Design, Construction, Supply, Installation, Completion, Testing, Commissioning and

CRCC – CREC –
Maintenance of Electrified Double Track from Gemas to Johor Bahru
CCCC CONSORTIUM
SDN. BHD. GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR
BLOCK 15 (KEMPAS BARU TO JOHOR BAHRU STATION)
Doc No :GJBEDTP/R/CRJGR/DR/SIPY-SSP/S5.0/GEO/31001 Rev. B Date:02/07/19 Page: i

TABLE OF CONTENT
1.0 INTRODUCTION ························································ 1
1.1 BACKGROUND ········································································· 1
1.2 LIMITATION ON USE AND LIABILITY············································ 2

2.0 SITE CONDITIONS ···················································· 3

2.1 SITE GEOLOGY ········································································ 3
2.2 SUBSOIL CONDITIONS······························································ 4

3.0 DESIGN PARAMETERS ············································· 4

3.1 SHEAR STRENGTH PARAMETER ··············································· 4
3.2 CONSOLIDATION PARAMETER ·················································· 5
3.3 GROUND WATER CONDITIONS ·················································· 6
3.4 LOADINGS··············································································· 6

4.0 DESIGN CRITERIA ···················································· 7

4.1 SETTLEMENT CRITERIA···························································· 7
4.2 SLOPE STABILITY CRITERIA ······················································ 8
4.3 DYNAMIC CONSIDERATIONS ····················································· 8

5.0 GROUND TREATMENT DESIGN·································· 9

5.1 GENERAL ················································································ 9
5.2 GROUND IMPROVEMENT WITH COMPLETE REMOVAL AND
REPLACEMENT (R&R)······························································· 9
5.2.1 GENERAL ····································································· 9
5.2.2 SLOPE STABILITY························································ 10
5.3 SURCHARGE PRELOADING WITH PARTIAL R&R ························ 11
5.3.1 GENERAL ··································································· 11
5.3.2 PRIMARY SETTLEMENT ··············································· 11
5.3.3 SLOPE STABILITY························································ 13
5.4 STONE COLUMN ···································································· 15
5.5 PILED EMBANKMENT······························································ 16
5.3.4 GENERAL ··································································· 16
5.6 GEOTECHNICAL INSTRUMENTATION ······································· 17

6.0 FOUNDATION ASSESSMENT ··································· 18

6.1 SHALLOW FOUNDATION FOR BOX CULVERT (BC) ····················· 18
 Design, Construction, Supply, Installation, Completion, Testing, Commissioning and
CRCC – CREC –
Maintenance of Electrified Double Track from Gemas to Johor Bahru
CCCC CONSORTIUM
SDN. BHD. GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR
BLOCK 15 (KEMPAS BARU TO JOHOR BAHRU STATION)
Doc No :GJBEDTP/R/CRJGR/DR/SIPY-SSP/S5.0/GEO/31001 Rev. B Date:02/07/19 Page: ii

7.0 RETAINING STRUCTURES ······································· 19

8.0 CONCLUSIONS ······················································· 22

LIST OF TABLES

Table 3.1 Recommended Strength Parameters for Slope Analysis

Table 3.2 Summary of Soil Parameters
Table 5.1 Summary of Slope Stability Analysis (R&R)
Table 5.2 Summary of Settlement Analysis and Time Rate Settlement (R&R+S)
Table 5.3 Summary of Slope Stability Analysis (R&R+S)
Table 5.4 Summary of Stone Column
Table 5.5 Summary of Design Spacing for Stone Column
Table 5.6 Summary of Slope Stability Analysis (Stone Column Area)
Table 5.7 Summary of Piled Embankment Design (PE)
Table 5.8 Summary of Instrumentations Monitoring Schedule

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure 2.1 Geology of the Area Surrounding the Proposed Site

Figure 3.1 Train Loading
Figure 4.1 Induced Deviator Stress/MP blows vs Depth

LIST OF APPENDICES

Appendix A Subsoil Profile & SI Laboratory Test Result

Appendix B SI Plots
Appendix C Summary of Ground Treatment
Appendix D Slope Stability Analysis
Appendix E Settlement Calculation
Appendix F Stone Column Design
Appendix G Piled Embankment Design
Appendix H Bearing Capacity Calculation for Box Culvert
Appendix I Bearing Capacity Calculation for Retaining Wall
Appendix J AMP Results
 Design, Construction, Supply, Installation, Completion, Testing, Commissioning and
CRCC – CREC –
Maintenance of Electrified Double Track from Gemas to Johor Bahru
CCCC CONSORTIUM
SDN. BHD. GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR
BLOCK 15 (KEMPAS BARU TO JOHOR BAHRU STATION)
Doc No :GJBEDTP/R/CRJGR/DR/SIPY-SSP/S5.0/GEO/31001 Rev. B Date:02/07/19 Page:1

1.0 INTRODUCTION

1.1 BACKGROUND

The Electrified Double Track Project involves the construction of an estimated 197km new
proposed electrified double track railway from Gemas to Johor Bahru. The project can be
divided into fifteen (15) blocks, namely:-

a) Block 1 Station Gemas to Station Segamat CH.563108 - CH.587300

b) Block 2 Station Segamat to Station Genuang CH.587300 - CH.595055
c) Block 3 Station Genuang to Station Tenang CH.595055 - CH.605555
d) Block 4 Station Tenang to Station Labis CH.605555 - CH.617200
e) Block 5 Station Labis to Station Bekok CH.617200 - CH.632600
f) Block 6 Station Bekok to Station Paloh CH.632600 - CH.647900
g) Block 7 Station Paloh to Station Chamek CH.647900 - CH.655000
h) Block 8 Station Chamek to Station Kluang CH.655000 - CH.673200
i) Block 9 Station Kluang to Station Mengkibol CH.673200 - CH.677400
j) Block 10 Station Mengkibol to Station Ranggam CH.677400 - CH.690150
k) Block 11 Station Renggam to Station Layang-layang CH.690150 - CH.702600
l) Block 12 Station Layang-layang to Station Kulai CH.702600 - CH.725700
m) Block 13 Station Kulai to Station Senai CH.725700 - CH.736200
n) Block 14 Station Senai to Station Kempas Baru CH.736200 - CH.746000
o) Block 15 Station Kempas Baru to Station Johor Bahru CH.746000 - CH.754209

This design report will cover the geotechnical design aspects for this project such as ground
improvement works, retaining wall assessment and box culvert foundation in Block 15. This
report shall be read together with the Soil Investigation Factual Report which was prepared
based on all the available subsoil information gathered from the soil investigation carried out.

Block 15 starts from CH.746000 to CH.754180 that is between Kempas Baru to Johor Bahru
Station. The total stretch for Block 15 is approximately 8.18 km.
 Design, Construction, Supply, Installation, Completion, Testing, Commissioning and
CRCC – CREC –
Maintenance of Electrified Double Track from Gemas to Johor Bahru
CCCC CONSORTIUM
SDN. BHD. GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR
BLOCK 15 (KEMPAS BARU TO JOHOR BAHRU STATION)
Doc No :GJBEDTP/R/CRJGR/DR/SIPY-SSP/S5.0/GEO/31001 Rev. B Date:02/07/19 Page:2

1.2 LIMITATION ON USE AND LIABILITY

The ground is a product of continuing natural and man-made processes and therefore
exhibits a variety of characteristics and properties that vary from place to place and can
change with time. Geotechnical engineering involves gathering and assimilating limited
facts about these characteristics and properties in order to understand or predict the
behaviour of the ground on a particular site under certain conditions. This document
reports such facts obtained by inspection, probing, sampling and testing. They are
directly relevant only to the ground at the place where and time when the investigation
was carried out.

Any interpretation or recommendation given in this report shall be understood to be

based on judgment and experience and not on greater knowledge of the facts than the
reported investigations would imply.

The interpretation and recommendations are therefore opinions provided for our Client's
sole use in accordance with the engagement. As such they do not necessarily address
all aspects of ground behavior on the subject site. The responsibility of Sepakat Setia
Perunding (Sdn) Bhd (SSP) is solely to its Client (Design and Build Main Local
Contractor, SIPP-YTL JV). It is not intended for and should not be relied upon by any
third party. No Liability is undertaken to any third party.
 Design, Construction, Supply, Installation, Completion, Testing, Commissioning and
CRCC – CREC –
Maintenance of Electrified Double Track from Gemas to Johor Bahru
CCCC CONSORTIUM
SDN. BHD. GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR
BLOCK 15 (KEMPAS BARU TO JOHOR BAHRU STATION)
Doc No :GJBEDTP/R/CRJGR/DR/SIPY-SSP/S5.0/GEO/31001 Rev. B Date:02/07/19 Page:3

2.0 SITE CONDITIONS

2.1 SITE GEOLOGY

Based on the “Geological Map of Peninsular Malaysia”, 1985 published by the Department of
Minerals and Geoscience Malaysia, Block 15 area which is from Kempas to Johor Bahru, is
entirely dominated by Quaternary deposits. The Quaternary deposits that covering the site area
are Beruas and Simpang Formation. Beruas formation is also known as Young Alluvium as
described by Suntharalingam (1987). This formation consists mainly of unconsolidated clay, silt
and sand but less gravel deposits that are carried within the fluviatile environment. Underlying
Beruas Formation is Simpang Formation. This formation being the oldest formation, a complex
of unconsolidated sediments consisting of sand, gravel, silt and clay in mixtures. Simpang
Formation is also considered to be equivalent to Old Alluvium (Walker, 1955). The geology is
shown in Figure 2.1

Figure 2.1 - Geology of the Area Surrounding the Proposed Site

 Design, Construction, Supply, Installation, Completion, Testing, Commissioning and
CRCC – CREC –
Maintenance of Electrified Double Track from Gemas to Johor Bahru
CCCC CONSORTIUM
SDN. BHD. GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR
BLOCK 15 (KEMPAS BARU TO JOHOR BAHRU STATION)
Doc No :GJBEDTP/R/CRJGR/DR/SIPY-SSP/S5.0/GEO/31001 Rev. B Date:02/07/19 Page:4

2.2 SUBSOIL CONDITIONS

The soil profile along the alignment shows a consistent pattern of weak soil and ranging from
1m to 3.5m thick except at localised areas where the weak soil can be extended to 8.0m. The
design is based on the refined soil parameters interpreted from confirmatory Mackintosh Probe
(MP) and Trial Pit (TP) together with existing boreholes (BH) and Cone Penetration Test (CPT).

The available Soil Investigation (SI) results are presented in Appendix A & Appendix B for
reference. Generally, the subsoil is mainly composed of very soft to hard sandy Silt/Clay and
silty Sand along the alignment in Block 15.

3.0 DESIGN PARAMETERS

3.1 SHEAR STRENGTH PARAMETER

Generally, thin layer of weak soils with SPTN less than 4 or Mackintosh Probe resistance less
than 40 blows/ft can generally be found along the alignment particularly at the river valleys and
low lying ground. This is predominantly alluvial deposit overlying the residual soils. As the soils
are not predominantly of highly plastic soft soil, it is termed “weak soil” for the current design
intend.
As discussed earlier, the weak soil can generally be divided into 2 distinct layers namely the
upper weak layer and the lower weak layer as shown in Table 3.1. The weak soils are
underlain with firm to stiff soil with SPTN values ranging between 4 and 8.

Unit Undrained Drained

MP Value
Soil Layer Weight su C’ Remarks
(Blows/ft) 3 ’
(kN/m ) (kPa) (kPa)
Embankment Fill & R&R material - 20 - 5 30
Refer to Su Plot
Upper Weak Layer (non-treated) ≤ 20 16 20 - 20
(Appendix B)
From Nearest MP
Lower Weak Layer (non-treated) 20-40 16 30 - 22
Results
Upper Weak Layer (Treated) - 16 * - 25
Lower Weak Layer (Treated) - 16 * - 25
Medium Stiff (SPTN 4 – 8) ≥ 40 17 - 1 27 Refer to ts Plot

* depending on the gained in strength resulted from the treatment

Table 3.1 Recommended Strength Parameters for Slope Analysis
 Design, Construction, Supply, Installation, Completion, Testing, Commissioning and
CRCC – CREC –
Maintenance of Electrified Double Track from Gemas to Johor Bahru
CCCC CONSORTIUM
SDN. BHD. GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR
BLOCK 15 (KEMPAS BARU TO JOHOR BAHRU STATION)
Doc No :GJBEDTP/R/CRJGR/DR/SIPY-SSP/S5.0/GEO/31001 Rev. B Date:02/07/19 Page:5

The current design caters for both short term and long term analyses. For short term analyses,
undrained parameters will be adopted for all weak layers while drained parameters will be
adopted for both fill materials and also medium stiff layers due to the stiffer and highly
permeable properties. For long term analyses, drained parameters will be adopted for all soil
layers.

3.2 CONSOLIDATION PARAMETER

The consolidation parameters of the underlying weak cohesive subsoil, such as the coefficient
of consolidation, cv, compression index, cc and the pre-consolidation pressure, Pc’, were
determined from the one-dimensional consolidation test. From the test results, compression
ratio (CR = cc/1+eo) parameter can be derived.

The plots of the above consolidation parameters are presented in Appendix B for reference.

Generally, the weak soils in this location are of relatively low compressibility with a CR value of
0.15 (moderately conservative) except localized areas where higher CR value of 0.22 has been
2
adopted. By adopting a moderately conservative approach, a cv value of 10 m /year has
2
generally been adopted except localised areas where lower c v values of 5 m /year has been
used in design. The summary of the different consolidation parameters based on the laboratory
test results are presented in Table 3.2 for reference. The plotting and derivation of such
parameters can also refer to Appendix B.

Bulk Consolidation Parameters

Soil
SPTN Density, 
Type OCR CR
2
Cv (m /yr)
(kN/m³)

Weak 1.0 0.15 10

0-4 16
Clay 1.0 0.22 5
Table 3.2 Summary of Soil Parameters

Abbrev.:
OCR :Over Consolidation Ratio
CR : Compression Ratio
RR : Recompression Ratio
Cv : Vertical Coefficient of Consolidation

Remarks: The soil parameters are plotted from the collected SI results of Block 15.
 Design, Construction, Supply, Installation, Completion, Testing, Commissioning and
CRCC – CREC –
Maintenance of Electrified Double Track from Gemas to Johor Bahru
CCCC CONSORTIUM
SDN. BHD. GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR
BLOCK 15 (KEMPAS BARU TO JOHOR BAHRU STATION)
Doc No :GJBEDTP/R/CRJGR/DR/SIPY-SSP/S5.0/GEO/31001 Rev. B Date:02/07/19 Page:6

3.3 GROUND WATER CONDITIONS

The groundwater level measured from the boreholes were summarized and ranges from 0.5m
to 7.5m below ground. A ground water level of 1m has been adopted in the current design.

3.4 LOADINGS

The following loadings has been adopted in the analyses:

a. Normal Train Live Load

- 44.7 kPa on top of subballast over 2.3m on the embankment for each track.

b. Extreme Train Live load

- 60.3 kPa on top of subballast (including centrifugal forces and Dynamic Amplification Factor,
DAF).
- Extreme Train Live Load considering allowance of 15% for the increase in wheel load on the
outer rail in curves in connection with non-compensated centrifugal forces and a factor of
1.35 for Dynamic Amplification to the normal train live load.

c. Superimposed dead load (due to ballast, sleeper and rail (SDL)

- 12.5 kPa on top of subballast over 2.3m on the embankment for each track.

d. Superimposed dead load (due to ballast only)

- 6.6 kPa on top of subballast over the “non-train” area of 9m width.
 Design, Construction, Supply, Installation, Completion, Testing, Commissioning and
CRCC – CREC –
Maintenance of Electrified Double Track from Gemas to Johor Bahru
CCCC CONSORTIUM
SDN. BHD. GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR
BLOCK 15 (KEMPAS BARU TO JOHOR BAHRU STATION)
Doc No :GJBEDTP/R/CRJGR/DR/SIPY-SSP/S5.0/GEO/31001 Rev. B Date:02/07/19 Page:7

Figure 3.1 – Train Loading

4.0 DESIGN CRITERIA

4.1 SETTLEMENT CRITERIA

Total Settlement
The maximum settlement of 25mm over 6 months from the date of issuance of Certificate of
Practical Completion.

Differential Settlement
Maximum differential settlement of 10mm of a chord of 10m over 6 months from the date of
issuance of Certificate of Practical Completion.
 Design, Construction, Supply, Installation, Completion, Testing, Commissioning and
CRCC – CREC –
Maintenance of Electrified Double Track from Gemas to Johor Bahru
CCCC CONSORTIUM
SDN. BHD. GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR
BLOCK 15 (KEMPAS BARU TO JOHOR BAHRU STATION)
Doc No :GJBEDTP/R/CRJGR/DR/SIPY-SSP/S5.0/GEO/31001 Rev. B Date:02/07/19 Page:8

4.2 SLOPE STABILITY CRITERIA

The design criteria used for embankments and areas of fill based on the following:

a) Min Factor of Safety (FOS) for short term stability = 1.2

b) Min Factor of Safety (FOS) for long term stability (Normal train live load) = 1.5
c) Min Factor of Safety (FOS) for long term stability (Extreme train live load) = 1.4

4.3 DYNAMIC CONSIDERATIONS

For low embankment generally less than 2m high, the design of ground treatment shall also
consider the dynamic requirements in addition to the static requirements (stability & settlement).
The induced stress on the foundation soils due to repeated train loading shall be maintained
below the threshold strength of the foundation soils in order to minimise the long-term
settlement due to cumulative plastic deformation under repeated loadings.

The induced stress due to the train loadings has been determined as shown in the substructure
report (GJBEDTP/R/CRJGR/DR/SIPY-GCU/GE/T-GE/0001). The threshold shear strength of
the foundation soil is taken as half the ultimate compressive strength of the soil (i.e. Su for clay)
as recommended in “Track Geotechnology and Substructure Management” by Seliq, ET &
Waters, JM, 1994.

Assuming that Mackintosh Probe (MP) resistance of 1 blows/0.3m is equivalent to Su of the

soils, the minimum required MP resistance to meet the above dynamic requirements at various
depth below the subgrade level is estimated and presented in Figure 4.1 for reference. Thus, for
low embankment, removal and replacement shall be carried out to ensure that the minimum
required MP resistance is achieved at the base of the excavation.
 Design, Construction, Supply, Installation, Completion, Testing, Commissioning and
CRCC – CREC –
Maintenance of Electrified Double Track from Gemas to Johor Bahru
CCCC CONSORTIUM
SDN. BHD. GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR
BLOCK 15 (KEMPAS BARU TO JOHOR BAHRU STATION)
Doc No :GJBEDTP/R/CRJGR/DR/SIPY-SSP/S5.0/GEO/31001 Rev. B Date:02/07/19 Page:9

Min. Makintosh Probe Resistance (blows/0.3m)

Figure 4.1 - Induced Deviator Stress/MP blows vs Depth

5.0 GROUND TREATMENT DESIGN

5.1 GENERAL

Ground treatment for the railway alignment was designed based on the following:
a) Interpreted subsoil profile and ground water levels based on available soil investigation data
b) Provided fill embankment height and profile
c) Design criteria set for the project

There are four (4) types of proposed ground treatment for Block 15 as below:
a) Ground improvement with complete removal and replacement (R&R)
b) Surcharge preloading with partial removal and replacement (R&R+S)
c) Stone Column (SC)
d) Piled Embankment (PE)

The details of the proposed ground treatment works are discussed in the following sections.

5.2 GROUND IMPROVEMENT WITH COMPLETE REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT (R&R)

5.2.1 GENERAL

Complete removal and replacement involved total removal of the weak consolidation layer. This
approach of ground treatment eliminates the weak soil which would cause settlement due to the
additional embankment fill. Along the alignment of block 15 where complete removal is to be
carried out, the MP and BH results generally indicate a weak soil layer of approximately 1m to
 Design, Construction, Supply, Installation, Completion, Testing, Commissioning and
CRCC – CREC –
Maintenance of Electrified Double Track from Gemas to Johor Bahru
CCCC CONSORTIUM
SDN. BHD. GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR
BLOCK 15 (KEMPAS BARU TO JOHOR BAHRU STATION)
Doc No :GJBEDTP/R/CRJGR/DR/SIPY-SSP/S5.0/GEO/31001 Rev. B Date:02/07/19 Page:10

3.5m thick except at localised area where thicker weak soil up to 6.0m was discovered. The
depth of R&R for complete removal and replacement has been determined using Mackintosh
Probe (MP) blow count of 40. The extent of the ground treatment areas was identified and listed
in Appendix C.

Only several localised areas where the weak layer is slightly thicker. This type of soil condition
is addressed by using surcharge preloading with partial R&R.

5.2.2 SLOPE STABILITY

Stability analysis has been carried out on embankment with critical conditions (i.e. high
embankment fills).

The slope analysis is carried out by using software SLOPE/W GeoStudio a computer program
developed by GEO-SLOPE International Ltd. All the slope analysis is based on Morgenstern-
Price Method assuming circular slip failure surfaces which satisfy both in moment equilibrium
and force equilibrium of the slope as per the design brief. The followings are factors that
considered in slope stability analysis:

a) Total loadings as mentioned in Section 3.4 is used to stimulate the superimposed dead load
and train live load (normal and extreme condition).
b) The design slope gradient is 1V:2H with 3m berm width at every 6m height.
c) Ground water table at 1m b.g.l.

The output of the stability analysis is enclosed in Appendix D. The summary of the slope
stability analysis is shown in Table 5.1 below.

FOS FOS
Height of
Depth of (Normal (Extreme
No. Chainage Fill Slope
R&R (m) Train Live Train Live
(m)
Load) Load)
1 748050 2.5 4.1 2.010 1.938
2 747625 3.0 2.4 2.381 2.246
3 749550 3.5 1.1 2.812 2.564

Table 5.1 Summary of Slope Stability Analysis (R&R)

 Design, Construction, Supply, Installation, Completion, Testing, Commissioning and
CRCC – CREC –
Maintenance of Electrified Double Track from Gemas to Johor Bahru
CCCC CONSORTIUM
SDN. BHD. GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR
BLOCK 15 (KEMPAS BARU TO JOHOR BAHRU STATION)
Doc No :GJBEDTP/R/CRJGR/DR/SIPY-SSP/S5.0/GEO/31001 Rev. B Date:02/07/19 Page:11

5.3 SURCHARGE PRELOADING WITH PARTIAL R&R

5.3.1 GENERAL

Surcharge preloading is basically the earth fill carried out on top of the embankment to impose
a preload to stimulate the anticipated future loads and to accelerate settlement. The excess
surcharge material is removed once preloading is completed. To ensure that the construction
program can be planned effectively, the preloading is carried out together with R&R.

Partial removal and replacement up to 3m or slightly more has been adopted on soil where
thick soft materials are encountered. The remaining weak soil (MP blows between 20 and 40)
shall be treated with surcharge to ensure meeting the settlement requirements. A surcharge fill
will be placed over the embankment to accelerate the settlements of the remaining weak soil.
As mention in the previous section, areas with thick soft soil which required partial R&R with
preload are localized. The extent of the ground treatment areas was identified and listed in
Appendix C.

5.3.2 PRIMARY SETTLEMENT

Settlement analysis has been carried out for critical sections based on embankment height,
thickness of R&R and remaining weak soil. Total settlement at the end of surcharge period and
the remaining residual settlement are summarised in Table 5.2 below.

The detailed settlement analysis and the time rate settlement are shown in Appendix E.
 Design, Construction, Supply, Installation, Completion, Testing, Commissioning and
CRCC – CREC –
Maintenance of Electrified Double Track from Gemas to Johor Bahru
CCCC CONSORTIUM
SDN. BHD. GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR
BLOCK 15 (KEMPAS BARU TO JOHOR BAHRU STATION)
Doc No :GJBEDTP/R/CRJGR/DR/SIPY-SSP/S5.0/GEO/31001 Rev. B Date:02/07/19 Page:12

Total Total Residual

Height of Depth Remaining Rest
Surcharge Settlement at Settlement
No. Chainage Fill Slope of R&R Weak Period
Height (m) End of Rest during Service
(m) (m) Layer (m) (months)
Period (mm) (mm)
1 747350 2.8 1.0 3.5 1.0 3.5 275.0 23.6
2 751725 2.3 2.0 3.7 1.0 3.5 246.0 25.0
3 747125 3.0 3.0 1.4 1.0 1.0 114.0 3.2

Table 5.2 Summary of Settlement Analysis and Time Rate Settlement (R&R+S)
 Design, Construction, Supply, Installation, Completion, Testing, Commissioning and
CRCC – CREC –
Maintenance of Electrified Double Track from Gemas to Johor Bahru
CCCC CONSORTIUM
SDN. BHD. GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR
BLOCK 15 (KEMPAS BARU TO JOHOR BAHRU STATION)
Doc No :GJBEDTP/R/CRJGR/DR/SIPY-SSP/S5.0/GEO/31001 Rev. B Date:02/07/19 Page:13

5.3.3 SLOPE STABILITY

Stability analysis has been carried out on embankment with critical conditions where the
embankment fills are the highest.

The slope analysis is carried out by using software SLOPE/W GeoStudio a computer program
developed by GEO-SLOPE International Ltd. All the slope analysis is based on Morgenstern-
Price Method assuming circular slip failure surfaces which satisfy both in moment equilibrium
and force equilibrium of the slope as per the design brief. The followings are factors that
considered in slope stability analysis:

a) For short term stability check, 10kPa surcharge is considered as construction load on top of
the final surcharge level.
b) For long term, total loadings as mentioned in Section 3.4 are used to stimulate the
superimposed dead load and train live load (normal and extreme condition).
c) The design slope gradient is 1V:2H with 3m berm width at every 6m height.
d) Ground water table at 1m b.g.l.
e) Undrained parameter with gain in strength is adopted for weak layer for long term condition.

The output of the stability analysis is enclosed in Appendix D. The summary of the slope
stability analysis is shown in Table 5.3 below.
 Design, Construction, Supply, Installation, Completion, Testing, Commissioning and
CRCC – CREC –
Maintenance of Electrified Double Track from Gemas to Johor Bahru
CCCC CONSORTIUM
SDN. BHD. GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR
BLOCK 15 (KEMPAS BARU TO JOHOR BAHRU STATION)
Doc No :GJBEDTP/R/CRJGR/DR/SIPY-SSP/S5.0/GEO/31001 Rev. B Date:02/07/19 Page:14

Height of Fill Slope (m)

Surcharge Height (m)

FOS for Slope Stability FOS for Bearing* FOS for Sliding*

Depth of R&R (m)

Remaining Weak
Long Term Long Term Long Term

Layer (m)
Chainage

No.
Short Normal Extreme Short Normal Extreme Short
Normal
Term Train Train Term Train Train Term
Train Live
Live Live Live Live
Load
Load Load Load Load

1 747350 2.8 1.0 3.5 1.0 1.359 1.699 1.576 1.543 1.912 1.820 1.23 1.50

2 751725 2.3 2.0 3.7 1.0 1.544 1.898 1.745 1.743 2.139 2.013 1.40 1.65

3 747125 3.0 3.0 1.4 1.0 1.601 1.725 1.642 1.810 2.062 1.970 1.41 1.60
*additional sliding and bearing check as requested by ICC

Table 5.3 Summary of Slope Stability Analysis (R&R+S)

 Design, Construction, Supply, Installation, Completion, Testing, Commissioning and
CRCC – CREC –
Maintenance of Electrified Double Track from Gemas to Johor Bahru
CCCC CONSORTIUM
SDN. BHD. GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR
BLOCK 15 (KEMPAS BARU TO JOHOR BAHRU STATION)
Doc No :GJBEDTP/R/CRJGR/DR/SIPY-SSP/S5.0/GEO/31001 Rev. B Date:02/07/19 Page:15

5.4 STONE COLUMN

Vibro replacement (Stone Column) is adopted when the soft or unsuitable layer exceeds 6m.
The locations of stone column are summarized in Table 5.4.

Chainage Length of Highest

Thickness of
Treatment Embankment
Treatment (m)
(m) Fill (m)
From To

747375 747625 250 7.4 13.5

749275 749550 275 5.1 7.5
750025 750250 225 4.7 7.5
750750 751125 375 4.9 10.0

Table 5.4: Summary of Stone Column

The treatment involves the construction of stone column at a regular spacing range between
2.5m to 1.7m. The column spacing was designed on the basis of slope stability calculation to
assure a safety factor greater than 1.5. A square grid pattern is proposed with the diameter of
column of 1.0m. The detail calculations for the composite soil are shown in Appendix D while
the summary of the design spacing for the stone column is as tabulated in Table 5.5 below:

Chainage Spacing of Stone Column (m)

From To Under Carriage Way Under Side Slopes

747375 747625 2.0 2.0

749275 749550 2.0 1.7
750025 750250 2.0 1.7
750750 751125 1.7 1.7

Table 5.5: Summary of Design Spacing for Stone Column

Stability and settlement analysis have been carried out for critical sections based on
embankment height and weak soil. The output of the stability analysis is enclosed in Appendix
D. The summary of the slope stability is shown in Table 5.6 below.
 Design, Construction, Supply, Installation, Completion, Testing, Commissioning and
CRCC – CREC –
Maintenance of Electrified Double Track from Gemas to Johor Bahru
CCCC CONSORTIUM
SDN. BHD. GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR
BLOCK 15 (KEMPAS BARU TO JOHOR BAHRU STATION)
Doc No :GJBEDTP/R/CRJGR/DR/SIPY-SSP/S5.0/GEO/31001 Rev. B Date:02/07/19 Page:16

FOS
Thickness of Height of
No. Chainage Treatment Fill Slope Treated Condition
(m) (m) Existing
Normal Extreme
Condition
Train Live Train Live
Load Load
1 750850 10 4.9 1.105 2.182 2.106
2 747425 13.5 7.4 0.745 1.818 1.786

Table 5.6: Summary of Slope Stability Analysis (Stone Column Area)

5.5 PILED EMBANKMENT

5.3.4 GENERAL

Depending on soil condition, piles are proposed at locations with relatively high embankment
and thick soft soil areas where all previous methods are not able to meet the stability or
settlement requirements. The piles will generally be required to be driven to refusal in order to
achieved the requirement working load. The load of the embankment is transferred to the piles
through a raft design to meet the structural requirements. The summary of pile working load
and raft design is presented in Table 5.7 for reference. Detailed calculations of pile capacity
and raft are presented in Appendix F for reference.

Pile Slab
Embankment
Height (m) Size Working Spacing Thickness Reinforcement
(mm) Load (kN) (m) (mm) (T&B)
3.0 250 600 2.45 425 T12 - 200
4.0 250 600 2.25 425 T12 - 200
5.0 250 600 2.10 425 T12 - 200

6.0 250 600 1.95 425 T12 - 200

7.0 250 600 1.80 425 T12 - 200

8.0 250 600 1.70 425 T12 - 200

9.0 250 600 1.65 425 T12 - 200

10.0 250 600 1.55 425 T12 – 200

11.0 250 600 1.50 425 T12 – 200

12.0 250 600 1.45 425 T12 – 200

 Design, Construction, Supply, Installation, Completion, Testing, Commissioning and
CRCC – CREC –
Maintenance of Electrified Double Track from Gemas to Johor Bahru
CCCC CONSORTIUM
SDN. BHD. GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR
BLOCK 15 (KEMPAS BARU TO JOHOR BAHRU STATION)
Doc No :GJBEDTP/R/CRJGR/DR/SIPY-SSP/S5.0/GEO/31001 Rev. B Date:02/07/19 Page:17

Table 5.7 Summary of Piled Embankment Design (PE)

5.6 GEOTECHNICAL INSTRUMENTATION

In order to ensure that the design criteria are fulfilled, instrumentations can be utilized for
monitoring purposes. Types of instruments that shall be installed at ground treatment locations
are as follows:

a. Settlement markers (SM) : To measure the settlement at the top of

finished embankment or top of surcharge.

b. Displacement markers (DM) : To measure the lateral movement of the

embankment toe.

c. Rod Settlement Gauge (RSG) : To measure the settlement of the original

ground due to embankment and surcharge
filling.

d. Inclinometers (INC) : To measure any lateral movement of the

subsoil during or after any earthworks.
e. Pneumatic Piezometer : To measure pore water pressure in saturated
soils during or after any earthworks.

Rod settlement gauges (RG) shall be installed at the original ground at spacing of 100m
(staggered) and settlement markers (SM) shall be installed at the top of embankment at spacing
of 100m (staggered), unless otherwise stated in the drawings, for the following locations:
- partial removal
- stone columns areas

Inclinometers and displacement markers shall be installed at the edge of the side slope to monitor
the lateral subsoil displacement. RSG/SM and DM readings shall be used to plot the Matsuo chart
during the filling works. With the monitoring results, the rate of filling can be controlled to prevent
triggering of slip.
 Design, Construction, Supply, Installation, Completion, Testing, Commissioning and
CRCC – CREC –
Maintenance of Electrified Double Track from Gemas to Johor Bahru
CCCC CONSORTIUM
SDN. BHD. GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR
BLOCK 15 (KEMPAS BARU TO JOHOR BAHRU STATION)
Doc No :GJBEDTP/R/CRJGR/DR/SIPY-SSP/S5.0/GEO/31001 Rev. B Date:02/07/19 Page:18

The frequencies for monitoring shall be as detailed in the table below:

Activity / Stage Frequency of Monitoring
During Filling  Once a week (weekly)
(for rod settlement gauge)
 Once a week (weekly) for the first 3 months

After final embankment  Twice a month (fortnightly) for subsequent 3 months and
 Once a month (monthly) until finishing of track

Defects liability period (DLP)  Once a month (monthly)

Table 5.8: Summary of Instrumentations Monitoring Schedule

Asaoka plot will be used to monitor the progress and predict the final settlement. Surcharge of soil
will be implemented to accelerate the settlement if the criteria are not fulfilled.

6.0 FOUNDATION ASSESSMENT

6.1 SHALLOW FOUNDATION FOR BOX CULVERT (BC)

Shallow foundation is often considered for foundation design due to wide and long geometry of
VBC base area. Safe bearing pressure is calculated using Meyerhof equation given below.
Qall = (c Nc + q Nq + 1/2 Y B Nγ) / FS

Qall = Allowable bearing capacity

c = Effective shear strength
Nc = Bearing capacity factor
q = Effective overburden pressure
Nq = Bearing capacity factor
Y = Bulk unit weight
B = Width of foundation
Nγ = Bearing capacity factor
FS = Factor of safety

Locations of Box Culvert (BC) and allowable safe bearing pressure for Block 15 are
summarised in Table 6.1 below.
 Design, Construction, Supply, Installation, Completion, Testing, Commissioning and
CRCC – CREC –
Maintenance of Electrified Double Track from Gemas to Johor Bahru
CCCC CONSORTIUM
SDN. BHD. GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR
BLOCK 15 (KEMPAS BARU TO JOHOR BAHRU STATION)
Doc No :GJBEDTP/R/CRJGR/DR/SIPY-SSP/S5.0/GEO/31001 Rev. B Date:02/07/19 Page:19

Required Soil
Soil Bearing
BC Bearing Ground
Chainages Size SI Reference Capacity
No. Capacity 2 Treatment
(kN/m )
(kN/m²)

BC275 746.379 3.30 x 3.00 5DBH-109 230.19 860.8 Partial R&R

BC276 747.071 2.40 x 2.10 5DBH-110 211.70 687.0 Partial R&R
BC277 747.519 6.00 x 4.20 5DBH-111 347.87 1533.3 Stone Column
BC278 748.634 3.00 x 3.00 5DBH-117 295.87 498.1 -
BC279 748.957 2.10 x 1.80 5DBH-118 208.30 412.7 -
BC280 749.298 6.00 x 4.20 5DBH-119 277.35 1237.1 Stone Column
BC281 750.119 4.50 x 4.50 5DBH-122 255.40 1026.6 Stone Column
BC282 750.482 2.10 x 1.80 5DBH-123 334.42 414.1 Partial R&R
BC283 750.84 6.00 x 4.20 5DBH-124 347.87 1487.5 Stone Column
BC284 751.73 3.00 x 2.70 5DBH-127 222.94 775.2 Partial R&R
BC285 752.703 2.70 x 2.70 5DBH-130 220.39 638.8 Partial R&R
BC286 753.115 2.40 x 2.40 5DBH-131 315.49 470.8 -
386.9 Remove and
BC287 753.457 1.80 x 1.50 5DBH-132
363.60 Replace
BC288 754.017 4.50 x 3.90 5DBH-135 282.49 680.2 -
Table 6.1: Summary of Box Culverts.
*300mm thick crusher run to be provided at the base
 The required Soil Bearing Capacity is at the base of the Box Culvert
 The Allowable Bearing Capacity is calculated inclusive of the backfill above the box culvert.

For Box Culvert where the allowable bearing capacity is not achievable, a 300mm crusher run
will be layed on the existing ground before the casting of box culvert. Plate load test will be
carried out after wards to justify on the actual bearing capacity. Basal reinforcement will be
proposed if the results are not favourable.

7.0 RETAINING STRUCTURES

Reinforced Concrete wall (RC), and Reinforced Earth Soil Wall (RS) are proposed at locations
along the track where there are space constraints or to avoid encroaching Right of Way (ROW)
and existing road. Locations and the required height of retaining wall along Block 15 area are
summarised in Table 7.1 below.

The stability of retaining structures adopted for this project shall achieve the following criteria:
 Design, Construction, Supply, Installation, Completion, Testing, Commissioning and
CRCC – CREC –
Maintenance of Electrified Double Track from Gemas to Johor Bahru
CCCC CONSORTIUM
SDN. BHD. GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR
BLOCK 15 (KEMPAS BARU TO JOHOR BAHRU STATION)
Doc No :GJBEDTP/R/CRJGR/DR/SIPY-SSP/S5.0/GEO/31001 Rev. B Date:02/07/19 Page:20

 Overturning Stability (FOS ≥ 2.0)

 Sliding Stability (FOS ≥ 1.5)
 Bearing Capacity (FOS ≥ 3.0)
 Overall Stability (FOS ≥ 1.5)

Reinforced Earth Soil (RS) wall shall be design by specialist contractor to obtain satisfy internal
stability.
 Design, Construction, Supply, Installation, Completion, Testing, Commissioning and
CRCC – CREC –
Maintenance of Electrified Double Track from Gemas to Johor Bahru
CCCC CONSORTIUM
SDN. BHD. GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR
BLOCK 15 (KEMPAS BARU TO JOHOR BAHRU STATION)
Doc No :GJBEDTP/R/CRJGR/DR/SIPY-SSP/S5.0/GEO/31001 Rev. B Date:02/07/19 Page:21

Chainage Retaining Wall Information

Allowable
Approximate Type of Wall Type Reference Bearing
ID LHS/RHS Cut/Fill App. Total (based on Ground Treatment
From To Length Wall SI Capacity
Height typical (kN/m2)
drawing)
B15-01 747435 747505 70 RHS FILL RC/RS 3.8 F4 5DBH-111 230 Stone Column

B15-02 747680 747905 225 RHS CUT CBP&RS 5.3 C5 5DBH-111 215 -

Remove and
B15-03 748060 748115 55 RHS FILL RC/RS 3.8 F4 5DBH-112 230
Replace

B15-04 749405 749465 60 RHS FILL RC/RS 2.8 F3 5DBH-119 200 Stone Column

B15-05 749665 749765 100 RHS CUT RS 3.5 C4 5DBH-120 180 -

B15-06 749795 749830 35 RHS CUT RC/RS 3.0 C3 5DBH-120 190 -
B15-07 750120 750140 20 RHS FILL RC 1.8 F2 5DBH-122 155 Stone Column
B15-07a 751985 752015 30 RHS CUT RC 2.0 C2 - 155 -
B15-08 752060 752210 150 RHS CUT RS 5.5 C5 ABH-141 220 -
B15-09 752240 752270 30 RHS CUT RS 4.0 C4 5DBH-128 190 -
B15-10 752723 752735 12 RHS FILL RC 2.0 F2 5DBH-130 155 Partial R&R
B15-11 752880 753055 175 LHS CUT RS 4.0 C4 ABH-142 190 -
B15-12 753240 753410 170 LHS CUT RS 3.5 C4 ABH-143 180 -
B15-13 753515 753555 40 LHS CUT RC/RS 3.0 C3 ABH-143 190 -
B15-13a 754070 754115 45 LHS CUT RS 4.0 C4 5DBH-136 190 -
Table 7.1: Summary of Retaining Wall
 Design, Construction, Supply, Installation, Completion, Testing, Commissioning and
CRCC – CREC –
Maintenance of Electrified Double Track from Gemas to Johor Bahru
CCCC CONSORTIUM
SDN. BHD. GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR
BLOCK 15 (KEMPAS BARU TO JOHOR BAHRU STATION)
Doc No :GJBEDTP/R/CRJGR/DR/SIPY-SSP/S5.0/GEO/31001 Rev. B Date:02/07/19 Page:22

8.0 CONCLUSIONS

Detailed study, analysis and design calculation has been carried out to ensure that the
proposed railway embankment can be safely constructed and also ensuring that the completed
embankment be able to satisfy the required performance criteria. The following conclusions can
be made:
a. Generally, the subsoil can be categorised into two relatively distinct layers which consists
of very soft Silt-Clay and medium dense to hard sandy Silty Sand along the alignment in
Block 15.

b. The proposed ground treatment scheme for the project consists ground improvement with
complete R&R, surcharge preloading with R&R , stone column and piled embankment. The
reason for adopting the relevant type of ground treatment along the alignment have been
discussed in detail in the above sections.

c. Stability check carried out at the complete R&R area shows that the slope stability satisfied
the minimum FOS requirement.

d. Stability analysis carried out for partial R&R and stone column with surcharge satisfied the
minimum FOS requirement for both short term and long term.

e. Geotechnical instrumentation is proposed to be installed to monitor the performance of the

ground treatment scheme. The proposed geotechnical instrumentation is discussed in above
section.
 APPENDIX A
SUBSOIL PROFILE & SI LABORATORY TEST RESULT
 Summary Of Mackintosh Probe Result
Depth (m) MP - 1896 MP - 1897 MP - 1898 MP - 1899 MP - 1900 MP - 1901 MP - 1902 MP - 1903 MP - 1904 MP - 1905 MP - 1906 MP - 1907 MP - 1908 MP - 1909 MP - 1910 MP - 1911 MP - 1912 MP - 1913 MP - 1914 MP - 1915 MP - 1916 MP - 1917 MP - 1918 MP - 1919 MP - 1920

0.3 52 32 42 43 52 33 39 49 32 41 32 72 74 15 24 27 34 15 10 32 53 42 16 32 132
0.6 63 43 59 29 69 23 22 29 77 26 45 46 56 21 28 31 32 31 13 42 40 73 21 18 102
0.9 42 22 33 53 23 49 53 20 89 34 32 36 42 21 36 42 28 42 24 53 32 46 16 22 75
1.2 29 56 29 50 42 52 42 33 22 53 27 26 32 22 20 50 36 32 17 31 38 54 23 28 43
1.5 53 78 43 63 37 33 53 45 43 44 20 20 38 19 26 34 28 38 22 38 46 62 46 36 32
1.8 30 92 90 29 59 43 44 32 56 32 31 42 46 28 34 38 37 27 28 26 57 32 53 42 46
2.1 49 53 23 50 32 23 53 52 78 20 74 54 51 36 54 46 62 28 31 34 50 38 46 57 57
2.4 45 24 39 39 78 42 63 78 90 28 63 61 52 42 50 75 54 34 42 36 30 42 56 64 36
2.7 39 50 43 40 53 59 29 22 77 34 54 60 58 53 61 62 44 36 32 34 32 56 46 32 42
3.0 23 78 52 53 29 39 72 52 29 54 41 34 70 46 53 34 48 37 42 45 30 75 75 46 50
3.3 33 39 56 66 30 52 78 39 53 32 47 38 62 46 58 51 50 64 48 57 44 73 36 56 64
3.6 45 40 39 78 45 43 39 27 44 41 32 42 54 50 74 57 53 56 36 62 49 54 45 70 73
3.9 52 53 53 90 78 40 45 45 44 36 45 68 50 72 63 50 64 57 45 38 79 62 72 38 56
4.2 63 89 49 93 122 29 29 46 56 47 56 76 61 51 86 63 54 68 62 42 54 56 42 42 46
4.5 78 125 39 152 183 32 32 78 78 82 75 83 72 58 75 74 70 73 73 48 63 58 53 48 48
4.8 90 143 40 143 190 53 45 56 29 73 70 87 74 42 63 63 83 78 54 50 75 70 68 56 62
5.1 83 168 59 189 253 29 34 27 22 64 83 129 84 38 74 74 86 63 46 56 60 79 33 72 57
5.4 92 178 70 173 278 53 78 43 56 56 139 145 86 46 63 68 106 75 73 63 78 84 34 68 62
5.7 124 190 63 190 292 89 56 21 77 137 76 106 76 130 68 132 74 84 62 86 70 93 54 75 62
6.0 135 245 43 214 353 125 67 78 63 70 84 175 131 72 70 154 131 93 75 131 84 157 56 69 133
6.3 183 235 73 256 400 143 89 125 89 62 93 243 152 63 76 131 150 77 128 72 93 102 74 132 146
6.6 160 276 89 278 162 125 189 122 154 130 286 164 68 83 156 162 86 156 84 76 76 63 145 175
6.9 243 300 93 311 189 183 182 156 175 136 294 172 74 103 187 168 67 172 89 143 130 54 130 246
7.2 233 342 125 400 245 144 244 189 236 156 332 189 160 174 245 177 74 151 124 162 152 62 180 275
7.5 253 400 143 288 167 300 245 287 174 349 246 131 162 286 196 86 246 152 174 166 57 245 346
7.8 278 159 342 214 400 256 294 241 400 275 156 197 274 245 132 276 189 246 170 58 264 400
8.1 320 167 400 256 278 303 286 281 172 246 368 280 164 289 202 275 168 62 315
8.4 400 189 278 310 348 267 362 183 287 400 274 154 329 256 294 192 50 346
8.7 243 288 400 400 328 400 197 331 293 170 354 275 369 246 74 400
9.0 262 323 400 241 372 338 189 400 269 400 276 78
9.3 289 400 256 400 356 274 294 287 94
9.6 311 275 400 400 400 341 107
9.9 400 281 368 186
10.2 367 400 174
10.5 400 246
10.8 326
11.1 400
11.4
11.7
12.0
12.3
12.6
12.9
13.2
13.5
13.8
14.1
14.4
14.7
15.0
 Summary Of Mackintosh Probe Result
Depth (m) MP - 1921 MP - 1922 MP - 1923 MP - 1924 MP - 1925 MP - 1926 MP - 1927 MP - 1928 MP - 1929 MP - 1930 MP - 1931 MP - 1932 MP - 1933 MP - 1934 MP - 1935 MP - 1936 MP - 1937 MP - 1938 MP - 1939 MP - 1940 MP - 1941 MP - 1942 MP - 1943 MP - 1944 MP - 1945

0.3 85 32 43 63 42 32 46 32 32 25 20 34 53 43 53 78 36 32 10 34 21 10 52 45 53
0.6 15 20 32 46 48 41 36 42 46 13 24 43 42 45 56 62 78 10 16 32 23 7 32 63 42
0.9 10 24 64 32 31 32 41 42 22 41 31 53 33 32 43 44 42 12 21 28 42 5 38 36 18
1.2 16 36 38 41 30 23 45 22 28 22 32 32 27 38 28 33 19 15 16 46 29 13 40 42 22
1.5 22 42 44 32 42 44 63 28 16 19 20 45 36 42 36 29 12 24 13 33 33 21 40 45 16
1.8 28 34 46 46 30 48 44 36 21 25 25 32 36 53 37 50 24 14 15 42 39 18 39 32 13
2.1 31 38 32 51 42 57 58 42 24 36 26 38 42 43 35 53 25 24 20 31 42 24 44 38 24
2.4 42 44 38 52 51 62 32 56 36 27 27 42 48 32 42 70 34 76 23 46 53 16 33 26 35
2.7 56 56 41 34 56 46 27 77 42 36 28 56 97 38 56 83 35 46 24 46 52 17 34 37 22
3.0 46 50 32 37 72 36 28 62 56 45 31 73 63 35 75 29 29 32 34 54 43 10 57 86 28
3.3 45 33 42 36 62 44 36 68 75 32 42 62 54 42 64 40 30 38 35 31 33 23 62 45 34
3.6 32 39 46 45 34 58 42 40 36 38 48 45 62 35 30 83 45 44 45 56 49 24 56 62 28
3.9 38 76 37 130 54 53 152 56 65 42 32 49 57 73 53 92 49 45 87 46 52 25 76 56 23
4.2 42 46 61 62 57 54 93 77 62 57 54 57 68 64 43 99 70 60 62 73 53 28 78 83 44
4.5 57 72 68 43 63 57 98 76 54 62 60 68 73 57 49 125 66 68 65 75 66 36 64 93 56
4.8 58 64 45 57 73 67 60 86 46 38 75 69 60 55 57 136 89 86 76 142 79 41 75 82 57
5.1 72 72 54 68 46 66 67 64 75 42 62 75 86 62 86 142 79 75 83 70 32 57 83 72 63
5.4 64 65 62 73 56 57 86 57 68 48 46 79 87 74 75 189 23 46 89 86 43 86 102 138 84
5.7 58 74 66 63 75 103 119 68 74 62 45 83 134 75 60 256 89 157 74 74 63 74 141 76 57
6.0 46 93 67 77 64 72 120 110 65 54 76 73 153 86 107 277 124 76 75 85 79 93 125 75 124
6.3 72 98 97 103 150 46 164 124 76 73 83 130 143 76 70 266 156 152 91 120 83 151 134 86 154
6.6 62 103 89 143 132 131 176 154 57 62 47 156 187 130 142 289 157 162 96 134 121 132 156 136 162
6.9 129 154 132 156 158 154 226 164 86 55 60 142 240 157 129 290 144 172 102 125 152 146 174 145 134
7.2 136 162 142 132 146 162 286 175 73 62 76 186 276 162 163 342 183 184 131 146 183 162 236 165 174
7.5 157 177 156 162 175 189 345 166 128 77 83 243 283 186 174 400 222 206 154 173 214 246 276 148 262
7.8 144 189 172 183 232 246 400 186 136 70 103 262 365 282 182 256 274 135 184 256 270 302 172 269
8.1 245 224 189 245 205 270 245 106 89 152 274 400 262 246 277 264 146 251 277 264 318 256 274
8.4 264 254 236 263 264 362 236 236 132 163 306 286 275 310 328 174 262 299 286 346 268 328
8.7 286 246 239 294 354 400 275 245 154 154 337 400 283 400 400 216 273 352 294 400 273 400
9.0 360 281 274 366 400 287 275 162 168 400 346 236 365 400 322 315
9.3 400 348 296 400 351 280 175 196 400 251 400 362 349
9.6 400 400 400 306 186 207 265 400 400
9.9 342 194 246 346
10.2 400 245 283 400
10.5 262 296
10.8 284 327
11.1 335 400
11.4 400
11.7
12.0
12.3
12.6
12.9
13.2
13.5
13.8
14.1
14.4
14.7
15.0
 Summary Of Mackintosh Probe Result
Depth (m) MP - 1946 MP - 1947 MP - 1948 MP - 1949 MP - 1950 MP - 1951 MP - 1952 MP - 1953 MP - 1954 MP - 1955 MP - 1956 MP - 1957 MP - 1958 MP - 1959 MP - 1960 MP - 1961 MP - 1962 MP - 1963 MP - 1964 MP - 1965 MP - 1966 MP - 1967 MP - 1968 MP - 1969 MP - 1970

0.3 13 10 54 73 56 121 73 43 28 22 16 34 42 53 5 51 86 27 46 40 32 38 22 32 53
0.6 15 15 36 53 73 35 45 37 10 17 12 15 36 46 10 16 137 16 29 30 42 38 16 18 32
0.9 16 14 45 20 24 14 64 46 13 10 23 9 41 72 9 12 53 18 17 38 32 43 21 20 42
1.2 22 6 52 26 34 45 57 32 18 9 12 17 12 27 10 15 34 12 27 45 16 32 17 26 32
1.5 4 13 46 42 25 57 36 24 32 11 13 16 15 19 30 7 52 10 18 35 18 28 16 36 28
1.8 13 10 40 30 34 65 42 28 16 12 12 11 24 17 15 12 70 13 16 42 22 35 22 38 36
2.1 14 15 73 37 38 46 31 36 19 12 14 18 31 22 13 15 52 21 17 46 28 39 20 42 37
2.4 15 9 76 44 58 53 30 42 20 12 18 16 35 36 41 52 59 17 13 57 36 45 19 46 45
2.7 9 18 54 40 45 88 30 31 31 16 27 22 30 45 60 49 73 21 23 73 42 67 25 72 107
3.0 10 23 36 54 68 83 44 22 22 17 22 36 41 28 42 62 72 32 27 38 57 51 36 64 46
3.3 17 25 45 50 56 93 56 20 16 16 15 21 34 49 65 56 33 46 36 42 58 64 42 50 56
3.6 21 26 75 70 55 79 73 28 28 21 19 36 35 57 65 74 28 32 48 46 44 49 56 32 73
3.9 24 25 68 76 75 146 45 37 36 16 28 42 42 84 74 68 18 40 37 57 63 47 83 38 46
4.2 23 47 73 83 40 142 50 43 41 18 29 45 32 93 54 77 81 73 58 63 45 52 97 44 53
4.5 34 42 46 64 56 183 76 56 20 17 34 36 61 75 65 139 136 56 46 74 46 79 68 56 45
4.8 38 29 72 57 78 197 82 44 26 19 42 45 68 68 74 156 77 82 72 62 53 94 146 72 62
5.1 44 37 80 130 97 236 73 73 31 23 53 62 58 132 134 177 94 76 46 68 42 125 72 46 57
5.4 45 54 130 145 132 274 64 45 38 43 42 68 77 72 150 188 83 60 57 56 62 64 76 69 63
5.7 62 40 154 136 128 279 57 68 42 38 56 74 80 162 163 137 102 97 83 74 73 68 84 73 115
6.0 73 45 180 156 146 281 86 70 56 62 78 86 145 184 251 168 156 105 93 83 78 97 136 83 73
6.3 75 76 245 170 175 326 93 68 75 45 92 133 168 193 264 246 162 145 130 62 74 118 154 87 78
6.6 83 105 257 183 251 400 125 57 60 67 125 154 198 268 328 256 183 126 154 134 86 137 172 124 62
6.9 145 150 315 206 262 136 103 53 76 142 174 236 273 356 274 250 236 168 145 97 154 168 156 84
7.2 136 183 400 274 284 157 146 83 56 163 203 249 283 400 282 271 274 193 128 128 182 236 132 126
7.5 181 245 268 338 183 176 152 83 145 246 256 325 340 359 286 246 173 145 224 245 181 176
7.8 231 270 256 400 240 189 144 131 180 274 352 400 400 400 339 275 166 193 293 273 230 184
8.1 275 293 334 268 246 120 154 256 280 400 400 328 189 236 347 306 275 236
8.4 284 314 400 316 275 176 132 277 362 400 261 276 400 371 284 267
8.7 345 400 400 284 183 162 310 400 264 350 400 296 362
9.0 400 302 252 186 400 277 400 328 400
9.3 356 262 245 330 400
9.6 400 281 268 342
9.9 368 277 400
10.2 400 324
10.5 362
10.8 400
11.1
11.4
11.7
12.0
12.3
12.6
12.9
13.2
13.5
13.8
14.1
14.4
14.7
15.0
 Summary Of Mackintosh Probe Result
Depth (m) MP - 1971 MP - 1972 MP - 1973 MP - 1974 MP - 1975 MP - 1976 MP - 1977 MP - 1978 MP - 1979 MP - 1980 MP - 1981 MP - 1982 MP - 1983 MP - 1984 MP - 1985 MP - 1986 MP - 1987 MP - 1988 MP - 1989 MP - 1990 MP - 1991

0.3 43 53 40 73 42 23 32 10 12 10 21 56 73 45 22 32 44 32 63 42 32
0.6 22 20 32 42 32 41 42 16 11 23 16 73 42 63 28 46 32 19 44 34 24
0.9 19 22 42 45 21 32 16 7 10 17 13 42 28 38 18 45 46 16 32 19 28
1.2 18 36 57 53 19 28 21 14 5 24 10 32 36 42 16 32 25 22 27 22 31
1.5 33 42 32 42 15 32 18 22 13 34 24 41 42 32 21 26 20 28 26 20 27
1.8 24 57 42 30 32 42 36 16 22 18 13 32 48 44 23 27 30 31 42 32 28
2.1 28 64 41 36 28 46 14 17 25 20 26 28 53 36 28 20 31 36 36 25 34
2.4 36 53 32 35 36 58 26 60 36 24 36 36 32 45 36 32 45 38 20 34 35
2.7 34 42 38 34 41 55 76 32 42 34 42 46 38 57 37 35 36 42 23 42 42
3.0 52 61 42 54 32 62 46 42 24 30 54 73 42 62 64 44 28 56 25 56 57
3.3 56 72 56 36 38 34 43 32 36 42 32 62 54 68 32 73 36 72 34 44 34
3.6 46 36 73 74 42 44 32 42 42 40 42 44 62 36 30 62 42 64 38 30 35
3.9 73 42 84 46 50 56 38 48 54 51 56 52 37 43 44 35 37 41 62 34 42
4.2 84 56 93 72 62 73 42 32 62 56 36 58 48 56 31 36 76 48 45 73 56
4.5 93 70 75 78 55 44 57 30 75 33 41 106 62 76 57 40 46 56 56 62 117
4.8 75 74 68 36 62 58 62 42 65 41 48 72 56 48 65 52 56 78 72 54 42
5.1 64 62 42 54 72 72 60 45 73 53 83 78 75 56 60 58 77 52 46 62 56
5.4 67 58 73 62 64 46 57 50 78 58 62 46 68 73 56 74 62 55 58 61 72
5.7 84 46 70 68 70 56 62 56 62 60 62 86 77 134 46 83 106 75 62 74 46
6.0 93 75 64 72 76 73 103 75 68 71 68 75 86 156 75 65 74 69 57 58 68
6.3 75 63 96 62 86 74 162 64 72 84 72 62 73 132 68 74 98 76 89 60 72
6.6 120 86 125 84 136 65 130 76 78 62 83 86 128 102 42 75 74 80 125 78 64
6.9 154 97 136 93 154 185 172 86 62 75 89 74 146 136 57 87 83 96 176 108 77
7.2 142 168 154 152 130 130 162 132 77 68 91 64 173 154 62 134 96 116 134 134 62
7.5 156 172 192 184 175 154 154 161 96 146 97 56 186 170 156 128 125 131 183 157 86
7.8 175 236 246 246 246 184 168 177 98 101 131 83 276 168 177 156 130 142 245 126 102
8.1 262 283 275 262 270 236 224 162 132 153 28 67 264 206 86 174 173 165 274 174 136
8.4 256 346 286 400 362 275 262 241 142 184 142 196 284 246 118 193 154 236 349 186 142
8.7 274 400 345 400 336 268 256 168 197 162 132 328 270 126 242 241 280 400 256 128
9.0 340 400 400 346 274 177 236 236 184 400 278 175 281 256 342 270 168
9.3 348 357 336 184 286 275 184 310 246 326 275 400 364 172
9.6 400 400 349 236 400 283 270 328 257 400 284 400 246
9.9 400 286 345 354 400 365 325 273
10.2 330 400 400 400 341 326
10.5 400 400 400
10.8
11.1
11.4
11.7
12.0
12.3
12.6
12.9
13.2
13.5
13.8
14.1
14.4
14.7
15.0
 ATTERBERG LIMITS PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION UU Triaxial
1-D Consolidation Rock Point CIU Triaxial Chemical Tests
Rock Compression
WATER STARTING ENDING SOIL SAMPLE DEPTH M/C passing Test Load
BH NO. BH EGL REMARK SPT'N RQD CRR SG LL PL PI GRAVEL SAND SILT CLAY PLT Total Effective Organic Chloride Total Sulphate pH
LEVEL DEPTH DEPTH DESCRIPTION NO. 425μ UCT Test
Void Pc C φ C φ C φ Content Content Sulphate Content Value
CC
m % % % % % % % % % Ratio kPa Mpa MPa kPa deg. MPa kPa deg. kPa deg. % % % mg/L
ABH-138 12.745 -2 S 1.5 1.95 5 SI/SN D1 1.50-1.95 29 41 28 13 0 59 14 27
S 4.5 4.95 14 SI/SN D3 6.00-6.45 26 69 41 28 16 42 15 27
S 6 6.45 19 SI/SN UD1 9.00-9.50 42 72 31 41 0 14 65 21 28 1
S 7.5 7.95 6 SI/SN D8 15.00-15.45 16 36 24 12 20 43 35 2
S 10.5 10.95 9 CL
S 12 12.45 27 CL
S 13.5 13.95 29 CL
S 15 15.45 50/300 CL/SN
S 16.5 16.83 50/180 CL/SN
S 18 18.33 50/180 CL/SN
S 19.5 19.81 50/155 CL/SN
S 21 21.3 50/145 CL/SN
S 22.5 22.79 50/135 CL/SN
S 24 24.265 50/115 CL/SN

ABH-139 9.226 -2.1 S 1.5 1.95 2 SI/SN UD1 3.00-3.50 18 49 31 18 0 58 35 7 30 2

S 4.5 4.95 8 CL/SN D3 6.00-6.45 28 70 30 40 6 46 17 31
S 6 6.45 9 CL/SN UD2 7.50-8.00 29 54 33 21 6 50 33 17 30 2
S 9 9.45 5 CL/SN D5 10.50-10.95 24 62 28 34 9 58 15 18
S 10.5 10.95 6 SN/CL D13 22.50-22.95 22 0 5 51 44
S 12 12.45 12 SN/CL/GR
S 13.5 13.95 17 SN/CL/GR
S 15 15.45 23 SN/CL/GR
S 16.5 16.95 26 SN/CL/GR
S 18 18.45 35 SN/CL/GR
S 19.5 19.95 39 SN/CL/GR
S 21 21.45 37 SN/CL/GR
S 22.5 22.92 50/265 SI
S 24 24.38 50/225 SI
S 25.5 25.81 50/160 SI

ABH-140 28.166 -2.3 S 1.5 1.95 4 SI/SN UD1 3.00-3.50 31 65 30 15 0 38 30 32 28 15 7 30

S 4.5 4.95 7 CL/SN UD2 6.00-6.50 24 51 32 19 0 48 43 9 34 14 5 31.5
S 7.5 7.95 11 SI/SN D5 10.50-10.95 25 50 22 28 0 56 6 38
S 9 9.45 13 SI/SN D8 15.00-15.45 24 53 25 28 0 12 47 41
S 10.5 10.95 9 CL/SN D13 22.50-22.95 26 0 14 23 63
S 12 12.45 14 SI/SN D17 28.50-28.95 21 0 26 74 0
S 13.5 13.95 15 SI/SN
S 15 15.45 21 CL
S 16.5 16.95 25 CL
S 18 18.45 24 SI/SN
S 19.5 19.95 25 SI/SN
S 21 21.45 25 SI/SN
S 22.5 22.95 28 SI
S 24 24.45 34 SI
S 25.5 25.95 35 SI
S 27 27.45 33 SI
S 28.5 28.89 50/235 SI
S 30 30.37 50/220 SI
S 31.5 31.85 50/200 SI
S 33 33.38 50/225 SI
S 34.5 34.84 50/190 SI
S 36 36.3 50/150 SI
S 37.5 37.785 50/135 SI
 ATTERBERG LIMITS PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION UU Triaxial
1-D Consolidation Rock Point CIU Triaxial Chemical Tests
Rock Compression
WATER STARTING ENDING SOIL SAMPLE DEPTH M/C passing Test Load
BH NO. BH EGL REMARK SPT'N RQD CRR SG LL PL PI GRAVEL SAND SILT CLAY PLT Total Effective Organic Chloride Total Sulphate pH
LEVEL DEPTH DEPTH DESCRIPTION NO. 425μ UCT Test
Void Pc C φ C φ C φ Content Content Sulphate Content Value
CC
m % % % % % % % % % Ratio kPa Mpa MPa kPa deg. MPa kPa deg. kPa deg. % % % mg/L
ABH-141 33 -6 S 1.5 1.95 2 SI/SN UD1 3.00-3.50 31 42 28 14 0 38 30 32 23 16 7 32
S 4.5 4.95 5 SI/SN UD2 6.00-6.50 24 40 29 11 0 48 43 9 30 14 5 34
S 7.5 7.95 7 SI/SN D4 10.50-10.95 22 45 22 23 26 39 29 6
S 10.5 10.95 6 SN/CL/GR D7 15.00-15.45 30 50 28 22 4 13 52 31
S 12 12.45 12 SN/CL/GR D13 24.00-24.45 20 11 46 39 4
S 13.5 13.95 16 SN/CL/GR D17 30.00-30.45 16 40 31 29 0
S 15 15.45 26 CL
S 16.5 16.95 27 CL
S 18 18.45 31 CL
S 19.5 19.95 32 CL
S 21 21.45 36 CL
S 22.5 22.95 38 CL
S 24 24.43 50/275 SI/SN
S 25.5 25.95 50/300 SI/SN
S 27 27.45 31 SI/SN
S 28.5 28.95 32 SI/SN
S 30 30.35 50/200 GR/SN/SI
S 31.5 31.95 32 GR/SN/SI
S 33 33.45 29 GR/SN/SI
S 34.5 34.95 37 GR/SN/SI
S 36 36.41 50/255 GR/SN/SI
S 37.5 37.95 50/300 GR/SN/SI
S 39 39.39 50/235 GR/SN/SI
S 40.5 10.85 50/200 GR/SN/SI
S 42 42.25 50/95 GR/SN/SI
S 43.5 43.81 50/160 GR/SN/SI
S 45 45.295 50/145 GR/SN/SI

ABH-142 25.214 -7.5 S 1.5 1.95 5 CL/SN UD1 3.00-3.50 33 69 36 33 0 19 66 15 25 15 9 27

S 4.5 4.95 6 SI UD2 6.00-6.50 30 50 30 20 0 53 30 17 27 14 9 32
S 7.5 7.95 8 SI/SN UD3 9.00-9.50 24 45 29 16 8 51 33 8 30 14 5 33
S 10.5 10.95 10 SI/SN D6 13.50-13.95 27 45 22 23 18 37 23 22
S 12 12.45 8 SI/SN D9 18.00-18.45 19 50 28 22 8 51 13 28
S 13.5 13.95 9 SI/SN
S 15 15.45 14 SI/SN
S 16.5 16.95 12 SI/SN
S 18 18.45 20 SI/SN
S 19.5 19.95 18 SI/SN
S 21 21.45 17 SI/SN
S 22.5 22.95 17 SI/SN
S 24 24.45 18 SI/SN
S 25.5 25.95 21 SI/SN
S 27 27.09 50/10 SI/SN
S 28.5 28.95 31 SI/SN
S 30 30.45 36 SI/SN
S 31.5 31.95 34 SI/SN
S 33 33.39 50/235 SI/SN
S 34.5 34.9 50/250 SI/SN
S 36 36.375 50/225 SI/SN

ABH-143 13.662 -6 S 1.5 1.95 3 SI/SN UD1 3.00-3.50 23 48 30 18 0 53 37 10 25 15 4 32

S 4.5 4.95 5 SI/SN UD2 6.00-6.50 23 43 28 15 0 59 33 8 33 14 7 33
S 7.5 7.95 8 SI/SN D4 9.00-9.45 28 27 16 11 5 59 3 33
S 9 9.45 7 CL/SN D6 12.00-12.45 21 8 60 10 22
S 10.5 10.95 10 CL/SN D7 16.50-16.95 23 21 50 11 18
S 12 12.45 12 SN/SI/GR
S 13.5 13.95 12 SN/SI/GR
S 15 15.45 18 SN/SI/GR
S 16.5 16.95 15 SN/SI/GR
S 18 18.45 16 SN/SI/GR
S 19.5 19.95 20 SN/SI/GR
S 21 21.45 14 SN/SI/GR
S 22.5 22.95 18 SN/SI/GR
S 24 24.45 23 SN/SI/GR
S 25.5 25.95 22 SN/SI/GR
S 27 27.4 50/245 SN/SI/GR
S 28.5 28.88 50/225 SN/SI/GR
S 30 30.21 50/60 SN/SI/GR
S 31.5 31.78 50/125 SN/SI/GR
S 33 33.26 50/105 SN/SI/GR
S 34.5 34.75 50/95 SN/SI/GR
S 36 36.225 50/75 SN/SI/GR
 ATTERBERG LIMITS PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION UU Triaxial
1-D Consolidation Rock Point CIU Triaxial Chemical Tests
Rock Compression
WATER STARTING ENDING SOIL SAMPLE DEPTH M/C passing Test Load
BH NO. BH EGL REMARK SPT'N RQD CRR SG LL PL PI GRAVEL SAND SILT CLAY PLT Total Effective Organic Chloride Total Sulphate pH
LEVEL DEPTH DEPTH DESCRIPTION NO. 425μ UCT Test
Void Pc C φ C φ C φ Content Content Sulphate Content Value
CC
m % % % % % % % % % Ratio kPa Mpa MPa kPa deg. MPa kPa deg. kPa deg. % % % mg/L
ABH-144 14.561 -4.5 S 3 3.45 4 SI/SN UD1 1.50-2.00 22 36 25 11 11 56 27 6
S 4.5 4.95 5 SI/SN UD2 6.00-6.50 23 39 26 13 8 56 29 7 33 14 5 32
S 7.5 7.95 7 SI/SN D6 12.00-12.45 26 22 13 9 4 52 13 31
S 9 9.45 9 SI/SN D10 18.00-18.45 28 0 9 56 35
S 10.5 10.95 14 SI/SN D12 21.00-21.45 23 5 61 14 20
S 12 12.45 15 CL/SN
S 13.5 13.95 16 CL/SN
S 15 15.45 20 CL/SN
S 16.5 16.95 23 CL/SN
S 18 18.45 19 SI
S 19.5 19.95 19 SI
S 21 21.45 22 SN/SI
S 22.5 22.95 25 SN/SI
S 24 24.45 28 SN/SI
S 25.5 25.95 30 SN/SI
S 27 27.45 19 SN/SI
S 28.5 28.95 31 SN/SI
S 30 30.45 36 SN/SI
S 31.5 31.95 50/300 SN/SI
S 33 33.38 50/225 SN/SI
S 34.5 34.84 50/190 SN/SI
S 36 36.31 50/160 SN/SI
S 37.5 37.78 50/125 SN/SI
S 39 39.26 50/105 SN/SI
S 40.5 40.73 50/75 SN/SI
S 42 42.125 50/70 SN/SI

