Management 11th Edition Griffin Solutions Manual Download
Management 11th Edition Griffin Solutions Manual Download
SOLUTIONS MANUAL
Full download at link:
CHAPTER 8
Managing Strategy and Strategic Planning
CHAPTER SUMMARY
This chapter discusses how organizations manage strategy and strategic planning. It begins by examining
the nature of strategic management including its components and alternatives. It then describes the kinds
of analyses needed for firms to formulate their strategies. Next it examines how organizations first
formulate and then implement business strategies, followed by a parallel discussion at the corporate
strategy level. The chapter concludes with a discussion of international and global strategies.
LEARNING OBJECTIVES
After covering this chapter, students should be able to:
1. Discuss the components of strategy, types of strategic alternatives, and the distinction between
strategy formulation and strategy implementation.
2. Describe how to use SWOT (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats) analysis in
formulating strategy.
3. Identify and describe various alternative approaches to business-level strategy formulation.
4. Describe how business-level strategies are implemented.
5. Identify and describe various alternative approaches to corporate-level strategy formulation.
6. Describe how corporate-level strategies are implemented.
83 © 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Chapter 8: Managing Strategy and Strategic Planning
84 © 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Chapter 8: Managing Strategy and Strategic Planning
LECTURE OUTLINE
I. THE NATURE OF STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT
A strategy is a comprehensive plan for accomplishing a firm’s goals.
Strategic management is a comprehensive and ongoing process aimed at formulating and
implementing effective strategies.
Effective strategies are those that promote a superior alignment between the firm and its
environment and the achievement of strategic goals.
A. The Components of Strategy
1. A distinctive competence is something a firm does exceptionally well.
Management Update: For decades, Volvo has been associated with cars that are exceptionally safe.
Other car makers seem unable or unwilling to compete with Volvo in those areas.
Teaching Tip: Emphasize for students that a distinctive competence always exists in a limited area and
does not imply competencies in other areas. For example, Volvos are not known for their sporty
performance or their trend-setting appearance. In another example, Wal-Mart has a distinctive
competence in keeping prices low, but it is not especially good at offering high-quality products or
exceptional service.
2. Scope specifies the range of markets in which a firm will compete.
Global Connection: For an international business, the scope component of strategy specifies in which
foreign markets the firm intends to compete.
3. Resource deployment specifies how a firm will distribute its resources across the areas in
which it competes.
Global Connection: For an international business, the resource deployment component of strategy
helps determine the relative concentration of firm resources and efforts in various markets.
B. Types of Strategic Alternatives
1. Business-level strategy consists of the set of strategic alternatives that a firm chooses
from as it conducts business in a particular industry or market.
2. Corporate-level strategy consists of the set of strategic alternatives that a firm chooses
from as it manages its operations simultaneously across several industries and several
markets.
Teaching Tip: Strongly reinforce the point here distinguishing between business- and corporate-level
strategies.
Extra Example: A good example that helps distinguish between business- and corporate-level
strategies is PepsiCo. Among other things, PepsiCo owns Pepsi soft drinks and Frito-Lay (Doritos,
Ruffles, etc.). Determining which businesses PepsiCo will own is part of its corporate-level strategy;
deciding how each separate business will compete is part of its business-level strategy.
Teaching Tip: An additional level of strategy is functional level. This refers to strategies developed for
specific functional areas such as marketing, finance, and so forth.
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part. 85
Chapter 8: Managing Strategy and Strategic Planning
86 © 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Chapter 8: Managing Strategy and Strategic Planning
Extra Example: During World War II, Coca-Cola’s CEO decreed that every U.S. soldier abroad
should have access to a 5-cent bottle of Coke. With government assistance, the firm built 64 overseas
bottling plants. This early entry into global markets gave Coke an advantage over Pepsi that it has never
relinquished.
B. Evaluating an Organization’s Weaknesses
Organizational weaknesses—skills and capabilities that do not enable a firm to choose and
implement strategies that support its mission
A firm has a competitive disadvantage when it is not implementing valuable strategies that are
being implemented by competing firms.
