Scribd
Upload
84 views1 page

Peer Evaluation Form 09

This document contains a peer evaluation form for a professor at California State University, Fresno. The form has 4 categories to evaluate: [1] Course content, including currency, appropriateness, and sequencing; [2] Instructional design like objectives, syllabus, materials and technology use; [3] Instructional delivery including presentation, communication and learning environment; and [4] Assessment methods for measuring and feedback on student learning. For each category the evaluator rates the professor from 1-5 and can include comments to elaborate on strengths and weaknesses.

Uploaded by

hr. newvilldesignplt
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
84 views1 page

Peer Evaluation Form 09

This document contains a peer evaluation form for a professor at California State University, Fresno. The form has 4 categories to evaluate: [1] Course content, including currency, appropriateness, and sequencing; [2] Instructional design like objectives, syllabus, materials and technology use; [3] Instructional delivery including presentation, communication and learning environment; and [4] Assessment methods for measuring and feedback on student learning. For each category the evaluator rates the professor from 1-5 and can include comments to elaborate on strengths and weaknesses.

Uploaded by

hr. newvilldesignplt
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

Print Form

California State University, Fresno


UNIVERSITY-WIDE PEER EVALUATION FORM
Enter Department

Professor Evaluated:

Rank: Course: Term/Year:

Date of Classroom Visitation:

Name of Evaluator Signature:

Ratings Scale: 5 = superior | 4 = above average | 3 = average | 2 = below average | 1 = weak


Category Rating (1-5)
A. Course Content. The assessment of course content shall include a review of the
currency of the content of a course, the appropriateness of the level of the content of a
course, and the appropriateness of the sequencing of the content to best achieve the
learning objectives for the course.
COMMENTS:

B. Instructional Design. The assessment of the instructional design of the course shall
include a review of learning objectives, syllabi, instructional support materials,
organization of lectures, and the use of technology appropriate to the class.
COMMENTS:

C. Instructional Delivery. The assessment of delivery shall include a review of oral


presentation skills, written communication skills, skills using various forms of informational
technology, and the ability to create an overall environment conducive to student learning.
COMMENTS:

D. Assessment Methods. The evaluation of assessment methods shall consist of a


review of the tools, procedures, and strategies used for measuring student learning, and
providing timely and meaningful feedback to students.
COMMENTS:

Additional comments may be included on the reverse side of this form.


APM 322c

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy