Informal Food Markets - 2023
Informal Food Markets - 2023
APRIL
2023
Informal Food Markets in Quezon City
and Pasay City, Philippines: A Rapid
Assessment
APRIL
2023
Informal Food Markets in Quezon City and Pasay City, Philippines: A Rapid Assessment
ISBN: 978-92-9060-664-2
DOI: 10.4160/9789290606642
Resilient Cities Through Sustainable Urban and Peri-urban Agrifood Systems (known as Resilient Cities) is a new
research for development Initiative of the One CGIAR which aims to support a vibrant, largely informal urban and
peri-urban agrifood sector, to help improve sustainability, equity and opportunity growth , and to mitigate risks to
human and environmental health. During its first phase, the Initiative is primarily working in cities of Bangladesh,
Ethiopia, Ghana, Kenya, Peru and the Philippines. Resilient Cities is being implemented by five CGIAR Centers – CIP
(lead), IFPRI, IITA, IRRI, IWMI – as well as R&D partners World Vegetable Center and RUAF.
The reports and publications generated through the Initiative contribute important development information to
the public arena. Readers are encouraged to quote or reproduce material from them in their own publications. As
copyright holder CIP/Resilient Cities requests acknowledgement and a copy of the publication where the citation
or material appears.
Correct citation:
Roa, Julieta, 2023. Informal Food Markets in Quezon City and Pasay City, Philippines: A Rapid Assessment. Resilient
Cities Initiative Research Report. Lima: Peru. International Potato Center.
April 2023
Resilient Cities and CIP thank all donors and organizations that globally support their work through contributions
to the CGIAR: www.cgiar.org/funders.
This publication is copyrighted by the International Potato Center (CIP) and Resilient Cities Initia-
tive. It is licensed for use under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Contents
Acknowledgment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . v
Acronyms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . vi
Abstract . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
Objectives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
Methodology, context, and scope . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
Related literature . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
The informal food market sector and food security . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
Resilience and urbanization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
Results and discussion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
The pilot cities: a briefer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
The market system . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
Primary markets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
Secondary markets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
Talipapa or satellite markets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
The vegetable industry: a backgrounder . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
Demand for vegetables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
Vegetable supply . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
The NCR agri-food system and the informal sector . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
The informal food vendors in the pilot sites . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
Informal vegetable vendors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
The street food vendors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33
Capacity development and learning needs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38
Governance of informal food markets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39
Pasay City . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40
Quezon City . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40
The informal food sector: insights for ways forward . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42
Key emerging issues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42
Common local government responses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43
Proposed alternative strategies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44
Conclusions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46
References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47
Annexes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
Annex 1. Field work activity schedule . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
Annex 2. Key informant interview guide for informal food vendors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55
Annex 3. Common street food sold in study sites . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59
Tables
Table 1. Metro Manila population, area, density, and year incorporated . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
Table 2. Summary characteristics of pilot cities (Quezon City and Pasay City) . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
Table 3. Top 10 ranking of highly urbanized cities (HUCs), 2021 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
Table 4. Annual per capita consumption of food commodities in the Philippines . . . . . . . . 22
Table 5. Vegetable production in different zones in the Philippines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
Table 6. Vegetables traded in wholesale and retail markets (English, common and . . . . . . . 22
scientific names) and main supply areas
Table 7. Urban and peri-urban farms and gardens, markets and uses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
Table 8. Profile of the informal vegetable vendors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
Table 9. Business information about informal vendors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
Figures
Figure 1. Philippine map showing the location of NCR. Inset: Map of NCR showing . . . . . . . 10
the location of Quezon City and Pasay City
Figure 2. Location map of Metro Manila cities, including Quezon and Pasay cities, . . . . . . . . 14
and the main bagsakan markets
Figure 3. Vegetable supply chains in Metro Manila . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
The study on the informal food markets has been positively received by relevant
agencies and city governments approached for the rapid assessment of the informal
food vendors in the focused sites – Pasay and Quezon City. We sincerely appreciate
the strong support particularly of the offices of the mayors of Pasay and Quezon City
through the facilitation and interviews with the Chief of Staff Mr. Peter Eric D. Pardo and
team, Pasay City; Mr. Emmanuel Hugh Velasco II and team of Sustainable Development
Affairs Unit, Quezon City; the active participation of Mr. Roger Tamondong, supervisor
of the Edukasyong Pantahanan at Pangkabuhayan (EPP) of the Department of Education;
Mr. Glenn Panganiban, chair of National Urban and Peri-urban Agriculture Program
(NUPAP)—Bureau of Plant Industry and director of High Value Commercial Crops, and
Mr. Ramon Niedra of the Agriculture Marketing Assistance Support of the Department of
Agriculture with their respective staff. Also, great appreciation for the zeal and hospitality
of the focal officials of the community and school gardens—Mr. Wally Canque of Holy
Spirit Community Garden; Mr. Silverio Estorco, principal of San Diego Elementary School;
Mr. Jun Ogot, principal of Commonwealth High School; and Mr. Geoffrey Echanis of old
Balara Elementary School.