ABH-145 7.181 -7.1 S 1.5 1.95 6 CL/SN D2 1.50-1.95 26 26 12 14 9 43 36 12

S 3 3.45 7 CL/SN UD1 6.00-6.70 32 62 29 33 0 38 40 22 30 13 5 29
S 4.5 4.95 8 CL/SN D6 9.00-9.45 21 9 85 6 0
S 7.5 7.95 8 CL D8 12.00-12.45 22 20 11 9 30 33 22 15
S 9 9.45 24 SN/GR/SI D11 16.50-16.95 21 NP NP NP 22 43 23 12
S 10.5 10.95 22 SN/GR/SI D15 22.50-22.95 19 24 50 11 15
S 12 12.45 23 CL/SN D19 28.50-28.95 28 39 34 18 9
S 13.5 13.95 28 CL/SN D25 37.50-37.95 28 0 66 22 12
S 15 15.45 29 CL/SN D28 42.00-42.45 21 15 60 11 14
S 16.5 16.95 33 CL/SN
S 18 18.45 19 SN/SI
S 19.5 19.95 22 SN/SI
S 21 21.45 31 SN/SI
S 22.5 22.95 37 SN/GR/SI
S 24 24.45 34 SN/GR/SI
S 25.5 25.95 38 SN/GR/SI
S 27 27.45 44 SN/GR/SI
S 28.5 28.95 50/300 GR/SI/SN
S 30 30.45 50/295 SN/SI
S 31.5 31.88 50/227 SN/SI
S 33 33.45 28 SN/CL
S 34.5 34.95 25 SN/CL
S 36 36.45 12 SN/SI
S 37.5 37.95 12 SN/SI
S 39 39.45 23 SN/SI
S 40.5 40.95 28 SN/SI
S 42 42.45 20 SN/SI
S 43.5 43.95 24 SN/SI
S 45 45.1 50/40 GR/SI
S 46.5 46.63 50/55 GR/SI
S 48 48.15 50/65 GR/SI
S 49.5 49.63 50/38 GR/SI
S 51 51.377 50/227 SI
 ATTERBERG LIMITS PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION UU Triaxial
1-D Consolidation Rock Point CIU Triaxial Chemical Tests
Rock Compression
WATER STARTING ENDING SOIL SAMPLE DEPTH M/C passing Test Load
BH NO. BH EGL REMARK SPT'N RQD CRR SG LL PL PI GRAVEL SAND SILT CLAY PLT Total Effective Organic Chloride Total Sulphate pH
LEVEL DEPTH DEPTH DESCRIPTION NO. 425μ UCT Test
Void Pc C φ C φ C φ Content Content Sulphate Content Value
CC
m % % % % % % % % % Ratio kPa Mpa MPa kPa deg. MPa kPa deg. kPa deg. % % % mg/L
ABH-146 4.916 -6.3 S 1.5 1.95 6 CL D3 3.00-3.45
S 3 3.45 4 CL UD1 4.50-5.20 26 64 29 35 0 5 75 20 30 14 10 26
S 6 6.45 17 CL D7 10.50-10.95 18 25 2 23 39 34 23 4
S 7.5 7.95 18 CL D11 16.50-16.95 26 2 28 23 47
S 9 9.45 23 GR/SN/SI D13 19.50-19.95 29 9 31 29 31
S 10.5 10.95 25 GR/SN/SI
S 12 12.45 9 CL/SN
S 13.5 13.95 11 CL/SN
S 15 15.45 16 CL
S 16.5 16.95 19 CL
S 18 18.45 36 SI/SN
S 19.5 19.95 36 SI/SN
S 21 21.45 23 SN
S 22.5 22.95 32 SN
S 24 24.45 28 SN
S 25.5 25.95 30 SN
S 27 27.45 28 SN
S 28.5 28.95 30 SN
S 30 30.45 22 CL
S 31.5 31.95 20 CL/SN
S 33 33.45 11 CL/SN
S 34.5 34.95 25 CL/SN
S 36 36.45 30 SI/SN
S 37.5 37.95 33 SI/SN
S 39 39.45 29 SN/SI
S 40.5 40.95 30 SN
S 42 42.45 20 CL
S 43.5 43.95 23 CL
S 45 45.45 50/295 SN/SN
S 46.5 46.95 50/295 SN/SN
S 48 48.375 50/225 SN/SN
 ATTERBERG LIMITS PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION Point Rock UU Triaxial
1-D Consolidation CIU Triaxial Chemical Tests
Compression Soil
WATER STARTING ENDING SOIL SAMPLE DEPTH M/C Passing Load Test
BH NO. BH EGL REMARK SPT'N RQD CRR SG LL PL PI GRAVEL SAND SILT CLAY Void UCT Total Effective Organic Chloride Total Sulphate pH
LEVEL DEPTH DEPTH DESCRIPTION NO. 425µ Pc CC Test UCT C Φ
Ratio C Φ C Φ Content Content Sulphate Content Value
m % % % % % % % % % kPa MPa MPa kPa deg. kPa kPa deg. kPa deg. % % % mg/L

5DBH-109 18.284 -2.4 S 1.5 1.95 2 P1/D2 1.50-1.95 29 47 31 16 2 51 35 12 1.32 <0.01 <0.01 4.7
S 3 3.45 3 P3/D4 4.50-4.95 37 50 31 19 3 45 35 17
S 4.5 4.95 2 P6/D7 9.00-9.45 27 39 28 11 10 34 41 15
S 6 6.45 11 P7/D8 10.50-10.95 16 NP NP NP 24 47 29
S 7.5 7.95 14 P9/D10 13.50-13.92 20 37 26 11 1 35 39 25
S 9 9.45 7
S 10.5 10.95 19
S 12 12.45 21
S 13.5 13.92 50/270
S 15 15.335 50/205
S 16.5 16.915 50/260
S 18 18.395 50/245
S 19.5 19.725 50/110
S 21 21.125 50/55
S 22.5 22.615 50/55
LOG 0 1.5 CL/SN/GR
LOG 1.5 3 SI/SN
LOG 3 4.5 CL/SN
LOG 4.5 6 SI/SN
LOG 6 9 CL/SN/GR
LOG 9 10.5 SI/SN
LOG 10.5 12 SN/SI
LOG 12 13.5 SI/SN/GR
LOG 13.5 18 SI/SN
LOG 18 22.615 SI/SN/GR

5DBH-110 19.745 -2.1 S 1.5 1.95 1 P1/D2 1.50-1.95 45 64 35 29 4 29 45 22 3.25 <0.01 <0.01 4.9
S 3 3.45 0 U3 1 3.50-4.50 34 53 33 20 12 47 30 11 0.975 26 0.262 20 26
S 4.5 4.95 50/300 P3/D4 4.50-4.95 17 NP NP NP 3 84 13
S 6 6.45 19 P5/D6 7.50-7.95 27 47 31 16 18 47 26 9
S 7.5 7.95 6 P6/D7 9.00-9.45 29 47 31 16 12 30 41 17
S 9 9.45 4
S 10.5 10.9 50/250
S 12 12.1 50/60
S 13.5 13.86 50/210
S 15 15.27 50/120
S 16.5 16.8 50/150
S 18 18.275 50/145
S 19.5 19.675 50/100
LOG 0 1.5 SI/SN
LOG 1.5 3.5 CL/SI/WOOD
LOG 3.5 4 CL/SI/SN
LOG 4 4.5 SN/SI/WOOD
LOG 4.5 7.5 SN/SI
LOG 7.5 9 CL/SN
LOG 9 12 SI/SN
LOG 12 13.5 SN/SI/GR
LOG 13.5 19.675 SI/SN

5DBH-111 11.251 -1.9 S 1.5 1.95 0 P1/D2 1.50-1.95 20 NP NP NP 0 67 33 0.12 <0.01 <0.01 6.7
S 3 3.45 1 U3-1 2.00-3.00 23 46 25 21 21 37 13 29 0.698 76 0.436 68 10
S 6 6.45 2 P4/D5 6.00-6.45 24 47 25 22 0 49 18 33
S 7.5 7.95 4 P7/D8 10.50-10.95 21 38 21 17 17 45 11 27
S 9 9.45 36 P9/D10 13.50-13.95 24 43 25 18 3 14 34 49
S 10.5 10.95 6
S 12 12.45 8
S 13.5 13.95 28
S 15 15.143 50/65
S 16.5 16.73 50/80
S 18 18.245 50/120
S 19.5 19.745 50/115
S 21 21.3 50/150
S 22.5 22.655 50/75
S 24 24.365 50/215
LOG 0 1.5 CL/SN
LOG 1.5 2 CL/SN/GR
LOG 2 3 CL/SN
LOG 3 4.5 CL/SN/GR
LOG 4.5 6 CL/SI
LOG 6 7.5 CL/SN/ROOTS
LOG 7.5 9 CL/SN
LOG 9 10.5 SN/SI
LOG 10.5 12 CL/SI
LOG 12 13.5 CL/SN/GR
LOG 13.5 15 CL/SI/GR
LOG 15 24.365 SI/SN/GR
 ATTERBERG LIMITS PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION Point Rock UU Triaxial
1-D Consolidation CIU Triaxial Chemical Tests
Compression Soil
WATER STARTING ENDING SOIL SAMPLE DEPTH M/C Passing Load Test
BH NO. BH EGL REMARK SPT'N RQD CRR SG LL PL PI GRAVEL SAND SILT CLAY Void UCT Total Effective Organic Chloride Total Sulphate pH
LEVEL DEPTH DEPTH DESCRIPTION NO. 425µ Pc CC Test UCT C Φ
Ratio C Φ C Φ Content Content Sulphate Content Value
m % % % % % % % % % kPa MPa MPa kPa deg. kPa kPa deg. kPa deg. % % % mg/L

5DBH-112 10.657 -1.1 S 3 3.45 3 P1/D1 1.50-1.95 21 44 25 19 10 43 16 31 0.12 <0.01 <0.01 6.6
S 4.5 4.95 3 UD1 3.50-4.50 20 36 22 14 14 50 10 26 0.640 90 0.350 69 10
S 6 6.45 5 P4/D4 6.00-6.45 20 39 24 15 0 65 10 25
S 7.5 7.95 26 P6/D6 9.00-9.45 18 NP NP NP 11 57 32
S 9 9.45 11 P11/D11 16.50-16.95 26 47 26 21 9 16 26 49
S 10.5 10.95 17
S 12 12.3 50/150
S 13.5 13.72 50/90
S 15 15.31 50/160
S 16.5 16.95 35
S 18 18.305 50/155
S 19.5 19.61 50/90
S 21 21.1 50/60
S 22.5 22.62 50/70
S 24 24.12 50/75
S 25.5 25.8 50/150
S 27 27.16 50/85
S 28.5 28.67 50/90
S 30 30.3 50/150
S 31.5 31.6 50/65
S 33 33.1 50/75
S 34.5 34.61 50/70
S 36 36.07 50/50
LOG 0 1.5 SN/WOOD
LOG 1.5 3 CL/SN
LOG 3 3.5 CL/WOOD
LOG 3.5 6 CL/SN
LOG 6 9 SN/GR
LOG 9 10.5 SN/SI/GR
LOG 10.5 12 SN
LOG 12 16.5 SN/GR
LOG 16.5 18 SI/CL
LOG 18 19.5 SI/GR
LOG 19.5 21 SI/SN/GR
LOG 21 22.5 SI/SN
LOG 22.5 25.5 SI/GR
LOG 25.5 27 SI/SN
LOG 27 30 SN/GR
LOG 30 33 SI/CL
LOG 33 34.5 SN/GR
LOG 34.5 36 SI/SN
LOG 36 36.07 SI/SN/GR

5DBH-113 10.301 -1.1 S 1.5 1.95 3 P1/D1 1.50-1.95 29 47 26 21 2 33 25 40 0.15 <0.01 <0.01 6.5
S 3 3.45 5 UD1 3.50-4.50 28 46 25 21 0 37 24 39 0.790 63 0.420 61 7
S 4.5 4.95 6 P3/D3 4.50-4.95 17 NP NP NP 3 89 8
S 6 6.45 5 P5/D5 7.50-7.95 22 44 24 20 1 42 21 36
S 7.5 7.95 8 P7/D7 10.50-10.95 26 46 25 21 5 22 29 44
S 9 9.45 11 P12/D12 18.00-18.375 25 45 31 14 7 22 43 28
S 10.5 10.95 12
S 12 12.45 38
S 13.5 13.8 50/150
S 15 15.16 50/90
S 16.5 16.81 50/160
S 18 18.375 50/225
S 19.5 19.78 50/130
S 21 21.11 50/40
S 22.5 22.67 50/70
S 24 24.09 50/60
S 25.5 25.59 50/65
S 27 27.11 50/75
S 28.5 28.58 50/60
S 30 30.17 50/100
S 31.5 31.61 50/70
LOG 0 1.5 SN
LOG 1.5 3 CL/SI
LOG 3 3.5 CL/SN
LOG 3.5 4.5 CL/SI
LOG 4.5 7.5 SN
LOG 7.5 10.5 CL/SI
LOG 10.5 12 SN/SI
LOG 12 13.5 CL/SI
LOG 13.5 18 SN/GR
LOG 18 22.5 SI/CL
LOG 22.5 24 SI/GR
LOG 24 25.5 SI/SN
LOG 25.5 27 SI/SN/GR
LOG 27 28.5 SI/GR
LOG 28.5 30 SI/SN
LOG 30 31.61 SI/CL
 ATTERBERG LIMITS PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION Point Rock UU Triaxial
1-D Consolidation CIU Triaxial Chemical Tests
Compression Soil
WATER STARTING ENDING SOIL SAMPLE DEPTH M/C Passing Load Test
BH NO. BH EGL REMARK SPT'N RQD CRR SG LL PL PI GRAVEL SAND SILT CLAY Void UCT Total Effective Organic Chloride Total Sulphate pH
LEVEL DEPTH DEPTH DESCRIPTION NO. 425µ Pc CC Test UCT C Φ
Ratio C Φ C Φ Content Content Sulphate Content Value
m % % % % % % % % % kPa MPa MPa kPa deg. kPa kPa deg. kPa deg. % % % mg/L

5DBH-115 13.557 -2.16 S 1.5 1.95 3 P1/D1 1.50-1.95 29 51 32 19 1 61 27 11 4.35 <0.01 <0.01 4.1
S 3 3.45 5 UD1 3.50-4.50 21 NP NP NP 1 72 27
S 4.5 4.95 7 P3/D3 4.50-4.95 21 NP NP NP 2 83 15
S 6 6.45 6 P5/D5 7.50-7.95 30 42 30 12 7 58 26 9
S 7.5 7.95 7 P7/D7 10.50-10.95 24 39 27 12 1 57 26 16
S 9 9.45 8
S 10.5 10.95 12
S 12 12.45 11
S 13.5 13.87 50/220
S 15 15.32 50/170
S 16.5 16.8 50/150
S 18 18.45 50/300
S 19.5 19.8 50/150
S 21 21.285 50/135
S 22.5 22.84 50/190
S 24 24.170 50/70
S 25.5 25.69 50/100
S 27 27.15 50/90
S 28.5 28.65 50/80
S 30 30.13 50/70
S 31.5 31.59 50/60
LOG 0 1.5 SI/GR
LOG 1.5 4.5 CL/SN
LOG 4.5 7.5 SN
LOG 7.5 10.5 CL/SN
LOG 10.5 13.5 SN/SI
LOG 13.5 15 SI/CL/SN
LOG 15 16.5 SN/GR
LOG 16.5 18 SN
LOG 18 21 SI/CL
LOG 21 24 SN/GR
LOG 24 25.5 SN
LOG 25.5 27 SI/GR
LOG 27 28.5 SI/CL/GR
LOG 28.5 30 SI/SN
LOG 30 31.5 SI/SN/GR
LOG 31.5 31.59 SI/SN

5DBH-116 14.340 -2.15 S 1.5 1.95 3 P1/D1 1.50-1.95 26 48 31 17 2 57 29 12 5.44 <0.01 <0.01 4.9
S 3 3.45 4 UD1 3.50-4.50 22 43 28 15 0 65 22 13 0.614 22 0.296 26 23
S 4.5 4.95 5 P5/D5 7.50-7.95 32 45 29 16 2 27 45 26
S 6 6.45 6 P6/D6 9.00-9.45 26 39 28 11 7 47 34 12
S 7.5 7.95 12 P9/D9 13.50-13.95 22 39 28 11 3 61 26 10
S 9 9.45 15
S 10.5 10.95 9
S 12 12.45 11
S 13.5 13.95 33
S 15 15.25 50/130
S 16.5 16.825 50/175
S 18 18.305 50/155
S 19.5 19.76 50/150
S 21 21.23 50/110
S 22.5 22.65 50/80
S 24 24.22 50/135
S 25.5 25.61 50/85
S 27 27.14 50/70
S 28.5 28.64 50/85
S 30 30.09 50/70
S 31.5 31.55 50/40
S 33 33.85 50/60
LOG 0 1.5 DECAYED WOOD
LOG 1.5 7.5 CL/SN
LOG 7.5 9 CL/SI/GR
LOG 9 10.5 CL/GR
LOG 10.5 13.5 CL/SI
LOG 13.5 16.5 SN
LOG 16.5 18 SI/CL
LOG 18 19.5 SI/GR
LOG 19.5 21 SI/SN
LOG 21 24 SN
LOG 24 27 SN/GR
LOG 27 28.5 SI/GR
LOG 28.5 30 SN/CL/GR
LOG 30 33.85 SN/GR
 ATTERBERG LIMITS PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION Point Rock UU Triaxial
1-D Consolidation CIU Triaxial Chemical Tests
Compression Soil
WATER STARTING ENDING SOIL SAMPLE DEPTH M/C Passing Load Test
BH NO. BH EGL REMARK SPT'N RQD CRR SG LL PL PI GRAVEL SAND SILT CLAY Void UCT Total Effective Organic Chloride Total Sulphate pH
LEVEL DEPTH DEPTH DESCRIPTION NO. 425µ Pc CC Test UCT C Φ
Ratio C Φ C Φ Content Content Sulphate Content Value
m % % % % % % % % % kPa MPa MPa kPa deg. kPa kPa deg. kPa deg. % % % mg/L

5DBH-117 22.273 -1.1 S 1.5 1.95 3 P1/D1 1.50-1.95 26 45 30 15 3 31 41 25 0.14 <0.01 <0.01 6.5
S 3 3.45 7 P2/D2 3.00-3.45 24 41 23 18 1 52 16 31
S 4.5 4.95 9 P4/D4 6.00-6.45 17 NP NP NP 26 41 33
S 6 6.45 14 P6/D6 9.00-9.45 22 37 29 8 14 44 29 13
S 7.5 7.95 13 P11/D11 16.50-16.83 25 47 25 22 0 25 30 45
S 9 9.45 9
S 10.5 10.95 15
S 12 12.45 11
S 13.5 13.95 15
S 15 15.45 50/300
S 16.5 16.83 50/80
S 18 18.27 50/150
S 19.5 19.65 50/85
S 21 21.11 50/60
S 22.5 22.57 50/50
S 24 24.17 50/70
LOG 0 1.5 SN
LOG 1.5 3 CL/SN
LOG 3 4.5 SN/SI
LOG 4.5 6 SN
LOG 6 7.5 SN/GR
LOG 7.5 9 SN
LOG 9 12 SN/CL/GR
LOG 12 15 SN/CL
LOG 15 16.5 SI/CL/GR
LOG 16.5 19.5 SI/CL
LOG 19.5 21 SI/GR
LOG 21 22.5 NO RECOVERY
LOG 22.5 24 SI/GR
LOG 24 24.17 SI/CL

5DBH-118 16.348 -5.66 S 1.5 1.95 3 P1/D1 1.50-1.95 24 44 24 20 18 35 16 31 0.13 <0.01 <0.01 6.6
S 3 3.45 5 P3/D2 4.50-4.95 25 49 26 23 3 32 25 40
S 4.5 4.95 4 U3-1 8.00-9.00 20 40 23 17 11 42 16 31 0.618 75 0.409 67 10
S 6 6.45 6 P7/D7 10.50-10.95 24 NP NP NP 16 54 30
S 7.5 7.95 3 P11/D10 16.50-16.95 25 48 25 23 0 18 33 49
S 9 9.45 4
S 10.5 10.95 7
S 12 12.45 13
S 13.5 13.95 12
S 15 15.45 17
S 16.5 16.95 29
S 18 18.33 50/180
S 19.5 19.76 50/110
S 21 21.24 50/115
S 22.5 22.685 50/100
S 24 24.18 50/105
S 25.5 25.62 50/70
S 27 27.22 50/135
LOG 0 1.5 SN
LOG 1.5 3 CL/SN/GR
LOG 3 4.5 NO RECOVERY
LOG 4.5 9 CL/SN
LOG 9 10.5 CL/SN/GR
LOG 10.5 13.5 CL/SN
LOG 13.5 16.5 SN/GR
LOG 16.5 18 CL/SI
LOG 18 25.5 SI/CL
LOG 25.5 27 SI/SN
LOG 27 27.22 SI/CL
 ATTERBERG LIMITS PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION Point Rock UU Triaxial
1-D Consolidation CIU Triaxial Chemical Tests
Compression Soil
WATER STARTING ENDING SOIL SAMPLE DEPTH M/C Passing Load Test
BH NO. BH EGL REMARK SPT'N RQD CRR SG LL PL PI GRAVEL SAND SILT CLAY Void UCT Total Effective Organic Chloride Total Sulphate pH
LEVEL DEPTH DEPTH DESCRIPTION NO. 425µ Pc CC Test UCT C Φ
Ratio C Φ C Φ Content Content Sulphate Content Value
m % % % % % % % % % kPa MPa MPa kPa deg. kPa kPa deg. kPa deg. % % % mg/L

5DBH-119 15.097 -5.16 S 1.5 1.95 2 P1/D1 1.50-1.95 25 42 23 19 11 34 20 35 0.13 <0.01 <0.01 6.6
S 3 3.45 5 UD-1 3.50-4.50 19 34 21 13 1 61 11 27 0.598 84 0.367
S 4.5 4.95 10 P5/D5 7.50-7.95 23 48 25 23 1 24 30 45
S 6 6.45 13 P7/D7 10.50-10.85 15 NP NP NP 2 64 34
S 7.5 7.95 7 P11/D11 16.50-16.80 22 46 25 21 5 32 24 39
S 9 9.45 9
S 10.5 10.85 50/200
S 12 12.32 50/170
S 13.5 13.8 50/150
S 15 15.11 50/40
S 16.5 16.8 50/150
S 18 18.31 50/160
S 19.5 19.78 50/150
LOG 0 1.5 DECAYED WOOD
LOG 1.5 4.5 CL/SN
LOG 4.5 7.5 SN
LOG 7.5 9 CL/SI
LOG 9 10.5 CL/SN
LOG 10.5 13.5 SN
LOG 13.5 15 SN/GR
LOG 15 16.5 NO RECOVERY
LOG 16.5 18 SI/SN
LOG 18 19.78 SI/CL

5DBH-120 28.263 -2.7 S 1.5 1.95 4 P1/D2 1.50-1.95 27 49 31 18 14 47 28 11

S 3 3.45 3 U3 1 2.00-3.00 29 14 21 4 29
S 4.5 4.95 6 P2/D3 3.00-3.45 26 46 29 17 13 45 27 15
S 6 6.45 5 P3/D4 4.50-4.95 6 32 26 6 11 39 38 12
S 7.5 7.95 8 P4/D5 6.00-6.45 28 44 29 15 8 54 25 13
S 9 9.45 12 P6/D7 9.00-9.45 26 45 29 16 2 35 40 23
S 10.5 10.95 43
S 12 12.45 31
S 13.5 13.95 27
S 15 15.45 33
S 16.5 16.95 35
S 18 18.45 32
S 19.5 19.95 34
S 21 21.45 36
S 22.5 22.95 40
S 24 24.365 50/215
S 25.5 25.795 50/145
S 27 27.18 50/45
S 28.5 28.65 50/40
S 30 30.11 50/40
S 31.5 31.6 50/30
S 33 33.11 50/40
S 34.5 34.59 50/30
S 36 36.09 50/30
S 37.5 37.605 50/35
S 39 39.1 50/35
S 40.5 40.59 50/30
S 42 42.105 50/40
LOG 0 1.5 CL/SN
LOG 1.5 4.5 SN/SI
LOG 4.5 6 SN/SI/GR
LOG 6 9 SN/SI
LOG 9 10.5 SN/CL
LOG 10.5 12 SN/SI
LOG 12 13.5 SI/SN/GR
LOG 13.5 18 SI/SN
LOG 18 19.5 SN/CL/GR
LOG 19.5 21 SI/SN
LOG 21 24 SN/CL
LOG 24 27 SI/SN
LOG 27 28.5 SN/CL/GR
LOG 28.5 31.5 SI/SN/GR
LOG 31.5 33 SN/CL
LOG 33 37.5 SI/SN/GR
LOG 37.5 39 SN/CL
LOG 39 42.105 SI/SN
 ATTERBERG LIMITS PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION Point Rock UU Triaxial
1-D Consolidation CIU Triaxial Chemical Tests
Compression Soil
WATER STARTING ENDING SOIL SAMPLE DEPTH M/C Passing Load Test
BH NO. BH EGL REMARK SPT'N RQD CRR SG LL PL PI GRAVEL SAND SILT CLAY Void UCT Total Effective Organic Chloride Total Sulphate pH
LEVEL DEPTH DEPTH DESCRIPTION NO. 425µ Pc CC Test UCT C Φ
Ratio C Φ C Φ Content Content Sulphate Content Value
m % % % % % % % % % kPa MPa MPa kPa deg. kPa kPa deg. kPa deg. % % % mg/L

5DBH-121 28.069 -2.4 S 1.5 1.95 10 P1/D1 1.50-1.95 31 52 30 22 1 29 43 27

S 3 3.45 18 P2/D2 3.00-3.45 41 59 33 26 0 7 60 33
S 4.5 4.95 14 P3/D3 4.50-4.95 41 55 32 23 5 59 24 12
S 6 6.45 11 P4/D4 6.00-6.45 27 49 31 18 13 48 28 11
S 7.5 7.95 17 P5/D5 9.00-9.45 22 43 29 14 25 33 28 14
S 9 9.45 41
S 10.5 10.95 33
S 12 12.45 42
S 13.5 13.95 50/240
S 15 15.34 50/195
S 16.5 16.815 50/165
S 18 18.375 50/225
S 19.5 19.945 50/295
S 21 21.425 50/275
S 22.5 22.935 50/285
S 24 24.45 50/300
S 25.5 25.65 50/55
S 27 27.235 50/110
S 28.5 28.765 50/115
S 30 30.24 50/105
S 31.5 31.755 50/140
LOG 0 1.5 SI/SN
LOG 1.5 6 SI/SN/GR
LOG 6 7.5 CL/SI
LOG 7.5 9 CL/SN
LOG 9 12 SI/SN
LOG 12 13.5 SI/CL/GR
LOG 13.5 19.5 SI/CL
LOG 19.5 25.5 SI/SN
LOG 25.5 27 SI/SN/GR
LOG 27 28.5 CL
LOG 28.5 30 CL/SI
LOG 30 31.755 SI/SN

RB30-1 27.714 -1.1 S 1.5 1.95 7 P6/D6 9.00-9.45 22 43 31 12 22 24 35 19

S 3 3.45 20 P11/D11 16.50-16.95 41 61 29 32 0 5 38 57
S 4.5 4.95 11 P20/D20 30.00-30.28 19 NP NP NP 15 69 16
S 6 6.45 10
S 7.5 7.95 18
S 9 9.45 16
S 10.5 10.95 50/300
S 12 12.45 31
S 13.5 13.95 45
S 15 15.45 32
S 16.5 16.95 41
S 18 18.36 50/210
S 19.5 19.95 50/300
S 21 21.45 31
S 22.5 22.95 34
S 24 24.375 50/225
S 25.5 25.615 50/65
S 27 27.145 50/85
S 28.5 28.64 50/80
S 30 30.28 50/140
S 31.5 31.735 50/85
S 33 33.15 50/75
S 34.5 34.71 50/90
S 36 36.25 50/120
S 37.5 37.77 50/150
S 39 39.2 50/125
S 40.5 40.79 50/140
S 42 42.31 50/160
LOG 0 4.5 CL
LOG 4.5 9 CL/SN
LOG 9 10.5 CL
LOG 10.5 12 CL/SN/GR
LOG 12 22.5 CL/SI
LOG 22.5 24 SI/SN
LOG 24 25.5 SN/SI
LOG 25.5 27 SN/SI/GR
LOG 27 28.5 GR/SN
LOG 28.5 30 SN/SI
LOG 30 33 SN/SI/GR
LOG 33 42 SN/SI
LOG 42 42.31 SI/SN
 ATTERBERG LIMITS PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION Point Rock UU Triaxial
1-D Consolidation CIU Triaxial Chemical Tests
Compression Soil
WATER STARTING ENDING SOIL SAMPLE DEPTH M/C Passing Load Test
BH NO. BH EGL REMARK SPT'N RQD CRR SG LL PL PI GRAVEL SAND SILT CLAY Void UCT Total Effective Organic Chloride Total Sulphate pH
LEVEL DEPTH DEPTH DESCRIPTION NO. 425µ Pc CC Test UCT C Φ
Ratio C Φ C Φ Content Content Sulphate Content Value
m % % % % % % % % % kPa MPa MPa kPa deg. kPa kPa deg. kPa deg. % % % mg/L

RB30-2 23.326 -2.3 S 1.5 1.95 5 P4/D5 6.00-6.45 20 NP NP NP 12 69 19

S 3 3.45 16 P21/D18 31.50-31.70 17 NP NP NP 2 66 32
S 4.5 4.95 35
S 6 6.45 28
S 7.5 7.95 32
S 9 9.45 35
S 10.5 10.95 43
S 12 12.45 38
S 13.5 13.95 25
S 15 15.36 50/60
S 16.5 16.95 41
S 18 18.105 50/35
C 18.3 19.3 0 30
S 19.3 19.75 33
S 21 21.45 31
S 22.5 22.865 50/215
S 24 24.34 50/190
S 25.5 25.61 50/40
S 27 27.105 50/35
S 28.5 28.615 50/45
S 30 30.095 50/30
S 31.5 31.72 50/70
S 33 33.14 50/45
S 34.5 34.68 50/60
S 36 36.29 50/140
S 37.5 37.765 50/120
S 39 39.11 50/40
S 40.5 40.605 50/35
LOG 0 1.5 SI/SN
LOG 1.5 2 SI/SN/GR
LOG 2 3 NO RECOVERY
LOG 3 4.5 SN/GR
LOG 4.5 6 GR/SN
LOG 6 9 SN/SI/GR
LOG 9 10.5 SN/SI
LOG 10.5 12 SI/SN/GR
LOG 12 13.5 SN/CL
LOG 13.5 15 SN/CL/GR
LOG 15 16.5 SN/GR
LOG 16.5 18 SN/CL
LOG 18 18.3 SN/GR
LOG 18.3 19.3 SS
LOG 19.3 22.5 NO RECOVERY
LOG 22.5 30 SN/CL/GR
LOG 30 39 SN/CL
LOG 39 40.5 SN/GR
LOG 40.5 40.605 SN/CL/GR

5DBH-122 15.122 0 S 1.5 1.95 1 P1/D2 1.50-1.95 22 42 23 19 2 54 14 30 0.21 <0.01 <0.01 6.6
S 4.5 4.95 2 U3-1 3.00-4.00 28 48 25 23 4 42 19 35 0.839 62 0.440 53 8
S 6 6.45 3 P4/D5 7.50-7.95 20 NP NP NP 21 51 28
S 7.5 7.95 21 P6/D7 10.50-10.95 21 44 23 21 14 49 11 26
S 9 9.45 19 P8/D9 13.50-13.95 24 46 24 22 9 37 19 35
S 10.5 10.95 18
S 12 12.45 27
S 13.5 13.95 29
S 15 15.45 37
S 16.5 16.95 43
S 18 18.149 50/79
S 19.5 19.775 50/125
S 21 21.395 50/245
S 22.5 22.775 50/165
S 24 24.27 50/130
S 25.5 25.85 50/195
S 27 27.165 50/85
LOG 0 1.5 SI/SN/ROOTS
LOG 1.5 3 CL/SN
LOG 3 12 CL/SN/GR
LOG 12 13.5 SI/CL
LOG 13.5 18 SI/CL/GR
LOG 18 24.165 SI/SN/GR
 ATTERBERG LIMITS PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION Point Rock UU Triaxial
1-D Consolidation CIU Triaxial Chemical Tests
Compression Soil
WATER STARTING ENDING SOIL SAMPLE DEPTH M/C Passing Load Test
BH NO. BH EGL REMARK SPT'N RQD CRR SG LL PL PI GRAVEL SAND SILT CLAY Void UCT Total Effective Organic Chloride Total Sulphate pH
LEVEL DEPTH DEPTH DESCRIPTION NO. 425µ Pc CC Test UCT C Φ
Ratio C Φ C Φ Content Content Sulphate Content Value
m % % % % % % % % % kPa MPa MPa kPa deg. kPa kPa deg. kPa deg. % % % mg/L

5DBH-123 14.894 0 S 1.5 1.95 1 P2/D2 3.00-3.45 26 50 31 19 1 33 44 22 8.28 <0.01 <0.01 4.8
S 3 3.45 3 U3-1 3.50-4.50 36 IS IS IS 2 62 23 13 IS IS IS
S 4.5 4.95 2 P4/D3 6.00-6.45 21 45 29 16 1 64 24 11
S 6 6.45 16 P5/D4 7.50-7.95 42 57 32 25 1 39 36 24
S 7.5 7.95 28 P8/D7 12.00-12.45 34 52 31 21 1 22 50 27
S 9 9.45 30
S 10.5 10.95 22
S 12 12.45 13
S 13.5 13.95 22
S 15 15.379 50/229
S 16.5 16.845 50/195
S 18 18.26 50/145
S 19.5 19.81 50/170
S 21 21.26 50/150
S 22.5 22.845 50/195
S 24 24.3 50/160
LOG 0 1.5 CL/SN/GR
LOG 1.5 3 NO RECOVERY
LOG 3 4.5 CL/SN
LOG 4.5 6 NO RECOVERY
LOG 6 7.5 SI/SN
LOG 7.5 10.5 SN/SI
LOG 10.5 12 CL/SN/GR
LOG 12 13.5 CL/SN
LOG 13.5 16.5 CL/SN/GR
LOG 16.5 18 SI/CL
LOG 18 19.5 SI/SN/GR
LOG 19.5 21 SI/SN
LOG 21 22.5 SI/SN/GR
LOG 22.5 24 SI/SN
LOG 24 24.3 SI/SN/GR

