Managerial Economics-BBA-II SEM
Managerial Economics-BBA-II SEM
On
Managerial Economics
BBA First Year, Second Semester
(BBA -204)
Dr.Indal Kumar
Assistant Professor
Department of Management
NEHRU GRAM BHARATI DEEMED TO BE UNIVERSITY, PRAYAGRAJ
Unit 1-INTRODUCATION
Factors affecting Pricing Decision, Pricing under different Market Structure – Perfect,
Imperfect Monopoly, Pricing Strategies.
Unit 5 PROFIT
Reference Book:
Economics is that branch of social science which is concerned with the study of how
individuals, households, firms, industries and government take decision relating to the
allocation of limited resources to productive uses, so as to derive maximum gain or
satisfaction.
Simply put, it is all about the choices we make concerning the use of scarce resources that
have alternative uses, with the aim of satisfying our most pressing infinite wants and
distribute it among ourselves.
Nature of Economics
There is a great controversy among the economists regarding the nature of economics,
whether the subject ‘economics’ is considered as science or an art.
1. Economics as a Science
Before we start discussing whether economics is science or not, it becomes necessary to have
a clear idea about science. Science is a systematic study of knowledge and fact which
develops the correlation-ship between cause and effect. Science is not only the collection of
facts, according to Prof. Poincare, in reality, all the facts must be systematically collected,
classified and analyzed.
The following statements can ensure economics as a positive science, such as;
The ideas of economics are based on absolute logical clarifications and moreover, it develops
relationship between cause and effect.
Economics is not a neutral between positive and normative sciences. According to most
economists, economics is merely positive science rather than normative science.
The following statements can ensure economics as a normative science, such as,
A rational human being has not only logical view but also has sentimental attachments and
emotional views regarding any activity. These emotional attachments are all coming under
normative statements. Hence, economics is a normative science.
Economics is a science of human welfare, All the economic forwarded their theories for the
development of human standard of living Hence, all the economic statements have their
respective normative views.
All these lead us to the conclusion that ‘Economics’ is both positive and normative science. It
does not only tell us why certain things happen however, it also gives idea whether it is right
thing to happen.
2. Economics as an Art
Therefore, from all the above discussions we can conclude that economics is neither a science
nor an art only. However, it is a golden combination of both. According to Cossa, science and
art are complementary to each other. Hence, economics is considered as both a science as
well as an art.
Scope of Economics
Economists differ in their views regarding the scope of economics. The scope of economics’
is a broad subject and encompasses not only its subject matter but also various other things,
such as its scientific nature, its ability to pass value judgments, and to suggest solutions to
practical problems.
By making economics a human science, Robbins has unnecessarily widened the scope of the
subject. Thus, in accordance with the view of Robbins, economics would also study the
problem faced by Robinson Crusoe, who lives in an isolated island with no contact with the
rest of the world.
He has to face the problem of choice between work and leisure. He has to spend some time
for his survival — for collecting fruits and roots. He utilises the rest of his time in sleeping or
enjoying leisure. Thus, he has also to face the problem of distributing his time between
various ends. Thus, Robinson Crusoe has also to face the problem of choice and would surely
come within the purview of Robbins’ definition.
However, most modern economists, like R. G. Lipsey, Paul Samuelson Milton Friedman,
etc., held the view that, economics is not a human but a social science. Thus, economics
should not study the problem of choice faced by a single individual like Robinson Crusoe.
It should instead study the choice problem where it has a social impact, because man lives in
society and an individual often interacts with other members of society.
For example, price controls on Kerosine oil have the desired effect of reducing cooking
expenditures for some consumers, but they also reduce both conservation of Kerosene by
those consumers and the incentive of producers to bring more Kerosene to the market.
Other consumers will therefore be forced to rely more heavily on other more expensive
sources of energy pushing the prices of these energy sources upward. Thus, the controls also
generate an unintended result an increase in the energy costs for some consumers.
If we take a broad view of the subject matter of economics we may say that, Economics is the
study of all phenomena relating to wealth and value. It is one of the social sciences that deal
with economic goods, the creation of wealth through the satisfaction of human wants, the
explanation of wealth, value and price, the distribution of income and the mechanism of
exchange and markets of an economy.
According to Robbins, economics is the study of the problem of using available factors of
production as efficiently as possible so as to attain the maximum fulfillment of society’s
demands for goods and services. The ultimate purpose of economic endeavour is to satisfy
human wants for goods and services.
The problem is that, whereas wants are virtually without limit, the resources—land, labour,
capital and organisation—available at any one time to produce goods and services, are
limited in supply, i.e., resources are scarce relative to the demands for them.
The fact of scarcity means that we must always be making choices. If, to take a simple
example, more resources are devoted to producing motor cars fewer resources are then
available for constructing roads or bridges or setting up schools and hospitals. Thus,
economics is a science of scarcity or is a study of the problems of scarcity.
However, economics does not study the behaviour of human beings in the way other subjects
like Physiology or Psychology study it. Economics is no doubt a Science, but it is not a pure
(exact) science like Physics, Chemistry.
2. Science or Art
For quite a long time there was controversy among economists as to whether it is a science or
an art. The members of the English classical school, such as Adam Smith, T. R. Mathus and
David Ricardo, held the view that it was a pure science whose task was just to explain the
cause of economic phenomena such as unemployment, inflation, slow growth or even trade
deficit.
According to classical writers, economics is simply the study of cause and effect relationship.
However, neo-classical and modern economists have pointed out that economics is both a
science and an art. Just to treat economics as a science is to rob it of its practical value. As
Keynes has commented, “Practical men……. are usually the slaves of some defunct
economist.” So, economics has both a theoretical side and a practical or applied side. In other
words, economics is no doubt a science, but it is both ‘light-bearing and fruit bearing’.
Inflation, unemployment, monopoly, economic growth, pollution, free markets versus central
planning, poverty, productivity and other current issues are all covered in the study of
economics. Economics is a problem- based social science, and the problems with which it is
especially concerned are among the central issues of our times.
3. Positive or Normative
Some later members of the classical school even went to the extent of suggesting that
economists should not give any advice on any issue.
This means that economics should stand neutral as regards ends. However, the same view has
been reaffirmed by Robbins, who commented that the function of the economist is to explore
and explain, not to uphold or to condemn. This simply means that economists should take
ends as given. Their task is just to discover ways and means of achieving these ends (i.e., to
find out ways of accomplishing objectives).
No doubt, by restricting himself to positive aspect of economic science (with its focus on
resource allocation and valuation of commodities and factors) Robbins has narrowed
(restricted) the scope of economics. He denied economics the right to study welfare.
As he has commented, “Whatever economics is concerned with it is not concerned with the
causes of material welfare as such.” He has also ignored macroeconomics altogether as also
the problems of developing countries like India.
So, Robbins’ view of economic science is not only one-sided but misleading, too. The task of
economists is not just to explain why certain things happen (i.e., why there is so much of
unemployment in India in spite of her planned economic development or why there is so
inequality in the distribution of income and wealth notwithstanding the prevalence of the
progressive income tax system).
It is equally vital to pass judgment as to whether certain things are good or bad from society’s
welfare point of view. For example, it is not enough for an economist to explain the present
problem of unequal distribution of income and wealth in India.
4. Problem-solving Nature
The classical economists believed that economics could not solve practical problems, because
there were non-economic (social, political, ethical, religious and other) aspects of people’s
lives.
