Elindra,+6+Rivera+Hal+48 54
Elindra,+6+Rivera+Hal+48 54
Corresponding Author:
George M. Rivera,
Nueva Ecija University of Science and Technology,
Gen. Tinio Street, Cabanatuan City, Philippines
Email: mgeorge.rivera@gmail.com
1. INTRODUCTION
Clinical Learning Environment (CLE) is clearly defined in the nursing framework as an interacting
network of variables inside the clinical context that impacts students’ learning outcomes. CLE has five
components namely: pedagogical atmosphere on the ward, supervisory relationship, leadership style,
premises of nursing, and role of the nurse teacher [1].
Students' exposure to clinical environment plays a huge role in the teaching-learning mechanism.
Research has found out that learning environments is regarded as one of the fundamental elements that
influence the aptitude of students [2].
However, newly graduated nurses with lacking nursing training are afraid to make mistakes in a life-
threatening situation [3]. The lack of opportunity to perform clinical practice is the biggest problem in terms
of the confidence of student nurses to perform core clinical skills. Therefore, enhanced educational strategies
and knowledge applications should be utilized to increase confidence and knowledge to perform clinical
skills and their competence in utilizing nursing process.
In addition, a research study done in Oman on student nurses' satisfaction with and effectiveness of
the learning experience found that satisfaction with the CLE sub-dimensions was highly essential and had a
positive relationship with the overall clinical learning environment [4]. In contrast, a study found that the
function of the clinical teacher in clinical practice had the lowest mean rate [5].
It has been shown that students who study in a supportive learning environment are more inspired,
engaged, and have higher overall learning potential. Students, on the other hand, studying in bad settings with
unpleasant, noisy, and full of distractions, will find it much harder to consume data and remain engaged [6].
Hence, this research study aimed to evaluate the clinical learning environment fostered by the
NEUST and its affiliated hospitals by identifying the demographic profile, clinical hospital assignment, core
competencies, and clinical learning experience of fourth-year student nurses. With this, the teaching
modalities implemented by the institution and the clinical instructors’ performance in the clinical setting are
evaluated based on the results of the respondents’ experiences. Thus, determining the institution’s
performance in terms of delivering a highly competitive and learning-conducive clinical learning
environment for its students.
2. RESEARCH METHOD
This study utilized a descriptive – quantitative correlational design and total enumeration as the
sampling procedure. This was conducted in Nueva Ecija University of Science and Technology at General
Tinio, Cabanatuan City, Nueva Ecija during the months of January to May 2021, gathering data from level
four student nurses as respondents. The researchers chose the Level Four students as the respondents because
they hold vast exposure to clinical settings compared to that of other year levels. Inclusion criteria includes a
total of 1148 clinical hours and under the CHED Memorandum Order No. 14 (CMO No.14) curriculum,
which agreed with the core competencies that were used in the questionnaire. Thus, the researchers
contemplated that they were the most suited individuals to participate in the study. Students that did not meet
the aforementioned criteria are excluded from the respondent population.
The instrument used in this study contains the following sections: (1) Demographic profile that
includes age, sex, and monthly family income; (2) Clinical Hospital Assignment that involves affiliated
hospitals, area of clinical rotation, and duty schedule; (3) Core Competencies adapted from CHED
Memorandum Order (CMO) no. 14 which include safe and quality nursing care, management of resources
and environment, communication, collaboration and teamwork, health education, legal responsibility, ethico-
moral responsibility, personal and professional development, quality improvement, research, and records
management; and (4) Clinical Learning Environment (CLE) that consists of pedagogical atmosphere on the
ward, supervisory relationship, the leadership skills of student nurses in peers, nursing care in the ward, and
clinical instructor relationship. For data analysis, the sample means, frequency, distribution, and Pearson’s r
Correlation were used to find significant relationship of demographic profile to core competencies and
clinical learning experience.
The researchers observed ethical considerations, reviewed and checked by the research board, to
promote the goals and objectives of the research itself, support the social and moral principles, and secure the
values of individuals involved in the research study. The researchers ensured that no respondents were
coerced, deceived, or harmed in participating in the study. Data collection was done after the respondents
were informed about the research objectives and signed the consent form. Also, the researchers assured the
respondents to implement data privacy and confidentiality.
10,001-20,000 4 26.7
20,001-30,000 1 6.7
30,001-40,000 2 13.3
Based on table 1, it is known that there are 15 respondents (100%), showing that most respondents
are between the ages of 21-25 with 8 nursing students (53.3%) and most of the respondents are female
amounting to 12 (80%). The small quantity of respondents is the result of the K-12 implementation in the
Philippine education system that adds two more years in high school which occurred in the school year 2012-
2013[7]. The enrollees are students who belong in the old curriculum and are returning to college to pursue
their undergraduate studies, thus resulting to low enrolment rate. Meanwhile, the majority of respondents
have a family income between Php 5,001-10,000 consisting of 8 respondents (53.3%). This is included in the
demographic parameters to identify whether financial capability is a critical factor in enhanced clinical
learning experience. Since it was argued that a higher income family promotes better learning outcomes as
tools, books, and gadgets effective for learning are fulfilled [8].
Based on table 2, the respondents preferred PJGMRMC, the base hospital, for hospital rotation that
obtained 11 (73.3%), OR for hospital area with 8 (53.3%), and morning shift for duty schedule with 12
(80%). PJGMRMC is the leading government hospital in the province of Nueva Ecija and one of the oldest
hospitals in Central Luzon [9]. It has numerous services ranging from internal medicine, obstetrics and
gynecology, clinical nutrition, and surgery to name a few, which provides a wide-array of exposures for
students. On the other hand, a research study discovered that OR practice provided a significant contribution
to student nurses’ education and was effective in the determination of their career preferences after
graduation [10]. The preference of morning shift is also similar to what a scope review found that
emphasized despite considerable stress during morning shifts, nursing is more active, and there are different
opportunities for learning because more people work during the day [11].
Table 3. Rate and Description of Fourth-year nursing students’ core competencies at NEUST
Core Competencies Rate Description
1. Safety and quality
4.57 Always
nursing care
2. Management of
4.64 Always
resources & environment
3. Communication 4.77 Always
4. Collaboration and team
4.83 Always
work
5. Health education 4.65 Always
6. Legal responsibility 4.89 Always
7. Ethico-moral
4.84 Always
responsibility
8. Personal and
4.61 Always
professional development
9. Quality improvement 4.61 Always
10. Research 4.27 Always
11. Record management 4.81 Always
Based on table 3, legal responsibility obtained the highest rate of 4.89 with a description of always
while research having the lowest rate of 4.27. This means that the respondents always ensure competence in
providing safe care by respecting the client’s privacy and having documentation of care rendered to clients.
Ensuring that the safety and quality of the client are performed in the health care practices are considered to
be the most crucial and essential part of nursing care [12]. But, a few of the respondents do not apply
research findings in nursing practice and even share research conclusions all the time. Information literacy
empowers nurses to use research in their future endeavors to make meaningful and sound clinical decisions
[13]. As such, it is encouraged to promote the dissemination of research findings and apply them to nursing
practice.
Table 4. Rate and Description of Fourth-year nursing students’ clinical learning experience at NEUST
Clinical Learning
Rate Description
Experience
1. Pedagogical
3.69 Fully Agree
Atmosphere in the ward
2. Leadership Skills of
3.82 Fully Agree
Student Nurses in Peers
3. Nursing Care in the
3.82 Fully Agree
Ward
4. Supervisory
3.60 Fully Agree
Relationship
5. Role of the Clinical
3.81 Fully Agree
Instructor
Based on table 4, leadership skills of student nurses in peers and nursing care in the ward gained the
highest rate of 3.82 with descriptions of fully agree, while supervisory relationship secured the lowest rate of
3.60. The data shows that there is an equal opportunity for each member of the team in doing group works,
they educate the client regarding their health and make sure that the documentation is clear. The supervisory
relationship appeared to promote positive energy, but some do not agree with receiving individual
supervision. A cross sectional study concluded that the clinical learning environment and supervision
contribute to the formation of professional competence in future healthcare workers [14]. It was also
discovered that the supervisory connection has a substantial impact on the results of students' experiences.
Hence, supervisions specifically individualized setups support the growth of students.
Based on table 5, the correlation coefficient value of age and safe and quality nursing is -0.514 with
a p-value of 0.050. Since the p-value equals the level of significance established at 0.050, the analysis
indicates that the null hypothesis is rejected, indicating that there is a significant link between real age and
safe and quality nursing. Furthermore, the data indicated that the age and communication correlation
coefficient value is less than the specified level of significance; hence, the null hypothesis is rejected. As a
result, there is a direct relationship between real age and communication. Consequently, both of which are
interpreted as a moderate negative correlation. This implies that younger respondents or respondents who
belong to the common age range of fourth-year nursing students (21-25 years old) tend to have higher
competencies on safe and quality nursing care and in communication than older respondents who belong to
ages 26 years old and above. At the age of 25, the brain patterns start to solidify, and they will become harder
to change [15]. Individuals can still learn new things as they age, but it might take some extra effort.
Based on table 6, the p values are greater than the level of significance set at 0.050, analysis reveals
to accept the null hypothesis. Thus, there is no significant association between demographic profile and any
of the clinical learning experience parameters. This suggests that respondents' clinical learning experiences
are unrelated to whether they are young or elderly, male or female, or have a low or high monthly family
income. This finding is comparable to another study that identified that the age of the participants had no
meaningful connection with the clinical learning experience [16]. Though it was mentioned specifically that
students' learning experiences may be improved by providing preclinical orientation, defining clinical
learning outline and goals to students, and regular visits and monitoring of students in the clinical context.
4. CONCLUSIONS
Level four nursing students showed a good standing in core competencies and clinical learning
experience. Nonetheless, it was revealed that research and supervisory relationship had the lowest rate
compared to other core competencies and clinical learning environment areas. Hence, research competency
must be strengthened and individual supervision must be enforced.
