Impact Test Lab Report
Impact Test Lab Report
1
Abstract
Toughness is a property, which is capacity of material to resist fracture, when subjected to impact.
That is the energy absorbed during the fracture. The toughness of the material depends on following
testing involves the sudden and dynamic application of the load. Parts such as shafts, bolts, anvils and
dies are examples of items subjected to impact loading. Th machine measures the amount of energy
absorbed by the specimen for the rapture in Joules unit. The amount of energy absorbed can give an
idea indication of the toughness of a material. It can classify the different types of materials into either
0 1.23
30 1.28
100 1.36
2
Table of Content
Introduction…………………………………………………………………page 4 – 5
Objective……………………………………………………………………page 6
Theory………………………………………………………………………page 7 – 8
Apparatus…………………………………………………………………...page 9
Procedure…………………………………………………………………...page 10 -12
Report………………………………………………………………………page 13
Results………………………………………………………………………page 14 – 15
Discussion…………………………………………………………………..page 16
Conclusion………………………………………………………………….page 17
Reference…………………………………………………………………...page 18
Appendix…………………………………………………………………....page 19
3
Introduction
The impact test determines the impact toughness, which is a material property of metals, most
commonly by measuring the work required to fracture metallic specimen under impact. The impact
toughness test of metals provides information on ductile-brittle nature of metallic material upon
different temperature.
There are two state administered test named Charpy and Izod, were planned advertisement utilized
widely to gauge the effect vitality. For the two tests, the example is broken by a solitary over-burden
occasion because of the effect of the pendulum. A stop pointer is utilized to record how far the
pendulum swings back up after cracking to cracking the specimen. This effect sturdiness of a metal is
controlled by estimating the vitality consumed in the break of the specimen. This is essentially
achieved by taking note of the stature at which the pendulum is discharged and the tallness to which
the pendulum swings after it has struck the specimen. The tallness of the pendulum times the
heaviness of the pendulum delivers the potential vitality and the distinction in potential vitality of the
pendulum towards the begin and the finish of the test is equivalent to the assimilated vitality.
Since toughness is largely affected by temperature, a Charpy and Izod test is often repeated numerous
times with each specimen tested at a different temperature. This produces a graph of impact toughness
for the material as a function of temperature. An impact toughness versus temperature graph for a
steel is shown in the image. It can be observed that at low temperatures the material is more brittle
and impact toughness is low. At high temperatures the material is more ductile and impact toughness
4
is higher. The transition temperature is the boundary between brittle and ductile behavior and this
5
Objective
To conduct a V-notch impact test and determine the impact strength and ductile-to-brittle transition
temperature of steel.
6
Theory
Toughness is a measure of the amount of energy a material can absorb before fracturing. Brittle
fracture is accentuated if the material is subjected to triaxial stresses, a high strain rate or low
temperatures. The notched bar impact test was devised to simulate these conditions, in order test the
resistance of a material to failure under the most unfavourable conditions of loading that might be
encountered in service. Two standardized tests, the Charpy and Izod, are commonly used to measure
impact energy (sometimes referred to as Notch Toughness). For both Charpy and Izod, a V-notch is
machined into a bar specimen with either a round or square cross section. A standard V-notch test
apparatus is schematically illustrated in Figure 1. The load is applied as an impact blow from a
weighted pendulum hammer that is released from a predetermined height h. The specimen is
positioned at the base as shown (Figure 1). Upon release, a knife edge mounted on the pendulum
strikes and fractures the specimen at the notch, which acts as a point of stress concentration for the
high velocity impact blow. The pendulum continues its swing, rising to a maximum height h’, which
is lower than the original height. Based on the difference in the two heights, the energy (J or Nm)
absorbed by the specimen, the difference in potential energy of the pendulum before and after the test,
is E = mg(h-h '), where m is the mass of the pendulum and g is the acceleration due to gravity. The
primary difference between the Charpy and Izod techniques lies in the manner of specimen support as
is indicated in Figure 1. Variables including specimen size and shape, as well as notch configuration
and depth can influence the test results. The Charpy test is more convenient when the specimens are
in the heated or frozen condition, since the setting of the specimen is more quickly performed, and
7
Figure 2
8
APPARATUS:
• Specimens
• Thermometer
• Water
• Dry ice
• Hot plate/furnace
• Oven
• Bowls, tongs
• Safety glasses
9
Procedure
Safety Warning
• Make sure everyone is away from the machine before releasing the pendulum.
A. Specimens
The specimens were placed into the available temperature media that was used:
1. The operation of the machine and associated accessories was studied before proceeding with the
testing.
