132 R. Santos et al.

/ Automation in Construction 80 (2017) 118–136

Table 11
BIM and Spatial Information category.

Category and sub-categories 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Total %

BIM and Spatial Information 0 0 1 0 0 3 2 3 2 2 13 3,4%

4.8. Category: BIM and Spatial Information building, its surroundings and the lifted object in real time using sensors
and a BIM model. Not only was this system tested on a construction site
BIM and Spatial Information (Table 11) is the category that has the for 71 days, it was also a great support for tower crane operators during
fewest papers in this literature review. Generally speaking, this category blind lifts. Other studies have been conducted by Jeong and Ban [205]
has remained constant over time, with BIM-GIS integration being the and Langenhan et al. [206], who employed graph theory in order to rec-
first subject to be studied. It was only later that the Space Syntax field ognise the extracted information from semantic BIMs and measure spa-
began to attract greater research interest. However, the total number tial configurations based on Space Syntax theory. However, for these
of papers published in this category (13) reveals a lack of interest on approaches to be implemented optimally, IFC models must be well
the part of academia. Nevertheless, the use of BIM with GIS and Space designed.
Syntax can offer great advantages in urban planning and construction
operations with low levels of visibility, representing opportunities for 5. Conclusions
future developments in this field. Researchers are starting to notice
GIS's potential in early stages of BIM projects or in renovation projects, As seen in Section 3, BIM research has consistently grown in recent
as it provides detailed geographical information of the asset location years, with more than 90% of the papers being published in the last
considering as well its surroundings, which could have an influence in five years of the period under review, meaning that the last five years
a building's performance (e.g. shading analysis). The sub-categories were particularly productive in terms of BIM research publications. Fur-
identified were based around two major subjects: (i) Geographical In- thermore, we have observed that early published papers were much
formation System (GIS); and (ii) Space Syntax. simpler and more general (conceptual) than the current published pa-
pers, which are very specific and focused on the application of new
methods and tools (using case study methodology). Despite the higher
4.8.1. Sub-category: Geographical Information System (GIS)
number of published papers in the last years, the quality and complexity
The first field to be explored in this category by researchers was the
of recent papers are substantially high, meaning that BIM field is
integration of BIM with Geographical Information System (GIS), with
reaching advanced levels of maturity.
authors using BIM-GIS for a range of purposes. For instance, Isikdag et al.
Based on the bibliometric analysis and categorisation process, it was
[199] assessed the implementation of an IFC-based BIM model in
observed is that even though Collaborative Environments and Interop-
geospatial context with a view to improving the fire response opera-
erability is the category with the most papers published, it was the
tions and site location of a project, making use of the high level of geo-
BIM adoption and standardisation category that had the most cited arti-
metric and semantic data of BIM models. With a different focus,
cles (28%), being followed by BIM Programming (16%) and Image Pro-
Elbeltagi and Dawood [200] developed a BIM-GIS-based visualisation
cessing, Laser Scanning and Augmented Reality (14%). In regard to
system to monitor construction performance, enabling nD visualisation
sub-categories, the articles that scholars cited the most covered the
of the construction progress by incorporating as-built site photographs.
study of BIM adoption, development of tools, application of laser scan-
A similar approach was used by Bansal [201], which used a 4D GIS for
ning technology and reviews on BIM literature. Regarding the most
space planning. In his study, Bansal argued that BIM tools still faces con-
cited scientific journals, Automation in Construction was the journal
siderable challenges as geospatial analysis modelling of topography,
with the highest number of published articles on the top 100 most
and believed that more work must be done in order to effectively inte-
cited, with a total of 59 articles.
grate BIM with GIS. However, more recent studies seemed to solved
After we carefully analysed the content of the 381 articles and
some challenges. In 2013, Irizarry et al. [202] used BIM-GIS integration
categorised them, the BIM categories that had the highest number of
in an original way, allowing designers to visualise the materials' supply
published papers were: (i) Collaborative Environments and Interopera-
chain by using a plug-in developed in Revit. In this study, the BIM model
bility; (ii) Sustainable Construction; (iii) BIM adoption and
generates the quantity take-off, identifying which materials will be nec-
standardisation; (iv) and BIM Programming. Accordingly, these four
essary in the construction site. Then the tool exports that information
categories can be considered the main BIM research trends, with the
into a GIS module which will pinpoint the location of nearby suppliers
Collaborative Environments and Interoperability having the highest
and then estimate the cost and duration of the construction. As a result,
growth rate in the last year, mainly pushed by studies on Semantic
BIM-GIS integration not only identifies the optimal solution for logistic
BIM and Ontology. However, “Facilities Management and Safety Analy-
costs but also detect the motive for materials delays. However, accord-
sis” and “Image Processing, Laser Scanning and Augmented Reality” can
ing to the authors, BIM-GIS integration still have some semantic inter-
also be considered hot topics in BIM literature, as most of the papers on
operability issues. Later, Mignard and Nicolle [203] proposed a new
these areas were published in the last three years of the studied period.
approach called SIGA3D, built on the ACTIVe3D platform developed in
Our analysis of existing BIM literature revealed that the subjects that
[137], integrating BIM with GIS for urban facility management. This ap-
can be considered as new trends or as having potential are: the develop-
proach led to the creation of an Urban Information Model (UIM), which
ment of BIM-based tools; Semantic BIM & Ontology; Rule Checking &
allowed for the modelling of information on a city on a platform for
Standards; Laser Scanning technologies; Schedule Management; Safety
urban facility management, SIGA3D.
Management; Energy Performance; and Sustainable Performance. De-
spite the considerable amount of literature on BIM tools development
4.8.2. Sub-category: Space Syntax (39), researchers are expected to continue to explore new synergies
The other sub-category that we identified is Space Syntax, a domain with BIM, as BIM-based tools will always be required to automate
that makes use of spatial configurations to predict movement patterns most of the processes. Also, Interoperability & IFC will continue to be
and human behaviour. In this domain, Lee et al. [204] developed a studied in the near future, as the interoperability and potential of new
tower crane navigation system that provides 3D information on a software/tools will need to be carefully assessed. Another topic that
 R. Santos et al. / Automation in Construction 80 (2017) 118–136 133

incorporates the knowledge in tool development and interoperability is [24] J. Teizer, Status quo and open challenges in vision-based sensing and tracking of
temporary resources on infrastructure construction sites, Adv. Eng. Inform. 29
the study on semantics and ontology, which only in the last year result- (2) (2015) 225–238, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2015.03.006.
ed in 10 published papers, being the sub-category that had the highest [25] K. Chen, W.S. Lu, Y. Peng, S. Rowlinson, G.Q. Huang, Bridging BIM and building:
growth rate. from a literature review to an integrated conceptual framework, Int. J. Proj.