“The theory of economics does not furnish a body of settled conclusions immediately
applicable to policy. It is a method rather than a doctrine, an apparatus of the mind, a
technique of thinking which helps its possessor to draw correct conclusions.”
Micro Economics
Microeconomics is the social science that studies the implications of human action,
specifically about how those decisions affect the utilization and distribution of scarce
resources. Microeconomics shows how and why different goods have different values, how
individuals make more efficient or more productive decisions, and how individuals best
coordinate and cooperate with one another. Generally speaking, microeconomics is
considered a more complete, advanced, and settled science than macroeconomics.
As a purely normative science, microeconomics does not try to explain what should happen
in a market. Instead, microeconomics only explains what to expect if certain conditions
change. If a manufacturer raises the prices of cars, microeconomics says consumers will tend
to buy fewer than before. If a major copper mine collapses in South America, the price of
copper will tend to increase, because supply is restricted. Microeconomics could help an
investor see why Apple Inc. stock prices might fall if consumers buy fewer iPhones.
Microeconomics could also explain why a higher minimum wage might force The Wendy’s
Company to hire fewer workers. Microeconomics can address questions like these that might
have very broad implications for the economy; however, questions about aggregate economic
numbers remain the purview of macroeconomics, such as what might happen to the gross
domestic product (GDP) of China in 2020.
Method of Microeconomics
The study of microeconomics involves several key concepts, including (but not limited to
to):
This is the study of production — or the process of converting inputs into outputs. Producers
seek to choose the combination of inputs and method of combining them that will minimize
cost in order to maximize their profits.
Production theory and utility theory interact to produce the theory of supply and demand,
which determine prices in a competitive market. In a perfectly competitive market, it
concludes that the price demanded by consumers is the same supplied by producer
producers. That
results in economic equilibrium.
Microeconomists study the many ways that markets can be structured, from perfect
competition to monopolies, and the ways that production and prices will develop in tthese
different types of markets.
KEY TAKEAWAYS
Macro Economics
Macroeconomics is a branch of economics that studies how the aggregate economy behaves.
In macroeconomics, economy-wide phenomena are examined such as inflation, price levels,
rate of economic growth, national income, gross domestic product (GDP), and changes in
unemployment.
Understanding Macroeconomics
There are two sides to the study of economics: macroeconomics and microeconomics. As the
term implies, macroeconomics looks at the overall, big picture scenario of the economy. Put
simply, it focuses on the way the economy performs as a whole, and then analyzes how
different sectors of the economy relate to one another to understand how the economy
functions. This includes looking at variables like unemployment, GDP, and inflation.
Macroeconomists develop models explaining relationships between these factors. Such
macroeconomic models, and the forecasts they produce, are used by government entities to
aid in the construction and evaluation of economic policy, by businesses to set strategy in
domestic and global markets, and by investors to predict and plan for movements in various
asset markets.
Given the enormous scale of government budgets and the impact of economic policy on
consumers and businesses, macroeconomics clearly concerns itself with significant issues.
Properly applied, economic theories can offer illuminating insights on how economies
function and the long-term consequences of particular policies and decisions.
Macroeconomic theory can also help individual businesses and investors make better
decisions through a more thorough understanding of what motivates other parties and how to
best maximize utility and scarce resources.
It is also important to understand the limitations of economic theory. Theories are often
created in a vacuum and lack certain real-world details like taxation, regulation and
transaction costs. The real world is also decidedly complicated and their matters of social
preference and conscience that do not lend themselves to mathematical analysis.
Even with the limits of economic theory, it is important and worthwhile to follow the major
macroeconomic indicators like GDP, inflation and unemployment. The performance of
companies, and by extension their stocks, is significantly influenced by the economic
conditions in which the companies operate and the study of macroeconomic statistics can
help an investor make better decisions and spot turning points.
Managerial economics generally refers to the integration of economic theory with business
practice. Economics provides tools managerial economics applies these tools to the
management of business. In simple terms, managerial economics means the application of
economic theory to the problem of management. Managerial economics may be viewed as
economics applied to problem solving at the level of the firm.
It enables the business executive to assume and analyse things. Every firm tries to get
satisfactory profit even though economics emphasises maximizing of profit. Hence, it
becomes necessary to redesign economic ideas to the practical world. This function is being
done by managerial economics.
In the words of Me Nair and Meriam, “Managerial Economics consists of the use of
economic modes of thought to analyse business situations.”
In the opinion of W.W. Haynes “Managerial Economics is the study of the allocation of
resources available to a firm of other unit of management among the activities of that unit.”
According to Floyd E. Gillis, “Managerial Economics deals almost exclusively with those
business situations that can be quantified and dealt with in a model or at least approximated
quantitatively.”
The above definitions emphasise the interrelationship of economic theory with business
decision making and forward planning.
1. Demand Analysis
It will help management to maintain or strengthen its market position and profit-base.
Demand analysis also identifies a number of other factors influencing the demand for a
product. Demand analysis and forecasting occupies a strategic place in Managerial
Economics.
2. Cost Analysis
Cost estimates arc most useful for management decisions. The different factors that cause
variations in cost estimates should be given due consideration for planning purposes.
There is the clement of uncertainty of cost as other factors influencing cost arc either
uncontrollable or not always known.
If one is able to measure cost it is very important for more sound profit planning, cost control
and often for sound pricing practices.
As price gives income to the firm, it constitutes as the most important field of Managerial
Economics.
The success of a business firm depends very much on the correctness of the price decisions
taken by it.
The various aspects that are dealt under it cover the price determination in various market
forms, pricing policies, pricing method, differential pricing, productive pricing and price
forecasting.
4. Profit Management
The chief purpose of a business firm is to earn the maximum profit. There is always an
element of uncertainty about profits because of variation in costs and revenues.
If knowledge about the future were perfect, profit analysis would have been very easy task.
But in this world of uncertainty expectations are not always realized.
Hence profit planning and its measurement constitute the most difficult area of Managerial
Economics.
Under profit management we study nature and management of profit, profit policies and
techniques of profit planning like Break Even Analysis.
The problems relating to firm’s capital investments are perhaps the most complex and
troublesome.
Capital management implies planning and control of capital expenditure because it involves a
large sum and moreover the problems in disposing the capital assets of arc so complex that
they require considerable time and labour.
The environmental factors influence the working and performance of a business undertaking.
Therefore, the managers will have to consider the environmental factors in the process of
decision-making.
Decisions taken in isolation of environmental factors would prove harmful to the firm.
Therefore, the management must be fully aware of economic environment, particularly those
economic factors which constitute the business climate.
Nevertheless, the management must have an idea of social and political trends. Also the main
factors that affect the business climate are : general trend in national income and consumption
expenditure, general price trends, trading relations with other countries, trends in world
market, economic and business policies of the government, industrial relations etc.
Certain macro-economic theories such as income and employment theory, monetary theory
etc. help in analyzing business climate.
Analysis of monetary policy, fiscal policy, industrial policy, foreign trade policy and other
direct controls also help in forecasting business climate.
Therefore, macro- economic theory and government policies arc also included in the scope of
managerial economics.
7. Allied Disciplines
The concepts that help the management in taking business decision are quantitative in nature.
Therefore, mathematical tools are widely used in determining relationships between
economic variables.
Similarly statistical and accounting principles are used in taking business decision. Therefore,
mathematical tools, statistical technique and accounting principles that are used in analyzing
business problems also come under the scope of Managerial Economics.
Demand is the quantity of a good that consumers are willing and able to purchase at various
prices during a given period of time. The relationship between price and quantity demanded
is also known as the demand curve. Preferences which underlie demand are influenced by
cost, benefit, odds and other variables.
Some of the management experts have defined demand in the following ways:
According to Prof. Benham, “The demand for anything, at a given price is the amount of it
which will be bought per unit of time at the price.”
In the words of Prof Hanson, “By demand is meant, demand at a price, for it is impossible to
conceive of demand not related to price.”
As per Prof Hibdon, “Demand means the various quantities of goods that would be purchased
per time period at different prices in a given market.”
According to Prof Mayers, “The demand for goods is schedule of the amounts that buyers
would be willing to purchase at all possible prices at any one instant of time.”
From the aforementioned definitions, it can be concluded that demand implies a desire
supported by an ability and willingness of an individual to pay for a particular product. If an
individual does not have sufficient resources or purchasing power to buy a particular product,
then his/her desire alone would not be regarded as demand.
For instance, if an individual desires to purchase a resort and does not have adequate amount
of money to purchase the resort, his/her desire is not considered as demand for the resort
Apart from It, if an affluent individual desires to purchase a resort, but does not have
willingness to spend money for purchasing the resort then his/her desire is also not
considered as demand.
Therefore, we can say that effective demand is the desire backed by the purchasing power
and willingness of an individual to pay for a particular product. An effective demand has
three characteristics namely, desire, willingness, and ability of an individual to pay for a
product.
The demand for a product is always defined in reference to three key factors, price, point of
time, and market place. These three factors contribute a major part in understanding the
concept of demand. The omission of any of these factors would make the concept of demand
meaningless and vague.
For example, the statement, “the demand for an ABC product is 200” neither conveys any
meaning, nor does have any use for economic analysis or business decision making. On the
1. Sales Forecasting
The demand is a basis the sales of the production of a firm. Hence, sales forecasting can be
made on the basis of demand. For example, if demand is high, sales will be high and if
demand is low, sales will be low. The firms can make different arrangements to increase or
reduce production or push up sales on the basis of sales forecast.
2. Pricing Decisions
The analysis of demand is the basis of pricing decisions of a firm. If the demand for the
product is high, the firm can charge high price, other things remaining the same. On the
contrary .If the demand is low, the firm cannot high price. The demand analysis also helps the
firm in profit budgeting.
3. Marketing Decisions
The analysis of demand helps a firm to formulate marketing decisions. The demand analysis
analyses and measure the forces that determine demand. The demand can be influenced by
manipulating the factors on which consumers base their demand on attractive packaging.
4. Production decisions
How much a firm can produce depends on its capacity. But how much it should produce
depends on demand. Production is not necessary if their no demand. But continuous
production schedule is necessary if the demand for the production is relatively stable. If the
demand is less than the quantity of production, new demand should be created by means of
promotional activities such a advertising.
5. Financial decisions
The demand condition in the marker for firm’s product’s affects the financial decisions as
well. If the demand for firm’s product is strong and growing, the needs for additional finance
will be greater. Hence, the financial manager should make necessary financial arrangement to
finance the growing need of the capital.
Kinds of Demand:
1. Price demand,
1. Price Demand:
Price demand is that demand which refers to the various quantities of a commodity or service
that a consumer would purchase at a given time in a market at various hypothetical prices. In
this it is always assumed that other things such as consumer’s income, his tastes and prices of
related goods remain unchanged.
It is the aggregate demand of all the consumers combined for the commodity.
This is the total demand for the product of an individual firm at various prices.
2. Income Demand:
This demand refers to the various quantities of goods which will be purchased by the
consumer at various levels of income. In this, we start with this assumption that the price of
the commodity as well as the price of related goods and the tastes and desire of the
consumers do not change. The demand brings out the relationship between income and
quantities demanded. This is helpful in preparing demand schedule.
3. Cross Demand:
In this demand the quantities of goods which will be purchased with reference to changes in
the price not of this goods but of other related goods. These goods are either substitutes or
complementary goods. For example—A change in the price of tea will affect demands for
coffee. Similarly, if the price of horses will become cheap demand for carriages may
increase.
Determinants of Demand
Demand is fluctuating time to time. There are majorly six factors which affect the demand for
a commodity (Product).
2. Prices of related products: an increase in the price of one product will cause a decrease in
the quantity demanded of a complementary product. In contrast, an increase in the price of
one product will cause an increase in the demand for a substitute product.
3. Consumer income: the higher the consumer income, the higher the demand and vice versa.
4. Consumer expectations: expectations for a higher income or higher prices increase the
quantity demanded. Expectations for a lower income or lower prices decrease the quantity
demanded.
5. The number of buyers: the higher the number of buyers, the higher the quantity demanded,
and vice versa.
6. Other factors: the weather and governmental policies that may expand or contract the
economy affect the demand for particular products or services.
Law of Demand
The law of demand is one of the most fundamental concepts in economics. It works with the
law of supply to explain how market economies allocate resources and determine the prices
of goods and services that we observe in everyday transactions. The law of demand states that
quantity purchased varies inversely with price. In other words, the higher the price, the lower
the quantity demanded. This occurs because of diminishing marginal utility. That is,
consumers use the first units of an economic good they purchase to serve their most urgent
needs first, and use each additional unit of the good to serve successively lower valued ends.
The law of demand is a fundamental principle of economics which states that at higher price
consumers will demand a lower quantity of a good.
Economics involves the study of how people use limited means to satisfy unlimited wants.
The law of demand focuses on those unlimited wants. Naturally, people prioritize more
urgent wants and needs over less urgent ones in their economic behavior, and this carries over
into how people choose among the limited means available to them. For any economic good,
the first unit of that good that a consumer gets their hands on will tend to be put to use to
satisfy the most urgent need the consumer has that that good can satisfy.
For example, consider a castaway on a desert island who obtains a six pack of bottled, fresh
water washed up on shore. The first bottle will be used to satisfy the castaway’s most
urgently felt need, most likely drinking water to avoid dying of thirst. The second bottle
might be used for bathing to stave off disease, an urgent but less immediate need. The third
bottle could be used for a less urgent need such as boiling some fish to have a hot meal, and
on down to the last bottle, which the castaway uses for a relatively low priority like watering
a small potted plant to keep him company on the island.
In our example, because each additional bottle of water is used for a successively less highly
valued want or need by our castaway, we can say that the castaway values each additional
bottle less than the one before. Similarly, when consumers purchase goods on the market
each additional unit of any given good or service that they buy will be put to a less valued use
than the one before, so we can say that they value each additional unit less and less. Because
they value each additional unit of the good less, they are willing to pay less for it. So the
more units of a good consumers buy, the less they are willing to pay in terms of the price.
By adding up all the units of a good that consumers are willing to buy at any given price we
can describe a market demand curve, which is always downward-sloping, like the one shown
in the chart below. Each point on the curve (A, B, C) reflects the quantity demanded (Q) at a
given price (P). At point A, for example, the quantity demanded is low (Q1) and the price is
high (P1). At higher prices, consumers demand less of the good, and at lower prices, they
demand more.
The Elasticity of Demand measures the percentage change in quantity demanded for a
percentage change in the price. Simply, the relative change in demand for a commodity as a
result of a relative change in its price is called as the elasticity of demand.
The price elasticity of demand, commonly known as the elasticity of demand refers to the
responsiveness and sensitiveness of demand for a product to the changes in its price. In other
words, the price elasticity of demand is equal to
Numerically,
Where,
ΔQ = Q1 –Q0, ΔP = P1 – P0, Q1= New quantity, Q2= Original quantity, P1 = New price, P0
= Original priceThe following are the main Types of Price Elasticity of Demand:
Income elasticity of demand refers to the sensitivity of the quantity demanded for a certain
good to a change in real income of consumers who buy this good, keeping all other things
constant. The formula for calculating income elasticity of demand is the percent change in
quantity demanded divided by the percent change in income.
Income elasticity of demand measures the responsiveness of demand for a particular good to
changes in consumer income. The higher the income elasticity of demand in absolute terms
for a particular good, the bigger consumers’ response in their purchasing habits — if their
real income changes. Businesses typically evaluate income elasticity of demand for their
products to help predict the impact of a business cycle on product sales.
In the words of Cundiff and Still, “Demand forecasting is an estimate of sales during a
specified future period based on proposed marketing plan and a set of particular
uncontrollable and competitive forces.”
Demand plays a crucial role in the management of every business. It helps an organization to
reduce risks involved in business activities and make important business decisions. Apart
from this, demand forecasting provides an insight into the organization’s capital investment
and expansion decisions.
Implies that every business unit starts with certain pre-decided objectives. Demand
forecasting helps in fulfilling these objectives. An organization estimates the current demand
for its products and services in the market and move forward to achieve the set goals.
For example, an organization has set a target of selling 50, 000 units of its products. In such a
case, the organization would perform demand forecasting for its products. If the demand for
the organization’s products is low, the organization would take corrective actions, so that the
set objective can be achieved.
Plays a crucial role in making budget by estimating costs and expected revenues. For
instance, an organization has forecasted that the demand for its product, which is priced at Rs.
10, would be 10, 00, 00 units. In such a case, the total expected revenue would be 10*
100000 = Rs. 10, 00, 000. In this way, demand forecasting enables organizations to prepare
their budget.
Implies that demand forecasting helps in deciding about the expansion of the business of the
organization. If the expected demand for products is higher, then the organization may plan to
expand further. On the other hand, if the demand for products is expected to fall, the
organization may cut down the investment in the business.
Helps in making critical decisions, such as deciding the plant capacity, determining the
requirement of raw material, and ensuring the availability of labor and capital.
Enables the government to coordinate import and export activities and plan international
trade.
1. New unit or expansion: Long term demand forecasting helps in planning of a new unit or
expansion of an existing unit of a business organization.
2. Financial requirements: It is useful in long term financial planning. Long-term sales
forecast is necessary to estimate long term financial requirements.
3. Man power planning: Long term demand forecasting enables the firm to make arrangements
for training and personnel development. Demand forecasting is also useful to the Government
in determining import and export policies.
There is no easy or simple formula to forecast the demand. Proper judgment along with the
scientific formula is needed to correctly predict the future demand for a product or service.
Some methods of demand forecasting are discussed below:
When the demand needs to be forecasted in the short run, say a year, then the most feasible
method is to ask the customers directly that what are they intending to buy in the forthcoming
Complete Enumeration Method: Under this method, nearly all the potential buyers are asked
about their future purchase plans.
Sample Survey Method: Under this method, a sample of potential buyers is chosen
scientifically and only those chosen are interviewed.
End-use Method: It is especially used for forecasting the demand of the inputs. Under this
method, the final users i.e. the consuming industries and other sectors are identified. The
desirable norms of consumption of the product are fixed, the targeted output levels are
estimated and these norms are applied to forecast the future demand of the inputs.
Hence, it can be said that under this method the burden of demand forecasting is on the
buyer. However, the judgments of the buyers are not completely reliable and so the seller
should take decisions in the light of his judgment also.
The customer may misjudge their demands and may also change their decisions in the future
which in turn may mislead the survey. This method is suitable when goods are supplied in
bulk to industries but not in the case of household customers.
Under this method, the salesperson of a firm predicts the estimated future sales in their
region. The individual estimates are aggregated to calculate the total estimated future sales.
These estimates are reviewed in the light of factors like future changes in the selling price,
product designs, changes in competition, advertisement campaigns, the purchasing power of
the consumers, employment opportunities, population, etc.
The principle underlying this method is that as the salesmen are closest to the consumers they
are more likely to understand the changes in their needs and demands. They can also easily
find out the reasons behind the change in their tastes.
Therefore, a firm having good sales personnel can utilize their experience to predict the
demands. Hence, this method is also known as Salesforce opinion or Grassroots approach
method. However, this method depends on the personal opinions of the sales personnel and is
not purely scientific.
3. Barometric Method
This method is based on the past demands of the product and tries to project the past into the
future. The economic indicators are used to predict the future trends of the business. Based on
the future trends, the demand for the product is forecasted. An index of economic indicators
is formed. There are three types of economic indicators, viz. leading indicators, lagging
indicators, and coincidental indicators.
The leading indicators are those that move up or down ahead of some other series. The
lagging indicators are those that follow a change after some time lag. The coincidental
Another one of the methods of demand forecasting is the market experiment method. Under
this method, the demand is forecasted by conducting market studies and experiments on
consumer behavior under actual but controlled, market conditions.
Certain determinants of demand that can be varied are changed and the experiments are done
keeping other factors constant. However, this method is very expensive and time-consuming.
Usually, the market experts have explicit knowledge about the factors affecting the demand.
Their opinion can help in demand forecasting. The Delphi technique, developed by Olaf
Helmer is one such method.
Under this method, experts are given a series of carefully designed questionnaires and are
asked to forecast the demand. They are also required to give the suitable reasons. The
opinions are shared with the experts to arrive at a conclusion. This is a fast and cheap
technique.
6. Statistical Methods
The statistical method is one of the important methods of demand forecasting. Statistical
methods are scientific, reliable and free from biases. The major statistical methods used for
demand forecasting are:
Trend Projection Method: This method is useful where the organization has sufficient
amount of accumulated past data of the sales. This date is arranged chronologically to obtain
a time series. Thus, the time series depicts the past trend and on the basis of it, the future
market trend can be predicted. It is assumed that the past trend will continue in future. Thus,
on the basis of the predicted future trend, the demand for a product or service is forecasted.
Regression Analysis: This method establishes a relationship between the dependent variable
and the independent variables. In our case, the quantity demanded is the dependent variable
and income, the price of goods, price of related goods, the price of substitute goods, etc. are
independent variables. The regression equation is derived assuming the relationship to be
linear. Regression Equation: Y = a + bX. Where Y is the forecasted demand for a product or
service.
In other words, it is a process in which the inputs are converted into outputs.
The basic proposition of the production concept is that customers will choose products and
services that are widely available and are of low cost. So business is mainly concerned with
making as many units as possible. By concentrating on producing maximum volumes, such a
business aims to maximise profitability by exploiting economies of scale.
Managers try to achieve higher volume with low cost and intensive distribution strategy. This
seems a viable strategy in a developing market where market expansion is the survival
strategy for the business. Companies interested to take the benefit of scale economies pursue
this kind of orientation.
In a production-orientated business, the needs of customers are secondary compared with the
need to increase output. Such an approach is probably most effective when a business
operates in very high growth markets or where the potential for economies of scale is
significant. It is natural that the companies cannot deliver quality products and suffer from
problems arising out of impersonal behavior with the customers.
Do note, the production concept is a thing of the past and was used when there was very less
competition. At such times, the more you produced, the more will be the consumption of the
product. An example in this case is FORD, which manufactured huge number of automobiles
through its manufacturing assembly line which was the first of its kind.