C. Evaluating an Organization’s Opportunities and Threats
1. Organizational opportunities—areas that may generate higher performance
2. Organizational threats—areas that make it difficult for a firm to perform at a high level
Discussion Starter: Ask students if they think it is easier to assess environment opportunities and
threats or organizational strengths and weaknesses. While the latter are more “immediate,” such
analysis may also pose threats to individuals within the organization.
Cross-Reference: Porter’s five forces model of the competitive environment discussed in Chapter 3
can be used to characterize the extent of opportunity and threat in an organization’s environment.
Porter’s five forces are the level of rivalry, power of suppliers, power of customers, threat of
substitutes, and threat of new entrants.
Group Exercise: Have small groups of students outline a hypothetical SWOT analysis of a local firm
and/or your college or university.
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part. 87
Chapter 8: Managing Strategy and Strategic Planning
Global Connection: Some firms extend product life cycles by introducing them into less-developed
foreign markets. For example, a line of home appliances that is entering the decline stage in Japan,
Europe, or the United States might be seen as advanced technology in less developed regions.
88 © 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Chapter 8: Managing Strategy and Strategic Planning
Group Exercise: Have groups of students identify differences and similarities between Porter’s generic
strategies and Miles and Snow’s strategies.
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part. 89
Chapter 8: Managing Strategy and Strategic Planning
Extra Example: Ford’s purchase of Jaguar a few years ago (it is now owned by Tata Motors) was an
example of related diversification.
2. Advantages of related diversification
a) Reduces a firm’s dependence on any one of its business activities and thus reduces
economic risk.
b) Reduces the overhead costs associated with managing any one business.
c) Allows a firm to exploit its strengths and capabilities in more than one business
(creates synergies).
d) Synergy exists among a set of businesses when the businesses’ economic value
together is greater than their economic value separately.
Extra Example: A recent trend in organizations today is a reduction in the number of businesses, to
create an organization that consists of SBUs that are highly related. Examples include Vivendi’s
divestiture of publishing and water utilities in order to focus on electronic media. In another example,
Georgia Pacific sold its timber units and refocused on building and paper products.
Extra Example: However, when Georgia Pacific considered separating its paper products division
from its building products division and creating two companies, investors failed to support the firm,
showing that the separation was not seen as creating synergy.
90 © 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Chapter 8: Managing Strategy and Strategic Planning
C. Unrelated Diversification
Unrelated diversification—operating multiple businesses that are not related to one another
1. Presumed benefits: businesses that use this strategy should have stable performance over
time and resource allocation advantages.
2. Actual disadvantages: Corporate-level managers may not know enough about the
unrelated businesses to provide helpful strategic guidance or to allocate capital
appropriately. Also, because firms that implement unrelated diversification fail to exploit
important synergies, they are at a competitive disadvantage compared to firms that use
related diversification.
Extra Example: General Electric is perhaps the most successful firm today that still uses unrelated
diversification. GE owns businesses in such disparate industries as aircraft engines, appliances, finance
and insurance, and plastics.
Extra Example: Seagram’s, a large liquor company, once bought MCA, an entertainment business,
from Matsushita Electric. This represents a case of unrelated diversification.
Extra Example: Many petroleum firms have implemented both backward and forward vertical
integration—they extract petroleum, refine it, distribute it, and retail it.
3. Mergers and acquisitions—when two firms are combined
Management Update: With the decline in the stock market that began in 2001, mergers and
acquisitions are no longer as popular as they were in the 1990s. Companies that merge today are
finding it hard to obtain financing for the giant deals.
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part. 91
Chapter 8: Managing Strategy and Strategic Planning
a) Merger—occurs when the two organizations being combined are approximately the
same size and a new firm is created.
Extra Example: Daimler-Benz and Chrysler merged in 1998, creating the world’s third-largest
automobile company. Citibank and Traveler’s Insurance merged, creating Citigroup, the largest
financial services firm in the U.S. More recent mega-mergers include the Newell-Rubbermaid and
the Kmart-Sears mergers
b) Acquisition—occurs when one of the firms buys the other outright.
