DUCT SIZING FOR HVAC APPLICATIONMaximum and Recommended Air Velocities 1993 ASHRAE, Air Conditioning System Design Manual5-30 _Alt-Conditioning Systems Design Manual ion and thereby reduce the effectiveness of the connector. Yet flexible connectors prevent damage caused by misalignment and thermal expansion/contraction of ‘equipment piping. . 5.7_ DUCTS Recommended and maximum air velocities for ducts are methods for the design of ductsare in common use—equal friction, static regain, and the T-method. Refer to Chapter 32, Duct Design, in ASHRAE Fundamentals (1993), in which all three methods are explained in detail. ies in Ducts 1 Table 5-2 Maximum and Recommended Air Velo Designation Outdoor air intakes* Filters* Heating coils” Cooling coils* | Air washers* Fan outlets Main ducts Branch ducts? Branch risers* Recommended Velocities, fpm. Schools, Theaters, Residences Public Buildings 500 500 250 300 450 500 450 500 500 500 1000 1600 1300-2000 700 - 900 1000 — 1300 600 ‘600 - 900 500 600-700 Industrial Buildings 500 350 600 600 500 1600 - 2400 1200 - 1800 800 - 1000 800 Outdoor air intakes* Filters* Heating coils*® Cooling coils* Air washers* Fan outlets Main ducts? Branch ducts? Branch risers? Maximum Velocities, fpm 800 900 300 350 500 600 450 500 500 500 1700 1500-2200 800 - 1200 1100 - 1600 700 - 1000 800 - 1300 650 ~ 800 800 ~ 1200 1200 350 700 600 500 1700 - 2800 1300 - 2200 1000 - 1800 1000 - 1600 “These velocities are for total face area, not the net free area; other velocities in the table are for net free area. *For low-velocity systems only.Components 5-31 ‘The Duct Design chapter (ASHRAE 1989b) and the HVAC Systems Duct Design ‘Manual (SMACNA 1990) contain extensive tabulations of pressure losses in ducts. Manufacturers’ data are also freely available. Roughness factors for other than ‘smooth sheet metal ducts can also be found in these references. Internal linings may add 25 10 40% toair resistance, while flexible ducts may add 50%. The latter require ‘special attention so that they remain round and do not collapse or become crushed. Fan power is obtained from BHP = (cfm)[static pressure + velocity pressure (in, of water)|/4100 (4) Recommended cfm per square foot for different conditions are given in ASHRAE Pocket Guide (1993). Minimum ventilation (outside air) requirements are given in ASHRAE Standard 62 or in local codes, which, if they exist, supersede the standard. For supply air systems, use approximate pressure losses of + 0.08 in. of water per 100 linear feet of duct for quiet areas + 0.10 in. of water per 100 lincar feet of duct for ordinary areas * 0.15 in. of water per 100 linear feet of duct for factory areas ‘The pressure loss calculations for a typical 10,000-ft? low-rise office building may appear as follows. They are based on manufacturers’ data or on the SMACNA HVAC Systems Duct Design Manual (1990) except where noted.5-32 Alr-Conditloning Systems Design Manual Supply Air Fan Item Pressure Drop, in. of water Outside air louver 0.05 Mixed-air damper plenum 0.05 Preheat coil 0.13 Filters (dirty) 0.75 Cooling coil (wet) 1.30 Heating coil 0.13 Fan inlet 0.50 VAV inlet vanes 0.75 Fan outlet 0.50 Primary ductwork 2.00 (from calculations) Terminal box 0.20 (from calculations) Air diffuser 0.10 Total 6.66 Return Air Fan Item Pressure Drop, in, of water Roomvplenum/ceiling 0.04 Plenum drop 0.05 Duct inlet 0.03 Fan inlet 0.30 Ductwork 0.50 (from calculations) Fan inlet vanes 0.50 Fan outlet 0.10 Total 1.52 Exhaust Air Fan Item Pressure Drop, in, of water Exhaust register 0.10 Fire damper 0.04 Ductwork 0.50 (from calculations) Total 0.64Components 5-33 A prudent designer will add a safety factor to these values to be sure that adequate fan power has been provided for the system. Makeup air must equal exhaust air plus exfiltration at all times. ‘The exhaust air fan will cause outdoor air to infiltrate unless outdoor air fans supply quantity of outdoor air equal to the exhausted plus exfiltrated air. Ignoring this fact may lead to frozen coils or sprinkler piping in cold climates. Infiltration due to the stack effect alone may require insulation of noncirculating sprinkler piping within 15 ft of the building envelope on lower floors of high-rise buildings. Buildings should be pressurized to reduce or prevent infiltration, Therefore, it is customary to supply approximately 5 to 10% more outside air than exhaust air to make up for exfiltration. The static pressure control needs to reference outside air conditions. The outside air sensor must not be sensitive to weather or wind, Also, use a large chamber to dampen sudden variations in its readings. Standard louvers, hoods, and direct openings are usually sized at 700 to 1500 fpm through the free area of the opening. Specify stormproof louvers approximately 50% larger than standard louvers to minimize the resistance of the extra rain breaks in the blades. Install flashings at the outside wall, and weep holes or a floor drain to carry away rain or melted snow entering the intake. In cold regions, a snow baffle may be required to direct fine snow particles to a low-velocity area below the dampers. At maximum airflow, overall resistance of the louver, dampers, and outside air intake duct should approximately equal the resistance of the return air systems. Construct relief openings in large buildings similarly tooutdoor air intakes butequip them with motorized or building pressure-operating backdraft dampers to prevent reversal of airflow caused by high wind pressures or building stack action when the automatic dampers are open. Treat self-acting dampers to prevent rattling. 