6420 PHENOLS 6420 A. Introduction: 1. Sources and Significance
6420 PHENOLS 6420 A. Introduction: 1. Sources and Significance
6420 A. Introduction
1. Sources and Significance The methods presented in this section are intended for the
Phenols are found in many wastewaters and some raw source determination of individual phenolic compounds. For specific
waters in the United States. They generally are traceable to compounds covered, see each method. Method 6420B is a gas
industrial effluents or landfills. These compounds have a low chromatographic (GC) method using liquid-liquid extraction
taste threshold in potable waters and also may have a detrimental and either flame ionization detection (FID) or derivatization
effect on human health at higher levels. and electron capture detection (ECD) to determine a wide
variety of phenols at relatively low concentrations. In addi-
2. Selection of Method tion, 6420C, a liquid-liquid extraction gas chromatographic/
For methods of determining total phenols in water and waste- mass spectrometric (GC/MS) method, can be used to deter-
water, see Section 5530. mine the phenols at slightly higher concentrations.
This method is applicable to the determination of phenol and The basic sample wash (6420B.5a) may cause low recovery of
certain substituted phenols* in municipal and industrial dis- phenol and 2,4-dimethylphenol. Results obtained under these
charges. When analyzing unfamiliar samples for any or all of conditions are minimum concentrations.
these compounds, support the identifications by at least one c. Detection levels: The method detection level (MDL) is the
additional qualitative technique. Alternatively, use the derivati- minimum concentration of a substance that can be measured and
zation, cleanup, and electron capture detector gas chromatogra- reported with 99% confidence that the value is above zero. The
phy (ECD/GC) procedure to confirm measurements made by the MDL concentrations listed in Tables 6420:I and II were obtained
flame ionization detector gas chromatographic (FID/GC) proce- by using reagent water. Similar results were achieved with
dure. The method for base/neutrals and acids (Section 6410B) representative wastewaters. The MDL actually obtained in a
provides gas chromatograph/mass spectrometer (GC/MS) condi- given analysis will vary, depending on instrument sensitivity and
tions appropriate for qualitative and quantitative confirmation of matrix effects.
results using the extract produced. d. Safety: The toxicity or carcinogenicity of each reagent used
in this method has not been defined precisely. Take special care
1. General Discussion in handling pentafluorobenzyl bromide, which is a lachrymator,
and 18-crown-6-ether, which is highly toxic.
a. Principle: See Section 6010C.2 for discussion of gas chro-
matographic principles. A measured volume of sample is acidi- 2. Sampling and Storage
fied and extracted with methylene chloride. The extract is dried
and exchanged to 2-propanol during concentration. The extract is See Section 6410B.2.
separated by gas chromatography and phenols are measured with
a flame ionization detector. 3. Apparatus
The method provides for a derivatization and column chroma-
tography cleanup procedure to aid in the elimination of interfer- Use all the apparatus specified in Section 6410B.3a– g and i–
ences. Derivatives are analyzed by an electron capture k, and in addition:
detector. a. Chromatographic column, 100 mm long 10 mm ID, with
b. Interferences: TFE stopcock.
1) General precautions—See Section 6410B.1b1). b. Reaction flask, 15- to 25-mL round-bottom, with standard
2) Other countermeasures—The cleanup procedure in tapered joint, fitted with a water-cooled condenser and U-shaped
6420B.5c2) can be used to overcome many of these inteferences, drying tube containing granular calcium chloride.
but unique samples may require additional cleanup to achieve c. Gas chromatograph:† An analytical system complete with
the method detection levels. a temperature-programmable gas chromatograph suitable for on-
* 4-Chloro-3-methylphenol; 2-chlorophenol; 2,4-dichlorophenol; 2,4-dimethyl- † Gas chromatographic methods are extremely sensitive to the materials used.
phenol; 2,4-dinitrophenol; 2-methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol; 2-nitrophenol; 4-nitrophe- Mention of trade names by Standard Methods does not preclude the use of other
nol; pentachlorophenol; phenol; 2,4,6-trichlorophenol. existing or as-yet-undeveloped products that give demonstrably equivalent results.
