Chapter 02 - Structure and Synthesis of PFD
Chapter 02 - Structure and Synthesis of PFD
CHAPTER 2
1
The evolution of every process follows a similar path.
The resulting processes will often be quite different,
but the series of steps that have been followed to
produce the final processes are similar.
2
Generic Structure of Process Flow Diagrams
3
Hierarchy of Conceptual Process Design
1. Decide whether the process will be batch
or continuous.
5
Hierarchy of Conceptual Process Design
Step 1 — Batch vs. Continuous Process
Factor Batch Processes (< 500 t/y) Continuous Processes (> 5000 t/y)
Size Smaller throughput favors batch Economies of scale favor
operations. As throughput continuous processes for large
increases, the required size of throughput.
the process equipment increases,
and the technical difficulties
of moving large amounts of
chemicals from equipment to
equipment rapidly increase.
6
Hierarchy of Conceptual Process Design
Step 1 — Batch vs. Continuous Process
7
Hierarchy of Conceptual Process Design
Step 1 — Batch vs. Continuous Process
8
Hierarchy of Conceptual Process Design
Step 1 — Batch vs. Continuous Process
9
Hierarchy of Conceptual Process Design
Step 1 — Batch vs. Continuous Process
11
Hierarchy of Conceptual Process Design
Step 1 — Batch vs. Continuous Process
12
Hierarchy of Conceptual Process Design
Step 1 — Batch vs. Continuous Process
13
Hierarchy of Conceptual Process Design
Step 1 — Batch vs. Continuous Process
14
Hierarchy of Conceptual Process Design
Step 1 — Batch vs. Continuous Process
15
Hierarchy of Conceptual Process Design
Step 1 — Batch vs. Continuous Process
16
Hierarchy of Conceptual Process Design
Step 1 — Batch vs. Continuous Process
17
Hierarchy of Conceptual Process Design
Step 2 — Process Input-Output Structure
Process Concept Diagram
A diagram uses the stoichiometry of the main reaction pathway to
identify the feed and product chemicals.
18
Input- Output Structure of the PFD
20
Hierarchy of Conceptual Process Design
Step 2 — Process Input-Output Structure
Generic Block Flow Process Diagram
Each of the process blocks may contain several unit operation.
Several process blocks may be required in a given process, e.g,
multiple process blocks in a single process.
Each unit operation can be placed into one of these blocks.
21
Hierarchy of Conceptual Process Design
Step 2 — Process Input-Output Structure
Process Flow Diagram
The PFD, by convention, shows the process feed stream(s) entering
from the left and the process product stream(s) leaving to the right.
Toluene hydrodealkylation process
22
Hierarchy of Conceptual Process Design
Step 2 — Process Input-Output Structure
Utility Streams
Utility streams, such as cooling water, steam, fuel, and electricity,
rarely directly contact the process streams. They usually provide or
remove thermal energy or work.
Utility streams for Toluene hydrodealkylation process
23
Hierarchy of Conceptual Process Design
Step 2 — Process Input-Output Structure
Other Considerations: Feed Purity and Trace Components
➢ In general, the feed streams entering a process do not contain pure
chemicals. The option always exists to purify further the feed to
the process. (Purification before feeding ?)
➢ The question of whether this purification step should be performed
can only be answered by a detailed economic analysis.
➢ However, some common-sense heuristics may be used to choose a
good base case or starting point. The following heuristics are
modified from Douglas [1].
24
Hierarchy of Conceptual Process Design
Step 2 — Process Input-Output Structure
Heuristics: Feed Purity and Trace Components
➢ If the impurities are not present in large quantities (say < 10 ∼
20%) and these impurities do not react to form by-products, then
do not separate them prior to feeding to the process.
For example, the hydrogen fed to the toluene HDA process contains a small
amount of methane (5 mol%–see “Stream 3 in Table 1.5”). Since the methane
does not react (it is inert) and it is present as a small quantity, it is probably not
worth considering separating it from the hydrogen.