5DBH-124 7.840 -1 S 1.5 1.95 2 P1/D2 1.50-1.95 27 48 31 17 11 47 31 11 4.32 <0.01 <0.01 4.6
S 3 3.45 3 U3-1 3.50-4.50 28 50 32 18 17 36 35 12 0.778 21 0.262 23 24
S 4.5 4.95 5 P4/D5 6.00-6.45 32 53 31 22 1 48 33 18
S 6 6.45 9 P7/D8 10.50-10.95 21 44 30 14 12 52 26 10
S 7.5 7.95 15 P9/D10 13.50-13.95 22 43 29 14 2 53 31 14
S 9 9.45 19
S 10.5 10.95 27
S 12 12.45 31
S 13.5 13.95 22
S 15 15.145 50/70
S 16.5 16.69 50/100
S 18 18.23 50/110
S 19.5 19.705 50/105
S 21 21.24 50/130
S 22.5 22.755 50/125
S 24 24.205 50/110
LOG 0 1.5 CL/SN
LOG 1.5 3 CL/SN/GR
LOG 3 3.5 CL/SN
LOG 3.5 4.5 CL/SN/GR
LOG 4.5 7.5 CL/SN
LOG 7.5 13.5 CL/SN/GR
LOG 13.5 15 SI/SN/GR
LOG 15 16.5 CL/SN/GR
LOG 16.5 18 SN/CL/GR
LOG 18 21 SI/SN/GR
LOG 21 22.5 SI/SN
LOG 22.5 24.205 SI/SN/GR
 ATTERBERG LIMITS PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION Point Rock UU Triaxial
1-D Consolidation CIU Triaxial Chemical Tests
Compression Soil
WATER STARTING ENDING SOIL SAMPLE DEPTH M/C Passing Load Test
BH NO. BH EGL REMARK SPT'N RQD CRR SG LL PL PI GRAVEL SAND SILT CLAY Void UCT Total Effective Organic Chloride Total Sulphate pH
LEVEL DEPTH DEPTH DESCRIPTION NO. 425µ Pc CC Test UCT C Φ
Ratio C Φ C Φ Content Content Sulphate Content Value
m % % % % % % % % % kPa MPa MPa kPa deg. kPa kPa deg. kPa deg. % % % mg/L

5GTBH-01 17.911 0 S 1.5 1.95 4 D1 0.00-0.30 57 69 32 37 0 1 42 57 0.82 <0.01 <0.01 5.8

S 3 3.45 6 P1/D2 1.50-1.95 20 NP NP NP 33 37 30
S 4.5 4.95 5 U3-1 3.50-4.50 21 41 22 19 9 51 12 28 0.639 80 0.394 75
S 6 6.45 6 P4/D5 6.00-6.45 23 43 24 19 3 38 22 37
S 7.5 7.95 9 P6/D7 9.00-9.45 37 60 28 32 0 5 55 40
S 9 9.45 7
S 10.5 10.95 25
S 12 12.45 17
S 13.5 13.95 9
S 15 15.45 11
S 16.5 16.95 10
S 18 18.45 30
S 19.5 19.45 50/300
S 21 21.445 50/295
S 22.5 22.935 50/185
S 24 24.26 50/110
LOG 0 1.5 SI/SN/WOOD
LOG 1.5 9 CL/SN/GR
LOG 9 10.5 CL/SI
LOG 10.5 12 CL/SI/WOOD
LOG 12 13.5 SN/SI
LOG 13.5 19.5 CL/SN/GR
LOG 19.5 21 SI/SN
LOG 21 24.26 SI/SN/GR

5DBH-125 31.072 -0.2 S 1.5 1.95 4 U3-1 3.00-4.00 20 43 31 12 5 41 35 19 0.624 64 0.277 40 8 0.12 <0.01 <0.01 6.7
S 4.5 4.95 16 P2/D3 4.50-4.95 23 45 30 15 4 31 40 25
S 6 6.45 17 P4/D5 7.50-7.95 22 37 28 9 12 47 28 13
S 7.5 7.95 9 U3-3 9.00-10.00 32 48 32 16 9 17 45 29 61 5 20 24 10 32
S 10.5 10.95 7 P7/D8 13.50-13.95 14 35 29 6 5 60 25 10
S 12 12.45 9
S 13.5 13.95 8
S 15 15.45 10
S 16.5 16.95 18
S 18 18.45 18
S 19.5 19.95 16
S 21 21.45 19
S 22.5 22.95 16
S 24 24.45 38
S 25.5 25.95 24
S 27 27.45 28
S 28.5 28.95 31
S 30 30.45 34
S 31.5 31.95 25
S 33 33.45 34
S 34.5 34.95 50/300
S 36 36.375 50/225
S 37.5 37.74 50/115
S 39 39.3 50/150
S 40.5 40.875 50/225
S 42 42.22 50/120
S 43.5 43.69 50/100
S 45 45.16 50/85
S 46.5 46.69 50/80
S 48 48.135 50/60
S 49.5 49.8 50/150
S 51 51.12 50/70
LOG 0 4.5 SI/SN
LOG 4.5 7.5 SI/CL
LOG 7.5 9 SI/SN
LOG 9 10.5 SI/CL
LOG 10.5 12 CL/SI/GR
LOG 12 13.5 CL/SN
LOG 13.5 16.5 SI/SN
LOG 16.5 19.5 CL/SI
LOG 19.5 21 SI/CL
LOG 21 24 SI/SN
LOG 24 25.5 SN/SI
LOG 25.5 34.5 SI/SN
LOG 34.5 36 SI/SN/GR
LOG 36 37.5 SI
LOG 37.5 39 SI/SN
LOG 39 40.5 SN/SI/GR
LOG 40.5 48 SI/SN
LOG 48 49.5 SN/SI/GR
LOG 49.5 51 SI/SN
LOG 51 51.12 SN/SI/GR
 ATTERBERG LIMITS PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION Point Rock UU Triaxial
1-D Consolidation CIU Triaxial Chemical Tests
Compression Soil
WATER STARTING ENDING SOIL SAMPLE DEPTH M/C Passing Load Test
BH NO. BH EGL REMARK SPT'N RQD CRR SG LL PL PI GRAVEL SAND SILT CLAY Void UCT Total Effective Organic Chloride Total Sulphate pH
LEVEL DEPTH DEPTH DESCRIPTION NO. 425µ Pc CC Test UCT C Φ
Ratio C Φ C Φ Content Content Sulphate Content Value
m % % % % % % % % % kPa MPa MPa kPa deg. kPa kPa deg. kPa deg. % % % mg/L

5DBH-126 28.211 -1.1 S 1.5 1.95 1 U3/1 2.00-3.00 29 48 31 17 0 29 43 28 0.843 60 0.244 65 6 0.1 <0.01 <0.01 6.6
S 3 3.45 5 U3/2 5.00-6.00 24 46 30 16 0 32 45 23 0.702 69 0.223 74 6
S 4.5 4.95 5 P5/D5 7.50-7.95 19 NP NP NP 18 54 28
S 6 6.45 12 P9/D9 13.50-13.95 20 38 29 9 0 52 32 16
S 7.5 7.95 10 P14/D14 21.00-21.45 20 53 33 20 0 7 54 39
S 9 9.45 7
S 10.5 10.95 22
S 12 12.45 15
S 13.5 13.95 18
S 15 15.45 21
S 16.5 16.95 18
S 18 18.45 17
S 19.5 19.95 16
S 21 21.45 24
S 22.5 22.95 26
S 24 24.45 22
S 25.5 25.95 24
S 27 27.45 27
S 28.5 28.84 50/190
S 30 30.41 50/260
S 31.5 31.85 50/200
S 33 33.33 50/180
S 34.5 34.75 50/135
S 36 36.305 50/180
S 37.5 37.725 50/120
S 39 39.24 50/135
S 40.5 40.675 50/100
S 42 42.195 50/105
S 43.5 43.65 50/75
S 45 45.11 50/50
S 46.5 46.6 50/50
LOG 0 1.5 SI/SN
LOG 1.5 2 NO RECOVERY
LOG 2 3 CL/SN/GR
LOG 3 4.5 CL/SN
LOG 4.5 5 CL/SI
LOG 5 7.5 SI/SN
LOG 7.5 9 SN/SI
LOG 9 10.5 SI/SN
LOG 10.5 12 SI/GR
LOG 12 13.5 SI/CL
LOG 13.5 18 SI/SN
LOG 18 19.5 SI/SN/GR
LOG 19.5 21 SI/SN
LOG 21 22.5 SI/CL
LOG 22.5 28.5 SI/SN
LOG 28.5 31.5 SI/SN/GR
LOG 31.5 46.6 SI/SN
 ATTERBERG LIMITS PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION Point Rock UU Triaxial
1-D Consolidation CIU Triaxial Chemical Tests
Compression Soil
WATER STARTING ENDING SOIL SAMPLE DEPTH M/C Passing Load Test
BH NO. BH EGL REMARK SPT'N RQD CRR SG LL PL PI GRAVEL SAND SILT CLAY Void UCT Total Effective Organic Chloride Total Sulphate pH
LEVEL DEPTH DEPTH DESCRIPTION NO. 425µ Pc CC Test UCT C Φ
Ratio C Φ C Φ Content Content Sulphate Content Value
m % % % % % % % % % kPa MPa MPa kPa deg. kPa kPa deg. kPa deg. % % % mg/L

RB31-1 24.698 -0.9 S 1.5 1.95 6 UD1 3.50-4.50 21 38 29 9 3 50 31 16 0.617 65 0.255

S 3 3.45 8 UD2 6.50-7.50 26 47 29 18 1 37 39 23 43 7
S 4.5 4.95 9 P11/D11 16.50-16.95 23 40 28 12 4 49 31 16
S 6 6.45 7 P26/D26 39.00-39.14 20 35 27 8 2 61 27 10
S 7.5 7.95 5
S 9 9.45 8
S 10.5 10.95 14
S 12 12.45 11
S 13.5 13.95 10
S 15 15.45 15
S 16.5 16.95 12
S 18 18.45 20
S 19.5 19.95 22
S 21 21.45 23
S 22.5 22.95 21
S 24 24.45 42
S 25.5 25.95 32
S 27 27.415 50/265
S 28.5 28.95 37
S 30 30.29 50/140
S 31.5 31.86 50/210
S 33 33.26 50/135
S 34.5 34.85 50/200
S 36 36.36 50/210
S 37.5 37.755 50/130
S 39 39.135 50/70
S 40.5 40.61 50/60
S 42 42.26 50/135
S 43.5 43.83 50/200
S 45 45.1 50/55
S 46.5 46.78 50/130
S 48 48.185 50/60
LOG 0 18 SI/SN
LOG 18 19.5 SI/SN/GR
LOG 19.5 22.5 SI/SN
LOG 22.5 24 SN/SI
LOG 24 30 SI/SN
LOG 30 31.5 SN/SI
LOG 31.5 33 SI/SN
LOG 33 34.5 SN/SI
LOG 34.5 40.5 SI/SN
LOG 40.5 48 SN/SI
LOG 48 48.185 SI/SN
 ATTERBERG LIMITS PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION Point Rock UU Triaxial
1-D Consolidation CIU Triaxial Chemical Tests
Compression Soil
WATER STARTING ENDING SOIL SAMPLE DEPTH M/C Passing Load Test
BH NO. BH EGL REMARK SPT'N RQD CRR SG LL PL PI GRAVEL SAND SILT CLAY Void UCT Total Effective Organic Chloride Total Sulphate pH
LEVEL DEPTH DEPTH DESCRIPTION NO. 425µ Pc CC Test UCT C Φ
Ratio C Φ C Φ Content Content Sulphate Content Value
m % % % % % % % % % kPa MPa MPa kPa deg. kPa kPa deg. kPa deg. % % % mg/L

RB31-2 29.763 -0.5 S 1.5 1.95 3 UD1 3.00-4.00 30 47 29 18 5 27 42 26 0.887 60 0.290

S 4.5 4.95 7 UD2 6.00-7.00 22 71 10
S 7.5 7.95 8 P10/D11 18.00-18.45 28 54 32 22 0 4 56 40
S 9 9.45 6 P27/D28 45.00-45.14 13 NP NP NP 17 58 25
S 10.5 10.95 9
S 12 12.45 17
S 13.5 13.95 18
S 15 15.45 29
S 16.5 16.95 23
S 18 18.45 21
S 19.5 19.95 23
S 21 21.45 19
S 22.5 22.95 26
S 24 24.45 28
S 25.5 25.95 21
S 27 27.45 26
S 28.5 28.95 28
S 30 30.45 35
S 31.5 31.95 38
S 33 33.375 50/225
S 34.5 34.73 50/125
S 36 36.2 50/105
S 37.5 37.8 50/150
S 39 39.2 50/100
S 40.5 40.675 50/75
S 42 42.135 50/60
S 43.5 43.725 50/75
S 45 45.135 50/75
S 46.5 46.64 50/65
S 48 48.08 50/30
S 49.5 49.75 50/125
LOG 0 1.5 SI/SN
LOG 1.5 4.5 CL/SN/GR
LOG 4.5 7.5 CL/SN
LOG 7.5 9 CL/SI/SN
LOG 9 10.5 CL/SN
LOG 10.5 13.5 SI/CL
LOG 13.5 15 CL/SI/SN
LOG 15 16.5 SI/CL
LOG 16.5 25.5 SI/SN
LOG 25.5 27 SI/CL
LOG 27 28.5 CL/SN
LOG 28.5 30 SI/CL
LOG 30 31.5 SI/SN
LOG 31.5 33 SI
LOG 33 34.5 SI/SN
LOG 34.5 36 SN/SI/GR
LOG 36 37.5 SI/SN/GR
LOG 37.5 39 SI/GR
LOG 39 43.5 SI/SN
LOG 43.5 45 SN/SI
LOG 45 46.5 SI/SN/GR
LOG 46.5 48 SI/SN
LOG 48 49.5 NO RECOVERY
LOG 49.5 49.75 SI/SN

5GTBH-02 25.594 -2 S 1.5 1.95 3 P1/D1 1.50-1.95 27 50 30 20 1 62 23 14 3.96 <0.01 <0.01 4.3
S 3 3.45 2 U3-1 3.50-4.50 25 40 28 12 1 61 26 12 0.713 20 0.285 23 20
S 4.5 4.95 1 P4/D4 6.00-6.45 27 44 28 16 5 56 24 15
S 6 6.45 2 P6/D6 9.00-9.45 22 40 27 13 13 49 24 14
S 7.5 7.95 13
S 9 9.45 11
S 10.5 10.95 9
S 12 12.45 18
S 13.5 13.95 17
S 15 15.45 20
S 16.5 16.95 25
S 18 18.35 50/200
S 19.5 19.83 50/180
S 21 21.34 50/190
S 22.5 22.79 50/140
LOG 0 7.5 SI/SN
LOG 7.5 9 SI/SN/GR
LOG 9 18 CL/SN
LOG 18 21 SN/CL
LOG 21 22.79 CL/SN
 ATTERBERG LIMITS PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION Point Rock UU Triaxial
1-D Consolidation CIU Triaxial Chemical Tests
Compression Soil
WATER STARTING ENDING SOIL SAMPLE DEPTH M/C Passing Load Test
BH NO. BH EGL REMARK SPT'N RQD CRR SG LL PL PI GRAVEL SAND SILT CLAY Void UCT Total Effective Organic Chloride Total Sulphate pH
LEVEL DEPTH DEPTH DESCRIPTION NO. 425µ Pc CC Test UCT C Φ
Ratio C Φ C Φ Content Content Sulphate Content Value
m % % % % % % % % % kPa MPa MPa kPa deg. kPa kPa deg. kPa deg. % % % mg/L

5GTBH-03 27.096 -1.2 S 1.5 1.95 2 P1/D1 1.50-1.95 32 44 28 16 6 53 25 16 3.88 <0.01 <0.01 4.6
S 3 3.45 2 U3-1 3.50-4.50 28 47 31 16 2 59 29 10 0.755 19 0.278 20 26
S 4.5 4.95 3 P3/D3 4.50-4.95 32 53 32 21 3 46 36 15
S 6 6.45 8 P5/D5 7.50-7.95 19 NP NP NP 20 52 28
S 7.5 7.95 11 P8/D8 12.00-12.45 26 43 28 15 23 34 27 16
S 9 9.45 7
S 10.5 10.95 10
S 12 12.45 8
S 13.5 13.95 9
S 15 15.45 7
S 16.5 16.95 10
S 18 18.45 15
S 19.5 19.95 19
S 21 21.45 24
S 22.5 22.95 29
S 24 24.45 32
S 25.5 25.95 23
S 27 27.44 50/290
S 28.5 28.95 19
S 30 30.435 50/285
S 31.5 31.9 50/250
LOG 0 1.5 SI/SN
LOG 1.5 4.5 CL/SN
LOG 4.5 7.5 SI/SN
LOG 7.5 15 CL/SN
LOG 15 16.5 NO RECOVERY
LOG 16.5 27 CL/SN
LOG 27 31.9 SI/SN/GR

5DBH-127 21.480 -2.8 S 1.5 1.95 7 P1/D1 1.50-1.95 25 49 26 23 4 43 19 34 0.18 <0.01 <0.01 6.5
S 3 3.45 9 P3/D3 4.50-4.95 15 NP NP NP 10 69 21
S 4.5 4.95 10 P4/D4 6.00-6.45 22 41 22 19 22 38 12 28
S 6 6.45 5 P6/D6 9.00-9.45 22 40 23 17 5 52 14 29
S 7.5 7.95 7 P8/D8 12.00-12.45 18 42 23 19 8 51 13 28
S 9 9.45 6
S 10.5 10.95 9
S 12 12.45 10
S 13.5 13.95 19
S 15 15.45 24
S 16.5 16.95 23
S 18 18.45 43
S 19.5 19.95 17
S 21 21.45 29
S 22.5 22.94 50/290
S 24 24.4 50/250
S 25.5 25.85 50/200
S 27 27.36 50/210
S 28.5 28.84 50/190
S 30 30.29 50/140
S 31.5 31.74 50/115
LOG 0 1.5 SI/SN
LOG 1.5 3 CL/SN
LOG 3 6 SN/SI
LOG 6 7.5 SI/SN
LOG 7.5 18 CL/SN
LOG 18 19.5 NO RECOVERY
LOG 19.5 21 CL/SN
LOG 21 27 SN/CL
LOG 27 30 CL/SN
LOG 30 31.74 SN/CL
 ATTERBERG LIMITS PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION Point Rock UU Triaxial
1-D Consolidation CIU Triaxial Chemical Tests
Compression Soil
WATER STARTING ENDING SOIL SAMPLE DEPTH M/C Passing Load Test
BH NO. BH EGL REMARK SPT'N RQD CRR SG LL PL PI GRAVEL SAND SILT CLAY Void UCT Total Effective Organic Chloride Total Sulphate pH
LEVEL DEPTH DEPTH DESCRIPTION NO. 425µ Pc CC Test UCT C Φ
Ratio C Φ C Φ Content Content Sulphate Content Value
m % % % % % % % % % kPa MPa MPa kPa deg. kPa kPa deg. kPa deg. % % % mg/L

5DBH-128 33.522 -3.92 S 1.5 1.95 3 P1/D1 1.50-1.95 23 37 29 8 5 51 30 14 0.1 <0.01 <0.01 6.6
S 4.5 4.95 5 UD1 3.00-4.00 22 35 28 7 5 59 25 11 0.675 63 0.268 55 9
S 6 6.45 6 P5/D4 9.00-9.45 20 NP NP NP 9 64 27
S 7.5 7.95 5 P7/D6 12.00-12.45 30 47 29 18 1 20 47 32
S 9 9.45 6 P14/D12 22.50-22.95 20 NP NP NP 37 39 24
S 10.5 10.95 5
S 12 12.45 7
S 13.5 13.95 21
S 15 15.45 14
S 16.5 16.95 16
S 18 18.45 18
S 19.5 19.95 21
S 21 21.45 33
S 22.5 22.95 25
S 24 24.45 31
S 25.5 25.95 13
S 27 27.45 8
S 28.5 28.95 12
S 30 30.45 11
S 31.5 31.95 13
S 33 33.45 16
S 34.5 34.95 12
S 36 36.45 22
S 37.5 37.95 38
S 39 39.45 40
S 40.5 40.74 50/130
S 42 42.25 50/110
S 43.5 43.95 50/300
S 45 45.34 50/190
S 46.5 46.875 50/225
S 48 48.3 50/150
S 49.5 49.72 50/75
S 51 51.3 50/150
S 52.5 52.69 50/90
S 54 54.3 50/150
S 55.5 55.655 50/70
S 57 57.165 50/75
S 58.5 58.68 50/105
S 60 60.13 50/70
LOG 0 1.5 GR
LOG 1.5 7.5 CL/SN
LOG 7.5 9 NO RECOVERY
LOG 9 10.5 CL/SN/GR
LOG 10.5 13.5 CL/SI
LOG 13.5 15 CL/SI/GR
LOG 15 18 CL/SI
LOG 18 19.5 SN/SI/GR
LOG 19.5 21 SN
LOG 21 22.5 NO RECOVERY
LOG 22.5 25.5 SN/CL/GR
LOG 25.5 28.5 CL/SN/GR
LOG 28.5 30 SN/SI/GR
LOG 30 31.5 SN/CL/GR
LOG 31.5 34.5 SN
LOG 34.5 36 CL/SN
LOG 36 37.5 SN/SI/GR
LOG 37.5 39 SN/CL/GR
LOG 39 40.5 SN/GR
LOG 40.5 43.5 SI/SN
LOG 43.5 45 SN/SI
LOG 45 48 SN/CL
LOG 48 49.5 SN/CL/GR
LOG 49.5 51 SN/CL
LOG 51 52.5 SI/CL/GR
LOG 52.5 55.5 SI/CL
LOG 55.5 57 SI/SN
LOG 57 58.5 SI/CL
LOG 58.5 60 SI/GR
LOG 60 60.13 SI/SN
 ATTERBERG LIMITS PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION Point Rock UU Triaxial
1-D Consolidation CIU Triaxial Chemical Tests
Compression Soil
WATER STARTING ENDING SOIL SAMPLE DEPTH M/C Passing Load Test
BH NO. BH EGL REMARK SPT'N RQD CRR SG LL PL PI GRAVEL SAND SILT CLAY Void UCT Total Effective Organic Chloride Total Sulphate pH
LEVEL DEPTH DEPTH DESCRIPTION NO. 425µ Pc CC Test UCT C Φ
Ratio C Φ C Φ Content Content Sulphate Content Value
m % % % % % % % % % kPa MPa MPa kPa deg. kPa kPa deg. kPa deg. % % % mg/L

5DBH-129 34.459 -1.1 S 1.5 1.95 1 P1/D1 1.50-1.95 24 46 30 16 15 43 30 12 2.89 <0.01 <0.01 4.5
S 3 3.45 5 P2/D2 3.00-3.45 23 37 26 11 6 57 23 14
S 6 6.45 8 UD1 4.50-5.50 43 17 26 4 32
S 7.5 7.95 6 P3/D3 6.00-6.45 28 50 30 20 6 49 29 16
S 9 9.45 5 P5/D5 9.00-9.45 20 44 28 16 7 57 22 14
S 10.5 10.95 6 P7/D7 12.00-12.45 22 37 28 9 14 44 32 10
S 12 12.45 7 P9/D9 15.00-15.45 25 45 29 16 6 57 24 13
S 13.5 13.95 6
S 15 15.45 9
S 16.5 16.95 14
S 18 18.45 17
S 19.5 19.95 13
S 21 21.45 19
S 22.5 22.95 21
S 24 24.45 22
S 25.5 25.95 26
S 27 27.45 25
S 28.5 28.95 27
S 30 30.45 27
S 31.5 31.95 24
S 33 33.45 32
S 34.5 34.95 29
S 36 36.45 33
S 37.5 37.95 38
S 39 39.45 29
S 40.5 40.95 39
S 42 42.45 42
S 43.5 43.95 50/300
S 45 45.31 50/160
S 46.5 46.95 36
S 48 48.45 39
S 49.5 49.95 43
S 51 51.45 19
S 52.5 52.95 45
S 54 54.45 37
S 55.5 55.95 38
S 57 57.45 48
S 58.5 58.79 50/140
S 60 60.25 50/100
S 61.5 61.81 50/160
S 63 63.19 50/70
S 64.5 64.635 50/65
S 66 66.14 50/55
S 67.5 67.715 50/105
S 69 69.13 50/70
S 70.5 70.63 50/55
LOG 0 1.5 SI/CL
LOG 1.5 3 CL/SN/GR
LOG 3 6 CL/SN
LOG 6 10.5 CL/SN/GR
LOG 10.5 12 SN/SI/GR
LOG 12 13.5 CL/SN/GR
LOG 13.5 15 SN/SI/GR
LOG 15 16.5 CL/SN/GR
LOG 16.5 18 NO RECOVERY
LOG 18 21 CL/SI
LOG 21 22.5 CL/SN
LOG 22.5 25.5 SN/CL/GR
LOG 25.5 28.5 SN/GR
LOG 28.5 31.5 SN/CL/GR
LOG 31.5 33 SN/GR
LOG 33 34.5 SN/CL/GR
LOG 34.5 36 NO RECOVERY
LOG 36 39 SN/CL/GR
LOG 39 43.5 SN/GR
LOG 43.5 46.5 SI/SN
LOG 46.5 51 SN/GR
LOG 51 52.5 CL/SI
LOG 52.5 54 SN/SI/GR
LOG 54 55.5 SI/CL/GR
LOG 55.5 57 SI/SN
LOG 57 58.5 SN/SI/GR
LOG 58.5 61.5 SI/SN
LOG 61.5 63 SI/CL
LOG 63 66 SI/SN
LOG 66 67.5 SI/SN/GR
LOG 67.5 69 SI/GR
LOG 69 70.63 SI/SN
 ATTERBERG LIMITS PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION Point Rock UU Triaxial
1-D Consolidation CIU Triaxial Chemical Tests
Compression Soil
WATER STARTING ENDING SOIL SAMPLE DEPTH M/C Passing Load Test
BH NO. BH EGL REMARK SPT'N RQD CRR SG LL PL PI GRAVEL SAND SILT CLAY Void UCT Total Effective Organic Chloride Total Sulphate pH
LEVEL DEPTH DEPTH DESCRIPTION NO. 425µ Pc CC Test UCT C Φ
Ratio C Φ C Φ Content Content Sulphate Content Value
m % % % % % % % % % kPa MPa MPa kPa deg. kPa kPa deg. kPa deg. % % % mg/L

RB32-1 33.665 -2.1 S 1.5 1.95 3 UD1 3.50-4.50 22 36 28 8 2 53 30 15 0.653 63 0.271 56 9

S 3 3.45 6 P12/D12 19.50-19.95 21 38 29 9 22 29 32 17
S 6 6.45 9 P22/D21 34.50-34.85 18 NP NP NP 19 74 7
S 7.5 7.95 7 P27/D26 42.00-42.15 20 35 29 6 20 36 30 14
S 9 9.45 9
S 10.5 10.95 6
S 12 12.45 5
S 13.5 13.95 7
S 15 15.45 9
S 16.5 16.95 11
S 18 18.45 10
S 19.5 19.95 9
S 21 21.45 7
S 22.5 22.95 13
S 24 24.45 14
S 25.5 25.95 8
S 27 27.45 3
S 28.5 28.95 5
S 30 30.45 21
S 31.5 31.95 14
S 33 33.45 16
S 34.5 34.95 37
S 36 36.45 33
S 37.5 37.825 50/175
S 39 39.15 50/60
S 40.5 40.71 50/70
S 42 42.15 50/80
S 43.5 43.68 50/100
S 45 45.18 50/105
S 46.5 46.95 23
S 48 48.31 50/160
S 49.5 49.76 50/150
S 51 51.16 50/90
S 52.5 52.69 50/90
S 54 54.18 50/90
S 55.5 55.63 50/60
S 57 57.16 50/85
S 58.5 58.66 50/105
S 60 60.13 50/70
LOG 0 1.5 GR
LOG 1.5 3 CL/SN/GR
LOG 3 6 CL/SN
LOG 6 7.5 CL/SN/GR
LOG 7.5 18 CL/SI
LOG 18 19.5 CL/SN
LOG 19.5 21 CL/SN/GR
LOG 21 22.5 SN/GR
LOG 22.5 24 SN/SI/GR
LOG 24 25.5 SN
LOG 25.5 27 CL/SI/GR
LOG 27 28.5 CL/SN/GR
LOG 28.5 30 NO RECOVERY
LOG 30 33 CL/SN/GR
LOG 33 34.5 SN/SI/GR
LOG 34.5 36 SN/GR
LOG 36 37.5 SN
LOG 37.5 39 SI
LOG 39 42 SI/CL
LOG 42 43.5 SI/GR
LOG 43.5 45 SI/CL
LOG 45 46.5 SI
LOG 46.5 48 SI/SN
LOG 48 49.5 SI/GR
LOG 49.5 52.5 SI/SN
LOG 52.5 57 SI/CL
LOG 57 60 SI/SN
LOG 60 60.13 SI/GR
 ATTERBERG LIMITS PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION Point Rock UU Triaxial
1-D Consolidation CIU Triaxial Chemical Tests
Compression Soil
WATER STARTING ENDING SOIL SAMPLE DEPTH M/C Passing Load Test
BH NO. BH EGL REMARK SPT'N RQD CRR SG LL PL PI GRAVEL SAND SILT CLAY Void UCT Total Effective Organic Chloride Total Sulphate pH
LEVEL DEPTH DEPTH DESCRIPTION NO. 425µ Pc CC Test UCT C Φ
Ratio C Φ C Φ Content Content Sulphate Content Value
m % % % % % % % % % kPa MPa MPa kPa deg. kPa kPa deg. kPa deg. % % % mg/L

RB32-2 35.121 -1.95 S 1.5 1.95 2 UD1 7.50-8.50 23 37 28 9 10 48 29 13 0.683 67 0.241 60 9

S 3 3.45 3 P14/D13 22.50-22.95 22 38 28 10 29 25 31 15
S 4.5 4.95 15 P20/D19 31.50-31.90 17 NP NP NP 35 39 26
S 6 6.45 7 P31/D30 48.00-48.45 16 NP NP NP 1 72 27
S 9 9.45 8
S 10.5 10.95 4
S 12 12.45 5
S 13.5 13.95 7
S 15 15.45 9
S 16.5 16.95 6
S 18 18.45 21
S 19.5 19.95 28
S 21 21.45 27
S 22.5 22.95 17
S 24 24.45 19
S 25.5 25.95 18
S 27 27.45 20
S 28.5 28.95 24
S 30 30.45 21
S 31.5 31.95 35
S 33 33.45 38
S 34.5 34.95 22
S 36 36.45 21
S 37.5 37.95 24
S 39 39.45 36
S 40.5 40.8 50/150
S 42 42.285 50/135
S 43.5 43.83 50/180
S 45 45.25 50/130
S 46.5 46.95 50/300
S 48 48.45 38
S 49.5 49.95 44
LOG 0 1.5 SI/SN
LOG 1.5 3 CL/SN/GR
LOG 3 4.5 CL/GR
LOG 4.5 6 CL/SN/GR
LOG 6 7.5 CL/SN
LOG 7.5 9 SI/SN
LOG 9 12 SN/SI/GR
LOG 12 18 CL/SN/GR
LOG 18 19.5 NO RECOVERY
LOG 19.5 21 GR
LOG 21 22.5 SN/SI/GR
LOG 22.5 24 SI/GR
LOG 24 25.5 CL/SN/GR
LOG 25.5 27 GR/SI
LOG 27 31.5 SN/SI/GR
LOG 31.5 33 SN/SI
LOG 33 34.5 SN/SI/GR
LOG 34.5 36 SN/SI
LOG 36 40.5 SN/SI/GR
LOG 40.5 42 SN/CL/GR
LOG 42 43.5 SN/GR
LOG 43.5 46.5 SI/SN/GR
LOG 46.5 48 SN/CL
LOG 48 49.95 SN/SI
 ATTERBERG LIMITS PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION Point Rock UU Triaxial
1-D Consolidation CIU Triaxial Chemical Tests
Compression Soil
WATER STARTING ENDING SOIL SAMPLE DEPTH M/C Passing Load Test
BH NO. BH EGL REMARK SPT'N RQD CRR SG LL PL PI GRAVEL SAND SILT CLAY Void UCT Total Effective Organic Chloride Total Sulphate pH
LEVEL DEPTH DEPTH DESCRIPTION NO. 425µ Pc CC Test UCT C Φ
Ratio C Φ C Φ Content Content Sulphate Content Value
m % % % % % % % % % kPa MPa MPa kPa deg. kPa kPa deg. kPa deg. % % % mg/L

5DBH-130 18.638 -2.3 S 1.5 1.95 4 P1/D1 1.50-1.95 18 NP NP NP 21 56 23 0.1 <0.01 <0.01 6.8
S 3 3.45 2 U3-1 3.50-4.50 20 38 22 16 7 47 15 31 0.610 78 0.394 73 10
S 4.5 4.95 3 P5/D5 7.50-7.95 19 NP NP NP 17 66 17
S 6 6.45 6 P7/D7 10.50-10.95 18 NP NP NP 29 44 27
S 7.5 7.95 12 P9/D9 13.50-13.95 16 NP NP NP 46 40 14
S 9 9.45 9
S 10.5 10.95 6
S 12 12.45 7
S 13.5 13.95 4
S 15 15.45 5
S 16.5 16.95 10
S 18 18.45 14
S 19.5 19.95 5
S 21 21.45 8
S 22.5 22.95 24
S 24 24.45 26
S 25.5 25.95 24
S 27 27.45 27
S 28.5 28.95 11
S 30 30.45 21
LOG 0 7.5 SI/SN
LOG 7.5 10.5 SN/SI
LOG 10.5 13.5 SI/SN
LOG 13.5 16.5 SN/SI
LOG 16.5 19.5 SI/SN
LOG 19.5 22.5 CL/SI
LOG 22.5 27 SN/SI
LOG 27 28.5 SN/CL
LOG 28.5 30 NO RECOVERY
LOG 30 30.45 GR/SN

