Cambridge International AS Level: Environmental Management 8291/11 October/November 2022
Cambridge International AS Level: Environmental Management 8291/11 October/November 2022
Published
This mark scheme is published as an aid to teachers and candidates, to indicate the requirements of the
examination. It shows the basis on which Examiners were instructed to award marks. It does not indicate the
details of the discussions that took place at an Examiners’ meeting before marking began, which would have
considered the acceptability of alternative answers.
Mark schemes should be read in conjunction with the question paper and the Principal Examiner Report for
Teachers.
Cambridge International will not enter into discussions about these mark schemes.
Cambridge International is publishing the mark schemes for the October/November 2022 series for most
Cambridge IGCSE™, Cambridge International A and AS Level components and some Cambridge O Level
components.
These general marking principles must be applied by all examiners when marking candidate answers. They should be applied alongside the
specific content of the mark scheme or generic level descriptors for a question. Each question paper and mark scheme will also comply with these
marking principles.
• the specific content of the mark scheme or the generic level descriptors for the question
• the specific skills defined in the mark scheme or in the generic level descriptors for the question
• the standard of response required by a candidate as exemplified by the standardisation scripts.
Marks awarded are always whole marks (not half marks, or other fractions).
• marks are awarded for correct/valid answers, as defined in the mark scheme. However, credit is given for valid answers which go beyond the
scope of the syllabus and mark scheme, referring to your Team Leader as appropriate
• marks are awarded when candidates clearly demonstrate what they know and can do
• marks are not deducted for errors
• marks are not deducted for omissions
• answers should only be judged on the quality of spelling, punctuation and grammar when these features are specifically assessed by the
question as indicated by the mark scheme. The meaning, however, should be unambiguous.
Rules must be applied consistently, e.g. in situations where candidates have not followed instructions or in the application of generic level
descriptors.
Marks should be awarded using the full range of marks defined in the mark scheme for the question (however; the use of the full mark range may
be limited according to the quality of the candidate responses seen).
Marks awarded are based solely on the requirements as defined in the mark scheme. Marks should not be awarded with grade thresholds or
grade descriptors in mind.
1 Examiners should consider the context and scientific use of any keywords when awarding marks. Although keywords may be present, marks
should not be awarded if the keywords are used incorrectly.
2 The examiner should not choose between contradictory statements given in the same question part, and credit should not be awarded for any
correct statement that is contradicted within the same question part. Wrong science that is irrelevant to the question should be ignored.
3 Although spellings do not have to be correct, spellings of syllabus terms must allow for clear and unambiguous separation from other syllabus
terms with which they may be confused (e.g. ethane / ethene, glucagon / glycogen, refraction / reflection).
4 The error carried forward (ecf) principle should be applied, where appropriate. If an incorrect answer is subsequently used in a scientifically
correct way, the candidate should be awarded these subsequent marking points. Further guidance will be included in the mark scheme where
necessary and any exceptions to this general principle will be noted.
For questions that require n responses (e.g. State two reasons …):
• The response should be read as continuous prose, even when numbered answer spaces are provided.
• Any response marked ignore in the mark scheme should not count towards n.
• Incorrect responses should not be awarded credit but will still count towards n.
• Read the entire response to check for any responses that contradict those that would otherwise be credited. Credit should not be
awarded for any responses that are contradicted within the rest of the response. Where two responses contradict one another, this
should be treated as a single incorrect response.
• Non-contradictory responses after the first n responses may be ignored even if they include incorrect science.
Correct answers to calculations should be given full credit even if there is no working or incorrect working, unless the question states ‘show
your working’.
For questions in which the number of significant figures required is not stated, credit should be awarded for correct answers when rounded by
the examiner to the number of significant figures given in the mark scheme. This may not apply to measured values.
For answers given in standard form (e.g. a 10n) in which the convention of restricting the value of the coefficient (a) to a value between 1
and 10 is not followed, credit may still be awarded if the answer can be converted to the answer given in the mark scheme.
Unless a separate mark is given for a unit, a missing or incorrect unit will normally mean that the final calculation mark is not awarded.
Exceptions to this general principle will be noted in the mark scheme.
Multiples / fractions of coefficients used in chemical equations are acceptable unless stated otherwise in the mark scheme.
