services to the mining concessions and lie outside the Economic Administrative Units
(EAUs). Details of the 171 mining concessions and the processing concession are given in Table 4.1. Other
than the Processing concession, which is not assigned an area, 121 of the mining concessions are
concessions required by the mine operations and cover 4668.82 ha, and the remaining 48 mining
concessions are outside of the EAUs and cover 10,807.50 ha. This gives a total area of 15,476.31 ha for the
total concession area.
Table 4.1 Mining concession details
Number Name Area (ha) Number Name Area (ha)
Processing concession
P0100085 Concentradora Francois N/A
Mining concessions
04003370Y01 ABUNDANCIA 0.1603 04002451Y01 CONSTANCIA 1.0825
0403370AY01 ABUNDANCIA-A 0.0486 0402451AY01 CONSTANCIA-A 0.0739
04013287X01 ACUMULACION HUARON - 4 96.6606 04008037X01 CORDOBA 0.9554
04013289X01 ACUMULACION HUARON 6 251.6261 04012511X01 DARDANELOS 0.1982
04013284X01 ACUMULACION HUARON-1 795.6725 04003615X01 DIECINUEVE DE SETIEMBRE 0.5719
04013285X01 ACUMULACION HUARON-2 540.4909 04013463X01 DON JUAN Nº 2-88 687.5424
04013286X01 ACUMULACION HUARON-3 534.3813 04004653X01 DON PABLO 0.0464
04013290X01 ACUMULACION HUARON-7 787.1053 04003023X01 EL RAYO 0.2082
04002265Y01 ALIANZA Y FIRMEZA 0.0639 04003024X01 EL TRUENO 0.0741
0402265AY01 ALIANZA Y FIRMEZA-A 0.0169 04008033X01 ESPAÑA 0.1120
04004655X01 ALICIA 0.7654 04006692X01 FARALLON 7.9860
04002572X01 ALPAMINA 0.0506 04008586X01 FLORENCIA 0.1164
0402572AX01 ALPAMINA-A 0.8525 0403093AY01 FLORENCIA-A 0.2448
04000997X01 ANIMAS 0.1872 04004527X01 GAVIOTA 0.9225
04003431X01 APURO 0.3709 0404527AX01 GAVIOTA-A 1.8589
04000466X01 BALCON DE JUDAS 17.9689 04008276X01 GRANADA 5.5781
04001000X01 BALSAMO 1.9965 04004591X01 GUILLERMO BILLINGHURST 0.2760
04013394X01 C.M.H. Nº 101 0.5690 04002568X01 HUALGAYOC 0.0451
04013495X01 C.M.H. Nº 102 1.1554 04002567X01 HUANCAVELICA 0.0314
04013496X01 C.M.H. Nº 103 0.1834 04006355X01 HUAROCHIRI 0.5925
04010514X01 C.M.H. Nº 15 125.7841 010250094 HUARON 1 211.6553
04008913X01 C.M.H. Nº 16 0.7284 010250194 HUARON 2 1.6569
04008319X01 C.M.H. Nº 2 0.9388 010250294 HUARON 3 180.9170
04009299X01 C.M.H. Nº 25 21.6565 010250394 HUARON 4 127.5334
04009300X01 C.M.H. Nº 27 2.7139 010250494 HUARON 5 29.6580
04009301X01 C.M.H. Nº 28 29.6141 04008295X01 JUANA 0.0437
04008320X01 C.M.H. Nº 3 0.5161 04002211Y01 LA ALIANZA 11.9792
04009303X01 C.M.H. Nº 30 0.3297 04001001X01 LA CENTRAL 1.9966
04009433X02 C.M.H. Nº 33 1.7925 04006749X01 LA HUACA 0.7078
04009435X01 C.M.H. Nº 35 0.2543 0403589AY01 LA HUACA-A 0.0883
0403885AY01 C.M.H. Nº 3-A 0.7375 0403589BY01 LA HUACA-B 0.0486
04009481X01 C.M.H. Nº 44 0.8016 04004599X01 LA PEDRERA 0.5145
04008593X01 C.M.H. Nº 5 0.2413 04000099X01 LA PROVIDENCIA 0.0114
04009488X01 C.M.H. Nº 51 0.1332 04000998X01 LA TAPADA 3.9931
4.5 Permits
Pan American holds all the necessary environmental and operating permits for the development and
operation of the existing mine and is in compliance with Peruvian law. The MEM has provided approval for
Environmental Compliance and Management, the Special Program for Environmental Management, and
Environmental Impact Studies.
Pan American has obtained other permits necessary for normal operations of the mine, including permits for
water use, re-use of treated domestic wastewater, treated industrial and domestic wastewater disposal,
mine closure plans, tailings facility growth schedules, the use and storage of explosives, and facilities for
liquid fuel.
6 HISTORY
6.1 Ownership
The underground mine, mill, and supporting villages at Huaron were originally built in 1912 by a subsidiary
of the French Penarroya Company (Penarroya). In 1987 the mine was sold to Hochschild. In April 1998, a
portion of the bed of the nearby Lake Naticocha collapsed and flooded the neighbouring underground mine.
Through interconnected tunnels, the lake water entered and flooded the Huaron mine as well, causing its
closure.
After the April 1998 flooding, the Huaron mine operations were shut down, the labour force was
terminated, the camp closed, and work was undertaken to clean up the flood damage, drain the workings,
and prepare for an eventual mine re-opening. The water level in the lake, which provided the source of
floodwater, is currently maintained well below the level where it flooded into the old workings and no
further flooding is expected. In September 2000, the Animon mine, in accordance with a settlement
agreement reached with Cía Ltda. Minera Huaron S.A., constructed a channel to route water around the lake
to provide water for the Huaron mine operation and to reduce the water in upstream lakes in order to
prevent agricultural flooding, which had created local social pressures.
Pan American acquired a majority interest in Huaron from Hochschild in 2000 and fast-tracked the re-
opening project through feasibility, financing, and construction to begin full scale operations in 2001. Pan
American subsequently acquired the remaining interest and now holds 100% of the Property.
6.4 Production
Prior to Pan American’s acquisition of the Property, approximately 22 million tonnes (Mt) of silver-rich base
metal sulphide ore was produced from the mine. Silver made up about 49% of historic sales value, with zinc,
lead, and copper contributing 33%, 15%, and 3% respectively of the remaining portion. Ore from the mine
was processed on site by crushing, grinding, and flotation to produce silver-rich copper, lead, and zinc
concentrates, as it is today.
7.3 Structure
7.3.1 Folding
Folding occurred during the Paleogene, possibly during the Inca orogeny. During the deposition of the
Calipuy, an additional deformation occurred during the Quechua orogeny. These two phases are present in
the Huarón area, with the sequence of folded Casapalca formation forming an anticline, and the sequence of
the Calipuy Group forming a slightly asymmetric open anticline.
Figure 7.3 is a schematic section which is not to scale showing the Huaron anticline and the rocks at Huaron.
7.3.2 Faulting
There are large dislocations accompanied by secondary faults in the region. These faults are represented in
the Huarón area by the Huaychao - Cometa north-south fault and the Llacsacocha Fault. Both faults divide
the deposit into four sectors. Local faults recognized only in the Huaron mine are the Shiusha Fault (related
to the Pozo D Fault) and the Tapada Fault (related to the Anteabigarrada Fault). Horst-type movement
occurred between the Shiusha Fault and the Tapada Fault zones.
7.3.3 Unconformity
An unconformity has recently been defined on each flank of the anticline throughout the property. The
unconformity occurs at the contact between the Casapalca Formation and the Calipuy Group and provides
control to mineralization.
7.4 Alteration
Dominant hydrothermal alteration of the enclosing rocks are argilization - silicification (associated with the
copper trend), potassic alteration (associated with the Lead - Zinc zone), epidote-pyrite (associated with the
silicified zone) and chlorite - magnetite (throughout the entire deposit).
7.5 Mineralization
The Huaron mine is a producer of silver, zinc, lead, and copper. Ore mineralogy is made up of tetrahedrite -
tenantite (gray copper), sphalerite, galena, and chalcopyrite - enargite as the most abundant ore minerals;
gangue minerals mainly represented include quartz, rhodochrosite, rhodonite, manganocalcite, and
alabandite.
Research has shown the presence of three different stages of mineralization and related to high
temperatures (milky quartz, pyrite, tetrahedrite), intermediate temperatures (milky quartz, pyrite, brown
sphalerite, and galena) and low temperatures (barite, siderite, dolomite, blonde sphalerite, galena,
argentiferous tetrahedrite, polybasite, chalcopyrite, rhodochrosite, quartz, and calcite). Huarón
mineralization is assumed to be of Pliocene age.
The first pulse of mineralization was associated with the emplacement of intrusive bodies and the
subsequent opening of structures, as zinc, iron, tin, and tungsten minerals were deposited. This was
followed by a copper, lead, and silver rich stage, and finally by an antimony / silver phase associated with
quartz.
The most important economic minerals are tennantite-tetrahedrite (containing most of the silver),
sphalerite, and galena, though more than 90 other minerals have been identified. The principal gangue
minerals are pyrite, quartz, calcite, and rhodochrosite. Enargite and pyrrhotite are common in the central
copper core of the mine and zinc oxides and silicates are encountered in structures with deep weathering.
Silver is also found as pyrargyrite, proustite, polybasite, and pearceite.
There is a definite mineral zoning at Huaron. A central copper core contains enargite as the principal
economic mineral with copper, pyrite and quartz in structures. This area was extensively mined by previous
operators but metal grades and prices were overshadowed by the negative impact of high arsenic and
antimony content and poor metal recoveries. To the east and west of the central core silver, lead, and zinc
minerals are associated with calcite and rhodochrosite. Areas to the north of the central core contain silver,
lead, and zinc minerals associated with pyrite. Sphalerite and sulfosalts with rhodochrosite follow a narrow
band running north-south along the general axis of the anticline.
Huaron is a hydrothermal polymetallic deposit of silver, lead, zinc, and copper mineralization hosted within
structures likely related to the intrusion of monzonite dikes, principally located within the Huaron anticline.
Mineralization occurs in veins parallel to the main fault systems, in replacement bodies known as “mantos”
associated with the calcareous sections of the conglomerates and other favorable stratigraphic horizons,
and as dissemination in the monzonitic intrusions at vein intersections. The mineralization controls
recognized in the deposit are structural, lithological, and stratigraphic.
The types of mineralized bodies present in Huarón are veins, mantos, and stockworks.
• Veins: The mineralized veins vary from a few cm to up to 10 m wide, and may extend along strike for
up to 1,800 m. Most of the structures show open mineralization at depth and along strike and have
excellent exploration potential. Vein orientations vary but generally trend east-west or north-south.
The deposit consists of 96 different structures which have been grouped into 13 families of
mineralized trends according to location and orientation (Figure 7.4).
• Mantos: Mantos are gently dipping structures located on the western flank of the anticline.
• Stockworks: Stockwork zones have been mined with mechanized methods and high productivity.
Stockwork zones occur at the intersection of veins, where veins intersect conglomerate beds (causing
replacements), and also at the intersection of veins with calcareous sandstone strata (causing
disseminations). Stockwork-like bodies related to the intrusive-sandstone contact are rarely
recognized.
8 DEPOSIT TYPES
Huaron is a hydrothermal polymetallic silver-copper-lead-zinc deposit likely related to Miocene aged
intrusive monzonite dikes within the Huaron anticline. Exploration for economic veins, mantos and
disseminated mineralization styles similar to those present on the Property is conducted using a
combination of underground diamond drilling and channel sampling from drifts excavated along the
mineralized zones.
9 EXPLORATION
Huaron is an active mining operation with ongoing exploration conducted using a combination of
underground diamond drilling and channel sampling from drifts excavated along the mineralized zones.
Generally, underground drillholes that intersect promising economic grade mineralization are followed up
by drifting towards and then along the vein zone.