5DBH-131 16.614 -1.7 S 1.5 1.95 6 P1/D1 1.50-1.95 24 NP NP NP 6 81 13 5.48 <0.01 <0.01 4.2
S 3 3.45 5 P3/D3 4.50-4.95 22 NP NP NP 1 96 3
S 4.5 4.95 3 P6/D6 9.00-9.45 27 41 27 14 4 61 21 14
S 6 6.45 37 P10/D10 15.00-15.45 17 NP NP NP 42 34 24
S 7.5 7.95 21
S 9 9.45 12
S 10.5 10.95 13
S 12 12.45 12
S 13.5 13.95 11
S 15 15.45 19
S 16.5 16.95 21
S 18 18.33 50/180
S 19.5 19.79 50/145
S 21 21.41 50/260
S 22.5 22.86 50/210
S 24 24.45 34
S 25.5 25.95 37
S 27 27.37 50/220
S 28.5 28.85 50/200
S 30 30.32 50/170
LOG 0 1.5 SI/SN
LOG 1.5 3.5 SN/SI
LOG 3.5 4.5 NO RECOVERY
LOG 4.5 9 SN/SI
LOG 9 15 SI/SN
LOG 15 18 CL/SN
LOG 18 21 SN/SI/GR
LOG 21 24 SN/CL/GR
LOG 24 27 CL/SN
LOG 27 28.5 CL/SN/GR
LOG 28.5 30 CL/SN
LOG 30 30.32 SN/CL
 ATTERBERG LIMITS PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION Point Rock UU Triaxial
1-D Consolidation CIU Triaxial Chemical Tests
Compression Soil
WATER STARTING ENDING SOIL SAMPLE DEPTH M/C Passing Load Test
BH NO. BH EGL REMARK SPT'N RQD CRR SG LL PL PI GRAVEL SAND SILT CLAY Void UCT Total Effective Organic Chloride Total Sulphate pH
LEVEL DEPTH DEPTH DESCRIPTION NO. 425µ Pc CC Test UCT C Φ
Ratio C Φ C Φ Content Content Sulphate Content Value
m % % % % % % % % % kPa MPa MPa kPa deg. kPa kPa deg. kPa deg. % % % mg/L

5DBH-132 12.396 -2.25 S 1.5 1.95 2 P1/D1 1.50-1.95 19 38 22 16 3 56 13 28 0.12 <0.01 <0.01 6.8
S 3 3.45 1 P2/D2 3.00-3.45 26 52 26 26 3 16 38 43
S 4.5 4.95 1 P4/D4 6.00-6.45 19 NP NP NP 13 58 29
S 6 6.45 4 P7/D7 10.50-10.95 17 NP NP NP 0 93 7
S 7.5 7.95 6 P10/D9 15.00-15.45 19 38 21 17 8 45 31 16
S 9 9.45 8
S 10.5 10.95 9
S 12 12.45 11
S 13.5 13.95 9
S 15 15.45 11
S 16.5 16.95 15
S 18 18.45 24
S 19.5 19.95 21
S 21 21.45 19
S 22.5 22.94 50/290
S 24 24.45 32
S 25.5 25.95 25
S 27 27.45 33
S 28.5 28.95 37
S 30 30.45 35
LOG 0 1.5 SI/SN
LOG 1.5 3 SI/SN/GR
LOG 3 3.5 SN/SI
LOG 3.5 4.5 NO RECOVERY
LOG 4.5 6 SN/SI
LOG 6 6.5 SI/SN
LOG 6.5 7.5 NO RECOVERY
LOG 7.5 9 SI/SN
LOG 9 10.5 SI/SN/GR
LOG 10.5 12 SN/SI
LOG 12 13.5 NO RECOVERY
LOG 13.5 15 SN/SI
LOG 15 21 SI/SN
LOG 21 22.5 CL/SN
LOG 22.5 24 CL/SN/GR
LOG 24 27 SN/CL
LOG 27 30 SI/SN/GR
LOG 30 30.45 CL/SN
 ATTERBERG LIMITS PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION Point Rock UU Triaxial
1-D Consolidation CIU Triaxial Chemical Tests
Compression Soil
WATER STARTING ENDING SOIL SAMPLE DEPTH M/C Passing Load Test
BH NO. BH EGL REMARK SPT'N RQD CRR SG LL PL PI GRAVEL SAND SILT CLAY Void UCT Total Effective Organic Chloride Total Sulphate pH
LEVEL DEPTH DEPTH DESCRIPTION NO. 425µ Pc CC Test UCT C Φ
Ratio C Φ C Φ Content Content Sulphate Content Value
m % % % % % % % % % kPa MPa MPa kPa deg. kPa kPa deg. kPa deg. % % % mg/L

5DBH-133 9.392 -1 S 1.5 1.95 2 P1/D1 1.50-1.95 42 57 32 25 4 15 49 32 3.34 <0.01 <0.01 4.6
S 3 3.45 1 U3-1 2.00-3.00 36 51 30 21 5 39 35 21 1.019 19 0.264 24 14
S 4.5 4.95 3 P4/D4 6.00-6.45 43 61 34 27 1 53 31 15
S 7.5 7.76 50/110 P6/D6 9.00-9.45 30 45 28 17 11 27 37 25
S 9 9.45 12 P7/D7 10.50-10.95 27 50 32 18 0 18 60 22
S 10.5 10.95 12
S 12 12.45 11
S 13.5 13.95 14
S 15 15.45 6
S 16.5 16.95 7
S 18 18.45 15
S 19.5 19.95 22
S 21 21.45 19
S 22.5 22.95 24
S 24 24.45 26
S 25.5 25.95 17
S 27 27.45 21
S 28.5 28.82 50/170
S 30 30.27 50/120
S 31.5 31.76 50/110
S 33 33.15 50/50
S 34.5 34.76 50/110
S 36 36.17 50/60
S 37.5 37.64 50/40
S 39 39.17 50/60
S 40.5 40.63 50/30
S 42 42.1 50/40
S 43.5 43.66 50/40
S 45 45.1 50/40
S 46.5 46.6 50/45
LOG 0 1.5 SI/SN/GR
LOG 1.5 2 SI/SN
LOG 2 3 SI/SN/GR
LOG 3 6 SI/SN
LOG 6 7.5 CL/SN
LOG 7.5 9 SN
LOG 9 10.5 SI/SN/GR
LOG 10.5 12 SI/CL
LOG 12 15 SI/SN
LOG 15 18 SN/SI
LOG 18 19.5 SI/SN
LOG 19.5 22.5 SN
LOG 22.5 24 NO RECOVERY
LOG 24 25.5 SI/SN/GR
LOG 25.5 28.5 SI/CL/GR
LOG 28.5 30 GR/SN
LOG 30 33 SN
LOG 33 34.5 GR/SN
LOG 34.5 36 SN
LOG 36 39 SI/SN/GR
LOG 39 40.5 SI/SN
LOG 40.5 42 GR/SN
LOG 42 45 SI/SN
LOG 45 46.6 GR/SN
 ATTERBERG LIMITS PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION Point Rock UU Triaxial
1-D Consolidation CIU Triaxial Chemical Tests
Compression Soil
WATER STARTING ENDING SOIL SAMPLE DEPTH M/C Passing Load Test
BH NO. BH EGL REMARK SPT'N RQD CRR SG LL PL PI GRAVEL SAND SILT CLAY Void UCT Total Effective Organic Chloride Total Sulphate pH
LEVEL DEPTH DEPTH DESCRIPTION NO. 425µ Pc CC Test UCT C Φ
Ratio C Φ C Φ Content Content Sulphate Content Value
m % % % % % % % % % kPa MPa MPa kPa deg. kPa kPa deg. kPa deg. % % % mg/L

5DBH-134 8.936 -1 S 1.5 1.95 4 U3-1 2.00-3.00 34 52 33 19 4 34 46 16 0.926 26 0.294 22 14 3.23 <0.01 <0.01 4.9
S 3 3.45 4 P3/D3 4.50-4.95 77 104 39 65 0 6 35 59
S 6 6.45 1 P6/D6 9.00-9.45 27 45 29 16 2 60 24 14
S 7.5 7.95 2 P9/D9 13.50-13.95 21 42 29 13 16 48 26 10
S 9 9.45 10
S 10.5 10.95 14
S 12 12.45 16
S 13.5 13.95 17
S 15 15.45 15
S 16.5 16.95 19
S 18 18.45 14
S 19.5 19.95 14
S 21 21.45 20
S 22.5 22.95 21
S 24 24.45 23
S 25.5 25.95 24
S 27 27.45 29
S 28.5 28.77 50/120
S 30 30.26 50/110
S 31.5 31.64 50/40
S 33 33.25 50/100
S 34.5 34.65 50/40
S 36 36.16 50/40
S 37.5 37.77 50/120
S 39 39.15 50/30
S 40.5 40.66 50/40
S 42 42.11 50/50
S 43.5 43.66 50/35
S 45 45.11 50/40
S 46.5 46.6 50/40
LOG 0 4.5 SI/SN
LOG 4.5 9 CL/SI
LOG 9 10.5 CL/SN
LOG 10.5 13.5 CL/SN/GR
LOG 13.5 21 SI/SN/GR
LOG 21 24 SI/SN
LOG 24 25.5 SN/SI
LOG 25.5 27 SN
LOG 27 30 SI/SN
LOG 30 31.5 NO RECOVERY
LOG 31.5 33 SI/SN/GR
LOG 33 37.5 SN/SI
LOG 37.5 39 SI/SN/GR
LOG 39 40.5 SI/SN
LOG 40.5 42 SI/SN/GR
LOG 42 43.5 GR/SN
LOG 43.5 46.6 SI/SN/GR

5DBH-135 8.747 -2.3 S 1.5 1.95 2 P1/D1 1.50-1.95 27 51 31 20 5 46 32 17 9.23 <0.01 <0.01 4.6
S 3 3.45 2 U3-1 2.00-3.00 49 64 36 28 0 25 56 19 1.266 19 0.288 20 10
S 4.5 4.95 3 P2/D2 3.00-3.45 39 56 33 23 4 41 39 16
S 6 6.45 3 P4/D4 6.00-6.45 23 NP NP NP 4 88 8
S 7.5 7.95 5 P6/D6 9.00-9.26 21 NP NP NP 21 57 22
S 9 9.26 50/110
S 10.5 10.95 18
S 12 12.45 26
S 13.5 13.95 22
S 15 15.27 50/120
S 16.5 16.67 50/50
S 18 18.15 50/40
S 19.5 19.63 50/20
S 21 21.12 50/20
S 22.5 22.6 50/50
S 24 24.1 50/45
LOG 0 1.5 GR/SN
LOG 1.5 3 CL/SN/GR
LOG 3 6 SN/SI
LOG 6 9 SN
LOG 9 12 SI/SN/GR
LOG 12 15 SN
LOG 15 16.5 SI/SN
LOG 16.5 19.5 SI/SN/GR
LOG 19.5 24.1 GR/SN
 ATTERBERG LIMITS PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION Point Rock UU Triaxial
1-D Consolidation CIU Triaxial Chemical Tests
Compression Soil
WATER STARTING ENDING SOIL SAMPLE DEPTH M/C Passing Load Test
BH NO. BH EGL REMARK SPT'N RQD CRR SG LL PL PI GRAVEL SAND SILT CLAY Void UCT Total Effective Organic Chloride Total Sulphate pH
LEVEL DEPTH DEPTH DESCRIPTION NO. 425µ Pc CC Test UCT C Φ
Ratio C Φ C Φ Content Content Sulphate Content Value
m % % % % % % % % % kPa MPa MPa kPa deg. kPa kPa deg. kPa deg. % % % mg/L

5DBH-136 13.343 -0.9 S 1.5 1.95 0 P1/D1 1.50-1.95 20 NP NP NP 7 64 29 0.08 <0.01 <0.01 6.9
S 3 3.45 1 UD1 3.50-4.50 22 37 29 8 1 57 29 13 0.690 67 0.237 44 8
S 4.5 4.95 3 UD2 6.50-7.50 23 42 31 11 9 40 33 18 0.672 78 0.206 52 8
S 6 6.45 4 P8/D8 12.00-12.45 20 35 29 6 4 55 28 13
S 7.5 7.95 7
S 9 9.45 10
S 10.5 10.95 9
S 12 12.45 8
S 13.5 13.95 9
S 15 15.45 11
S 16.5 16.95 20
S 18 18.45 22
S 19.5 19.95 32
S 21 21.45 27
S 22.5 22.95 30
S 24 24.45 22
S 25.5 25.95 24
S 27 27.45 31
S 28.5 28.95 29
S 30 30.45 32
S 31.5 31.95 21
S 33 33.45 19
S 34.5 34.95 23
S 36 36.45 26
S 37.5 37.95 28
S 39 39.45 23
S 40.5 40.95 30
S 42 42.45 34
S 43.5 43.95 26
S 45 45.155 50/80
S 46.5 46.6 50/35
S 48 48.11 50/45
S 49.5 49.54 50/15
S 51 51.03 50/10
S 52.5 52.6 50/40
S 54 54.29 50/140
S 55.5 55.57 50/30
S 57 57.05 50/20
S 58.5 58.77 50/135
S 60 60.1 50/40
S 61.5 61.62 50/50
S 63 63.09 50/40
LOG 0 1.5 SI/SN
LOG 1.5 3 SN/SI
LOG 3 4.5 SI/SN
LOG 4.5 6.5 SI/SN/GR
LOG 6.5 9 SI/SN
LOG 9 13.5 SI/SN/GR
LOG 13.5 16.5 SI/SN
LOG 16.5 25.5 SI/SN/GR
LOG 25.5 27 SI/SN
LOG 27 28.5 SI/SN/GR
LOG 28.5 31.5 SI/SN
LOG 31.5 33 SI/SN/GR
LOG 33 34.5 SI/SN
LOG 34.5 37.5 SI/SN/GR
LOG 37.5 45 SI/SN
LOG 45 46.5 SN/SI
LOG 46.5 48 SN/SI/GR
LOG 48 49.5 GR
LOG 49.5 52.5 NO RECOVERY
LOG 52.5 54 SN/GR
LOG 54 55.5 SI/SN/GR
LOG 55.5 57 SN/GR
LOG 57 58.5 NO RECOVERY
LOG 58.5 63 SI/SN/GR
LOG 63 63.09 SN/GR
 ATTERBERG LIMITS PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION Point Rock UU Triaxial
1-D Consolidation CIU Triaxial Chemical Tests
Compression Soil
WATER STARTING ENDING SOIL SAMPLE DEPTH M/C Passing Load Test
BH NO. BH EGL REMARK SPT'N RQD CRR SG LL PL PI GRAVEL SAND SILT CLAY Void UCT Total Effective Organic Chloride Total Sulphate pH
LEVEL DEPTH DEPTH DESCRIPTION NO. 425µ Pc CC Test UCT C Φ
Ratio C Φ C Φ Content Content Sulphate Content Value
m % % % % % % % % % kPa MPa MPa kPa deg. kPa kPa deg. kPa deg. % % % mg/L

5DBH-137 12.540 -1 S 1.5 1.95 15 P2/D2 3.00-3.45 19 35 29 6 7 50 29 14 0.1 <0.01 <0.01 6.8
S 3 3.45 11 U3/1 6.50-7.50 19 40 29 11 11 38 35 16 0.592 64 0.254 60 8
S 4.5 4.95 16 U3/2 8.00-9.00 20 37 27 10 1 54 30 15 0.622 79 0.233 72 10
S 6 6.45 8 P6/D6 9.00-9.45 18 NP NP NP 12 63 25
S 7.5 7.95 7 P7/D7 10.50-10.95 19 NP NP NP 14 55 31
S 9 9.45 8
S 10.5 10.95 6
S 12 12.45 9
S 13.5 13.95 8
S 15 15.45 6
S 16.5 16.95 15
S 18 18.45 23
S 19.5 19.95 20
S 21 21.45 22
S 22.5 22.95 26
S 24 24.45 23
S 25.5 25.95 23
S 27 27.45 33
S 28.5 28.95 25
S 30 30.45 30
S 31.5 31.95 22
S 33 33.45 27
S 34.5 34.95 15
S 36 36.45 16
S 37.5 37.95 33
S 39 39.45 26
S 40.5 40.95 33
S 42 42.41 50/260
S 43.5 43.95 50/250
S 45 45.37 50/220
S 46.5 46.83 50/180
S 48 48.34 50/190
S 49.5 49.76 50/125
S 51 51.3 50/150
S 52.5 52.57 50/30
S 54 54.13 50/55
S 55.5 55.24 50/135
S 57 57.07 50/30
S 58.5 58.645 50/60
S 60 60.09 50/35
LOG 0 1.5 SI/SN
LOG 1.5 3 SI/SN/ROOT
LOG 3 7.5 SI/SN
LOG 7.5 8 SN/SI
LOG 8 9 SI/SN
LOG 9 10.5 SN/SI
LOG 10.5 12 SI/SN
LOG 12 13.5 SI/SN/GR
LOG 13.5 15 SI/SN
LOG 15 16.5 SI/SN/GR
LOG 16.5 18 SI/SN
LOG 18 25.5 SI/SN/GR
LOG 25.5 27 SI/SN
LOG 27 30 SI/SN/GR
LOG 30 33 SI/SN
LOG 33 34.5 SI/SN/GR
LOG 34.5 36 NO RECOVERY
LOG 36 37.5 SI/SN
LOG 37.5 39 SN/SI/GR
LOG 39 40.5 SI/SN
LOG 40.5 42 SI/SN/GR
LOG 42 49.5 SI/SN
LOG 49.5 52.5 SI/SN/GR
LOG 52.5 54 NO RECOVERY
LOG 54 55.5 SN/GR
LOG 55.5 60 SN/SI/GR
LOG 60 60.09 SI/GR
APPENDIX B
SI PLOTS
BHSum

PROJECT : EDT GEMAS TO JOHOR BAHRU SECTION 5 (BLOCK 15)

GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION - ATTERBERG LIMIT

LIQUID LIMIT (%) PLASTIC LIMIT (%) PLASTICITY INDEX (%) MOISTURE CONTENT (%)

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 0 20 40 60 80 100 0 20 40 60 80 100 0 20 40 60 80 100

0

10

15

20
DEPTH (m)

25

30

35

40

45

50

5DBH-109 5DBH-110 5DBH-111 5DBH-112 5DBH-113 5DBH-115 5DBH-116 5DBH-117 5DBH-118 5DBH-119 5DBH-120 5DBH-121 RB30-1 RB30-2 5DBH-122 5DBH-123

5DBH-124 5GTBH-01 5DBH-125 5DBH-126 RB31-1 RB31-2 5GTBH-02 5GTBH-03 5DBH-127 5DBH-128 5DBH-129 RB32-1 RB32-2 5DBH-130 5DBH-77 5DBH-132

5DBH-133 5DBH-134 5DBH-135 5DBH-136 5DBH-137 ABH-138 ABH-139 ABH-140 ABH-141 ABH-142 ABH-143 ABH-144 ABH-145 ABH-146

(Appendix B) 5/10/2018
 SOIL INVESTIGATION WORKS FOR
ELECTRIFIED DOUBLE TRACK PROJECT
KLUANG-JB FOR SECTION 5 (BLOCK 15)

Su Vs DEPTH (Overall)
Su, kN/m2
0 20 40 60 80 100
0

Su = 30

4
DEPTH, (m)

10

12

5DBH-110 5DBH-112 5DBH-116 5DBH-118 5BH-120 5DBH-124

5DBH-125 RB31-2 5DBH-128 5DBH-134 5DBH-136

 SOIL INVESTIGATION WORKS FOR
ELECTRIFIED DOUBLE TRACK PROJECT
KLUANG-JB FOR SECTION 5 (BLOCK 15)

CR Vs DEPTH (Overall)
CR
0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4
0

CR = 0.15

4
DEPTH, (m)

10

12
5DBH-110 5DBH-111 5DBH-116 5DBH-124 5DBH-125 5DBH-126

RB31-1 RB31-2 5GTBH-02 5GTBH-03 5DBH-128 RB32-1

RB32-2 5DBH-133 5DBH-134 5DBH-135 5DBH-137

BHSum

SOIL INVESTIGATION WORKS FOR ELECTRIFIED DOUBLE TRACK

PROJECT GEMAS TO JOHOR BAHRU FOR SECTION 5 (BLOCK 15)

CR Vs DEPTH (CRITICAL)
BASED ON LIQUID LIMIT, PLASTICITY INDEX AND LAB RESULT
CR
0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.22 0.25 0.3
0

3
DEPTH, (m)

Cc = 0.009(LL-10) Cc=PI/74 CR(Lab)

(Appendix B) 5/10/2018
 SOIL INVESTIGATION WORKS FOR ELECTRIFIED DOUBLE TRACK
PROJECT KLUANG-JB FOR SECTION 5 (BLOCK 15)

Cv Vs DEPTH (Overall)
APPLIED PRESSURE = 100 kPa Cv, m2/year
0 2 4 5 6 8 10 12 14
0

Cv = 5 m2/year x 2
= 10 m2/year
1

3
DEPTH, (m)

5DBH-110 5DBH-116 5DBH-124 5DBH-125 5DBH-126 RB31-1 RB31-2 5GTBH-02 5GTBH-03

5DBH-128 RB32-1 RB32-2 5DBH-133 5DBH-135 5DBH-136 5DBH-137 5DBH-134

 SOIL INVESTIGATION WORKS FOR ELECTRIFIED DOUBLE TRACK
PROJECT KLUANG-JB FOR SECTION 5 (BLOCK 15)

Cv Vs DEPTH (Critical)
Based on Liquid Limit
Cv, m2/year
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
0

Cv = 5 m2/year
1

2
DEPTH, (m)

5DBH-111 5DBH-112 5DBH-113 5DBH-118 5DBH-119 5DBH-122 5GTBH-01

t-s Plot

SOIL INVESTIGATION WORKS FOR ELECTRIFIED DOUBLE TRACK PROJECT GEMAS-JB FOR SECTION 5 (BLOCK 15)
t--s PLOT (SPTN>4)
600
*Adopted value:
C' = 1 kPa
500 Φ' = 27°
y = 0.46x + 1

UPPER BOUNDARY α = 30°

400
Φ' = sin−1 (tan α) a' = 3 kPa
m
C' = 4 kPa
Φ' = 35° 1
t = [(s1' - s3')/2]

C' = a'/cos Φ'

300
α = 22°

200
LOWER BOUNDARY
a' = 0 kPa
C' = 0 kPa
100
Φ' = 24°

0
a
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000
s = [(s1' + s3')/2]
5DBH-125 5DBH-129 ABH-140 ABH-140 ABH-141 ABH-142 ABH-142 ABH-142 ABH-143 ABH-144 ABH-145 ABH-146

(Appendix B) 5/10/2018
 APPENDIX C
SUMMARY OF GROUND TREATMENT
FULL Removal & Replacement
(R&R)
REMOVE AND REPLACE (R&R) ( TYPE 1)

LENGTH OF THICKNESS
CHAINAGE REFERENCES SI
TREATMENT OF R&R
CONE
MACKINTOSH PROBE
FROM TO m m BOREHOLE PENETRATION TRIAL PIT (TP)
(MP)
TEST (CPT)
AMP-277,AMP-
278,AMP-279,AMP-
746150 746175 25 34)
280,AMP-281,AMP-
282,AMP-283,MP1897
747625 747650 25 3.0
747650 747675 25 2.0 AMP-292,5AMP-5043
747950 748025 75 1.54) MP1916
748025 748075 50 2.5 5DAMP-5049
749550 749625 75 3.5 AMP-297
751125 751150 25 2.0 AMP-5057
751900 751975 75 3.0 MP1957 5-ATP-0085
AMP-307,AMP-
752550 752550 3.54)
308,MP1963
5DAMP-5053,5DAMP-
5054,5DAMP-
752550 752700 150 34) 5-ATP-0087
5055,AMP-309,AMP-
310,AMP-311,MP1964
ABH-143,
753425 753500 75 2.54) MP1977 5-ATP-0090
5DBH-132
753725 753825 100 2.54) MP1980 5-ATP-0091
4) 5DBH-133,
753825 753975 150 1.5 MP1981,MP1982
5DBH-134
 PARTIAL Removal &
Replacement (R&R+S)
Block 15 REMOVE AND REPLACE (R&R) WITH SURCHARGE PRELOADING (TYPE 5)

THICKNESS
LENGTH OF THICKNESS THICKNESS OF ALLOWABLE DURATION
CHAINAGE OF SOFT REFERENCES SI
TREATMENT OF R&R SURCHARGE FOR SURCHARGE
LAYER
REMARKS
CONE
MACKINTOSH PROBE
FROM TO m m m m months BOREHOLE PENETRATION TRIAL PIT (TP)
(MP)
TEST (CPT)
MP1899,MP1900,MP1 5-ATP-0066,
746325 746675 350 3.0 2.1 1.0 2.0 5DBH-109 -
901,MP1902 5-ATP-0067
746675 746775 100 2.0 1.6 1.0 2.0 MP1903 -
AMP-284,AMP-
747000 747200 200 3.0 1.4 1.0 2.0 5DBH-110 5DCPT - 16 285,AMP- 5-ATP-0069 -
286,MP1906,MP1907
AMP-287,AMP-
Surcharge increased from 1.0m to
747200 747375 175 1.0 3.0 1.5* 2.0 288,AMP-289,AMP- 5-ATP-0070
1.5m
290,MP1908,MP1909
AMP-303,AMP-
750400 750575 175 3.0 1.8 1.0 2.0 5DBH-123 5-ATP-0081 -
304,AMP-305,AMP-306
5CPT-06,
5CPT-07, AMP-5058,AMP-
5GTBH-02,
5CPT-08, 5059,AMP-5060,AMP- Surcharge increased from 1.0m to
751575 751900 325 2.0 3.0 2.0* 2.0 5DBH-127, 5-ATP-0084
5CPT-09, 5061,AMP-5062,AMP- 2.0m
5GTBH-03
5CPT-10, 5063,MP1955,MP1956
5CPT-11
5DAMP-5056,5DAMP-
5057,AMP-312,AMP-
313,AMP-314,AMP-
752700 752850 150 3.0 1.8 1.0 2.0 5DBH-130 5-ATP-0088 -
315,MP1965,MP1966,
MP1967,MP1968,MP1
969
STONE COLUMN
STONE COLUMN (TYPE 2)

SPACING OF STONE
CHAINAGE REFERENCES SI
COLUMN LENGTH OF
LENGTH OF THICKNESS OF
STONE
TREATMENT UNDER UNDER SIDE SURCHARGE CONE
COLUMN
FROM TO TRACK, So SLOPE, S1 BOREHOLE PENETRATION MACKINTOSH PROBE (MP) TRIAL PIT (TP)
TEST (CPT)
m m m m m
AMP-291,AMP-5038,AMP-
747375 747625 250 2.0 2.0 1.0 13.5 5DBH-111 5DCPT - 17 5039,AMP-5040,AMP-5041,AMP- 5-ATP-0071
5042,MP1910,MP1911,MP1912
AMP-5044,AMP-5045,AMP-
749275 749550 275 2.0 1.7 1.0 7.5 5DBH-119 5DCPT-18 5046,AMP-5047,AMP-5048,AMP- 5-ATP-0078
5049
AMP-298,AMP-299,AMP-300,AMP-
750025 750250 225 2.0 1.7 1.0 7.5 5DBH-122 5DCPT-19 5-ATP-0080
301
5CPT-01, AMP-5050,AMP-5051,AMP-
5DBH-124,
750750 751125 375 1.7 1.7 1.0 10.0 5CPT-03, 5052,AMP-5053,AMP-5054,AMP- 5-ATP-0082
5GTBH-01
5CPT-04 5055,AMP-5056,5DMP-06
PILED EMBANKMENT
Block 15 PILE EMBANKMENT (TYPE 3)

PILE SLAB REFERENCES SI

Thickness LENGTH OF
CHAINAGE ESTIMATED PILE CONE
of Soft Soil TREATMENT SIZE SPACING THICKNESS REINFORCEMENT MACKINTOSH PROBE TRIAL PIT
LENGTH BOREHOLE PENETRATION
(MP) (TP)
FROM TO m m mm m m mm TOP (TT & LT) BOTTOM (TB & LB) TEST (CPT)
5AMP 5036,5AMP
746080 746100 9.0 20 250 15.0 1.95 425 T12 - 200 T12 - 200 5037,AMP-273,AMP- 5-ATP-0065
274
746100 746150 4.5 50 250 15.0 2.10 425 T12 - 200 T12 - 200 5DCPT-15 AMP-275,AMP-276
748075 748125 6.0 50 250 15.0 1.70 425 T12 - 200 T12 - 200 5DBH-112 5DAMP-5050 5-ATP-0073
748225 748300 >5.1 75 250 15.0 2.10 425 T12 - 200 T12 - 200 5DBH-116 5DCPT-27 AMP-294
 APPENDIX D
SLOPE STABILITY ANALYSIS
 FULL R&R
NORMAL TRAIN LIVE LOAD CONDITION
 EDT from Gemas to Johor Bahru Name: Fill Material
Section 5 Model: Mohr-Coulomb
Unit Weight: 20 kN/m³
Cohesion: 5 kPa
Block 15 (CH. 749550) Phi: 30 °
Piezometric Line: 1
Long Term Stability (Normal) Name: SPT-N <4
Model: Undrained (Phi=0)
Unit Weight: 16 kN/m³
Cohesion: 20 kPa
Full R&R Piezometric Line: 1
1.1m Embankment - 3.5m R&R.gsz
Method: Morgenstern-Price Name: SPT-N <4 (2)
Model: Undrained (Phi=0)
Unit Weight: 16 kN/m³
Cohesion: 30 kPa
Piezometric Line: 1

Name: SPT-N 4-8

Model: Mohr-Coulomb
Unit Weight: 17 kN/m³
Cohesion: 1 kPa
57.2 kPa 57.2 kPa
2.812 Phi: 27 °
Piezometric Line: 1
6.6kPa 6.6kPa 6.6kPa
SPT-N <4 Fill Material SPT-N <4
SPT-N <4 (2) SPT-N <4 (2)

SPT-N 4-8

C:\Users\Tim\Desktop\Block 13 & 14 & 15 Report\B15\Slope W\R&R\Long Term\Normal\

 EDT from Gemas to Johor Bahru Name: Fill Material
Section 5 Model: Mohr-Coulomb
Unit Weight: 20 kN/m³
Cohesion: 5 kPa
Block 15 (CH. 747625) Phi: 30 °
Piezometric Line: 1
Long Term Stability (Normal) Name: SPT-N <4
Model: Undrained (Phi=0)
Unit Weight: 16 kN/m³
Cohesion: 20 kPa
Full R&R Piezometric Line: 1
2.4m Embankment - 3m R&R.gsz
Method: Morgenstern-Price Name: SPT-N <4 (2)
Model: Undrained (Phi=0)
Unit Weight: 16 kN/m³
Cohesion: 30 kPa
Piezometric Line: 1

Name: SPT-N 4-8

Model: Mohr-Coulomb
Unit Weight: 17 kN/m³
57.2 kPa 57.2 kPa
2.381 Cohesion: 1 kPa
Phi: 27 °
6.6 kPa 6.6 kPa 6.6 kPa Piezometric Line: 1
SPT-N <4 Fill Material SPT-N <4
SPT-N <4 (2) SPT-N <4 (2)

SPT-N 4-8

C:\Users\Tim\Desktop\Block 13 & 14 & 15 Report\B15\Slope W\R&R\Long Term\Normal\

 Name: Fill Material
Model: Mohr-Coulomb
EDT from Gemas to Johor Bahru Unit Weight: 20 kN/m³
Section 5 Cohesion: 5 kPa
Phi: 30 °
Piezometric Line: 1
Block 15 (CH. 748050)
Name: SPT-N <4
Model: Undrained (Phi=0)
Long Term Stability (Normal) Unit Weight: 16 kN/m³
Cohesion: 20 kPa
Piezometric Line: 1
Full R&R
4.1m Embankment - 2.5m R&R.gsz Name: SPT-N <4 (2)
Method: Morgenstern-Price Model: Undrained (Phi=0)
Unit Weight: 16 kN/m³
Cohesion: 30 kPa
Piezometric Line: 1

Name: SPT-N 4-8

Model: Mohr-Coulomb
57.2 kPa 57.2 kPa 2.010 Unit Weight: 17 kN/m³
Cohesion: 1 kPa
6.6 kPa 6.6 kPa 6.6 kPa Phi: 27 °
Piezometric Line: 1
Fill Material
SPT-N <4 SPT-N <4
SPT-N <4 (2) SPT-N <4 (2)

SPT-N 4-8

C:\Users\Tim\Desktop\Block 13 & 14 & 15 Report\B15\Slope W\R&R\Long Term\Normal\

 FULL R&R
EXTREME TRAIN LIVE LOAD CONDITION
 EDT from Gemas to Johor Bahru Name: Fill Material
Section 5 Model: Mohr-Coulomb
Unit Weight: 20 kN/m³
Cohesion: 5 kPa
Block 15 (CH. 749550) Phi: 30 °
Piezometric Line: 1

Long Term Stability Name: SPT-N <4

Model: Undrained (Phi=0)
Unit Weight: 16 kN/m³
Cohesion: 20 kPa
Full R&R Piezometric Line: 1
E 1.1m Embankment - 3.5m R&R.gsz
Method: Morgenstern-Price Name: SPT-N <4 (2)
Model: Undrained (Phi=0)
Unit Weight: 16 kN/m³
Cohesion: 30 kPa
Piezometric Line: 1

Name: SPT-N 4-8

Model: Mohr-Coulomb
Unit Weight: 17 kN/m³
Cohesion: 1 kPa
72.8 kPa 72.8 kPa
2.564 Phi: 27 °
Piezometric Line: 1
6.6kPa 6.6kPa 6.6kPa

SPT-N <4 Fill Material SPT-N <4

SPT-N <4 (2) SPT-N <4 (2)

SPT-N 4-8

C:\Users\Tim\Desktop\EDT 447\Report\Block 15 Slope Analysis 28.12.2018\R&R\Long Term\Extreme\

 EDT from Gemas to Johor Bahru Name: Fill Material
Section 5 Model: Mohr-Coulomb
Unit Weight: 20 kN/m³
Cohesion: 5 kPa
Block 15 (CH. 747625) Phi: 30 °
Piezometric Line: 1
Long Term Stability Name: SPT-N <4
Model: Undrained (Phi=0)
Unit Weight: 16 kN/m³
Cohesion: 20 kPa
Full R&R Piezometric Line: 1
E 2.4m Embankment - 3m R&R.gsz
Method: Morgenstern-Price Name: SPT-N <4 (2)
Model: Undrained (Phi=0)
Unit Weight: 16 kN/m³
Cohesion: 30 kPa
Piezometric Line: 1

Name: SPT-N 4-8

Model: Mohr-Coulomb
Unit Weight: 17 kN/m³
72.8 kPa 72.8 kPa
2.246 Cohesion: 1 kPa
Phi: 27 °
6.6 kPa 6.6 kPa 6.6 kPa Piezometric Line: 1
SPT-N <4 Fill Material SPT-N <4
SPT-N <4 (2) SPT-N <4 (2)

SPT-N 4-8

C:\Users\Tim\Desktop\EDT 447\Report\Block 15 Slope Analysis 28.12.2018\R&R\Long Term\Extreme\