Manag. 33 (6) (2015) 1405–1416, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.03.
However, a number of gaps were identified in BIM literature as well, 006.
namely: analysis and comparison of international/national BIM stan- [26] K. Negendahl, Building performance simulation in the early design stage: an intro-
dards; assessment of BIM adoption over Europe; and BIM training and duction to integrated dynamic models, Autom. Constr. 54 (2015) 39–53, http://dx.
doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2015.03.002.
education papers that focus on BIM implementation at the academic [27] M. Yalcinkaya, V. Singh, Patterns and trends in building information modeling
level. Also, fields such as BIM-GIS, space syntax, and quantity take-off (BIM) research: a latent semantic analysis, Autom. Constr. 59 (2015) 68–80,
are not receiving much attention from researchers. Nevertheless, we be- http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2015.07.012.
[28] V. Patraucean, I. Armeni, M. Nahangi, J.M. Yeung, I. Brilakis, C. Haas, State of re-
lieve that BIM-GIS integration can offer new opportunities in urban
search in automatic as-built modelling, Adv. Eng. Inform. 29 (2) (2015) 162–171,
planning and construction operations with low visibility. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2015.01.001.
[29] W.C. Shou, J. Wang, X.Y. Wang, H.Y. Chong, A comparative review of building infor-
mation modelling implementation in building and infrastructure industries, Arch.
References Comput. Methods Eng. 22 (2) (2015) 291–308, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/
s11831-014-9125-9.
[1] European Commission, The European Construction Sector: A Global [30] Y.K. Cho, Y. Ham, M. Golpavar-Fard, 3D as-is building energy modeling and diag-
PartnerAvailable from: http://ec.europa.eu/DocsRoom/documents/15866/attach- nostics: a review of the state-of-the-art, Adv. Eng. Inform. 29 (2) (2015)
ments/1/translations/en/renditions/native 2016. 184–195, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2015.03.004.
[2] European Commission, Construction in EUAvailable from: http://ec.europa.eu/ [31] M.J. Skibniewski, Information technology applications in construction safety assur-
growth/sectors/construction/index_en.htm 2016 (cited 2016 June). ance, J. Civ. Eng. Manag. 20 (6) (2014) 778–794, http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/
[3] L.F. Cabeza, L. Rincón, V. Vilariño, G. Pérez, A. Castell, Life cycle assessment (LCA) 13923730.2014.987693.
and life cycle energy analysis (LCEA) of buildings and the building sector: a review, [32] J. Yang, M.-W. Park, P.A. Vela, M. Golparvar-Fard, Construction performance mon-
Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 29 (0) (2014) 394–416, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. itoring via still images, time-lapse photos, and video streams: now, tomorrow, and
rser.2013.08.037. the future, Adv. Eng. Inform. 29 (2) (2015) 211–224, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.
[4] G.A. van Nederveen, F.P. Tolman, Modelling multiple views on buildings, Autom. aei.2015.01.011.
Constr. 1 (3) (1992) 215–224, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0926-5805(92)90014-B. [33] C.F. Fu, G. Aouad, A. Lee, A. Mashall-Ponting, S. Wu, IFC model viewer to support nD
[5] J. Hoekstra, Big buzz for BIM — is the latest approach to A/E/C software a revolu- model application, Autom. Constr. 15 (2) (2006) 178–185, http://dx.doi.org/10.
tionary one or just repackaged technology at a higher price? Architecture 92 (7) 1016/j.autcon.2005.04.002.
(2003) 79–81. [34] G. Lee, R. Sacks, C.M. Eastman, Specifying parametric building object behavior
[6] C.C. Sullivan, Brace for BIM — the arrival of building information modeling seems (BOB) for a building information modeling system, Autom. Constr. 15 (6) (2006)
inevitable. Are US architects ready for a revolution? Architecture 94 (4) (2005) 758–776, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2005.09.009.
77–78. [35] J. Cohen, A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales, Educ. Psychol. Meas. 20 (1)
[7] K. Sanders, Why building information modeling isn't working…yet, Archit. Rec. (1960) 37–46, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/001316446002000104.
192 (9) (2004) 181–182. [36] R. Sacks, I. Kaner, C.M. Eastman, Y.-S. Jeong, The Rosewood experiment — building
[8] ISO/DIS 29481-1 2014, Building Information Models – Information Delivery Manu- information modeling and interoperability for architectural precast facades,
al – Part 1: Methodology and Formated. ISO 2014. Autom. Constr. 19 (4) (2010) 419–432, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2009.
[9] A. Grilo, R. Jardim-Goncalves, Value proposition on interoperability of BIM and col- 11.012.
laborative working environments, Autom. Constr. 19 (5) (2010) 522–530, http:// [37] L. Ma, R. Sacks, R. Zeibak-Shini, Information modeling of earthquake-damaged re-
dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2009.11.003. inforced concrete structures, Adv. Eng. Inform. 29 (3) (2015) 396–407, http://dx.
[10] S.-L. Fan, M.J. Skibniewski, T.W. Hung, Effects of building information modeling doi.org/10.1016/j.ael.2015.01.007.
during construction, J. Appl. Sci. Eng. 17 (2) (2014) 157–166, http://dx.doi.org/ [38] M. Venugopal, C.M. Eastman, R. Sacks, J. Teizer, Semantics of model views for infor-
10.6180/jase.2014.17.2.06. mation exchanges using the industry foundation class schema, Adv. Eng. Inform.
[11] S.-L. Fan, Intellectual property rights in building information modeling application 26 (2) (2012) 411–428, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2012.01.005.
in Taiwan, J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 140 (3) (2014)http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/ [39] J. Steel, R. Drogemuller, B. Toth, Model interoperability in building information
(asce)co.1943-7862.0000808. modelling, Softw. Syst. Model. 11 (1) (2012) 99–109, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/
[12] P.E.D. Love, D.J. Edwards, S. Han, Y.M. Goh, Design error reduction: toward the ef- s10270-010-0178-4.
fective utilization of building information modeling, Res. Eng. Des. 22 (3) (2011) [40] Y.S. Jeong, C.M. Eastman, R. Sacks, I. Kaner, Benchmark tests for BIM data ex-
173–187, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00163-011-0105-x. changes of precast concrete, Autom. Constr. 18 (4) (2009) 469–484, http://dx.
[13] T. Cerovsek, A review and outlook for a ‘Building Information Model’ (BIM): a doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2008.11.001.
multi-standpoint framework for technological development, Adv. Eng. Inform. 25 [41] S. Daum, A. Borrmann, Processing of topological BIM queries using boundary rep-
(2) (2011) 224–244, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2010.06.003. resentation based methods, Adv. Eng. Inform. 28 (4) (2014) 272–286, http://dx.