As underground drifting advances for mining, channel samples are routinely collected in drifts that are used
for Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserve estimates. Channel samples are collected every 4 m across the
vein in stoping areas, every 2 m across the vein in sublevels and drifts, and every 1 m in vertical
development raises. Each channel sample weighs between 4 kilograms (kg) and 6 kg and is taken
perpendicular to the structure after the face has been cleaned with a water hose or hard brush to reduce
the risk of sample contamination. Samples are selected according to geological intervals and according to
the width of the intersection with the vein which vary between 0.1 m and 1.5 m in length. Since the
beginning of 2014 to May 31 2022, Pan American has collected 86,811 samples, including a total of 260,125
samples since 2001. The results of these samples are loaded in to the Datamine FusionTM (Fusion) database.
The number of samples taken by year is shown in Table 9.1.
Table 9.1 Summary of channel samples
2001 3,795 Not known Information from monthly reports Oct to Dec 2001 only
Channel sampling generally provides reliable data for the Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserve estimates,
provided that appropriate measures are taken to prevent sample contamination to ensure an unbiased,
representative sample. The channel samples are taken at regular spacing in drifts above and below the
Mineral Reserve volumes, assuring they are as spatially representative as possible. There are no known
issues that could materially impact the reliability of the sampling results.
10 DRILLING
10.1 Drilling summary and database
Huaron’s long mine life has provided for extensive diamond drillhole coverage from the underground
workings. There are no available details on the nature of drilling undertaken by previous operators;
therefore, the following descriptions represent only Pan American’s practices.
Most of the drilling centres over the strike length of the currently defined Mineral Resources and Mineral
Reserves. A summary of the drillholes completed on the Property by all operators up to the end of May,
2022 is shown in Table 10.1. This includes the drillholes described in Section 10.3 and listed in Table 10.2.
Table 10.1 Drillhole summary
Year Company # of drillholes Metres
2003 Pan American 92 10,000
2004 Pan American 68 15,002
2005 Pan American 88 8,147
2006 Pan American 87 11,647
2007 Pan American 117 15,046
2008 Pan American 118 18,507
2009 Pan American 46 5,431
2010 Pan American 87 16,107
2011 Pan American 113 25,104
2012 Pan American 177 33,437
2013 Pan American 155 26,003
2014 Pan American 231 45,068
2015 Pan American 118 22,276
2016 Pan American 209 36,276
2017 Pan American 310 57,086
2018 Pan American 139 20,645
2019 Pan American 128 19,238
2020 Pan American 37 6,103
2021 Pan American 90 19,239
To May 2022 Pan American 21 4,893
Total 2,432 415,294
Diamond drillholes are orientated to intersect the targeted vein as close to perpendicular as possible and are
spaced as regularly as possible to ensure representative sample coverage. Nominal spacing is planned for
pierce points on vein at 50 m - 60 m apart. A plan showing the location of the drillholes is given in Figure
10.1.
10.3.1 Summary
Drilling regarded as exploration drilling or greenfield drilling was carried out by Pan American from 2014 to
2017. During the period of activity, a total of 39,824 m was completed in 145 drillholes. The following targets
were investigated: Shiusha Warren, Chert Sevilla-Sevilla Este, Chosica-Chosica Sur, Salpo, Patrick, and Rey.
The locations of the drillholes are shown in Figure 10.2.
The crushed sample is homogenized and separated through a riffle splitter to an approximate 150-gram
sample that is subsequently pulverized to a pulp sample >95% at – 140 mesh. 2% of the total pulp samples
per batch are weighed to calculate sample weight loss.
Assays are performed using acid digestion and atomic absorption spectroscopy, and analyzed for silver, zinc,
lead, and copper content by the SGS managed onsite laboratory.
11.5.1 Overview
The on-site laboratory conducts its own routine internal quality assurance and quality control (QA/QC)
program. For each batch of 20 samples at least one duplicate sample and one certified standard is submitted
by the laboratory. The laboratory information management system, LIMS software, which connects with
Datamines’ Fusion ensures that the results are saved directly in the geological database without data
transcription errors.
A QA/QC program independent of the on-site laboratory and supervised by the geology department is also
employed. This involves the submission of one Standard Reference Material (SRM) and one blank on a daily
basis to the onsite laboratory. Duplicate samples comprising one quarter of the second half of the diamond
drill core and duplicate samples obtained by collecting a sample of equal weight from the same channel
sample location as the original are also submitted, both to the onsite laboratory (Inspectorate Bureau
Veritas) and to an external laboratory (ACTLABS, Inspectorate Bureau Veritas Lima, Peru. Certifications: ISO
9001, ISO 14025, ISO 45001 and ISO 14001) to act as a check on the onsite laboratory. A system is in place to
ensure that any failed QA/QC samples are identified and that the required corrective action is taken in a
timely manner, which usually involves a review of procedures to ensure that the established sample
preparation and analysis protocols are being followed.
Table 11.1 and Table 11.2 list the number and rates of the submission of QA/QC samples of all types for
2015 to the end of May 2022.
Table 11.2 Summary of QA/QC sample submission rates 2015 – May 2022
Year SRMs Blanks Coarse duplicates Field duplicates Umpire samples
2015 2.26% 2.76% 1.73% 1.07% 3.30%
2016 3.83% 2.01% 2.06% 1.82% 3.41%
2017 4.61% 3.69% 1.73% 2.03% 1.52%
2018 4.52% 3.74% 1.79% 1.14%
2019 2.79% 3.33% 2.03% 0.69% 0.01%
2020 6.26% 3.01% 2.13% 0.27% 0.01%
2021 10.33% 4.51% 3.34% 0.68% 0.01%
To May 2022 7.59% 3.11% 2.87% 0.41% 0.03%
As can be seen from Table 11.1 and Table 11.2, the total number of control samples submitted has increased
over time, particularly for the SRMs and blanks. A submission rate of 4 - 5% (relative to total samples
analyzed) for each QA/QC sample type is considered ideal. For future QA/QC programs, the QP will address
the low submission rate of duplicate samples.
All SRMs are made from the mine's own material, analyzed in six laboratories, and finally certified by those
laboratories. These insertions allow the behavior of each dispatched batch to be evaluated, identify failures,
and take corrective action. When a failure is noted, the entire batch is sent for repeat analysis.
Table 11.5 Summary of SRMs submitted for analysis – 2015 – May 2022
SRM name 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Total
STD-MEDIO 468 229 218 915
ESTANDAR ALTO 110 446 392 948
STD-1 7 7
STD-BAJO 387 139 526
ESTANDAR MEDIO 63 436 398 897
STD-ALTO 236 611 66 913
STD-2 316 404 720
STD-5 181 263 444
Total 323 577 882 790 468 465 1,397 468 5,370
Table 11.6 summarizes the SRM performance for all SRMs submitted between 2015 and May 2022. As
discussed, previously a failure was defined where the analyzed value was ±3 standard deviations (SD) from
the expected SRM value.
Table 11.6 Summary of SRM failures – 2015 – May 2022
SRM Ag % Fail Cu % Fail Pb % Fail Zn % Fail
STD-MEDIO 0.4 0.1 0.3 1.2
ESTANDAR ALTO 0.6 19.0 7.8 6.4
STD-1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
STD-BAJO 0.0 0.6 0.3 0.1
ESTANDAR MEDIO 0.6 9.8 0.7 0.6
STD-ALTO 0.4 0.1 0.0 0.1
STD-2 0.1 1.3 1.9 2.5
STD-5 0.0 2.0 1.1 1.7
The failures for SRM ESTANDER ALTO were seen in the control chart and the majority of these relate to 2016
samples when the SRM was first introduced. The failures for ESTANDER MEDIO occurred in 2016 and 2017,
no failures were recorded in 2018.
Figure 11.1 and Figure 11.2 show the SRM control charts for STD-MEDIO and ESTANDAR ALTO for Ag, Cu, Pb,
and Zn, respectively. The STD-MEDIO SRM performed well over the entire period it was submitted. The
ESTANDAR ALTO SRM performed poorly for Cu, Pb, and Zn for the 2016 samples. A correction was made for
samples from 2017 onwards. For Cu and Zn, in 2017, there appears to be a low bias, which was corrected in
2018.
Figure 11.1 STD-MEDIO SRM Control Chart (Au, Ag, Pb, Zn) – 2015 - May 2022
Figure 11.2 ESTANDER ALTO SRM Control Chart (Au, Ag, Pb, Zn) – 2020 - May 2022
Note: Some extreme high or low failures are excluded from the control charts for a better representation of the SRM
performance.
Source: PAS (2022).
Overall, the SRMs performed well, with improvement in performance over time, with a significant
improvement since mid-way through 2017. Since 2018, very few failures have occurred.
11.5.3 Blanks
Coarse blanks test for contamination during both the sample preparation and assay process. Pulp blanks test
for contamination occurring during the analytical process. At Huaron, pulp blanks were submitted from 2015
to 2017 and coarse blanks have been submitted since 2018.
Table 11.7 summarizes the pass rate of blanks by year over the period from 2015 to the end of May, 2022.
The blank performance indicates that there are no laboratory hygiene issues.
Coarse duplicates
No coarse duplicates were submitted between April 2006 and December 2013.
Pulp duplicates
The results of precision pairs may be assessed using a ranked absolute relative difference plot, with
acceptable results corresponding to ±10% agreement on 90% of pulp duplicate pairs when using the ranked
half absolute relative difference plot.
Table 11.9 Summary of pulp duplicate performance – 2006 - 2013
Sample Duplicate sample
Laboratory ± Agreement % Bias
Numbers type
Certimin 609 Pulp 94 Duplicates have slightly lower grades
Duplicates have lower grade above the
ALS Chemex 1,115 Pulp 92
97.5th percentile
Acme 1,337 Pulp 94 None
Table 11.10 Summary of field duplicate performance Ag, Cu, Pb, and Zn – 2017 - May 2022
Element Year 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 May 2022 2017 - 2022
Field sample pairs
388 (307) 199 (172) 115 (113) 20 (19) 92 (91) 25 (23) 839 (725)
(Pairs > 15 x LDL)
Ag Field sample pairs <
126 50 22 7 24 6 235
30% RPD
Bias (%) 3 -9 10 -2 -2 12 1
Field sample pairs
388 (100) 199 (92) 115 (83) 20 (18) 92 (43) 25 (14) 839 (350)
(Pairs > 15 x LDL)
Cu Field sample pairs <
136 65 20 8 24 11 264
30% RPD
Bias (%) -1 -1 7 -1 -4 18 0
Field sample pairs
388 (270) 199 (155) 115 (104) 20 (18) 92 (84) 25 (23) 839 (654)
(Pairs > 15 x LDL)
Pb Field sample pairs <
147 69 29 61 28 7 288
30% RPD
Bias (%) -1 8 11 7 1 -7 3
Field sample pairs
388 (338) 199 (179) 115 (110) 20 (20) 92 (87) 25 (24) 839 (758)
(Pairs > 15 x LDL)
Zn Field sample pairs <
133 61 21 68 25 8 254
30% RPD
Bias (%) 2 -2 -1 -2 -2 8 0
Figure 11.4 RPD and scatter plot of field duplicates for Ag – 2017 – May 2022
The field duplicate performance is reasonable. The performance has improved over time. Ag and Cu
performed the best and overall meet the assessment criteria for field duplicate performance. Pb and Zn just
fall sort of the assessment criteria, however, the results are deemed acceptable.
Coarse duplicates
A total of 1,772 coarse duplicates were submitted between 2015 - May 2022. Table 11.11 summarizes the
coarse duplicate performance by year for Ag, Cu, Pb, and Zn for coarse duplicate samples submitted
between 2017 - May 2022. An LDL of 0.5 Ag ppm and 0.005% Cu, Pb, and Zn was used. The bias is measured
based on the mean grade of the original sample dataset versus the duplicate sample dataset. A positive bias
result indicates the overall the original samples are returning higher values than the duplicate samples.