➢ If the separation of the impurities is difficult (for example, an
impurity forms an azeotrope with the feed or the feed is a gas at
the feed conditions), then do not separate them prior to feeding to
the process.
For example, again consider the methane in Stream 3. The separation of
methane and hydrogen is relatively expensive (see “Example 2.3”) because it
involves low temperature and/or high pressure. This fact, coupled with the
reasons given above, means that separation of the feed would not normally be
attempted.
25
Hierarchy of Conceptual Process Design
Step 2 — Process Input-Output Structure
Heuristics: Feed Purity and Trace Components
➢ If the impurities foul or poison the catalyst, then purify the feed.
For example, one of the most common catalyst poisons is sulfur. This is
especially true for catalysts containing Group VIII metals such as iron, cobalt,
nickel, palladium, and platinum [7]. In the steam reformation of natural gas
(methane) to produce hydrogen, the catalyst is rapidly poisoned by the small
amounts of sulfur in the feed. A guard bed of activated carbon (or zinc oxide)
is placed upstream of the reactor to reduce the sulfur level in the natural gas to
the low ppm level.
➢ If the impurity reacts to form difficult-to-separate or hazardous
products, then purify the feed.
For example, in the manufacture of isocyanates for use in the production
of polyurethanes, the most common synthesis path involves the reaction of
phosgene with the appropriate amine [8]. Because phosgene is a highly toxic
chemical, all phosgene is manufactured on-site via the reaction of chlorine and
carbon monoxide.
C O + Cl 2 −→ C OC l 2 (phosgene)
26
Hierarchy of Conceptual Process Design
Step 2 — Process Input-Output Structure
Heuristics: Feed Purity and Trace Components
If carbon monoxide is not readily available (by pipeline), then it must be
manufactured via the steam reformation of natural gas. The following equation
shows the overall main reaction (carbon dioxide may also be formed in the
process but it is not considered here):
CH 4 + H 2 O → C O + 3H2
The question to ask is, at what purity must the carbon monoxide be fed to the
phosgene unit? The answer depends on what happens to the impurities in the
CO . The main impurity is hydrogen. The hydrogen reacts with the chlorine to
form hydrogen chloride that is difficult to remove from the phosgene, is highly
corrosive, and is detrimental to the isocyanate product. With this information, it
makes more sense to remove the hydrogen to the desired level in the carbon
monoxide stream rather than send it through with the C O and cause more
separation problems in the phosgene unit and further downstream. Acceptable
hydrogen levels in carbon monoxide feeds to phosgene units are less than 1%.
27
Hierarchy of Conceptual Process Design
Step 2 — Process Input-Output Structure
Heuristics: Feed Purity and Trace Components
28
Hierarchy of Conceptual Process Design
Step 2 — Process Input-Output Structure
Addition of Feeds Required to Stabilize Products or Enable Separations
➢ Generally, product specifications are given as a series of characteristics that the
product stream must meet or exceed. Clearly, the purity of the main chemical in
the product is the major concern. However, other specifications such as color,
density or specific gravity, turbidity, and so on, may also be specified.
➢ Often many of these specifications can be met in a single piece or train of
separation equipment. However, if the product stream is, for example, reactive
or unstable, then additional stabilizing chemicals may need to be added to the
product prior to it going to storage. These stabilizing chemicals are additional
feed streams to the process.
➢ The same argument can be made for other chemicals such as solvent or catalyst
that are effectively consumed in the process. If a solvent such as water or an
organic chemical is required to make a separation take place, for example,
absorption of a solvent-soluble chemical from a gas stream, then this solvent is
an additional feed to the process. Accounting for these chemicals both in feed
costs and in the overall material balance (in the product streams) is very
important. 29
Hierarchy of Conceptual Process Design
Step 2 — Process Input-Output Structure
Inert Feed Material to Control Exothermic Reactions
➢ In some cases, it may be necessary to add additional inert feed streams to the
process in order to control the reactions taking place. Common examples of this
are partial oxidation reactions of hydrocarbons.