[14] Y. Jung, M. Joo, Building information modelling (BIM) framework for practical im- doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2014.06.001.
plementation, Autom. Constr. 20 (2) (2011) 126–133, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. [42] W. Mazairac, J. Beetz, BIMQL — an open query language for building information
autcon.2010.09.010. models, Adv. Eng. Inform. 27 (4) (2013) 444–456, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.
[15] L. Ding, Y. Zhou, B. Akinci, Building Information Modeling (BIM) application frame- 2013.06.001.
work: the process of expanding from 3D to computable nD, Autom. Constr. 46 [43] U. Isikdag, S. Zlatanova, J. Underwood, A BIM-oriented model for supporting indoor
(2014) 82–93, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2014.04.009. navigation requirements, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 41 (2013) 112–123, http://
[16] R. Volk, J. Stengel, F. Schultmann, Building Information Modeling (BIM) for existing dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2013.05.001.
buildings — literature review and future needs, Autom. Constr. 38 (2014) 109–127, [44] Y.-H. Lin, Y.-S. Liu, G. Gao, X.-G. Han, C.-Y. Lai, M. Gu, The IFC-based path planning
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2013.10.023. for 3D indoor spaces, Adv. Eng. Inform. 27 (2) (2013) 189–205, http://dx.doi.org/
[17] C. Eastman, J.M. Lee, Y.S. Jeong, J.K. Lee, Automatic rule-based checking of building 10.1016/j.aei.2012.10.001.
designs, Autom. Constr. 18 (8) (2009) 1011–1033, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. [45] P. Pauwels, D. Van Deursen, R. Verstraeten, J. De Roo, R. De Meyer, R. Van de Walle,
autcon.2009.07.002. J. Van Campenhout, A semantic rule checking environment for building perfor-
[18] W. Zhou, J. Whyte, R. Sacks, Construction safety and digital design: a review, Autom. mance checking, Autom. Constr. 20 (5) (2011) 506–518, http://dx.doi.org/10.
Constr. 22 (2012) 102–111, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2011.07.005. 1016/j.autcon.2010.11.017.
[19] E.O. Ibem, S. Laryea, Survey of digital technologies in procurement of construction [46] A. Khalili, D.K.H. Chua, IFC-based graph data model for topological queries on
projects, Autom. Constr. 46 (2014) 11–21, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2014. building elements, J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 29 (3) (2015)http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/
07.003. (asce)cp.1943-5487.0000331.
[20] F.H. Abanda, C. Vidalakis, A.H. Oti, J.H.M. Tah, A critical analysis of building informa- [47] E.P. Karan, J. Irizarry, Extending BIM interoperability to preconstruction operations
tion modelling systems used in construction projects, Adv. Eng. Softw. 90 (2015) using geospatial analyses and semantic web services, Autom. Constr. 53 (2015)
183–201, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2015.08.009. 1–12, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2015.02.012.
[21] H.-L. Chi, X. Wang, Y. Jiao, BIM-enabled structural design: impacts and future de- [48] Y. Rezgui, S. Boddy, M. Wetherill, G. Cooper, Past, present and future of information
velopments in structural modelling, analysis and optimisation processes, Arch. and knowledge sharing in the construction industry: towards semantic service-
Comput. Methods Eng. 22 (1) (2015) 135–151, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/ based e-construction? Comput. Aided Des. 43 (5) (2011) 502–515, http://dx.doi.
s11831-014-9127-7. org/10.1016/j.cad.2009.06.005.
[22] H. Son, F. Bosche, C. Kim, As-built data acquisition and its use in production mon- [49] S.K. Lee, K.R. Kim, J.H. Yu, BIM and ontology-based approach for building cost esti-
itoring and automated layout of civil infrastructure: a survey, Adv. Eng. Inform. 29 mation, Autom. Constr. 41 (2014) 96–105, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.
(2) (2015) 172–183, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2015.01.009. 2013.10.020.
[23] J.K.W. Wong, J. Zhou, Enhancing environmental sustainability over building life cy- [50] M. Venugopal, C.M. Eastman, J. Teizer, An ontology-based analysis of the industry
cles through green BIM: a review, Autom. Constr. 57 (2015) 156–165, http://dx. foundation class schema for building information model exchanges, Adv. Eng. In-
doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2015.06.003. form. 29 (4) (2015) 940–957, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2015.09.006.
134 R. Santos et al. / Automation in Construction 80 (2017) 118–136

[51] U. Isikdag, J. Underwood, Two design patterns for facilitating building information [79] J.K.-W. Wong, K.-L. Kuan, Implementing ‘BEAM Plus’ for BIM-based sustainability
model-based synchronous collaboration, Autom. Constr. 19 (5) (2010) 544–553, analysis, Autom. Constr. 44 (2014) 163–175, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2009.11.006. 2014.04.003.
[52] U. Isikdag, Design patterns for BIM-based service-oriented architectures, Autom. [80] M. Marzouk, A. Abdelaty, BIM-based framework for managing performance of sub-
Constr. 25 (2012) 59–71, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2012.04.013. way stations, Autom. Constr. 41 (2014) 70–77, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.
[53] J. Lee, Y. Jeong, User-centric knowledge representations based on ontology for AEC 2014.02.004.
design collaboration, Comput. Aided Des. 44 (8) (2012) 735–748, http://dx.doi. [81] ISO, in: I.O.f. Standardization (Ed.), ISO 14040:2006 Environmental Management-
org/10.1016/j.cad.2012.03.011. Life Cycle Assessment-Principles and Framework 2006, p. 20.
[54] W.L. Shen, Q.P. Shen, Q.B. Sun, Building information modeling-based user activity [82] P. Wu, B. Xia, X. Zhao, The importance of use and end-of-life phases to the life cycle
simulation and evaluation method for improving designer-user communications, greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of concrete — a review, Renew. Sustain. Energy
Autom. Constr. 21 (2012) 148–160, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2011.05. Rev. 37 (2014) 360–369, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.04.070.
022. [83] A. Stadel, J. Eboli, A. Ryberg, J. Mitchell, S. Spatari, Intelligent sustainable design: in-
[55] V. Singh, N. Gu, X. Wang, A theoretical framework of a BIM-based multi-disciplin- tegration of carbon accounting and building information modeling, J. Prof. Issues
ary collaboration platform, Autom. Constr. 20 (2) (2011) 134–144, http://dx.doi. Eng. Educ. Pract. 137 (2) (2011) 51–54, http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(asce)ei.1943-
org/10.1016/j.autcon.2010.09.011. 5541.0000053.