Figure 11.5 shows the scatter plot for Ag and Zn including coarse duplicates from 2017 - May 2022.
Table 11.11 Summary of coarse duplicate performance Ag, Cu, Pb, and Zn – 2017 –May 2022
Element Year 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017 - 2022
Coarse sample pairs
331 (329) 314 (313) 340 (340) 158 (158) 453 (450) 176 (176) 1,772 (1,766)
(Pairs > 15 x LDL)
Ag Coarse sample pairs <
92 11 7 2 10 5 127
20% RPD
Bias (%) 5 0 0 0 -1 1 1
Coarse sample pairs
331 (256) 314 (249) 340 (268) 158 (136) 453 (334) 176 (143) 1,772 (1,386)
(Pairs > 15 x LDL)
Cu Coarse sample pairs < 28
104 22 7 26 5 192
20% RPD 95
Bias (%) -11 -1 2 -1 1 1 -2
Coarse sample pairs
331 (307) 314 (300) 340 (328) 158 (149) 453 (430) 176 (169) 1,772 (1,683)
(Pairs > 15 x LDL)
Pb Coarse sample pairs <
102 15 7 2 19 13 158
20% RPD
Bias (%) -3 -1 1 1 -1 0 0
Coarse sample pairs
331 (328) 314 (314) 340 (336) 158 (158) 453 (449) 176 (172) 1,772 (1,757)
(Pairs > 15 x LDL)
Zn Coarse sample pairs <
103 11 9 1 17 3 144
20% RPD
Bias (%) 1 0 1 0 0 0 0
Figure 11.5 RPD and scatter plot of coarse duplicates for Ag – 2017 - May 2022
The coarse duplicates performed very well for all elements. There is a noticeable improvement in precision
after the 2017 program. The coarse duplicates have performed consistently well over the period 2017 - May
2022.
Pulp duplicates
A total of 1,353 pulp duplicates were submitted between 2015 - 2017. Table 11.12 summarizes the
performance by year for Ag, Cu, Pb, and Zn for pulp duplicate samples submitted between 2015 - 2017. An
LDL of 0.5 Ag ppm and 0.005% Cu, Pb, and Zn was used. The bias is measured based on the mean grade of
the original sample dataset versus the duplicate sample dataset. A positive bias result indicates the overall
the original samples are returning higher values than the duplicate samples. Figure 11.6 shows the RPD and
scatter plot for Ag including coarse duplicates from 2015 - 2017.
Table 11.12 Summary of pulp duplicate performance Ag, Cu, Pb, and Zn – 2015 - 2017
Element Year 2015 2016 2017 2015 - 2017
Pulp sample pairs (Pairs > 15 x LDL) 373 (346) 576 (518) 377 (345) 1,326 (1,209)
Ag Pulp sample pairs < 20% RPD 58 58 61 59
Bias (%) 2 0 -3 0
Pulp sample pairs (Pairs > 15 x LDL) 373 (183) 576 (302) 377 (167) 1,326 (652)
Cu Pulp sample pairs < 20% RPD 69 58 69 64
Bias (%) -11 -5 3 -6
Pulp sample pairs (Pairs > 15 x LDL) 373 (335) 576 (475) 377 (307) 1,326 (1,117)
Pb Pulp sample pairs < 20% RPD 58 54 59 57
Bias (%) 4 3 2 3
Pulp sample pairs (Pairs > 15 x LDL) 373 (358) 576 (533) 377 (353) 1,326 (1,244)
Zn Pulp sample pairs < 20% RPD 56 58 61 58
Bias (%) 6 0 -2 1
Figure 11.6 RPD and scatter plot of pulp duplicates for Ag – 2015 - 2017
Figure 11.7 RPD and scatter plot of umpire duplicates for Ag – 2015 - May 2022
The umpire samples for Cu and Zn performed well. The umpire samples for Ag and Pb performed below the
assessment criteria for umpire duplicates, however the QP considers them to be reasonable. The QP notes
that the QA/QC performance has improved since 2017 and that umpire duplicates should be inserted in
future QA/QC programs.
12 DATA VERIFICATION
12.1 Geology data reviews
On an annual basis, the QP reviews the diamond drilling plans and the Mineral Resource estimate
procedures including the vein interpretations, treatment of extreme sample grade values, and the estimate
of tonnes and grade. The reconciliation between the mine plan and the processing plant are reviewed
quarterly, and the drillhole vein intersection width and grade results and QA/QC results are reviewed
monthly. During mine visits, the exploration drilling, sample, and security protocols are reviewed, along with
the operational mine plan, actual mine operation data, and grade control protocols.
Interpreted veins / structures using wireframes constructed on site with Leapfrog software are validated by
senior personnel under the QP’s supervision. Wireframe construction using vein / structures codes, channel
samples, diamond drill samples and marginal cut-off values are all verified. The objective of the review is to
verify the coded data in the wireframes that are used to run the resource estimation.
In the opinion of the QP, the data used for the Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserve estimates are
sufficiently reliable for those purposes.
The domain wireframe was constructed by a geologist using a marginal VPT, and domain extensions were
defined at a limit of closer to 50% of the local drillhole spacing, or 50% of the distance to an excluded
drillhole. Also, domains were constructed for the HW and FW of each structure (adding 01 to the vein code
for the HW and 02 to the vein code for the FW). Vein orientations at the structures have been confirmed
through underground mapping and sampling, as well as vein orientations observed in drill core.
A total of 34 wireframes for the mineralized zone, 34 for the HW, and 34 for the FW were modeled
altogether at Huaron mine. Final domains are presented in Figure 14.2. No minimum mining width was used
to model shapes.
14.5.1 Compositing
Assay samples were composited to represent the full-length intercept of each domain. A histogram of assay
lengths within mineralization domains is presented in Figure 14.3 as a histogram of the composite interval
lengths within the mineralization domain at Juanita Ramal, as an example. The chosen composite length is
1.5 m or 2.0 m for different domains.
Figure 14.3 and silver composite statistics are summarized in Table 14.3.
Domain Number of Composited Mean (g/t Ag) Mean (% Cu) Mean (% Pb) Mean (% Zn)
8801 70 139.63 0.42 0.10 0.18
8802 101 28.96 0.09 0.18 0.26
90 15 289.69 0.09 2.06 4.61
9001 30 3.91 0.00 0.05 0.26
9002 16 1.26 0.00 0.01 0.08
91 2669 193.94 0.95 1.46 4.63
9101 258 33.50 0.12 0.24 1.14
9102 291 29.85 0.14 0.31 1.34
94 859 200.30 1.15 2.30 4.29
9401 176 30.18 0.08 0.43 0.81
9402 142 28.79 0.06 0.56 1.16
98 1253 257.86 1.11 5.07 10.02
9801 36 23.10 0.09 0.43 0.69
9802 43 38.98 0.14 0.68 1.23
102 1127 226.71 0.24 1.21 3.82
10201 107 92.04 0.07 0.74 1.46
10202 133 29.39 0.04 0.42 1.01
103 445 214.64 0.15 2.83 5.28
10301 76 33.88 0.04 0.37 0.83
10302 78 35.59 0.03 0.41 0.64
104 1436 240.70 1.03 1.21 3.27
10401 211 30.00 0.13 0.26 0.76
10402 187 61.84 0.21 0.34 0.83
106 1298 313.56 0.40 1.10 4.08
10601 323 55.51 0.05 0.60 1.53
10602 252 55.57 0.06 0.37 1.21
107 5082 336.32 1.95 1.22 2.93
10701 393 34.63 0.15 0.25 0.61
10702 404 37.46 0.14 0.22 0.54
108 3289 188.47 5.97 0.35 0.85
10801 333 42.04 2.28 0.15 0.35
10802 304 45.98 1.61 0.19 0.73
109 336 183.98 1.47 0.83 4.28
10901 100 46.18 0.11 0.07 0.94
10902 89 25.05 0.19 0.16 0.74
116 23 178.46 0.11 2.43 5.57
11601 21 20.33 0.02 0.29 1.38
11602 20 24.34 0.02 0.44 2.15
155 1044 288.66 0.14 4.24 5.07
15501 187 34.53 0.03 0.42 0.65
15502 205 29.87 0.02 0.36 0.58
156 6544 210.11 0.46 0.56 3.65
15601 525 37.31 0.10 0.16 1.00
15602 434 33.71 0.12 0.14 1.04
157 15 158.12 0.48 1.88 4.51
Domain Number of Composited Mean (g/t Ag) Mean (% Cu) Mean (% Pb) Mean (% Zn)
15701 12 9.64 0.03 0.13 0.85
15702 12 25.42 0.03 0.42 2.28
213 3194 261.97 1.96 1.23 2.82
21301 341 31.13 0.18 0.20 0.65
21302 394 23.62 0.10 0.23 0.65
215 91 197.03 2.58 1.10 1.51
21501 65 7.35 0.07 0.05 0.15
21502 67 16.04 0.18 0.13 0.29
217 655 456.92 0.25 2.92 3.45
21701 29 25.25 0.02 0.25 0.25
21702 35 86.29 0.07 0.44 0.73
219 208 269.62 0.63 1.48 4.13
21901 17 11.31 0.02 0.17 0.39
21902 14 38.74 0.06 0.30 0.80
221 223 347.05 0.26 1.90 2.46
22101 106 17.21 0.02 0.13 0.29
22102 101 14.25 0.02 0.15 0.19
222 326 422.57 0.58 4.98 5.28
22201 16 38.40 0.30 0.31 0.90
22202 15 71.85 0.29 0.16 0.38
225 22 126.97 0.14 2.04 3.19
22501 41 12.17 0.01 0.24 0.43
22502 32 45.97 0.02 1.06 1.04
228 14 192.83 0.73 0.99 3.41
22801 39 4.29 0.01 0.02 0.03
22802 32 17.21 0.02 0.19 0.07
229 161 400.46 0.34 1.87 3.01
22901 82 43.03 0.03 0.54 0.73
22902 79 38.35 0.02 0.36 0.59
230 6 130.59 0.03 1.95 3.75
23001 14 16.96 0.00 0.44 0.54
23002 13 22.21 0.01 0.47 0.77
231 42 87.63 0.03 2.33 3.05
23101 8 15.56 0.01 0.40 0.68
23102 14 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00
233 217 139.29 0.16 2.64 4.62
23301 25 83.50 0.09 1.64 2.92
23302 27 47.10 0.05 1.06 2.06
234 8 161.65 0.07 0.73 1.66
23401 7 5.71 0.00 0.02 0.09
23402 4 11.80 0.05 0.22 0.44
235 328 322.29 1.70 1.75 2.93
23501 49 39.60 0.23 0.20 0.54
23502 44 37.47 0.33 0.18 0.59
238 3 317.96 0.13 1.41 3.28
Domain Number of Composited Mean (g/t Ag) Mean (% Cu) Mean (% Pb) Mean (% Zn)
23801 4 3.77 0.00 0.01 0.03
23802 3 1.63 0.00 0.01 0.01
241 304 246.33 0.06 4.55 3.75
24101 95 27.63 0.01 0.45 0.39
24102 87 42.69 0.02 0.66 0.53
250 394 159.31 0.03 0.42 3.24
25001 119 40.51 0.02 0.16 1.13
25002 130 32.46 0.01 0.14 1.08
254 12 115.79 0.08 1.70 2.57
25401 37 32.42 0.05 0.52 1.32
25402 25 41.80 0.05 0.68 1.68
256 191 178.09 0.89 1.92 5.87
25601 45 14.59 0.10 0.08 0.44
25602 28 29.24 0.06 0.22 1.09
257 197 186.99 0.04 0.98 3.23
25701 123 30.51 0.01 0.13 0.52
25702 102 46.19 0.01 0.18 0.79
258 841 435.58 0.10 0.59 3.38
25801 98 30.04 0.01 0.14 0.34
25802 108 28.16 0.01 0.38 0.76
260 141 209.93 0.04 0.64 2.06
26001 110 43.34 0.01 0.24 0.78
26002 131 36.56 0.01 0.40 0.87
261 431 249.33 0.60 4.64 6.62
26101 136 14.88 0.03 0.28 0.62
26102 148 19.22 0.03 0.39 0.69
263 107 148.26 0.12 1.78 3.74
26301 23 20.01 0.04 0.12 0.45
26302 33 32.45 0.04 0.19 1.06
265 421 206.64 0.06 5.47 4.15
26501 109 25.82 0.01 0.71 0.72
26502 95 23.27 0.01 0.61 0.49
266 856 542.04 1.52 2.64 4.51
26601 84 35.93 0.05 0.27 0.45
26602 71 59.77 0.07 0.27 0.45
267 277 552.98 0.21 4.89 3.12
26701 27 158.66 0.05 2.08 0.44
26702 20 23.34 0.01 0.44 0.55
269 383 660.38 0.35 3.70 2.91
26901 21 9.59 0.01 0.06 0.09
26902 22 5.77 0.03 0.02 0.03
271 228 266.84 0.04 6.84 3.52
27101 31 20.15 0.01 0.47 0.47
27102 38 27.18 0.01 0.59 0.56
401 46 256.26 1.06 1.88 4.53
Domain Number of Composited Mean (g/t Ag) Mean (% Cu) Mean (% Pb) Mean (% Zn)
40101 22 26.97 0.06 0.28 0.55
40102 12 104.50 0.23 0.47 1.22
941 39 156.60 0.31 2.39 4.41
94101 2 61.70 0.07 1.08 2.53
94102 7 52.36 0.09 0.82 1.65
1551 568 179.08 0.67 1.19 5.93
15501 27 43.28 0.08 0.32 1.55
15502 11 107.17 0.59 0.33 1.67
1561 1813 271.61 0.58 0.82 3.89
15601 164 32.74 0.05 0.29 0.97
15602 183 32.93 0.07 0.38 1.03
2151 222 273.12 1.17 0.68 2.54
21501 33 38.77 0.33 0.43 1.11
21502 53 27.73 0.09 0.17 0.54
2291 147 483.23 1.31 1.75 3.68
22901 21 19.15 0.03 0.11 0.48
22902 21 31.61 0.03 0.28 0.76
Figure 14.3 is a histogram of the composite interval lengths within the mineralization domain at Juanita
Ramal structure as an example. The chosen composite length varies between 1.5 m and 2.0 m.