5.8 REFERENCES ASHRAE. 1992. Handbook—Systems and Equipment. ASHRAE. 1993, ASHRAE Pocket guide for air conditioning, heating, ventilation, and refrigeration. ASHRAE, 1993. Handbook—F undamentals.Duct and Air Distribution Design 1989 ASHRAE Handbook, Fundamentals32.7 Duct Design 00001 | buy wo) (wu 600 = ») euy64.08 005 2002. stu 5 "ALUNYNO UY 2008 009 o +0 zo co ro 0 Lo FRICTION LOSS, PalmDuct Design ‘Table 7_Leakage as Percentage of Airflow'* — Leakage Ligon! —__Staie Pressure Pa__ Gist _Duct Surface’ “125 250500 750 _1000_ 1500 32.15 ‘2 1220-mm square louver with the frame mounted flush in the ‘wall, For the water penetration tests, the rainfalls 100 mm/h, no wind, and the water flow down the wallis 0.05 L/s per linear metre of louver width. Use Figure 11 for preliminary sizing of air intake and exhaust ra rT B87 sours Fora qeancs grea then S00 perlowves thes BoB Fiat gross lover openings are based on2im/e forcast ou RB ease uma oratquanitesot 2400 per louver Sod 133 St Geeter Fora quanti las than these reerto igure Thee , Serle presned on aper louver bans (es eah oer oa 2 gH Pater touver)to include each louver fame. Represenatne 1§ 3 M3 roduetlon un overs weve used In eablneg Fir tad Be M2 2 Miata usedinthat ana arbasedon ANCA snares 3S "he HE 12 Foctouvestargr than bS ms the ee areas areaveter shan D Gai Tis Tie 458. while for louvers less than 1.5 m the free areas are less 9f 12, 1 12 Ghanasm Unles specific lower dats ave analy, no louse 25 94 1 1S Relig nave ace area less than Om ideo coleioney G3 2 98D Hetreenof animate louvers posite or ouvers a loenca $23 35 3% grade win adjacent podesan trafic love face selcis - 2 Bo AS 8 TT ld at enced 05 mo 8 BE 27 23 21 system and Duct Noise % B31 33 Te Themajorsoucesot nis from air-conditioning stems are x. 1924 3.0 3.8 diffusers, grilles, fans, ducts, fittings, and vibrations. Chapter 42 5 v0 Ta TuT a7 Tae Sfthe IDE ASHRAE Honcbook Apptaion Scan sound 2 10 Os 10 14 17 4 LOUVERS* i Case aom tis than ODL sete Ts wes ok ian NOSE sect. u os of 08 a3 FiLreRs 20 03 04 OS 06 ee = e = Dry-type, extended-surface 7 «709 Talon ction oe oF Piers creda een) 8 os ne » a Rescate meta ers 8 _04_02_03_03_04 05 SRE Reus impingement 2s aetna raion fom AF ba iar mma I MoS Sa Sean i ieee ae TA eater cacing gece dc opens ron ai ceanes eee te ree ronan pe eawous Sees | aes ae ee eae ceerae ane HEATING COWS. ves sry ean wr ied yl ta ba eee clergy tee re ny ‘Spe wire fete tome das sytem Component Design Vc Peed bale feta dae ystem Component Design Velocities DenuMipiFviNG cons! 73 ‘ble @ summarize fae veloc for HVAC componenisin DEMUMIDIFYING coms’ _aie9 built-up systems. In most cases, the values are abstracted from AIR WASHERS‘ 1 ° pertinent chapters in the 1992 ASHRAE Handbook—Systems omer Refer ane data End Equipment final selection of the components shouldbe SNE sane toni based on data i these chapters or from manufacturers. ‘Louvers require special treatment since the blade shapes, angles, ‘and spacing cause significant variations in louver-free area and performance (pressure drop and water penetration). Selection and analysis should be based on test data obtained in accordance with AMCA Standard 500 (1989). This standard presents not only the pressure drop and water penetration test procedures, buta uniform ‘method for calculating louver-free area. Tests are conducted on asd on ssumptions presented in te. Abracied rom Chater 25, 192 ASHRAE Hendbook Systems and Equip “Rvetraced from Chaler 24, 1992 ASHRAE Hondbook-Systems end Eau ‘absiacte om Chapter 21, 192 ASHRAE Hondbook Systems ond Eau [Ktaced trom Char 19,1972 ASHRAE Hondbook Systems ond Equip.32.16 Parameters Used to Gxtablah Figure Intake Louver Exhaust Louver insur eee area 1220-00 square ech sector) se “6 4s Negigiole a Wiser penetration, Lin?) esethands) Maximum static pressure crop. Pa 35 a Fig. 11 Criteria for Louver Sizing, control for each of these sources. Sound control for terminal devices consists of selecting devices that meet the design goal ‘under all operating conditions and installing them properly so that no additional sound is generated. The sound power output of a fanis determined by the type of fan, airflow, and pressure Sound ‘control inthe duct system requires proper duct layout, sizing, and provision for installing duct attenuators, if required. The noise ‘zenerated by a system increases with both duct velocity and sys- {em pressure. Chapter 42 of the 1991 ASHRAE Handbook — Applications presents methods for calculating required sound attenuation. Testing and Balancing Each air duct system should be tested, adjusted, and balanced Detailed procedures are given in Chapter 34 of the 1991 ASHRAE Handbook—Applications. To properly determine fan total (or static) pressure from field measurements taking into account fan system effect, refer tothe Fan-System Interface section. Equation (38) allows direct comparison of system resistance to design cal- culations and/or fan performance data. It is important that the system