1. Karel Čapek was a noted Czech writer from the early 20th century known for introducing the word "robot" in his play R.U.R. and for his novels, plays, travel writing, and essays.
2. Čapek emerged as a dramatist and novelist in the 1920s-1930s, writing visionary plays and utopian novels that were critical of capitalism and the postwar situation.
3. Čapek's later works attacked dictatorship and the rise of Hitler, expressing his humanity and belief in ordinary people. He died in 1938 shortly after the Nazi occupation of Czechoslovakia.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
845 views5 pages
Havlena's Verdict
1. Karel Čapek was a noted Czech writer from the early 20th century known for introducing the word "robot" in his play R.U.R. and for his novels, plays, travel writing, and essays.
2. Čapek emerged as a dramatist and novelist in the 1920s-1930s, writing visionary plays and utopian novels that were critical of capitalism and the postwar situation.
3. Čapek's later works attacked dictatorship and the rise of Hitler, expressing his humanity and belief in ordinary people. He died in 1938 shortly after the Nazi occupation of Czechoslovakia.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 5
Mr.
HAVLENA’S VERDICT - Karel Capek
Karel Čapek introduced and made popular the frequently used
international word robot, which first appeared in his play R.U.R. in 1920. ... The word robota means literally "corvée", "serf labor", and figuratively "drudgery" or "hard work" in Czech. Theater play: Rossum's Universal Robots Born: 1890, Malé Svatoňovice Profession: Journalist, Writer Sibling: Josef Čapek, Helena Karel Čapek Čapek (1890-1938) was a noted novelist, playwright, and essayist. He was perhaps the best-known Czech literary figure of the 1920s and 1930s. Born in northeastern Bohemia on Jan. 9, 1890, Karel Čapek was the son of a physician. He studied philosophy at the Czech University of Prague, where he was influenced in his thinking by Henri Bergson and by modern American philosophy. In 1914 he earned a doctorate. He remained, except for numerous travels abroad, in Prague until the end of his life. In 1935 he married the well-known actress Olga Scheinpflugóva. Literary Works The Czech author Karel Čapek's first creative phase (1908- 1921) was marked by close collaboration with his brother, Joseph, who later became a distinguished painter. This period in his writing career culminated in two collections of short stories. The central motif of Wayside Crosses (1917) is the mechanism of modern civilization—"Everything that we touch becomes a tool. Even man." The second collection, Painful Stories (1921; Eng. trans. Money and Other Stories), deals with middle-class life. It is no accident that the decisive role in almost all the stories is played by money. The characters in these books are, for the most part, helpless victims of forces that have overwhelmed them. ngd In his second phase (1921-1932) Čapek emerged as a dramatist, novelist, journalist, and writer of travel sketches. Some of his comedies as well as his novels from this period are utopian. Best known, especially to American theatergoers, is his visionary play R. U. R. (1920), a sharp criticism of capitalism which introduced the word "robot" into the English language. Another comedy of this period, portraying the postwar situation in the world, is the ballet or revue From the Insect World (1921), written in collaboration with his brother and translated into English as The World We Live In. During this period Čapek also became prominent as an essayist. His deep humanity and his belief in ordinary man were expressed in an enjoyable book of humorous sketches, Gardener's Year (1922). Best known, however, and widely translated were his popular travel books on England, Italy, Spain, Holland, and Scandinavia. In the collection entitled Fairy Tales (1931), a veritable treasure- house of pure storytelling, Čapek revealed his sincere understanding of childhood, his sense of humor, and C the light touch characteristic of his fiction during the middle period. His third and final creative phase (1932-1938) was marked by his highest achievement: a philosophical trilogy of distinguished novels which first appeared in serial form in newspapers between 1932 and 1934. The novels— Hordubal, Meteor, and An Ordinary Life—center on the problems of truth and reality. Čapek tells the same story from three different points of view, and in this respect he is sometimes compared to such masters of perspective in modern fiction as Henry James and Joseph Conrad. Between 1934 and 1938 Čapek wrote a biography of Tomáš Masaryk, founder and first president of Czechoslovakia, told as far as possible in Masaryk's own words. The first two volumes of this popular work were translated into English as President Masaryk Tells His Story (1934) and Masaryk's Thought and Life (1938). Čapek proved to be a bitter foe of dictatorship, attacking it forcefully in his last works written for the stage: Power and Glory (1937; Eng. trans. The White Scourge) and his last play, The Mother, written under the impact of the Spanish Civil War and the threat of Hitler against Čapek's own country. A few weeks after the occupation of Czechoslovakia, Čapek died in Prague on Dec. 25, 1938. Further Reading Two monographs on Čapek are available in English: William Edward Harkins, Karel Čapek (1962), a critical study; and Alexander Matuška, Karel Čapek: An Essay (1964; trans. 1964), a biographical and critical survey. Mr. Havlena’s ‘Verdict is an interesting account of an imaginary criminal case which got wide publicity. The author highlights the general trend of reporting sensational criminal case in newspaper almost every day in order to attract the reading public. Police news reporters used to hatch out novel cases for themselves and could find a regular market for them. Mr. Havlena the person who supplied the case in the essay was a law student who discontinued his studies. Still he was well-versed in legal matters, especially criminal cases. He used to supply cases for police reporters. His cases were well received by the readers and he was paid in terms of cigar and beer. One day Havlena imagined a case. It was the case of an old bachelor who had a quarrel with a widow who lived opposite to him. So he got a parrot and trained it well so that wherever the lady appeared on her balcony it screeched out at the top of its voice “You slut” which means “dirty woman” The widow brought an action against him for defamation of character. The district courts sentenced him to fourteen days imprisonment. This case appeared in about six newspapers under various headlines such as “Far from the Madding Crowd “Landlord and Poor Widow” “Accusation against parrot” etc. The ministry of Justice decided to file an appeal against the order of the district court and asked for the particulars of the case from the newspaper. When this was taken to the knowledge of Havlena, he got angry, drew up a detailed statement to vindicate the Verdict and sent it to the Ministry of Justice. It was not taken notice of by Ministry and Havlena stopped giving judgments afterwards. However, Havlena was not prepared to take this disgrace lying down. Soon he was back in business. He got a parrot, trained it up and made it utter the words ‘You slut’ at the old woman living opposite to his house. Contrary to his expectation the woman was not offended by the words uttered by the parrot. Havlena tried his best to persuade her to bring an action against him and at last succeeded in his attempt. She brought an action for defamation of character. When the case came up for trial, Havlena gave a long speech admitting all the allegations against him. But the magistrate wanted to hear the parrot and adjourned the case. At the next hearing the parrot was brought to the court. The parrot uttered the words ‘you slut’ towards all persons irrespective of sex. Therefore, it became clear that the words were not intended to defame the woman. Havlena strongly argued, that it was his intention to defame her. However the court found no reason in it and acquitted Havlena. Havlena went out of the court in anger, saying that he would file an appeal in the High Court. The appeal was also dismissed and thereafter Havlena was found loitering about the street like a lost soul. - Karel Capek’s attempt to bring to light the tendency among the reading public to go after interesting police reports is commendable
Simon Parker - Stories in Scripture and Inscriptions - Comparative Studies On Narratives in Northwest Semitic Inscriptions and The Hebrew Bible-Oxford University Press, USA (1997) PDF
Subject: Political Science I Course: Ba LLB Semester I Lecturer: Ms. Deepika Gahatraj Module: Module I, Political Science: Nature and Scope and It'S Relation To Law Structure