Lecture 2 Origin of Life
Lecture 2 Origin of Life
2
It is estimated that the age of the earth is somewhere between 4.5 to 4.7 billion
years. The oldest rocks are believed to be 3.2 billion years old, and must have had a
solid crust, 'lithosphere' (according to some other estimates, these are 3.8 billion
years old).
The first sedimentary rocks are 2.7 to 3.2 billion years old, suggesting that there was
weathering of rocks exposed to the atmosphere. Also there is evidence that the
earliest rocks perhaps solidified under water, suggesting that hydrosphere antedates
the lithosphere (hydrosphere is believed to have originated 3.6 billion years ago).
3
By the time the first sediments were being deposited, the original atmosphere
consisting of methane (CH4), ammonia (NH3) and hydrogen (H2) disappeared and was
replaced by a secondary atmosphere consisting of water vapour (H2O), carbon
dioxide (CO2), carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen (N2), sulphur dioxide (SO2) and
hydrochloric acid (HCI). Whatever ammonia remained was dissolved in the sea.
4
It is believed that the first life (simple bacteria with no nuclei) on this Earth appeared
some 3.5 billion years ago. According to some recent studies conducted in Australia
(reported in a 1999 issue of the journal Science, published from USA), the eukaryotes
existed on this earth as far back as 2.7 billion years ago (earlier these were believed
to have originated only 2.2 to 1.7 billion years ago).
The higher organisms (e.g. flowering plants) appeared as far back as 1.2 billion to 1
billion years ago, so that there is a gap of 1.5 billion years between the appearance of
the first eukaryotes and the higher eukaryotes.
5
Gaia is a Greek name of the 'Goddess Earth', and is associated with a hypothesis
concerning atmosphere and the surface of the earth as a whole. `Gala hypothesis',
initiated in 1954, by G.E. Hutchinson (later progressively established by the efforts of
Lovelock, Hitchcock and Margulis) assumes that there is a 'control system' or `Gaia'
under which life on earth influences and interacts with atmospheric gases and earth's
surface.
A certain set of environmental characters and their interaction, actually led to the
organization of life or the `prebiotic evolution' on Earth
According to ‘Gaia hypothesis', an information about the composition of atmosphere
of a planet is sufficient to tell us about the presence of life on this planet, without any
actual visit to this planet. For instance the near-equilibrium state (as the
compositions shown above) and the absence of fluid medium or open bodies of
water (as known for Venus and Mars) suggest absence of life.
6
The oldest fossils belonging to the blue-green algae were found in sediments in South
Africa dated 3.2 billion years ago. Between these times i.e. from 3.6. to 3.2 billion
years ago (a period of 400 million years) the general conditions on the earth were
supposed to be as follows : moderately saline and shallow alkaline seas initially
covered all the surface, but later some of the surface was lifted above sea level about
3.2 billion years ago. The atmosphere was a reducing one (mainly containing
methane, ammonia, water vapour, hydrogen and very little oxygen) rather than an
oxidising one as now. There was free oxygen, although it could appear due to
photolysis of water (2H2O = 2H2 + O2).
7
Such free oxygen immediately combined to form CO, CO2, SO2 or SiO2 rendering the
atmosphere an anaerobic one. Radiations from sun were more intense. There were
also common electric discharges (lightening), storms, rains and volcanic activity which
provided energy to sponsor chemical reactions forming complex organic substances,
which might have undergone abiotic condensation in the primitive sea, to form
polypeptides, polysaccharides lipids, polynucleotides, etc.
8
Living systems on earth are all composed of carbon compounds. In other words, they
are made up of organic living matter as opposed to organic non-living matter.
However, the important question is whether the organic compounds can be formed
spontaneously under a particular set of conditions in the absence of any living agent.
Answer to this question has been sought in the last few decades and positive results
were obtained.
9
However, while defining life, three important attributes are described. These are
metabolism, growth and reproduction.
In any case, during origin of life, the transition from non-living to living should have
been rather gradual (continuing for about 1500 million years according to some
estimates). Therefore, at one stage systems would be available which are neither fully
alive, nor simply inorganic. Whether we call them alive or non-living would not
matter, as long, as we can find out how life having the three attributes described
above originated.
10
According to most of the current ideas, life originated in a primordial ocean, which
contained all the ingredients necessary to form long polymers (polynucleotides)
capable of undergoing self-replication, mutation and evolution. It is also believed that
subsequent to abiotic synthesis of matter, seas were converted into 'hot dilute soup'
(as described by Haldance) or 'cold dilute soup' (as described by Abelson), which
provided medium for origin of life.
There are arguments, however, against the above hypothesis of 'prebiotic soup'. One
of these arguments is based on the thermodynamics and kinetics of
polycondensation in aqueous solution. Because hydrolysis will always limit chain
length. It would prevent formation of long polymers, necessary to set up a genetic
system. In contrast, long polynucleotides and polypeptides can be obtained, if
polycondensation takes place on a mineral surface.
In view of this, it was concluded once in 1996, that polymers of life were more likely
baked like `prebiotic crepes' rather than cooked in a ‘prebiotic soup' (French Crepes
are prepared by pouring liquid dough over a hot stone plate, causing the dough to
dehydrate and solidify; this dehydration corresponds to polycondensation).
11
As we know, all living systems consist of organic membranes. Therefore, a mechanism
should be known, which in the past converted the organic molecules into
macromolecules or supramolecular forms, ultimately giving rise to the organic
membrane.
Since compounds like HCN are known to have been present in prebiotic seas and
since these are strong dehydrating agents, a mechanism for the formation of
biologically important C-0, C-N and P-0 bonds could be proposed.
12
Removal of a molecule of water from two molecules of an organ compound like
amino acids will bring about polymerization. These macromolecules would then
aggregate on water surface to give rise monomolecular layer. The monomolecular
layer becomes folded and after attaining certain weight, this material sinks. In this
manner, perhaps phospholipids were formed
13
14
In the early decades of the 20th century, Aleksandr Oparin (in 1924), and John
Haldane (in 1929, before Oparin's first book was translated into English),
independently suggested that if the primitive atmosphere was reducing (as opposed
to oxygen-rich), and if there was an appropriate supply of energy, such as lightning or
ultraviolet light, then a wide range of organic compounds might be synthesised.
A coacervate is a solution of high molecular weight chemicals i.e., proteins,
carbohydrates etc.
15
Oparin believed that life developed from coacervates, microscopic spontaneously
formed spherical aggregates of lipid molecules that are held together by electrostatic
forces and that may have been precursors of cells.
The organic molecules once becoming concentrated should have become organized
into supramolecular structures of some kind. In order to explain this, A.I. Oparin, a
Soviet biologist of great fame, proposed his coavervate model (Fig. 37.3). A
coacervate is a solution of high molecular weight chemicals i.e., proteins,
carbohydrates etc. Under certain conditions this coacervate separates into two
phases, the sol phase and the gel phase. On contact with an aqueous solution, the gel
phase shows osmotic activity and would sustain more rapid reaction bringing about
oxidation, reduction and polymerization. Such systems are called `protobionts' by
Oparin.
16
The coacervates were able to absorb and assimilate organic compounds from the
environment in a way reminiscent of metabolism. They would have taken part in
evolutionary processes, eventually leading to the first lifeforms.
17
Haldane proposed that the primordial sea served as a vast chemical laboratory
powered by solar energy. The atmosphere was oxygen free, and the combination of
carbon dioxide, ammonia and ultraviolet radiation gave rise to a host of organic
compounds. The sea became a 'hot dilute soup' containing large populations of
organic monomers and polymers. Haldane envisaged that groups of monomers and
polymers aquired lipid membranes, and that further developments eventually led to
the first living cells.
Haldane coined the term 'prebiotic soup', and this became a powerful symbol of the
Oparin-Haldane view of the origin of life.
18
An extremophile (from Latin extremus meaning "extreme" and Greek philiā (φιλία)
meaning "love") is an organism that thrives in and even may require physically or
geochemically extreme conditions that are detrimental to the majority of life on
Earth.
Most known extremophiles are microbes. The domain Archaea contains renowned
examples, but extremophiles are present in numerous and diverse genetic lineages of
both bacteria and archaeans.
19
20
21
There was a time, when it was widely believed that life began with 'self-replicating
proteins', and that proteins did have the properties of functioning as a template and
undergoing self-replication. Although, there is no doubt that amino acids were
certainly present in prebiotic Earth, purines (adenine and guanine as building blocks
of nucleic acids) were perhaps also synthesized by polymerization of HCN.
However, when in 1950s, it became evident that nucleic acids and not the proteins
have the ability to self-replicate, it was accepted that nucleic acids rather than
polypeptides might have originated first, or alternatively both (protein and nucleic
acids) must have originated simultaneously.
22
In the 1980s, discovery of RNA molecules with catalytic activity, which earned the
1989 Nobel Prize in Chemistry to Sidney Altman and Thomas Cech, generated interest
in an idea, which assumed that there was a time, before the origin of protein
synthesis, when life was based entirely on RNA. This hypothesis for origin of life
assumed that life first originated as RNA and that proteins and DNA entered the `RNA
World' at a later stage. Even if RNA may not be the first molecule that developed in
the history of origin of life, there is strong evidence that at some stage, soon after the
origin of life, RNA must have been the predominant form of molecules performing
functions of genotype as well as phenotype.
23
The RNA world hypothesis is an idea of how early life on Earth transmitted
information and carried out functions. RNA did everything, stored info., replicated
itself, and carried out enzymatic activity. A – E represent a possible sequence,
although no times can be assigned yet. According to this theory – the last thing that
developed was enzymatic proteins – but new evidence suggests that proteins were
important for the development of tRNAs so they must have been around earlier. Step
B is an area of interest,
as scientists are trying to make an RNA that could replicate any RNA, even itself.
24
25
Recently (1998-99), both theoretical calculations and experiments involving binding
of amino acid to random RNA strands suggested that chemical attractions between
specific base sequences and amino acids perhaps led to the origin of the present day
genetic code.
26
According to one theoretical study, GCU codon (coding for alanine) is so spaced in
many mRNAs that the mRNA will have extensive base pairing with ribosomal RNA.
Since GCU is so common and plays such a basic role in translation, this may represent
an ancient codon word. During evolution, if GCU is accepted as the first codon word,
in the first step, this might have given rise to other words by one nucleotide changes
(e.g. GCU to UCU or GCU to GAU); two and three nucleotides changes might have
originated later.
27
28