effect magnitudes be known prior to testing. If necessary, use Equation (18) to calculate fan static pressure knowing fan total pressure (Equation (38)]. For TAB calculation procedures of ‘numerous fan system configurations encountered inthe field, refer (© AMCA Publication 203 (19906). DUCT DESIGN METHODS Duct design methods for HVAC systems, and exhaust systems conveying vapors, gases, and smoke are equal friction, static regain, and the method. The Industrial Exhaust System Duct Design section presents the design criteria and procedures for ‘exhaust systems conveying particulates. Equal friction and static 1993 Fundamentals Handbook (1) regain are nozoptimizing methods, while the T-method isa prac. tical optimization method introduced by Tsal (1988). “To assure that system designs are acoustically acceptable, noise generation stould be analyzed and sound attenuators and/or ‘acoustically lined duct provided where necessary: Dampers mi be installed throughout systems designed by equal friction, static regain, and the T-method, since inaccuracies are introduced inte these design methods by duct size round-off and theeffecton the total pressure loss calculations by close-coupled fitings. Equal Friction Method In the eqalfriction method, ducts are sized fora constant sure lose pe ani length. The shaded ates ofthe ftion char (Figure Sis hesugeested range of friction rate andar wlan When energy ou i high and installed uct work costs low ae Iretonrate designs more economical. For low enepy cost aed high duct cosa higher fiction rate ismore economical Afi tal sizing caiulate the total pressure loss forall uct sections, then resize seion to Balance pressure losses teach junction Static Regain Method ‘The objective of the static regain method is to obtain the same static pressure at diverging flow junctions by changing down. stream duct sizes, This design objective can be developed by re arranging Equation (7) and setting p; equal top, (neglect stack effect term). Thus « and Wi pts ove p oS) where Apis the total pressure loss from upstream of junction Ito ‘upstream of junction 2, of the terminal of section 2. Since Ap can be calculated, the immediate downstream duct size that satis- fies Equation (48) is determined by iteration. Equation (45) can be solved only when the downstream velocity is reduced, which may require the downstream duct size to be greater than the ‘upstream duct. If this solution is undesirable, Equation (44) may bbe used by maintaining the same duct size downstream as up- ‘stream to solve forthe static pressure at the next junction. ‘To start the design ofa system, a maximum velocity is selected for the root section (duct section upstream and/or downstream of a fan). In Figure 12, section 6s the root for the return air sub- system, Section 19 is the root for the supply air subsystem. The shaded area onthe friction chart Figure 5) isthe suggested range of air velocity. When energy cost is high and installed ductwork cost is low, a lower initial velocity is more economical. For low energy cost and high duct cost, a higher velocity is more econom- . All other sections, except terminal sections, are sized itera- tively by Equation (45). In Figure 12, terminal sections are 1, 2, 4,7, 8, M, 12, 15, and 16. Knowing the terminal static pressure requirements, Equation (44) is used to calculate the duct size of terminal sections. Ifthe terminal is an exit fitting rather than a register, diffuse, or terminal bor, the static pressure at the exitof the terminal section is zero. “The classical static regain method (Cartier 1960, Chun-Lun 1983, Shataloft 1966) is based on Equation (46), where R is the static pressure egain factor, and Ap, isthe static pressure regain between junctions. “EE - ey 46)Duct Design 32.21 FITTING LOSS COEFFICIENTS — ENTRIES 11 Duct Mounted in Wal (Hood, Nonenclosing, Flanged, and 1-4 Conic Converging Belmouth without End Wall, Round and Unftanged) (Idetehik 1986, Diagram 3-1) Reciangul General, entry has screen, us Fiting 67 to calculate screen esistance © ba” Te kK at i A){ YT L Rectangular: D = 2H +H), — & — 7 2D = 2HWAH + ud 0 0.002 001 00s 02 08 310 as =O 050 057 068 080 092 10 19) 002 050 051 052 055 04 O72 072 8, degrees 20005 050 0.50 050 050 0.50 _0.90 080 0203045609010 1580 180 0.96 0.93 0.90 0.85 0.80 0.72 0.64 0.57 0.50 0.93 086 0.80 0.73 067 0.60 0.56 052 0.80 080 0.67 0.55 046 O41 O41 0.43 0.46 0.50 048 0.45 0.30 0.21 0.17 0.21 0.28 038 0.50 0.46 027 0.18 0.14 0.13 0.19 0.27 037 0.30 032 0.20 0.14 O11 0.10 0.16 0.24 035 0.50 42 Smooth Converging Belmouth without End Wall (lelchik 1986, Diagram 3-4) Conical Converging Helnouth with End Wall, Round and Rectangular ietehik 1986, Digram $7) ory ® 001 002 00s 004 os ce 10087 0.74 061 0st 0.40 | D096 0.08010 0.12~—0.16 > 020 ream é 032 020 01S 000.06 08 > | ah Sd 1-3 Smooth Converging Bellmouth with End Ws Daam3.0) " a a dons 050 047 04s 045 041 040 04 Gat O46 O30 nna 7 cas 80S, 050 088 O81 O56 O52 O50 Ode Os es Oe (CoCo a SM car ocdoapetospcatititette 7 ——Os0_OM_037 _o3t__026_0.22_ 9405 099 G42 0135 030 025 023 028 035 943 O18 7D 005908 0.10 012 016 B02 is 930 way Sar Oa Oat OIE O25 O28 O4t O40 G0 05 0s boa OS dO OH SH bm Me Os om O31 ow 0032.22 1989 Fundamentals Handbook (S1) 1-6 Intake Hood (Udetehik 1986, Diagram 3 H 7 —— +6 t | i exits _ mS General. [fexit has.a screen, use Fitting 6-7 to calculate screen resist: +e} 24 EM Abra Round and Rectang elk 1986 Diagram ma nn Ode 01 02 03 04 0S 06 08 10 40 © 263 183 153 039 131 1.19 108 1.06 10 15132077 060 0.48 041 0.30 028 0.25 025 Uniform Velocity Distribution c=10 C, vates from 1.010 3.67. For details, consult Lele (1986 Diagram 11-1 2-2. Exit, Abrupt, Round and Rectangular, with End Wall (Idelchis 1986, Diagrams $2 and 5-4), hoods | Hood Shape: Round Odes. 