https://doi.org/10.2105/SMWW.2882.125 1
PHENOLS (6420)/Liquid–Liquid Extraction GC Method
TABLE 6420:I. CHROMATOGRAPHIC CONDITIONS AND METHOD TABLE 6420:II. SILICA GEL FRACTIONATION AND ELECTRON CAPTURE GAS
DETECTION LEVELS CHROMATOGRAPHY OF PFBB DERIVATIVES
Method Method
Percent Recovery
Retention Detection Retention Detection
by Fraction*
Time Level Parent Time Level
Compound min g/L Compound 1 2 3 4 min g/L
https://doi.org/10.2105/SMWW.2882.125 2
PHENOLS (6420)/Liquid–Liquid Extraction GC Method
5. Procedure
https://doi.org/10.2105/SMWW.2882.125 3
PHENOLS (6420)/Liquid–Liquid Extraction GC Method
https://doi.org/10.2105/SMWW.2882.125 4
PHENOLS (6420)/Liquid–Liquid Extraction GC Method
A response for compound to be measured, Using a pipet, prepare QC check samples at a concentration of
I amount of internal standard added to each extract, g, 100 g/L by adding 1.00 mL of 100 g/mL QC check sample
A response for internal standard, and concentrate to each of four 1-L portions reagent water. Analyze
V volume of water extracted, L. check samples according to the method of 6420B.5 and proceed
with the check described in Sections 6200A.5a1) and 2). Use
b. Derivatization and ECD/GC analysis: To determine con- acceptance criteria given in Table 6420:III.
centration of individual compounds in the sample, use the equa- c. Analyses of laboratory-fortified samples: On an ongoing
tion: basis, make known additions to at least 10% of the samples from
each sample site being monitored. For laboratories analyzing one
(A) (V ) (B) (D) to ten samples per month, analyze at least one such sample with
Concentration, g/L a known addition per month. Use the procedure detailed in
(V ) (V ) (C) (E)
Sections 6200A.5c7) and 8), but use an addition of 100 g/L
rather than 20 g/L and compare percent recovery for each
where:
compound with the corresponding QC acceptance criteria found
A mass of underivatized phenol represented by area of peak in Table 6420:III. If the known addition was at a concentration
in sample chromatogram, determined from calibration curve 100 g/L, use either the QC acceptance criteria in Table
in 6420B.5c4), ng, 6420:III or optional QC acceptance criteria calculated for the
V total volume of column eluate or combined fractions from specific addition concentration based on the equations in Table
which V was taken, L, 6420:IV.
B total volume of hexane added in 6420B.5c1), mL, d. Quality-control check standard analysis: If analysis of any
D total volume of 2-propanol extract before derivatization, compound fails to meet the acceptance criteria for recovery,
mL, prepare and analyze a QC check standard containing each com-
V volume of eluate injected, L, pound that failed. NOTE: The frequency for the required analysis
V volume of water extracted in 6420B.5a, mL,
of a QC check standard will depend on the number of com-
C volume of hexane sample solution added to cleanup column
pounds being tested for simultaneously, the complexity of the
in 6420B.5c2), mL, and
E volume of 2-propanol extract carried through derivatization
sample matrix, and the performance of the laboratory.
in 6420B.5c1), mL. Prepare the QC check standard by adding 1.0 mL of QC check
sample concentrate to 1 L reagent water and proceed as in
Report results in g/L without correction for recovery. Report Section 6200A.5a3) using Table 6420:III.
QC data with sample results. e. Bias assessment and records: Assess method bias and
maintain records as directed in Section 6410B.7e.
7. Quality Control
https://doi.org/10.2105/SMWW.2882.125 5
PHENOLS (6420)/Liquid–Liquid Extraction GC/MS Method
wastewaters with known additions at six concentrations over 3. KAWAHARA, F.K. 1968. Microdetermination of derivatives of phenols
the range 12 to 450 g/L. Single-operator precision, overall and mercaptans by means of electron capture gas chromatography.
precision, and method bias were found to be related directly Anal. Chem. 40:100.
to compound concentration and essentially independent of 4. U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY. 1984. Definition and pro-
sample matrix. Linear equations describing these relation- cedure for the determination of the method detection limit. 40 CFR
ships for a flame ionization detector are presented in Table Part 136, Appendix B. Fed. Reg. 49, No. 209.
6420:IV. 5. U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY. 1984. Development of
detection limits, EPA Method 604, Phenols; Special letter report for
EPA Contract 68-03-2625. Environmental Monitoring and Support
9. References Lab., Cincinnati, Ohio.
6. BURKE, J.A. 1965. Gas chromatography for pesticide residue analysis;
1. U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY. 1984. Method 604: Phe- some practical aspects. J. Assoc. Offic. Anal. Chem. 48:1037.
nols. 40 CFR Part 136, 43290; Fed. Reg. 49, No. 209. 7. U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY. 1984. EPA Method Study
2. U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY. 1984. Determination of phenols 14, Method 604 —Phenols; EPA-600/4-84-044. National Technical
in industrial and municipal wastewaters; Final rep. EPA Contract 68-03- Information Serv., PB84-196211, Springfield, Va.
2625. Environmental Monitoring and Support Lab., Cincinnati, Ohio.
https://doi.org/10.2105/SMWW.2882.125 6