[56] A. Grilo, A. Zutshi, R. Jardim-Goncalves, A. Steiger-Garcao, Construction collabora- [84] J. Basbagill, F. Flager, M. Lepech, M. Fischer, Application of life-cycle assessment to
tive networks: the case study of a building information modelling-based office early stage building design for reduced embodied environmental impacts, Build.
building project, Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf. 26 (1–2) (2013) 152–165, http:// Environ. 60 (2013) 81–92, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2012.11.009.
dx.doi.org/10.1080/0951192x.2012.681918. [85] J.P. Basbagill, F.L. Flager, M. Lepech, A multi-objective feedback approach for evalu-
[57] M. Ajam, M. Alshawi, T. Mezher, Augmented process model for e-tendering: to- ating sequential conceptual building design decisions, Autom. Constr. 45 (2014)
wards integrating object models with document management systems, Autom. 136–150, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2014.04.015.
Constr. 19 (6) (2010) 762–778, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2010.04.001. [86] A. Jrade, F. Jalaei, Integrating building information modelling with sustainability to
[58] T.H. Lin, C.H. Liu, M.H. Tsai, S.C. Kang, Using augmented reality in a multiscreen en- design building projects at the conceptual stage, Build. Simul. 6 (4) (2013)
vironment for construction discussion, J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 29 (6) (2015)http://dx. 429–444, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12273-013-0120-0.
doi.org/10.1061/(asce)cp.1943-5487.0000420. [87] S.G. Al-Ghamdi, M.M. Bilec, Life-cycle thinking and the LEED rating system: global
[59] A. Moum, Design team stories exploring interdisciplinary use of 3D object models perspective on building energy use and environmental impacts, Environ. Sci.
in practice, Autom. Constr. 19 (5) (2010) 554–569, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. Technol. 49 (7) (2015) 4048–4056, http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es505938u.
autcon.2009.11.007. [88] A.H. Oti, W. Tizani, BIM extension for the sustainability appraisal of conceptual
[60] W. Shen, X. Zhang, G.Q. Shen, T. Fernando, The user pre-occupancy evaluation steel design, Adv. Eng. Inform. 29 (1) (2015) 28–46, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.
method in designer-client communication in early design stage: a case study, aei.2014.09.001.
Autom. Constr. 32 (2013) 112–124, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2013.01. [89] S. Kota, J.S. Haberl, M.J. Clayton, W. Yan, Building Information Modeling (BIM)-
014. based daylighting simulation and analysis, Energy Build. 81 (2014) 391–403,
[61] C.M. Eastman, Y.S. Jeong, R. Sacks, I. Kaner, Exchange model and exchange object http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.06.043.
concepts for implementation of national BIM standards, J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 24 [90] L. Díaz-Vilariño, S. Lagüela, J. Armesto, P. Arias, Indoor daylight simulation per-
(1) (2010) 25–34, http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0887-3801(2010)24:1(25). formed on automatically generated as-built 3D models, Energy Build. 68 (Part A)
[62] G. Lee, Y.H. Park, S. Ham, Extended process to product modeling (xPPM) for inte- (2014) 54–62, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2013.02.064.
grated and seamless IDM and MVD development, Adv. Eng. Inform. 27 (4) [91] J.C.P. Cheng, L.Y.H. Ma, A BIM-based system for demolition and renovation waste
(2013) 636–651, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2013.08.004. estimation and planning, Waste Manag. 33 (6) (2013) 1539–1551, http://dx.doi.
[63] T. Froebel, B. Firmenich, C. Koch, Quality assessment of coupled civil engineering org/10.1016/j.wasman.2013.03.001.
applications, Adv. Eng. Inform. 25 (4) (2011) 625–639, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ [92] M. Marzouk, A. Abdelaty, Monitoring thermal comfort in subways using building
j.aei.2011.08.005. information modeling, Energy Build. 84 (2014) 252–257, http://dx.doi.org/10.
[64] A. Motamedi, R. Saini, A. Hammad, B. Zhu, Role-based access to facilities lifecycle 1016/j.enbuild.2014.08.006.
information on RFID tags, Adv. Eng. Inform. 25 (3) (2011) 559–568, http://dx. [93] S. Liu, X.H. Meng, C.M. Tam, Building information modeling based building design
doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2011.03.004. optimization for sustainability, Energy Build. 105 (2015) 139–153, http://dx.doi.
[65] Y. Jiao, Y. Wang, S. Zhang, Y. Li, B. Yang, L. Yuan, A cloud approach to unified org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2015.06.037.
lifecycle data management in architecture, engineering, construction and facilities [94] R. Howard, B.-C. Bjork, Building information modelling — experts' views on
management: integrating BIMs and SNS, Adv. Eng. Inform. 27 (2) (2013) 173–188, standardisation and industry deployment, Adv. Eng. Inform. 22 (2) (2008)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2012.11.006. 271–280, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2007.03.001.
[66] N. Cus-Babic, D. Rebolj, M. Nekrep-Perc, P. Podbreznik, Supply-chain transparency [95] Z. Ma, Z. Wei, W. Song, Z. Lou, Application and extension of the IFC standard in con-
within industrialized construction projects, Comput. Ind. 65 (2) (2014) 345–353, struction cost estimating for tendering in China, Autom. Constr. 20 (2) (2011)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2013.12.003. 196–204, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2010.09.017.
[67] Y.-C. Lin, Construction 3D BIM-based knowledge system: a case study, J. Civ. Eng. [96] J. Choi, J. Choi, I. Kim, Development of BIM-based evacuation regulation checking
Manag. 20 (2) (2014) 186–200, http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/13923730.2013.801887. system for high-rise and complex buildings, Autom. Constr. 46 (2014) 38–49,
[68] European Commission, Directive 2014/24/EU - European Union Public Procure- http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2013.12.005.
ment Directive, 2014. [97] S. Zhang, J. Teizer, J.-K. Lee, C.M. Eastman, M. Venugopal, Building Information
[69] A. Costa, M.M. Keane, J.I. Torrens, E. Corry, Building operation and energy perfor- Modeling (BIM) and safety: automatic safety checking of construction models
mance: monitoring, analysis and optimisation toolkit, Appl. Energy 101 (2013) and schedules, Autom. Constr. 29 (2013) 183–195, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.
310–316, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2011.10.037. autcon.2012.05.006.
[70] K.E. Larsen, F. Lattke, S. Ott, S. Winter, Surveying and digital workflow in energy [98] S. Malsane, J. Matthews, S. Lockley, P.E.D. Love, D. Greenwood, Development of an
performance retrofit projects using prefabricated elements, Autom. Constr. 20 object model for automated compliance checking, Autom. Constr. 49 (2015)
(8) (2011) 999–1011, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2011.04.001. 51–58, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon2014.10.004.