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 140 a oy ese soseperst area C10 0.19 0.13 0.16 0.21 0.27 0.33 O43 053 0.42 148 Orifice, Sharp-Edged, Inlet Duc (Idetchik 1986; Diagrams 3-12, 3-14,and 419) 2.3. Exit, Duct Flash with Wall, Flow along Wall (deleik 1986, Diagedm 11-2) a py ys scaticemes NCDuet Design 32.23 Round eee - - Tp 05 18 20 30 40 50 60 80 10 1 14 © a 7 ee ee °. 50.14 0, 320.26 Wy, —10__1S_20 2.6 Exit, Rectangular, Two Sides Parallel, Diverging, Symmetrical Lt 1a 16 (deehik 1985, Diagram 11-6) rn ra 16 oss ia 17 a 09s 13 17 08310. Ls “Aspect - Ratio — coset azo — (HW) 6,40 0 20 <02 <9 1009812 18 osem/we2 120000092 19 10 LO 07sO8 us os20 <4 10 10 Y 13 16 6 ________ 0 © 10090 te 16 0, degrees _ 9 100.80 i417 nn ia fa 10080 4 MP ada, #8 130 «1008203 O13 2 050 O51 056 063 080 096 10 es tO 0820931 403 O38 048 063 076 091 10 @ 10 087 087 10 13 6032 034 0.41 056 0.70 084 096 5 Lo OR 080 0.9712 1010 080 0.7% __090__0.98 2-4. Exit, Round, Diverging (Idtehik 1986, Diagram 11-3) 2:7 Exit, Rectangular, with Wall, Two Sides Parallel, Symmetrical, Diverging (Idelchik 1986, Diagram S-10) @ % 8 Be ——_ = optimum ansle gas 10 20 30 49 50 68 88 grees @ 9035 25 2 18 16 IS 13 2 10 AJA, & 104 00S FH, 953 0.44 0.35 0M 0.28 0.25 0.24 0.22 0.20 0.19 0.19 2 036 033 037 05! 090 10 10 4 024 021 028 040 070 099 10 6 020 019 026 037 067 099 10 1 G1 016 024 036 048 099 10 st, Rectangular, Pyramidal, Diversng (etch eae ete oee omens cso tg 7 Has Rerreer Psrunil, Dieaiog QAR 12, 2S. Enit, Round, with End Wall Transition (Idetchik 1986, Diagram = optimum angle Diagram 115) 8 “4 6, Dis targer of 8, and 8,32.24 1989 Fundamentals Handbook (SI) 21 Exhaust Hood (detehik 1986, Diggram 11-46) 2.9 Enit, Rectangular, with Wall, Pyramidal, Diverging (Idechik 1986, Diagram 5) Poor design—should not be used (see Chi er 14, Figure 13) tip tt e205 03 038 Ga as 06 08 | = aaa « an cr S613 o_o80 070 065 a6 00 ose 0 Li a3 1039 30 4a $04 400 te 9 8 76 6 ss i E,_049 040 0130 026 023 0.21 0.19 O17 O16 0.15 118 12 Stackhead eth 1986, Diagram 1-23) 240 Ea Dare to Amostre tom 9° tow, Rect nord as toto cae Gace es ments 60, «10 | -f | 4 Ruosene ae 1E | , os 40 60 80 20 | 030 34 2224 21 20 | 5 2 | eracker 07s 22 22 Ves ts 1s 0-25 mm——}-—=] UPPER STACK ro 1a 1s "2042 12 12 TO DISCHARGE , rs 1s 12 men ch at poo 25 12 01 Ko 1010 i Round (-/D = 1.0) LD 09 1 J} Sane aD 03 04 05 06 For loss coefficient with screen at outlet see Note 2 Got 07 08 09) 4426 16Duet Design ELBOWS 341 Elbow, Smooth Radius (Die Stamped), Round (Lack A10) 1950, Ba 32.25 ar 016 038 ass ost Reynolds Number Correction factors: M/he Rex 1 2 3 « 6 § 0 =H Ky 140126 11914 1.081.061.0410 enon 0:7 tap _ Coefficients for 90° Eibows % ‘Ky 0 0.31 0.45 0.60 0.78 0.90 1.00 1.13 1.20 1,28 1.40 all * come 3:2. Elbow; 3, 4, and S-Pieces, Round (Locklin 1950, Fig. 10) L/D ° os La us 20 as ao snece senect eer eet 0790 dows G) +e No “t pes 078i — ; 304s 03302 as % fe ah One rox we — joo Anal Comeston Factor dl 1986, Diagram 61) co ieee @ 0 2% 3 4 60 75 9% 110 130 150 180 Ky 00.31 0.48 0.60 0.78 0.90 1.00 1.13 1.20 1.28 1.40 (90% Sharp Throat Radius Heel (-/W’ = 0.8) 3.3 Elbow, Mitered, Round (Idtchik 1986, Diagram 65) 7 Coe Kel as eh ont view Ly C= Keele32.26 Coefficients for 90° Elbows (C9) HW 1/W 028 05 O75 10 15 20 30 40 50 60 80 0513 13 12 12 10 ot 212 0.35 057 052 048 0.44 0.40 0.39 039 040 042 043 044 10 027 025 023 021 019 GiB O18 019 020 021 O21 LS 022 020 019 O17 OS ote O18 O15 O16 017 O47 20 020 018 O16 01S O14 O13 O43 O14 O14 O15 O15 Angle Correction Factor a0 2% 30 4 @ 75 9 0 130 150 180 Ky 0031 045 0.60 0.78 090 1.00 113 120 1.28 140, Reynolds Number Correction Factor (i Re x10 w 23 4 6 8 a oo OS 140 126 119 114 109 106 108 1010 3075 20 177 164 156 146 138 130 1s 10 3-6 Elbow, Miered, Rectangular (Idelchik 1986, Diagram 6-8) c HW - deg 025 05 075 10 15 20 30 40 50 60 80 20 008 008 0.08 0.07 007 007 006 0.06 0.05 O05 005 30 018 017 017 O16 O15 O15 0.23 043 012 012 O11 45 038 037 0.36 034 033 031 028 0.27 0.26 025 024 60 060 059 0.57 055 052 049 046 043 O41 039 028 75 089 087 084 O81 0.77 073 067 063 O61 O58 037 913 13 12 12 11 11 098 092 089 085 083 Reynolds number corrections factors Rex‘ 1 2 3 4 6 #8 0 2m Ky 140126 119114 1.091.061.0410 3-7 Elbow, Smooth Radius with Splitter Vanes, Rectangular (Lacklin 1950, Eq. 10; Madison and Parker 1936), ee srrten vane C= Kee Ro Rice T where Ky = angle factor (Gee Fitting 3.1 for values) 1989 Fundamentals Handbook (SI) Corfticiens for ebows with I spliter vane (C.9) tt AIW 1iW_CR 025 OS 10 1S 10 30 40 50 60 70 80 (008-055 0362 026 020 022 025 0.28 0.3 037 ot 045 048 0-51 010 040 0450 017 013 O41 0.12 043 O13 016 017 019 020 024 815 065 0507 0.12 009 008 008 0.08 009 0.10 0.10 O11 O1T vit 20.0.7 0580 0.09 0.07 006 0.05 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 007 0.07 c= 025 075 0388 008 0.05 004 O14 O08 004 0.05 005 005 005 oc# 030 080 0613 0.06 004 003 003 0.03 0.03 0.03 003 004 004 0.2 “Two Splitter Vanes R= RICR Ry > RVUCR = BCR vehere a throat radius ® E Ry = splitervane #1 radius l Ry = spliter vane #2 radius Ct = "CURVE RATIO" (Galues from table below) K, = angle fictor (Gee Fitting 34 for values) Coefficients for eloows with 2 splitter vanes (C:) ma IW r/W CR 425 0S 10 1S 20 30 40 50 60 70 40 (005 055 0362 126 020 022 025 0.28 032 037 O41 O48 048 6 10 0.60 0450 017 043 O11 012 013 O15 O46 017 019 020 015 065 0507 0.12 0.09 0.08 008 0.08 009 0.10 010 0.11 O11 020 070 0880 609 0.07 0606 005 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 00° 0.07 0 025 0.75 0585 (08 005 0104 004 0. 