Topological Transitivity
Topological Transitivity
net/publication/220579884
Topological transitivity
CITATIONS READS
7 2,610
2 authors:
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Sergiy Kolyada on 27 September 2014.
Sergiy Kolyada and Ľubomír Snoha (2009), Scholarpedia, 4(2):5802. doi:10.4249/scholarpedia.5802 revision #91880 [link to/cite this article]
Ľubomír Snoha, Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Matej Bel University, Banská Bystrica, Slovakia
The concept of topological transitivity goes back to G. D. Birkhoff [1] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_David_Birkhoff) who introduced it in 1920 (for
flows). This article will concentrate on topological transitivity of dynamical systems given by continuous mappings in metric spaces. Intuitively, a
topologically transitive dynamical system has points which eventually move under iteration from one arbitrarily small open set to any other. Consequently,
such a dynamical system cannot be decomposed into two disjoint sets with nonempty interiors which do not interact under the transformation.
Contents
1 Topological transitivity versus the existence of a dense orbit
2 Some of the equivalent definitions of transitivity
3 Some examples of transitive maps
4 Transitivity of a map and its iterates
5 Transitive and intransitive points
6 Hitting times and notions related to transitivity
7 Transitivity and chaos
8 Transitivity and topological entropy
9 Transitivity of (semi)group actions
10 References
11 See also
12 External links
1 of 9 09/27/2014 09:12 AM
Topological transitivity - Scholarpedia http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Topological_transitivity
Let X be a metric space with the metric d and f : X → X be continuous. The dynamical system (X, f ) is called topologically transitive if it satisfies the
following condition.
(TT) For every pair of non-empty open sets U and V in X, there is a non-negative integer n such that f n (U) ∩ V ≠ ∅.
However, some authors choose, instead of (TT), the following condition as the definition of topological transitivity.
(DO) There is a point x0 ∈ X such that the orbit {x0 , f (x0 ), … f n (x0 ), …} is dense in X.
Unfortunately, the two conditions are independent in general. To see that (DO) does not imply (TT), consider X = {0} ∪ {1/n : n ∈ ℕ} endowed with the
usual metric and f : X → X defined by f (0) = 0 and f (1/n) = 1/(n + 1), n = 1, 2, … .To show that (TT) does not imply (DO), start with I = [0, 1] and
the standard tent map g(x) = 1 − |2x − 1| from I to itself. Then let X be the union of all periodic orbits of g and f = g|X . The system (X, f ) does not satisfy
the condition (DO), since X is infinite (dense in I ) while the orbit of any periodic point is finite. On the other hand, every pair of subintervals of I shares a
periodic orbit of the tent map and so (X, f ) satisfies (TT).
Nevertheless, under some additional assumptions on the phase space (or on the map) the two conditions (TT) and (DO) are equivalent. In fact, if X has no
isolated point then (DO) implies (TT) and if X is separable and second category then (TT) implies (DO) ([Silv]).
The systems satisfying (DO) are sometimes called point transitive. In the sequel, when speaking on transitivity, we have topological transitivity in mind.
For subsets A and B of X define the hitting time set n(A, B) = {n ≥ 0 : A ∩ f −n (B) ≠ ∅} . Let (X, f ) be a dynamical system. Then the following are
equivalent:
f is topologically transitive (i.e., (TT) is fulfilled),
for every pair of non-empty open sets U and V in X the hitting time set n(U, V) is infinite,
for every non-empty open set U in X, the (forward) orbit of U is dense in X ,
for every non-empty open set U in X, the backward orbit of U is dense in X ,
every proper closed (forward) invariant subset of X is nowhere dense,
every backward invariant subset of X with non-empty interior is dense.
When studying topological transitivity, it is not restrictive to consider only phase spaces without isolated points. In fact, if a transitive system has an isolated
point then the system is trivial, consisting of just one periodic orbit.
2 of 9 09/27/2014 09:12 AM
Topological transitivity - Scholarpedia http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Topological_transitivity
Every minimal dynamical system is transitive (a system is minimal if all orbits are dense).
Example 1. Consider a homeomorphism of the 2-torus, S : 𝕋 → 𝕋 , of the form S(x, y) = (x + α, y + β) , where 1, α, β ∈ ℝ are rationally independent
and + : ℝ/ℤ × ℝ → ℝ/ℤ is defined in the obvious way. Then S is minimal (and ergodic with respect to Lebesgue measure). M. Rees [R] found a minimal
homeomorphism S1 which is an extension of S (i.e., φ ∘ S1 = S ∘ φ for some continuous surjection φ of 𝕋 ) such that S1 has positive topological entropy. In
fact every n-manifold, n ≥ 2 , which carries a minimal homeomorphism also carries a minimal homeomorphism with positive topological entropy [BCLR].