Special thanks to the former director of the Agriculture Training Institute, Department
of Agriculture, Dr. Rosana Mula and staff in the facilitation and provision of venue for
the focus group discussion with key officials of the NUPAP, and support staff for the key
informant interviews: Mr. Jomar Tabor, Ms. Janina Villafuerte, Mr. Justin Paolo Interno and
Ms. Lyka Mercader. Most importantly to scores of vendors and officials in Padre Rada-
Divisoria, Pasay and Quezon City markets who shared valuable time and information
during the market visits.
On the whole, this should not have been possible without the assistance of Ms. Arma
Bertuso, Resilient Cities Focal Person (Philippines), for the overall facilitation and active
participation in interviewing; the guidance of Dr. Gordon Prain, Resilient Cities Senior
Advisor, for providing detailed comments and suggestions for revising an earlier version
of the report; and the joint leadership to the Initiative provided by Dr. Simon Heck and
Dr. Silvia Alonso.
T
assistance. Yet, it increasingly plays a
he One CGIAR Initiative on significant role in the urban economy in
“Resilient Cities through terms of livelihood, employment, food
Sustainable Urban and Peri- provision, and potential contribution to
Urban Agrifood Systems” aims the resiliency and sustainability of cities.
to strengthen evidence and The urban food economy is affected by
capacities for improving management a range of activities from farm to table.
of urban food systems in Africa, Asia, Taking the urban informal food sector as a
and Latin America through access to take-off point toward establishing resilient
technology, skills, and information to cities requires that it be viewed from an
improve diets and livelihoods of a fast- agrifood system perspective. It needs
growing global urban populace while to be understood within the context of
reducing environmental footprints. urbanization and the related issues of
Securing a productive, healthy population unemployment, poverty, food insecurity,
in resiliently green urban spaces has congested settlements and whether
become a global priority. The science- cities are able to prepare and recover
based resilient cities initiative has for future shocks (e.g., economic, social,
identified five key entry immediate action institutional, environmental). The informal
points: more efficient and safer urban/ market sector, because of its enormous
peri-urban food production, improved economic importance in cities of the
urban food markets and supply chains, Global South, needs to be included in
innovative circular bio-economy, improved public sector planning, policymaking, and
urban food environments for healthier program design (ILO 2018, UN 2021, Tefft
urban diets, and support of research and et al. 2017): that is, informal markets are
innovative capacity development systems. ubiquitous but exist beyond the purview
of public sector policy and action.
In the Philippines, the research focus of
the Initiative in the first year is on efficient Like in most countries in Asia, the rate of
and safe food production and inclusive urbanization in the Philippines is expected
profitable informal markets, both with to increase over the next 20 years (UN-
Metro Manila as the focus area. The current Habitat 2022). Metro Manila is classified
report addresses the issue of improving as 100% urban, even though there are
the efficiency of the marketing side of agricultural areas in the fringes. The rest
the urban agrifood system. The informal of the country’s population is expected
food market, which is a large part of the to be 60% urban within the decade (PSA
urban informal economy, is the priority 2020). But the economic growth and
sector being addressed with the end goal dynamism of Metro Manila have not been
of improving urban food systems through effectively translated into health and well-
capacity development that will strengthen being. The existing food system in Metro
enterprise skills and ensure access to Manila may be described as dysfunctional.
technologies, information, and business People suffer from a “triple burden” of
support services, thus, improving the food malnutrition. About 33% of children
supply and diets of the urban populace under 5 are stunted, 30% of adults over
while reducing environmental footprints 20 are overweight or obese, and 20%
in the urban food system. of children below 5 are suffering from
Vitamin A deficiency or “hidden hunger”.