 Name: Fill Material
EDT from Gemas to Johor Bahru Model: Mohr-Coulomb
Unit Weig ht: 20 kN/m³
Section 5 Cohesion: 5 kPa
Phi: 30 °
Piezometric Line: 1
Block 15 (CH. 748050)
Name: SPT-N <4
Model: Undrained (Phi=0)
Long Term Stability Unit Weig ht: 16 kN/m³
Cohesion: 20 kPa
Piezometric Line: 1
Full R&R
E 4.1m Em bankment - 2.5m R&R.gsz Name: SPT-N <4 (2)
M ethod: M orgenstern-Price Model: Undrained (Phi=0)
Unit Weig ht: 16 kN/m³
Cohesion: 30 kPa
Piezometric Line: 1

Name: SPT-N 4-8

Model: Mohr-Coulomb
72.8 kPa 72.8 kPa 1.938 Unit Weig ht: 17 kN/m³
Cohesion: 1 kPa
6.6 kPa 6.6 kPa 6 .6 kPa Phi: 27 °
Piezometric Line: 1
Fill Material
SPT-N <4 SPT-N <4
SPT-N <4 (2) SPT-N <4 (2)

SPT-N 4-8

C:\Users\Tim\Desktop\EDT 447\Report\Block 15 Slope Analysis 28.12.2018\R &R\Long Term\Extreme\

PARTIAL R&R+S
PARTIAL R&R+S
SHORT TERM
 EDT from Gemas to Johor Bahru
Section 5 Name: Fill Material
Model: Mohr-Coulomb
Unit Weight: 20 kN/m³
Block 15 (CH. 751725) Cohesion: 5 kPa
Phi: 30 °
Piezometric Line: 1
Short Term Stability
Name: SPT-N <4
Model: Undrained (Phi=0)
Unit Weight: 16 kN/m³
Surcharge Preloading with Partial R&R Cohesion: 20 kPa
2.3m Emb - 2m R&R - 3.7 Remaining - 1m Surcharge.gsz Piezometric Line: 1
Method: Morgenstern-Price Name: SPT-N <4 (2)
Model: Undrained (Phi=0)
Unit Weight: 16 kN/m³
Cohesion: 30 kPa
Piezometric Line: 1

Name: SPT-N 4-8

Surcharge 10 kPa Model: Mohr-Coulomb
1.544 Unit Weight: 17 kN/m³
Cohesion: 1 kPa
Phi: 29 °
Piezometric Line: 1
Fill Material
SPT-N <4
SPT-N <4 (2)

SPT-N 4-8

C:\Users\Tim\Desktop\Block 13 & 14 & 15 Report\B15\Slope W\R&R with Surcharge Preloading\Short Term\

 EDT from Gemas to Johor Bahru
Section 5

Block 15 (CH. 747350)

Name: Fill Material
Short Term Stability Model: Mohr-Coulomb
Unit Weight: 20 kN/m³
Cohesion: 5 kPa
Phi: 30 °
Surcharge Preloading with Partial R&R Piezometric Line: 1
2.8m Emb - 1m R&R - 3.4 Remaining - 1m Surcharge.gsz
Method: Morgenstern-Price Name: SPT-N <4
Model: Undrained (Phi=0)
Unit Weight: 16 kN/m³
Cohesion: 20 kPa
Piezometric Line: 1

Name: SPT-N 4-8

Model: Mohr-Coulomb
Surcharge 10 kPa 1.359 Unit Weight: 17 kN/m³
Cohesion: 1 kPa
Phi: 27 °
Piezometric Line: 1
Fill Material

SPT-N <4 SPT-N <4 SPT-N <4

SPT-N 4-8

C:\Users\Tim\Desktop\Block 13 & 14 & 15 Report\B15\Slope W\R&R w ith Surcharge Preloading\Short Term\

 EDT from Gemas to Johor Bahru
Section 5

Block 15 (CH. 747125)

Name: Fill Material
Short Term Stability Model: Mohr-Coulomb
Unit Weight: 20 kN/m³
Cohesion: 5 kPa
Phi: 30 °
Surcharge Preloading with Partial R&R Piezometric Line: 1
3m Emb - 3m R&R - 1.4 Remaining - 1m Surcharge.gsz
Method: Morgenstern-Price Name: SPT-N <4
Model: Undrained (Phi=0)
Unit Weight: 16 kN/m³
Cohesion: 20 kPa
Piezometric Line: 1

Name: SPT-N 4-8

Surcharge 10 kPa Model: Mohr-Coulomb
1.601 Unit Weight: 17 kN/m³
Cohesion: 1 kPa
Phi: 27 °
Piezometric Line: 1
Fill Material
SPT-N <4

SPT-N 4-8

C:\Users\Tim\Desktop\Block 13 & 14 & 15 Report\B15\Slope W\R&R w ith Surcharge Preloading\Short Term\

 EDT from Gemas to Johor Bahru Name: Fill Material
Section 5 Model: Mohr-Coulomb
Unit Weight: 20 kN/m³
Cohesion: 5 kPa
Block 15 (CH. 751725) Phi: 30 °
Piezometric Line: 1
Short Term Stability Name: SPT-N <4
Model: Undrained (Phi=0)
Unit Weight: 16 kN/m³
Cohesion: 20 kPa
Surcharge Preloading with Partial R&R Piezometric Line: 1
2.3m Emb - 2m R&R - 3.7 Remaining - 1m Surcharge.gsz
Method: Morgenstern-Price Name: SPT-N <4 (2)
Model: Undrained (Phi=0)
Unit Weight: 16 kN/m³
Cohesion: 30 kPa
Piezometric Line: 1

Name: SPT-N 4-8

Model: Mohr-Coulomb
Surcharge 10 kPa
Unit Weight: 17 kN/m³
Cohesion: 1 kPa
Phi: 29 °
1.743 Piezometric Line: 1

Fill Material
SPT-N <4
SPT-N <4 (2)

SPT-N 4-8

C:\Users\Tim\Desktop\Block 13 & 14 & 15 Report\B15\Slope W\R&R w ith Surcharge Preloading\Short Term\Bearing\

 EDT from Gemas to Johor Bahru
Section 5

Block 15 (CH. 747350)

Name: Fill Material
Short Term Stability Model: Mohr-Coulomb
Unit Weight: 20 kN/m³
Cohesion: 5 kPa
Phi: 30 °
Surcharge Preloading with Partial R&R Piezometric Line: 1
2.8m Emb - 1m R&R - 3.4 Remaining - 1m Surcharge.gsz
Method: Morgenstern-Price Name: SPT-N <4
Model: Undrained (Phi=0)
Unit Weight: 16 kN/m³
Cohesion: 20 kPa
Piezometric Line: 1

Name: SPT-N 4-8

Model: Mohr-Coulomb
Surcharge 10 kPa Unit Weight: 17 kN/m³
Cohesion: 1 kPa
Phi: 27 °
1.543 Piezometric Line: 1
Fill Material
SPT-N <4

SPT-N 4-8

C:\Users\Tim\Desktop\Block 13 & 14 & 15 Report\B15\Slope W\R&R w ith Surcharge Preloading\Short Term\Bearing\

 EDT from Gemas to Johor Bahru
Section 5

Block 15 (CH. 747125)

Short Term Stability Name: Fill Material

Model: Mohr-Coulomb
Unit Weight: 20 kN/m³
Cohesion: 5 kPa
Surcharge Preloading with Partial R&R Phi: 30 °
3m Emb - 3m R&R - 1.4 Remaining - 1m Surcharge.gsz Piezometric Line: 1
Method: Morgenstern-Price Name: SPT-N <4
Model: Undrained (Phi=0)
Unit Weight: 16 kN/m³
Cohesion: 20 kPa
Piezometric Line: 1

Name: SPT-N 4-8

Model: Mohr-Coulomb
Surcharge 10 kPa Unit Weight: 17 kN/m³
Cohesion: 1 kPa
Phi: 27 °
1.810 Piezometric Line: 1

Fill Material SPT-N <4

SPT-N 4-8

C:\Users\Tim\Desktop\Block 13 & 14 & 15 Report\B15\Slope W\R&R with Surcharge Preloading\Short Term\Bearing\

 PARTIAL R&R+S
LONG TERM
NORMAL TRAIN LIVE LOAD CONDITION
 Name: Fill Material
Model: Mohr-Coulomb
Unit Weight: 20 kN/m³
Cohesion: 5 kPa
Phi: 30 °
Piezometric Line: 1

Name: SPT-N <4

Model: Undrained (Phi=0)
Unit Weight: 16 kN/m³
Cohesion: 20 kPa
Piezometric Line: 1

Name: SPT-N <4 (2)

Model: Undrained (Phi=0)
Unit Weight: 16 kN/m³
Cohesion: 30 kPa
Piezometric Line: 1

Name: SPT-N 4-8

Model: Mohr-Coulomb
Unit Weight: 17 kN/m³
EDT from Gemas to Johor Bahru Cohesion: 1 kPa
Phi: 29 °
Section 5 Piezometric Line: 1

Name: Treated Soil

Block 15 (CH. 751725) Model: Undrained (Phi=0)
Unit Weight: 16 kN/m³
Cohesion: 33 kPa
Long Term Stability (Normal) Piezometric Line: 1

Name: Treated Soil (2)

Model: Undrained (Phi=0)
Surcharge Preloading with Partial R&R Unit Weight: 16 kN/m³
2.3m Emb - 2m R&R - 3.7 Remaining - 1m Surcharge.gsz Cohesion: 24 kPa
Piezometric Line: 1
Method: Morgenstern-Price
Name: Treated Soil (3)
Model: Undrained (Phi=0)
Unit Weight: 16 kN/m³
Cohesion: 43 kPa
Piezometric Line: 1

Name: Treated Soil (4)

Model: Undrained (Phi=0)
57.2 kPa 57.2 kPa
1.898 Unit Weight: 16 kN/m³
Cohesion: 34 kPa
6.6 kPa 6.6 kPa 6.6 kPa Piezometric Line: 1
Fill Material
SPT-N <4 SPT-N <4
Treated Soil (2) Treated Soil Treated Soil (2)
SPT-N <4 (2) Treated Soil (4)
Treated Soil (3)
Treated Soil (4) SPT-N <4 (2)

SPT-N 4-8

C:\Users\Tim\Desktop\Block 13 & 14 & 15 Report\B15\Slope W\R&R with Surcharge Preloading\Long Term\Normal\

 Name: Fill Material
Model: Mohr-Coulomb
Unit Weight: 20 kN/m³
Cohesion: 5 kPa
Phi: 30 °
Piezometric Line: 1
EDT from Gemas to Johor Bahru
Section 5 Name: SPT-N <4
Model: Undrained (Phi=0)
Unit Weight: 16 kN/m³
Block 15 (CH. 747350) Cohesion: 20 kPa
Piezometric Line: 1

LongTerm Stability (Normal) Name: SPT-N 4-8

Model: Mohr-Coulomb
Unit Weight: 17 kN/m³
Cohesion: 1 kPa
Surcharge Preloading with Partial R&R Phi: 27 °
2.8m Emb - 1m R&R - 3.4 Remaining - sample.gsz Piezometric Line: 1
Method: Morgenstern-Price
Name: Treated Soil
Model: Undrained (Phi=0)
Unit Weight: 16 kN/m³
Cohesion: 35 kPa
Piezometric Line: 1

Name: Treated Soil (2)

Model: Undrained (Phi=0)
57.2 kPa 57.2 kPa 1.699 Unit Weight: 16 kN/m³
Cohesion: 25 kPa
6.6 kPa 6.6 kPa 6.6 kPa
Piezometric Line: 1
Fill Material
SPT-N <4 Treated Soil (2)Treated Soil
Treated Soil (2) SPT-N <4

SPT-N 4-8

C:\Users\Tim\Desktop\Block 13 & 14 & 15 Report\B15\Slope W\R&R w ith Surcharge Preloading\Long Term\Normal\

 Name: Fill Material
Model: Mohr-Coulomb
Unit Weight: 20 kN/m³
Cohesion: 5 kPa
Phi: 30 °
Piezometric Line: 1
EDT from Gemas to Johor Bahru
Section 5 Name: SPT-N <4
Model: Undrained (Phi=0)
Unit Weight: 16 kN/m³
Block 15 (CH. 747125) Cohesion: 20 kPa
Piezometric Line: 1
Long Term Stability (Normal) Name: SPT-N 4-8
Model: Mohr-Coulomb
Unit Weight: 17 kN/m³
Cohesion: 1 kPa
Surcharge Preloading with Partial R&R Phi: 27 °
3m Emb - 3m R&R - 1.4 Remaining - 1m Surcharge.gsz Piezometric Line: 1
Method: Morgenstern-Price
Name: Treated Soil
Model: Undrained (Phi=0)
Unit Weight: 16 kN/m³
Cohesion: 35 kPa
Piezometric Line: 1

Name: Treated Soil (2)

57.2 kPa 57.2 kPa 1.725 Model: Undrained (Phi=0)
Unit Weight: 16 kN/m³
Cohesion: 25 kPa
6.6 kPa 6.6 kPa 6.6 kPa
Piezometric Line: 1
Fill Material
SPT-N <4 SPT-N <4
Treated Soil (2)Treated SoilTreated Soil (2)

SPT-N 4-8

C:\Users\Tim\Desktop\Block 13 & 14 & 15 Report\B15\Slope W\R&R w ith Surcharge Preloading\Long Term\Normal\

 Name: Fill Material
Model: Mohr-Coulomb
Unit Weight: 20 kN/m³
Cohesion: 5 kPa
Phi: 30 °
Piezometric Line: 1

Name: SPT-N <4

Model: Undrained (Phi=0)
Unit Weight: 16 kN/m³
Cohesion: 20 kPa
Piezometric Line: 1

Name: SPT-N <4 (2)

Model: Undrained (Phi=0)
Unit Weight: 16 kN/m³
Cohesion: 30 kPa
Piezometric Line: 1

Name: SPT-N 4-8

Model: Mohr-Coulomb
Unit Weight: 17 kN/m³
Cohesion: 1 kPa
Phi: 29 °
EDT from Gemas to Johor Bahru Piezometric Line: 1
Section 5
Name: Treated Soil
Model: Undrained (Phi=0)
Block 15 (CH. 751725) Unit Weight: 16 kN/m³
Cohesion: 33 kPa
Piezometric Line: 1
Long Term Stability (Normal)
Name: Treated Soil (2)
Model: Undrained (Phi=0)
Unit Weight: 16 kN/m³
Surcharge Preloading with Partial R&R Cohesion: 24 kPa
2.3m Emb - 2m R&R - 3.7 Remaining - 1m Surcharge.gsz Piezometric Line: 1
Method: Morgenstern-Price
Name: Treated Soil (3)
Model: Undrained (Phi=0)
Unit Weight: 16 kN/m³
Cohesion: 43 kPa
Piezometric Line: 1

Name: Treated Soil (4)

57.2 kPa 57.2 kPa
Model: Undrained (Phi=0)
Unit Weight: 16 kN/m³
Cohesion: 34 kPa
6.6 kPa 6.6 kPa 6.6 kPa 2.139 Piezometric Line: 1

Fill Material
SPT-N <4 SPT-N <4
Treated Soil (2)Treated SoilTreated Soil (2)
SPT-N <4 (2) Treated Soil (4)
Treated Soil (3) Treated Soil (4) SPT-N <4 (2)

SPT-N 4-8

C:\Users\Tim\Desktop\Block 13 & 14 & 15 Report\B15\Slope W\R&R w ith Surcharge Preloading\Long Term\Normal\Bearing\

 Name: Fill Material
Model: Mohr-Coulomb
Unit Weight: 20 kN/m³
Cohesion: 5 kPa
Phi: 30 °
Piezometric Line: 1
EDT from Gemas to Johor Bahru
Section 5 Name: SPT-N <4
Model: Undrained (Phi=0)
Unit Weight: 16 kN/m³
Block 15 (CH. 747350) Cohesion: 20 kPa
Piezometric Line: 1

LongTerm Stability (Normal) Name: SPT-N 4-8

Model: Mohr-Coulomb
Unit Weight: 17 kN/m³
Cohesion: 1 kPa
Surcharge Preloading with Partial R&R Phi: 27 °
2.8m Emb - 1m R&R - 3.4 Remaining - 1m Surcharge.gsz Piezometric Line: 1
Method: Morgenstern-Price
Name: Treated Soil
Model: Undrained (Phi=0)
Unit Weight: 16 kN/m³
Cohesion: 35 kPa
Piezometric Line: 1

Name: Treated Soil (2)

57.2 kPa 57.2 kPa Model: Undrained (Phi=0)
Unit Weight: 16 kN/m³
Cohesion: 25 kPa
6.6 kPa 6.6 kPa 6.6 kPa
1.912 Piezometric Line: 1
Fill Material
SPT-N <4 Treated Soil (2)Treated SoilTreated Soil (2) SPT-N <4

SPT-N 4-8

C:\Users\Tim\Desktop\Block 13 & 14 & 15 Report\B15\Slope W\R&R w ith Surcharge Preloading\Long Term\Normal\Bearing\

 Name: Fill Material
Model: Mohr-Coulomb
Unit Weight: 20 kN/m³
Cohesion: 5 kPa
Phi: 30 °
Piezometric Line: 1
EDT from Gemas to Johor Bahru
Section 5 Name: SPT-N <4
Model: Undrained (Phi=0)
Unit Weight: 16 kN/m³
Block 15 (CH. 747125) Cohesion: 20 kPa
Piezometric Line: 1
Long Term Stability (Normal) Name: SPT-N 4-8
Model: Mohr-Coulomb
Unit Weight: 17 kN/m³
Cohesion: 1 kPa
Surcharge Preloading with Partial R&R Phi: 27 °
3m Emb - 3m R&R - 1.4 Remaining - 1m Surcharge.gsz Piezometric Line: 1
Method: Morgenstern-Price
Name: Treated Soil
Model: Undrained (Phi=0)
Unit Weight: 16 kN/m³
Cohesion: 35 kPa
Piezometric Line: 1

Name: Treated Soil (2)

57.2 kPa 57.2 kPa Model: Undrained (Phi=0)
Unit Weight: 16 kN/m³
Cohesion: 25 kPa
6.6 kPa 6.6 kPa 6.6 kPa
2.062 Piezometric Line: 1

SPT-N <4 Fill Material SPT-N <4

Treated Soil (2)Treated SoilTreated Soil (2)

SPT-N 4-8

C:\Users\Tim\Desktop\Block 13 & 14 & 15 Report\B15\Slope W\R&R w ith Surcharge Preloading\Long Term\Normal\Bearing\

 PARTIAL R&R+S
LONG TERM
EXTREME TRAIN LIVE LOAD CONDITION
 Name: Fill Material
Model: Mohr-Coulomb
Unit Weight: 20 kN/m³
Cohesion: 5 kPa
Phi: 30 °
Piezometric Line: 1

Name: SPT-N <4

Model: Undrained (Phi=0)
Unit Weight: 16 kN/m³
Cohesion: 20 kPa
Piezometric Line: 1

Name: SPT-N <4 (2)

Model: Undrained (Phi=0)
Unit Weight: 16 kN/m³
Cohesion: 30 kPa
Piezometric Line: 1

Name: SPT-N 4-8

Model: Mohr-Coulomb
Unit Weight: 17 kN/m³
Cohesion: 1 kPa
Phi: 29 °
EDT from Gemas to Johor Bahru Piezometric Line: 1
Section 5
Name: Treated Soil
Model: Undrained (Phi=0)
Block 15 (CH. 751725) Unit Weight: 16 kN/m³
Cohesion: 33 kPa
Piezometric Line: 1
Long Term Stability
Name: Treated Soil (2)
Model: Undrained (Phi=0)
Unit Weight: 16 kN/m³
Surcharge Preloading with Partial R&R Cohesion: 24 kPa
E 2.3m Emb - 2m R&R - 3.7 Remaining - 1m Surcharge.gsz Piezometric Line: 1
Method: Morgenstern-Price
Name: Treated Soil (3)
Model: Undrained (Phi=0)
Unit Weight: 16 kN/m³
Cohesion: 43 kPa
Piezometric Line: 1

Name: Treated Soil (4)

Model: Undrained (Phi=0)
72.8 kPa 72.8 kPa
1.745 Unit Weight: 16 kN/m³
Cohesion: 34 kPa
6.6 kPa 6.6 kPa 6.6 kPa Piezometric Line: 1
Fill Material
SPT-N <4 SPT-N <4
Treated Soil (2)Treated SoilTreated Soil (2)
SPT-N <4 (2) Treated Soil (4)
Treated Soil (3)
Treated Soil (4) SPT-N <4 (2)

SPT-N 4-8

C:\Users\Tim\Desktop\Block 13 & 14 & 15 Report\B15\Slope W\R&R w ith Surcharge Preloading\Long Term\Extreme\

 Name: Fill Material
Model: Mohr-Coulomb
Unit Weight: 20 kN/m³
Cohesion: 5 kPa
EDT from Gemas to Johor Bahru Phi: 30 °
Piezometric Line: 1
Section 5
Name: SPT-N <4
Model: Undrained (Phi=0)
Block 15 (CH. 747350) Unit Weight: 16 kN/m³
Cohesion: 20 kPa
Piezometric Line: 1
Long Term Stability (Extreme)
Name: SPT-N 4-8
Model: Mohr-Coulomb
Unit Weight: 17 kN/m³
Surcharge Preloading with Partial R&R Cohesion: 1 kPa
E 2.8m Emb - 1m R&R - 3.4 Remaining - 1m Surcharge.gsz Phi: 27 °
Piezometric Line: 1
Method: Morgenstern-Price
Name: Treated Soil
Model: Undrained (Phi=0)
Unit Weight: 16 kN/m³
Cohesion: 35 kPa
Piezometric Line: 1

Name: Treated Soil (2)

72.8kPa 72.8kPa 1.576 Model: Undrained (Phi=0)
Unit Weight: 16 kN/m³
Cohesion: 25 kPa
6.6 kPa 6.6 kPa 6.6 kPa
Piezometric Line: 1
Fill Material
SPT-N <4 Treated Soil (2)Treated SoilTreated Soil (2) SPT-N <4

SPT-N 4-8

C:\Users\Tim\Desktop\Block 13 & 14 & 15 Report\B15\Slope W\R&R with Surcharge Preloading\Long Term\Extreme\

 Name: Fill Material
Model: Mohr-Coulomb
Unit Weight: 20 kN/m³
Cohesion: 5 kPa
Phi: 30 °
Piezometric Line: 1
EDT from Gemas to Johor Bahru
Section 5 Name: SPT-N <4
Model: Undrained (Phi=0)
Unit Weight: 16 kN/m³
Block 15 (CH. 747125) Cohesion: 20 kPa
Piezometric Line: 1
Long Term Stability Name: SPT-N 4-8
Model: Mohr-Coulomb
Unit Weight: 17 kN/m³
Cohesion: 1 kPa
Surcharge Preloading with Partial R&R Phi: 27 °
E 3m Emb - 3m R&R - 1.4 Remaining - 1m Surcharge.gsz Piezometric Line: 1
Method: Morgenstern-Price
Name: Treated Soil
Model: Undrained (Phi=0)
Unit Weight: 16 kN/m³
Cohesion: 35 kPa
Piezometric Line: 1

Name: Treated Soil (2)

72.8 kPa 72.8 kPa 1.642 Model: Undrained (Phi=0)
Unit Weight: 16 kN/m³
Cohesion: 25 kPa
6.6 kPa 6.6 kPa 6.6 kPa
Piezometric Line: 1
Fill Material
SPT-N <4 SPT-N <4
Treated Soil (2)Treated SoilTreated Soil (2)

SPT-N 4-8

C:\Users\Tim\Desktop\Block 13 & 14 & 15 Report\B15\Slope W\R&R w ith Surcharge Preloading\Long Term\Extreme\

 Name: Fill Material
Model: Mohr-Coulomb
Unit Weight: 20 kN/m³
Cohesion: 5 kPa
Phi: 30 °
Piezometric Line: 1

Name: SPT-N <4

Model: Undrained (Phi=0)
Unit Weight: 16 kN/m³
Cohesion: 20 kPa
Piezometric Line: 1

Name: SPT-N <4 (2)

Model: Undrained (Phi=0)
Unit Weight: 16 kN/m³
Cohesion: 30 kPa
Piezometric Line: 1

Name: SPT-N 4-8

Model: Mohr-Coulomb
Unit Weight: 17 kN/m³
Cohesion: 1 kPa
Phi: 29 °
EDT from Gemas to Johor Bahru Piezometric Line: 1
Section 5
Name: Treated Soil
Model: Undrained (Phi=0)
Block 15 (CH. 751725) Unit Weight: 16 kN/m³
Cohesion: 33 kPa
Piezometric Line: 1
Long Term Stability (Extreme)
Name: Treated Soil (2)
Model: Undrained (Phi=0)
Unit Weight: 16 kN/m³
Surcharge Preloading with Partial R&R Cohesion: 24 kPa
E 2.3m Emb - 2m R&R - 3.7 Remaining - 1m Surcharge.gsz Piezometric Line: 1
Method: Morgenstern-Price
Name: Treated Soil (3)
Model: Undrained (Phi=0)
Unit Weight: 16 kN/m³
Cohesion: 43 kPa
Piezometric Line: 1

Name: Treated Soil (4)

Model: Undrained (Phi=0)
72.8 kPa 72.8 kPa Unit Weight: 16 kN/m³
Cohesion: 34 kPa
6.6 kPa 6.6 kPa 6.6 kPa 2.013 Piezometric Line: 1

Fill Material
SPT-N <4 SPT-N <4
Treated Soil (2)Treated SoilTreated Soil (2)
SPT-N <4 (2) Treated Soil (4)
Treated Soil (3) Treated Soil (4) SPT-N <4 (2)

SPT-N 4-8

C:\Users\Tim\Desktop\Block 13 & 14 & 15 Report\B15\Slope W\R&R w ith Surcharge Preloading\Long Term\Extreme\Bearing\

 Name: Fill Material
Model: Mohr-Coulomb
Unit Weight: 20 kN/m³
Cohesion: 5 kPa
Phi: 30 °
Piezometric Line: 1
EDT from Gemas to Johor Bahru
Name: SPT-N <4
Section 5 Model: Undrained (Phi=0)
Unit Weight: 16 kN/m³
Cohesion: 20 kPa
Block 15 (CH. 747350)
Piezometric Line: 1

Long Term Stability (Extreme) Name: SPT-N 4-8

Model: Mohr-Coulomb
Unit Weight: 17 kN/m³
Cohesion: 1 kPa
Surcharge Preloading with Partial R&R Phi: 27 °
E 2.8m Em b - 1m R&R - 3.4 Rem aining - 1m Surcharge.gsz Piezometric Line: 1
Method: Morgens tern-Price
Name: Treated Soil
Model: Undrained (Phi=0)
Unit Weight: 16 kN/m³
Cohesion: 35 kPa
Piezometric Line: 1

Name: Treated Soil (2)

72.8kPa 72.8kPa
Model: Undrained (Phi=0)
Unit Weight: 16 kN/m³
Cohesion: 25 kPa
6.6 kPa 6.6 kPa 6.6 kPa
1.820 Piezometric Line: 1
Fill Material
SPT-N <4 Treated Soil (2) Treated Soil Treated Soil (2) SPT-N <4

SPT-N 4-8

C:\Users\Tim\Desktop\Block 13 & 14 & 15 Report\B15\Slope W\R&R with Surcharge Preloading\Long Term\Extreme\Bearing\

 Name: Fill Material
Model: Mohr-Coulomb
Unit Weight: 20 kN/m³
Cohesion: 5 kPa
Phi: 30 °
Piezometric Line: 1
EDT from Gemas to Johor Bahru
Section 5 Name: SPT-N <4
Model: Undrained (Phi=0)
Unit Weight: 16 kN/m³
Block 15 (CH. 747125) Cohesion: 20 kPa
Piezometric Line: 1
Long Term Stability (Extreme) Name: SPT-N 4-8
Model: Mohr-Coulomb
Unit Weight: 17 kN/m³
Cohesion: 1 kPa
Surcharge Preloading with Partial R&R Phi: 27 °
E 3m Emb - 3m R&R - 1.4 Remaining - 1m Surcharge.gsz Piezometric Line: 1
Method: Morgenstern-Price
Name: Treated Soil
Model: Undrained (Phi=0)
Unit Weight: 16 kN/m³
Cohesion: 35 kPa
Piezometric Line: 1

Name: Treated Soil (2)

72.8 kPa 72.8 kPa
Model: Undrained (Phi=0)
Unit Weight: 16 kN/m³
Cohesion: 25 kPa
6.6 kPa 6.6 kPa 6.6 kPa
1.970 Piezometric Line: 1

SPT-N <4 Fill Material SPT-N <4

Treated Soil (2)Treated SoilTreated Soil (2)

SPT-N 4-8

C:\Users\Tim\Desktop\Block 13 & 14 & 15 Report\B15\Slope W\R&R w ith Surcharge Preloading\Long Term\Extreme\Bearing\

SLIDING CHECK
PARTIAL R&R+S
SHORT TERM
 EDT from Gemas to Johor Bahru
Section 5
Name: Fill Material
Block 15 (CH. 751725) Model: Mohr-Coulomb
Unit Weight: 20 kN/m³
Cohesion: 5 kPa
Phi: 30 °
Short Term Stability Piezometric Line: 1

Name: SPT-N <4

Model: Undrained (Phi=0)
Surcharge Preloading with Partial R&R Unit Weight: 16 kN/m³
Cohesion: 20 kPa
2.3m Emb - 2m R&R - 3.7 Remaining - 1m Surcharge.gsz Piezometric Line: 1
Method: Bishop, Ordinary and Janbu
Name: SPT-N <4 (2)
Model: Undrained (Phi=0)
Unit Weight: 16 kN/m³
Cohesion: 30 kPa
Piezometric Line: 1

Name: SPT-N 4-8

Surcharge 10 kPa Model: Mohr-Coulomb
1.40 Unit Weight: 17 kN/m³
Cohesion: 1 kPa
Phi: 29 °
Piezometric Line: 1
Fill Material
SPT-N <4
SPT-N <4 (2)

SPT-N 4-8

C:\Users\Tim\Desktop\Discussion with Mr Lee\Sliding Check\S5\B15 PRR\ST\

 EDT from Gemas to Johor Bahru
Section 5

Block 15 (CH. 747350)

Name: Fill Material
Short Term Stability Model: Mohr-Coulomb
Unit Weight: 20 kN/m³
Cohesion: 5 kPa
Phi: 30 °
Surcharge Preloading with Partial R&R Piezometric Line: 1
2.8m Emb - 1m R&R - 3.4 Remaining - 1m Surcharge.gsz
Method: Bishop, Ordinary and Janbu Name: SPT-N <4
Model: Undrained (Phi=0)
Unit Weight: 16 kN/m³
Cohesion: 20 kPa
Piezometric Line: 1

Name: SPT-N 4-8

Model: Mohr-Coulomb
Surcharge 10 kPa 1.23 Unit Weight: 17 kN/m³
Cohesion: 1 kPa
Phi: 27 °
Piezometric Line: 1
Fill Material

SPT-N <4 SPT-N <4 SPT-N <4

SPT-N 4-8

C:\Users\Tim\Desktop\Discussion w ith Mr Lee\Sliding Check\S5\B15 PRR\ST\

 EDT from Gemas to Johor Bahru
Section 5

Block 15 (CH. 747125)

Short Term Stability Name: Fill Material

Model: Mohr-Coulomb
Unit Weight: 20 kN/m³
Cohesion: 5 kPa
Surcharge Preloading with Partial R&R Phi: 30 °
3m Emb - 3m R&R - 1.4 Remaining - 1m Surcharge.gsz Piezometric Line: 1
Method: Bishop, Ordinary and Janbu Name: SPT-N <4
Model: Undrained (Phi=0)
Unit Weight: 16 kN/m³
Cohesion: 20 kPa
Piezometric Line: 1

Name: SPT-N 4-8

Surcharge 10 kPa
1.41 Model: Mohr-Coulomb
Unit Weight: 17 kN/m³
Cohesion: 1 kPa
Phi: 27 °
Piezometric Line: 1
Fill Material
SPT-N <4

SPT-N 4-8

C:\Users\Tim\Desktop\Discussion with Mr Lee\Sliding Check\S5\B15 PRR\ST\

 SLIDING CHECK

PARTIAL R&R+S
LONG TERM
NORMAL TRAIN LIVE LOAD CONDITION
 Name: Fill Material
Model: Mohr-Coulomb
Unit Weight: 20 kN/m³
Cohesion: 5 kPa
Phi: 30 °
Piezometric Line: 1

Name: SPT-N <4

Model: Undrained (Phi=0)
Unit Weight: 16 kN/m³
Cohesion: 20 kPa
Piezometric Line: 1

Name: SPT-N <4 (2)

Model: Undrained (Phi=0)
Unit Weight: 16 kN/m³
Cohesion: 30 kPa
Piezometric Line: 1

Name: SPT-N 4-8

Model: Mohr-Coulomb
Unit Weight: 17 kN/m³
Cohesion: 1 kPa
Phi: 29 °
EDT from Gemas to Johor Bahru Piezometric Line: 1
Section 5
Name: Treated Soil
Model: Undrained (Phi=0)
Block 15 (CH. 751725) Unit Weight: 16 kN/m³
Cohesion: 33 kPa
Piezometric Line: 1
Long Term Stability (Normal)
Name: Treated Soil (2)
Model: Undrained (Phi=0)
Unit Weight: 16 kN/m³
Surcharge Preloading with Partial R&R Cohesion: 24 kPa
2.3m Emb - 2m R&R - 3.7 Remaining - 1m Surcharge.gsz Piezometric Line: 1
Method: Bishop, Ordinary and Janbu
Name: Treated Soil (3)
Model: Undrained (Phi=0)
Unit Weight: 16 kN/m³
Cohesion: 43 kPa
Piezometric Line: 1

Name: Treated Soil (4)

Model: Undrained (Phi=0)
57.2 kPa 57.2 kPa
1.65 Unit Weight: 16 kN/m³
Cohesion: 34 kPa
6.6 kPa 6.6 kPa 6.6 kPa Piezometric Line: 1
Fill Material
SPT-N <4 SPT-N <4
Treated Soil (2)Treated SoilTreated Soil (2)
SPT-N <4 (2) Treated Soil (4)
Treated Soil (3)
Treated Soil (4) SPT-N <4 (2)

SPT-N 4-8

C:\Users\Tim\Desktop\Discussion w ith Mr Lee\Sliding Check\S5\B15 PRR\NC\

 Name: Fill Material
Model: Mohr-Coulomb
Unit Weight: 20 kN/m³
Cohesion: 5 kPa
Phi: 30 °
Piezometric Line: 1
EDT from Gemas to Johor Bahru
Name: SPT-N <4
Section 5 Model: Undrained (Phi=0)
Unit Weight: 16 kN/m³
Cohesion: 20 kPa
Block 15 (CH. 747350)
Piezometric Line: 1

LongTerm Stability (Normal) Name: SPT-N 4-8

Model: Mohr-Coulomb
Unit Weight: 17 kN/m³
Cohesion: 1 kPa
Surcharge Preloading with Partial R&R Phi: 27 °
2.8m Emb - 1m R&R - 3.4 Rem aining - s am ple.gs z Piezometric Line: 1
Method: Bis hop, Ordinary and Janbu
Name: Treated Soil
Model: Undrained (Phi=0)
Unit Weight: 16 kN/m³
Cohesion: 35 kPa
Piezometric Line: 1

Name: Treated Soil (2)

Model: Undrained (Phi=0)
57.2 kPa 57.2 kPa 1.50 Unit Weight: 16 kN/m³
Cohesion: 25 kPa
6.6 kPa 6.6 kPa 6.6 kPa
Piezometric Line: 1
Fill Material
SPT-N <4 Treated Soil (2) Treated Soil Treated Soil (2) SPT-N <4

SPT-N 4-8

C:\Users\Tim\Desktop\Discussion with Mr Lee\Sliding Check\S5\B15 PRR\NC\

 Name: Fill Material
Model: Mohr-Coulomb
Unit Weight: 20 kN/m³
Cohesion: 5 kPa
EDT from Gemas to Johor Bahru Phi: 30 °
Piezometric Line: 1
Section 5
Name: SPT-N <4
Model: Undrained (Phi=0)
Block 15 (CH. 747125) Unit Weight: 16 kN/m³
Cohesion: 20 kPa
Piezometric Line: 1
Long Term Stability (Normal)
Name: SPT-N 4-8
Model: Mohr-Coulomb
Unit Weight: 17 kN/m³
Surcharge Preloading with Partial R&R Cohesion: 1 kPa
3m Emb - 3m R&R - 1.4 Remaining - 1m Surcharge.gsz Phi: 27 °
Piezometric Line: 1
Method: Bishop, Ordinary and Janbu
Name: Treated Soil
Model: Undrained (Phi=0)
Unit Weight: 16 kN/m³
Cohesion: 35 kPa
Piezometric Line: 1

Name: Treated Soil (2)

57.2 kPa 57.2 kPa 1.60 Model: Undrained (Phi=0)
Unit Weight: 16 kN/m³
Cohesion: 25 kPa
6.6 kPa 6.6 kPa 6.6 kPa
Piezometric Line: 1
Fill Material
SPT-N <4 SPT-N <4
Treated Soil (2) Treated SoilTreated Soil (2)

SPT-N 4-8

C:\Users\Tim\Desktop\Discussion with Mr Lee\Sliding Check\S5\B15 PRR\NC\

STONE COLUMN
EXISTING CONDITION
 EDT from Gemas to Johor Bahru
Section 5

Block 15 (CH. 750850)

Nam e: Fill Material
Model: Mohr-Coulom b
Long Term Stability Unit Weight: 20 kN/m ³
Cohes ion: 5 kPa
Phi: 30 °
Piezom etric Line: 1
Stone Column (Without Treatment)
4.9m Embankment - 10m Soft Layer - 1m Surcharge.gsz Nam e: Layer 1
Method: Morgenstern-Price Model: Undrained (Phi=0)
Unit Weight: 16 kN/m ³
Cohes ion: 25 kPa
Piezom etric Line: 1

Nam e: SPT-N 4-8

57.2 kPa 57.2 kPa 1.105 Model: Mohr-Coulom b
Unit Weight: 17 kN/m ³
6.6 kPa 6.6 kPa 6.6 kPa
Cohes ion: 1 kPa
Phi: 29 °
Fill Material Piezom etric Line: 1

Layer 1 Layer 1 Layer 1

SPT-N 4-8

C:\Users \Tim \Desktop\Block 13 & 14 & 15 Report\B15\Slope W\Stone Colum n\Without Treatm ent\
 Name: Fill Material
EDT from Gemas to Johor Bahru Model: Mohr-Coulomb
Section 5 Unit Weight: 20 kN/m³
Cohesion: 5 kPa
Phi: 30 °
Block 15 (CH. 747425) Piezometric Line: 1

Name: Layer 1
Long Term Stability Model: Undrained (Phi=0)
Unit Weight: 16 kN/m³
Cohesion: 20 kPa
Piezometric Line: 1
Stone Column (Without Treatment)
7.4m Embankment - 7.5m Soft Layer - 1m Surcharge.gsz Name: Layer 2
Method: Morgenstern-Price Model: Mohr-Coulomb
Unit Weight: 16 kN/m³
Cohesion: 1 kPa
Phi: 27 °
Piezometric Line: 1

57.2 kPa 57.2 kPa

0.745 Name: SPT-N 4-8
Model: Mohr-Coulomb
6.6 kPa 6.6 kPa 6.6 kPa Unit Weight: 17 kN/m³
Cohesion: 1 kPa
Fill Material Phi: 27 °
Piezometric Line: 1

Layer 1 Layer 1 Layer 1

Layer 2 Layer 2 Layer 2

SPT-N 4-8

C:\Users\Tim\Desktop\Block 13 & 14 & 15 Report\B15\Slope W\Stone Column\Without Treatment\

 STONE COLUMN
LONG TERM
(TREATED CONDITION)
NORMAL TRAIN LIVE LOAD CONDITION
 Nam e: Fill Material
Model: Mohr-Coulom b
EDT from Gemas to Johor Bahru Unit Weight: 20 kN/m ³
Cohes ion: 5 kPa
Section 5 Phi: 30 °
Piezom etric Line: 1
Block 15 (CH. 750850)
Nam e: Layer 1
Model: Undrained (Phi=0)
Long Term Stability (Normal) Unit Weight: 16 kN/m ³
Cohes ion: 25 kPa
Piezom etric Line: 1
Stone Column
Nam e: SPT-N 4-8
4.9m Embankment - 10m Soft Layer - 1m Surcharge.gsz Model: Mohr-Coulom b
Method: Morgenstern-Price Unit Weight: 17 kN/m ³
Cohes ion: 1 kPa
Phi: 29 °
Piezom etric Line: 1

Nam e: Treated Soil

57.2 kPa 57.2 kPa 2.182 Model: Mohr-Coulom b
Unit Weight: 17 kN/m ³
6.6 kPa 6.6 kPa 6.6 kPa
Cohes ion: 8.7 kPa
Phi: 30.4 °
Fill Material Piezom etric Line: 1

Layer 1 Treated Soil Layer 1

SPT-N 4-8

C:\Users \Tim \Desktop\Block 13 & 14 & 15 Report\B15\Slope W\Stone Colum n\With Treatm ent\Norm al\
 Name: Fill Material
Model: Mohr-Coulomb
Unit Weight: 20 kN/m³
Cohesion: 5 kPa
Phi: 30 °
Piezometric Line: 1

Name: Layer 1
Model: Undrained (Phi=0)
Unit Weight: 16 kN/m³
Cohesion: 20 kPa
Piezometric Line: 1

Name: Layer 2
Model: Mohr-Coulomb
EDT from Gemas to Johor Bahru Unit Weight: 16 kN/m³
Section 5 Cohesion: 1 kPa
Phi: 27 °
Piezometric Line: 1
Block 15 (CH. 747425)
Name: SPT-N 4-8
Model: Mohr-Coulomb
Long Term Stability (Normal) Unit Weight: 17 kN/m³
Cohesion: 1 kPa
Phi: 27 °
Piezometric Line: 1
Stone Column
7.4m Embankment - 7.5m Soft Layer - 1m Surcharge.gsz Name: Treated Soil
Method: Morgenstern-Price Model: Mohr-Coulomb
Unit Weight: 17 kN/m³
Cohesion: 8.9 kPa
Phi: 26.6 °
Piezometric Line: 1

57.2 kPa 57.2 kPa

1.818 Name: Treated Soil (2)
Model: Mohr-Coulomb
6.6 kPa 6.6 kPa 6.6 kPa Unit Weight: 17 kN/m³
Cohesion: 0 kPa
Fill Material Phi: 36 °
Piezometric Line: 1

Layer 1 Treated Soil Layer 1

Layer 2 Treated Soil (2) Layer 2

SPT-N 4-8

C:\Users\Tim\Desktop\Block 13 & 14 & 15 Report\B15\Slope W\Stone Column\With Treatment\Normal\

 STONE COLUMN
LONG TERM
(TREATED CONDITION)
EXTREME TRAIN LIVE LOAD CONDITION
 EDT from Gemas to Johor Bahru
Section 5 Name: Fill Material
Model: Mohr-Coulomb
Unit Weight: 20 kN/m³
Block 15 (CH. 750850) Cohesion: 5 kPa
Phi: 30 °
Piezometric Line: 1
Long Term Stability (Extreme) Name: Layer 1
Model: Undrained (Phi=0)
Unit Weight: 16 kN/m³
Cohesion: 25 kPa
Stone Column Piezometric Line: 1
E 4.9m Embankment - 10m Soft Layer - 1m Surcharge.gsz
Method: Morgenstern-Price Name: SPT-N 4-8
Model: Mohr-Coulomb
Unit Weight: 17 kN/m³
Cohesion: 1 kPa
Phi: 29 °
Piezometric Line: 1

Name: Treated Soil

72.8 kPa 72.8 kPa 2.106 Model: Mohr-Coulomb
Unit Weight: 17 kN/m³
6.6 kPa 6.6 kPa 6.6 kPa Cohesion: 8.7 kPa
Phi: 30.4 °
Fill Material Piezometric Line: 1

Layer 1 Treated Soil Layer 1

SPT-N 4-8

C:\Users\Tim\Desktop\Block 13 & 14 & 15 Report\B15\Slope W\Stone Column\With Treatment\Extreme\

 Name: Fill Material
Model: Mohr-Coulomb
Unit Weight: 20 kN/m³
Cohesion: 5 kPa
Phi: 30 °
Piezometric Line: 1

Name: Layer 1
Model: Undrained (Phi=0)
Unit Weight: 16 kN/m³
Cohesion: 20 kPa
Piezometric Line: 1

Name: Layer 2
Model: Mohr-Coulomb
EDT from Gemas to Johor Bahru Unit Weight: 16 kN/m³
Section 5 Cohesion: 1 kPa
Phi: 27 °
Piezometric Line: 1
Block 15 (CH. 747425)
Name: SPT-N 4-8
Model: Mohr-Coulomb
Long Term Stability (Extreme) Unit Weight: 17 kN/m³
Cohesion: 1 kPa
Phi: 27 °
Piezometric Line: 1
Stone Column
E 7.4m Embankment - 7.5m Soft Layer - 1m Surcharge.gsz Name: Treated Soil
Method: Morgenstern-Price Model: Mohr-Coulomb
Unit Weight: 17 kN/m³
Cohesion: 8.9 kPa
Phi: 26.6 °
Piezometric Line: 1

72.8 kPa 72.8 kPa

1.786 Name: Treated Soil (2)
Model: Mohr-Coulomb
6.6 kPa 6.6 kPa 6.6 kPa Unit Weight: 17 kN/m³
Cohesion: 0 kPa
Fill Material Phi: 36 °
Piezometric Line: 1

Layer 1 Treated Soil Layer 1

Layer 2 Treated Soil (2) Layer 2

SPT-N 4-8

C:\Users\Tim\Desktop\Block 13 & 14 & 15 Report\B15\Slope W\Stone Column\With Treatment\Extreme\

 APPENDIX E
SETTLEMENT CALCULATION
 CR = 0.15
RR = 0.015
3
Emb. U/Wt = 20.0 kN/m
3
Surcharge U/Wt = 20.0 kN/m
3
Softlayer U/Wt = 16.0 kN/m
GWT = 1.0 m b.g.l.
Imposed Load = 12.5 kPa
Initial Stage Construction Stage (Consolidation Stage) Service Stage Residual Settlement during Service

Remaining Soft Initial Effective Add. Stress Inc. Total Settlement Settlement at Eff. Stress at end Scrap off Unloading Stress Eff Stress after Stress Increase
Surcharge Embankment + Soft Layer R&R Thickness Total stress, Rest Period U at end of Eff. Stress at 1= Emb Ps > Pf Total residual settlement
Emb Height (m) Layer Thickness Overburden during surcharge under surcharge end of rest of Surcharge thickness after due to scrap off, Scrap Off ,Pr after Unloading Virgin settlement (mm)
(m) Surcharge (m) Thickness (m) (m) σT (kPa) (months) rest period (%) Service, Ps (kPa) 2= Emb Ps < Pf (mm)
(m) stress, σ'vo (kPA) period, ∆σ (kPa) (mm) period (mm) Period, Pf (kPa) surcharge (mm) ∆σ (kPa) (kPa) (kPa)

2.8 0.6 3.4 4.5 1.0 3.5 26.8 72.8 99.6 295.8 3.5 275.0 93% 94.5 365.0 6.8 87.7 104.8 17.1 1.0 23.6 23.6

2.3 0.6 2.9 5.7 2.0 3.7 33.6 66.8 100.4 273.2 3.5 246.0 90% 93.8 394.0 7.1 86.7 105.1 18.4 1.0 25.0 25

3.0 0.6 3.6 4.4 3.0 1.4 32.7 84.0 116.7 115.9 1.0 114.0 98% 115.3 486.0 9.6 105.8 119.5 13.7 1.0 3.2 3.2
Electricfied Double Track from Senai to Kempas

Settlement Analysis (Surcharge Stage)

R&R with Surcharge

ESTIMATION OF PRIMARY CONSOLIDATION SETTLEMENTS

DESIGN EMBANKMENT HEIGHT, HD = 3.00 m (2.8m Fill + 1.0m R&R)

SURCHARGE HEIGHT, Hs = 0.6 m
TOTAL FILL HEIGHT = 3.60 m Half Top width of emb(B1) = 7.5 m
3
FILL UNIT WEIGHT = 20 kN/m Side slope Angle 1(V) : 2 (H)
AFTER SUBMERGENCE CORRECTION, qo = 69.10 kPa Width of sloped emb (B2) = 7.2 m

WATER TABLE DEPTH (ABOVE SEABED LEVEL)= 0m Superimposed Dead Load (SDL) = 0 kPa (On top of Emb.)
Extent of SDL on top of embankment = 9m
TOTAL SETTLEMENT 295.8 mm 0.0
(By varying Settlement)
DEPTH INTERVAL = 1m

TOP BOTTOM THICKNESS BULK AVG. DEPTH INITIAL EFF. 1 2 STRESS INCREASE STRESS INCREASE TOTAL STRESS  o'+ T OCR PRECONSOL CR RR TOTAL
DEPTH DEPTH DENSITY MID-LAYER OVER. PRESSURE radians radians DUE TO EMB  DUE TO SDL  INCREASE T PRESSURE RR*H*log(( 0'+)/ 0') RR*H*log(( pc)/ 0') CR*H*log(( o'+)/ pc) SETTLEMENT
(m) (m) (m) (kN/m3) (m)  o' (kPa) (kPa) = 1 +  2 (kPa) (kPa)  pc (kPa) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm)

0 0.5 0.5 16.0 0.25 17.55 0.016 1.537 69.10 0.00 69.10 86.65 1.00 17.55 0.15 0.015 0.0 0.0 52.0 52.0
0.5 1.0 0.5 16.0 0.75 20.64 0.049 1.471 69.09 0.00 69.09 89.73 1.00 20.64 0.15 0.015 0.0 0.0 47.9 47.9
1 1.5 0.5 16.0 1.25 23.74 0.080 1.406 69.05 0.00 69.05 92.78 1.00 23.74 0.15 0.015 0.0 0.0 44.4 44.4
1.5 2.0 0.5 16.0 1.75 26.83 0.111 1.342 68.96 0.00 68.96 95.79 1.00 26.83 0.15 0.015 0.0 0.0 41.5 41.5
2 2.5 0.5 16.0 2.25 29.93 0.140 1.279 68.81 0.00 68.81 98.74 1.00 29.93 0.15 0.015 0.0 0.0 38.9 38.9
2.5 3.0 0.5 16.0 2.75 33.02 0.167 1.219 68.59 0.00 68.59 101.62 1.00 33.02 0.15 0.015 0.0 0.0 36.6 36.6
3 3.5 0.5 16.0 3.25 36.12 0.191 1.162 68.29 0.00 68.29 104.41 1.00 36.12 0.15 0.015 0.0 0.0 34.6 34.6

295.8

Page 1 of 3
TIME-RATE OF SETTLEMENT
Electricfied Double Track from Senai to Kempas
Settlement Analysis (Surcharge Stage)

No treatment Case
Consolidation Settlement 296 mm
Thickness of consolidating layer 3.4 m
Drainage Path 2 way
Coefficient of Consolidation 10.00 m2/yr

Time Interval = 0.0 years

Time (years) Time (months) Tv Uv Settlement (mm)

0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 0

0.0 0.5 0.14 0.43 127
0.1 1.0 0.29 0.60 177
0.1 1.5 0.43 0.72 213
0.2 2.0 0.58 0.80 238
0.2 2.5 0.72 0.86 255
0.3 3.0 0.87 0.90 267
0.3 3.5 1.01 0.93 275
0.3 4.0 1.15 0.95 281
0.4 4.5 1.30 0.96 284
0.4 5.0 1.44 0.97 287
0.5 5.5 1.59 0.98 289
0.5 6.0 1.73 0.98 290
0.5 6.5 1.87 0.98 291
0.6 7.0 2.02 0.99 292
0.6 7.5 2.16 0.99 292
0.7 8.0 2.31 0.99 293
0.7 8.5 2.45 0.99 293
0.8 9.0 2.60 0.99 294
0.8 9.5 2.74 0.99 294
0.8 10.0 2.88 0.99 294
0.9 10.5 3.03 0.99 294
0.9 11.0 3.17 0.99 294
1.0 11.5 3.32 1.00 294
1.0 12.0 3.46 1.00 294
1.0 12.5 3.60 1.00 295
1.1 13.0 3.75 1.00 295
1.1 13.5 3.89 1.00 295
1.2 14.0 4.04 1.00 295
1.2 14.5 4.18 1.00 295
1.3 15.0 4.33 1.00 295
1.3 15.5 4.47 1.00 295
1.3 16.0 4.61 1.00 295
1.4 16.5 4.76 1.00 295
1.4 17.0 4.90 1.00 295
1.5 17.5 5.05 1.00 295
1.5 18.0 5.19 1.00 295
1.5 18.5 5.33 1.00 295
1.6 19.0 5.48 1.00 295
1.6 19.5 5.62 1.00 295
1.7 20.0 5.77 1.00 295
1.7 20.5 5.91 1.00 295
1.8 21.0 6.06 1.00 295
1.8 21.5 6.20 1.00 295
1.8 22.0 6.34 1.00 295
1.9 22.5 6.49 1.00 295
1.9 23.0 6.63 1.00 295
2.0 23.5 6.78 1.00 295
2.0 24.0 6.92 1.00 295
2.0 24.5 7.06 1.00 295
2.1 25.0 7.21 1.00 295
2.1 25.5 7.35 1.00 295
2.2 26.0 7.50 1.00 295
2.2 26.5 7.64 1.00 295
2.3 27.0 7.79 1.00 295
2.3 27.5 7.93 1.00 295
2.3 28.0 8.07 1.00 295
2.4 28.5 8.22 1.00 295
2.4 29.0 8.36 1.00 295
2.5 29.5 8.51 1.00 295
2.5 30.0 8.65 1.00 295
2.5 30.5 8.79 1.00 295
2.6 31.0 8.94 1.00 295
2.6 31.5 9.08 1.00 295
2.7 32.0 9.23 1.00 295
2.7 32.5 9.37 1.00 295
2.8 33.0 9.52 1.00 295
2.8 33.5 9.66 1.00 295

Page 2 of 3
 Time Vs Settlement

TIME (Months)
0.00 2.00 4.00 6.00 8.00 10.00
0

50

100
SETTLEMENT (mm)

150

200

250

300

350

Page 3 of 3
Electricfied Double Track from Senai to Kempas

Settlement Analysis (Surcharge Stage)

R&R with Surcharge

ESTIMATION OF PRIMARY CONSOLIDATION SETTLEMENTS

DESIGN EMBANKMENT HEIGHT, HD = 3.00 m (2.8m Fill + 1.0m R&R)

SURCHARGE HEIGHT, Hs = 0.6 m
TOTAL FILL HEIGHT = 3.60 m Half Top width of emb(B1) = 7.5 m
3
FILL UNIT WEIGHT = 20 kN/m Side slope Angle 1(V) : 2 (H)
AFTER SUBMERGENCE CORRECTION, qo = 69.32 kPa Width of sloped emb (B2) = 7.2 m

WATER TABLE DEPTH (ABOVE SEABED LEVEL)= 0m Superimposed Dead Load (SDL) = 0 kPa (On top of Emb.)
Extent of SDL on top of embankment = 9m
TOTAL SETTLEMENT 273.2 mm 0.0
(By varying Settlement)
DEPTH INTERVAL = 1m

TOP BOTTOM THICKNESS BULK AVG. DEPTH INITIAL EFF. 1 2 STRESS INCREASE STRESS INCREASE TOTAL STRESS  o'+ T OCR PRECONSOL CR RR TOTAL
DEPTH DEPTH DENSITY MID-LAYER OVER. PRESSURE radians radians DUE TO EMB  DUE TO SDL  INCREASE T PRESSURE RR*H*log(( 0'+)/ 0') RR*H*log(( pc)/ 0') CR*H*log(( o'+)/ pc) SETTLEMENT
(m) (m) (m) (kN/m3) (m)  o' (kPa) (kPa) = 1 +  2 (kPa) (kPa)  pc (kPa) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm)

0 0.5 0.5 16.0 0.25 23.74 0.016 1.537 69.32 0.00 69.32 93.06 1.00 23.74 0.15 0.015 0.0 0.0 44.5 44.5
0.5 1.0 0.5 16.0 0.75 26.83 0.049 1.471 69.31 0.00 69.31 96.14 1.00 26.83 0.15 0.015 0.0 0.0 41.6 41.6
1 1.5 0.5 16.0 1.25 29.93 0.080 1.406 69.27 0.00 69.27 99.20 1.00 29.93 0.15 0.015 0.0 0.0 39.0 39.0
1.5 2.0 0.5 16.0 1.75 33.02 0.111 1.342 69.18 0.00 69.18 102.20 1.00 33.02 0.15 0.015 0.0 0.0 36.8 36.8
2 2.5 0.5 16.0 2.25 36.12 0.140 1.279 69.03 0.00 69.03 105.15 1.00 36.12 0.15 0.015 0.0 0.0 34.8 34.8
2.5 3.0 0.5 16.0 2.75 39.21 0.167 1.219 68.81 0.00 68.81 108.03 1.00 39.21 0.15 0.015 0.0 0.0 33.0 33.0
3 3.7 0.7 16.0 3.35 42.93 0.196 1.151 68.44 0.00 68.44 111.37 1.00 42.93 0.15 0.015 0.0 0.0 43.5 43.5

273.2

Page 1 of 3
TIME-RATE OF SETTLEMENT
Electricfied Double Track from Senai to Kempas
Settlement Analysis (Surcharge Stage)

No treatment Case
Consolidation Settlement 273 mm
Thickness of consolidating layer 3.7 m
Drainage Path 2 way
Coefficient of Consolidation 10.00 m2/yr

Time Interval = 0.0 years

Time (years) Time (months) Tv Uv Settlement (mm)

0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 0

0.0 0.5 0.12 0.39 107
0.1 1.0 0.24 0.55 151
0.1 1.5 0.37 0.67 183
0.2 2.0 0.49 0.76 206
0.2 2.5 0.61 0.82 224
0.3 3.0 0.73 0.87 237
0.3 3.5 0.85 0.90 246
0.3 4.0 0.97 0.92 253
0.4 4.5 1.10 0.94 257
0.4 5.0 1.22 0.95 261
0.5 5.5 1.34 0.96 263
0.5 6.0 1.46 0.97 265
0.5 6.5 1.58 0.98 267
0.6 7.0 1.70 0.98 268
0.6 7.5 1.83 0.98 269
0.7 8.0 1.95 0.99 269
0.7 8.5 2.07 0.99 270
0.8 9.0 2.19 0.99 270
0.8 9.5 2.31 0.99 271
0.8 10.0 2.43 0.99 271
0.9 10.5 2.56 0.99 271
0.9 11.0 2.68 0.99 271
1.0 11.5 2.80 0.99 271
1.0 12.0 2.92 0.99 272
1.0 12.5 3.04 0.99 272
1.1 13.0 3.17 0.99 272
1.1 13.5 3.29 1.00 272
1.2 14.0 3.41 1.00 272
1.2 14.5 3.53 1.00 272
1.3 15.0 3.65 1.00 272
1.3 15.5 3.77 1.00 272
1.3 16.0 3.90 1.00 272
1.4 16.5 4.02 1.00 272
1.4 17.0 4.14 1.00 272
1.5 17.5 4.26 1.00 272
1.5 18.0 4.38 1.00 272
1.5 18.5 4.50 1.00 272
1.6 19.0 4.63 1.00 272
1.6 19.5 4.75 1.00 272
1.7 20.0 4.87 1.00 272
1.7 20.5 4.99 1.00 272
1.8 21.0 5.11 1.00 272
1.8 21.5 5.23 1.00 272
1.8 22.0 5.36 1.00 272
1.9 22.5 5.48 1.00 272
1.9 23.0 5.60 1.00 272
2.0 23.5 5.72 1.00 272
2.0 24.0 5.84 1.00 272
2.0 24.5 5.97 1.00 272
2.1 25.0 6.09 1.00 272
2.1 25.5 6.21 1.00 272
2.2 26.0 6.33 1.00 272
2.2 26.5 6.45 1.00 272
2.3 27.0 6.57 1.00 272
2.3 27.5 6.70 1.00 272
2.3 28.0 6.82 1.00 272
2.4 28.5 6.94 1.00 272
2.4 29.0 7.06 1.00 272
2.5 29.5 7.18 1.00 272
2.5 30.0 7.30 1.00 272
2.5 30.5 7.43 1.00 272
2.6 31.0 7.55 1.00 272
2.6 31.5 7.67 1.00 272
2.7 32.0 7.79 1.00 272
2.7 32.5 7.91 1.00 272
2.8 33.0 8.04 1.00 272
2.8 33.5 8.16 1.00 272

Page 2 of 3
 Time Vs Settlement

TIME (Months)
0.00 2.00 4.00 6.00 8.00 10.00
0

50

100
SETTLEMENT (mm)

150

200

250

300

Page 3 of 3
Electricfied Double Track from Senai to Kempas

Settlement Analysis (Surcharge Stage)

R&R with Surcharge

ESTIMATION OF PRIMARY CONSOLIDATION SETTLEMENTS

DESIGN EMBANKMENT HEIGHT, HD = 3.60 m (3.0m Fill + 3.0m R&R)

SURCHARGE HEIGHT, Hs = 0.6 m
TOTAL FILL HEIGHT = 4.24 m Half Top width of emb(B1) = 7.5 m
3
FILL UNIT WEIGHT = 20 kN/m Side slope Angle 1(V) : 2 (H)
AFTER SUBMERGENCE CORRECTION, qo = 83.66 kPa Width of sloped emb (B2) = 8.48 m

WATER TABLE DEPTH (ABOVE SEABED LEVEL)= 0m Superimposed Dead Load (SDL) = 0 kPa (On top of Emb.)
Extent of SDL on top of embankment = 9m
TOTAL SETTLEMENT 115.9 mm 0.0
(By varying Settlement)
DEPTH INTERVAL = 1m

TOP BOTTOM THICKNESS BULK AVG. DEPTH INITIAL EFF. 1 2 STRESS INCREASE STRESS INCREASE TOTAL STRESS  o'+ T OCR PRECONSOL CR RR TOTAL
DEPTH DEPTH DENSITY MID-LAYER OVER. PRESSURE radians radians DUE TO EMB  DUE TO SDL  INCREASE T PRESSURE RR*H*log(( 0'+)/ 0') RR*H*log(( pc)/ 0') CR*H*log(( o'+)/ pc) SETTLEMENT
(m) (m) (m) (kN/m3) (m)  o' (kPa) (kPa) = 1 +  2 (kPa) (kPa)  pc (kPa) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm)

0 0.5 0.5 16.0 0.25 29.93 0.018 1.537 83.66 0.00 83.66 113.59 1.00 29.93 0.15 0.015 0.0 0.0 43.4 43.4
0.5 1.0 0.5 16.0 0.75 33.02 0.053 1.471 83.65 0.00 83.65 116.67 1.00 33.02 0.15 0.015 0.0 0.0 41.1 41.1
1 1.4 0.4 16.0 1.2 35.81 0.084 1.412 83.61 0.00 83.61 119.42 1.00 35.81 0.15 0.015 0.0 0.0 31.4 31.4

115.9

Page 1 of 3
TIME-RATE OF SETTLEMENT
Electricfied Double Track from Senai to Kempas
Settlement Analysis (Surcharge Stage)

No treatment Case
Consolidation Settlement 116 mm
Thickness of consolidating layer 1.4 m
Drainage Path 2 way
Coefficient of Consolidation 10.00 m2/yr

Time Interval = 0.0 years

Time (years) Time (months) Tv Uv Settlement (mm)

0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 0

0.0 0.5 0.85 0.90 104
0.1 1.0 1.70 0.98 114
0.1 1.5 2.55 0.99 115
0.2 2.0 3.40 1.00 115
0.2 2.5 4.25 1.00 116
0.3 3.0 5.10 1.00 116
0.3 3.5 5.95 1.00 116
0.3 4.0 6.80 1.00 116
0.4 4.5 7.65 1.00 116
0.4 5.0 8.50 1.00 116
0.5 5.5 9.35 1.00 116
0.5 6.0 10.20 1.00 116
0.5 6.5 11.05 1.00 116
0.6 7.0 11.90 1.00 116
0.6 7.5 12.76 1.00 116
0.7 8.0 13.61 1.00 116
0.7 8.5 14.46 1.00 116
0.8 9.0 15.31 1.00 116
0.8 9.5 16.16 1.00 116
0.8 10.0 17.01 1.00 116
0.9 10.5 17.86 1.00 116
0.9 11.0 18.71 1.00 116
1.0 11.5 19.56 1.00 115
1.0 12.0 20.41 1.00 115
1.0 12.5 21.26 1.00 115
1.1 13.0 22.11 1.00 115
1.1 13.5 22.96 1.00 115
1.2 14.0 23.81 1.00 115
1.2 14.5 24.66 1.00 115
1.3 15.0 25.51 1.00 115
1.3 15.5 26.36 1.00 115
1.3 16.0 27.21 1.00 115
1.4 16.5 28.06 1.00 115
1.4 17.0 28.91 1.00 115
1.5 17.5 29.76 1.00 115
1.5 18.0 30.61 1.00 115
1.5 18.5 31.46 1.00 115
1.6 19.0 32.31 1.00 115
1.6 19.5 33.16 1.00 115
1.7 20.0 34.01 1.00 115
1.7 20.5 34.86 1.00 115
1.8 21.0 35.71 1.00 115
1.8 21.5 36.56 1.00 115
1.8 22.0 37.41 1.00 115
1.9 22.5 38.27 1.00 115
1.9 23.0 39.12 1.00 115
2.0 23.5 39.97 1.00 115
2.0 24.0 40.82 1.00 115
2.0 24.5 41.67 1.00 115
2.1 25.0 42.52 1.00 115
2.1 25.5 43.37 1.00 115
2.2 26.0 44.22 1.00 115
2.2 26.5 45.07 1.00 115
2.3 27.0 45.92 1.00 115
2.3 27.5 46.77 1.00 115
2.3 28.0 47.62 1.00 115
2.4 28.5 48.47 1.00 115
2.4 29.0 49.32 1.00 115
2.5 29.5 50.17 1.00 115
2.5 30.0 51.02 1.00 115
2.5 30.5 51.87 0.99 115
2.6 31.0 52.72 0.99 115
2.6 31.5 53.57 0.99 115
2.7 32.0 54.42 0.99 115
2.7 32.5 55.27 0.99 115
2.8 33.0 56.12 0.99 115
2.8 33.5 56.97 0.99 115

Page 2 of 3
 Time Vs Settlement

TIME (Months)
0.00 2.00 4.00 6.00 8.00 10.00
0

20

40
SETTLEMENT (mm)

60

80

100

120

140

Page 3 of 3
 APPENDIX F
STONE COLUMN DESIGN
GCU Consultants Sdn Bhd Stone Column

EDT J447

DESIGN OF STONE COLUMN GROUND TREATMENT WORKS

LOCATION : CH 750750-751100

SERVICE STAGE- CONFORMING

EMBANKMENT GEOMETRY

HALF TOP WIDTH (B) = 7.5 m DIAMETER(D) = 1 m

EMBANKMENT SLOPE (1:?) = 2 COLUMN SPACING (S) = 1.7 m
DESIGN EMBANKMENT HEIGHT(H) = 5 m COLUMN DEPTH = 10 m
EMBANKMENT BASE WIDTH (W) = 17.5 m UNIT WEIGHT = 20 kN/m3
SURCHARGE HEIGHT = 0.6 m CONSTRAINED MODULUS = 120 MPa
ADD. FILL THK DUE TO SETTLEMENT = m FRICTION ANGLE = 42 degrees
POISSON RATIO = 0.333
LOADINGS GROUND WATER TABLE = 0 m
TRIBUTARY AREA FOR SINGLE COLUMN = 2.89
FILL UNIT WEIGHT = 20 kN/m3 AREA REPLACEMENT RATIO (Ac/A) = 0.2718
FILL LOAD = 112 kPa ACTIVE EARTH PRESSURE COEFF.(Kac) = 0.198
SUPERIMPOSED DEAD LOAD (SDL) = 12.5 kPa (SDL from Rails, Sleepers & Ballast) Ko EARTH PRESSURE COEFF. (Koc) = 0.331
SUPERIMPOSED LIVE LOAD (SDL) = 35 kPa (LL from trains) BASIC IMPROVEMENT FACTOR (n0) = 2.95
EXTENT/WIDTH OF SDL = 15 m (Acting at Top Sub-ballast Formation)
TOTAL DESIGN LOAD = 159.5 kPa

SUBSOIL STRATA & PROPERTIES

SOIL BOTTOM THK TYPE CONSTRAINED UNIT Su PHI

LAYER LEVEL MODULUS WEIGHT
(m) (m) (MPa) kN/m3 kPa degree

1 10 10 CLAY 2.50 16 25 0
2

TREATED PORTION

DRAINAGE LENGTH (VERTICAL)= 10.0 m

DESIGN Cv = 5.0 m2/yr
DESIGN Cr = 10.0 m2/yr

SOIL IMPROVEMENT DESIGN USING STONE COLUMN (PRIEBE METHOD)

SOIL THK CORR. FOR COLUMN COMPRESSIBILITY CORR. FOR OVERBURDEN COMP. PARAMETERS
LAYER (Ac/A)1 Dc/Ds D(A/Ac) Mod(Ac/A) n1 Pc/Ps Pc GAMMA fd fd(max) n(max) n2 m UNIT WT. Cu Phi
(m) kPa kPa kN/m3 kPa deg.