Figure 14.3 Histogram of sample interval lengths within Juanita Ramal structure
ORE HW FW
Capped Capped Capped Capped Capped
Cap Cap Cap Cap Cap Cap (% Cap Cap Cap Cap (% Cap (% Cap (%
Domain Mean (g/t Mean Mean Mean CV
(g/t Ag) (% Cu) (% Pb) (% Zn) (g/t Ag) Cu) (% Pb) (% Zn) (g/t Ag) Cu Pb) Zn)
Ag) (% Cu) (% Pb) (% Zn) (g/t Ag)
217 1674.78 0.91 10.38 11.79 399.51 0.25 2.71 2.99 0.72 75.66 0.04 0.57 0.59 96.72 0.10 0.51 1.30
219 737.42 2.17 7.05 9.93 258.36 0.58 1.32 3.89 0.62 74.19 0.11 0.68 1.71 129.69 0.20 1.53 2.38
221 1936.32 1.28 9.70 11.40 276.71 0.21 1.62 2.15 1.01 136.40 0.11 0.52 1.63 90.00 0.07 0.55 0.89
222 1190.00 1.70 12.61 13.68 403.64 0.53 4.74 4.88 0.57 122.82 1.45 1.00 2.75 197.73 0.76 0.61 1.18
225 337.09 0.47 6.53 8.06 113.78 0.12 1.47 2.45 0.57 62.61 0.02 1.43 2.04 149.69 0.07 3.86 3.18
228 411.59 2.56 3.91 10.84 174.35 0.56 0.64 2.50 0.49 15.11 0.03 0.06 0.11 119.47 0.10 1.03 0.32
229 1229.00 1.16 4.35 7.17 348.05 0.29 1.31 2.77 0.76 150.72 0.18 1.97 3.17 140.40 0.10 1.73 2.27
230 190.52 0.06 3.75 10.81 115.71 0.02 1.40 1.90 0.26 42.21 0.01 1.22 1.86 37.98 0.03 0.89 1.47
231 226.22 0.07 7.00 6.78 72.79 0.03 2.00 2.72 0.49 66.73 0.03 1.77 3.11 10.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
233 411.65 0.51 8.13 16.31 128.40 0.13 2.45 4.25 0.61 227.54 0.27 7.23 12.48 176.40 0.24 6.28 8.10
234 338.55 0.18 2.39 3.86 135.66 0.05 0.30 1.33 0.38 23.65 0.01 0.08 0.32 16.10 0.11 0.36 0.65
235 1167.49 7.75 9.05 12.24 281.75 1.56 1.49 2.42 0.68 92.57 0.88 0.91 1.80 90.58 1.20 0.71 1.88
238 433.69 0.15 1.79 3.74 254.61 0.12 1.05 3.07 0.21 10.76 0.00 0.02 0.08 6.12 0.00 0.03 0.06
241 968.69 0.28 17.40 11.97 222.93 0.06 4.13 3.68 0.89 161.23 0.04 2.20 2.33 205.63 0.08 3.47 2.48
250 640.55 0.19 1.74 10.47 144.60 0.03 0.35 2.87 0.95 214.65 0.04 0.57 4.61 128.50 0.04 0.48 3.59
254 194.29 0.15 3.11 4.65 101.28 0.08 1.54 2.29 0.27 56.86 0.11 1.22 2.98 74.53 0.06 1.26 3.10
256 534.45 6.09 6.66 13.94 162.35 0.75 1.82 5.68 0.61 71.68 0.38 0.30 2.09 139.27 0.21 1.00 5.71
257 641.16 0.17 6.64 13.41 163.25 0.04 0.64 2.54 0.67 105.43 0.02 0.48 1.77 170.41 0.03 0.50 2.44
258 2314.11 0.51 3.69 16.32 376.38 0.09 0.49 2.97 1.24 87.53 0.01 0.51 1.86 129.98 0.04 1.46 5.06
260 918.14 0.23 2.36 8.39 159.86 0.03 0.36 1.61 0.73 136.07 0.03 0.90 3.17 156.77 0.04 0.95 2.22
261 866.30 5.44 17.28 20.75 224.95 0.47 4.17 6.06 0.69 55.22 0.07 1.14 2.82 80.57 0.20 2.34 3.16
263 2649.00 6.66 12.71 12.85 138.01 0.12 1.59 3.33 0.51 223.70 0.21 0.66 1.86 209.80 0.19 0.92 0.83
265 650.68 0.17 17.01 11.40 190.92 0.05 5.19 3.71 0.58 99.69 0.04 2.46 2.15 89.77 0.02 2.12 1.56
266 1789.35 5.53 8.54 12.40 501.80 1.39 2.37 4.06 0.65 146.43 0.22 1.20 1.84 171.96 0.25 1.00 2.31
267 2278.89 1.40 17.15 15.49 465.77 0.19 4.33 2.40 0.91 292.72 0.06 3.09 1.43 10.68 0.01 0.33 0.53
269 2914.10 1.79 14.57 15.90 514.99 0.34 3.21 2.11 0.85 38.89 0.02 0.19 0.71 29.37 0.30 0.04 0.11
271 712.81 0.12 18.59 11.45 250.02 0.03 6.53 3.05 0.61 52.64 0.02 1.53 1.72 73.90 0.01 1.68 1.65
401 782.23 3.61 8.17 22.75 233.56 0.90 1.54 3.72 0.49 50.84 0.14 1.14 2.41 44.87 0.05 0.39 0.79
941 519.67 2.09 9.59 12.62 143.33 0.26 2.33 4.30 0.58 66.09 0.10 1.09 2.70 77.18 0.15 1.24 2.37
1551 515.21 4.46 4.64 12.71 166.08 0.54 1.07 5.55 0.51 71.73 0.20 0.69 3.05 295.68 1.93 0.94 3.00
1561 1282.68 4.50 3.02 12.08 245.70 0.48 0.76 3.61 0.84 89.45 0.16 1.11 2.93 78.62 0.16 0.98 3.12
2151 1310.77 5.60 3.24 7.18 246.33 1.13 0.58 2.23 0.71 136.56 1.47 1.60 3.99 87.13 0.49 0.57 2.05
2291 1564.51 9.65 8.84 9.65 445.33 1.15 1.63 3.52 0.68 79.10 0.13 0.43 1.89 127.32 0.11 1.63 3.12
14.6.1 Variography
Experimental variograms were calculated and modelled in Snowden Supervisor software using capped full-
length composites for each domain (ore, HW, and FW). Variograms directions were validated against vein
outlines. While the mineralization domain lacked sufficient samples to obtain robust variograms, the results
were useful in supporting the range of expected grade continuity. The variograms were exported to
Datamine format to use in the estimation process.
Table 14.5 summarize the variogram parameters for each metal for all domains.