Acknowledgements
This work was made possible by the Nueva Ecija University of Science and Technology – College
of Nursing. We thank our research instructor, Zuzette B. Catabona; research adviser, Divina B. Ocampo; and
dean of the CON, Dr. Jean Guillasper; for their supervision and insightful suggestions in making this study
more impactful. We also acknowledge Cheena B. Mallari, research unit head, for her unrelenting support to
make us, researchers, be better in what we do. We also give appreciation to Kim Jay Rivera for helping us
find participants for our pilot study.
REFERENCES
[1] Saarikoski, M., Isoaho, H., Warne, T., and Leino-Kilpi, H.: ‘The nurse teacher in clinical practice:
developing the new sub-dimension to the Clinical Learning Environment and Supervision (CLES)
Scale’, Int J Nurs Stud, 2008, 45, (8), pp. 1233-1237
[2] Jamshidi, N., Molazem, Z., Sharif, F., Torabizadeh, C., and Najafi Kalyani, M.J.T.S.W.J.: ‘The
challenges of nursing students in the clinical learning environment: A qualitative study’, 2016, 2016
[3] Yang, Y.O., Kim, M., Park, K.Y., and Yang, J.H.: ‘Factors influencing the confidence in core
clinical skills among hospital nurses’, Int J Nurs Pract, 2015, 21, (6), pp. 831-838
[4] Ekstedt, M., Lindblad, M., and Lofmark, A.: ‘Nursing students' perception of the clinical learning
environment and supervision in relation to two different supervision models - a comparative cross-
sectional study’, BMC Nurs, 2019, 18, pp. 49
[5] Khatoon, S., Sha, S.Y., Khan, A., Ali, Z., and Ali, S.A.J.O.J.o.N.: ‘Assessment of clinical learning
environment, supervision (CLES) among nursing students, Hyderabad, Sindh, Pakistan’, 2019, 9,
(04), pp. 408
[6] Kraft, M.A., Marinell, W.H., and Shen-Wei Yee, D.J.A.E.R.J.: ‘School organizational contexts,
teacher turnover, and student achievement: Evidence from panel data’, 2016, 53, (5), pp. 1411-1449
[7] Trance, N.J.C., and Trance, L.A.M.L.: ‘Embracing the K-12 curriculum: accounts of Philippine
teachers and students’, in Editor (Ed.)^(Eds.): ‘Book Embracing the K-12 curriculum: accounts of
Philippine teachers and students’ (IOP Publishing, 2019, edn.), pp. 012031
[8] T. J. Bartik and B. Hershbein, “Degrees of poverty: The relationship between family income
background and the returns to education,” Upjohn Institute working paper, pp. 18–284, 2018.
[9] R. Vergara, “House of Representatives - House Bill No. 3889,” Aiza - Amazon AWSS, 2019.
[Online]. Available: https://hrep-website.s3.ap-southeast-
1.amazonaws.com/legisdocs/basic_18/HB09157.pdf. [Accessed: 08-Jan-2022].
[10] Yavuz van Giersbergen, M., Ozsaker, E., Dirimese, E., and Alcan, A.O.: ‘The Operating Room
Experiences of Nursing Students: A Focus Group Study’, J Perianesth Nurs, 2016, 31, (2), pp. 146-
153
[11] Ejebu, O.Z., Dall'Ora, C., and Griffiths, P.: ‘Nurses' experiences and preferences around shift
patterns: A scoping review’, PLoS One, 2021, 16, (8), pp. e0256300
[12] J. Johnson, “What is quality and safety in nursing?,” GCU, 14-Feb-2018. [Online]. Available:
https://www.gcu.edu/blog/nursing-health-care/what-quality-and-safety-nursing. [Accessed: 08-Jan-
2022].
[13] B. F. Schloman, “Information Resources: Information Literacy: The Benefits of Partnership,” WHY
DO NURSES NEED RESEARCH?, 12-Sep-2017. [Online]. Available:
https://nursingonline.nsuok.edu/degrees/rn-to-bsn/why-nurses-need-research/. [Accessed: 08-Jan-
2022].
[14] Pitkanen, S., Kaariainen, M., Oikarainen, A., Tuomikoski, A.M., Elo, S., Ruotsalainen, H.,
Saarikoski, M., Karsamanoja, T., and Mikkonen, K.: ‘Healthcare students' evaluation of the clinical
learning environment and supervision - a cross-sectional study’, Nurse Educ Today, 2018, 62, pp.
143-149
[15] Arain, M., Haque, M., Johal, L., Mathur, P., Nel, W., Rais, A., Sandhu, R., and Sharma, S.:
‘Maturation of the adolescent brain’, Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat, 2013, 9, pp. 449-461
[16] Gemuhay, H.M., Kalolo, A., Mirisho, R., Chipwaza, B., Nyangena, E.J.N.R., and Practice: ‘Factors
affecting performance in clinical practice among preservice diploma nursing students in Northern
Tanzania’, 2019, 2019