[71] M. Eguaras-Martinez, M. Vidaurre-Arbizu, C. Martin-Gomez, Simulation and evalu- [99] K. Barlish, K. Sullivan, How to measure the benefits of BIM — a case study approach,
ation of building information modeling in a real pilot site, Appl. Energy 114 (2014) Autom. Constr. 24 (2012) 149–159, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2012.02.
475–484, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.09.047. 008.
[72] C. Wang, Y. Cho, M. Gai, As-Is 3D thermal modeling for existing building envelopes [100] K.-F. Chien, Z.-H. Wu, S.-C. Huang, Identifying and assessing critical risk factors for
using a hybrid LIDAR system, J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 27 (6) (2012) 645–656, http://dx. BIM projects: empirical study, Autom. Constr. 45 (2014) 1–15, http://dx.doi.org/
doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000273. 10.1016/j.autcon.2014.04.012.
[73] A. Gupta, A. Cemesova, C.J. Hopfe, Y. Rezgui, T. Sweet, A conceptual framework to [101] P.E.D. Love, J. Matthews, I. Simpson, A. Hill, O.A. Olatunji, A benefits realization
support solar PV simulation using an open-BIM data exchange standard, Autom. management building information modeling framework for asset owners,
Constr. 37 (2014) 166–181, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2013.10.005. Autom. Constr. 37 (2014) 1–10, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2013.09.007.
[74] K.-U. Ahn, Y.-J. Kim, C.-S. Park, I. Kim, K. Lee, BIM interface for full vs. semi-auto- [102] B.K. Giel, R.R.A. Issa, Return on investment analysis of using building information
mated building energy simulation, Energy Build. 68 (2014) 671–678, http://dx. modeling in construction, J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 27 (5) (2013) 511–521, http://dx.
doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2013.08.063. doi.org/10.1061/(asce)cp.1943-5487.0000164.
[75] B. Welle, J. Haymaker, Z. Rogers, ThermalOpt: a methodology for automated [103] G. Lee, H.K. Park, J. Won, D-3 City project — economic impact of BIM-assisted de-
BIM-based multidisciplinary thermal simulation for use in optimization envi- sign validation, Autom. Constr. 22 (2012) 577–586, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.
ronments, Build. Simul. 4 (4) (2011) 293–313, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/ autcon.2011.12.003.
s12273-011-0052-5. [104] P.E.D. Love, I. Simpson, A. Hill, C. Standing, From justification to evaluation: build-
[76] L.C. Bank, B.P. Thompson, M. McCarthy, Decision-making tools for evaluating the ing information modeling for asset owners, Autom. Constr. 35 (2013) 208–216,
impact of materials selection on the carbon footprint of buildings, Carbon Manag. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2013.05.008.
2 (4) (2011) 431–441, http://dx.doi.org/10.4155/cmt.11.33. [105] Y. Rezgui, T. Beach, O. Rana, A governance approach for bim management across
[77] C.R. Iddon, S.K. Firth, Embodied and operational energy for new-build housing: a lifecycle and supply chains using mixed-modes of information delivery, J. Civ.
case study of construction methods in the UK, Energy Build. 67 (2013) 479–488, Eng. Manag. 19 (2) (2013) 239–258, http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/13923730.2012.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2013.08.041. 760480.
[78] S. Azhar, W.A. Carlton, D. Olsen, I. Ahmad, Building information modeling for sus- [106] R. Eadie, M. Browne, H. Odeyinka, C. McKeown, S. McNiff, BIM implementation
tainable design and LEED (R) rating analysis, Autom. Constr. 20 (2) (2011) throughout the UK construction project lifecycle: an analysis, Autom. Constr. 36
217–224, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2010.09.019. (2013) 145–151, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2013.09.001.
 R. Santos et al. / Automation in Construction 80 (2017) 118–136 135

[107] H.C.J. Linderoth, Understanding adoption and use of BIM as the creation of actor [134] W. Yan, C. Culp, R. Graf, Integrating BIM and gaming for real-time interactive archi-
networks, Autom. Constr. 19 (1) (2010) 66–72, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. tectural visualization, Autom. Constr. 20 (4) (2011) 446–458, http://dx.doi.org/10.
autcon.2009.09.003. 1016/j.autcon.2010.11.013.
[108] O. Samuelson, B.-C. Bjork, A longitudinal study of the adoption of IT technology in [135] R. Barak, Y.S. Jeong, R. Sacks, C.M. Eastman, Unique requirements of building infor-
the Swedish building sector, Autom. Constr. 37 (2014) 182–190, http://dx.doi.org/ mation modeling for cast-in-place reinforced concrete, J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 23 (2)
10.1016/j.autcon.2013.10.006. (2009) 64–74, http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0887-3801(2009)23:2(64).
[109] N. Gu, K. London, Understanding and facilitating BIM adoption in the AEC industry, [136] U. Rueppel, K. Schatz, Designing a BIM-based serious game for fire safety evacua-
Autom. Constr. 19 (8) (2010) 988–999, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2010. tion simulations, Adv. Eng. Inform. 25 (4) (2011) 600–611, http://dx.doi.org/10.
09.002. 1016/j.aei.2011.08.001.
[110] J.A. Kraatz, K.D. Hampson, Brokering innovation to better leverage R&D invest- [137] R. Vanlande, C. Nicolle, C. Cruz, lFC and building lifecycle management, Autom.
ment, Build. Res. Inf. 41 (2) (2013) 187–197, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/ Constr. 18 (1) (2008) 70–78, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2008.05.001.
09613218.2013.749771. [138] A. Motamedi, M.M. Soltani, A. Hammad, Localization of RFID-equipped assets dur-
[111] P. Forsythe, S. Sankaran, C. Biesenthal, How far can BIM reduce information asym- ing the operation phase of facilities, Adv. Eng. Inform. 27 (4) (2013) 566–579,
metry in the Australian construction context? Proj. Manag. J. 46 (3) (2015) 75–87, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2013.07.001.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pmj.21504. [139] B.P. Thompson, L.C. Bank, Use of system dynamics as a decision-making tool in
[112] H. Xu, J. Feng, S. Li, Users-orientated evaluation of building information model in building design and operation, Build. Environ. 45 (4) (2010) 1006–1015, http://
the Chinese construction industry, Autom. Constr. 39 (2014) 32–46, http://dx. dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2009.10.008.
doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2013.12.004. [140] A. Grilo, R. Jardim-Goncalves, Cloud-marketplaces: distributed e-procurement for
[113] B. Becerik-Gerber, K. Kensek, Building information modeling in architecture, engi- the AEC sector, Adv. Eng. Inform. 27 (2) (2013) 160–172, http://dx.doi.org/10.
neering, and construction: emerging research directions and trends, J. Prof. Issues 1016/j.aei.2012.10.004.