Table 14.5 Variogram parameters
ROTATION RANGES
Domain Metals NUGGET Co SILL C1/C2
Z X Z X Y Z
AGPPM 0.00 1.00 80 45 180 50 23 6
CUPERC 0.01 0.99 80 45 150 36 32 6
4
PBPERC 0.31 0.69 80 45 180 44 25 6
ZNPERC 0.36 0.64 80 45 180 26 46 6
AGPPM 0.44 0.56 170 70 180 28 26 30
CUPERC 0.29 0.71 170 70 180 34 29 30
13
PBPERC 0.22 0.78 170 70 180 26 28 30
ZNPERC 0.00 1.00 170 70 180 30 89 29
AGPPM 0.44 0.56 80 90 180 44 33 18
CUPERC 0.32 0.68 80 90 180 50 35 18
19
PBPERC 0.00 1.00 80 90 180 42 20 18
ZNPERC 0.26 0.74 80 90 180 28 14 18
AGPPM 0.25 0.76 90 110 -170 30 25 12
CUPERC 0.16 0.84 80 110 -170 40 69 12
24
PBPERC 0.16 0.84 90 110 160 26 47 18
ZNPERC 0.47 0.53 90 110 180 59 73 24
AGPPM 0.04 0.97 180 90 180 23 45 6
CUPERC 0.07 0.93 180 90 180 26 45 3
30
PBPERC 0.23 0.77 180 90 180 30 43 3
ZNPERC 0.28 0.72 180 90 180 22 60 6
AGPPM 0.17 0.83 140 100 100 56 50 10
CUPERC 0.02 0.99 140 100 100 47 50 10
34
PBPERC 0.00 1.00 140 100 100 41 35 10
ZNPERC 0.11 0.89 140 100 100 56 57 10
AGPPM 0.06 0.94 170 105 180 13 26 9
CUPERC 0.12 0.89 170 105 180 40 55 9
38
PBPERC 0.24 0.76 170 105 180 16 34 9
ZNPERC 0.00 1.00 170 105 180 27 40 9
AGPPM 0.00 1.00 70 65 40 52 33 3
CUPERC 0.00 1.00 70 70 40 35 22 3
40
PBPERC 0.00 1.00 70 70 20 51 20 3
ZNPERC 0.00 1.00 70 70 40 44 20 3
ROTATION RANGES
Domain Metals NUGGET Co SILL C1/C2
Z X Z X Y Z
AGPPM 0.42 0.58 180 110 180 69 30 40
CUPERC 0.43 0.57 175 110 180 111 20 10
44
PBPERC 0.36 0.64 175 110 -175 65 38 15
ZNPERC 0.33 0.67 175 110 180 60 20 15
AGPPM 0.25 0.75 170 105 -170 30 62 8
CUPERC 0.00 1.00 180 105 145 75 65 8
57
PBPERC 0.17 0.59 -180 105 -140 19 50 5
ZNPERC 0.15 0.85 170 105 -140 25 42 8
AGPPM 0.14 0.86 180 70 -100 43 50 6
CUPERC 0.15 0.85 -180 70 170 42 32 6
58
PBPERC 0.12 0.88 -180 70 170 22 24 6
ZNPERC 0.25 0.75 -180 70 170 17 28 6
AGPPM 0.15 0.85 70 70 170 30 41 5
CUPERC 0.09 0.91 70 70 -170 51 31 6
63
PBPERC 0.07 0.93 70 70 170 30 25 6
ZNPERC 0.00 1.00 80 70 170 25 40 5
AGPPM 0.25 0.75 165 105 90 73 50 9
CUPERC 0.30 0.70 165 105 90 61 50 9
91
PBPERC 0.00 1.00 165 105 90 87 33 9
ZNPERC 0.00 1.00 165 105 90 70 31 9
AGPPM 0.46 0.54 55 60 180 51 40 8
CUPERC 0.27 0.73 55 60 180 21 40 8
94
PBPERC 0.32 0.69 55 60 180 25 40 8
ZNPERC 0.54 0.46 55 60 180 22 35 8
AGPPM 0.00 1.00 170 90 170 34 32 8
CUPERC 0.00 1.00 170 90 170 30 32 5
98
PBPERC 0.06 1.00 170 90 170 13 65 8
ZNPERC 0.06 0.94 170 90 170 20 50 6
AGPPM 0.34 0.67 180 85 170 46 40 7
CUPERC 0.27 0.74 180 85 170 81 40 7
102
PBPERC 0.22 0.78 180 85 170 39 42 6
ZNPERC 0.30 0.70 180 85 170 84 40 4
AGPPM 0.00 0.99 -155 85 -150 42 26 5
CUPERC 0.00 1.00 -155 85 -170 38 50 7
103
PBPERC 0.00 1.00 -155 85 -170 50 19 7
ZNPERC 0.00 0.99 -155 85 -170 70 21 6
AGPPM 0.40 0.60 110 85 170 40 45 16
CUPERC 0.16 0.84 110 85 170 42 15 9
104
PBPERC 0.45 0.56 110 95 140 48 27 5
ZNPERC 0.00 1.00 110 90 140 42 27 5
AGPPM 0.21 0.79 175 95 175 32 40 5
CUPERC 0.22 0.78 175 95 175 30 27 5
106
PBPERC 0.19 0.81 175 95 175 45 39 6
ZNPERC 0.17 0.83 175 95 175 46 34 5
ROTATION RANGES
Domain Metals NUGGET Co SILL C1/C2
Z X Z X Y Z
AGPPM 0.14 0.86 170 100 140 40 62 12
CUPERC 0.13 0.87 170 100 140 48 62 5
107
PBPERC 0.48 0.52 170 100 170 48 80 7
ZNPERC 0.34 0.66 170 100 170 62 96 7
AGPPM 0.00 1.00 165 110 180 40 65 13
CUPERC 0.00 1.00 165 110 165 62 22 13
108
PBPERC 0.00 1.00 165 110 155 50 18 8
ZNPERC 0.00 1.00 165 100 180 30 36 13
AGPPM 0.13 0.88 160 120 180 23 55 8
CUPERC 0.19 0.81 150 120 180 54 50 8
109
PBPERC 0.19 0.81 150 120 180 60 40 8
ZNPERC 0.00 1.00 150 120 180 45 128 8
AGPPM 0.00 1.00 170 100 180 24 24 10
CUPERC 0.00 1.00 170 100 180 15 24 7
1551
PBPERC 0.00 1.00 170 100 180 35 24 6
ZNPERC 0.00 1.00 170 100 180 24 24 8
AGPPM 0.00 1.00 0 70 -30 44 31 12
CUPERC 0.19 0.82 0 70 10 60 28 6
155
PBPERC 0.00 1.00 180 110 135 30 33 6
ZNPERC 0.00 1.00 0 70 -45 31 36 10
AGPPM 0.29 0.71 -50 70 -40 100 109 20
CUPERC 0.32 0.68 -50 70 -40 85 81 20
156
PBPERC 0.27 0.73 -50 70 -40 111 93 20
ZNPERC 0.22 0.78 -50 70 -40 100 105 20
AGPPM 0.00 0.99 130 100 80 42 38 2
CUPERC 0.00 0.99 130 100 80 35 20 2
1561
PBPERC 0.00 0.99 145 105 80 35 33 2
ZNPERC 0.00 0.99 145 105 80 35 33 2
AGPPM 0.49 0.51 160 105 -90 82 39 4
CUPERC 0.48 0.52 160 105 -90 40 63 4
213
PBPERC 0.31 0.69 160 105 -90 20 28 4
ZNPERC 0.00 1.00 160 105 -90 22 18 4
AGPPM 0.18 0.82 75 70 -120 43 82 10
CUPERC 0.00 1.00 75 70 -120 40 65 20
215
PBPERC 0.27 0.73 75 70 -120 40 46 10
ZNPERC 0.00 1.00 75 70 -120 43 36 10
AGPPM 0.05 0.95 170 80 -170 38 45 4
CUPERC 0.05 0.95 170 80 -170 38 45 4
217
PBPERC 0.05 0.95 170 80 170 34 12 4
ZNPERC 0.05 0.95 170 80 -170 55 47 4
AGPPM 0.29 0.71 135 100 90 74 20 0
CUPERC 0.01 0.99 135 100 90 42 10 0
219
PBPERC 0.15 0.85 135 100 90 77 10 0
ZNPERC 0.00 1.00 135 100 90 74 10 0
ROTATION RANGES
Domain Metals NUGGET Co SILL C1/C2
Z X Z X Y Z
AGPPM 0.23 0.77 -140 70 180 30 22 4
CUPERC 0.00 1.00 -150 70 -170 13 28 4
222
PBPERC 0.00 1.00 -150 70 -170 30 24 4
ZNPERC 0.22 0.78 -145 70 -170 10 15 4
AGPPM 0.04 0.96 10 80 70 22 23 20
CUPERC 0.05 0.95 10 80 70 22 23 20
229
PBPERC 0.03 0.97 10 80 70 22 23 20
ZNPERC 0.03 0.97 10 80 70 22 25 20
AGPPM 0.06 0.94 180 110 130 26 26 10
CUPERC 0.02 0.98 0 60 -60 44 41 10
2291
PBPERC 0.06 0.94 180 120 180 12 30 10
ZNPERC 0.05 0.95 0 60 0 23 31 10
AGPPM 0.00 1.00 0 0 -170 16 11 15
CUPERC 0.00 1.00 0 0 180 19 11 15
233
PBPERC 0.00 1.00 0 0 180 19 14 15
ZNPERC 0.00 1.00 0 0 180 35 22 15
AGPPM 0.27 0.73 130 90 50 40 40 10
CUPERC 0.06 0.94 130 90 50 40 38 10
235
PBPERC 0.18 0.82 130 90 50 48 45 10
ZNPERC 0.04 0.96 130 90 50 25 40 10
AGPPM 0.00 1.00 -80 20 -30 55 40 6
CUPERC 0.00 1.00 -80 20 -30 55 40 6
241
PBPERC 0.23 0.77 -80 20 -10 37 40 6
ZNPERC 0.00 1.00 -80 20 -10 23 40 6
AGPPM 0.12 0.88 60 20 180 23 45 6
CUPERC 0.00 1.00 60 20 180 30 45 6
250
PBPERC 0.02 0.73 60 20 180 4 60 3
ZNPERC 0.01 0.99 60 20 180 38 28 6
AGPPM 0.18 0.83 -170 90 180 16 42 15
CUPERC 0.24 0.76 -170 90 180 48 50 15
256
PBPERC 0.29 0.71 -170 90 180 34 60 15
ZNPERC 0.06 0.94 -170 90 180 50 120 15
AGPPM 0.08 0.92 170 110 130 65 40 10
CUPERC 0.09 0.91 170 110 130 65 40 10
257
PBPERC 0.11 0.90 170 110 130 34 31 10
ZNPERC 0.08 0.92 170 110 130 41 52 10
AGPPM 0.28 0.72 160 110 180 31 35 8
CUPERC 0.00 1.00 160 110 160 20 25 8
258
PBPERC 0.64 0.36 160 110 180 16 55 6
ZNPERC 0.27 0.73 160 110 180 41 45 8
AGPPM 0.00 1.00 65 65 95 30 26 5
CUPERC 0.00 1.00 65 65 95 40 32 5
261
PBPERC 0.00 1.00 60 65 95 42 28 5
ZNPERC 0.00 1.00 65 65 95 32 30 5
ROTATION RANGES
Domain Metals NUGGET Co SILL C1/C2
Z X Z X Y Z
AGPPM 0.48 0.52 -10 80 -90 36 32 6
CUPERC 0.43 0.57 -10 80 -90 42 28 6
263
PBPERC 0.53 0.47 -10 80 -90 30 32 6
ZNPERC 0.42 0.58 -10 80 -90 30 17 6
AGPPM 0.01 0.99 5 70 90 67 32 6
CUPERC 0.02 0.98 5 70 90 75 44 6
265
PBPERC 0.11 0.89 5 70 90 89 30 6
ZNPERC 0.21 0.79 5 70 90 92 42 6
AGPPM 0.00 1.00 180 110 180 37 28 10
CUPERC 0.09 0.91 0 70 0 38 42 10
267
PBPERC 0.00 1.00 0 60 0 19 31 10
ZNPERC 0.17 0.83 0 60 0 23 31 10
AGPPM 0.23 0.77 -175 80 180 24 40 40
CUPERC 0.23 0.77 -175 80 180 23 35 40
269
PBPERC 0.23 0.77 -175 80 180 35 40 40
ZNPERC 0.25 0.75 -175 80 180 90 40 40
AGPPM 0.09 0.91 180 85 180 37 20 10
CUPERC 0.24 0.77 180 85 180 52 20 10
271
PBPERC 0.09 0.91 180 85 180 39 20 10
ZNPERC 0.09 0.91 180 85 180 40 50 10
Figure 14.5 is an example of the silver variogram for the Juanita Ramal vein.