0.04 0.05 005 005 0.05 Oc 030_080 0613 (06 0.04 003 003 003 0.03 0.03 0.03 004 0.04 0.2 Te per ane Shins nes Sik LT] =Io~ Ry = RICR = RICR By = RUCR = RICR boat See ‘throat adius Ry = splitervane M radius Ry = spliter vane #2 radius Ry = spltervane #3 radius ch = “CURVE RATIO" (alues from table below) Ky = angle factor (Gee Fiting 3. for values Coefficients foretow with 3spitervanes(C,") 7 BIW W/W CR 025 OS 10 1S 20 30 40 (005 055 0467 G11 0.0 012 O13 O14 046 ak 049 021 022 02 0,10 0.60 0349 007 0.05 006 0.06 006 007 0.07 0.08 008 008 OiDuct Design 32.27 3:8 Elbow, Mitered, with Single-Thickness Vanes, Rectangular (Razll 1978) HW, 08 % ae ost 1 1 1017 La 09s 050 oka fom 4001S tt as 076 07266 131069 06s ads Reynolds number correction factor Rex 1 2 3 4 6 § 1 >i a Ku 140126 11916109106 1.08 10 ~S Dimensions, mm 3-11 Elbows, 90% Z-Shaped, Rectangular (ldlchik 1986. Diagram eu) + When extension of allng ges nt provided fo this ane. loses ae approx: ‘mately uncharged flor snae elbows, bu erase considera fr elbows eis 3.9 Elbow, Mitered, with Double-Thickness Vanes, Rectangular (Rozel 1974) Jom << Boe Cm Kale! EMBOSSED WANE RUNNER (Cocffiiens fer W7H = 10 L/H 0 04 06 O8 10 12 14 16 18 20, p> @O BRE TgEs oe pusw-on vane pune -«-L/H 24-28 «32-40 50 60 70 9.0 100 = c S23 373332 3429 29 28 27 For W/H valws other than 1.0, apply the following factor W/H 025 050 075 10 1S 20 30 40 60 80 Dimensions, i anoraWart beige am ee K 110 107 104 10 095 0,90 983 078 0.72 070 No rs S10 1520 Remarks Reynolds Number Correction Factor 1 50 40 027 022 019 017 Embossed Vane = Rext0* 1 2 3 4 6 & Bia Runner 2 $0 40 0.33 0.29 026 0.23 Push-On Vane Runner 3 50 55 0.38 0.31 027 0.24 Embossed Vane 342 Combined 90° Etbows Laing in Different Planes, Rectangular Runner (delehik 1986, Diagram 6-11) 4 MS 80 026 021 0.18 0.6 Emboseed Vane Runner 3410 Eibow, Variable Inlet/Outlet Areas, Rectangular (Idlchik 1986, Diagram 6-4) nat C.= Kula! C= Rul32.28 1989 Fundamentals Handbook (SI) Coefficients for Square Ducis « uw 0 08 06 08 10 12 14 46 18 20 LD G12 24 29 33 34 34 M4 33 32M edeg 0a LW 24 28 3240 $0 60 10 90 100 = 15020 042 0.60 0.78 0.98 a2 3230 29 28 27 23 24 23 30 040 068 088 16 120 Se s2 45° 060 106 020 123 130 6 10s 138 137 138 Las Apply the following factor for th 0 7S 130 188 146 130129 HIW 025 050 075 10 15 20 30 40 60 80 90 100 167 140 13) K_110 107 1.04 10 095 090 083 078 072 0.0 - _ 1D Reynolds Number Correction Factor deg “Rw Rexw' 1 2 3 4 6 8 10 3 is TOC Tas To Ky 140126 119 11.09 1.06 108 10 301 sae 1a 45 0T 130 ee ss 33 Offset, $ Shaped (Gooseneck), Rectangular and Round Eee (ielehik 1986, Diagram 6-16) 901701761828 = offset toss coefficient Cio © single elbow loss coetFcient (se Fittings 3-1, 3-2, and 3-5) 3:14 Offset S-Shaped in Two Planes 90° Apart, Rectangular and Round (etch 1986, Diagram 6-16) ake here offset loss coefficient = single elbow loss coeicent (ee Fittings 3-1, 3-2, and 3:5) 8. ° 20 920 e.deg 10 150 90190Duct Design 315 Elbows (, 45°, Smooth Radius, Rectangular, Arranged to Go ‘Around an Obsiruction (SMACNA 1981, Table 148) Di be Tr Le Ve m/s 4 6 8 10 2 oie a oe oS ls TRANSITIONS 41 Transition, Round (Idelcik 1986, Diagrams 5-2 and 5-22) 32.29 42 Transition, Rectangular, Two Sides Paral etch 1986, Diagram 53)° |, Spmmetecal oo 8 6 4, degrees - AJA 15203050 120150180 0.06 0.26 0.27 0.40 0.56 0.71 086 1.00 099 0.98 0.98 0.1 024 (26 036 053 0.69 0.82 093 0.93 092 091 025 0.17 C19 0.22 0.42 0.60 0.68 0.70 0.69 0.67 066 05 0.14 C13 0.45 0.24 0.35 0.37 0.38 0.37 0.36 0.35 r0 9 © 0 0 0 6 6 OO 2 023 620 020 0.20 0.24 O28 054 0.78 10 11 4 OBI O6t 064 O64 OBE 11 28 44 57 66 6 i 18 14 14 16 20 25 660 3 48 5050 $0 65 80 19 78 ely | | e+] {i G 4, degrees Add: 10 _15_20_30_45_60_90_120_150_180_ 0.60 0.84 0.88 0.88 O88 0.88 0.88 0159 0.76 0.80 983 9.84 9.83 0.83 946 O61 0.68 264 9.63 9.62 0.62 032 033 033 032 031 030 0.30 @ 0 9 0 9 0 a 0.20 022 0.24 0.48 0.72 0:96 10 064 088 11 27 43 $6 66 L420 025 65 Wh IS 065 $019 2» Vo a a 8, degrees AJA 180) W120 150 0.06 0.26 027 0.40 0.56 0.71 0.86 1.00 0.99 0.98 098 0.1 024 026 0.36 053 0.69 082 0.93 0.93 0.92 091 0.25 0.17 019 0.22 0.42 0.60 068 0.70 0.69 0.67 0.65 OS 0.14 013 O15 024 0.35 0.37 O38 0.37 0.36 0.35 roo 9 0 9 9 0 6 6 2 0.23 020 0.20 0.20 0.24 0.28 0.54 0.78 10 1.1 4 081 064 O64 O68 O88 11 28 44 57°66 6 18 14 14 1a 20 25 66 10 13 15, 1050 so so so 6s 80 9 2 37 8 44 Transition, Rectangular, Pyramidal Idelehlk 1986, Diagram sa32.30 c 4, degrees Os. O54 0.53 0.65 0.50 0533 064 036 045 0.52 0.21 025 0.20 0 0 0 0 21 020 022 02 0s 088 1.1 14 20 25 506s a0. on 0 07 075 08 033 0 049 27 os a i G 0 0.88 084 0.82 033 ° 7 43 0 2» 150 0.95 089 0.66 0.68 033 032 a 0 099 56 65 Bs 78 180 0.98 ot | 5 degrees AVA, $00 014 0.15 0.20 0.25 020 0.25 021 2 4 6 0.24 030 0.4 | 4-6 natn peng to 526) a 9 180 030 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.30 0.34 045 052 0.58 0.62 0.64 0.64 030 042 033 06 072 0.78 0.79 0.79 0640.75 0-84 (detchik 1986, Diagram for d,> Avant HD ex 10-4 7D 20 30 ' 2 3 s 1 2 3 5 1 1 5 1 1 2 3 5 1 1 2 3 5 1 1 2 3 s 1989 Fundamentals Handbook (SI) o o os 12 5 046 0.48 0.50 0.35 0.70 094 1 046 047 0.49 053 064 082 | 046 0.47 O48 050 058 0.71 6 048 0.46 086 O48 0.51 057 0, 04S 0.45 0.46 046 O48 0. 