➢ For example, consider the partial oxidation of propylene to give acrylic acid, an
important chemical in the production of acrylic polymers. The feeds consist of
nearly pure propylene, air, and steam. The basic reactions that take place are:
3O
C 3H 6 + 2 2 → C3H4O2 + H2O Reaction 1
5O
C 3H 6 + 2 2 → C2H4O2 + H2O + CO 2 Reaction 2
9O
C 3H 6 + 2 2 → 3H2O + CO 2 Reaction 3
All these reactions are highly exothermic, not limited by equilibrium, and
potentially explosive. In order to eliminate or reduce the potential for explosion,
steam is fed to the reactor to dilute the feed and provide thermal ballast to
absorb the heat of reaction and make control easier.
30
Hierarchy of Conceptual Process Design
Step 2 — Process Input-Output Structure
Inert Feed Material to Control Exothermic Reactions
➢ In some processes, enough steam (or other inert stream) is added to move the
reaction mixture out of the flammability limits, thus eliminating the potential for
explosion. The steam (or other inert stream) is considered a feed to the process,
must be separated, and leaves as a product, by-product, or waste stream.
31
Hierarchy of Conceptual Process Design
Step 2 — Process Input-Output Structure
Inert Feed Material to Control Equilibrium Reactions
32
Information Obtained From Input-Output Diagram
33
Profit Margin (PM)
34
Profit Margin (PM)
35
Example 2.1
From Tables 8.3 and 8.4, we get the following prices for raw
materials and products:
Benzene = $ 0.919/kg
Toluene = $ 1.033/kg
37
Despite the results illustrated in Example 2.1, benzene has
been produced for the last 50 years and is a viable raw
material for a host of petrochemical products. How is this
possible?
Benzene can be produced via at least one other route that is
less sensitive to changes in the price of toluene, benzene, and
natural gas.
One such commercial process is the disproportionation or
transalkylation of toluene to benzene and a mixture of para-,
ortho-,and meta-xylene by the following reaction:
2C7H8 C6H6 + C8H10
Value of Products
78 kg of Benzene = (78 kg)($0.919/kg)= $ 71.68
106 kg of xylene = (106 kg)($0.82/kg) = $ 86.92
39
Example 2.2
Margin
Profit Margin = 86.92 + 71.68– 190.07= -$ 31.47 or -$0.171/kg
toluene feed
Based on the results of Example 2.2, the production of benzene via the
disproportionation of toluene is better than the toluene HDA process but
is still unprofitable.
However, a closer look at the cost of purified xylenes (from Table 8.4)
shows that these purified xylenes are considerably more valuable ($1.235
to $2.91) than the mixed xylene stream
($0.82/kg).
Therefore, the addition of a xylene purification section to the
disproportionation process might well yield a potentially profitably
process that is worth further, more-detailed analysis.
40
Hierarchy of Conceptual Process Design
Step 3 — The Recycle Structure of the Process
➢ This step basically involves the recovery of materials and energy
from the process. It may be instructive to break down the operating
costs for a typical chemical process.
➢ Peters and Timmerhaus suggest that raw materials make up
between 10% and 50% of the total operating costs for processing
plants; however, due to increasing conservation and waste
minimization techniques this estimate may be low, and an upper
limit of 75% is more realistic.
➢ Because these raw materials are so valuable, it is imperative that
we be able to separate and recycle unused reactants.
➢ The extent of recycling of unused reactants depends largely on the
ease with which these unreacted raw materials can be separated
(and purified) from the products that are formed within thereactor.
41
Hierarchy of Conceptual Process Design
Step 3 — The Recycle Structure of the Process
Efficiency of Raw Material Usage
• SPC tells us how much of the reactant that enters the reactor is
reacted.