PRODUCTION ANALYSIS
Production analysis basically is concerned with the analysis in which the resources such as
land, labor, and capital are employed to produce a firm’s final product. To produce these
goods the basic inputs are classified into two divisions −
1. Variable Inputs
Inputs those change or are variable in the short run or long run are variable inputs.
2. Fixed Inputs
Inputs that remain constant in the short term are fixed inputs.
In simple words, production function refers to the functional relationship between the
quantity of a good produced (output) and factors of production (inputs).
“The production function is purely a technical relation which connects factor inputs and
output.” Prof. Koutsoyiannis
Defined production function as “the relation between a firm’s physical production (output)
and the material factors of production (inputs).” Prof. Watson
In this way, production function reflects how much output we can expect if we have so much
of labour and so much of capital as well as of labour etc. In other words, we can say that
production function is an indicator of the physical relationship between the inputs and output
of a firm.
The reason behind physical relationship is that money prices do not appear in it. However,
here one thing that becomes most important to quote is that like demand function a
production function is for a definite period.
It shows the flow of inputs resulting into a flow of output during some time. The production
function of a firm depends on the state of technology. With every development in technology
the production function of the firm undergoes a change.
The new production function brought about by developing technology displays same inputs
and more output or the same output with lesser inputs. Sometimes a new production function
of the firm may be adverse as it takes more inputs to produce the same output.
Mathematically, such a basic relationship between inputs and outputs may be expressed as:
Q = f( L, C, N )
L = Labour
C = Capital
N = Land.
Hence, the level of output (Q), depends on the quantities of different inputs (L, C, N)
available to the firm. In the simplest case, where there are only two inputs, labour (L) and
capital (C) and one output (Q), the production function becomes.
Q =f (L, C)
1. Substitutability
The factors of production or inputs are substitutes of one another which make it possible to
vary the total output by changing the quantity of one or a few inputs, while the quantities of
all other inputs are held constant. It is the substitutability of the factors of production that
gives rise to the laws of variable proportions.
2. Complementarily
The factors of production are also complementary to one another, that is, the two or more
inputs are to be used together as nothing will be produced if the quantity of either of the
inputs used in the production process is zero.
3. Specificity
It reveals that the inputs are specific to the production of a particular product. Machines and
equipment’s, specialized workers and raw materials are a few examples of the specificity of
factors of production. The specificity may not be complete as factors may be used for
production of other commodities too. This reveals that in the production process none of the
factors can be ignored and in some cases ignorance to even slightest extent is not possible if
the factors are perfectly specific.
Production involves time; hence, the way the inputs are combined is determined to a large
extent by the time period under consideration. The greater the time period, the greater the
freedom the producer has to vary the quantities of various inputs used in the production
process.
There are different types of production functions that can be classified according to the
degree of substitution of one input by the other.
Cobb-Douglas production function refers to the production function in which one input can
be substituted by other but to a limited extent. For example, capital and labor can be used as a
substitute of each other, but to a limited extent only.
Q = AKaLb
b=1–a
Q = akaL1-a
(i) Makes it possible to change the algebraic form in log linear form, represented as follows:
This production function has been estimated with the help of linear regression analysis.
This production function has been estimated with the help of linear regression analysis.
(iii) Acts as a homogeneous production function, whose degree can be calculated by the value
obtained after adding values of a and b. If the resultant value of a + b is 1, it implies that the
degree of homogeneity is 1 and indicates the constant returns to scale.
(iv) Makes use of parameters a and b, which signifies the elasticity’ coefficients of output for
inputs, labor and capital, respectively. Output elasticity coefficient refers to the change
produced in output due to change in capital while keeping labor at constant.
a and b = constants
For example, tyres and steering wheels are used for producing cars. In such case, the
production function can be as follows:
CES stands for constant elasticity substitution. CES production function shows a constant
change produced in the output due to change in input of production.
Or,
CES has the homogeneity degree of 1 that implies that output would be increased with the
increase in inputs. For example, labor and capital has increased by constant factor m.
Therefore, Q’ = mQ
This implies that CES production function is homogeneous with degree one.
Laws of Production
The laws of production describe the technically possible ways of increasing the level of
production. Output may increase in various ways.
Output can be increased by changing all factors of production. Clearly this is possible only in
the long run. Thus the laws of returns to scale refer to the long-run analysis of production.
In the short run output may be increased by using more of the variable factor(s), while capital
(and possibly other factors as well) are kept constant.
The marginal product of the variable factors) will decline eventually as more and more
quantities of this factor are combined with the other constant factors. The expansion of output
with one factor (at least) constant is described by the law of (eventually) diminishing returns
of the variable factor, which is often referred to as the law of variable proportions.
Laws of Production in economics deals with the concepts of cost and producers equilibrium.
It is an important aspect of economics as it helps a business determine the level of output that
leads to maximum profits. It also defines the various variable and fixed costs of the firm.
(v) Best combination of factors of production has crossed the level of optimum point.
Consider a corn farmer with one acre of land. In addition to land, other factors include
quantity of seeds, fertilizer, water, and labor. Assume the farmer has already decided how
much seed, water, and labor he will be using this season. He is still deciding on how much
fertilizer to use. As he increases the amount of fertilizer, the output of corn will increase. It
may also reach a point where the output actually begins to decrease since too much fertilizer
can become poisonous.
The law of diminishing returns states that there will be a point where the additional output of
corn gained from one additional unit of fertilizer will be smaller than the additional output of
corn from the previous increase in fertilizer. This table shows the output of corn per unit of
fertilizer:
As the farmer increases from one to two units of fertilizer, total output increases from 100 to
250 ears of corn. Therefore the marginal, or additional, ears of corn gained from one more
unit of fertilizer is 150 (250 – 100). From two to three units of fertilizer, the total output
increases from 250 to 425 ears of corn, a 175 marginal increase.
At what point does the law of diminishing returns set in? Look for the point at which the
marginal increase is at the highest point and the next marginal increase is less. In this
example, that occurs after the farmer adds the third unit of fertilizer. At three units, the
marginal output in ears of corn is 175, but when the fourth unit is added, the marginal output
drops to 125.
1. The natural factors have more role than human factors in agricultural sector and marginal
productivity decreases.
2. The sector has very wide area and supervision cannot be very effective.
3. Scope of specialized machinery is limited.
4. There are other limitations
tations of seasonal nature e.g. rain, climate changes etc.
5. The fertility land also declines
The application of this law is not confined to agriculture but it applies everywhere. If the
industry is expanded too much, the supervision will become inefficient and costs will go up.
In agriculture it sets in earlier and in industry much later. Agriculture has also increasing
returns in the beginning.
The law of returns to scale describes the relationship between outputs and scale of inputs in
the long-run
run when all the inputs are increased in the same proportion. In the words of Prof.
Roger Miller, “Returns to scale refer to the relationship between changes in output and
proportionate changes in all factors of production. To meet a lon
long-run
run change in demand, the
firm increases its scale of production by using more space, more machines and labourers in
the factory’.
Assumptions
Explanation
Given these assumptions, when all inputs are increased in unchanged proportions and the
scale of production is expanded, the effect on output shows three stages: increasing returns to
scale, constant returns to scale and diminishing returns to scale.
Returns to scale increase because the increase in total output is more than proportional to the
increase in all inputs.
