We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1
Verbs
Level Description Knowledge dimension Examples
Factual | Conceptual | Procedural | Metacognitive
Creating Tang avers Generate daly] Gather (an expen] Bega fa worRfow | Produce a theoryat [Turn “eguar” ape
Sementstabuisa | sctwtylos team) projet tearing. forlasoga into
completely new teal” reipe by
Stuaure.naio | wrtelashort | bevise(a Develop (an Create(a porto). | nding replacements
ious puting | story dlscfeaton aporoae 0 sohe forcereain ingredient.
various pats together saen), ihe problem Actuaie (the plan). | Explain ny te cosen
‘Ra ‘Combine (the substitutes are better
amponens). | Plan(theaetwtes.| Compose (poet than te ona,
ingredients
Tivont categorie, comple, compare eal, ody, ganas pla, aTange UMM, | wn 4 workin
eee choose, eee estimate, fa esc eet ike up, originate, manual for a ei
edict, propose save, disse, modi, change, improve, adapt, anime, maxim,
laborate, test, improve. Limes . py empires
Evaluating | D=naingyouroum—| check he Define he Tdge ire GeTy | Rela (on He Theor the bat
apnion or presentng | consistency of | relevance fan | ofaproces) progres) Blogging ator for
anew one.Judeie | Sources). outcome). Begrinet explain he
thevalue and quaity Evaluate the Rate the efecsveness | reasons for such
of work information | cacue (an artice). | Review the faghtness ofa ofasuategy. choice,
and ideas, The objectives). technique).
Fusemert ssedon | pank the current Prioritize (the use of | age te fectveness
ouncte et issues). ‘Assess (the likeliness | Conclude (the programs). of a learning style and
ctares. syrents workeng select anopton tats
mechanism) imore effet.
‘Appraise, compare, conclde, defend, describe, daciminate, explain, justi relate,
summarize, suppor, swat decide, determine dispute, messure, mark, recommend, slet,
pre, prove, pecebe wa, erat, hvlucnc,
aa Tariana he Chocse fe Tales] Biguiah Whe] lategrte [he Make [he Teang TT apps or aang
Intormann sna ct th sitiudes), sopored yer notes and tak about
separating nto framework the advantages of each
Component parts. | clasify the words). | tent the levels ‘oly one's one Ad references
Datamining and atavareness). | Compare (the prejudice)
understanding the | order (the opposing Gather the information
ctganzational Importance ofthe | Explain the spproaches) atiewe(aievelof | seout he new
siucure and relation | evens. Imporanee of Understancng). Students and select the
ae oe Understanding the | oiterentiat (ihe best studying programm
teers fuel related terme} forthem.
Breakdown, contst, deconstruct, Hlustate, ney, culling, sled, separate, categorize,
fiscower, eect, divide, examine, inspect, snp, vey, assure, conclude
Applying Sokingprotiens and | Use acarain | Ge (headse), —] Ganryout(the selec (hewatchng | Decdng whether or
deaing with ssues by | algo) teportery tras). | soliton). not increased
‘sing seared set (he objectves the consumption of
knowledge. Applying | answer (the Employ (the Enhance the carrots improves
Stenis tctand | omen ueston). | xpedmen(wh | meth professonal sts). | yeah.
eeiques fone the reacnone
Stuatlons and tasty the between calesat the construct the:eenon | seasure the relabilty
scenarios prints of components) amount ef passble | ofa ste), atest sing statics
funding damage. tas
Teply change compute, cratck demoratate manipulate modi, operate, pedi
prepare, produce show solve, build, choose, develop, itarvew, make we, orgenae,
Experiment, plan, aise, model, ent
Understanding | Balerng eran —[iterpet@ “ategorze he] Paaphrase he] Foreace he compare the man
ideas aswellas | paragraph ees). efron forberer | expermen' outcome). | characters of two
amlating Understanding). devices wth dierent
comparing, caregotze(2 | eserbe herein txplain (te workng. | Hyper at procesors,
interpreting, prodierstestures, | youranm warts) | Garify(he gwen | preps)
ergancing, nd instruction Mate astep-bystep
describing Summarize (an | Consider (the Execute (a particular | explanation of how t
a 3 | article in your own | connection between | Predict (the future of | technique). use a tool for gathering
problem idea,ora | oes trucureandits | anindusty stvstes
words to demonstrate function).
‘your comprehension. |“Comprehend, convert, distinguish, estimate, extend, generalize, transiate, compare, contrast,
demenetate rte, ovine rphace, show, day, ner exempt, ae commer,
Remembering | Aiwemng hie ‘abel (oitesonthe | Recognise (he Racal Row ta | ontine (ha proners a [ Recto a poor ora
Questions ze wellas | map. butnerora Tesearthieywords), | fring anineprton| passage hem a nove
desrisng tems, compostion,
facts and base pen acitfeut Recap(thestepsin | identity the downsides | Name the pce forthe
concepts throws | rd) Name (theleves of | reading the of alearing method). | products and services
poh blac Blooms taxonomy). | agreement). of a company from
Prevousyleamed | uit the European Omit ee inetevart | memory.
information. hs, | aptly) Deveite (the history | Tabula the terminology)
nerescay of anaton). elaborate process
Involve a complete
Understanding of the
meaning.
Ttrieve, state, define, Know, match, reproduce, select, omit, choose, Find, hows relate, Ta,
locate, point out, highiight, bookmark, search.
Lorin W. Anderson, David R. Krathwohl-A Taxonomy For Learning Teaching and Assessing - A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objetives-Longman (2001)