IN THE COURT OF HON’BLE PRINCIPLE SUBORDINATE JUDGE

AT HOSUR

HMOP /2023

PETITIONER : S. ARAVIND KUKMAR

Vs

RESPONDENT : N. SINDHU

PETITION FILED UNDER SECTION 13 (1) (i-a) HINDU MARRIAGE ACT

1955

I. Description of the Petitioner:

Mr. S. Aravind Kumar, Son of Subramani Reddy, Hindu, aged about 33

years, residing at Pedha Elasagiri village, Begepalli Post, Hosur – 635126,
Krishnagiri District.

(Address for service of process is as above)

II. Description of the Respondent:

Mrs.N. Sindhu W/o S. Aravind Kumar and Daughter of Nandish Reddy,

Hindu, aged about 23 years, residing at D.No.1/465, Nagasandiram village,
Kuppalli Post, Denkanikottai Taluk, Krishnagiri District.
(Address for service of process is as above)

The petitioner humbly submits that :

1.The Petitioner humbly submits that the respondent is the legal wedded
wife of the petitioner and the marriage between the petitioner and the
respondent was held at Sri Varadaraja Swamy Temple, Anniyalam village of
Denkanikotta Talluk of Krishnagiri District on 04.12.2020 as per caste custom
and usage. The said marriage between the petitioner and the respondent is
arranged marriage. At the time of marriage, the petitioner provided 7 ½
sovereign of Mangalyam and for the chain and 1 sovereign of Thali with
Gundumani, and 1 ½ sovereign of Ring to the Respondent and gave a sum of
Rs.1,00,000/- by way of cash to the parents of the Respondent for marriage
expences and it is further submitted that after the marriage, both the Petitioner
and the Respondent started marital life at matrimonial house situated at Pedha
Elasagiri village of Hosur Taluk of Krishnagiri District. But due to wedlock, the
Respondent not blessed with issues.

2.The Petitioner humbly submits that from the 1 st day of marital lie itself
often and often without any reason, the Respondent made unwanted quarrel
with the Petitioner and his parents and took asylum at paternal house. Each
and every time, the Petitioner convened a panchayath and taking the
Respondent to matrimonial house. But again and again the Respondent is
doing the same activities and it is further submitted that the Respondent
always spending time with cellphone and did not at taking care of the
petitioner or his parents, In this regard the petitioner advised the Respondent
several times, but the Respondent have not obeyed the words of the petitioner
and often and often the respondent was making unwanted quarrels with the
Petitioner and his family members for each and every trival issue.

3.The petitioner further states that finally in the first week of

March 2022 without informing to the Petitioner and his parents, the
Respondent left the matrimonial house and took asylum at her parents’ house.
The petitioner tried in so many panchayaths to bring back the Respondent to
matrimonial house but all in vein. The act of the Respondent is illegal and
unlawful and The Petitioner further states that till today neither the
respondent nor her family members have no response about the reunion. The
petitioner further states that the respondent being the legally wedded wife of
the petitioner, the respondent is bound to come and lead life with the petitioner
as a dutiful wife. The respondent is residing along with her parents and
enjoying her life along with her parents, whereas the petitioner is suffering
even to meet his daily needs, but the respondent is bound to be a dutiful wife.It
is further submitted that the respondent herself left the matrimonial house
without any sufficient cause. The petitioner is suffering lot even for his food
and also the isolation of the petitioner caused great mental agony, and the
petitioner felt great hardship because of the respondent’s act. Hence, the
petitioner had caused a held a panchayath in the 22.07.2023 but it felt to vein
and she had expressed her opinion that she is not interested to live with the
petitioner and she had called upon the petitioner and other panchayathdars
and executed a deed of dissolution and handed over to the petitioner on
23.07.2023 .And the petitioner submits that it is the bounden duty of the
Hindu wife to lead his marital life under a single roof with her husband. But
the respondent is voluntarily and willfully discarding and deserting the
petitioner from exercising his conjugal rights. But there was no response from
the respondent. The respondent deprived the petitioner and her family
members and the respondent made cruelty and the petitioner suffered a lot
because of the respondent’s uncivilized behavior. The petitioner is innocent
and ignorant and fearing the moral and ethical value and respecting the elders
in the community. The petitioner as a matter of right is entitled to have the
marriage annulled through the court of law and get a decree of divorce for the
valid and justifiable reasons as stated above. The omission and commission on
the part of the respondent has caused great panic and anxiety in the mind of
petitioner and it is no longer safe to live with the respondent and hence the
petitioner is filing this petition for divorce.Hence the petitioner has no other go
except to file the petitioner for

4. That in view of the above circumstances, the petitioner has no other

go except to break the marital tie and he is not prepared to live with the
respondent as husband any longer. Therefore it has become necessary for the
petitioner to seek the decree of divorce through the process of the Honourable
court. The petitioner has not filed any similar petition for divorce in any other
court of law and there is no collusion whatsoever between the petitioner and
the respondent.

