Case On Learning Development
Case On Learning Development
Suppose Mars & Meiji is one of the world's largest confectionery businesses with significant
market share in many of the world's biggest confectionery markets, including many emerging
markets. It has a long and proud tradition, stretching back more than 150 years, including a long
history of developing its employees, which has remained part of its ethos during its progress to
becoming a global company.
Despite very positive sales figures over the last 12 months, Mars & Meiji has prioritized
streamlining the business to make it more competitive and has placed a strong emphasis on
reducing cost over the next 18 months. Despite being keen to preserve its longstanding reputation
as a firm that is committed to developing all its employees, in respect of learning and development,
this ‘streamlining’ activity has focused on:
The most important driver of the assessment of its training provision at Mars & Meiji is change.
Whilst performing well in the marketplace, senior management continue to express discontent with
levels of productivity and employee performance. Moreover, senior management has determined
that the company needs to become more flexible and adaptable to respond to change in its market
context, for example by an ability to adapt organizational structures to meet new business needs
or through the introduction of technological innovation. However, as a traditionally minded
employer, and with low levels of employee turnover at shop-floor level, Mars & Meiji appears to
have instilled in its workers a mindset of stability and steady progress, which is at odds with
competition in a rapidly changing global economy. Therefore, Mars & Meiji wants to move
towards a system of continuous improvement by creating a culture whereby workers are
empowered to implement small incremental changes, rather than have substantial change imposed
on them from time to time.
Whilst workers can put themselves forward for training courses, including those provided by local
education providers, there is no formal channel for doing this and access to such training often
comes down to personal relationships and the constraints imposed by departmental budgets. The
culture at Mars & Meiji is very much one in which training needs are typically
identified for workers rather than by workers.
Delivery of Training
Currently, the company runs a number of large training events each year designed to update
manufacturing staff on everything from health and safety changes, business strategy and company
performance to the adoption of new production technology. This is sometimes coupled with skills
training for these workers as and when appropriate. This has traditionally been done at the
specialist training center at their largest production facility, which doubles as the company’s
headquarters. This practice partly stems from a time when the company only operated two
production facilities in the country. It now operates across six geographically dispersed locations.
Workers tend to view these training events as a bit of a waste of time, particularly when they are
delivered by consultants with little real understanding of working processes at Mars & Meiji It is
not unknown for workers to claim that the training they receive is outdated and tells them nothing
that they don’t already know.
The Head of Learning and Development, responding to a call to cut costs from the CHRO, is now
of the opinion, however, that such long training programs, often of up to three or four days, are no
longer the most cost-effective and efficient means by which to develop the staff. Such training has
the dual problem of requiring regular investment and repeat sessions to cover workers on different
shifts or at different plants, as well as leading to undesirable downtime of certain aspects of
production. In particular, the Head of L&D is keen to reduce a reliance on external training
providers to design and deliver interventions to different workforce groups, from senior
management to shop floor workers.
Moreover, the company has historically not evaluated the impact of these events. In the new era
of cost-cutting and added value, however, the company is keen to ensure that the impact of all
training interventions, however big or small, is measured.
Ray Barbie, the head of learning and development at Mars & Meiji recently attended a seminar at
a local university on ‘the changing nature of workplace HRD’. He was slightly alarmed to find out
that much of the company’s practice was seen as outdated. In particular, he was interested in
examining how some more contemporary approaches and techniques in HRD could help the
company both reduce costs and better performance through continuous improvement.