Moreover, about 67% of households do
The iconic view of vibrant city streets
not meet their calorie requirement (FNRI
and markets presents scores of ambulant
2017, 2018). The farmers and fisher folk
vendors of food, wares, and crafts,
who feed Metro Manila are suffering, are
along with agricultural produce such
getting old (average age, 58), and are not
as fruits and vegetables—the informal
being replaced as the young generation
market sector, unregistered and outside
Valenzuela
Quezon City
Navotas Malabon
Caloocan
(South)
Metro Manila,
Philippines
Manila San Juan
Mandaluyong
Pasig
Makati
Pasay Pateros
City
Taguig
Parañaque
Las Piñas
Muntinlupa
Note: Metro Manila is officially the National Capital Region (NCR) composed of 16 highly
urbanized cities and one municipality.
Figure 1. of leafy greens developed around the Human Settlement Model of Community
Philippine map area. Small- and medium-scale businesses Award (for Bistekville 2, given during the
showing the dominate the economy, mostly in 2018 Annual Session of Global Forum on
location of NCR.
Inset: Map of
wholesale and retail of finished products Human Settlement (GFHS), October 30,
NCR showing and in the provision of basic services. 2018, United Nations Conference Center
the location of This city leads in pursuing innovative in Bangkok, Thailand; for integrated
Quezon City and development programs that earned it a approach to socialized housing among
Pasay City. number of awards in the recent decade. informal settlers, with disaster risk
including the Gender and Development mitigation and improvement of quality
(GAD) Local Learning Hubs (LLH, 2019) for of life); Best Local Disaster Risk Reduction
its social hygiene and sundown clinics, and and Management Council (DRRMC),
the Quezon City Protection Center; Global Philippines 2018; Most Competitive City,
The Balintawak Cloverleaf market is located The secondary markets surveyed in Pasay
on the border of Quezon City and Caloocan City include Libertad, the city public
City and is mainly accessed by nearby market, and Cartimar and Wowee, which
secondary and satellite markets, especially are both private. They are all less than
those of the Quezon city markets. It is a a kilometer away from each other and
complex of 11 different markets of wet and are very near transport routes at the
dry goods along Epifanio de los Santos heart of the city. The Pasay City public
Avenue (EDSA). Agricultural products from sector also has a role in the 12 private
areas north and south of Metro Manila are markets scattered around the city. It
delivered in volumes, driving prices low. oversees registration/licensing, health and
The schedules and night market activities sanitation, garbage collection, and price
practiced in Balintawak are the same as monitoring (Figure 2).
those in Divisoria.
Secondary markets are open and usually
The Balintawak Cloverleaf market and have a dominant position in sales of
Mega-Q Mart are major trading areas staple goods, fresh fruits and vegetables,
along EDSA. Goods are distributed to and fresh and frozen meat and fish. Both
secondary wholesale/retail outlets in vendors and officials explain this appeal:
eight public markets, 29 private markets, urban consumers are able to access
and 31 talipapa in Quezon City (Figure 2). the freshest produce without needing
a b
Satellite Market
A vegetable Vendors
vendor in manning well-
Primero de Mayo structured
private market in stands that
Libertad, Pasay lined along
with makeshift the vegetable
stalls along the section of the
road selling Pasay City public
commonly used market.
vegetables like
leafy greens,
chayote, carrot,
bitter gourd, taro
and string beans.
