0% found this document useful (0 votes)
10 views7 pages

Spss

This document analyzes risk factors for KEK (cumulative frequency of 50% KEK and 50% not KEK). It finds: 1) Mothers at risk due to age had higher KEK frequency (52.9% vs 26.5%). 2) Lower education was associated with higher KEK frequency (61.8% vs 32.4%). 3) Lower economic status was associated with higher KEK frequency (58.8% vs 26.5%).

Uploaded by

Lola
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
10 views7 pages

Spss

This document analyzes risk factors for KEK (cumulative frequency of 50% KEK and 50% not KEK). It finds: 1) Mothers at risk due to age had higher KEK frequency (52.9% vs 26.5%). 2) Lower education was associated with higher KEK frequency (61.8% vs 32.4%). 3) Lower economic status was associated with higher KEK frequency (58.8% vs 26.5%).

Uploaded by

Lola
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 7

Lampiran

Kejadian KEK

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

Valid KEK 34 50.0 50.0 50.0

Tidak KEK 34 50.0 50.0 100.0

Total 68 100.0 100.0

Usia Ibu

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

Valid Beresiko 27 39.7 39.7 39.7

Tidak Beresiko 41 60.3 60.3 100.0

Total 68 100.0 100.0


Pendidikan

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

Valid Rendah 32 47.1 47.1 47.1

Tinggi 36 52.9 52.9 100.0

Total 68 100.0 100.0


Status Ekonomi

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

Valid Rendah 29 42.6 42.6 42.6

Tinggi 39 57.4 57.4 100.0

Total 68 100.0 100.0

Crosstabs

Usia Ibu * Kejadian KEK

Crosstab

Kejadian KEK

KEK Tidak KEK Total

Usia Ibu Beresiko Count 18 9 27

% within Kejadian KEK 52.9% 26.5% 39.7%

Tidak Beresiko Count 16 25 41

% within Kejadian KEK 47.1% 73.5% 60.3%

Total Count 34 34 68

% within Kejadian KEK 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%


Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-


Value df sided) sided) sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 4.976a 1 .026

Continuity Correctionb 3.931 1 .047

Likelihood Ratio 5.050 1 .025

Fisher's Exact Test .046 .023

Linear-by-Linear Association 4.902 1 .027

N of Valid Casesb 68

a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 13,50.

b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate

95% Confidence Interval

Value Lower Upper

Odds Ratio for Usia Ibu


3.125 1.130 8.639
(Beresiko / Tidak Beresiko)

For cohort Kejadian KEK =


1.708 1.072 2.724
KEK

For cohort Kejadian KEK =


.547 .304 .983
Tidak KEK

N of Valid Cases 68

Pendidikan * Kejadian KEK

Crosstab

Kejadian KEK

KEK Tidak KEK Total

Pendidikan Rendah Count 21 11 32

% within Kejadian KEK 61.8% 32.4% 47.1%

Tinggi Count 13 23 36

% within Kejadian KEK 38.2% 67.6% 52.9%

Total Count 34 34 68

% within Kejadian KEK 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%


Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-


Value df sided) sided) sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 5.903a 1 .015

Continuity Correctionb 4.781 1 .029

Likelihood Ratio 5.993 1 .014

Fisher's Exact Test .028 .014

Linear-by-Linear Association 5.816 1 .016

N of Valid Casesb 68

a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 16,00.

b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate

95% Confidence Interval

Value Lower Upper

Odds Ratio for Pendidikan


3.378 1.246 9.157
(Rendah / Tinggi)

For cohort Kejadian KEK =


1.817 1.100 3.001
KEK

For cohort Kejadian KEK =


.538 .314 .921
Tidak KEK

N of Valid Cases 68

Status Ekonomi * Kejadian KEK


Crosstab

Kejadian KEK

KEK Tidak KEK Total

Status Ekonomi Rendah Count 20 9 29

% within Kejadian KEK 58.8% 26.5% 42.6%

Tinggi Count 14 25 39

% within Kejadian KEK 41.2% 73.5% 57.4%

Total Count 34 34 68

% within Kejadian KEK 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-


Value df sided) sided) sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 7.275a 1 .007

Continuity Correctionb 6.012 1 .014

Likelihood Ratio 7.424 1 .006

Fisher's Exact Test .014 .007

Linear-by-Linear Association 7.168 1 .007

N of Valid Casesb 68

a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 14,50.

b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate

95% Confidence Interval

Value Lower Upper

Odds Ratio for Status


3.968 1.426 11.040
Ekonomi (Rendah / Tinggi)

For cohort Kejadian KEK =


1.921 1.183 3.121
KEK

For cohort Kejadian KEK =


.484 .268 .874
Tidak KEK

N of Valid Cases 68

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy