10 Rules For Better Data - Avoid PCB Design Issues
10 Rules For Better Data - Avoid PCB Design Issues
By following key data preparation rules and best practices, PCB designers can
guidelines for ensuring better data quality and usage to minimize errors and
Benefits:
Resistors: R_XXX
Capacitors: C_XXX
Integrated Circuits: U_XXX
Inductors: L_XXX
Test Points: TP_XXX
Jumpers: JP_XXX
Benefits:
Benefits:
data:
Benefits:
Benefits:
Benefits:
configuration required:
Benefits:
Benefits:
Benefits:
Benefits:
design data. This minimizes errors originating from data ambiguities as the
Congested Routing
These kinds of issues routinely occur when data discipline is insufficient. They
these pitfalls.
the design process. It pays dividends through reduced errors, fewer revisions,
Company X found themselves struggling with a stuck PCB project that had
Situation:
Diagnosis:
Resolution:
The team was forced to take several steps back and fix the underlying data issues:
Standardized component naming schemes were established.
Accurate 3D models for all packages were created.
All mechanical spacing requirements were defined ahead of placement.
Layer stack materials and properties were specified completely.
Extensive design reviews performed at multiple points.
Outcome:
Addressing these data issues required over 3 weeks of rework but prevented further
delays down the line.
Extra time validating data initially helped avoid numerous back-and-forth corrections
later.
The project ultimately released on-time after incorporating data best practices.
Summary
High quality PCB design data is essential for avoiding unnecessary issues
during layout, analysis, fabrication and assembly. Inferior data leads to costly
Investing more effort upfront in getting design data right provides significant
Developing good data habits, methods and tool capabilities is well worth the
quality?
A: Poor data quality can increase project effort and costs in various ways:
Extra design reviews and verification to find data issues - 10-15% more time
Iterative board spins to fix data-related flaws - Each spin adds 1-2 weeks
Additional prototyping to validate fixes - 2-4 more prototype builds
Increased manufacturing costs due to data ambiguities - Adds 5-10%
Greater chance of field failures due to uncaught issues - 2-3X more likely
Viewing the cumulative added time, cost and risk makes a strong case for
Q: What data standards are most crucial for PCB design success?
Formalizing these standards across the design team and tools is essential.
data practices?
Quantifying the reduced costs and schedule gains can justify the effort
benefits?
pressures?