Scribd
Upload
50 views1 page

PRISMA Abstracts Checklist

This document presents a 12-item checklist for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy studies based on the PRISMA-DTA statement. The checklist includes items on reporting the title and objectives, eligibility criteria, information sources, risk of bias assessment, data synthesis methods, included study characteristics, synthesis of results, strengths and limitations of evidence, interpretation of results, funding sources, and registration.

Uploaded by

Dayanna Lizeth Quiñones Delgado
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
50 views1 page

PRISMA Abstracts Checklist

This document presents a 12-item checklist for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy studies based on the PRISMA-DTA statement. The checklist includes items on reporting the title and objectives, eligibility criteria, information sources, risk of bias assessment, data synthesis methods, included study characteristics, synthesis of results, strengths and limitations of evidence, interpretation of results, funding sources, and registration.

Uploaded by

Dayanna Lizeth Quiñones Delgado
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

PRISMA-DTA for Abstracts Checklist

Reported
Section/topic # PRISMA-DTA for Abstracts Checklist item
on page #
TITLE and PURPOSE
Title 1 Identify the report as a systematic review (+/- meta-analysis) of diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) studies.
Objectives 2 Indicate the research question, including components such as participants, index test, and target conditions.

METHODS
Eligibility criteria 3 Include study characteristics used as criteria for eligibility.
Information sources 4 List the key databases searched and the search dates.
Risk of bias & applicability 5 Indicate the methods of assessing risk of bias and applicability.

Synthesis of results A1 Indicate the methods for the data synthesis.

RESULTS
Included studies 6 Indicate the number and type of included studies and the participants and relevant characteristics of the studies
(including the reference standard).
Synthesis of results 7 Include the results for the analysis of diagnostic accuracy, preferably indicating the number of studies and participants.
Describe test accuracy including variability; if meta-analysis was done, include summary results and confidence
intervals.
DISCUSSION
Strengths and limitations 9 Provide a brief summary of the strengths and limitations of the evidence
Interpretation 10 Provide a general interpretation of the results and the important implications.

OTHER
Funding 11 Indicate the primary source of funding for the review.
Registration 12 Provide the registration number and the registry name

Adapted From: McInnes MDF, Moher D, Thombs BD, McGrath TA, Bossuyt PM, The PRISMA-DTA Group (2018). Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test
Accuracy Studies: The PRISMA-DTA Statement. JAMA. 2018 Jan 23;319(4):388-396. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.19163.
For more information, visit: www.prisma-statement.org.
Page 1 of 1

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy