Developing A Continuous Improvement Culture - 220905 - 155942
Developing A Continuous Improvement Culture - 220905 - 155942
A Management
g Perspective
p
What is CI?
So that CI becomes
“that’s the way we do it here”
What are the benefits of CI?
• Typically 25 to 30 good suggestions per employee, per year, and to
have over 90% of those implemented
implemented. (Toyota had 75
75,000
000
suggestions from 7,000 employees and 99% were implemented).
• Small improvements
p add upp to major
j benefits - improved
p
productivity, improved quality, better safety, faster delivery, lower
costs, and greater customer satisfaction.
• Employees
E l fi
find
d work
k tto b
be easier
i and
d more enjoyable
j bl - resulting
lti iin
higher employee moral and job satisfaction, and lower turn-over.
• CI reduces waste in areas such as inventory
inventory, waiting times
times,
transportation, worker motion, employee skills, over production,
excess quality and in processes.
• CI improves space utilisation, product quality, use of capital,
communications, production capacity and employee retention.
The winning formula
Q
E=QxA
A
Effectiveness = Quality of problem solving skills x cultural Acceptance
E=QxA
I think and
solve problems
I don’t think or
solve problems
Operator/weak partner
Problem solving tools
Kaizen/Lean Six-Sigma
• People/Team based • Structured data centric
structured modules problem solving
• Elimination of waste methodology
• Elimination of variation
D efine the exact focus of the improvement project
WORLD CLASS M easure current performance against agreed targets
CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT A nalyse the data to find the causes of variation
PROBLEM SOLVING TOOLS
I mprove the process to fix the causes of variation
ORKFLOW
ANGES TO
CAPACITY
ALWAYS AVAILABLE
RIGHT FIRST TIME
OW
WORK FLO
ONTINUOUS WO
TOOL CHA
INCREASE M/C C
EVERY TIME Q
SMED
D
TQM
TPM
QUICK
CO
WORKPLACE ORGANISATION
ELIMINATION OF WASTE
Waste Elimination WASTE
Operation 55555
Delay Why??
Wh
Why?
Inspection Why?
Storage Why?
Transportation Why?
Man Method
1 2 3 4 5 Material Machine
5 Core
C Modules
M d l P bl
Problem Solving
S l i Tools
T l
Workplace Organisation
ST
RA
5S Housekeeping and
d respect them
h
IG
RT
HT
SO
EN
Standard Ops.
25
18
Samedi
2
11
1
24
31
4
17
10
30
Vendredi
23
16
9
Jeudi
29
2
15
22
Mercredi
28
1
21
14
Mardi
27
13
20
Visual Controls
6
Lundi
26
19
12
Dimanche
5
YES NO 5
Skill M
Monitoring
it i SUSTAIN
1
2
4
Pro
Pro
Pro
P1 P2 P3 P4
ST
SI DA
AN
M R
3
4 IFY ISE
PL D
P
EE
SIMPLIFY
SW
1
50
ONE
recipe
Visual
recipes
Example : Skills matrix
documented
Controls
ELECTRO MECHANICAL SPECIALISTS
Mat'l Tie
Work Station #'S 4101 4102 4104 4105 4106 4107 4108 4109 4116 4116 4118 4111
4103
Handling Wrap
Form # Form # Form # Form #
Work Description Stuff
Channel
Stuff
Top
Shelf
20 GA
Harness
14,16,
18 GA
Harness
18/20
Harness
18 GA
Asb.
Harness
PC
Brd
Harness
Heavy
Wire
Paint
Silk-
Screen
Pack
Out
Tap Licenced
50 results Quality the XXXX XXZZ YYXX ZZXY
Dorothy H.
((deviations)) first time
Ellen B.
( variation)
(no i ti )
Pat M.
LeRoy W.
Steve H.
Bill B.
Standard Ops. MAX
MIN
Lawrence D.
Diane M.
Rhea F.
Glenda M.
Legend :
2
Zeit pro Tag
Taktzeit =
Abrufe pro Tag
Kanban Signal
g
To request a new
delivery
KANBAN
SMED - Quick Tool Changeovers
Set-up is:
400
S ingle
M inute
200
E xchange of
100 D ies, tools
& fixtures
10
3
External
E t l
Before External
Before
Internal Internal
External
External After
After
Total Quality Management / Six-sigma
δ∑x WARNING Indicates an error situation
requiring intervention
Error Proofingg Ppk CONTROL
Cost of Quality Stops production
MSA – GR&R
Cpk Prevents mistakes
Regression 12
Design of 120 V
1.5 A
Experiments
H
Hypothesis
th i
ANOVA
4
DOE % of
MIN MIN MAX MAXAVG MEAN AMLC L AMUC L AVG RNG AVG S D SDS TDEV S DLC L S DUC L LOW
HARDNESS
HI SCALE
Turnover Failure
678 975 832 740 924 81 30.6 13.3 -9.3 70.6 670 N/A HV10
950
FREQ
Failure
850 900
Hardn e ss HV
UCL 825
Appraisal
650
550
AVG MEAN
MEAN
675
600
525
Appraisal
450 450
Prevention
1
13
17
21
25
29
33
37
41
45
49
53
57
61
65
69
73
77
0 5 10 15 20 25
FREQ
Prevention
80.0
95
Hard ne ss HV
60.0
UCL 80
LCL 65
40.0
AVG SD 50
STDEV
20.0 35
20
0.0 5
13
17
21
25
29
33
37
41
45
49
53
57
61
65
69
73
77
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
Total Preventative Maintenance
Effectiveness / INSPECTION TAG
TPM No.:
Capability
Date of Inspection Department Team Inspector
Description of Malfunction
Predictive
Preventative
Planned Date Person Responsible Planned Action verified by:
of Action Completion Date
Preventive maintenance
Predictive
maintenance
Autonomous
maintenance
Reactive
maintenance time
Simplify Access...
adjustments
F
9Reduced
Numerous
bolts
Hinges Pear holes Grooves
E
speed
Handles Windows
TPM = elimination of waste + continuous improvement
Tools - Problem Solving Tools
60 100 % 55555
40
80 Why?
60
20 40 Why?
0 20 Why?
A B C D E F
Why?
Pareto 80%/20% Why?
Value stream mapping
5 Why Root Cause
FOR AGAINST
Start
process
Input Operation
Decision
No
Yes
Operation
Decision
No Yes
Operation Output End 8D
Operation Operation Operation
Force field
Delay Man Method
Inspection
Storage
Transportation Material Machine
//// /// ?
Process mapping Fishbone Tally Chart Brainstorm
E=QxA
M
Manager/strong
/t partner
t
I think and
solve problems
I don’t think or
solve problems
Learned helplessness
Operator/weak partner & low esteem
I think and
solve problems
I don’t think or
solve problems
Learned helplessness
Operator/weak partner & low esteem
Resistance Exploration
2. Resistance 3. Exploratory
• Anger Internal/Self • Begin to
• Anxiety acceptt the
th
• Fear inevitability
• Verbal reaction • Negotiation
• Looking for
benefits
Traditional Method vs Kaizen
The traditional
method
An ANALYSIS COMMITTEE
The KAIZEN
makes
RECOMMENDATIONS
method
MANAGERS A MULTIDISPLINARY TEAM
take the
DECISIONS analyses the situation,
An IMPLEMENTATION takes the decisions,
COMMITTEE takes actions and
implements
CHANGES implements the changes
The EMPLOYEES Weeks
ADAPT and A FEW DAYS
to changes months
Fire Fighting vs CI
Fi Fighting
Fire Fi hti Spiral
S i l C ti
Continuous IImprovementt SSpiral
i l
Focus on
present Focus on future
The Route to CI
People are not the problem. Blaming them will not solve the
problem. The answer is to make people
p p p problem
p solvers!
4. Launch the Initiative
• Not big bang and fizzle out!
• Start small and build
– Training
– appoint a coordinator
– start with one initiative
– see it through!
• Publicise initiatives
– announcements
– display boards KAïZEN Processes:
•Body text
Convert
Some Pitfalls
• The supportive sceptic - lip service only
• B prepared
Be d tto unblock
bl k th
the llog-jam
j
• Managers get too involved
• Not setting tough but achievable targets
• Underestimating resources/effort required to finish
i iti ti
initiatives - 80/20 rulel
• Not making it someone's job to ‘make it happen’
• I’m
I’ ttoo bbusy spiral
i l
Many Problems,
waste, rework
Few
Improvement Fire fighting
efforts
Focus on
present
Next Steps
Achieve Continuous
I
Improvement t