Figure 14.5 Variogram of Ag at Juanita Ramal
Domain Type X Y Z
Base Point (m) 343813.00 8781467.00 4060
Parent Block Size (m) 5.00 5.00 5
40
Min. Sub-block Size (m) 0.25 0.25 0
Number of cells 31.00 58.00 50
Base Point (m) 343774.00 8781606.00 4064
Parent Block Size (m) 5.00 5.00 5
401
Min. Sub-block Size (m) 0.25 0.25 0
Number of cells 44.00 40.00 5
Base Point (m) 343307.00 8782715.00 3
Parent Block Size (m) 5.00 5.00 5
44
Min. Sub-block Size (m) 0.25 0.25 0
Number of cells 242.00 47.00 72
Base Point (m) 344086.00 8782298.00 4113
Parent Block Size (m) 5.00 5.00 5
57
Min. Sub-block Size (m) 0.25 0.25 0
Number of cells 96.00 34.00 119
Base Point (m) 343486.00 8781577.00 3969
Parent Block Size (m) 5.00 5.00 5
58
Min. Sub-block Size (m) 0.25 0.25 0
Number of cells 235.00 84.00 135
Base Point (m) 343568.00 8781977.00 4070
Parent Block Size (m) 5.00 5.00 5
63
Min. Sub-block Size (m) 0.25 0.25 0
Number of cells 43.00 111.00 56
Base Point (m) 343430.00 8782197.00 4071
Parent Block Size (m) 5.00 5.00 5
88
Min. Sub-block Size (m) 0.25 0.25 0
Number of cells 81.00 16.00 43
Base Point (m) 344335.00 8782400.00 4568
Parent Block Size (m) 5.00 5.00 5
90
Min. Sub-block Size (m) 0.25 0.25 0
Number of cells 42.00 9.00 31
Base Point (m) 343844.00 8782386.00 3997
Parent Block Size (m) 5.00 5.00 5
91
Min. Sub-block Size (m) 0.50 0.50 1
Number of cells 202.00 55.00 152
Base Point (m) 344072.00 8782269.00 4005
Parent Block Size (m) 5.00 5.00 5
94
Min. Sub-block Size (m) 0.25 0.25 0
Number of cells 69.00 72.00 108
Base Point (m) 344312.00 8782313.00 4079
Parent Block Size (m) 5.00 5.00 5
941
Min. Sub-block Size (m) 0.25 0.25 0
Number of cells 24.00 18.00 36
Domain Type X Y Z
Base Point (m) 343259.00 8781402.00 3988
Parent Block Size (m) 5.00 5.00 5
98
Min. Sub-block Size (m) 0.25 0.25 0
Number of cells 118.00 20.00 68
Base Point (m) 345135.00 8783088.00 4014
Parent Block Size (m) 5.00 5.00 5
102
Min. Sub-block Size (m) 0.25 0.25 0
Number of cells 143.00 15.00 68
Base Point (m) 344885.00 8783119.00 4153
Parent Block Size (m) 5.00 5.00 5
103
Min. Sub-block Size (m) 0.25 0.25 0
Number of cells 55.00 29.00 61
Base Point (m) 343714.00 8781348.00 4068
Parent Block Size (m) 5.00 5.00 5
104
Min. Sub-block Size (m) 0.25 0.25 0
Number of cells 56.00 225.00 88
Base Point (m) 345239.00 8783102.00 4209
Parent Block Size (m) 5.00 5.00 5
106
Min. Sub-block Size (m) 0.25 0.25 0
Number of cells 74.00 10.00 65
Base Point (m) 343382.00 8781758.00 3983
Parent Block Size (m) 5.00 5.00 5
107
Min. Sub-block Size (m) 0.25 0.25 0
Number of cells 211.00 65.00 138
Base Point (m) 343341.00 8782155.00 3938
Parent Block Size (m) 5.00 5.00 5
108
Min. Sub-block Size (m) 0.25 0.25 0
Number of cells 212.00 58.00 77
Base Point (m) 344612.00 8782673.00 4198
Parent Block Size (m) 5.00 5.00 5
109
Min. Sub-block Size (m) 0.25 0.25 0
Number of cells 102.00 93.00 87
Base Point (m) 344236.00 8782663.00 4552
Parent Block Size (m) 5.00 5.00 5
116
Min. Sub-block Size (m) 0.25 0.25 0
Number of cells 53.00 14.00 41
Base Point (m) 343304.00 8782841.00 3991
Parent Block Size (m) 5.00 5.00 5
1551
Min. Sub-block Size (m) 0.25 0.25 0
Number of cells 153.00 28.00 68
Base Point (m) 344760.61 8782806.00 4064
Parent Block Size (m) 5.00 5.00 5
155
Min. Sub-block Size (m) 0.25 0.25 0
Number of cells 44.00 20.00 82
Domain Type X Y Z
Base Point (m) 344266.00 8782237.00 3983
Parent Block Size (m) 5.00 5.00 5
156
Min. Sub-block Size (m) 0.25 0.25 0
Number of cells 203.00 192.00 153
Base Point (m) 344775.00 8782706.00 3983
Parent Block Size (m) 5.00 5.00 5
1561
Min. Sub-block Size (m) 0.25 0.25 0
Number of cells 105.00 100.00 136
Base Point (m) 344545.00 8782319.00 4516
Parent Block Size (m) 5.00 5.00 5
157
Min. Sub-block Size (m) 0.25 0.25 0
Number of cells 28.00 26.00 25
Base Point (m) 344100.00 8781500.00 4100
Parent Block Size (m) 5.00 5.00 5
158
Min. Sub-block Size (m) 0.25 0.25 0
Number of cells 140.00 65.00 80
Base Point (m) 343100.00 8782140.00 3900
Parent Block Size (m) 5.00 5.00 5
213
Min. Sub-block Size (m) 0.50 0.50 1
Number of cells 300.00 132.00 120
Base Point (m) 343400.00 878200.00 4000
Parent Block Size (m) 5.00 5.00 5
215
Min. Sub-block Size (m) 0.50 0.50 1
Number of cells 120.00 160.00 92
Base Point (m) 343200.00 8782900.00 3900
Parent Block Size (m) 5.00 5.00 5
217
Min. Sub-block Size (m) 0.50 0.50 1
Number of cells 200.00 60.00 92
Base Point (m) 343260.00 8781120.00 3900
Parent Block Size (m) 5.00 5.00 5
219
Min. Sub-block Size (m) 0.50 0.50 1
Number of cells 148.00 104.00 92
Base Point (m) 343460.00 8781860.00 4000
Parent Block Size (m) 5.00 5.00 5
221
Min. Sub-block Size (m) 0.50 0.50 1
Number of cells 88.00 140.00 60
Base Point (m) 343728.00 8781416.00 4052
Parent Block Size (m) 5.00 5.00 5
222
Min. Sub-block Size (m) 0.50 0.50 1
Number of cells 37.00 32.00 56
Base Point (m) 345260.00 8783100.00 4100
Parent Block Size (m) 5.00 5.00 5
225
Min. Sub-block Size (m) 0.50 0.50 1
Number of cells 60.00 20.00 60
Domain Type X Y Z
Base Point (m) 343360.00 8782040.00 4000
Parent Block Size (m) 5.00 5.00 5
228
Min. Sub-block Size (m) 0.50 0.50 1
Number of cells 124.00 28.00 80
Base Point (m) 343400.00 8782200.00 4000
Parent Block Size (m) 5.00 5.00 5
229
Min. Sub-block Size (m) 0.50 0.50 1
Number of cells 100.00 60.00 60
Base Point (m) 343400.00 8782200.00 4000
Parent Block Size (m) 5.00 5.00 5
2291
Min. Sub-block Size (m) 0.50 0.50 1
Number of cells 100.00 60.00 60
Base Point (m) 344500.00 8781200.00 4500
Parent Block Size (m) 5.00 5.00 5
230
Min. Sub-block Size (m) 0.50 0.50 1
Number of cells 60.00 56.00 60
Base Point (m) 344560.00 8781320.00 4400
Parent Block Size (m) 5.00 5.00 5
231
Min. Sub-block Size (m) 0.50 0.50 1
Number of cells 36.00 44.00 60
Base Point (m) 344860.00 8783100.00 4000
Parent Block Size (m) 5.00 5.00 5
233
Min. Sub-block Size (m) 0.50 0.50 1
Number of cells 108.00 36.00 100
Base Point (m) 343660.00 8781680.00 4500
Parent Block Size (m) 5.00 5.00 5
234
Min. Sub-block Size (m) 0.50 0.50 1
Number of cells 32.00 40.00 40
Base Point (m) 343620.00 8781660.00 3900
Parent Block Size (m) 5.00 5.00 5
235
Min. Sub-block Size (m) 0.50 0.50 1
Number of cells 76.00 100.00 80
Base Point (m) 344140.00 8780960.00 4200
Parent Block Size (m) 5.00 5.00 5
238
Min. Sub-block Size (m) 0.50 0.50 1
Number of cells 72.00 40.00 32
Base Point (m) 343180.00 8782100.00 4300
Parent Block Size (m) 5.00 5.00 5
241
Min. Sub-block Size (m) 0.50 0.50 1
Number of cells 144.00 140.00 60
Base Point (m) 345680.00 8782600.00 4100
Parent Block Size (m) 5.00 5.00 5
250
Min. Sub-block Size (m) 0.50 0.50 1
Number of cells 156.00 160.00 84
Domain Type X Y Z
Base Point (m) 345340.00 8783000.00 4200
Parent Block Size (m) 5.00 5.00 5
254
Min. Sub-block Size (m) 0.50 0.50 1
Number of cells 24.00 20.00 40
Base Point (m) 344600.00 8782640.00 4100
Parent Block Size (m) 5.00 5.00 5
256
Min. Sub-block Size (m) 0.50 0.50 1
Number of cells 100.00 32.00 80
Base Point (m) 345800.00 8783100.00 4100
Parent Block Size (m) 5.00 5.00 5
257
Min. Sub-block Size (m) 0.50 0.50 1
Number of cells 68.00 28.00 60
Base Point (m) 345700.00 8783100.00 4100
Parent Block Size (m) 5.00 5.00 5
258
Min. Sub-block Size (m) 0.50 0.50 1
Number of cells 80.00 40.00 60
Base Point (m) 345820.00 8783080.00 4100
Parent Block Size (m) 5.00 5.00 5
260
Min. Sub-block Size (m) 0.50 0.50 1
Number of cells 32.00 32.00 60
Base Point (m) 344000.00 8782280.00 4000
Parent Block Size (m) 5.00 5.00 5
261
Min. Sub-block Size (m) 0.50 0.50 1
Number of cells 80.00 84.00 120
Base Point (m) 344920.00 8783140.00 4200
Parent Block Size (m) 5.00 5.00 5
263
Min. Sub-block Size (m) 0.50 0.50 1
Number of cells 40.00 20.00 60
Base Point (m) 344300.00 8781400.00 4200
Parent Block Size (m) 5.00 5.00 5
265
Min. Sub-block Size (m) 0.50 0.50 1
Number of cells 110.00 70.00 100
Base Point (m) 344300.00 8781400.00 4200
Parent Block Size (m) 5.00 5.00 5
266
Min. Sub-block Size (m) 0.50 0.50 1
Number of cells 110.00 70.00 100
Base Point (m) 343300.00 8782820.00 4000
Parent Block Size (m) 5.00 5.00 5
267
Min. Sub-block Size (m) 0.50 0.50 1
Number of cells 128.00 60.00 100
Domain Type X Y Z
Base Point (m) 343320.00 8782975.00 4000
Parent Block Size (m) 5.00 5.00 5
269
Min. Sub-block Size (m) 0.50 0.50 1
Number of cells 72.00 25.00 60
Base Point (m) 344380.00 8781520.00 4300
Parent Block Size (m) 5.00 5.00 5
271
Min. Sub-block Size (m) 0.50 0.50 1
Number of cells 48.00 16.00 60
14.10 Estimation
Estimation was carried out within the individual mineralization domains representing vein structures within
Datamine software using capped composites and a multi-pass OK or ID2 interpolation approach. While
individual blocks were not classified, mining panels were classified considering local drillhole spacing and
proximity to existing development.
Mineral Reserve estimates are based on assumptions that included mining, metallurgical, infrastructure,
permitting, taxation, and economic parameters. Increasing costs and taxation and lower metal prices will
have a negative impact on the quantity of Mineral Reserve estimates. There are no other known factors that
may have a material impact on the Mineral Reserve estimates at Huaron.
15.2 Method
Mineral Resource blocks classified as Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources that can be mined
economically are converted to Mineral Reserves. Some small isolated blocks may be removed if the cost and
the logistics make them uneconomic to mine. A VPT is applied to each block based on metal content, metal
prices, concentrate sales terms, concentrate quality, metallurgical recovery, transportation, refining, and
other selling costs such as storage fees, port fees, etc. A minimum required VPT cut-off is calculated for the
blocks depending on the block location and the mining method used to mine the block. Processing costs are
assumed to be the same for all ore types, and metallurgical recoveries are determined separately for each
group of veins or structures to account for variability in the metal recovery. Metal prices used in the Mineral
Reserve estimates were $19 per ounce of silver, $2,000 per tonne of lead, $2,600 per tonne of zinc, and
$7,000 per tonne of copper.
Any blocks which are considered uneconomic after these parameters are applied either remain as Mineral
Resources or may be removed from the inventory completely if they do not meet the criteria of Resources.
The Mineral Reserves are classified as Proven or Probable depending on the Mineral Resource classification.