Eng. Educ. Pract. 136 (3) (2010) 139–147, http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(asce)ei. [141] A. Grilo, R. Jardim-Goncalves, Challenging electronic procurement in the AEC sec-
1943-5541.0000023. tor: a BIM-based integrated perspective, Autom. Constr. 20 (2) (2011) 107–114,
[114] P. Bynum, R.R.A. Issa, S. Olbina, Building information modeling in support of sus- http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2010.09.008.
tainable design and construction, J. Constr. Eng. Manag.-ASCE 139 (1) (2013) [142] R. Jardim-Goncalves, A. Grilo, SOA4BIM: putting the building and construction in-
24–34, http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0000560. dustry in the single European information space, Autom. Constr. 19 (4) (2010)
[115] A. Watson, Digital buildings — challenges and opportunities, Adv. Eng. Inform. 25 388–397, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2009.11.009.
(4) (2011) 573–581, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2011.07.003. [143] A. Redmond, A. Hore, M. Alshawi, R. West, Exploring how information exchanges
[116] B. Becerik-Gerber, F. Jazizadeh, N. Li, G. Calis, Application areas and data require- can be enhanced through cloud BIM, Autom. Constr. 24 (2012) 175–183, http://
ments for BIM-enabled facilities management, J. Constr. Eng. Manag.-ASCE 138 dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2012.02.003.
(3) (2012) 431–442, http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0000433. [144] H.-Y. Chong, J.S. Wong, X. Wang, An explanatory case study on cloud computing
[117] C.S. Dossick, G. Neff, Organizational divisions in BIM-enabled commercial construc- applications in the built environment, Autom. Constr. 44 (2014) 152–162, http://
tion, J. Constr. Eng. Manag.-ASCE 136 (4) (2010) 459–467, http://dx.doi.org/10. dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2014.04.010.
1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0000109. [145] H.-M. Chen, C.-C. Hou, Asynchronous online collaboration in BIM generation using
[118] F. Leite, A. Akcamete, B. Akinci, G. Atasoy, S. Kiziltas, Analysis of modeling effort and hybrid client-server and P2P network, Autom. Constr. 45 (2014) 72–85, http://dx.
impact of different levels of detail in building information models, Autom. Constr. doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2014.05.007.
20 (5) (2011) 601–609, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2010.11.027. [146] J. Matthews, P.E.D. Love, S. Heinemann, R. Chandler, C. Rumsey, O. Olatunj, Real
[119] B. Succar, Building information modelling framework: a research and delivery time progress management: re-engineering processes for cloud-based BIM in con-
foundation for industry stakeholders, Autom. Constr. 18 (3) (2009) 357–375, struction, Autom. Constr. 58 (2015) 38–47, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2008.10.003. 2015.07.004.
[120] J.E. Taylor, P.G. Bernstein, Paradigm trajectories of building information modeling [147] T. Beach, O. Rana, Y. Rezgui, M. Parashar, Governance model for cloud computing in
practice in project networks, J. Manag. Eng. 25 (2) (2009) 69–76, http://dx.doi. building information management, IEEE Trans. Serv. Comput. 8 (2) (2015)
org/10.1061/(asce)0742-597x(2009)25:2(69). 314–327, http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/tsc.2013.50.
[121] A. Porwal, K.N. Hewage, Building Information Modeling (BIM) partnering frame- [148] S. Roh, Z. Aziz, F. Pena-Mora, An object-based 3D walk-through model for interior
work for public construction projects, Autom. Constr. 31 (2013) 204–214, http:// construction progress monitoring, Autom. Constr. 20 (1) (2011) 66–75, http://dx.
dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2012.12.004. doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2010.07.003.
[122] Y. Ren, M.J. Skibniewski, S. Jiang, Building information modeling integrated with [149] M. Akula, R.R. Lipman, M. Franaszek, K.S. Saidi, G.S. Cheok, V.R. Kamat, Real-time
electronic commerce material procurement and supplier performance manage- drill monitoring and control using building information models augmented with
ment system, J. Civ. Eng. Manag. 18 (5) (2012) 642–654, http://dx.doi.org/10. 3D imaging data, Autom. Constr. 36 (2013) 1–15, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.
3846/13923730.2012.719835. autcon.2013.08.010.
[123] F. Peterson, T. Hartmann, R. Fruchter, M. Fischer, Teaching construction pro- [150] L. Klein, N. Li, B. Becerik-Gerber, Imaged-based verification of as-built documenta-
ject management with BIM support: experience and lessons learned, Autom. tion of operational buildings, Autom. Constr. 21 (2012) 161–171, http://dx.doi.org/
Constr. 20 (2) (2011) 115–125, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2010.09. 10.1016/j.autcon.2011.05.023.
009. [151] A. Motamedi, A. Hammad, Y. Asen, Knowledge-assisted BIM-based visual analytics
[124] R. Sacks, R. Barak, Teaching building information modeling as an integral part of for failure root cause detection in facilities management, Autom. Constr. 43 (2014)
freshman year civil engineering education, J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract. 136 (1) 73–83, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2014.03.012.
(2010) 30–38, http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(asce)ei.1943-5541.0000003. [152] A. Dimitrov, M. Golparvar-Fard, Vision-based material recognition for automated
[125] D. Gerber, S. Khashe, I. Smith, Surveying the evolution of computing in architec- monitoring of construction progress and generating building information model-
ture, engineering, and construction education, J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 29 (5) (2013) ing from unordered site image collections, Adv. Eng. Inform. 28 (1) (2014)
04014060, http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000361. 37–49, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2013.11.002.
[126] A. Cavieres, R. Gentry, T. Al-Haddad, Knowledge-based parametric tools for con- [153] M. Golparvar-Fard, F. Pena-Mora, S. Savarese, Automated progress monitoring
crete masonry walls: conceptual design and preliminary structural analysis, using unordered daily construction photographs and IFC-based building informa-
Autom. Constr. 20 (6) (2011) 716–728, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2011. tion models, J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 29 (1) (2015)http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(asce)cp.
01.003. 1943-5487.0000205.
[127] S. Lee, M. Ha, Customer interactive building information modeling for apartment [154] I. Brilakis, L. Manolis, R. Sacks, S. Savarese, S. Christodoulou, J. Teizer, A.
unit design, Autom. Constr. 35 (2013) 424–430, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. Makhmalbaf, Toward automated generation of parametric BIMs based on hybrid
autcon.2013.05.026. video and laser scanning data, Adv. Eng. Inform. 24 (4) (2010) 456–465, http://
[128] B. Welle, Z. Rogers, M. Fischer, BIM-Centric Daylight Profiler for Simulation dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2010.06.006.
