Pca Ijiset V7 I7 13
Pca Ijiset V7 I7 13
Abstract
Manufacturing in the Pharmaceutical Industry presents its own set of unique challenges. These range from constantly
changing drugs and medicines, to machine standards, to the amount of a desired medication that is required to be produced.
The world of pharmaceutical manufacturing is constantly changing. To keep up, the industry has fully adopted production
line automation to keep up with the demand and to produce drugs and medicines that will adhere to the strictest of standards.
The equipment capable of performing such tasks have undergone years of research and development and are still being
changed to this day. All factors when manufacturing drugs must be taken into consideration. This includes everything from
batch size, to dose size, to environment in which the drug is manufactured, to the packing requirements of each medication
and much more. Because of the large number of requirements and standards set on the manufacture of drugs, the use of
Industry 4.0 and other advanced automation equipment and software have been developed specifically for the
pharmaceutical industry. These processes and technologies may be changing and being updated at a rapid pace, however
certain technologies and processes remain similar among multiple different products and companies alike. The recent
outbreak of the COVID-19 (Coronavirus) is an example as to how the pharmaceutical industry adapts and changes to new
challenges and it shows how the machinery, software's, and workforce must adapt to combat this outbreak.
Keywords: Pharmaceutical, Automation, Robotics, Industry Standards, New Technologies, COVID-19
1. Introduction
The Pharmaceutical industry is held to some of the strictest standards in terms of productivity, cleanliness, and safety.
There are multiple different processes and functions of those processes that must be controlled for the finished product to be
safe for the consumer to use. Automated processes require less human intervention and are therefore less prone to human
errors. Once the process is setup and the system are showing repeatable, reliable results, the system can run without any
human interference. This all looks very good on paper, however getting these processes setup and producing these
repeatable results takes a lot of time and in most cases require a large investment from the company implementing these
processes. There is also a large amount of assumed risk when a company sets up a new automated process, especially in
pharmaceutical industries. Batches of raw material handled by these processes may be worth millions of dollars and if the
machine or process malfunctions, breaks down, or creates a finished product that does not hold up to the rigorous standard
set by The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and related firms, the entire batch, and millions of dollars, are wasted. The
key for pharmaceutical companies is to have reliable, sound automation systems that produce reliable results with a minimal
capital investment. Which will be the subject matter of this research paper. In addition, Remdesivir is an example of a
treatment that has been shown to be effective in combating the COVID-19 outbreak and also shows how the pharmaceutical
industry must be able to produce a large amount of a treatment that is effective, safe, and adheres to the standards that the
industry must adhere to.
120
IJISET - International Journal of Innovative Science, Engineering & Technology, Vol. 7 Issue 7, July 2020
ISSN (Online) 2348 – 7968 | Impact Factor (2020) – 6.72
www.ijiset.com
The American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) hold specific sets of standards the pharmaceutical industry must
abide by. These standards cover every facet of machinery used in pharmaceutical manufacturing, covering process control,
design, and performance, as well as quality acceptance and assurance testing [2]. The current list of categories the ASTM
established for the pharmaceutical industry consists of general biopharmaceutical standards, general pharmaceutical
standards, process understanding and Process Analytical Technology (PAT) system management implementation and
practice, and terminology [2]. In the general biopharmaceutical standards section, topics such as low temperature and
cryopreserved materials storage design, inventory control, and standard practices when handling biological materials are
covered. In the general pharmaceutical standards section, pharmaceutical manufacturing systems and equipment standards,
standard practice in demonstrating compliance, cleaning standards, and the like can be found. In the process understanding
and PAT system management implementation and practice section, standards for practicing pharmaceutical process design,
risk assessment/control, application of continuous processes, and sampling guides can be found.