Vendor in Primero de
Mayo private market
in Libertad, Pasay
City along the inner
road makeshift stall;
slicing and cutting
vegetables ready
mix for popular local
Vendor in a private dishes life pinakbet
market in Libertad, (i.e. eggplant,
Pasay City, selling squash) and for
a variety of limited chopsuey (carrots,
selection of species cabbage). These are
and vegetables in a usually vegetables
cart along the main left over for non-
road of the market. premium or irregular
sizes but Food
Informal still fresh
Markets in Quezon City
and Pasayfor thePhilippines:
City, day. A Rapid Assessment 17
refrigeration. These markets are near that come mostly from Cavite, Laguna,
homes or offices, offer lower prices, and Batangas, Nueva Ecija, and Mindoro. This
have greater variety than modern retail was established in 1997 as an outgrowth
stores. They also provide customers of the White House Market in Barangay
the opportunity to taste and inspect 93 that now has become a major market
unpackaged fresh produce, enhancing for fruits, bananas, and plantain. Most
consumer trust. These advantages often informal vegetable vendors in the Libertad
outweigh issues of congestion, poor public market and in the nearby talipapa
hygiene, lack of product presentation, or Primero de Mayo get the green vegetables
stressful shopping experience. from Wowee between 12:00 and 3:00 am.
At times when traders bring vegetables
The Libertad public market occupies about straight from the Cordillera to Wowee,
13,378 sq m (ca 1.34 ha) with 1500 stall vendors buy from there at cheaper prices.
holders. It has a market administration
office that works 8 hours, and a market Cartimar is a private market with only
operations office with 24/7 working about 500 sq m of wet market area
time. A market inspector mans the selling vegetables, fruits, fish and aquatic
administration office on weekdays with products, meat, and eggs from local
staff. The operations office has two shifts, and imported sources; the latter coming
morning and evening. The market has from Taiwan, China, Japan, South Korea,
a water supply for general cleaning and and other Asian countries. It serves the
stall use, toilets for male and female, middle to upper income classes as the
and a waste management system in goods sold here are of better quality,
place. All these facilities need further many of imported content, with clear
improvement. Waste and garbage are quality grading and packaging. Prices
collected by the city truck collector and are relatively higher but reasonable
unloaded to a sorting area at a corner of compared with those of similar goods in
the market where the waste is separated high-end supermarkets. Vegetable and
into organic and inorganic. Organic waste fruit stalls are similarly proportioned,
is treated to reduce odor in preparation about 30-40 sq m, with refrigeration as
for processing in a bio-reactor facility two necessary, digital weighing scales, and
blocks away from the market. Processing orderly merchandising in flat, boxed, or
includes mixing with sawdust and charcoal fitting containers, with enough lighting.
dust, shredding, and settling to produce There are collapsible hard screens around
a soil amendment that is available, the store for evening protection. The
free of charge, for the city’s barangay wet market is maintained whole day by
urban gardening initiatives, which grow staff cleaning the floors regularly on the
vegetables and ornamentals (Graham hour. Display areas are tiled and water is
2022). adequate for cleaning the tops. Fish and
meat displays are orderly and classified by
Overall market operations are run by meat cut or product type. Overall, sellers
about 80 staff, including office and and staff are courteous and customer-
maintenance staff, guards, utility workers, oriented. Toilet facilities are within
and laborers. The public market building everyone’s reach. It operates from 2:00
has barracks with kitchen facilities on the am (when vegetables and other goods
2nd floor that serve as accommodations for traded wholesale are made ready for
market staff. volume delivery) and closes at about 1:00
pm. Cartimar is, in fact, a popular market
The Wowee market is a relatively small for both wet and dry goods. No informal
private market (ca 600 sq m) just about vendors are found around this facility.
500 m away from Libertad public market.
Here, a night bagsakan market operates The secondary markets surveyed
from 6:00 to 12:00 pm only for vegetables in Quezon City include the
Commodity/ Commodity/
Selected Selected
average per capita Per capita (kg) average Per capita (kg)
regions regions
(kg/year) per capita (kgyear)
of vegetables for consumption was the years. Vegetable salad bars have become
usual practice, according to 71–98% important offerings in many restaurants.
of households nationwide; 15–21% of Provision of adequate food also means
households consumed their own-produced adequate nutrition, especially for the
bottle gourd (upo), stringbeans, eggplant, rapidly increasing urban population,
and okra. Zamboanga Peninsula had which is projected at 64% (UNFPA 2008),
the biggest percentages of households thereby putting pressure on a mainly rural
consuming own-produced vegetables: source of food.
60% for upo, 67% for stringbeans, 70%
for eggplant, and 78% for okra. Across Vegetable supply
regions, NCR had the highest proportion of
households that bought all the agricultural The main drive of vegetable production
food they consumed, while Zamboanga is to supply the markets of Metro Manila
Peninsula reported a big proportion of (NCR) and other cities, provinces, and
households eating their own produce. NCR municipalities linked with trading
consumers are wholly dependent on bought channels. Since 1978, vegetable per
food (PSA 2017a). capita availability has declined by
23%, to just over a quarter of the WHO
Consumer consciousness about health recommendation for consumption of
and nutrition matters has grown in recent fruits and vegetables. Most of the decline
Supermarkets, specialty food shops, and Long supply chains (green arrows) usually
e-commerce spur shopping innovation refer to vegetables from the Cordillera
of modern supply chains that cater to highlands ( Table 6):
Figure 3.
Vegetable supply
chains in Metro Producers Trader/wholesalers Trader/wholesalers Consumers
Manila retailers/ processors
Wholesalers urban
Consolidator night market
/trader “bagsakan”
Divisoria-Padre
Rada; Balintawak;
other night
olidator/trad markets
Vegetable Wholesale
er
producers packing Households
facilities Institutional
buyers
Wholesale/retail Processors
secondary markets
Supermarkets/
food chains/
hotels &
Long supply chain restaurants
Short supply chain
Vegetable
processors
disturbances, in addition to low yields in end of the third or fourth tier of the
some areas. Vegetables are easily affected distribution chain already bear the bigger
as they are perishable and tend to have brunt of increased prices. Not surprisingly,
increased wastage during extreme buyers complain of high prices and cut
weather events both at the production down on purchases−the common woes of
and distribution nodes of the chain. vendors (Table 11).
Traders usually hedge to avoid such losses
and costs and fix selling at relatively The stakeholders (e.g., LGUs, DA, DTI,
higher prices, while buying from farmers private sector, TESDA, DOH, NGOs) across
at relatively low farm gate prices. The the vegetable supply chain include a
informal vendors who are at the receiving mix of public and private agencies that
Poor physical
Supply disruptions from
Poor condition of physical infrastructure, especially High prices of vegetables
weather/ climate
infrastructure, buildings, in vegetable sections caused low profit
disturbances that
roads/drainage systems of Commonwealth and margins;
resulted in high prices
Wowee markets Perishability, high wastage
esp in bad weather
High perishability & Lack of utilities, eg. water (rains, hot season)
Secluded location of some Hygiene and sanitation
wastage esp with for vegetable washing, Consumers who go to the
markets leading to low needs improvement,
weather disturbance or market cleaning, waste secondary and satellite
vendor sales lack of water facility;
oversupply management markets are used to the
Protocols for food safety
market practices; not
In Libertad, informal practices needed;
Lack of hygiene and too aware of their need
Conversion of land into vendors are not Vendors clamor for market
sanitary facilities and for safe foods.
non-agricultural uses protected during heavy information service;
protocols
rains complain of demanding
Lack of market information customer
Vendors complain of high
system Lacks capital
prices; high wastage
Logistics, increased costs Cleanliness & orderliness due to perishability
Opportunities
Capacity of informal vendors can be enhanced through
LGUs and private market operators can be encouraged Consumer consciousness
awareness activties and implementation of good
to partner for initiative in market development on safe and nutritious
vendor practices (GVP) through the CGIAR-CIP WP2
planning to address needed improvement from food can be improved
project – the Vendor Business School.
physical infrastructure to waste management; through LGU-partners
Business support services for the identified needs can be
facilitated by the CGIAR-CIP WP2 project. work
clarified, arranged, and facilitated for access.
Stakeholders
LGUs, traders’ LGUs, private market LGUs, private market LGUs, private market
DOH, NGOs, consumers’
organizations, DA, operators, DTI, DA/ operators, DA/ KADIWA, operators, DOH, TESDA,
groups
baarangays KADIWA DTI, TESDA barangays
Table 13. Average prices (PhP/kg) and margins (%) of common vegetables contributing to bigger share of sales
and income.
Pasay City Commonwealth, QC Kamuning, QC
Selected vegetable Buying Selling Buying Selling Buying Selling
Margin Margin Margin
price price price price price price
Onions 40 60 50 55 100 82 90 110 22
Tomato 40 60 50 20 30 50 35 45 28
Garlic 95 110 16 – – – 80 90 12
Ginger 55 70 28 45 60 33 35 55 57
Potato 60 80 33 35 45 28 50 60 20
Cabbage 55 75 36 20 30 50 – – –
Pechay (Baguio) 80 100 25 30 45 50 20 30 50
Pechay (native) – – 60 80 33 40 60 50
Pechay, Chinese – – 70 110 – – –
Chayote 55 70 27 – – 20 30 50
Eggplant 80 100 25 20 60 40 60 50
Okra 35 65 86 10 20 60 70 33
Ampalaya 80 100 25 15 30 50 70 40
Baguio beans – – 45 60 – – –
Carrots 75 90 20 65 80 90 100 11
Lettuce – – – 35 70
Squash – – – 30 50 50 70 40
Alugbati – – – 25 40 – – –
Kangkong/ bdl 70 100 43 65 80 – – –
Saluyot 40 60 50 30 50 – – –
Malunggay – – – 60 70 – –
Kinchay/big bdl – – – 500 600 – –
Ampalaya leaves/bdl – – – 120 200 – –
Table 14. Types of street food sold in Pasay and Quezon City.
The egg-based street food have gained
nationwide popularity like the boiled
Pasay City Commonwealth, QC Kamuning, QC
fertilized egg (balut or penoy), and the
Barbecue: pork, chicken
Kwek-kwek, tokneneng Kwek-kwek fried boiled chicken (tokneneng) and quail
and chicken parts, offal
(kwek-kwek) eggs coated with flour-egg
Fried chicken with rice Pares with variants; siomai
Beef pares with rice, mix. Energy boosters like lugaw/arroz
mami
Hot dogs, longganisa,
caldo (rice porridge with chicken, siomai,
Pares with rice, mami Burger chicharon) or goto and mami noodles are
other cold cuts
Home-processed meat Balut and penoy Fish/squid ball, kikiam main meals by themselves. Homemade
Banana cue, turon, Cuchinta, palitaw, processed traditional meat products such
lumpiang togue, cassava, puto, egg pie,
carioca nilupak as longganisa, tocino, and embutido are
‘Dirty ice cream’, shake, fried and goes well with rice as meal.
Cuchinta, palitaw, puto
palamig
Shake, palamig
Peanuts (boiled and fried, Industrial processed food. These are
shelled), chicharon
processed meat formulated by food
*English translation/description of local street foods: kwek-kwek, tokneneng – fried quail/chicken manufacturers that are frozen or vacuum-
egg coated with flour-egg mix; siomai – steamed wrapped ground meat (pork/shrimp) formed
into small balls; pares – braised beef stew; mami – noodle soup; longganisa (seasoned sausage); packed and purchased from supermarkets
balut and penoy – boiled fertilized duck’s egg (14 & 18 days’ old); kikiam – industrial product fish or grocery retail stores. These include
flavored; turon –fried wrapped caramelized banana; lumpiang togue – fried wrapped mungbean
sprouts with ground pork; banana cue – deep-fried banana pieces; carioca, cuchinta, palitaw, the fish and squid balls, siomai, kikiam,
puto nilupak – different rice or rootcrop-based native delicacies, often with coconut; palamig –
flavored cooler drinks; chicharon – crispy fried fatty pork cuts.
and tempura; hotdog and cold cuts, and
Report writing
Note: Includes Activities 1, 2 and 3 of deliverables. A report was submitted for Activity 1. Current report is the deliverable for Activities 2 and 3; but includes the whole of
rapid assessment of informal food vendors, including the highlights of Activity 1.