0.45 0.46 0.46 0.47 0.49 033 041 043 0.46 0.51 0.66 0.90 O41 043 048 048 0.59 0.78 Oat 042 04s 046 0.54 0.67 O41 042 042 043 047 053 O41 O41 0.41 082 0.48 0.46 Oai O41 0.82 043 045 049 031-033 0.35 0.40 058 0.79 031 032 034 038 0.49 O47 031 032 033 036 043 057 030 031 0.31 033 036 0.42 030 031 031 031 033 0.36 030 031 031 032 034 038 0.19 0.21 0.23 028 0.43 0.68 0.19 020 022 026 0.37 O55 0.19 020 021 024 O31 o4s 0.19 019 020 0.21 024 030 DIS 0.19 019 O19 021 O24 D8 0.19 0.19 0.20 022 026 2.07 0.09 0.12 0.17 0.21 0.56 2.07 0.09 0.10 0.14 0.25 043 207 0.08 0.09 0.12 0.20 0.33 2.07 0.07 0.08 0.09 0.13 O18 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.08 0.10 0.12 9.07 0.07 0.08 0.08 0.11 0.15 9.01 0.03 0.05 0.10 0.25 0.30 9.01 0.62 0.04 0.08 0.19 037 8.01 0.02 0.03 0.06 0.13 027 ‘0 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.06 0:12 0 001 0.01 0.01 0.03 0.06 00.01 0.01 0.02 0.04 0.08 30 os O68 02 037 1a vo os Osa oat 0.86 12 om 071 Jsggune se Gfor A, < Aang cD GlorAycAvandD Re x 10-4 ' LD a 1s 0.28 028 028 on 0.26 0.25 025 035 0.19 019 019 0.18 0.12 012 1, oat 027 027 027 025 028, 03s 0.25 Oe os O18 os ot on out ‘0.05 0.05 0.05 140.08 0.01 oot 001 ° 14 12 seelegeglesDuet Design 32.31 47 Transition, Rectangular to Round, Stepped, Conical (Idelcik 1986, Diagram 4:9) oe o8 0710-10-10 09-09-09 O1 "021 “04s 087 -0st -032 ~os ~o3e 2 31 “or “00s “ale “ea “oa -o2e 3 te 02 “OS “aus “eae “eae “oon Nb te oe $012 oat ony ats an po ee oon Mf GS te ae os ) te jo Ge ae am Gas oar oo 83M te ae om on fe om 42 13) om oa oo Sa te oe on L to soe os Main. C. AA, a; 02030406 08 oo 0 @ 00 a0 Targa ci om om ats 04s ate at on AUAy LD 2-03) O01 013 019 02s 037 029 ae 01000045 6)_90_120_ 150180 03 — 11 -025 -001 010 022 0.30 0.35 01 0085 O46 043 O47 O40 O38 037 038 Dad Oar OM 3 TSS OH TRL G1 OR Oa Os Gos, Oae O42 036 039 030 028 O31 O36 Ot oes Sf 22 787 7030-0; 07 046 ae Ors Oe 099 O32 028 023 Ot 026 039 049 ose «OS 3S TA 7020-03390, Oa ts o1” Oe 036 030 023 019 049 028 00 aan ae = «98 34 734 TE 704° “pay gee 0a Gis Gas O34 02s 048 O13 4 oat 029 037 ce = 97 Tye® TEE TPO THE O30 oOds oe 03° Gas O31 O22 O46 O13 O43 020 028 037 ose OE TID “AE W287 -18 090-04) ots 04 _Oae 025 017 012 040 041 019 027 ossoue = 99 T2823 TEES 10S? OSE 3S 0.035 040 0.8 036 035 033 032 0.33 0.5 0.37 0.40 0.05. 0.40 036 033 029 0.26 024 0.27 O31 0.35 040 see ase eae oe oe ay $2 Wye. 4S, Comvering, Round (ldelehik 1986, Diagram 7-2) 0.1" O40 0:31 026 020 0.17 0.14 020 0.26 0.33 0.40 0.15 0.40 0.30 022 0.46 0.13 012 0.18 0.5 0.32 0.40 . a 03 040 0.17 O49 0.14 O11 O.11 0.18 0.25 032 0.40 2 ey ae 016 0.40 0.22 0.44 0.10 0.09 0.10 0.16 0.24 0:32 0.40 = ee = 05 00025 0.30 0.28 0.27 0.25 0.24 0.24 0.25 0.26 027 0.30 0.05. 0.30 0.27 0.24 0.21 0.19 0.18 0.20 0.23 0.26 0.30, 0.075 030 0.25 0.21 0.18 0.15 0.14 0.17 021 025 0.30, any 0.41 030 0.23 0.19 0.5 0.12 0.11 015 019024030 4 Lg 0.15 0.30 0.22 0.16 0.12 0.09 009 0.13 018 024.030 As = Ac 0.3 030 0.20 0.14 0.10 0.08 0.08 0.13 0.18 0.24 0.30, 0.6 0:30 0.16 0.11 0.08 0.07 0.07 0.12 0.17 0.23 0:30 ALA. 08 0.025 0.15 0.14 0.13 0.13 0.12 0.12 0.12 043 O14 0.15 O/B 0a 020304 0G OK 1D 0.05. O.15 0.13 0.12 O.11 0.10 0.09 0.10 0.12 0.13 015, 0 710 = 10-10 0.80 0.90 0.90 090 (0.075 0.15 0.13 0.10 0.09 0.08 0.07 0.08 0.10 0.13 0.15 gy ge O45 086 ~080 ~0s2 ~0s3 —033 OOS 0.12 0.10 0.07 0.06 0.05 0.07 0.10 0.12 0.15 «S254 02 ~Ole ~121 ~023 ~025 DS O15 0.11 0.08 0.05 0.05 0.04 0.07 009 0.12 015 93, ko. G. 028 06-002 03 OS 0.10 0.07 0.05 0.08 0.04 0.07 0.09 0.12915 ae 32 tT os? ozs ok OS 06 O15 0.08 0.05 0.04 0.03 0.04 0060.09 0.12 0.15 93, a SOs 0330S 02 06 2 70 «30 os ost 01st a 07 4% 923912086 0.3903 08 5691S 066039036 , 09 71s 62180408 JUNCTIONS (Tees, Wyes, Crosses) lo 19 74 2007s om 02 5:1 Wye, 30% Converging (Idelehik 1986, Diagram 7-1) & ‘54 Wye, 305 Converging (delehik 1986, Diagram 7-1) al 0 0 0 0 0 ol 016 017 7a 02 027 027 029 O31 Ook 020 028 032 040 O12 008 026 036 O41 =049 -017 046 030 040 Toe? “04s 004 020 033 ci Toss “02s os 02s 21-13) “ass 0.17 0.06 6-19 “088-090-018 3226 lia “077-0832.32 1989 Fundamentals Handbook (SI) 5-3 Tee, Converging, Round (Idelchik 1986, Diagram 7-4) —__ Brame jy 00 AA eo 4,4, 02 04 06 08 10 12 1A 16 18 20 4 ae! ae Branch, Cy —— 001 020304 06 08 0 - 10 = 10 -10 -090 -090 -0.90 -0.90 y On we ok le ey 4 0238 08 an “am “on OTE 2S Se eee a 92 2 10 0m 02 04 02 16 08S ae W439 -13 —17 38 22 oe 5) eo ows os) ag a 0B oo a te wk ayy We eee 10 101 26 2 40 21 a on 0s ams a — OS ME 0 01 a2 oF ae 08 O86 OF OF OD Id WTS GC, 0 0.16 0.27 038 0.46 0.52 057 059 0.60 0.59 0.55 a a 54 Wye.30¢Comveing Round, Cone Maia Sens 197) th 38 BE a 5-5 Wye, 45% Converging, Round, Conical Main (Sepsy 1973) Branch, C, Kae