4. The cause of action for the petition arose on 04.12.2020 when the
petitioner got married to the respondent and on subsequent dates when the
and when the respondent left the company of the petitioner in the month of
march 2022 and when the petitioner and her parents had made a panchayath
which felt in vein and when again a panchayath held which also felt in vein
and thereafter on 22.07.2023 which also felt in vein and finally when the
respondent along with the family members and along with the panchayathdars
had executed a deed of dissolution and expressed her consent not to live with
the petitioner and all held at Hosur town and taluk, Krishnagiri District, within
the jurisdiction of this Hon’ble Court and hence the petition and the petitioner
had not filed any other petitioner before any other court of law.

5. The petitioner herewith pays the court fees of Rs.50/- as per TNCF
Act, towards the fee for this petition.

THEREFORE, the petitioner humbly prays that the Honorable court may be
pleased to pass a decree and judgment.

a) To pass a decree of divorce against the respondent to dissolve the

marriage tie between the petitioner and the respondent

b) To grant the costs of the petitioner against the respondent,

AND

c) To grant such other reliefs as this Honourble court may deem fit and
necessary in the circumstances of the case and thus render justice.

ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PETITIONER

 VERITIFICATION

The contents of the above Paragraphs are read over are correct to the
best of my knowledge and belief, and I signed this at Hosur on

PETITIONER

LIST OF DOCUMENTS
S.No Date Particulars Nature
1. 04.12.2020 Marriage Invitation Original

2. -- Joint Photo Original

3. -- Aadhaar card of the petitioner Xerox copy

4. -- Voter ID card of the Respondent Xerox copy

5. 23.07.2023 Deed of Dissolution Original

Counsel for the Petitioner

 IN THE COURT OF HON’BLE PRINCIPLE SUBORDINATE JUDGE

AT HOSUR

HMOP /2023

PETITIONER : S. ARAVIND KUKMAR

Vs

RESPONDENT : N. SINDHU

DUPLICATE PETITION

I. Description of the Petitioner:

Mr. S. Aravind Kumar, Son of Subramani Reddy, hindu, aged about 33

years, residing at Pedha Elasagiri village, Begepalli Post, Hosur – 635126,
Krishnagiri District.

(Address for service of process is as above)

II. Description of the Respondent:

Mrs.N. Sindhu W/o S. Aravind Kumar and Daughter of Nandish Reddy,

hindu, aged about 23 years, residing at D.No.1/465, Nagasandiram village,
Kuppalli Post, Denkanikottai Taluk, Krishnagiri District.
(Address for service of process is as above)

The petitioner humbly submits that :

1.The Petitioner humbly submits that the respondent is the legal wedded
wife of the petitioner and the marriage between the petitioner and the
respondent was held at Sri Varadaraja Swamy Temple, Anniyalam village of
Denkanikotta Talluk of Krishnagiri District on 04.12.2020 as per caste custom
and usage. The said marriage between the petitioner and the respondent is
arranged marriage. At the time of marriage, the petitioner provided 7 ½
sovereign of Mangalyam and for the chain and 1 sovereign of Thali with
Gundumani, and 1 ½ sovereign of Ring to the Respondent and gave a sum of
Rs.1,00,000/- by way of cash to the parents of the Respondent for marriage
expences and it is further submitted that after the marriage, both the Petitioner
and the Respondent started marital life at matrimonial house situated at Pedha
Elasagiri village of Hosur Taluk of Krishnagiri District. But due to wedlock, the
Respondent not blessed with issues.

2.The Petitioner humbly submits that from the 1 st day of marital lie itself
often and often without any reason, the Respondent made unwanted quarrel
with the Petitioner and his parents and took asylum at paternal house. Each
and every time, the Petitioner convened a panchayath and taking the
Respondent to matrimonial house. But again and again the Respondent is
doing the same activities and it is further submitted that the Respondent
always spending time with cellphone and did not at taking care of the
petitioner or his parents, In this regard the petitioner advised the Respondent
several times, but the Respondent have not obeyed the words of the petitioner
and often and often the respondent was making unwanted quarrels with the
Petitioner and his family members for each and every trival issue.