Example 2. Let K = (kn )n>0 be a sequence of integers kn ≥ 2 . Let ΣK be the set of all one-sided infinite sequences (in )n>0 for which 0 ≤ in ≤ kn . Think
of these sequences as 'integers' in multibase notation, the base of the nth digit in being kn . With the natural (product) topology, ΣK is homeomorphic to the
Cantor set. Define a map αK : ΣK → ΣK which informally may be described as 'add 1 and carry' where the addition is performed at the leftmost term i1 and
the carry proceeds to the right in multibase notation. Then αK is a minimal homeomorphism and is called a generalized adding machine or an odometer.
Concerning noncompact manifolds, Besicovitch [Bes] gave the first explicit example of a transitive homeomorphism of the plane. Transitive
homeomorphisms exist in fact on σ -compact connected n-manifolds, n ≥ 2 , and in some cases they are dense, in the compact open topology, in the space of
all measure preserving homeomorphisms [AP1]. See also [AP].
There are spaces, even metric continua, which do not admit transitive maps. Though for instance a characterization of locally compact subspaces of the real
line admitting a transitive map is known (see [NK]), no characterization of compact metric spaces admitting transitive maps is known. However, in [AC] it is
proved that every finite union of disjoint nondegenerate Peano continua in ℝn admits a transitive map.
3 of 9 09/27/2014 09:12 AM
Topological transitivity - Scholarpedia http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Topological_transitivity
A system (X, f ) is called totally transitive, if the system (X, f n ) is transitive for every n ≥ 1 . If (X, f ) is topologically transitive but (X, f n ) is not, then there
are an integer k ≥ 2 dividing n and sets X 0 , X 1 , . . . , X k−1 such that:
X = X0 ∪ X1 ∪. . . ∪Xk−1 ,
each X i is regular closed (i.e., it is the closure of its interior),
Xi ∩ Xj is nowhere dense whenever i ≠ j ,
f (Xi ) ⊆ Xi+1( mod k) ,
f n (hence also f k ) is transitive on each Xi .
For more details on this topic see [Ban].
Any point with dense orbit is called a transitive point. A point which is not transitive is called intransitive. The image of an intransitive point is intransitive
and if the phase space has no isolated point then also the image of a transitive point is transitive. Further, if the phase space of a system (X, f ) has a countable
i=1 of open sets then the set of transitive points can be expressed in the form ⋂k=1 (⋃n=0 f (U k )) and so it is a Gδ set.
∞ ∞
base {U i }∞ −n
The set of transitive or intransitive points of (X, f ) will be denoted by tr(f ) or intr(f ) , respectively. Assume that X is a compact metric space without isolated
points. Then one of the following holds (see [Kin] or [KS]):
A system (X, f ) is called topologically weakly mixing when the product system (X × X, f × f ) is topologically transitive. An equivalent definition is that for
every pair of non-empty open subsets U and V of X the hitting time set n(U, V) contains arbitrarily long intervals of positive integers ([Fur], see also [Ak1]).
Some stronger notions of mixing in topological dynamics can also be characterized in terms of hitting time sets (see [GW]).
4 of 9 09/27/2014 09:12 AM
Topological transitivity - Scholarpedia http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Topological_transitivity
Transitivity is a widely accepted feature of chaos. It is often required in definitions of chaos as one of several ingredients. However, transitivity alone is pretty
compatible with a very regular behavior of trajectories --- in fact, a transitive system is either very regular or very non-regular. To describe this dichotomy in
more details, we need to recall some definitions.
A point x ∈ X is called Lyapunov stable if, for any ϵ > 0 , there exists δ > 0 such that the inequality d(x, y) < δ yields d(f n (x), f n (y) ≤ ϵ for all integers
n > 0 . This condition means that the iteration sequence {f n : n ≥ 0} is equicontinuous at the point x . A point of this type is therefore also called an
equicontinuity point. The system (X, f ) is called almost equicontinuous if there is a dense Gδ set of equicontinuity points.
So, a point x ∈ X is not Lyapunov stable if there is ϵ > 0 such that arbitrarily close to x there are points y ∈ X with d(f n (x), f n (y) > ϵ for some n > 0 .
