Chapter 2 Moral Dillema
Chapter 2 Moral Dillema
Devaras, RPm
Example:
What are Moral Dilemmas? a town mayor faces a
dilemma about how to
● A dilemma is a situation where a protect and preserve a
virgin forest and at the
person is forced to choose between
same time allow miners
two or more conflicting options, neither
and loggers for
of which is acceptable. economic development
in the town.
● It must be noted, however, that if a person is in a difficult situation
but is not forced to choose between two or more options, then
that person is not in a dilemma. The least that we can say is that that
person is just experiencing a problematic or distressful situation.
Thus, the most logical thing to do for that person is to look for
alternatives or solutions to address the problem.
● When one of the conflicting requirements overrides the other, we
have a conflict but not a genuine moral dilemma.
● We cannot deny that there are conflicting duties (moral requirements) here,
but we need to note that we want a fuller knowledge of the situation:
1. Is an important purpose being served by my getting home early?
2. How serious is the condition of the sick old man?
Indeed, I could hardly decide which option is morally right in this situation.
02
Ontological
Moral Dilemma
Ontological Moral Dilemma
Situations wherein two or more moral requirements conflict
with each other, yet neither of these conflicting moral
requirements overrides each other. This is not to say that
the moral agent does not know which moral requirement is
stronger than the other. The point is that neither of the
moral requirements is stronger than the other; hence, the
moral agent can hardly choose between the conflicting
moral requirements.
Example:
● For instance, a military doctor is attending to the needs of the wounded
soldiers in the middle of the war. Unfortunately, two soldiers urgently need a
blood transfusion. However, only one bag of blood is available at the moment.
● For sure, we could not tell whether administering a blood transfusion to Soldier
A is more moral than administering a blood transfusion to Soldier B, and vice
versa.
03
Self-imposed
Moral Dilemma
Caused by the moral agent’s wrongdoings.
Example:
● David is running for the position of the town mayor. During the campaign
period, he promised the indigenous peoples in his community to protect their
virgin forest just to gain their votes, but at the same time, he seeks financial
support from a mining corporation.
● Fortunately, David won the elections, yet he is faced with the dilemma of
fulfilling his promised to the indigenous peoples and at the same time allows
the mining corporation to destroy their forest.
● Indeed, through his own actions, David created a situation in which it is
impossible for him to be discharged from both obligations.
04
World-Imposed
Dilemma
World-Imposed Dilemma
• means that certain events in the world place the agent
in a situation of moral conflict.
● The philosopher told his student that there was no correct or incorrect
decision. Neither moral codes nor the strength of his affections for
one or the other party could determine what to do; rather, the student
had to “invent” his own solution to the problem.
06
Single Agent
Dilemma
Single Agent Dilemma
The agent “ought, all things considered, to do A, ought, all
things considered, to do B, and she cannot do both A and
B”. In other words, the moral agent is compelled to act
on two or more equally the same moral options but
she cannot choose both.
Example:
● For instance, a medical doctor found out that her patient has HIV. For
sure, the medical doctor may experience tension between the legal
requirement to report the case and the desire to respect
confidentiality, although the medical code of ethics acknowledges our
obligation to follow legal requirements and to intervene to protect the
vulnerable
07
Multi-person Dilemma
Multi-person Dilemma
The multi-person dilemma occurs in situations that
involve several persons like a family, an
organization, or a community who is expected to
come up with consensual decision on a moral issue
at hand.
Example:
● An organization may have to choose between complying with the wage law by
cutting its workforce or by retaining its current workforce by paying them below
the required minimum wage.
● The multi-person dilemma requires more than choosing what is right, it also
entails that the persons involved reached a general consensus.
● In such a manner, the moral obligation to do what is right becomes more
complicated. On the one hand, the integrity of the decision ought to be
defended on moral grounds. On the other hand, the decision must also
prevent the organization from breaking apart”.
Questions?
Thank you for Listening!