Table 15.1 Huaron unit costs considered for reserves cut-off value estimation
Description Total ($/t)
Mine 32.46
Processing 5.78
Water treatment 0.59
Planning & engineering 1.55
Geology 1.65
Safety and environmental 3.25
General maintenance 12.20
Electrical system 7.93
Camp administration 11.48
Lima administration 7.16
Breakeven cut-off value Huaron 84.05
Subtract management fee Canada -0.33
Add tailings dam LOM capital 5.82
Full cost value Huaron 89.54
Incremental cut-off value 80.59
An incremental cut-off value is utilized as on balance there is excess mill capacity available, which in this
typical example is $80.59/t or 90% of the full cost value for Huaron (Table 15.1). The tailings dam LOM
capital of $5.82/t includes the cost of tailings pressure filtration and stacking from 2025 to the end of the
mine life.
The VPT calculation that is applied to each of the mineral resource blocks accounts for metallurgical
recovery and the costs associated with royalties and concentrate transportation and treatment for each of
the major structures.
16 MINING METHODS
16.1 Mining methods
Mining is undertaken using a combination of mechanized cut and fill (C&F) and mechanized sub-level open
stoping (SLOS) methods. The overall geometry of the Huaron orebody is shown in Figure 16.1 as a plan view
of the 33 domains in the underground.
Figure 16.1 Plan view of Huaron underground
The selection of the mining method depends on the location, width, and orientation of the vein to be mined,
as well as the ground conditions of the FW and HW. The following sections will further describe the mining
methods and their application.
The minimum mining width for SLOS is 1.0 m and planned dilution is included in the mine design. Dilution
estimates vary according to the ground conditions, mining method, vein width and the dip of the vein. The
dilution factors range from 9% to 36% for planned dilution (LOM average is approximately 24%) and
unplanned floor dilution is 7%. In the SLOS areas, dilution is reconciled using a cavity monitoring survey and
comparing actual to design. This methodology is used to determine the planned dilution of SLOS for each
vein in the orebody.
Generally, for across orebody width (FW to HW thickness) of 10 m or less, the stope will be developed as
longitudinal C&F. The mining begins by driving the level access to the FW contact of Lift 1 and then the drive
is extended flat (zero gradient) to the HW contact of the ore. Next, the ore is mined longitudinally in a single
pass along strike in both directions to the limits of the orebody. Any remaining ore on the HW side will be
slashed out on retreat and then the drift will be backfilled.
The initial backfill material placed in the stope is waste rock from development in the mine, which is evenly
distributed with a scoop along the length of the stope to fill approximately 80% of the void. The remainder
of the stope is backfilled with cyclones mill tailings on top of the rockfill, which is piped into the SLOS. It is
further noted that uneconomic materials in the stope is typically blasted down and left as backfill.
Once the stope has been backfilled the level access will be TDB to provide access for the next lift, and the
process will be repeated for subsequent lifts.
The minimum mining width for C&F is 1.5 m and planned dilution is included in the mine design. Dilution
estimates vary according to the ground conditions, mining method, vein width, and the dip of the vein. The
dilution factors range from 18% to 31% for planned dilution (LOM average is approximately 26%), and
unplanned floor dilution is 5%. In C&F mining the width of the stope is surveyed on a regular basis as mining
advances and compared to the actual vein width. This reconciliation is the methodology for determining the
planned dilution of C&F stopes for each vein in the orebody.
16.4 Personnel
The mine currently operates 24 hours per day, seven days per week on two shifts per day for a total of 14
worked shifts per week. Support staff at the mine works only a single shift.
The operation currently has a full complement of 1,554 workers with a production rate of one Mtpa.
The mine has been reducing the use of third-party contractors but still relies on contractors for several
important aspects of the underground mine. These include drilling; mine development; stope preparation
and mining in the south zone of the mine; raise boring; the preparation, transport, and application of wet
mix shotcrete; and truck haulage of plant feed for processing up the mine ramp to surface stockpiles.
16.5 Geotechnical
Pan American’s minimum ground support policy is to support each round after blasting with rock bolts.
Inflatable Swellex style rock bolts are installed around the excavation profile with sacrificial Splits Sets and
mesh used to support the face.
The sites team of geotechnical engineers routinely inspect the mines workings identifying any areas that do
not satisfy the site geotechnical standards. Remediation plans are issued using a ground support design
matrix that considers ground conditions, the degree of rock fracturing, joint conditions and the excavation
size. The matrix also specifies a bolting pattern and any surface support requirements that may be required
(which typically include weld mesh and / or fibre-reinforced shotcrete). To control any atypical conditions,
ground support elements such as heavy gauge straps, rapid set and / or high strength fibre-reinforced
shotcrete, steel arches and wooden lagging are also available for use. QA/QC programs are in place to
ensure rock bolts and shotcrete are installed and perform to design specifications.
Excavation dimensions typically range between 2.5 m to 4.5 m wide and 3.0 m to 4.5 m high. Historically
rock bolt installation was completed manually using jacklegs, however, mechanized techniques are now
used with Resemin Muki and Raptor jumbos. Fibre-reinforced shotcrete is batched on surface, then
transported underground and sprayed robotically.
SLOS stope stability designs are evaluated using industry standard empirical technics such as the Mathews
Stability Method and Equivalent Linear Overbreak Slough (ELOS) methods.
The ground support standards were last updated in the third quarter of 2022 and when required the
engineers will seek technical assistance from third-party geotechnical consultants.
16.7 Backfill
The backfill for C&F is rockfill from waste development. If additional rockfill is required, the Huaron mine has
a waste rock stockpile on surface that can be trucked underground.
The backfill for SLOS is a mixture of rockfill (approximately 80% by volume) and cycloned tailing (20% by
volume) from the mill. The initial backfill material placed in the SLOS is development waste rock, which is
distributed with a scoop along the length of the stope to fill approximately 70% of the void. The remainder
of the stope is backfilled with a cap on top of the waste rock using cycloned mill tailings that is transported
hydraulically by pipe into the stope. Cement is added occasionally to the waste rock to make a cemented
rockfill product that results in a pillar which is stable upon exposure.
16.8 Ventilation
Two means of egress are provided for each production area of the mine. The primary means of egress is via
the haulage ramps and secondary egress is via a series of internal ladderways located within raises with
ladderways and crossover drifts.
• Ramps are located in fresh air and once developed may be used for either up- or down ramp egress.
• Egress from almost all levels is either using the haulage ramp or by the escape ladderway in the
internal raises.
• Portable refuge chambers are installed in close proximity to active working areas of the mine.
• Huaron’s primary means of communication is radio, however, a secondary stench gas system is
installed to release ethyl mercaptan into the ventilation and compressed air systems in the event of
fire.
The deepest mining level at Huaron is the 100 Level which is located 150 m vertically below the Paul
Nevejans drainage tunnel. The 100 Level was developed with a pumping station that included a backup
diesel generated power supply to pump any water inflows to the Paul Nevejans drainage tunnel.
The bottom level of the current Mineral Reserve and LOM is assumed to be the 100 Level. Mineralization
characteristics that have already been extracted from the 100 Level do not appear to differ significantly (in
terms of grade and geometry) to the same structures encountered higher up on the 180 Level. This supports
the theory that these veins and structures potentially continue at depth below the 100 Level.
An economic evaluation of the resource and mineral extraction below the 100 Level has not yet been
completed. The processing plant is approaching its maximum designed capacity and any increases in plant
throughput further without increasing the crushing, grinding, and flotation capacity of the plant would result
in reduced metal recovery. Some studies have been conducted into incrementally increasing the capacity of
the processing plant; however, the economics of a mine expansion have not been quantified at this time.
17 RECOVERY METHODS
17.1 Introduction
Huaron mine operates a 3,200 tpd mill with froth induced flotation to produce silver in copper, lead, and
zinc concentrates. The mill flowsheet consists of a three-stage crushing circuit, ball mill grinding and
selective flotation of the ore to concentrates, followed by thickening and filtering of the concentrates. A
portion of the tailings from the process are cycloned to produce sands for backfill material for the
underground mining operation, and the fines and rest of tailings are deposited into a tailing impoundment
facility.
The processing plant at Huaron has been modified multiple times since 2015 to improve operations. These
modifications include:
• Additional cyclones to improve size classification.
• Addition of rougher flotation cells, a conditioner cell, and cleaner cells to the zinc circuit to increase
residence time, depress iron minerals, and improve zinc concentrate quality.
• Addition of lead flotation cells to improve quality of the lead and copper concentrates.
• Addition of a high frequency screen ahead of the bulk flotation to remove trash from the pulp.
17.2 Crushing
Ore is delivered from the mine to a 15,000-tonne capacity stockpile where the ore is classified by
metallurgical characteristics to obtain an optimal ore blend for processing through the plant. The blended
material is fed into a 100-tonne capacity coarse ore bin where it is reclaimed by an apron feeder to a
vibrating grizzly. The oversize from the grizzly is reduced in size by a jaw crusher to 3.5 inches and rejoined
with the grizzly undersize onto a conveyor which feeds a vibrating screen. The oversize material reports to
the secondary cone crushers where it is reduced to a 2.5-inch product size then joins the undersize via
conveyor to another vibrating screen. The oversize material reports to a tertiary short head cone crusher
where it is reduced in size to 100% passing one quarter inch. The undersize product travels by conveyor belt
equipped with an electromagnetic separator and metal detector for storage in three 300 tonne capacity fine
ore bins prior to entering the grinding circuit.
17.4 Flotation
The pulp from the grinding circuit is fed to the flotation circuit. The flotation circuit includes an initial stage
of depression of zinc and flotation of a bulk concentrate. The bulk concentrate consists of lead and copper
and is treated with sodium dichromate to separate and produce a silver rich lead and copper concentrate.
The tailings from the bulk flotation are activated and conditioned with copper sulphate and lime to modify
the pH and to produce a zinc concentrate. The bulk flotation occurs in three stages of roughing, three stages
of cleaning, and three stages of scavenging. The cleaning concentrate is sent to the copper-lead separation
circuit while the scavenger tails are pumped to a zinc flotation circuit. The copper-lead separation circuit
consists of the flotation of copper through one conditioning tank, one stage of roughing, three stages of
cleaning, and one scavenging stage, while the lead concentrates are produced from the scavenger tails. The
zinc flotation circuit includes three conditioning tanks, three stages of roughing, three stages of cleaning,
and two stages of scavenging to produce the zinc concentrate. The final flotation plant residues are
produced in the zinc flotation circuit from the second scavenger tails.
Recent test work performed by Pocock Industrial indicates that the tailings are amenable to pressure
filtration to produce a stackable product and engineering design for a filtered-stacked tailings facility is
currently in progress. The filtered-stacked facility considers thickening the mill tailings before pressure
filtration to produce a filter cake with a moisture content of approximately 15% by weight. The tailings filter
cake will discharge to a concrete collection bunker where it will be reclaimed into trucks to be delivered to
the filtered-tailings storage facility. Filtrate for the filter presses will be returned to the process or delivered
to the existing tailings facility. The filtered-stacked tailings storage facility will provide additional tailings
storage capacity to the conventional tailings facility. Pending permit approval, the filtered tailings facility is
planned to be constructed in 2023.
18 PROJECT INFRASTRUCTURE
The Huaron mine is an underground silver-copper-lead-zinc mine located in the province of Pasco in the
Central Highlands of Peru. Pan American is the 100% owner of Huaron and the mining concessions, through
its wholly-owned subsidiary, Pan American Silver Huaron S.A.
The mine infrastructure comprises the underground mine workings, processing facilities, existing tailing
impoundments, effluent management and treatment systems, waste rock storage facilities and maintenance
shops and warehouses laboratories, storage facilities, offices, drill core and logging sheds, water and power
lines, access roads, and the worker’s camp and recreational facilities. The primary source of power for the
mine is the Peruvian national power grid and is sufficient for the mine’s current requirements. The power
consumption is approximately 66 million kilowatt hours per year.