3.The petitioner further states that finally in the first week of

March 2022 without informing to the Petitioner and his parents, the
Respondent left the matrimonial house and took asylum at her parents’ house.
The petitioner tried in so many panchayaths to bring back the Respondent to
matrimonial house but all in vein. The act of the Respondent is illegal and
unlawful and The Petitioner further states that till today neither the
respondent nor her family members have no response about the reunion. The
petitioner further states that the respondent being the legally wedded wife of
the petitioner, the respondent is bound to come and lead life with the petitioner
as a dutiful wife. The respondent is residing along with her parents and
enjoying her life along with her parents, whereas the petitioner is suffering
even to meet his daily needs, but the respondent is bound to be a dutiful wife.It
is further submitted that the respondent herself left the matrimonial house
without any sufficient cause. The petitioner is suffering lot even for his food
and also the isolation of the petitioner caused great mental agony, and the
petitioner felt great hardship because of the respondent’s act. Hence, the
petitioner had caused a held a panchayath in the 22.07.2023 but it felt to vein
and she had expressed her opinion that she is not interested to live with the
petitioner and she had called upon the petitioner and other panchayathdars
and executed a deed of dissolution and handed over to the petitioner on
23.07.2023 .And the petitioner submits that it is the bounden duty of the
Hindu wife to lead his marital life under a single roof with her husband. But
the respondent is voluntarily and willfully discarding and deserting the
petitioner from exercising his conjugal rights. But there was no response from
the respondent. The respondent deprived the petitioner and her family
members and the respondent made cruelty and the petitioner suffered a lot
because of the respondent’s uncivilized behavior. The petitioner is innocent
and ignorant and fearing the moral and ethical value and respecting the elders
in the community. The petitioner as a matter of right is entitled to have the
marriage annulled through the court of law and get a decree of divorce for the
valid and justifiable reasons as stated above. The omission and commission on
the part of the respondent has caused great panic and anxiety in the mind of
petitioner and it is no longer safe to live with the respondent and hence the
petitioner is filing this petition for divorce.Hence the petitioner has no other go
except to file the petitioner for

4. That in view of the above circumstances, the petitioner has no other

go except to break the marital tie and he is not prepared to live with the
respondent as husband any longer. Therefore it has become necessary for the
petitioner to seek the decree of divorce through the process of the Honourable
court. The petitioner has not filed any similar petition for divorce in any other
court of law and there is no collusion whatsoever between the petitioner and
the respondent.

4. The cause of action for the petition arose on 04.12.2020 when the
petitioner got married to the respondent and on subsequent dates when the
and when the respondent left the company of the petitioner in the month of
march 2022 and when the petitioner and her parents had made a panchayath
which felt in vein and when again a panchayath held which also felt in vein
and thereafter on 22.07.2023 which also felt in vein and finally when the
respondent along with the family members and along with the panchayathdars
had executed a deed of dissolution and expressed her consent not to live with
the petitioner and all held at Hosur town and taluk, Krishnagiri District, within
the jurisdiction of this Hon’ble Court and hence the petition and the petitioner
had not filed any other petitioner before any other court of law.

5. The petitioner herewith pays the court fees of Rs.50/- as per TNCF
Act, towards the fee for this petition.

THEREFORE, the petitioner humbly prays that the Honorable court may be
pleased to pass a decree and judgment.

d) To pass a decree of divorce against the respondent to dissolve the

marriage tie between the petitioner and the respondent

e) To grant the costs of the petitioner against the respondent,

AND

f) To grant such other reliefs as this Honourble court may deem fit and
necessary in the circumstances of the case and thus render justice.

ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PETITIONER

VERITIFICATION
 The contents of the above Paragraphs are read over are correct to the
best of my knowledge and belief, and I signed this at Hosur on

PETITIONER

LIST OF DOCUMENTS
S.No Date Particulars Nature
1. 04.12.2020 Marriage Invitation Original

2. -- Joint Photo Original

3. -- Aadhaar card of the petitioner Xerox copy

4. -- Voter ID card of the Respondent Xerox copy

5. 23.07.2023 Deed of Dissolution Original

Counsel for the Petitioner

 IN THE COURT OF HON’BLE PRINCIPLE SUBORDINATE JUDGE

AT HOSUR

HMOP /2023

PETITIONER : S. ARAVIND KUKMAR

Vs

RESPONDENT : N. SINDHU

PROOF AFFIDAVIT OF THE PETITONER

I Aravind Kumar, Son of Subramani Reddy, hindu, aged about 33 years,

residing at Pedha Elasagiri village, Begepalli Post, Hosur – 635126, Krishnagiri
District. Do hereby solemnly affirm and state as follows.
2.Iam the deponent herein and the petitioner in the above petition.
3.I humbly submit that the respondent is my legal wedded wife and the
marriage between me and the respondent was held at Sri Varadaraja Swamy
Temple, Anniyalam village of Denkanikotta Talluk of Krishnagiri District on
04.12.2020 as per caste custom and usage. The said marriage between me
and the respondent is arranged marriage. At the time of marriage myself had
provided 7 ½ sovereign of Mangalyam and for the chain and 1 sovereign of
Thali with Gundumani, and 1 ½ sovereign of Ring to the Respondent and gave
a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- by way of cash to the parents of the Respondent for
marriage expenses and it is further submitted that after the marriage, both
myself and the Respondent started marital life at matrimonial house situated
at Pedha Elasagiri village of Hosur Taluk of Krishnagiri District. But due to
wedlock, the Respondent not blessed with issues.