AL 2/0, cb ck fe BO OBO BO aa ea oa oan 8Duct Design Branch. AA 20/0, A.A, 02 04 06 08 10 12 16 G 2,/0, G2 04 06 08 10 12 14 16 18 20 OS Gh of ose ois ena 5.6. Tee, Converging, Rectangular (Idelehik 1986, Diagram 7-1) 32.33 Main. C.. Q,/0, 02 03 04 05 06 5-7 Comerging, Round Tap (o Rectangular Main (SMACNA 981 ‘able 90) m/s 01 a2 as 06 e663 $5 O13 92 OIE 130 19 340 288 FS, 0493 $58 36-49 a1 923 060 127 206 278 For main coefficient (C,). see Fiting 53 15.8 Tee, Comergng, Reclangular Main and Tap ‘SMACNA 1981, ‘Table 69D) Ande neds | rin) od ~ Soy” AA, AVAL Ava, 05 10 os Branch Cs a AL 270, —_ Bench, aoa) Given 93 edo 06 07 8889 aa woe oN, 8 Sak Bk ak th be m/s Oi 0203 04 OS 96 oe go gk ye oe BP 3 me ie <6 W758 -53 —03 033 103 0 te ak CH AE OR TR 8, GP aR Sh bh 36 <@ —21_02 067 107 166 poi ER BR fy SS Se as Gm _Formaine ee Fine32.34 59 Converging, Rectangular Main and Tap (45° Entry) (SMACNA. 1981, Table 6-9F) t F 1989 Fundamentals Handbook (SI) We 2 oa of OE 1D a TA 18 Te Ga 10 084 vst oat 027 017 0.2 012 O14 018 027 5-12 Tee, Diverging, Round, with 90° Elbow, Branch 90° to Main ones 1969, Fig. 17) 1 = 025 6.25mi, A ~—+|| U |]—=« ©) aA, AVA, 0 AoA Branch, C5 Branch 7) WW, 0 02 4 06 08 10 12 1a Te 18 20 a rr MOOR WS skye 30 UE WS LON 130 195 250-303 _Formaln os coe (C).se ig $23 SoS 28 ON oh ote tie ts tor dan 38 For main coefficient (C.,), see Fiting $3. 5-10 Tee, Diverging, Round, Conical Branch (Jones 1969, Fig. 12) WV, 0 02 04 06 0. 16 18 20 fon 1.0 O85 0.74 0.62 0.52 0.42 0.36 0.32 0.32 0.37 0.52 For main loss coefficient (C,,), see Fiting 523 5-11 Wye, 45°, Diverging, Round, Conieal Branch (Jones 1969, Fig. 14) 5.13 Tee, Diverging, Round, with 45° Elbow, Branch 90°to Main Glones 1969, Fig. 18) e—| —e AA, ranch Vv, 0 02 G4 06 08 10 12 1a Te 20 $27 6 Co 10 132 151 1.60 1.65 1.74 1.87 2022 For main loss coetficent(G,,), see iting $23. 5-14 Tee, Diverging, Round (Conteal Branch), with 45° Elbow, Branch 90° to Main (ones 1969, Fig. 19) | B For te geometry, see Fitting 5-10 ch VW, 0 02 04 06 08 10 12 14 16 18 20 E55" _1.0 0.94 0.38 0.86 0.80 0.82 0.84 0.87 0.90 0.95 1.02 For main loss coef ieient (G,). see Fitting 523.Duct Design 5.15 Wye, 45°, 1969, Fig. 3) } WV, 0 02 04 06 O12 14 16 | Eu 1.00188 0.77 0.66 0.65 0469 0.73 0.86 1.18 For main loss coefficient (G,). see Fitting $23. 5-16 We, 45°, Diverging, Round (Conia ] Branch 90° to Main Jones 1969, Fig. 20 2 | For wye geometry, see Fitting 511 AnA Vv, 0 02 04 06 08 10 12 14 | For main loss coefficient (C,,), see Fitting 5:23. 5:17 Wye, 45°, Diverging, Conical Main and Branch, with 45° Elbow, Branch 90° fo Mala (Udelehik 1986, Diagram 7-19) Round, with 6° Elbow, Branch 90°to Main (ones ranch), with 0° Elbow, 16 18 2, 1.0 0.82 0.63 0.52 0.45 0.42 0.41 0.80 O41 0.48 0.86, 32.35 Branch Wg¥, 02 04 06 0.7 08 09 10 41 12 Ep 0.36 050 0.52 0.50 0.51 0.82 056 061 0.68 WV 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 Ge 08 Wi 14 18 22 26 31 37 42 Main v/v, 02 04 06 08 10 12 14 16 18 20 E" 0.14 06 0.05 0109 018 0.30 0.86 0.64 0.84 10 5-18 Tee, Diverging, Round, with 60° Elbow, Branch 45° to Main (lomes 1969, Fig. 22) a % | = Branch 5.19 Tee, Diverging, Round (Conical Branch), with 60° Elbow, Branch 48°10 Main ones 1969, Fig. 23) v. —| For tee geometry see Fitting 5-10, AHA, 0 03 04 06 O8 10 12 14 16 18 20 10 0.95 0.90 0.86 0.81 0.79 0.39 0.81 0.86 0.96 1.10 For main loss coefficient (C,), see Fitting 5-23 wv, 15.20 Wye, 45°, Diverging, Round, with 30° Elbow, Branch 45°10 Main (ones 196, Fig. 2),32.36 Branch WV, 0 02 04 06 08 10 12 14 16 18 20 Eig 10 0.84 0.72 0462 0.54 0.50 0.56. 0.71 092 1.22 1.66 main loss coefficient (C,), see Fitting $23. 5.21 Wye, 45°, Diverging, Round (Conical Branch), with 30° Elbow, Branch 48° Main Jones 1969, Fig. 24), Ss For wye geometry, see Fiting -11 AA, 1989 Fundamentals Handbook (SI) 5.23 Wye, Diverging, Rectangular and Round (detchik 1986, grams 7-1Sand 7-17) o= m0 AVA, O1 02 03 04 08 06 07 08 09 08 0.75 055 040 028 O21 016 OS 0.16 019 07 0.72 051 0.36 025 O18 OS O16 020 026 06 069 0.46 0.31 0.21 0.17 0.16 020 028 0.39 OS 065 041 026 019 0.18 022 02 O87 0.67 04 039 033 021 020 027 040 082 092 13 03 055 028 024 038 07613 20 30 4 02 040 026 058 13 25 41 61 86 IT W/V, 0 02 04 06 08 10 12 14 16 18 20 Cy" 1.0 0.93 0.71 035 0.46 0.42 0.42 0.44 0.47 054062 01 028 15 43 83 150 2 SS TS or main loss coefficient (C,,), see Fiting 5-23, Fee main oss on ase ‘5.22 Tee, Diverging, Rectangular (Idecbik 1986, Diagram 7-21) Branch, Ce 2/0, Avs 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 08 0.78 062 049 0.40 0.34 031 032 035 040 07 0.77 059 047 038 034 032 035 041 0.50 06 0.4 056 0.44 037 035 036 043 054 0.68 OS 071 052 O41 O38 0.40 O45 059 078 10 04 0.66 0.47 0.40 043 084 069 095 13. 