When it comes to major standards to adhere to, there are 5 ASTM standards that are considered “essential” [3]. These
standards are essential to all new products being developed and sold by the pharmaceutical industry. The first of these
essential standards is titled “Standard Guide for Specification, Design, and Verification of Pharmaceutical and
Biopharmaceutical Manufacturing Systems and Equipment (E2500)”. This Pharmaceutical manufacturing system mainly
deals with standards such as the design, installation, operation and its performance factors. Before the publication of this
guide, it was harder for companies to adhere to this standard, the guide makes this process simpler to follow. This guide
allows for easier adherence to the current standards as compared to what they were before they were published. The second
essential standard is “Standard practice for Qualification of Basket and Paddle Dissolution Apparatus (E2503)”. This
standard addresses the product’s ability to be dissolved in the stomach. A procedure is established to allow for the
manufacturer to prove that their results from a calibration test of the product to be reproducible. The third essential standard
is the “Standard Practice for Pharmaceutical Process Design Utilizing Process Analytical Technology (E2474)”. This
standard helps streamline the manufacture of large quantities of pharmaceuticals and focuses on risk management,
continuous improvement, performance assessment, manufacturing strategy, data collection, and much more. The fourth
essential standard is “Standard Guide for Application of Continuous Process Verification to Pharmaceutical and
Biopharmaceutical Manufacturing (E2537)”. To create a product that ensures that the process will produce consistent results
based on the predetermined critical attributes of the product, the manufacturing process should focus on producing
consistent results. The fifth and final essential standard is “Standard Practice for Process for Inactivation of Rodent
Retrovirus by pH (E2888)”. This standard focuses on the medical efficacy of drugs. This involves the use of rodent-derived
cell cultures to ensure inactivation of non-defective C-type retroviruses [3]. It is from these standards that automation
processes for the pharmaceutical industry can be built. These standards are incredibly strict and must be adhered to
completely for a manufacturer to produce drugs and treatments.
121
IJISET - International Journal of Innovative Science, Engineering & Technology, Vol. 7 Issue 7, July 2020
ISSN (Online) 2348 – 7968 | Impact Factor (2020) – 6.72
www.ijiset.com
pharmaceutical manufacturers to update their operating systems with minimal downtime and require minimal amounts of
training [4]. PharmaSuite MES manages all the processes from recipe checks to quality checks and can bring a
manufacturing plant closer to “Industry 4.0”. Industry 4.0 refers to the latest revolution in industry that makes use of
interconnectivity, automation, machine learning, and real-time data. The Industry Internet of Things (IIoT) and smart
manufacturing connect physical production and operations with smart digital technology, machine learning, and big data to
allow monitoring and control of the entire supply chain and production system. Every company can benefit from this
concept, not only for connectedness but also access to real-time analytics across processes, partners, products, and people
[5]. Most software used in this industry are factory wide and usually bring said factories closer to being considered a part of
Industry 4.0 as the operator performs minimal operations on the machine and process itself [6].
Another company that provides software specifically for pharmaceutical automation industry is Master Control. This
company provides a software called Master Control Manufacturing Excellence. This software combines QMS and MES to
automate a factory floor and make a process or processes more efficient in terms of operations. This software provides
paper-less data entry and documentation and can cut production errors due to input and entry errors [7].
The future of pharmaceutical manufacturing will rely heavily on constant quality control and risk management in
conjunction with US FDA standards for DDS’s (Drug Delivery Systems) especially as new drug technologies become more
and more advanced. Systems managers and engineers alike will have to learn to “catch up” with the new drug technologies
to create DDS’s that adhere to FDA and ASTM standards, but are also low cost and can provide continuous manufacturing.
In order to be effective, Quality Risk Management (QRM) must be applied to the entire life cycle of a pharmaceutical
product. QRM can be defined as an integrated action aiming at first identifying, assessing, and prioritizing risks; and second,
at minimizing, monitoring, and controlling the related undesired result. From a manufacturing standpoint, QRM is most
effective when a team with adequate knowledge and background on the given product can analyze said product and the
processing required to make that product. Teams are usually multidisciplinary and have members that have experience in a
broad range of fields from dosage form design, to manufacturing, process engineering, and quality functions [8]. Risk
management, especially in the pharmaceutical field, is a continuous process that never truly ends. It is a constant process
that risk management teams must always update and re-evaluate their own processes and guidelines to ensure the product
they are producing is safe and effective.
Figure 1. Example of how most pharmaceutical industry processes can be automated (© F. Lagrange / CC-BY-SA-3.0)
122
IJISET - International Journal of Innovative Science, Engineering & Technology, Vol. 7 Issue 7, July 2020
ISSN (Online) 2348 – 7968 | Impact Factor (2020) – 6.72
www.ijiset.com
results. With all this in mind, machine vision technologies must be incredibly accurate and reliable to ensure the safety of
the consumer and of the supplier, as the industry is beginning to rely more and more on these technologies to replace human
interference now more than ever.