Extra Example: The Limited has also grown by acquisition. It purchased Lane Bryant (clothes for
larger women) and later sold it. It also purchased Victoria’s Secret intimates stores and Abercrombie
and Fitch, a popular brand of clothing geared toward young adults.
B. Managing Diversification
Portfolio management techniques—methods that diversified firms use to make decisions about
what businesses to engage in and how to manage these multiple businesses.
1. BCG matrix—provides a framework for evaluating the relative performance of
businesses in which a diversified organization operates.
The matrix uses two factors to evaluate a firm’s set of businesses: market growth rate and
market share. The matrix classifies the types of businesses that a diversified firm can
engage in.
a) Dogs are businesses that have a very small share of a market that is not expected to
grow.
b) Cash cows are businesses that have a large share of a market that is not expected to
grow substantially.
c) Question marks are businesses that have only a small share of a quickly growing
market.
d) Stars are businesses that have the largest share of a rapidly growing market.
Group Exercise: Have groups of students research and collect information about a large diversified
firm. (Disney, General Motors, Sears, or Procter and Gamble would all make good examples.) Then
have the groups classify the firm’s various businesses into the four cells of the BCG matrix.
Teaching Tip: Use Figure 8.3 as a framework for discussing the BCG matrix.
2. GE Business Screen
A more sophisticated approach than the BCG matrix, using a nine-cell matrix. Note that
using the GE Business Screen parallels the application of SWOT analysis.
Teaching Tip: General Electric developed the Business Screen as a refinement and extension of the
BCG matrix.
Group Exercise: If you had your students do the exercise discussed earlier (classifying a firm’s
businesses into BCG matrix cells), have them repeat the exercise (using the same information) for the
GE Business Screen.
92 © 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Chapter 8: Managing Strategy and Strategic Planning
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part. 93
Chapter 8: Managing Strategy and Strategic Planning
94 © 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Chapter 8: Managing Strategy and Strategic Planning
business, and in those firms, the business-level strategy will be developed first. However, for a
diversified firm, corporate and business strategies are formulated and implemented simultaneously.
7. Volkswagen sold its original Beetle automobile in the United States until the 1970s. The original
Beetle was made of inexpensive materials, was built using an efficient mass production technology,
and offered few options. Then, in the 1990s, Volkswagen introduced its new Beetle, which has a
distinctive style, provides more optional features, and is priced for upscale buyers. What was
Volkswagen’s strategy with the original Beetle—product differentiation, low cost, or focus? Which
strategy did Volkswagen implement with its new Beetle? Explain your answers.
The original Beetle was clearly part of a low cost strategy with its emphasis on efficiency, inexpensive
components, lack of distinguishing features, and low price. The new Beetle signals a switch to a
differentiation strategy because of its style, customization, up-scale target market, and higher price.
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part. 95
Chapter 8: Managing Strategy and Strategic Planning
96 © 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Chapter 8: Managing Strategy and Strategic Planning
The main message of this game is: “It’s nice to be nice, to the nice.” Students will find that
competition is the preferred mode when rivals are behaving competitively, and cooperation is
preferred in situations where rivals are willing to be cooperative. In a mixed case, faced with some
rivals that are cooperative and some that are competitive, the cooperative firms can band together
and effectively compete against the competitive firms by using their combined power.
You will need at least one board game of Trouble, by Milton Bradley, or a generic equivalent of that
game. In the game, four players move pieces around a board in an attempt to complete the course
first. When players land on an occupied space, they send their opponent’s piece back to the start.
It’s best to have one game for each four students. If you cannot do that, it’s best to have at least four
games so that students can watch each strategy being played out. However, it’s possible to play the
game with just one set if volunteers come forward to play the game in front of the entire class.
There are four different rule sets, which can be played simultaneously, and then the results reported
to the class. Alternatively, the rule sets can be played sequentially.
For all rules sets: Four players per game. Each player uses only 2 pieces, not 4 (in order to make the
game play faster). Players start moving pieces on their first roll of the dice, rather than waiting for a
specific number (again, for speed).