The table reveals that in the beginning with the scale of production of (1 worker + 2 acres of
land), total output is 8. To increase output when the scale of production is doubled (2 workers
+ 4 acres of land), total returns are more than doubled. They become 17. Now if the scale is
Increasing returns to scale also result from specialization and division of labour. When the
scale of the firm is expanded there is wide scope of specialization and division of labour.
Work can be divided into small tasks and workers can be concentrated to narrower range of
processes. For this, specialised equipment can be installed. Thus with specialization,
efficiency increases and increasing returns to scale follow.
As the firm expands, it enjoys internal economies of production. It may be able to install
better machines, sell its products more easily, borrow money cheaply, procure the services of
more efficient manager and workers, etc. All these economies help in increasing the returns
to scale more than proportionately.
A firm also enjoys increasing returns to scale due to external economies. When the industry
itself expands to meet the increased long-run demand for its product, external economies
appear which are shared by all the firms in the industry.
When a large number of firms are concentrated at one place, skilled labour, credit and
transport facilities are easily available. Subsidiary industries crop up to help the main
industry. Trade journals, research and training centres appear which help in increasing the
productive efficiency of the firms. Thus these external economies are also the cause of
increasing returns to scale.
Returns to scale become constant as the increase in total output is in exact proportion to the
increase in inputs. If the scale of production in increased further, total returns will increase in
such a way that the marginal returns become constant. In the table, for the 4th and 5th units of
(i) Internal Economies and Diseconomies: But increasing returns to scale do not continue
indefinitely. As the firm expands further, internal economies are counterbalanced by internal
diseconomies. Returns increase in the same proportion so that there are constant returns to
scale over a large range of output.
(ii) External Economies and Diseconomies: The returns to scale are constant when external
diseconomies and economies are neutralised and output increases in the same proportion.
(iii) Divisible Factors: When factors of production are perfectly divisible, substitutable, and
homogeneous with perfectly elastic supplies at given prices, returns to scale are constant.
Returns to scale diminish because the increase in output is less than proportional to the
increase in inputs. The table shows that when output is increased from the 6th, 7th and 8th
units, the total returns increase at a lower rate than before so that the marginal returns start
diminishing successively to 10, 9 and 8. In the figure, the portion from D to S of the RS curve
shows diminishing returns.
Constant returns to scale is only a passing phase, for ultimately returns to scale start
diminishing. Indivisible factors may become inefficient and less productive. Business may
become unwieldy and produce problems of supervision and coordination. Large management
creates difficulties of control and rigidities. To these internal diseconomies are added external
diseconomies of scale.
These arise from higher factor prices or from diminishing productivities of the factors. As the
industry continues to expand, the demand for skilled labour, land, capital, etc. rises. There
being perfect competition, intensive bidding raises wages, rent and interest. Prices of raw
materials also go up. Transport and marketing difficulties emerge. All these factors tend to
raise costs and the expansion of the firms leads to diminishing returns to scale so that
doubling the scale would not lead to doubling the output.
For the management increasing, decreasing or constant returns to scale reflect changes in pro-
duction efficiency that result from scaling up productive inputs. But returns to scale is strictly
a production and cost concept. Management’s decision on what to produce and how much to
produce must be based upon the demand for the product. Therefore, demand and other factors
must also be considered in decision making.
i. Organizational Objectives: Affect the pricing decisions to a great extent. The marketers
should set the prices as per the organizational goals. For instance, an organization has set a
goal to produce quality products, thus, the prices will be set according to the quality of
products. Similarly, if the organization has a goal to increase sales by 18% every year, then
the reasonable prices have to be set to increase the demand of the product.
ii. Costs: Influence the price setting decisions of an organization. The organization may sell
products at prices less than that of the competitors even if it is incurring high costs. By
following this strategy, the organization can increase sales volumes in the short run but
cannot survive in the long run.Thus, the marketers analyze the costs before setting the prices
to minimize losses. Costs include cost of raw materials, selling and distribution overheads,
cost of advertisement and sales promotion and office and administration overheads.
iii. Legal and Regulatory Issues: Persuade marketers to change price decisions. The legal
and regulatory laws set prices on various products, such as insurance and dairy items. These
laws may lead to the fixing, freezing, or controlling of prices at minimum or maximum
levels.
iv. Product Characteristics: Include the nature of the product, substitutes of the product,
stage of life-cycle of the product, and product diversification.
v. Competition: Affects prices significantly. The organization matches the prices with the
competitors and adjusts the prices more or less than the competitors. The organization also
assesses that how the competitors respond to changes in the prices.
b. Products that have more than elastic demand will be priced low
viii. Competitor’s pricing Policies: Influence the pricing policies of the organizations. The
price of a product should be determined in such a way that it should easily face price
competition.
ix. Distribution Channels: Implies a pathway through which the final products of
manufacturers reach the end users. If the distribution channel is large, price of the product
will be high and if the distribution channel is short, the price of the product will be low. Thus,
these are the major factors that influence the pricing decisions.
Price determination is one of the most crucial aspects in economics. Business managers are
expected to make perfect decisions based on their knowledge and judgment. Since every
economic activity in the market is measured as per price, it is important to know the concepts
and theories related to pricing. Pricing discusses the rationale and assumptions behind pricing
decisions. It analyzes unique market needs and discusses how business managers reach upon
final pricing decisions.
It explains the equilibrium of a firm and is the interaction of the demand faced by the firm
and its supply curve. The equilibrium condition differs under perfect competition, monopoly,
monopolistic competition, and oligopoly. Time element is of great relevance in the theory of
pricing since one of the two determinants of price, namely supply depends on the time
allowed to it for adjustment.
Market Structure
A market is the area where buyers and sellers contact each other and exchange goods and
services. Market structure is said to be the characteristics of the market. Market structures are
basically the number of firms in the market that produce identical goods and services. Market
structure influences the behavior of firms to a great extent. The market structure affects the
supply of different commodities in the market.
When the competition is high there is a high supply of commodity as different companies try
to dominate the markets and it also creates barriers to entry for the companies that intend to
Perfect Competition
Perfect competition is a situation prevailing in a market in which buyers and sellers are so
numerous and well informed that all elements of monopoly are absent and the market price of
a commodity is beyond the control of individual buyers and sellers
With many firms and a homogeneous product under perfect competition no individual firm is
in a position to influence the price of the product that means price elasticity of demand for a
single firm will be infinite.
Pricing Decisions
Market price is determined by the equilibrium between demand and supply in a market period
or very short run. The market period is a period in which the maximum that can be supplied
is limited by the existing stock. The market period is so short that more cannot be produced in
response to increased demand. The firms can sell only what they have already produced. This
market period may be an hour, a day or a few days or even a few weeks depending upon the
nature of the product.
In the case of perishable commodity like fish, the supply is limited by the available quantity
on that day. It cannot be stored for the next market period and therefore the whole of it must
be sold away on the same day whatever the price may be.
In case of non-perishable but reproducible goods, some of the goods can be preserved or kept
back from the market and carried over to the next market period. There will then be two
critical price levels.
The first, if price is very high the seller will be prepared to sell the whole stock. The second
level is set by a low price at which the seller would not sell any amount in the present market
period, but will hold back the whole stock for some better time. The price below which the
seller will refuse to sell is called the Reserve Price.
Monopolistic Competition
Each firm is therefore the sole producer of a particular brand or “product”. It is monopolist as
far as a particular brand is concerned. However, since the various brands are close substitutes,
a large number of “monopoly” producers of these brands are involved in a keen competition
with one another. This type of market structure, where there is competition among a large
number of “monopolists” is called monopolistic competition.