The pharmaceutical industry is known for their use of High Throughput Screening (HTS). This technology allows for
thousands of molecules of a drug to be scanned and tested This dramatically reduces laboratory testing and scanning time
versus scanning and testing one molecule at a time. This machine vision technology only scans the chemical entities of a
new drug and determines specific characteristics of the drug and these characteristics are compared to the desired results for
the drug . This replaces the human need to check for chemical identities once a new product is created. Critics of HTS say
that the process simply “attempts to find what sticks” or that the technology is a trial and error approach to finding what
works in a new drug. Chemists, pharmacologists, biologists, and related fields fear that this technology will take their jobs
away and diminish a part of the job that has been personally refined over many years. However, HTS technology simply
speeds up a laboratory’s ability to identify new chemical entities that have not been known before at a higher rate than the
current process. This specific technology can process chemical identities at a rate much higher than that of a human. This
technology allows for HTS systems and laboratory professionals to work side by side finding new chemical entities and
relationships that have not been known before at a rate several times faster than that of 20 years ago [11].
The industry also uses machine vision to perform quality control on filled glass serum vials. These systems can be broken
down into two parts. The first being calibration; this step consists of the software learning the shape of the bottle and the
overall dimensions of the bottle with the required solution inside. The second being the actual quality control; this consists
of ensuring the actual bottle is filled with the correct solution and that there is the correct amount of solution in the bottle
[12]. An important component of this process is edge detection. Texture analysis and motion detection are incredibly
important as these two functions determine whether or not the vision system will see the vial. These two processes are
difficult from a computing standpoint as texture analysis requires the camera system to be able to identify the material that is
in front of the camera. Motion detection requires a lot of memory storage sequences and real-time processing to allow the
software to determine whether there is a vial in front of the vision system [12] Digital photogrammetric methods are also
applied to the vision system to compute 3D information, in this case, two cameras are used instead of one. Digital
photogrammetric systems are especially useful when robotic arms are used, and the movements of the arms are determined
based on the orientation and placement of the vial [11].
The Pharmaceutical companies around the world are taking a hit from the spread of COVID-19. Countries are closing their
borders and limiting what’s entering their countries, which is negatively affecting the prices and supply chain of raw
materials and drugs. The issue arises more with generic drug types, unlike brand name drugs, as the probability of a drug
shortage is high during these times. As solutions are being determined to fix this drug shortage issue, the main priority is
trying to determine a possible vaccine for the Coronavirus. Additionally, since this virus is new and still in the unknown
phases, precautions have been implemented all around the world for the safety of the public.
Within the United States, the FDA has been the protector of human health for many years. They are taking unprecedented
action during these difficult times especially when it comes to expediting ways to test possible drugs in the hopes to combat
the negative effects of the coronavirus. This organization is taking precautions, but still allowing more laboratories and
manufacturers around the US to have a hand in the helping of finding a solution to this virus problem. For example, clinical
trials of possible vaccines are allowed to happen sooner than later as it’s their number one priority to solve this pandemic
and to get peoples’ lives back to normal. While COVID-19 is their focus, the FDA knows about the drug shortage in the
country and is actively reaching out to pharmaceutical manufactures to identify the drug shortages going around [13].
A clinical trial that shows promise in combating COVID-19 symptoms, whether severe or not, is a drug called Remdesivir.
Remdesivir is an investigational nucleotide analog with broad-spectrum antiviral activity [14]. This drug has been tested
first in animals to combat viruses similarly structured to COVID-19 such as MERS and SARS. Although this drug is not yet
approved for humans anywhere around the world, the US FDA just recently approved it for clinical trials in small quantities.
Some findings from the outcome of one clinical test, which was done between February 6 to March 12, 2020, showed some
promise.
123
IJISET - International Journal of Innovative Science, Engineering & Technology, Vol. 7 Issue 7, July 2020
ISSN (Online) 2348 – 7968 | Impact Factor (2020) – 6.72
www.ijiset.com
There were 237 people randomly selected for a Remdesivir test which all patients showcased coronavirus symptoms of
different magnitudes. Out of the 237, 158 people received the Remdesivir drug while the other 79 received a placebo.