State symbols given in an equation should be ignored unless asked for in the question or stated otherwise in the mark scheme.
dust;
affects plant species / photosynthesis / air quality;
long-term:
creation of new aquatic habitat;
potential for different species to flourish;
deforestation;
change in nature of habitat alters local environment / decrease in population of certain species;
loss of biodiversity;
1(b) local: 4
creates jobs;
more money circulates in community;
national:
provides energy source / renewable energy source;
relatively cheap energy;
could have energy to export / improves economy;
10.8(%);
3(a)(ii) when all people, at all times, have physical, social and economic access to sufficient; 2
safe and nutritious food that meets their dietary needs and food preferences for an active and healthy life;
3(a)(iii) population growth results in more people to feed, supply may not keep up with demand; 4
unsustainable production, demand greater than supply;
climate change, damage to crops / land, e.g. flooding reducing food available;
transportation issues due to natural disasters / war or conflict;
3(b) Africa Rising works on local and individual projects / helping them and people around them; 3
to educate / introduce new skills;
to both genders;
targets appropriate areas of agriculture for each project / improve agriculture;
meaning a more guaranteed crop;
reducing food insecurity;
4(a) borehole; 2
aquifer;
artesian well;
poverty reduction;
international agreement and water-related aid;
rationing;
e.g. hosepipe bans / car washing;
5(a)(iv) as heat; 2
from respiration;
as waste;
e.g. faeces;
increase in phytoplankton;
due to reduction in feeding by squid;
5(b)(i) oxygen; 2
carbon dioxide;
water;
6 ‘International agreements are the main reason why the populations of humpback, grey and blue whale species 20
have increased over the past 50 years.’
Indicative content
Answers should show understanding of the roles of the named organisations/protocols:
CITES (the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora), an agreement between
international governments to protect species of wild animals and plants from over-exploitation through international trade. It
regulates this international trade by use of permits for both imports and exports. CITES is a conservation agreement with
183 parties.
IWC (International Whaling Commission) is responsible for the management of whaling and conservation of whales which
was set up in 1946. It has 88 member governments from countries around the world. The IWC regulates whaling and is
also involved in other conservation issues such as bycatch and entanglement, ocean noise, pollution and debris, collision
between whales and ships, and sustainable whale watching.
Candidates may also refer to activist groups such as Greenpeace and Friends of the Earth and the disruption of whaling
fleets and protests at traditional whaling festivals such as that in Iceland.
Agreements were difficult especially with those countries with a tradition of whaling and using whale products.
Quotas and bans were introduced and some level of monitoring took place. Some countries refused to accept quotas.
6 Finding alternatives to whale-based products was also part of the strategy. The increase in numbers suggests some
measure of success as the species have shown significant rises in populations.
Candidates could argue that the change has been brought about as a result in changing attitudes, less interest in whale-
based products and as a consequence less of a market so it became unprofitable.
3 • Responses contain reasoned explanations with knowledge that indicates a strong conceptual 7–8
understanding of the topic.
• Incorporates frequent use of directly relevant examples.
2 • Responses contain explanations with some gaps or errors in the reasoning. 4–6
• Explanations may lack detail or accurate knowledge.
• Examples are included but some opportunities to include relevant examples are missed.
1 • Responses contain a few general points, which are mainly descriptive, comprising a few 1–3
simple points.
• Knowledge is basic and understanding may be poor and lack relevance to the question set.
• Irrelevant or no examples are given.
0 • No creditable response. 0
6
Level AO3: Investigation skills and making judgements Marks
3 • One side of the argument is better developed than the other. 7–9
• Judgements are partially supported with qualitative and/or quantitative information.
• Conclusion is consistent with the question and candidate response.
0 • No creditable response. 0
7 Evaluate the success of strategies to manage energy security in a location of your choice. 20
Indicative content
Candidates should define energy security as the reliable availability of energy sources at an affordable price with a
consideration of the environmental impacts.
With reference to an appropriate location, candidates should discuss a range of strategies and evaluate their success.
Candidates may refer to increasing energy efficiency in terms of production methods and strategies to reduce consumption
and waste, which could include insulation systems, switching off lights, smart meters etc., increasing energy production
through increasing development of generating systems, reducing reliance on fossil fuels, investing in renewable resources
(with examples such as solar panel farms, HEP, tidal barrages and wind power, both domestic small scale and industrial
size generation) and carbon neutral fuels, development of alternative energy technologies such as hybrid cars, fuel cells,
investment in local energy projects and rationing.
7 Candidates should describe the strategy, explain why it is a valid response to energy insecurity and evaluate the relative
success or otherwise.
3 • Responses contain reasoned explanations with knowledge that indicates a strong conceptual 7–8
understanding of the topic.
• Incorporates frequent use of directly relevant examples.
2 • Responses contain explanations with some gaps or errors in the reasoning. 4–6
• Explanations may lack detail or accurate knowledge.
• Examples are included but some opportunities to include relevant examples are missed.
1 • Responses contain a few general points, which are mainly descriptive, comprising a few 1–3
simple points.
• Knowledge is basic and understanding may be poor and lack relevance to the question set.
• Irrelevant or no examples are given.
0 • No creditable response. 0
7
Level AO3: Investigation skills and making judgements Marks
3 • One side of the argument is better developed than the other. 7–9
• Judgements are partially supported with qualitative and/or quantitative information.
• Conclusion is consistent with the question and candidate response.
0 • No creditable response. 0