We then say that x is Lyapunov ϵ-unstable. A system (X, f ) is said to exhibit sensitive dependence on initial conditions (or is shortly called sensitive) if there
exists ϵ > 0 such that every point x ∈ X is Lyapunov ϵ-unstable. The notion of sensitivity for a system (X, f ) is equivalent to the condition that there exists
ϵ > 0 such that for every non-empty open set U in X there exist x, y ∈ U with lim supn→∞ d(f n (x), f n (y)) > ϵ .
A transitive system (X, f ) is either sensitive or almost equicontinuous. In the latter case the set of equicontinuity points coincides with the set of transitive
points and the map f is a homeomorphism and is uniformly rigid (see [AAB]). For more information on the relation between transitivity and various concepts
of chaos see [AK], [Bl], [Kol], [XJ].
In compact metric spaces in general there is no connection between topological transitivity and topological entropy. A system with positive topological
entropy need not of course be transitive (transitivity is a global property of a system while a system may have positive topological entropy on some small
invariant subset, without being transitive). On the other hand, a transitive system may have zero topological entropy. However, in some spaces topologically
transitive maps have necessarily positive topological entropy. For instance, on a real compact interval every transitive map has topological entropy at least
(1/2) log 2 and there is a transitive map with topological entropy equal (1/2) log 2 . For more information on best lower bounds for the topological entropy of
transitive maps in various spaces see [AKLS], [BS].
Topological transitivity can be studied in a more general setting. An action of a semigroup G on a space X is called topologically transitive if, for every pair of
5 of 9 09/27/2014 09:12 AM
Topological transitivity - Scholarpedia http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Topological_transitivity
non-empty open sets U and V in X , there is an element g ∈ G such that g(U) ∩ V ≠ ∅ . Usually it is at least assumed that the action is separately
continuous in the space variable which means that, for each element g ∈ G , the corresponding map g : X → X is continuous. When G is a group, usually it
is required that for each element g ∈ G , the corresponding map g : X → X be a homeomorphism, see e.g. [CKN].
However, note that the required partial continuity of an action of a (semi)group is just the minimum requirement in topological dynamics. In fact, abstract
topological dynamics is usually developed in the context of (semi)flows. A (semi)flow is a jointly continuous action of a topological (semi)group G on a space
X.
In this article we have in fact considered topological transitivity of ℤ+ -actions where ℤ+ is the additive semigroup {0, 1, 2, …} . Such an action is given by
a map f : X → X . We have assumed continuity of f and so our dynamical system was a particular case of a semiflow ( ℤ+ is a topological semigroup with
respect to the discrete topology).
For more information on topological transitivity of flows see [GH] and [dV] (in [GH] it is called regional transitivity and in [dV] it is called topological
ergodicity). Topological transitivity of partially continuous actions of groups is discussed in [CKN].
References
[AC] S. Agronsky and J. G. Ceder: Each Peano subspace of E k is an ω-limit set, Real Anal. Exchange 17 (1991/92), no. 1, 371-378.
[Al] S. Alpern: Combinatorial approximation by Devaney-chaotic or periodic volume preserving homeomorphisms, Internat. J. Bifur. Chaos Appl. Sci. Engrg.
9 (1999), no. 5, 843-848.
[AP] S. Alpern and V. S. Prasad: Typical dynamics of volume preserving homeomorphisms. Cambridge Tracts in Mathematics, 139, Cambridge University
Press, Cambridge, 2000.
[AP1] S. Alpern and V. S. Prasad: Maximally chaotic homeomorphisms of sigma-compact manifolds, Topology Appl. 105 (2000), no. 1, 103-112.
[AKLS] Ll. Alseda, S. Kolyada, J. Llibre and Ľ. Snoha: Entropy and periodic points for transitive maps, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 351 (1999), no. 4,
1551-1573.
[AnK] D.V. Anosov and A.B. Katok: New examples in smooth ergodic theory. Ergodic diffeomorphisms. Trans. Moccow Math. Soc. 23 (1970), 1-35.
[AH] N. Aoki and K. Hiraide: Topological theory of dynamical systems. Recent advances, North-Holland Mathematical Library 52, North-Holland Publishing
Co., Amsterdam, 1994.
6 of 9 09/27/2014 09:12 AM
Topological transitivity - Scholarpedia http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Topological_transitivity
[Ak] E. Akin: The general topology of dynamical systems, Graduate Studies in Mathematics 1, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1993.
[Ak1] E. Akin: Recurrence in topological dynamics. Furstenberg families and Ellis actions, The University Series in Mathematics, Plenum Press, New York,
1997.
[AAB] E. Akin, J. Auslander and K. Berg: When is a transitive map chaotic? Convergence in ergodic theory and probability (Columbus, OH, 1993), 25-40,
Ohio State Univ. Math. Res. Inst. Publ., 5, de Gruyter, Berlin, 1996.