There are large number of independent sellers and buyers in the market.
The relative market shares of all sellers are insignificant and more or less equal. That is,
seller-concentration in the market is almost non-existent.
There are neither any legal nor any economic barriers against the entry of new firms into the
market. New firms are free to enter the market and existing firms are free to leave the market.
In other words, product differentiation is the only characteristic that distinguishes
monopolistic competition from perfect competition.
Monopoly
Monopoly is said to exist when one firm is the sole producer or seller of a product which has
no close substitutes. According to this definition, there must be a single producer or seller of
a product. If there are many producers producing a product, either perfect competition or
monopolistic competition will prevail depending upon whether the product is homogeneous
or differentiated.
On the other hand, when there are few producers, oligopoly is said to exist. A second
condition which is essential for a firm to be called monopolist is that no close substitutes for
the product of that firm should be available.
From above it follows that for the monopoly to exist, following things are essential −
One and only one firm produces and sells a particular commodity or a service.
There are no rivals or direct competitors of the firm.
No other seller can enter the market for whatever reasons legal, technical, or economic.
Monopolist is a price maker. He tries to take the best of whatever demand and cost conditions
exist without the fear of new firms entering to compete away his profits.
Since all of the firms sell the identical product, the individual sellers are not distinctive.
Buyers care solely about finding the seller with the lowest price.
In this context of “perfect competition”, all firms sell at an identical price that is equal to their
marginal costs and no individual firm possess any market power. If any firm were to raise its
price slightly above the market-determined price, it would lose all of its customers and if a
firm were to reduce its price slightly below the market price, it would be swamped with
customers who switch from the other firms.
Oligopoly
In an oligopolistic market there are small number of firms so that sellers are conscious of
their interdependence. The competition is not perfect, yet the rivalry among firms is high.
Given that there are large number of possible reactions of competitors, the behavior of firms
may assume various forms. Thus there are various models of oligopolistic behavior, each
based on different reactions patterns of rivals.
Oligopoly is a situation in which only a few firms are competing in the market for a particular
commodity. The distinguishing characteristics of oligopoly are such that neither the theory of
monopolistic competition nor the theory of monopoly can explain the behavior of an
oligopolistic firm.
Under oligopoly the number of competing firms being small, each firm controls an important
proportion of the total supply. Consequently, the effect of a change in the price or output of
one firm upon the sales of its rival firms is noticeable and not insignificant. When any firm
takes an action its rivals will in all probability react to it. The behavior of oligopolistic firms
is interdependent and not independent or atomistic as is the case under perfect or
monopolistic competition.
Under oligopoly new entry is difficult. It is neither free nor barred. Hence the condition of
entry becomes an important factor determining the price or output decisions of oligopolistic
firms and preventing or limiting entry of an important objective.
Skimming strategy: high price is charged for a product till such time as competitors allow
after which prices can be dropped. The idea is to recover maximum money before the product
or segment attracts more competitors who will lower profits for all concerned. Example: the
earliest prices for mobile phones, VCRs and other electronic items where a few players ruled
attracted lower cost Asian players.
Profit simply means a positive gain generated from business operations or investment after
subtracting all expenses or costs.
(ii) Profits may be negative, whereas returns, such as wages and interest are always positive
Functions of Profit
Profit is the primary objective of all business organizations. The expectation of earning
higher profits of business organizations induces them to invest money in new ventures. This
results in large employment opportunities in the economy which further raises the level of
income. Consequently, there is a rise in the demand for goods and services in the economy.
In this way, profit generated by business organizations play a significant role in the economy.
According to Peter Ducker, there are three main purposes of profit, which are explained as
follows:
Refers to the fact that profit generated by an organization helps in estimating the
effectiveness of its business efforts. If the profits earned by an organization are high, it
indicates the efficient management of its business. However, profit is not the most efficient
measure of estimating the business efficiency of an organization, but is useful to measure the
general efficiency of the organization.
Helps organizations to cover various costs, such as replacement costs, technical costs, and
costs related to other risks and uncertainties. An organization needs to earn sufficient profit to
cover its various costs and survive in the business.
Apart from aforementioned functions, following are the positive results of high profits:
Leads to better technology and dynamic efficiency. An organization invests in research and
development activities for its further expansion, if it earns high profit. The organization
would lose its competitiveness, if it does not invest in research and development activities.
Includes dividends for shareholders. If an organization earns high profits, it would provide
high dividends to shareholders. As a result, the organization would attract more investors,
which are crucial for the growth of the organization.
Implies that profits are helpful for economies. If organizations generate high profits, they
would be able to cope with adverse economic situations, such as recession and inflation. This
results in stability of economies even in adverse situations.
Implies that if the profits generated by organizations are high, they are liable for paying high
taxes. This helps government to earn high revenue and spend for social welfare.
1. Walker’s Theory
An American economist, Prof F. A. Walker propounded the theory of profit, known as rent
theory of profit. According to him “as rent is the difference between least and most fertile
land similarly, profit is the difference between earnings of the least and most efficient
entrepreneurs.” He advocated that profit is the rent of exceptional abilities that an
entrepreneur possesses over others.
According to Walker; profit is the difference between the earnings of the least and most
efficient entrepreneurs. An entrepreneur with the least efficiency generally strives to cover
only the cost of production. On the other hand, an efficient entrepreneur is rewarded with
profit for his differential ability.
Thus, profit is also said to be the reward for differential ability of the entrepreneur. While
formulating this theory, Walker assumed the condition of perfect competition in which all
organizations are supposed to have equal managerial ability. In this case, there is no pure
profit and all the organizations earn only managerial wages known as normal profit.
The rent theory was mainly criticized for its inability to explain the real nature of profits.
Provides only a measure of profit. The theory does not focus on the nature of profit, which is
of utmost importance.
Assumes that profits arise because of the superior or exceptional ability of the entrepreneur,
which is not always true. Profit can also be the result of the monopolistic position of the
entrepreneur.
Clark’s dynamic theory was introduced by an American economist, J.B. Clark. According to
him, profit does not arise in a static economy, but arise in a dynamic economy. A static
economy is characterized as the one where the size of population, the amount of capital,
nature of human wants, the methods of production remain the same and there is no risk and
uncertainty. Therefore, according to Clark, only normal profits are earned in the static
economy. However, an economy is always dynamic in nature that changes from time to time.
There are internal and external factors that make the world dynamic. The internal changes are
changes that take place within the organization, such as layoff and hiring of employees,
product changes, and changes in infrastructure. The external changes are of two kinds,
namely, regular changes and irregular changes.
The risk theory of profit was given by F. B. Hawley in 1893. According to Hawley, “profit is
the reward of risk taking in a business. During the conduct of any business activity, all other
factors of production i.e. land, labor, capital have guaranteed incomes from the entrepreneur.
They are least concerned whether the entrepreneur makes the profit or undergoes losses.”
Hawley refers profit as a reward for taking risk. According to him, the greater the risk, the
higher is the expected profit. The risks arise in the business due to various reasons, such as
non-availability of crucial raw materials, introduction of better substitutes by competitors,
obsolescence of a technology, fall in the market prices, and natural and manmade disasters.
Risks in businesses are inevitable and cannot be predicted. According to Hawley, an
entrepreneur is rewarded for undertaking risks.