Rule Set 1: This is the cooperative game. Players should try not to land on an occupied space, and
they may never send any of their opponent’s pieces back to the start. If they must land on an
occupied space, the player should put their piece in the next free spot, not displacing his or her
opponent.
Rule Set 2: This is the competitive game. Players must land on occupied spaces if possible, and they
must always send their opponent’s piece back to the start when they do.
Rule Set 3: This is the mixed case, “wolf among the sheep” game. One player is chosen at the start
to be the competitive one, and the group is informed. During play, the competitive player plays by
Rule Set 2, sending his or her opponent’s pieces back to the start whenever possible. The three
cooperative players play by Rule Set 1. That is, they may never send opponent’s pieces back to the
start.
Rule Set 4: This is the mixed case, “retaliation” game. One player is chosen at the start to be the
competitive one, and the group is informed. During play, the competitive player plays by Rule Set 2,
sending his or her opponent’s pieces back to the start whenever possible. The three cooperative
players play by Rule Set 1, when they are facing another cooperative player. That is, they should not
send a cooperative player’s pieces back to the start. However, the three cooperative players play by
Rule Set 2, when they are facing the competitive player. That is, they should try to send the
competitive player’s pieces back to the start whenever possible.
Students will find that the cooperative game (#1) goes quickly and smoothly. All players do about
equally well, except for the random nature of the dice roll. Students sometimes say this game is
“boring.” However, remind them that boring is undesirable in a board game, but might be very
desirable in industries where “excitement” might mean loss of jobs or bankruptcy.
Students will find that the competitive game (#2) takes the longest, as players must constantly start
over. All players do about equally poorly. This game may be more fun than Game 1, but again,
remind students that in real life, intense competition can be damaging and expensive.
Students will find that the wolf-among-the-sheep game (#3) seems very unfair, as the competitive
student has a strong advantage. Explain to students that this is the case that prevails when some
competitors compete strongly and others do not. It’s also analogous to situations such as one student
cheating on an exam while all the others are honest.
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part. 97
Chapter 8: Managing Strategy and Strategic Planning
Students will find that retaliation game (#4) seems to be fair, because the competitive student often
does not win. This is the situation in which some rivals cooperate for mutual benefit with other
trusted rivals, while competitive rivals find that the others “gang up” and use their combined power
to squash any competitive tactics. This is analogous to the situation where the honest students study
together to help each other, excluding the cheating student from the study group.
A. Break into small groups and play the board game according to the instructions you receive
from your professor.
B. Present your group’s results to the class.
C. Analyze the results reported by every group and be prepared to share your thoughts about the
outcomes.
Although there is a random element in this game, results are likely to be as reported above.
Explain the outcomes, and then ask the students, “What do you learn about business
competition and cooperation from this game?” Another good approach is to ask students to
name business situations in which this type of thinking about cooperation and competition
could be useful. Students will be able to think of examples such as in managing their careers
and relationships at work, industry competition, and so on.
MANAGEMENT AT WORK
98 © 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Chapter 8: Managing Strategy and Strategic Planning
3. Case Question 3: How would you use Miles and Snow typology theory to advise Activision
Blizzard on the best way to maintain its leadership in the videogame market?
Activision Blizzard is likely to be the “new” prospector in the industry, having usurped this position
from Electronic Arts. Electronic Arts has likely become the reactor. Activision Blizzard has to
consolidate its prospector position by continuously launching new products and create the
perception of being on the cutting edge.
4. Case Question 4: If you ran a small video game startup, what would be your strategy for competing
with EA and Activision Blizzard?
Using Porter’s generic strategy theory, the best bet for a start up would be as a niche player, since
competing as a broad-based player such as EA and Activision would require a lot of resources and
could also be risky. As a niche player, the startup should focus either on a demographic category or
a category of games.
5. Case Question 5: If you’re a videogame player, what aspects of Activision’s strategy have led to
your playing more (or fewer) of its games? If you’re not a videogame player, what aspects of
Activision Blizzard’s strategy might induce you to try a few of its games?
While responses will vary, this question is very likely to foster a high amount of discussion as
students can be expected to debate the relative merits of various video games.
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part. 99