[BS] F. Balibrea and Ľ. Snoha: Topological entropy of Devaney chaotic maps, Topology Appl. 133 (2003), no. 3, 225-239.
[Ban] J. Banks: Regular periodic decompositions for topologically transitive maps, Ergodic Theory Dynam. Systems 17 (1997), 505-529.
[BCLR] F. Béguin, S. Crovisier and F. Le Roux: Construction of curious minimal uniquely ergodic homeomorphisms on manifolds: the Denjoy-Rees
technique, Ann. Sci. École Norm. Sup. (4) 40 (2007), no. 2, 251-308.
[Bes] A. S. Besicovitch: A problem on topological transformation of the plane, Fund. Math. 28(1937), 61-65.
[Bl] F. Blanchard: Topological chaos: what may this mean?, J. Difference Equ. Appl. 15 (2009), no. 1, 23-46.
[CKN] G. Cairns, A. Kolganova and A. Nielsen: Topological transitivity and mixing notions for group actions. Rocky Mountain J. Math. 37 (2007), no. 2,
371-397.
[DF] F. Daalderop and R. Fokkink: Chaotic homeomorphisms are generic, Topology Appl. 102 (2000), no. 3, 297-302.
[dV] J. de Vries: Elements of topological dynamics, Mathematics and its Applications 257, Kluwer Academic Publishers Group, Dordrecht, 1993.
[Fur] H. Furstenberg: Disjointness in ergodic theory, minimal sets and a problem in Diophantine approximation, Math. Syst. Theory 1 (1967), 1-49.
[Fur1] H. Furstenberg: Recurrence in ergodic theory and combinatorial number theory, M. B. Porter Lectures, Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.,
1981.
[GW] E. Glasner and B. Weiss: On the interplay between measurable and topological dynamics, Handbook of dynamical systems, Vol. 1B, 597-648, Elsevier
B. V., Amsterdam, 2006.
[GH] W. H. Gottschalk and G. A. Hedlund: Topological dynamics, American Mathematical Society Colloquium Publications, Vol. 36, American Mathematical
Society, Providence, R. I., 1955.
[Kin] S. Kinoshita: On orbits of homeomorphisms, Colloq. Math. 6 (1958), 49-53.
7 of 9 09/27/2014 09:12 AM
Topological transitivity - Scholarpedia http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Topological_transitivity
[Kol] S.F. Kolyada: Li-Yorke sensitivity and other concepts of chaos. Ukr. Mat. Zh. 56 (2004), 1043-1061; translation in Ukr. Math. J. 56 (2004), 1242-1257.
[KS] S. Kolyada and Ľ. Snoha: Some aspects of topological transitivity - a survey, Grazer Math. Ber. 334 (1997), 3-35.
[NK] A. Nagar and V. Kannan: Topological transitivity for discrete dynamical systems, pp.410 - 454, in J. C. Misra (Ed.) Applicable Mathematics in the
Golden Age, Narosa Publ. House, New Delhi 2003.
[Ox] J. C. Oxtoby: Note on transitive transformations, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 23(1937), 443-446.
[OU] J. C. Oxtoby and S. M. Ulam: Measure-preserving homeomorphisms and metrical transitivity, Ann. of Math. (2) 42, (1941), 874-920.
[R] M. Rees: A minimal positive entropy homeomorphism of the 2-torus, J. London Math. Soc. (2) 23 (1981), no. 3, 537-550.
[Silv] S. Silverman: On maps with dense orbits and the definition of chaos, Rocky Mountain Jour. Math. 22 (1992), 353-375.
[XJ] J. Xiong: Chaos in a topologically transitive system. Sci. China Ser. A 48 (2005), no. 7, 929-939.
Internal references
See also
Chaos, Complexity, Entropy, Entropy in Chaotic Dynamics, Ergodic theory, Topological dynamics, Topological entropy.
8 of 9 09/27/2014 09:12 AM
Topological transitivity - Scholarpedia http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Topological_transitivity
External links
Wikipedia
Wikipedia: (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Butterfly_effect) Butterfly effect
Wikipedia: Chaos theory (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chaos_theory)
Sponsored by: Prof. James Meiss, Applied Mathematics University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA
Reviewed by (http://www.scholarpedia.org/w/index.php?title=Topological_transitivity&oldid=58148) : Anonymous
Accepted on: 2009-02-18 08:28:25 GMT (http://www.scholarpedia.org/w/index.php?title=Topological_transitivity&oldid=58176)
9 of 9 09/27/2014 09:12 AM