There is a criticism against this theory that profits arise not because risks are borne, but
because the superior entrepreneurs are able to reduce them. The profits arise only because of
better management and supervision by entrepreneurs. Another criticism is that profits are
never in the proportion to the risk undertaken. Profits may be more in enterprises with low
risks and less in enterprises with high risks.
4. Knight’s Theory
The calculable risks can be insured. On the other hand, non-calculable risks are those risks
that cannot be accurately calculated and insured such as shifts in demand of a product. These
non-calculable risks are uncertain, while calculable risks are certain and can be anticipated.
According to Knight, “risks are foreseen in nature and can be insured”. Thus, risk taking is
not a function of an entrepreneur, but of insurance organizations. Therefore, an entrepreneur
gets profit as a reward for bearing uncertainties and not for risks that are borne by insurance
organizations.
Joseph Schumpeter propounded a theory called innovation according to which profits are the
reward for innovation He advocated that innovation is the introduction of a new product, new
technology, new method of production, and new sources of raw materials. This helps in
lowering the cost of production or improving the quality of production. Innovation also
includes new policy or measure by an entrepreneur for an organization.
In general, innovation can take place in two ways, which are as follows:
Reducing the cost of production and earning high profit. The cost of production can be
reduced by introducing new machines and improving production techniques.
Stimulating the demand by enhancing the existing improvement or finding new markets.
According to innovation theory, profit is the cause and effect of innovations. In other words,
it acts as a necessary incentive for making innovation.
In the neo-classical theory of the firm, the main objective of a business firm is profit
maximization. The firm maximizes its profits when it satisfies the two rules. MC = MR and
the MC curve cuts the MR curve from below Maximum profits refer to pure profits which are
a surplus above the average cost of production.
It is the amount left with the entrepreneur after he has made payments to all factors of
production, including his wages of management. In other words, it is a residual income over
and above his normal profits.
Maximize p (Q)
Assumptions:
1. The objective of the firm is to maximize its profits where profits are the difference between
the firm’s revenue and costs.
2. The entrepreneur is the sole owner of the firm.
3. Tastes and habits of consumers are given and constant.
4. Techniques of production are given.
5. The firm produces a single, perfectly divisible and standardized commodity.
6. The firm has complete knowledge about the amount of output which can be sold at each
price.
7. The firm’s own demand and costs are known with certainty.
8. New firms can enter the industry only in the long run. Entry of firms in the short run is not
possible.
9. The firm maximizes its profits over some time-horizon.
10. Profits are maximized both in the short run and the long run.
Given these assumptions, the profit maximizing model of the firm can be shown under
perfect competition and monopoly.
Under perfect competition, the firm is one among a large number of producers. It cannot
influence the market price of the product. It is the price-taker and quantity-adjuster. It can
only decide about the output to be sold at the market price.
The firm is, thus, in equilibrium when MC = MR = AR (Price). The equilibrium of the profit
maximization firm under perfect competition is shown in Figure 1. Where the MC curve cuts
the MR curve first at point A.
It satisfies the condition of MC = MR, but it is not a point of maximum profits because after
point A, the MC curve is below the MR curve. It does not pay the firm to produce the
minimum output when it can earn larger profits by producing beyond OM.
There being one seller of the product under monopoly, the monopoly firm is the industry
itself. Therefore, the demand curve for its product is downward sloping to the right, given the
tastes and incomes of its customers. It is a price-maker which can set the price to its
maximum advantage. But it does not mean that the firm can set both price and output. It can
do either of the two things.
If the firm selects its output level, its price is determined by the market demand for its
product. Or, if it sets the price for its product, its output is determined by what consumers will
take at that price. In any situation, the ultimate aim of the monopoly firm is to maximize its
profits. The conditions for equilibrium of the monopoly firm are (1) MC = MR< AR (Price),
and (2) the MC curve cuts the MR curve from below.
The profit maximization theory has been severely criticised by economists on the
following grounds:
1. Profits uncertain
The principle of profit maximization assumes that firms are certain about the levels of their
maximum profits. But profits are most uncertain for they accrue from the difference between
the receipt of revenues and incurring of costs in the future. It is, therefore, not possible for
firms to maximize their profits under conditions of uncertainty.
This objective of the firm bears little or no direct relevance to the internal organisation of
firms. For instance, some managers incur expenditures apparently in excess of those that
would maximize wealth or profits of the owners of the firm. Managers of corporations are
observed to emphasize growth of total assets of the firm and its sales as objectives of
managerial actions.
Also managers of firms undertake cost reducing, efficiency increasing campaigns when
demand falls.
3. No perfect knowledge
The profit maximization hypothesis is based on the assumption that all firms have perfect
knowledge not only about their own costs and revenues but also of other firms. But, in
At the most they may have knowledge about their own costs of production, but they can
never be definite about the market demand curve. They always operate under conditions of
uncertainty and the profit maximization theory is weak in that it assumes that firms are
certain about everything.
The empirical evidence on profit maximization is vague. Most firms do not rank profits as the
major goal. The working of modem firms is so complex that they do not think merely about
profit maximization. Their main problems are of control and management.
The function of managing these firms is performed by managers and shareholders rather than
by the entrepreneurs. They are more interested in their emoluments and dividends
respectively. Since there is substantial separation of ownership from control in modern firms,
they are not operated so as to maximize profits.
It is asserted that the real world firms do not bother about the calculation of marginal revenue
and marginal cost. Most of them are not even aware of the two terms. Others do not know the
demand and marginal revenue curves faced by them.
Still others do not possess adequate information about their cost structure. Empirical evidence
by Hall and Hitch shows that businessman have not heard of marginal cost and marginal
revenue. After all, they are not greedy calculating machines.
Hall and Hitch found that firms do not apply the rule of equality of MC and MR to maximize
short run profits. Rather, they aim at the maximization of profits in the long run. For this,
they do not apply the marginalistic rule but they fix their prices on the average cost principle.
According to this principle, price equals AVC+AFC+ profit margin (usually 10%). Thus the
main aim of the profit maximizing firm is to set a price on the average cost principle and sell
its output at that price.
7. Static Theory
The neo-classical theory of the firm is static in nature. The theory does not tell the duration of
either the short period or the long period. The time-horizon of the neo-classical firm consists
of identical and independent time-periods. Decisions are considered as independent of the
time-period.
This is a serious weakness of the profit maximization theory. In fact, decisions are
‘temporally interdependent’. It means that decisions in any one period are affected by
NGBDU, DEPT OF MGT 57 | P a g e
decisions in past periods which will, in turn, influence the future decisions of the firm. This
interdependence has been ignored by the neo-classical theory of the firm.
As a matter of fact, the profit maximization objective has been retained for the perfectly
competitive, or monopolistic, or monopolistic competitive firm in economic theory. But it has
been abandoned in the case of the oligopoly firm because of the criticisms levelled against it.
Hence the different objectives that have been put forth by economists in the theory of the firm
relate to the oligopoly or duopoly firm.
9. Varied Objectives
The basis of the difference between the objectives of the neo-classical firm and the modern
corporation arises from the fact that the profit maximization objective relates to the
entrepreneurial behaviour while modern corporations are motivated by different objectives
because of the separate roles of shareholders and managers. In the latter, shareholders have
practically no influence over the actions of the managers.
As early as in 1932, Berle and Means suggested that managers have different goals from
shareholders. They are not interested in profit maximization. They manage firms in their own
interests rather than in the interests of shareholders. Thus modern firms are motivated by
objectives relating to sales maximization, output maximization, utility maximization,
satisfaction maximization and growth maximization.