Although not statistically significant, patients receiving remdesivir had a numerically faster time to clinical improvement
than those receiving placebo among patients with symptom duration of 10 days or less [15]. The effects of Remdesivir was
shown to mitigate the coronavirus systems of the patients receiving the drug to the point where some patients on respirators
didn’t require said device to assist with their breathing any longer. Even to the point of bringing them back from the brink of
death because of the complications from COVID-19 and to make a full recovery. However, adverse events were reported in
102 (66%) of 155 remdesivir recipients versus 50 (64%) of 78 placebo recipients [15]. Remdesivir was stopped early
because of adverse events in 18 (12%) patients versus four (5%) patients who stopped placebo early [15]. Although this
drug shows much promise in helping people with severe symptoms of the coronavirus, it’s still too early in the testing phase
to trust this drug fully. Even though some test patients are recovering from the virus because of the help of this drug, it is
still shown to have negative effects on some of the people being tested. Until this issue can be solved, more clinical trials
would have to be run, whether it be with this drug or not, in the hopes of finding a stable drug & cure for COVID-19.
The benefits of Remdesivir are still something for doctors to look into as other solutions could become available. For this
case, manufacturers would have to step up their production of this drug. Since Remdesivir is in liquid form, vials will have
to be created to contain the drug contents. Machines such as the RW-500 vial washer from SP Scientific would be beneficial
to use [16]. The speculation is that if machinists of this machine type can be taught how to operate it efficiently, the
possibility of making large batches of this drug help increase the probability of distributing it to doctors for further clinical
tests.
6. Conclusion
The Pharmaceutical Industry is held to some of the strictest standards compared to other industries. This in turn means that
the software, machines, and technologies produced must be held to these standards. The US FDA and ASTM are two
organizations that set the standards for the industry. Each organization has its own set of codes and standards that the
pharmaceutical industry must adhere to in terms of product creation, machinery, and manufacturing processes. The US FDA
focuses mainly on the creation and efficacy of new products, and the ASTM focuses mainly on the machinery, automation,
and manufacturing processes. Industry 4.0 is a term that is widely associated with the pharmaceutical industry. Machine
vision, advances in machine technology, and advances in automation software help bring the pharmaceutical industry closer
to adhering to this standard. The COVID-19 crisis has introduced an entirely new challenge to the pharmaceutical industry
as companies scramble in attempts to create a vaccine or a treatment for the virus. As it stands, the current treatment being
used is Remdesivir which is packaged in liquid form in vials for distribution. Because of the massive demand for the
treatment, pharmaceutical manufacturers have found that the scale of the manufacture and distribution of the treatment must
be multiplied in order to keep up with the demand. This will call for experts in the fields of automation, engineering,
product development, and quality control as these treatments will need to be effective and safe for the patient to use,
however, an incredibly large quantity of the treatment must also be produced. Overall, the pharmaceutical industry has
always been a large proponent of automation as it removes the element of potential human error and can create a clean,
reliable, effective drug.
References
[1] “Facts about the Current Good Manufacturing Practices (CGMPs),” U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 6/25/2018,
https://www.fda.gov/drugs/pharmaceutical-quality-resources/facts-about-current-good-manufacturing-practices-cgmps.
[2] “Pharmaceutical Application Standards,” ASTM International, 2020, https://www.astm.org/Standards/pharmaceutical-application-
standards.html.
[3] Sprinkle, Tim, “5 Essential Standards for Pharmaceutical Manufacturing,” ASTM International, 2019,
https://www.astm.org/standardization-news/?q=features/5-essential-standards-pharmaceutical-manufacturing-.html.
[4] “Pharmaceutical Manufacturing, Automation, Process Control, and Information Solutions for Pharma Industry,” Rockwell
Automation, 2020, https://www.rockwellautomation.com/en_NA/industries/life-sciences/overview.page?pagetitle=Pharmaceutical-
Manufacturing-Automation-and-Control-Systems&docid=d2c016ddc3f061298dd8fe36fa83b95d.
[5] “What Is Industry 4.0: The Industrial Internet of Things.” Epicor, 2020, www.epicor.com/en-us/resource-center/articles/what-is-
industry-4-0/.
124
IJISET - International Journal of Innovative Science, Engineering & Technology, Vol. 7 Issue 7, July 2020
ISSN (Online) 2348 – 7968 | Impact Factor (2020) – 6.72
www.ijiset.com
[6] Jonathan Wilkins, “The benefits of automation in pharmaceutical manufacturing,” The Engineer, Aug 22, 2017,
https://www.theengineer.co.uk/automating-pharmaceuticals/.
