Scribd
Upload
36 views2 pages

Le Hoang Phuc An - 2152367 - Report - CC01 - 2023

This document discusses analyzing and describing random variable data. It contains the results of 6 questions: 1) A normality test on two random variables, NormX and Norm2, found NormX to be more normally distributed. 2) Most observations for NormX and Norm2 fell within expected ranges, with outliers at the ends of the distribution. 3) A uniform distribution plot did not match previous normal distribution plots as different distributions were used. 4) Summary statistics were reported for a data set of 500 values, including mean, median, standard deviation, minimum, maximum, and quartiles. The data was left-skewed. 5) Autocorrelation analysis found lags 3

Uploaded by

Phúc An
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
36 views2 pages

Le Hoang Phuc An - 2152367 - Report - CC01 - 2023

This document discusses analyzing and describing random variable data. It contains the results of 6 questions: 1) A normality test on two random variables, NormX and Norm2, found NormX to be more normally distributed. 2) Most observations for NormX and Norm2 fell within expected ranges, with outliers at the ends of the distribution. 3) A uniform distribution plot did not match previous normal distribution plots as different distributions were used. 4) Summary statistics were reported for a data set of 500 values, including mean, median, standard deviation, minimum, maximum, and quartiles. The data was left-skewed. 5) Autocorrelation analysis found lags 3

Uploaded by

Phúc An
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

1.

Minitab and Describing data


MSSV: 2152367
JX=367
JY=4.5
2.
Question 1:
X= JX-(the third digit of your student ID)=367-5=362
So:
Z=(X-365.211)/3.4=-0,94
Question 2:
We have:
Z=-0.94
So p-value of Z:
P(Z) approximately to P(z>=-0.94) is -0.173609

2. Working with random variables


Question 1:
From the histogram of NormX we can see that the most frequently values are
around 368 which near to the mean of the data, 367. And also, the histogram
of NormX shows that it roughly resembles a bell-shaped curve, which is
characteristic of a normal distribution. The red curve fitted to the histogram
also closely follows this shape. So that, this variable is look like it was drawn
from a normal distribution.
Question 2:
The Anderson-Darling test for the NormX plot is 0.389, which is smaller than
the Norm2 value of 0.411. Additionally, NormX's p-value is 0.383 as opposed
to Norm2's p-value of 0.341, which is greater. As a result, the NormX plot has
a greater p-value than Norm2 for the data to be normally distributed, but for
the Anderson-Darling test, Norm Most observations fall in line with the
straight line in the ranges of 0.7394% to 97.6619% and 1.13909% to 96.0631%
according to the plot of both NormX and Norm2, while the majority of the
outliers are found at the head and tail of the red line.
Question 3:
The plot doesn’t match with the plots I drew in the previous questions
because I use Uniform distribution for this plot while in the previous I used
normal distribution.
Question 4:
N: there are 500 value in the data
Mean: 367.1 is the average value of the distribution.
Median: 367.30 is the central value of the distribution.
Standard Deviation: 4.24 is let us know how the values distribute, near or far
from mean. In this case it show that most of values are near the mean value.
Minimum: 353.90 is the smallest value in the data
Maximum: 380 is the largest value in the data
Q1: 364,13 is the value where 25% other values smaller than and 75% larger
than.
Q3: 370.05 is the value where 25% other value larger than and 25% smaller
than.
Skewness: left-skewed because Mean<Median<Mode (367.1<367.3<368)
Outlier: 380.003 and 353.898.
Question 5:
In the results we see that the lag-3,14,40 predictors are significant at the 0.05
level and other lags are very small. And it doesn’t have any specific pattern.
The data in this series has a weak autocorrelation due to the lack of significant
spikes during the time lags. So the data is random.
Question 6:
When compare to Chi-square table we can see that the value LBQ of lag time
3,4 larger than so this are the only 2 values suggesting that data is not
random.
Hypothesis test for autocorrelations equal to zero (Ljung-Box Q-Test)
Null hypothesis test ( H 0 ¿: μ1=μ2 =μ 3 …=0 due to most of value is below the
limit significant which make them meaningless in the probability and become
0. Thefore, the autocorrelations up to the highest lag are equal to zero,
indicating that there is no autocorrelation in the data.

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy