GROUP ASSIGNMENT : MARKING SCHEME

TECHNOLOGY PARK MALAYSIA

CT006-3-0-ICAN
INTRODUCTION TO COMPUTER ARCHITECTURE AND NETWORKING
UCFF2107CT

LECTURER : Ms.Vijayalaxmi
No. Student Name * TP Number
1.
2.
3.
4.

 Name of the group leader

Criteria Marks Allocation Marks Obtained

Part A : Group Proposal 30%
Part B : Documentation 70%
Total 100%

Criteria Marks Allocation Marks Obtained

Part C : Presentation 10%
Marking Guide (Group Proposal – 30 Marks)

Section A : Group Proposal

Marking Criteria 1 2 3 4 5
(Fail) (Marginal Fail) (Pass) (Credit) (Distinction)
Introduction of Chosen No introduction to the Introduction to system Introduction to system Introduction to system Introduction to system
System system with pictures and with pictures and with pictures and with exceptional
images, but not clear images with clear images with clear explanations with
explanations explanations and pictures and images
proper citations and citations

History of Chosen No history included History explained but History explained with History with pictures History with
System not clear with pictures pictures and images and images with clear exceptional
and images with clear explanations explanations and explanations with
proper citations pictures and images
with citations

Importance of chosen No functionality and Functionality explained Functionality and Functionality and Functionality and
system and its purpose included but not clear or missing purpose explained with purpose explained with purpose explained
functionalities and the purpose with no images and pictures pictures and images exceptional well with
purpose pictures or images with clear explanations and proper citations pictures and images
and proper citations

Justification of No mention of reason Incomplete number of 3 reasons included with 3 reasons included with 3 reasons included with
choosing the system of choosing system reasons or combined or proper explanations proper explanations proper explanations
merged as one with no with no proper and justifications and and exceptionally good
justifications citations some citations included justifications and
proper citations
included

System Architecture No diagram provided Diagram is stated but Diagram included with Diagram included with Diagram included with
diagram with with missing either self-made or either self -made or either self- made or
explanations on the components or sourced with some sourced with clear sourced with clear
components incomplete no proper explanations on details on functions details on functions
explanations components and explanations with and citations and
citation (if any) exceptionally good/
unique

Referencing No referencing Referencing included Referencing include Referencing included Referencing included
included not complete or not complete or well with proper correctly with proper
insufficient insufficient (did not format (both in text format (both in text
match in-text and end- and end text correlates and end text correlates
text citations well) well) Updated / Recent
sources
 Marking Guide (Individual Research – 70 Marks)

0-2 3-4 5-6 7-8 9-10

Marking Criteria
(Fail) (Marginal Fail) (Pass) (Credit) (Distinction)

Introduction to Chosen No explanations of Features listed but no Features discussed by Features discussed Features discussed
Communication Features features provided clear explanations with simple clearly with clear well and exceptionally
given explanations and not explanations on their good with citations
sufficient exploration functions and and diagrams of
of the features and no capabilities. Some pictures to show
citations citation provided evidence of current
research findings

0-4 5-8 9-12 13-16 17-20

Marking Criteria
(Fail) (Marginal Fail) (Pass) (Credit) (Distinction)

Networking Components No mention of Some basic listing and Statement and Statement and Statement of
– Hardware and Protocols hardware and explanation of explanations of explanations of explanations of
protocols explanations hardware and hardware and hardware and hardware and
provided protocols mentioned protocols provided but protocols provided but protocols provided
no support with with sufficient exceptionally good
citations citations with current
referencing and
citations provided

Functionality of the No mention of Some basic statement Functions explained Functions explained Functions explained
system function of system of functions given but with diagrams and well with diagrams properly and unique
not sufficient images with some and justifications with with current citations
explanations evidence of citations evidence of citations to support evidence of
latest updates in the
system

Current issues (with No mention of current Some basic statement Explanations provided Explanations provided Explanations given
suggestion of development and given but not on this with some on current exceptionally well
improvements) improvements supported with basic citations to developments of with good recent
evidence support explanations system updates citations and future
improvements
Marking Guide (Presentation – 10 Marks)

0-1 2 3 4 5
Marking Criteria
(Fail) (Marginal Fail) (Pass) (Credit) (Distinction)

No presentation / Poor presentation flow, Good presentation flow Very good presentation Exceptionally good
Incomplete with weak selection of with proper flow, fully organized presentation flow with
presentation content presented. organization of ideas. with some creativity in highly creative ideas to
delivering the content. capture audience
Quality of Content / Presentation content is Presentation content is attention.
Creativity not relevant to partially relevant to Presentation content is
community and community and relevant to community Show good ability to
workplace workplace and workplace relate knowledge
gained to community
and workplace

No presentation / very Demonstrate weak Demonstrate above Demonstrate good Excellent presentation
weak presentation presentation skills with average presentation presentation skills with skills, clear and precise
skills. Not able to some lacking in skills with some degree high level of communication with
Presentation Skills communicate well. confidence. Not able to of confidence. Explain confidence and very high level of
explain the ideas well, the ideas with minimal professionalism. Able professionalism.
merely reading from professionalism. to explain the ideas
slides. well.