[7] “Pharmaceutical & Biotechnology Process Automation Software Systems,” MasterControl, 2020,
https://www.mastercontrol.com/eprocess-automation/pharma-biotech/
[8] Rantanen, Jukka; Khinast, Johannes, “The Future of Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Sciences,” Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences
Vol 104, Nov 2015, pp. 3612-3638, https://www.theengineer.co.uk/automating-pharmaceuticals/.
[9] Weber, Bradley, “Machine Vision Protects Pharmaceutical Packaging” Control Engineering Vol. 57, 2010, pp. 57-58.
[10] Spencer Paullin “The Basics of Machine Vision: Imagine your new Automation process in the modern age,” Omron Microscan
Systems , Aug 9,2017, Accessed 4/25/20, https://www.microscan.com/en-us/blog/solutions-applications/machine-vision-automation-
microhawk
[11] Styhre, Alexander, “Knowledge Management and the Vision Machine: Paul Virilio and the Technological Constitution of
Knowledge,” Knowledge and Process Management Vol. 13 (2006): p83-92
[12] V. Karathanassi, Chr. Iossididis. D. Rokos, “Application of machine vision techniques in the quality control of pharmaceutical
solutions,” Computers in Industry 32 (1996): p169-179
[13] “COVID-19: Impact on Global Pharmaceutical and Medical Product Supply Chain Constrains U.S. Production .” FTI Consulting,
2020, www.fticonsulting.com/~/media/Files/us-files/insights/articles/2020/mar/covid-19-impact-global-pharmaceutical-medical-
product- supply-chain.pdf.
[14]“About Remdesivir.” Gilead Creating Possible, 2020, www.gilead.com/purpose/advancing-global-health/covid-19/about-remdesivir.
[15] Wang, Yeming, et al. “Remdesivir in Adults with Severe COVID-19: a Randomised, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled,
Multicentre Trial.” The Lancet, 29 Apr. 2020, www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(20)31022-9/fulltext.
[16]“RW-500 Vial Washer from SP Scientific - An SP Industries Company,” American Pharmaceutical Review, 2020, accessed
5/11/2020, https://www.americanpharmaceuticalreview.com/25311-Pharmaceutical-Manufacturing-Equipment-Pharmaceutical-
Processing-Equipment/12089796-RW-500-Vial-Washer/?pda=25351|12089796_1_0|||
First Author Biographies should be limited to one paragraph consisting of the following: sequentially ordered list of degrees, including years achieved;
sequentially ordered places of employ concluding with current employment; association with any official journals or conferences; major professional
and/or academic achievements, i.e., best paper awards, research grants, etc.; any publication information (number of papers and titles of books
published); current research interests; association with any professional associations. Do not specify email address here.
Second Author biography appears here. Degrees achieved followed by current employment are listed, plus any major academic achievements. Do not
specify email address here.
Third Author is a member of the IEEE and the IEEE Computer Society. Do not specify email address here.
Dr. Ravindra Thamma, is currently a Professor of Robotics and Mechatronics at Central Connecticut State University. He serves as Department Chair of
Manufacturing and Construction Management at CCSU and as program coordinator of Robotics and Mechatronics. His teaching and research interests
are programmable controllers, robotics, linear control systems, and intelligent systems. He is a member of IEEE, ISA, ATMAE.
Dr. Daniel Kirby, is currently an Associate Professor of Manufacturing Management and Robotics and Mechatronics at CCSU. He serves as program
coordinator of Manufacturing Management. His teaching and research interests are manufacturing, automation, Industry 4.0, workforce development, and
process optimization. He is a member of ARM, ATMAE, and ISA.
Mr. Daniel Stachelek has graduated with Dean’s List honors from CCSU in May 2020 with a Bachelor of Science in Manufacturing Engineering
Technology. He has worked in industry during his studies, for Mechanical Rubber Products, Dur-A-Flex, EDAC Corporation, Glebar Company, and Atlas
Stamping and Manufacturing.
Mr. David Lunt David Lunt is a graduate of CCSU with a Bachelor of Science degree in Manufacturing Engineering Technology after attending CCSU
from 2015 to 2020. He also holds an Associates of Science degree in Engineering Technology: CAD Option earned at Tunxis Community College in
2016. He has been employed as a design engineer and now a quality inspector at Heise Industries Inc.
125