2. The machine was set up by lifting the tups up to and secured it into the catches. The safety catch
4. The lever at the top of the machine was pressed to release the tups.
10
5. The frictional losses was recorded.
6. The desired specimen was placed onto the support with notch facing backside of the striking
direction (as quickly as possible for cold and hot specimens) and center the notch in between the
anvils.
7. The tups was lifted to the testing position and were secured into the catches. The safety catch was
9. When ready to test, the lever at the top of the machine was pressed to release the tups. (The time it
takes to remove the specimen from the hot and cold media and complete the test should be ~5
seconds.)
10. The energy required to fracture the specimen was recorded by reading the gauge.
11. The fracture surface appearance was observed and noted. (A digital camera would be an asset)
1. The operation of the machine and associated accessories was studied before proceeding with the
testing.
2. The pendulum at the starting position was supported by the catch and placed the pointer to 120
6. The specimen was placed onto the support with notch facing forward the direction of striker of the
11
7. The pendulum was lifted to the starting position and secured it to the catch.
10. The amount of energy consumed by the specimen for its rupture was later recorded.
11. The fracture surface appearance was observed and noted. (A digital camera would be an asset)
13. When complete, the tups was locked with the pin provided.
12
Report
1. For each type of material, determine the impact strength and its uncertainty at room temperature.
2. For each material, plot the mean fracture energy versus the temperature.
4. Describe the fracture surface appearance for each type of specimen and for each
temperature.
6. What errors should be minimized (and how) to improve the accuracy of your results?
13
Results
Friction (ft/lb) 6
area (mm^2)
.5 .5 .5 .5 .5 .5 .5 .5
9.8 5 .9 .8 5 .9
8.5 .5
Calculations
= 113.8/78.54
= 1.45 ft/lb
14
= π52
= 78.54 mm2
AE*EC = BE*ED
AC = 2 √(2(5) − 2) ∗ 2
AC = 8 mm
= ½ (52) sinƟ
To find angle, Ɵ:
AE/R = sin(0.5* Ɵ)
0.5AC/R = sin(0.5* Ɵ)
0.5∗𝐴𝐶
Therefore, Ɵ = 2 ∗ sin−1 𝑅
15
0.5 ∗ 𝐴𝐶
Ɵ = 2 ∗ sin−1
𝑅
0.5 ∗ 8
Ɵ = 2 ∗ sin−1
5
Ɵ = 106.260
Ɵ 1
Area of segment = ∗ 𝜋𝑅 2 − 𝑅 2 𝑠𝑖𝑛Ɵ
360 2
Ɵ 1
Notch area = 𝜋𝑅 2 − [360 ∗ 𝜋𝑅 2 − 2 𝑠𝑖𝑛Ɵ]
𝜋Ɵ
= 𝑅 2 (𝜋 − (360) + 0.5sinƟ
𝜋106.26
= 52 (𝜋 − ( 360
)+ 0.5sin106.26
Uncertainty
16
Mean fracture energy vs temperature
1.30
Mean fracture energy (ft/lb)
1.26
1.24
1.22
1.20
1.18
1.16
1.14
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
Temperature (degrees celcius)
Discussion
The main of the lab conducted was to determine the impact strength and ductile-to-brittle
transition temperature of steel. With further experimenting, it was noticed that with temperature, then
property of the specimen varies. Hence the toughness which is a major property of a material tend to
increases and vice versa. The standard condition that the lab was conducted with the temperatures; 00,
300, 1000. The transition temperature from the graph of the impact strength against temperature was
not 100% accurate due to the loss of temperature when transferring the specimen form the heater to
the Izod machine and the delay when setting up the specimen in the machine. Sources of errors
17
include Parallax error when reading the value of the energy, the AC which contributed to temperature
loss and human error in data analysis. The impact strength at 00 is 1.23 ft/lb, 300 is 1.28 ft/lb and the
Conclusion
material depends on the amount of energy absorbed by the material. There is a variation of toughness
under different temperatures. Hence, the toughness will increase with high temperature and vice versa
for low temperature. The impact test is conducted in three different temperatures (0 0C, 30 0C, 100 0C)
to explore the variations when hit by the hammer. Temperature can change the behavior of steel from
brittle to ductile with addition of heat and from ductile to brittle with the reduction of heat.
Furthermore, a greater amount of energy is required to break a ductile material than a brittle material.
Therefore, we can conclude from the graph of Impact strength against Temperature proves the theory
18
of ductility of a material varies with the temperature and it shows that the material is more ductile at
Reference
19
Appendix
20
Symbol Definition
0
C degrees Celsius
Nm Newton meters
J Joules
E Energy
h height
m mass
g gravitational acceleration
21