Contempt of Court
Contempt of Court
Contempt of court is the offence of being defiant or disrespectful to the court of law. Being impolite to
legal authorities in the courtroom, or rebelliously failing to follow a court order may draw Contempt of
Court proceedings. A judge can levy sanctions such as a penalty or prison for someone found guilty of
contempt of court.
This was in news regarding comments made on social media against the CJI by Prashant Bhushan for
which he faced criminal contempt of court. There are different aspects to this debate over contempt of
court. While several countries have termed such laws as obsolete and archaic, the large number of
contempt cases in Indian courts and the need to insulate and safeguard the judiciary are the reasons in
favour of contempt laws.
In the age of social media, the balance between freedom of speech and anything that ‘scandalises’ the
court has to be revisited. The Supreme Court and the High Courts derive their power from the
constitution of India while the procedure is outlined in the Contempt of Court, Act, 1971.
The Law Commission has recommended that it should be restricted only to civil contempt.
When a court decides that an action constitutes contempt of court, it can issue an order that in the
context of a court trial or hearing declares a person or organization to have disobeyed or been
disrespectful of the court’s authority, called “found” or “held” in contempt. That is the judge’s strongest
power to impose sanctions for acts that disrupt the court’s normal process.
Contempt proceedings are especially used to enforce equitable remedies, such as injunctions. In some
jurisdictions, the refusal to respond to subpoena, to testify, to fulfil the obligations of a juror, or to
provide certain information can constitute contempt of the court.