52
Name: _________________ Market location: _____________________ Type: _________________________
Any
What can you say about the volume of
classification of
Sources (check who Volume/ week (kg); Buying price traded veggies/eggs (specific) last year?
Selling price (PhP/kg) veggies/eggs,
from & supply area) variations in seasonality (Php/ kg) Before pandemic by how much? What
and differences
Year could be the reason?
in price?
Vegetables/ started
eggs selling a. trader/W Volume now is: H, higher ( )
b. trader/R Peak Grades and L, Lower ( )
Lean mo. Peak mo. Lean mo. Lean Peak
c. grower/farmer mo. prices Than last year; before pandemic. Pls
d. grower-trader give reason(s)
• Which of the veggies currently sold have the biggest contribution to sales income? Any variations in sales? If so,
why? Which veggies/eggs can be improved in quantify of sales, pricing? How? (e.g. quality, packaging, variety
selection, etc.)
• Which among the veggies/eggs have shown increasing demand now? in the future? Why?
• Which among the veggies/eggs have shown decreasing demand now? in the future? Why?
• What would you like to be doing differently next year? in 3 years’ time?
• How has the pandemic affected your selling? Did you get support?
• Are you willing to work with others to improve veggie vending/marketing? How do you think can this be done?
What is your possible role?
• Do you have other household income sources? How big is the contribution of your vending veggies/eggs?
• Are there other household members helping? In which work do they help? (supply contact, preparation for
selling, selling, etc.). Is help regular, occasional, seasonal, etc.?
• How did you get your vending location? Arrangement type? Local requirements? What is the status? How is this
secured?
Income:
Per veggie quantity & price
Net income:
Guide A is the interview guide for vendors/sellers. Guide B is used for street food vendors (i.e. banana cue,
bbq of chicken parts, port meat, chorizo, etc.) while Guide C is done with related supplier to the vendor, who
can be a local grower/gardener/farmer (urban, peri-urban).
Observation/thumbnail sketch
[Write down briefly observation on the physical facilities/infrastructure around the selling area; any is-
sues, events that are relevant to selling. Also, briefly describe the circumstances or conditions during the
interview; including disturbances around the environment affecting the interview].
56
Name: ________________________ Location: _____________________________________
• Which of the street food currently sold have the biggest contribution to sales income? Any variations in sales?
If so, why? Which can be improved in quantify of sales, pricing? How? (e.g. quality, packaging, variety selection
etc.)
• Which among the street food have shown increasing demand now? in the future? Why?
• Which among the street food have shown decreasing demand now? in the future? Why?
• What would you like to be doing differently next year? in 3 years’ time?
• How has the pandemic affected your selling? Did you get support?
• Are you willing to work with others to improve street food vending? How do you think can this be done? What
is your possible role?
• Do you have other household income sources? How big is the contribution of your vending street food?
• Are there other household members helping? In which work do they help? (supply contact, preparation for
selling, selling etc). Is help regular, occasional, seasonal, etc.?
• How did you get your vending location? Arrangement type? Local requirements? What is the status? How is this
secured?
Income:
Per veggie; quantity & price
Net income:
A. Meat-based
c
1. Barbecue: grilled pork and
chicken meat, and chicken parts d
a b
CGIAR is a global research partnership for a food-secure future, dedicated to transforming food, land, and water systems
in a climate crisis.
www.cgiar.org
The International Potato Center (CIP) was founded in 1971 as a research-for-development organization with a focus on
potato, sweetpotato and Andean roots and tubers. It delivers innovative science-based solutions to enhance access to
affordable nutritious food, foster inclusive sustainable business and employment growth, and drive the climate resilience
of root and tuber agri-food systems. Headquartered in Lima, Peru, CIP has a research presence in more than 20 countries
in Africa, Asia and Latin America.
www.cipotato.org
For more information, please contact CIP Headquarter. Av. La Molina 1895, La Molina. Apartado 1558, Lima 12, Peru.
5-11-3496017 cip-cpad@cgiar.org www.cipotato.org @cipotato @Cipotato @cip_cipotato