44
Efficiency of Raw Material Usage
45
Efficiency of Raw Material Usage
Yield
46
3 Basic Recycle Structures
2C6H6 C12H10 + H2
47
Separate and purify
48
Example 2.3
For the separation of methane and hydrogen, first look at distillation:
This will be very costly and suggests that distillation is not the best
operation for this separation.
49
Other Separation Techniques
• Absorption
It might be possible to absorb or scrub the methane from
streams 8 and 17 into a hydrocarbon liquid. However, suitable liquids
have to be identified considering the solubility parameters for both
methane and hydrogen in the different liquids.
• Pressure-Swing Adsorption
Using a pressure-swing adsorption, the methane would be
preferentially adsorbed on to the surface of a sorbent, and the stream
leaving the unit would contain a higher proportion of hydrogen than the
feed. This could be applied to the HDA process
• Membrane Separation
Hydrogen passes more readily through certain membranes than
does methane. This could be applied to the HDA process
50
Example 2.4
Distillation
51
Hierarchy of Conceptual Process Design
Step 3 — The Recycle Structure of the Process
Recycle Feed and Product Together with a Purge Stream
If separation of unreacted feed and products is not accomplished easily, then
recycling both feed and product should be considered.
Recycle structure of hydrogen stream.
Methane is purged via stream 16.
52
Hierarchy of Conceptual Process Design
Step 3 — The Recycle Structure of the Process
Recycle Feed and Product Together with a Purge Stream
53
Hierarchy of Conceptual Process Design
Step 3 — The Recycle Structure of the Process
Recycle Feed and Product Together without a Purge Stream
This recycle scheme is only feasible when product can react further in reactor and
therefore there is no need to purge it from the process. (2 C6H6 = C12H10 + H 2 )
Because diphenyl reacts back to benzene, it can
be recycled without purging it from the system.
54
Example 2.5
Consider the following two process alternatives for the toluene
HDA process when the side reaction of benzene to form diphenyl
occurs.
Alternative A
As recycle
increases,
Equip and
Op costs
increases
2C6H6 C12H10 + H2
55
Example 2.5 (cont.)
Extra
tower with
associated
operating
costs
56
Example 2.5 (cont.)
57
Hierarchy of Conceptual Process Design
Step 3 — The Recycle Structure of the Process
Other Issues Affecting the Recycle Structure
58
Other Issues Affecting the Recycle Structure
59
Other Issues Affecting the Recycle Structure
60
Other Issues Affecting the Recycle Structure
62
Example 2.6 (cont.)
Components in reactor effluent listed in order of decreasing volatility
• Ethylene (C2H4)
• Methanol (MeOH)
• Ethanol (EtOH)
• Water (H2O)
63
Example 2.6 (cont.)
Azeotropes
The mixed alcohol stream is available at a relatively low price from a local source
($0.75/kg). However, pure methanol ($0.672/kg) and/or ethanol
($1.138/kg) streams may be purchased if necessary. The selling price for
DME, DEE, and ethylene are $0.841/kg, $1.75/kg, and $1.488/kg,
respectively. Preliminary market surveys indicate that we can sell up to
15,000 tonne/y of DEE and up to 10,000 tonne/y of ethylene.
For a proposed process to produce 50,000 tonnes/y of DME, determine what are
the viable process alternatives?
64
Example 2.6 (cont.)
65
Example 2.6 (cont.)
66
Example 2.6 (cont.)
Important Points
Because making ethylene is far less profitable. In
addition, the maximum amount of DEE that the market
can support is not currently being produced. Therefore,
supplementing the feed with ethanol should be
considered.
Since the main feed stream contains both reactants
and an impurity (water), separation or purification
of the feed prior to processing should be
considered.
In order to minimize the production of by-products
(ethylene), the selectivity of the DEE reaction should
be optimized.
67
Example 2.6 (cont.)
68
Example 2.6 (cont.)
69
Example 2.6 (cont.)
70
Example 2.6 (cont.)
71
Hierarchy of Conceptual Process Design
72