2. I humbly submit that from the 1 st day of marital lie itself often and
often without any reason, the Respondent made unwanted quarrel with me and
my parents and took asylum at paternal house. Each and every time, myself
convened a panchayath and by taking the Respondent to matrimonial house.
But again and again the Respondent was doing the same activities and it is
further submitted that the Respondent always spending time with cellphone
and did not at taking care of me or my parents, In this regard I had advised
the Respondent several times, but the Respondent have not obeyed the words
of me and often and often the respondent was making unwanted quarrels with
me and with my family members for each and every trival issue.

3.I further state that finally in the first week of March 2022 without
informing me and my parents, the Respondent left the matrimonial house and
took asylum at her parents’ house. I had tried in so many panchayaths to
bring back the Respondent to matrimonial house but all in vein. The act of the
Respondent is illegal and unlawful and I further state that till today neither the
respondent nor her family members have no response about the reunion. I
further state that the respondent being the legally wedded wife of the
petitioner, the respondent is bound to come and lead life with me as a dutiful
wife. The respondent is residing along with her parents and enjoying her life
along with her parents, whereas I am suffering even to meet his daily needs,
but the respondent is bound to be a dutiful wife. It is further submitted that
the respondent herself left the matrimonial house without any sufficient
cause. I am suffering lot even for his food and also the isolation of me had
caused great mental agony, and I had been felt to great hardship because of
the respondent’s act. Hence I had caused a held a panchayath in the
22.07.2023 but it felt to vein and the respondent had expressed her opinion
that she is not interested to live with me and she had called upon me and other
panchayathdars and executed a deed of dissolution and handed over to me on
23.07.2023 .And I submit that it is the bounden duty of the Hindu wife to lead
his marital life under a single roof with her husband. But the respondent is
voluntarily and willfully discarding and deserting me from exercising his
conjugal rights but there was no response from the respondent. The
respondent deprived me and my family members and the respondent made
cruelty and I had suffered a lot because of the respondent’s uncivilized
behavior. I am an innocent and ignorant and fearing the moral and ethical
value and respecting the elders in the community. myself as a matter of right is
entitled to have the marriage annulled through the court of law and get a
decree of divorce for the valid and justifiable reasons as stated above. The
omission and commission on the part of the respondent has caused great panic
and anxiety in the mind of petitioner and it is no longer safe to live with the
respondent and hence the petitioner is filing this petition for divorce. Hence I
have no other go except to file myself for Divorce

4. I further submit that in view of the above circumstances, myself has

no other go except to break the marital tie and iam not prepared to live with
the respondent as husband any longer. Therefore it has become necessary for
the petitioner to seek the decree of divorce through the process of the
Honourable court. I have not filed any similar petition for divorce in any
other court of law and there is no collusion whatsoever between me and the
respondent.

Hence therefore I Humbly pray that this Honorable court may kindly issue
notice to the respondent and enquire the above dispute and pass decree and
judgment as prayed in the above petition and thus render justice.

Solemnly affirmed and signed before me at Hosur

Advocate Hosur
 IN THE COURT OF HON’BLE
PRINCIPLE SUBORDINATE JUDGE

AT HOSUR

HMOP /2023

PETITIONER: ARAVIND KUKMAR

Vs

RESPONDENT: N. SINDHU

PETITION FILED UNDER

SECTION 13 (1) (i-a) HINDU
MARRIAGE ACT 1955
 Counsel for the petitioner

IN THE COURT OF HON’BLE

PRINCIPLE SUBORDINATE JUDGE

AT HOSUR

HMOP /2023

PETITIONER: ARAVIND KUKMAR

Vs

RESPONDENT: N. SINDHU

DUPLICATE PETITION

Counsel for the petitioner

IN THE COURT OF HON’BLE
PRINCIPLE SUBORDINATE JUDGE

AT HOSUR

HMOP /2023

PETITIONER: ARAVIND KUKMAR

Vs

RESPONDENT: N. SINDHU

PROOF AFFIDAVIT OF THE

PETITIONER

Counsel for the petitioner