(BDP4SIM): a methodology for automated product model decomposition and re- [155] X. Xiong, A. Adan, B. Akinci, D. Huber, Automatic creation of semantically rich 3D
composition for climate-based daylighting simulation, Build. Environ. 58 (2012) building models from laser scanner data, Autom. Constr. 31 (2013) 325–337,
114–134, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2012.06.021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2012.10.006.
[129] M.Y. Rafiq, M.J. Rustell, Building information modeling steered by evolutionary [156] P. Tang, D. Huber, B. Akinci, R. Lipman, A. Lytle, Automatic reconstruction of as-
computing, J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 28 (4) (2014)http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(asce)cp. built building information models from laser-scanned point clouds: a review of re-
1943-5487.0000295. lated techniques, Autom. Constr. 19 (7) (2010) 829–843, http://dx.doi.org/10.
[130] P. Sanguinetti, S. Abdelmohsen, J. Lee, H. Sheward, C. Eastman, General system 1016/j.autcon.2010.06.007.
architecture for BIM: an integrated approach for design and analysis, Adv. [157] S. Lagueela, L. Diaz-Vilarino, J. Armesto, P. Arias, Non-destructive approach for the
Eng. Inform. 26 (2) (2012) 317–333, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2011.12. generation and thermal characterization of an as-built BIM, Constr. Build. Mater. 51
001. (2014) 55–61, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.11.021.
[131] R. Sacks, M. Treckmann, O. Rozenfeld, Visualization of work flow to support lean [158] L. Mahdjoubi, C. Moobela, R. Laing, Providing real-estate services through the inte-
construction, J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 135 (12) (2009) 1307–1315, http://dx.doi. gration of 3D laser scanning and building information modelling, Comput. Ind. 64
org/10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0000102. (9) (2013) 1272–1281, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2013.09.003.
[132] R. Sacks, M. Radosavljevic, R. Barak, Requirements for building information model- [159] Y. Turkan, F. Bosche, C.T. Haas, R. Haas, Toward automated earned value tracking
ing based lean production management systems for construction, Autom. Constr. using 3D imaging tools, J. Constr. Eng. Manag.-ASCE 139 (4) (2013) 423–433,
19 (5) (2010) 641–655, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2010.02.010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0000629.
[133] R. Davies, C. Harty, Implementing ‘Site BIM’: a case study of ICT innovation on a [160] F. Bosche, A. Guillemet, Y. Turkan, C.T. Haas, R. Haas, Tracking the built status of
large hospital project, Autom. Constr. 30 (2013) 15–24, http://dx.doi.org/10. MEP works: assessing the value of a scan-vs.-BIM system, J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 28
1016/j.autcon.2012.11.024. (4) (2014)http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(asce)cp.1943-5487.0000343.
136 R. Santos et al. / Automation in Construction 80 (2017) 118–136

[161] T. Mill, A. Alt, R. Liias, Combined 3D building surveying techniques — Terrestrial [184] J.D. Goedert, P. Meadati, Integrating construction process documentation into
Laser Scanning (TLS) and total station surveying for BIM data management pur- building information modeling, J. Constr. Eng. Manag.-ASCE 134 (7) (2008)
poses, J. Civ. Eng. Manag. 19 (2013) S23–S32, http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/ 509–516, http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-9364(2008)134:7(509).
13923730.2013.795187. [185] S. Song, J. Yang, N. Kim, Development of a BIM-based structural framework optimi-
[162] J. Jung, S. Hong, S. Jeong, S. Kim, H. Cho, S. Hong, J. Heo, Productive modeling for de- zation and simulation system for building construction, Comput. Ind. 63 (9) (2012)
velopment of as-built BIM of existing indoor structures, Autom. Constr. 42 (2014) 895–912, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2012.08.013.
68–77, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2014.02.021. [186] S.-M. Chen, F.H. Griffis, P.-H. Chen, L.-M. Chang, A framework for an automated and
[163] F. Bosche, Plane-based registration of construction laser scans with 3D/4D building integrated project scheduling and management system, Autom. Constr. 35 (2013)
models, Adv. Eng. Inform. 26 (1) (2012) 90–102, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aei. 89–110, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2013.04.002.
2011.08.009. [187] H. Moon, H. Kim, C. Kim, L. Kang, Development of a schedule-workspace interfer-
[164] E.B. Anil, P. Tang, B. Akinci, D. Huber, Deviation analysis method for the assessment ence management system simultaneously considering the overlap level of parallel
of the quality of the as-is building information models generated from point cloud schedules and workspaces, Autom. Constr. 39 (2014) 93–105, http://dx.doi.org/10.
data, Autom. Constr. 35 (2013) 507–516, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2013. 1016/j.autcon.2013.06.001.
06.003. [188] V. Faghihi, K.F. Reinschmidt, J.H. Kang, Construction scheduling using genetic algo-
[165] F. Bosche, E. Guenet, Automating surface flatness control using terrestrial laser rithm based on building information model, Expert Syst. Appl. 41 (16) (2014)
scanning and building information models, Autom. Constr. 44 (2014) 212–226, 7565–7578, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2014.05.047.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2014.03.028. [189] C. Kim, H. Son, C. Kim, Automated construction progress measurement using a 4D
[166] X. Wang, P.E.D. Love, M.J. Kim, C.-S. Park, C.-P. Sing, L. Hou, A conceptual frame- building information model and 3D data, Autom. Constr. 31 (2013) 75–82, http://
work for integrating building information modeling with augmented reality, dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2012.11.041.
Autom. Constr. 34 (2013) 37–44, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2012.10.012. [190] H. Kim, K. Anderson, S. Lee, J. Hildreth, Generating construction schedules through
[167] X. Wang, M. Truijens, L. Hou, Y. Wang, Y. Zhou, Integrating augmented reality with automatic data extraction using open BIM (building information modeling) tech-
building information modeling: onsite construction process controlling for lique- nology, Autom. Constr. 35 (2013) 285–295, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.
fied natural gas industry, Autom. Constr. 40 (2014) 96–105, http://dx.doi.org/10. autcon2013.05.020.
1016/j.autcon.2013.12.003. [191] L. Chen, H. Luo, A BIM-based construction quality management model and its ap-
[168] K.C. Yeh, M.H. Tsai, S.C. Kang, On-site building information retrieval by using pro- plications, Autom. Constr. 46 (2014) 64–73, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.
jection-based augmented reality, J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 26 (3) (2012) 342–355, 2014.05.009.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(asce)cp.1943-5487.0000156. [192] N.C. Babic, P. Podbreznik, D. Rebolj, Integrating resource production and construc-
[169] S. Meza, Z. Turk, M. Dolenc, Component based engineering of a mobile BIM-based tion using BIM, Autom. Constr. 19 (5) (2010) 539–543, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.
augmented reality system, Autom. Constr. 42 (2014) 1–12, http://dx.doi.org/10. autcon.2009.11.005.