17 Be, 03 066 048 052 073 12 18 27 37 49 a 02 056 056 10 18 32 49 71 96 130 ste a 0} 060 21 5193 wo = Branch G,, A A, 2/0, ~ A, A, 01 02 03 04 0S 06 07 08 09 025 0.25 055 0.50 060 O85 12 18 31 44 60 0.33 0.25 035 035 050 080 13 20 28 38 50 OS 0S O62 048 040 040 O48 0.60 O78 11 15. ra 16 067 0.5 052 040 032 030 034 O44 062 0.92 Branch, C 2/0, 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 08 083 0.71 062 056 052 050 053 0.60 0.68 07 082 069 061 056 054 0.84 0.60 0.70 0.82 06 081 068 060 058 058 O61 O72 087 11 05 079 066 061 062 O68 0.76 094 12 15 04 076 065 065 074 089 11 1a 18 23 080 0.75 089 12 18 26 35 46 60 03 40 03 044 0.38 038 O41 052 O68 092 12 02 0.77 0% 16 23 40 60 #3 10 10 10 067 055 046 0.37 032 029 029 030037 1 10 39 52 100 ~~ = ee 133 10 070 060 0531 0.42 034 028 0.26 0.26 0.29 20 1.0 060 052 0.43 0.33 024 0.17 0.15 0.17 021 Main, C., _ AL A, 10, AA, 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 AVA, 04 02 03 09 025 0.25 -.01 =.03 -.01 008 0.13021 0.29 038046 08 095 092 0.92 14 0330.25 00s 0 -o2 —o1 o02008 01602403 9 O95 ood ove 16 OS 05 -03 -.06 —0s 0 0.06012019027035 Og os Oot to 20 06705 0.08 —"02 ‘04 93 ~\01 008 0.12 0.23 037 Hq 3S 10 05 0.72 048 0.28 0.13 0.05 dos 0.09 018 030 3 36 HO 10-02 —04 08 = [01 0.06 0.13 022 0.30 038 & es 13010 010 9.01 03-01 003 0.10 0.20 0.30, 1 20 1.0 0.62 _qA8_023 0.20.05 0.05 0.06 0.10 020 a3 =Duct Design Mai va C.." 040 0.52 0.26 030 0.14 010 006 002 5.24 Diverging Wye, Rectangel (ldelehik 1986, Diagrams 7-16 and 1510 90°and 4, = 4, + A, Branch, C.. 8, mH deg 0.1 0.2 0.3 04 05 06 08 1.0 12 14 16 18 20 15 081 0.65 0.51 0.38 0.28 0.20 0.11 0.06 0.14 0.30 0.51 0.76 1.0 30 0.84 0169 0.56 0.44 0.36 0.26 0.19 0.15 0.15 0.30 051 0.76 1.0 45 0.87 0.74 063 0.54 0.45 0.38 0.29 0.24 0.23 0.30 051 0.16 10 60 0.90 0.82 0.79 0.66 0.59 0.53 0.43 0.36 0.32 0.39 051 0.16 10 K 0 01 02 03 04 OS 06 08 10 o VV. 01 0203 02 1.00 04 Lor 107 06 14 110 108 os is mR 13 10 130 138 120 12 1.26 12146 1s 4s 131 139 tas 14170 182 165 51 156 164 16 193 206 200 185 130. 1.96 182006217 210 213 2.06 198 for main coeficient (C), see Fitting $23, 5-26 Tee, Diverging, Rectangular Main to Round Tap (Conical) owe 1980, Korst 1950) #10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10-10 10 Taw Maia, C., - Bae 1800 » Banh . ava, WV, 0a 080 018 10434 % “ei wea as Og a ee tot o 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 10 1.0 —Formain coef‘icient (C..,). see — o1 081 O81 Om ost ost ott 02 06s 064 © 064064 © O64 0.64 527 Tee, Divertng, Rectangular Man, and Tap 45° Entry) 03 08 050 082 052850 O80 (SMACNA 19h, Tale 6-0) O4 036 036 Oa) Oaks? Oe @S 025023 030 028.2702, 06 016 oe 023020 tse 0% 00 oor 017 O40 O.0T ae 0 a cS ye be wel 12 0.07 0.07 0.36 021 0.16 0.07 * t 4 0303907) 089 oss I 16 0.90 0.90 La 12 - = L 4 beige ie ae 2 f=] [kw 2003232 Recommended! 5525 Tee, Diverging, Rectangular Man o Round Tap (SMACNA be 198i, Table ese). 1 = 0.2807, 25mm min, ve.0e vee Branch, Ga add a lg | YY 0443030408 06 0708 09, y T y 02 08) 04 O81 079 06 077 07 0.70 08 O78 073 00 0.66 10 078 098 08s 0.79 0.74 12080 1 116 1.23103 086 14 119 122 136 129 156 0.28 092 Ne 13s 1a 18s 1159 18 150 131 109 HB 14s 150 175 174 192 234 Ves 14017 “or perormance Su, tee SMIACNA. (19)32.38 5.28 Tee, Diverging, Rectangular Main, and Tap" (SMACNA 1981, 1989 Fundamentals Handbook (SI) 5.30 Tee, Diverging, Rectangular Main and Tap, with Damper ‘Table 100) (SMACNA 1981, Table 6-10R) vere vos LS * * Meee Poor; should not be used” A= A, A= A, - Branch, Co Branch, Coy _ 0/0. _ 00. 02 03 04 0S 06 0.7 09 VY, 01 02 03 04 0S 06 07 08 09 02 058 o1 04 067 068 1.03 0.05, 06 078 076 075 1211.17 08 088 098 081 101 1401.30 127 10 12 108 1.08 148 1.29. 161 1.68 147 1.66 12149 148 140 US 190 191 201 190 228 220 1.95 14 210 221 225 229 232 248 253 228 213 2.99 281 2.09 220 16 272 330 284 3.09 330 3.19 329 3.16 254 2.64 309 3.72 248 221 2.29 2.57 18 342 458 365 3.92 420 415 414 410 4.05 For main coefficient C,,) 2 Fiting 523. ‘For performance study See SMACNA (198), For main coticient (ee Fiting 531 ‘or performance sth ke SMACNA (987), 5.29 Tee, Diverging, Rectangular Main and Tap (45° Entry), with S31 Tee, Diverging, Rectangular, with Extractor (SMACNA 1981, Damper SMACNA 1981, Table 6-10P), Table 6108) e Mee — Poor; should not be use Yee Poor; should not be used AHA AnA, _ _ Branch, Cp = 0.25 W,75 mm ain, —_—_Bramehe Gy W/o, WN, 0103 030405 06 07 08 09 Branch, Cy 02 040 Js 04 062 068 ie ie. 06 074 O80 O82 WY. 04 0.2 1 09 08 099 110 095 090 02 061 10 148 12 1a) 124 12 04 046 061 06 043 050 0.54 08 039 043 062 053 0 0346 037 0.77 073 0.68 2 037 06: 08S 098 107 O43 © 08? O71 Loe 146 Hs 036 118 6 O89 108 128 130 169 209 181 Kg 133 134 204 178 190240277 For main coefficient (,,) 5 Fiting 331 ‘For performance study see SMACNA (198). 12191 133 143 15215564 14247 167 170 204 186 198 247 3a7 240 238 253 231 281 343 3.28 14385337 259 3.23 309 303 330.374 ant Mai Vv, 02 04 06 O8 10 12 14 16 18 ©," 003 00% 07 012 013 014 027 030 0.25 ‘or peormance study SMACNA (987)Duct Design 32.39 5-32 Symmetrical Wye, Dovetail, Rectangular (Ideleik 1986, S34 Wye (Double) 45¢ Rectangular and Round (ldctchik 1986, im 7-24) Diagram 7-27) AAO AWA, 0.50 10. Cass Ca 023 oo Diverging AAO AgIA, 0.50 10 Cosa C, 0.0 02s 5.33 Wye, Rectangular and Round (Idelchik 1986, Diagram 7.30) 304 05 06 0.7 08 09 10 02 “oer 02 aa co eee Te : = 1B 8 oB as 8 deg 00. .2 0.3, 05 06 0.7 0.8 1.0 “Doma -is “1s a0 010 at aot ons amr te Ge ou om on e cul ig ia Tas Laem ea on th te ts Shoe an $ 4s 13 — 9) 55 16 090 086 07 13 16 20 23 30-2 O08 oN 02° 03° 04) O44 049 031 018 0 fo is torn nu 042 84 O46 os Os Om 0 F “Fe 011 036 046 053 os 056 052 084 038 018 0 30 O84 O49 056 Oat O38 O26 019 DIS 310 19 Oy oat ust ws ox os use oat 0s Om O 45 O87 074 O68 54 048 O38 O29 O28 a 050 08 0% dus 099 033 08) O36 oe ta fo 10 0a to to 1a to 4a 10 10" 10 Diverging Flom: Ls Fiting 5:23