The operating mine is mature and site infrastructure including site roads are fully developed to support the
existing mine production of one Mtpa.
Source: PAS.
The nearest city is Cerro de Pasco, a major historical mining center with a population of approximately
70,000 people, which is connected to Lima 320 km to the southwest by road and rail. The nearby town of
Huayllay also provides workers, lodging, and supplies. Experienced mining personnel from the region
commute to the Property via company sponsored buses, company vehicles, or privately owned vehicles.
Materials, fuel, and produced metal concentrates are transported to their destinations by road.
Concentrates may also be transported by rail.
Other major processing facilities include a stockpile area near the processing plant and a tailings facility for
the storage of flotation tails. Minor processing facilities include a small building with an analytical lab and
metallurgical lab, another building for general administrative offices, a milk of lime preparation plant, a
water reservoir for domestic use, a water reservoir for industrial use, and two sewage water treatment
plants.
Huaron has a contract in place with Robocon Shotcrete Services of Lima, Peru, for the preparation,
transport, and application of wet mix shotcrete. The haulage of plant feed for processing up the mine ramp
to surface stockpiles is under a contract with Dinet Logistica Inteligente of Lima, Peru. A contract is also in
place with TUMI Contratistas Mineros S.A.C. of Lima, Peru, for raise boring.
In the opinion of the QP, the contracts in place conform to industry norms.
Martin Wafforn, P.Eng., Senior Vice President, Technical Service and Process Optimization of Pan American
and the QP responsible for this section of the technical report, has reviewed the contract terms, rates, and
charges for the production and sale of the silver, zinc, lead, and copper produced at Huaron, and considers
them sufficient to support the assumptions made in this Technical Report.
Huaron participates in the Mining Association of Canada’s “Towards Sustainable Mining” program and has
achieved Level A on environmental protocols.
The fine fraction of the process tailings is delivered to a tailing impoundment area via a pipeline. The tailing
impoundment area is constructed of quarried rock fill and waste rock from the mine. The facility is
continually reviewed and expanded as required and engineered and constructed to ensure geotechnical
stability by Pan American’s Engineer of Record, Anddes Associates. Monitoring instrumentation is in place to
confirm that the performance of the facility is within design limits. In 2020 and 2021 the tailings facility was
expanded to accommodate production until 2025. Further tailings facility raises will be required throughout
the LOM.
In August of 2006, Pan American submitted a comprehensive closure plan for Huaron to the MEM in
accordance with that ministry’s regulations. The closure plan was prepared by third-party consultants
registered with the Peruvian authorities as qualified to present closure plans to the MEM. The closure plan
includes a summary of the proposed closure scheme for each of the major areas of impact such as mine
water, tailings areas, waste rock dumps, plant site infrastructure, and the underground mine. A detailed cost
estimate was prepared based on Pan American’s and the consultant’s shared experience with closure works
and experience with other projects in Peru. As required by the MEM, the costs were summarized in three
phases: concurrent closure, final closure, and post closure. Updated closure plans are filed as required, with
the most recent closure plan modification approved in 2019.
A closure cost estimate for Huaron was prepared according to State of Nevada approved Standard
Reclamation Cost Estimator methodology in 2011 and is updated every year. The current undiscounted
value of closure expenditures at Huaron is estimated at $17.6 million.
The long-term assumptions for operating costs are shown in Table 21.1. The assumptions are justified on the
basis of the current actual operating costs at the mine, and on the basis of an annual throughput of one
Mtpa. As there are a number of fixed costs associated with operating a large underground mine such as
Huaron, an increase in the annual throughput could reasonably be expected to increase the total costs but
to reduce unit operating costs, and similarly a reduction in throughput could reasonably be expected to
decrease the total costs and to increase the unit operating costs.
Table 21.1 Annual operating costs
Estimated unit costs
Area
(US$ per tonne)
Mining 32.46
Processing 5.78
Maintenance 12.20
Electrical power and distribution 7.93
Safety, environment, and water treatment 3.84
Engineering and geology 3.20
Camp administration 11.48
Sub total production costs 76.89
Administration, insurance, legal, concessions 3.25
Management costs allocated 7.16
Shipping, selling, ocean freight 3.89
Total operating costs 91.19
22 ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
An economic analysis has been excluded from this Technical Report as Huaron mine is currently in
production and this Technical Report does not include a material expansion of current production.
23 ADJACENT PROPERTIES
There is no relevant information on adjacent properties to report.
Pan American conducts infill and near-mine drilling through much of the year and updates Mineral Resource
and Mineral Reserve estimates on an annual basis following reviews of metal price trends, operational
performance and costs experienced in the previous year, and forecasts of production and costs over the
LOM.
There are no known environmental, permitting, legal, title, taxation, socio-economic, marketing, political, or
other factors or risks that could materially affect the development of the Mineral Resources other than
noting that delays in the permitting process for the tailings dam filtration plant expansion could impact the
availability of tailings storage. Mineral Reserve estimates are based on assumptions that included mining,
metallurgical, infrastructure, permitting, taxation, and economic parameters. Increasing costs and taxation
and lower metal prices will have a negative impact on the quantity of Mineral Reserve estimates. Other than
normal course changes in metal prices, which fluctuate from time to time, there are no other known factors
that may have a material impact on the Mineral Reserve estimates at Huaron.
Since 2014, the Huaron mine has been processing between 900,000 to 1,000,000 tonnes of ore annually,
producing copper, lead, and zinc concentrates containing approximately 3.7 Moz of silver, 6,000 tonnes of
copper, 8,500 tonnes of lead, and 18,000 tonnes of zinc. Pan American expects to process approximately
one Mtpa in 2022. Engineering design for filtered-stacked tailings is currently underway to complement the
existing conventional tailings facility.
Huaron is a producing mine. No expansions or specific economic analyses are currently underway.
26 RECOMMENDATIONS
The authors of this report have no further recommendations to make at this time.
27 REFERENCES
Author Title
Long, S.D., Parker, H.M., and Assay quality assurance-quality control programme for drilling projects at the
Françis-Bongarçon, D. 1997. pre-feasibility to feasibility report level, prepared by Mineral Resources
Development Inc. (MRDI), August 1997.
28 QP CERTIFICATES
CERTIFICATE of QUALIFIED PERSON
I, Martin Wafforn, Senior Vice President, Technical Services and Process Optimization of Pan American Silver
Corp., 1500-625 Howe St, Vancouver, BC, V6C 2T6, Canada do hereby certify that:
1. I am the co-author of the technical report titled “Technical Report for the Huaron Property, Pasco,
Peru”, with an effective date of October 30, 2022 (the “Technical Report”).
2. I graduated with a Bachelor of Science in Mining degree from the Camborne School of Mines in
Cornwall, England in 1980. I am a Professional Engineer in good standing with The Association of
Professional Engineers and Geoscientists of the Province of British Columbia. I am also a Chartered
Engineer in good standing in the United Kingdom. My experience is primarily in the areas of mining
engineering and I have worked as an engineer in the mining industry for a total of 40 years since my
graduation from the Camborne School of Mines.
3. I have read the definition of ‘qualified person’ set out in National Instrument 43-101 (the
“Instrument”) and certify that by reason of my education, affiliation with a professional association
and past relevant work experience, I fulfil the requirements of a ‘qualified person’ for the purposes of
the Instrument.
4. I have visited the Property on October 27, 2021.
5. I am responsible for Sections 2 - 5, 15, 16, 19 - 22, 24 - 26 and 1.1, 1.7, 1.8, 1.11, 1.12, 12.2 of the
Technical Report.
6. I am currently employed as the Senior Vice President, Technical Services and Process Optimization for
Pan American Silver Corp., the owner of the Property, and by reason of my employment, I am not
considered independent of the issuer as described in Section 1.5 of the Instrument.
7. I have had prior involvement with the Property that is the subject of the Technical Report; I am an
employee of Pan American Silver Corp. and have conducted site visits to the Property, including as
described in Section 2 – Introduction of the Technical Report, and most recently from October 27,
2021.
8. I have read the Instrument and Form 43-101F1, and the Technical Report has been prepared in
compliance with the Instrument and that form.
9. As of the effective date of the Technical Report, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief,
the Technical Report contains all the scientific and technical information that is required to be
disclosed to make the Technical Report not misleading.
1. I am the co-author of the technical report titled “Technical Report for the Huaron Property, Pasco,
Peru”, with an effective date of October 30, 2022 (the “Technical Report”).
2. I graduated with a Bachelor of Engineering in Industrial Geology from Camborne School of Mines,
Exeter University, England, in 1998 and earned my Master of Science in Mineral Exploration from
Leicester University in 2000. I am a Fellow of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy
(FAusIMM) and a Fellow of the Geological Society of London (FGS). I have worked as a geologist in
both mining and exploration for the past 17 years since my graduation from Leicester University.
3. I have read the definition of ‘Qualified Person’ set out in National Instrument 43-101 (the
“Instrument”) and certify that by reason of my education, affiliation with a professional association,
and past relevant work experience, I fulfil the requirements of a ‘Qualified Person’ for the purposes of
the Instrument.
4. I have visited the Property on October 27, 2021.
5. I am responsible for Sections 6 - 11, 14, 23, 27 and 1.2, 1.3, 1.4, 1.6, 12.1 of the Technical Report.
6. I am currently employed as the Vice President, Business Development and Geology for Pan American
Silver Corp., the owner of the Property, and by reason of my employment, I am not considered
independent of the issuer as described in Section 1.5 of the Instrument.
7. I have had prior involvement with the Property that is the subject of the Technical Report; I am an
employee of Pan American Silver Corp. and have conducted site visits to the Property, including as
described in Section 2 – Introduction of the Technical Report, and most recently on October 27, 2021.
8. I have read the Instrument and Form 43-101F1, and the Technical Report has been prepared in
compliance with the Instrument and that form.
9. As of the effective date of the Technical Report, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief,
the Technical Report contains all the scientific and technical information that is required to be
disclosed to make the Technical Report not misleading.
1. I am the co-author of the technical report titled “Technical Report for the Huaron Property, Pasco,
Peru”, with an effective date of October 30, 2022 (the “Technical Report”).
2. I graduated with a Master of Science in Metallurgical and Material Engineering from the Colorado
School of Mines in Golden, Colorado, in 2007, and with a Bachelor of Science in Metallurgical
Engineering degree from the Universidad Nacional de Ingenieria, Lima, Peru, in 2000. I am a
Professional Engineer in good standing with the Association of Professional Engineers and
Geoscientists of the Province of British Columbia. My experience is primarily in the areas of metallurgy
and mineral processing engineering and I have worked as a metallurgist in the mining industry for a
total of 21 years since my graduation from the Universidad Nacional de Ingenieria.
3. I have read the definition of ‘qualified person’ set out in National Instrument 43-101 (the
“Instrument”) and certify that by reason of my education, affiliation with a professional association
and past relevant work experience, I fulfil the requirements of a ‘qualified person’ for the purposes of
the Instrument.
4. I have visited the Property on September 21 - 23, 2021.
5. I am responsible for Sections 13, 17, 18, and 1.5, 1.9, 1.10, 12.3 of the Technical Report.
6. I am currently employed as the Vice President, Mineral Processing, Tailings and Dams for Pan
American Silver Corp., the owner of the Property, and by reason of my employment, I am not
considered independent of the issuer as describe in Section 1.5 of the Instrument.
7. I have had prior involvement with the Property that is the subject of the Technical Report; I am an
employee of Pan American Silver Corp. and have conducted site visits to the Property, including as
described in Section 2 – Introduction of the Technical Report, and most recently from September 21 -
23, 2021.
8. I have read the Instrument and Form 43-101F1, and the Technical Report has been prepared in
compliance with the Instrument and that form.
9. As of the effective date of the Technical Report, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief,
the Technical Report contains all the scientific and technical information that is required to be
disclosed to make the Technical Report not misleading.