1016/j.autcon.2014.02.011. [193] H. Said, K. El-Rayes, Automated multi-objective construction logistics optimization
[170] S. Lee, O. Akin, Augmented reality-based computational fieldwork support for system, Autom. Constr. 43 (2014) 110–122, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.
equipment operations and maintenance, Autom. Constr. 20 (4) (2011) 338–352, 2014.03.017.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2010.11.004. [194] A. Monteiro, J.P. Martins, A survey on modeling guidelines for quantity takeoff-ori-
[171] C.-S. Park, D.-Y. Lee, O.-S. Kwon, X. Wang, A framework for proactive construction ented BIM-based design, Autom. Constr. 35 (2013) 238–253, http://dx.doi.org/10.
defect management using BIM, augmented reality and ontology-based data collec- 1016/j.autcon.2013.05.005.
tion template, Autom. Constr. 33 (2013) 61–71, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon. [195] F.K.T. Cheung, J. Rihan, J. Tah, D. Duce, E. Kurul, Early stage multi-level cost estima-
2012.09.010. tion for schematic BIM models, Autom. Constr. 27 (2012) 67–77, http://dx.doi.org/
[172] P. Abolghasemzadeh, A comprehensive method for environmentally sensitive and 10.1016/j.autcon.2012.05.008.
behavioral microscopic egress analysis in case of fire in buildings, Saf. Sci. 59 [196] T. Hartmann, H. van Meerveld, N. Vossebeld, A. Adriaanse, Aligning building infor-
(2013) 1–9, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2013.04.008. mation model tools and construction management methods, Autom. Constr. 22
[173] N. Li, B. Becerik-Gerber, B. Krishnamachari, L. Soibelman, A BIM centered indoor lo- (2012) 605–613, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2011.12.011.
calization algorithm to support building fire emergency response operations, [197] V. Popov, V. Juocevicius, D. Migilinskas, L. Ustinovichius, S. Mikalauskas, The use of
Autom. Constr. 42 (2014) 78–89, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2014.02.019. a virtual building design and construction model for developing an effective pro-
[174] Z. Hu, J. Zhang, BIM- and 4D-based integrated solution of analysis and manage- ject concept in 5D environment, Autom. Constr. 19 (3) (2010) 357–367, http://
ment for conflicts and structural safety problems during construction: 2. Develop- dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2009.12.005.
ment and site trials, Autom. Constr. 20 (2) (2011) 167–180, http://dx.doi.org/10. [198] Z. Ma, Z. Wei, X. Zhang, Semi-automatic and specification-compliant cost estima-
1016/j.autcon.2010.09.014. tion for tendering of building projects based on IFC data of design model, Autom.
[175] J.P. Zhang, Z.Z. Hu, BIM- and 4D-based integrated solution of analysis and manage- Constr. 30 (2013) 126–135, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2012.11.020.
ment for conflicts and structural safety problems during construction: 1. Principles [199] U. Isikdag, J. Underwood, G. Aouad, An investigation into the applicability of build-
and methodologies, Autom. Constr. 20 (2) (2011) 155–166, http://dx.doi.org/10. ing information models in geospatial environment in support of site selection and
1016/j.autcon2010.09.013. fire response management processes, Adv. Eng. Inform. 22 (4) (2008) 504–519,
[176] C.S. Park, H.J. Kim, A framework for construction safety management and visualiza- http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2008.06.001.
tion system, Autom. Constr. 33 (2013) 95–103, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon. [200] E. Elbeltagi, M. Dawood, Integrated visualized time control system for repetitive
2012.09.012. construction projects, Autom. Constr. 20 (7) (2011) 940–953, http://dx.doi.org/
[177] S.J. Zhang, J. Teizer, N. Pradhananga, C.M. Eastman, Workforce location tracking to 10.1016/j.autcon.2011.03.012.
model, visualize and analyze workspace requirements in building information [201] V.K. Bansal, Use of GIS and topology in the identification and resolution of space
models for construction safety planning, Autom. Constr. 60 (2015) 74–86, http:// conflicts, J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 25 (2) (2011) 159–171, http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/
dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2015.09.009. (asce)cp.1943-5487.0000075.
[178] J. Wang, X.D. Zhang, W.C. Shou, X.Y. Wang, B. Xu, M.J. Kim, P. Wu, A BIM-based ap- [202] J. Irizarry, E.P. Karan, F. Jalaei, Integrating BIM and GIS to improve the visual mon-
proach for automated tower crane layout planning, Autom. Constr. 59 (2015) itoring of construction supply chain management, Autom. Constr. 31 (2013)
168–178, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2015.05.006. 241–254, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2012.12.005.
[179] Z. Riaz, M. Arslan, A.K. Kiani, S. Azhar, CoSMoS: a BIM and wireless sensor based in- [203] C. Mignard, C. Nicolle, Merging BIM and GIS using ontologies application to urban
tegrated solution for worker safety in confined spaces, Autom. Constr. 45 (2014) facility management in ACTIVe3D, Comput. Ind. 65 (9) (2014) 1276–1290, http://
96–106, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2014.05.010. dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2014.07.008.
[180] I. Motawa, A. Almarshad, A knowledge-based BIM system for building mainte- [204] G. Lee, J. Cho, S. Ham, T. Lee, G. Lee, S.-H. Yun, H.-J. Yang, A BIM- and sensor-based
nance, Autom. Constr. 29 (2013) 173–182, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon. tower crane navigation system for blind lifts, Autom. Constr. 26 (2012) 1–10,
2012.09.008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2012.05.002.
[181] J. Lucas, T. Bulbul, W. Thabet, An object-oriented model to support healthcare facil- [205] S.-K. Jeong, Y.-U. Ban, Developing a topological information extraction model for
ity information management, Autom. Constr. 31 (2013) 281–291, http://dx.doi. space syntax analysis, Build. Environ. 46 (12) (2011) 2442–2453, http://dx.doi.
org/10.1016/j.autcon.2012.12.014. org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2011.05.024.
[182] W. Lu, T. Olofsson, Building information modeling and discrete event simulation: [206] C. Langenhan, M. Weber, M. Liwicki, F. Petzold, A. Dengel, Graph-based retrieval of
towards an integrated framework, Autom. Constr. 44 (2014) 73–83, http://dx. building information models for supporting the early design stages, Adv. Eng. In-
doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2014.04.001. form. 27 (4) (2013) 413–426, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2013.04.005.
[183] Y.F. Zhang, L.J. Bai, Rapid structural condition assessment using radio frequency
identification (RFID) based wireless strain sensor, Autom. Constr. 54 (2015)
1–11, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2015.02.013.