1 10 0.90 48 0.108 0.264 2.88 8.1 449.6 31.0 1.2 5.9 13.77 3.34 0.65 18.6 8.7 30.4

(Ac/A)1 : Values of Area Ratio where the no= Dc/Ds

Dc : Constrained Modulus of Column
Ds : Constrained Modulud of Soil
Pc : Load on Column
Ps : Load on Soil

SUMMARY OF SETTLEMENT RESULTS

TOTAL CONSOLIDATION SETTLEMENT = 414 mm

RESIDUAL SETTLEMENT = 25.94 mm
TIME FOR 90 % CONSOLIDATION OF TREATED GROUND = 3 DAYS

C:\Users\Tim\Desktop\Report\Stone Column\Block 15\5CPT 01 B15 CH 750750-751100 (Centre).xlsm 29/12/2018

GCU Consultants Sdn Bhd Stone Column

EDT J447

DESIGN OF STONE COLUMN GROUND TREATMENT WORKS

LOCATION : CH 747375-747625

SERVICE STAGE- CONFORMING

EMBANKMENT GEOMETRY

HALF TOP WIDTH (B) = 7.5 m DIAMETER(D) = 1 m

EMBANKMENT SLOPE (1:?) = 2 COLUMN SPACING (S) = 2 m
DESIGN EMBANKMENT HEIGHT(H) = 7.4 m COLUMN DEPTH = 13.5 m
EMBANKMENT BASE WIDTH (W) = 22.3 m UNIT WEIGHT = 20 kN/m3
SURCHARGE HEIGHT = 0.6 m CONSTRAINED MODULUS = 120 MPa
ADD. FILL THK DUE TO SETTLEMENT = m FRICTION ANGLE = 42 degrees
POISSON RATIO = 0.333
LOADINGS GROUND WATER TABLE = 0 m
TRIBUTARY AREA FOR SINGLE COLUMN = 4.00
FILL UNIT WEIGHT = 20 kN/m3 AREA REPLACEMENT RATIO (Ac/A) = 0.1964
FILL LOAD = 160 kPa ACTIVE EARTH PRESSURE COEFF.(Kac) = 0.198
SUPERIMPOSED DEAD LOAD (SDL) = 12.5 kPa (SDL from Rails, Sleepers & Ballast) Ko EARTH PRESSURE COEFF. (Koc) = 0.331
SUPERIMPOSED LIVE LOAD (SDL) = 35 kPa (LL from trains) BASIC IMPROVEMENT FACTOR (n0) = 2.28
EXTENT/WIDTH OF SDL = 15 m (Acting at Top Sub-ballast Formation)
TOTAL DESIGN LOAD = 207.5 kPa

SUBSOIL STRATA & PROPERTIES

SOIL BOTTOM THK TYPE CONSTRAINED UNIT Su PHI

LAYER LEVEL MODULUS WEIGHT
(m) (m) (MPa) kN/m3 kPa degree

1 7.5 7.5 CLAY 2.00 16 20 0

2 13.5 6 CLAY 4.00 17 1 27

TREATED PORTION

DRAINAGE LENGTH (VERTICAL)= 13.5 m

DESIGN Cv = 5.0 m2/yr
DESIGN Cr = 10.0 m2/yr

SOIL IMPROVEMENT DESIGN USING STONE COLUMN (PRIEBE METHOD)

SOIL THK CORR. FOR COLUMN COMPRESSIBILITY CORR. FOR OVERBURDEN COMP. PARAMETERS
LAYER (Ac/A)1 Dc/Ds D(A/Ac) Mod(Ac/A) n1 Pc/Ps Pc GAMMA fd fd(max) n(max) n2 m UNIT WT. Cu Phi
(m) kPa kPa kN/m3 kPa deg.

1 7.5 0.92 60 0.086 0.193 2.26 7.5 690.5 23.2 1.1 8.0 12.59 2.42 0.56 18.2 8.9 26.6
2 6 0.85 30 0.175 0.190 2.23 7.5 696.2 68.0 1.2 4.0 6.69 2.78 0.55 18.7 0.4 36.0

(Ac/A)1 : Values of Area Ratio where the no= Dc/Ds

Dc : Constrained Modulus of Column
Ds : Constrained Modulud of Soil
Pc : Load on Column
Ps : Load on Soil

SUMMARY OF SETTLEMENT RESULTS

TOTAL CONSOLIDATION SETTLEMENT = 565 mm

RESIDUAL SETTLEMENT = 25.26 mm
TIME FOR 90 % CONSOLIDATION OF TREATED GROUND = 9 DAYS

C:\Users\Tim\Desktop\Report\Stone Column\Block 15\5DBH 111 B15 CH 747375 - 747600 (Centre).xlsm 29/12/2018

GCU Consultants Sdn Bhd Stone Column

EDT J447

DESIGN OF STONE COLUMN GROUND TREATMENT WORKS

LOCATION : CH 749275-749525

SERVICE STAGE- CONFORMING

EMBANKMENT GEOMETRY

HALF TOP WIDTH (B) = 7.5 m DIAMETER(D) = 1 m

EMBANKMENT SLOPE (1:?) = 2 COLUMN SPACING (S) = 2 m
DESIGN EMBANKMENT HEIGHT(H) = 5 m COLUMN DEPTH = 5 m
EMBANKMENT BASE WIDTH (W) = 17.5 m UNIT WEIGHT = 20 kN/m3
SURCHARGE HEIGHT = 0.6 m CONSTRAINED MODULUS = 120 MPa
ADD. FILL THK DUE TO SETTLEMENT = m FRICTION ANGLE = 42 degrees
POISSON RATIO = 0.333
LOADINGS GROUND WATER TABLE = 0 m
TRIBUTARY AREA FOR SINGLE COLUMN = 4.00
FILL UNIT WEIGHT = 20 kN/m3 AREA REPLACEMENT RATIO (Ac/A) = 0.1964
FILL LOAD = 112 kPa ACTIVE EARTH PRESSURE COEFF.(Kac) = 0.198
SUPERIMPOSED DEAD LOAD (SDL) = 12.5 kPa (SDL from Rails, Sleepers & Ballast) Ko EARTH PRESSURE COEFF. (Koc) = 0.331
SUPERIMPOSED LIVE LOAD (SDL) = 35 kPa (LL from trains) BASIC IMPROVEMENT FACTOR (n0) = 2.28
EXTENT/WIDTH OF SDL = 15 m (Acting at Top Sub-ballast Formation)
TOTAL DESIGN LOAD = 159.5 kPa

SUBSOIL STRATA & PROPERTIES

SOIL BOTTOM THK TYPE CONSTRAINED UNIT Su PHI

LAYER LEVEL MODULUS WEIGHT
(m) (m) (MPa) kN/m3 kPa degree

1 5 5 CLAY 2.00 16 20 0
2

TREATED PORTION

DRAINAGE LENGTH (VERTICAL)= 5.0 m

DESIGN Cv = 5.0 m2/yr
DESIGN Cr = 10.0 m2/yr

SOIL IMPROVEMENT DESIGN USING STONE COLUMN (PRIEBE METHOD)

SOIL THK CORR. FOR COLUMN COMPRESSIBILITY CORR. FOR OVERBURDEN COMP. PARAMETERS
LAYER (Ac/A)1 Dc/Ds D(A/Ac) Mod(Ac/A) n1 Pc/Ps Pc GAMMA fd fd(max) n(max) n2 m UNIT WT. Cu Phi
(m) kPa kPa kN/m3 kPa deg.

1 5 0.92 60 0.086 0.193 2.26 7.5 530.8 15.5 1.1 8.0 12.59 2.40 0.56 18.2 8.9 26.6

(Ac/A)1 : Values of Area Ratio where the no= Dc/Ds

Dc : Constrained Modulus of Column
Ds : Constrained Modulud of Soil
Pc : Load on Column
Ps : Load on Soil

SUMMARY OF SETTLEMENT RESULTS

TOTAL CONSOLIDATION SETTLEMENT = 366 mm

RESIDUAL SETTLEMENT = 21.57 mm
TIME FOR 90 % CONSOLIDATION OF TREATED GROUND = 9 DAYS

C:\Users\Tim\Desktop\Report\Stone Column\Block 15\5DCPT 08 B15 CH 749275-749525 (Centre).xlsm 29/12/2018

GCU Consultants Sdn Bhd Stone Column

EDT J447

DESIGN OF STONE COLUMN GROUND TREATMENT WORKS

LOCATION : CH 749275-749525

SERVICE STAGE- CONFORMING

EMBANKMENT GEOMETRY

HALF TOP WIDTH (B) = 7.5 m DIAMETER(D) = 1 m

EMBANKMENT SLOPE (1:?) = 2 COLUMN SPACING (S) = 1.7 m
DESIGN EMBANKMENT HEIGHT(H) = 2 m COLUMN DEPTH = 5 m
EMBANKMENT BASE WIDTH (W) = 11.5 m UNIT WEIGHT = 20 kN/m3
SURCHARGE HEIGHT = 0 m CONSTRAINED MODULUS = 120 MPa
ADD. FILL THK DUE TO SETTLEMENT = m FRICTION ANGLE = 42 degrees
POISSON RATIO = 0.333
LOADINGS GROUND WATER TABLE = 0 m
TRIBUTARY AREA FOR SINGLE COLUMN = 2.89
FILL UNIT WEIGHT = 20 kN/m3 AREA REPLACEMENT RATIO (Ac/A) = 0.2718
FILL LOAD = 40 kPa ACTIVE EARTH PRESSURE COEFF.(Kac) = 0.198
SUPERIMPOSED DEAD LOAD (SDL) = 12.5 kPa (SDL from Rails, Sleepers & Ballast) Ko EARTH PRESSURE COEFF. (Koc) = 0.331
SUPERIMPOSED LIVE LOAD (SDL) = 35 kPa (LL from trains) BASIC IMPROVEMENT FACTOR (n0) = 2.95
EXTENT/WIDTH OF SDL = 15 m (Acting at Top Sub-ballast Formation)
TOTAL DESIGN LOAD = 87.5 kPa

SUBSOIL STRATA & PROPERTIES

SOIL BOTTOM THK TYPE CONSTRAINED UNIT Su PHI

LAYER LEVEL MODULUS WEIGHT
(m) (m) (MPa) kN/m3 kPa degree

1 5 5 CLAY 2.00 16 20 0
2

TREATED PORTION

DRAINAGE LENGTH (VERTICAL)= 5.0 m

DESIGN Cv = 5.0 m2/yr
DESIGN Cr = 10.0 m2/yr

SOIL IMPROVEMENT DESIGN USING STONE COLUMN (PRIEBE METHOD)

SOIL THK CORR. FOR COLUMN COMPRESSIBILITY CORR. FOR OVERBURDEN COMP. PARAMETERS
LAYER (Ac/A)1 Dc/Ds D(A/Ac) Mod(Ac/A) n1 Pc/Ps Pc GAMMA fd fd(max) n(max) n2 m UNIT WT. Cu Phi
(m) kPa kPa kN/m3 kPa deg.

1 5 0.92 60 0.086 0.266 2.89 8.1 245.8 15.5 1.1 7.4 17.04 3.32 0.65 18.6 6.9 30.5

(Ac/A)1 : Values of Area Ratio where the no= Dc/Ds

Dc : Constrained Modulus of Column
Ds : Constrained Modulud of Soil
Pc : Load on Column
Ps : Load on Soil

SUMMARY OF SETTLEMENT RESULTS

TOTAL CONSOLIDATION SETTLEMENT = 155 mm

RESIDUAL SETTLEMENT = 20.71 mm
TIME FOR 90 % CONSOLIDATION OF TREATED GROUND = 3 DAYS

C:\Users\Tim\Desktop\Report\Stone Column\Block 15\5DCPT 08 B15 CH 749275-749525 (Side) .xlsm 29/12/2018

 APPENDIX G
PILED EMBANKMENT DESIGN
PROJECT TITLE EDT VE: Section 5

Block 15 (For Centre)

PILED EMBANKMENT DESIGN (AS PER BS 8110 FLAT SLAB DESIGN)

INPUT DATA

PILE WORKING LOAD = 600 kN

PILE SIZE = 250 mm
TYPE OF PILE = R
PILE SURFACE AREA = 62500.00 mm2
PILE FACE TO EDGE DISTANCE= 375 mm (X Axis) 375 mm (Y Axis)
DENSITY OF SOIL = 20 kN/m3
REINF. COVER = 40 mm
CONCRETE GRADE = 35 N/mm2
BAR SIZE = 12 mm

PARTIAL FACTORS

Concrete Dead Load 1.05

Earthfill Dead Load 1.10
Live Load 1.20

BM Coeff. (Mid-span) 0.063

BM Coeff (Support) 0.063

DESIGN FOR PILE SPACING

Embankment Height (m) 3.0 4.0 5.0

Slab Thk. (mm) 425 425 425

Embankment Dead Load (kPa) 60.6 80.6 100.6

Superimposed Dead Load (kPa) 9.6 9.6 9.6
Concrete Dead Load (kPa) 10.2 10.2 10.2
Live Load (kPa) 22.9 22.9 22.9
Load Disperses (Per m run in transverse 17.14 15.82 14.69
direction)

Load at pile level (kPa)

Purely vertical load only 97.6 116.2 135.1

Pile Spacing (m)

Based on vertical Load only 2.48 2.27 2.11

Adopt Pile Spacing (m) 2.45 2.25 2.10

DESIGN FOR BENDING (AS PER FLAT SLAB DESIGN)

Ult. Dead Load at pile level (kPa) 87.952 109.952 131.952

Ult. Live Load at pile level (kPa) 20.565 18.983 17.627
Total Ult. Load (kPa) 108.517 128.935 149.579

Moment per column/middle strip

Ult. Support Moment (kNm) 75.4 69.4 65.5
Ult.Span Moment (kNm) 55.3 50.9 48.0

Moment per m
Ult. Support Moment (kNm) 61.6 61.7 62.3
Ult.Span Moment (kNm) 45.1 45.2 45.7

Top Steel

Effective depth (mm) 367 367 367

M/bd2fcu 0.013 0.013 0.013
Compression Bar Requirement NR NR NR
z (mm) 348.65 348.65 348.65
As min.(mm2/m) 552.5 552.5 552.5

As reqd.(mm2/m) 553 553 553

As prov.(mm2/m) 566 566 566
T12 - 200 T12 - 200 T12 - 200

Page 1 of 4
PROJECT TITLE EDT VE: Section 5

Block 15 (For Centre)

PILED EMBANKMENT DESIGN (AS PER BS 8110 FLAT SLAB DESIGN)
Bottom Steel

Effective depth (mm) 367 367 367

M/bd2fcu 0.010 0.010 0.010
Compression Bar Requirement NR NR NR
z (mm) 348.65 348.65 348.65
As min.(mm2/m) 552.5 552.5 552.5

As reqd.(mm2/m) 553 553 553

As prov.(mm2/m) 566 566 566
T12 - 200 T12 - 200 T12 - 200

CHECK FOR PUNCHING SHEAR

1. AT THE PILE PERIMETER (EDGE & EQUAL SPAN SLAB-COLUMN CONNECTIONS)

Factor Of Effective Shear 1.4 1.4 1.4

Pile Perimeter (mm) 1000.00 1000.00 1000.00
Ult. Shear Stress (N/mm2) 2.46 2.46 2.48
Allow. Shear Stress (N/mm2) 4.73 4.73 4.73

OK OK OK

2.3 INTERNAL PILE

Factor Of Effective Shear 1.15 1.15 1.15

Width of Shear Plane (X) (mm) 1351 1351 1351
Breadth of Shear Plane (Y) (mm) 1351 1351 1351
Punching Shear Force (kN) 749.1 750.6 758.6
Shear at 1.5D 412.5 383.3 360.9

Ult. Shear Stress (N/mm2) 0.208 0.193 0.182

As prov. 566 566 566

100As/bd 0.15 0.15 0.15
400/d 1.09 1.09 1.09
vc 0.388 0.388 0.388

OK OK OK

Page 2 of 4
PROJECT TITLE EDT VE: Section 5

Block 15 (For Edge)

PILED EMBANKMENT DESIGN (AS PER BS 8110 FLAT SLAB DESIGN)

INPUT DATA

PILE WORKING LOAD = 600 kN

PILE SIZE = 250 mm
TYPE OF PILE = R
PILE SURFACE AREA = 62500.00 mm2
PILE FACE TO EDGE DISTANCE= 375 mm (X Axis) 375 mm (Y Axis)
DENSITY OF SOIL = 20 kN/m3
REINF. COVER = 40 mm
CONCRETE GRADE = 35 N/mm2
BAR SIZE = 12 mm

PARTIAL FACTORS

Concrete Dead Load 1.05

Earthfill Dead Load 1.10
Live Load 1.20

BM Coeff. (Mid-span) 0.075

BM Coeff (Support) 0.086

DESIGN FOR PILE SPACING

Embankment Height (m) 3.0 4.0 5.0

Slab Thk. (mm) 425 425 425

Embankment Dead Load (kPa) 40.0 60.0 80.0

Superimposed Dead Load (kPa) 0.0 0.0 0.0
Concrete Dead Load (kPa) 10.2 10.2 10.2
Live Load (kPa) 0.0 0.0 0.0
Load Disperses (Per m run in transverse 0.00 0.00 0.00
direction)

Load at pile level (kPa)

Purely vertical load only 50.2 70.2 90.2

Pile Spacing (m)

Based on vertical Load only 3.46 2.92 2.58

Adopt Pile Spacing (m) 2.45 2.25 2.10

DESIGN FOR BENDING (AS PER FLAT SLAB DESIGN)

Ult. Dead Load at pile level (kPa) 54.71 76.71 98.71

Ult. Live Load at pile level (kPa) 0.000 0.000 0.000
Total Ult. Load (kPa) 54.710 76.710 98.710

Moment per column/middle strip

Ult. Support Moment (kNm) 51.9 56.4 59.0
Ult.Span Moment (kNm) 33.2 36.0 37.7

Moment per m
Ult. Support Moment (kNm) 42.4 50.1 56.2
Ult.Span Moment (kNm) 27.1 32.0 35.9

Top Steel

Effective depth (mm) 367 367 367

M/bd2fcu 0.009 0.011 0.012
Compression Bar Requirement NR NR NR
z (mm) 348.65 348.65 348.65
As min.(mm2/m) 552.5 552.5 552.5

As reqd.(mm2/m) 553 553 553

As prov.(mm2/m) 566 566 566
T12 - 200 T12 - 200 T12 - 200

Page 3 of 4
PROJECT TITLE EDT VE: Section 5

Block 15 (For Edge)

PILED EMBANKMENT DESIGN (AS PER BS 8110 FLAT SLAB DESIGN)
Bottom Steel

Effective depth (mm) 367 367 367

M/bd2fcu 0.006 0.007 0.008
Compression Bar Requirement NR NR NR
z (mm) 348.65 348.65 348.65
As min.(mm2/m) 552.5 552.5 552.5

As reqd.(mm2/m) 553 553 553

As prov.(mm2/m) 566 566 566
T12 - 200 T12 - 200 T12 - 200

CHECK FOR PUNCHING SHEAR

2. AT 1.5D FROM PILE EDGE

2.1 EDGE PILE

Factor Of Effective Shear 1.4 1.4 1.4

Width of Shear Plane (X) (mm) 1175.5 1175.5 1175.5
Breadth of Shear Plane (Y) (mm) 1351 1351 1351
Punching Shear Force (kN) 323.7 392.7 449.8
Shear at 1.5D 178.2 200.5 214.0

Ult. Shear Stress (N/mm2) 0.131 0.148 0.158

As prov. 566 566 566

100As/bd 0.15 0.15 0.15
400/d 1.09 1.09 1.09
vc 0.388 0.388 0.388

OK OK OK

2.2 CORNER PILE

Factor Of Effective Shear 1.25 1.25 1.25

Width of Shear Plane (X) (mm) 1175.5 1175.5 1175.5
Breadth of Shear Plane (Y) (mm) 1175.5 1175.5 1175.5
Punching Shear Force (kN) 203.5 253.2 296.4
Shear at 1.5D 112.0 129.3 141.0

Ult. Shear Stress (N/mm2) 0.130 0.150 0.163

As prov. 566 566 566

100As/bd 0.15 0.15 0.15
400/d 1.09 1.09 1.09
vc 0.388 0.388 0.388

OK OK OK

Page 4 of 4
PROJECT TITLE EDT VE: Section 5

Block 15 (For Centre)

PILED EMBANKMENT DESIGN (AS PER BS 8110 FLAT SLAB DESIGN)

INPUT DATA

PILE WORKING LOAD = 600 kN

PILE SIZE = 250 mm
TYPE OF PILE = R
PILE SURFACE AREA = 62500.00 mm2
PILE FACE TO EDGE DISTANCE= 375 mm (X Axis) 375 mm (Y Axis)
DENSITY OF SOIL = 20 kN/m3
REINF. COVER = 40 mm
CONCRETE GRADE = 35 N/mm2
BAR SIZE = 12 mm

PARTIAL FACTORS

Concrete Dead Load 1.05

Earthfill Dead Load 1.10
Live Load 1.20

BM Coeff. (Mid-span) 0.063

BM Coeff (Support) 0.063

DESIGN FOR PILE SPACING

Embankment Height (m) 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 11.0 12.0
Slab Thk. (mm) 425 425 425 425 425 425 425

Embankment Dead Load (kPa) 120.6 140.6 160.6 180.6 200.6 220.6 240.6
Superimposed Dead Load (kPa) 9.6 9.6 9.6 9.6 9.6 9.6 9.6
Concrete Dead Load (kPa) 10.2 10.2 10.2 10.2 10.2 10.2 10.2
Live Load (kPa) 22.9 22.9 22.9 22.9 22.9 22.9 22.9
Load Disperses (Per m run in transverse 13.71 12.85 12.10 11.43 10.82 10.28 9.79
direction)

Load at pile level (kPa)

Purely vertical load only 154.1 173.3 192.5 211.8 231.2 250.7 270.2

Pile Spacing (m)

Based on vertical Load only 1.97 1.86 1.77 1.68 1.61 1.55 1.49

Adopt Pile Spacing (m) 1.95 1.80 1.70 1.65 1.55 1.50 1.45

DESIGN FOR BENDING (AS PER FLAT SLAB DESIGN)

Ult. Dead Load at pile level (kPa) 153.952 175.952 197.952 219.952 241.952 263.952 285.952
Ult. Live Load at pile level (kPa) 16.452 15.424 14.516 13.710 12.988 12.339 11.751
Total Ult. Load (kPa) 170.404 191.376 212.468 233.662 254.940 276.291 297.703

Moment per column/middle strip

Ult. Support Moment (kNm) 59.7 52.7 49.3 49.6 44.9 44.1 42.9
Ult.Span Moment (kNm) 43.8 38.7 36.2 36.4 32.9 32.3 31.4

Moment per m
Ult. Support Moment (kNm) 61.2 58.6 58.0 60.1 57.9 58.7 59.1
Ult.Span Moment (kNm) 44.9 43.0 42.6 44.1 42.4 43.1 43.4

Top Steel

Effective depth (mm) 367 367 367 367 367 367 367
M/bd2fcu 0.013 0.012 0.012 0.013 0.012 0.012 0.013
Compression Bar Requirement NR NR NR NR NR NR NR
z (mm) 348.65 348.65 348.65 348.65 348.65 348.65 348.65
As min.(mm2/m) 552.5 552.5 552.5 552.5 552.5 552.5 552.5

As reqd.(mm2/m) 553 553 553 553 553 553 553

As prov.(mm2/m) 566 566 566 566 566 566 566
T12 - 200 T12 - 200 T12 - 200 T12 - 200 T12 - 200 T12 - 200 T12 - 200

Page 1 of 4
PROJECT TITLE EDT VE: Section 5

Block 15 (For Centre)

PILED EMBANKMENT DESIGN (AS PER BS 8110 FLAT SLAB DESIGN)
Bottom Steel

Effective depth (mm) 367 367 367 367 367 367 367
M/bd2fcu 0.010 0.009 0.009 0.009 0.009 0.009 0.009
Compression Bar Requirement NR NR NR NR NR NR NR
z (mm) 348.65 348.65 348.65 348.65 348.65 348.65 348.65
As min.(mm2/m) 552.5 552.5 552.5 552.5 552.5 552.5 552.5

As reqd.(mm2/m) 553 553 553 553 553 553 553

As prov.(mm2/m) 566 566 566 566 566 566 566
T12 - 200 T12 - 200 T12 - 200 T12 - 200 T12 - 200 T12 - 200 T12 - 200

CHECK FOR PUNCHING SHEAR

1. AT THE PILE PERIMETER (EDGE & EQUAL SPAN SLAB-COLUMN CONNECTIONS)

Factor Of Effective Shear 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4
Pile Perimeter (mm) 1000.00 1000.00 1000.00 1000.00 1000.00 1000.00 1000.00
Ult. Shear Stress (N/mm2) 2.43 2.32 2.29 2.37 2.28 2.31 2.32
Allow. Shear Stress (N/mm2) 4.73 4.73 4.73 4.73 4.73 4.73 4.73

OK OK OK OK OK OK OK

2.3 INTERNAL PILE

Factor Of Effective Shear 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15
Width of Shear Plane (X) (mm) 1351 1351 1351 1351 1351 1351 1351
Breadth of Shear Plane (Y) (mm) 1351 1351 1351 1351 1351 1351 1351
Punching Shear Force (kN) 745.2 713.1 706.1 731.6 704.4 714.9 719.8
Shear at 1.5D 324.4 276.9 248.8 243.4 204.0 190.2 173.3

Ult. Shear Stress (N/mm2) 0.164 0.140 0.125 0.123 0.103 0.096 0.087

As prov. 566 566 566 566 566 566 566

100As/bd 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15
400/d 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09
vc 0.388 0.388 0.388 0.388 0.388 0.388 0.388

OK OK OK OK OK OK OK

Page 2 of 4
PROJECT TITLE EDT VE: Section 5

Block 15 (For Edge)

PILED EMBANKMENT DESIGN (AS PER BS 8110 FLAT SLAB DESIGN)

INPUT DATA

PILE WORKING LOAD = 600 kN

PILE SIZE = 250 mm
TYPE OF PILE = R
PILE SURFACE AREA = 62500.00 mm2
PILE FACE TO EDGE DISTANCE= 375 mm (X Axis) 375 mm (Y Axis)
DENSITY OF SOIL = 20 kN/m3
REINF. COVER = 40 mm
CONCRETE GRADE = 35 N/mm2
BAR SIZE = 12 mm

PARTIAL FACTORS

Concrete Dead Load 1.05

Earthfill Dead Load 1.10
Live Load 1.20

BM Coeff. (Mid-span) 0.075

BM Coeff (Support) 0.086

DESIGN FOR PILE SPACING

Embankment Height (m) 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 11.0 12.0
Slab Thk. (mm) 425 425 425 425 425 425 425

Embankment Dead Load (kPa) 100.0 120.0 140.0 160.0 180.0 200.0 220.0
Superimposed Dead Load (kPa) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Concrete Dead Load (kPa) 10.2 10.2 10.2 10.2 10.2 10.2 10.2
Live Load (kPa) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Load Disperses (Per m run in transverse 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
direction)

Load at pile level (kPa)

Purely vertical load only 110.2 130.2 150.2 170.2 190.2 210.2 230.2

Pile Spacing (m)

Based on vertical Load only 2.33 2.15 2.00 1.88 1.78 1.69 1.61

Adopt Pile Spacing (m) 1.95 1.80 1.70 1.65 1.55 1.50 1.45

DESIGN FOR BENDING (AS PER FLAT SLAB DESIGN)

Ult. Dead Load at pile level (kPa) 120.71 142.71 164.71 186.71 208.71 230.71 252.71
Ult. Live Load at pile level (kPa) 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Total Ult. Load (kPa) 120.710 142.710 164.710 186.710 208.710 230.710 252.710

Moment per column/middle strip

Ult. Support Moment (kNm) 57.7 53.7 52.2 54.1 50.1 50.2 49.7
Ult.Span Moment (kNm) 36.9 34.3 33.4 34.6 32.1 32.1 31.8

Moment per m
Ult. Support Moment (kNm) 59.2 59.6 61.4 65.6 64.7 67.0 68.5
Ult.Span Moment (kNm) 37.9 38.1 39.3 41.9 41.4 42.8 43.8

Top Steel

Effective depth (mm) 367 367 367 367 367 367 367
M/bd2fcu 0.013 0.013 0.013 0.014 0.014 0.014 0.015
Compression Bar Requirement NR NR NR NR NR NR NR
z (mm) 348.65 348.65 348.65 348.65 348.65 348.65 348.65
As min.(mm2/m) 552.5 552.5 552.5 552.5 552.5 552.5 552.5

As reqd.(mm2/m) 553 553 553 553 553 553 553

As prov.(mm2/m) 566 566 566 566 566 566 566
T12 - 200 T12 - 200 T12 - 200 T12 - 200 T12 - 200 T12 - 200 T12 - 200

Page 3 of 4
PROJECT TITLE EDT VE: Section 5

Block 15 (For Edge)

PILED EMBANKMENT DESIGN (AS PER BS 8110 FLAT SLAB DESIGN)
Bottom Steel

Effective depth (mm) 367 367 367 367 367 367 367
M/bd2fcu 0.008 0.008 0.008 0.009 0.009 0.009 0.009
Compression Bar Requirement NR NR NR NR NR NR NR
z (mm) 348.65 348.65 348.65 348.65 348.65 348.65 348.65
As min.(mm2/m) 552.5 552.5 552.5 552.5 552.5 552.5 552.5

As reqd.(mm2/m) 553 553 553 553 553 553 553

As prov.(mm2/m) 566 566 566 566 566 566 566
T12 - 200 T12 - 200 T12 - 200 T12 - 200 T12 - 200 T12 - 200 T12 - 200

CHECK FOR PUNCHING SHEAR

1. AT THE PILE PERIMETER (EDGE & EQUAL SPAN SLAB-COLUMN CONNECTIONS)

Factor Of Effective Shear 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4
Pile Perimeter (mm) 1000.00 1000.00 1000.00 1000.00 1000.00 1000.00 1000.00
Ult. Shear Stress (N/mm2) 1.72 1.73 1.78 1.89 1.86 1.93 1.97
Allow. Shear Stress (N/mm2) 4.73 4.73 4.73 4.73 4.73 4.73 4.73

OK OK OK OK OK OK OK

2. AT 1.5D FROM PILE EDGE

2.1 EDGE PILE

Factor Of Effective Shear 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4
Width of Shear Plane (X) (mm) 1175.5 1175.5 1175.5 1175.5 1175.5 1175.5 1175.5
Breadth of Shear Plane (Y) (mm) 1351 1351 1351 1351 1351 1351 1351
Punching Shear Force (kN) 486.1 503.5 529.2 571.5 577.4 605.6 628.4
Shear at 1.5D 211.6 195.5 186.5 190.1 167.3 161.1 151.3

Ult. Shear Stress (N/mm2) 0.156 0.144 0.137 0.140 0.123 0.119 0.111

As prov. 566 566 566 566 566 566 566

100As/bd 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15
400/d 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09
vc 0.388 0.388 0.388 0.388 0.388 0.388 0.388

OK OK OK OK OK OK OK

2.2 CORNER PILE

Factor Of Effective Shear 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25
Width of Shear Plane (X) (mm) 1175.5 1175.5 1175.5 1175.5 1175.5 1175.5 1175.5
Breadth of Shear Plane (Y) (mm) 1175.5 1175.5 1175.5 1175.5 1175.5 1175.5 1175.5
Punching Shear Force (kN) 328.3 349.6 375.2 409.7 424.1 450.6 474.0
Shear at 1.5D 142.9 135.8 132.2 136.3 122.9 119.9 114.1

Ult. Shear Stress (N/mm2) 0.166 0.157 0.153 0.158 0.142 0.139 0.132

As prov. 566 566 566 566 566 566 566

100As/bd 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15
400/d 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09
vc 0.388 0.388 0.388 0.388 0.388 0.388 0.388

OK OK OK OK OK OK OK

Page 4 of 4
PROJECT J447
LOCATION Kempas Baru to Johor Bahru
BOREHOLE 5 DBH 108

PILE DETAILS GCU Default Properties DESIGN DETAILS

PILE TYPE RC WORKING LOAD 600 kN ROCK FACTOR OF SAFETY

PILE SIZE 250 mm sq Type ROCK LIMITATION SHAFT FRICTION 1.5
fcu 45 N/mm2 COHESIVE SOIL Unit Shaft Friction 0.25 (UCS)½ kPa 2000 kPa END BEARING 1.5
Unit Shaft Friction α Su kPa Unit End Bearing 0.3 (UCS) kPa 20000 kPa UPLIFT 3
PILE CIRCUMFERENCE 1.00 m Unit End Bearing 9 Su kPa
PILE BASE AREA 0.063 m2 SOIL LIMITATION Max end bearing contributi 100 % of WL
UNIT PILE WEIGHT 1.50 kN/m3 per m COHESIONLESS SOIL / RESIDUAL SOIL fsu 200 kPa
Unit Shaft Friction 2 N kPa fbu 10000 kPa Reduction factor 0.7
STRUCTURAL 703 kN Unit End Bearing 200 N kPa (for tension capacity)
CAPACITY

DEPTH LAYER SOIL TYPE DESIGN PARAMETERS SHAFT FRICTION END BEARING PILE SELFWEIGHT (kN) PILE CAPACITY (kN)
THICKNESS 1 - Cohesive Soil SPT 'N' - for soil Soil Bulk Density Undrained Adhesion fsu Ultimate Cumulative Cumulative fbu Ultimate Allowable Each Cumulative Ultimate Ultimate Allowable Allowable
2 - Cohesionless Soil / UCS(Mpa) - for rock Shear Strength Factor Shaft Friction Ultimate Allowable End End Layer Self Compression Tension Compression Tension
Residual Soil Su for every layer Shaft Friction Shaft Friction Bearing Bearing Weight Capacity Capacity Capacity Capacity
(m) (m) 3 - Rock (kN/m2) α (kPa) (kN) (kN) (kN) (kPa) (kN) (kN)
0.0 0.0
1.5 1.50 1 0 16 10
3.0 1.50 1 0 16 10 1 10 15 15 10 90 6 4 2 2 21 13 14 6
4.5 1.50 1 1 16 10 1 10 15 30 20 90 6 4 2 5 36 26 24 12
6.0 1.50 1 50 17 10 1 10 15 45 30 90 6 4 2 7 51 38 34 17
7.5 1.50 1 0 16 10 1 10 15 60 40 90 6 4 2 9 66 51 44 23
9.0 1.50 2 10 17 10 1 10 15 75 50 2000 125 83 2 11 200 64 133 29
10.5 1.50 2 30 17 20 30 105 70 6000 375 250 2 14 480 87 320 38
12.0 1.50 2 100 17 60 90 195 130 10000 625 417 2 16 820 152 547 61
13.5 1.50 2 100 17 200 300 495 330 10000 625 417 2 18 1120 365 747 134
15.0 1.50
16.5 1.50

Notes : Summary :-
* Tension capacity is taken as Pile length - In soil = 12.0 m
70% of the compression shaft friction. - In rock = 0.0 m
* Adhesion Factor, α = 1 - 0.5(Su - 25)/50 Total pile length = 12.0 m
Pile Type BP - Bored pile Allowable compression capacity = 747 kN OK!
CA - Caisson Allowable tension capacity = 134 kN
MP - Micropile
RC - RC Square Pile
SP - Spun Pile
PROJECT J447
LOCATION Kempas Baru to Johor Bahru
BOREHOLE 5 DBH 112

PILE DETAILS GCU Default Properties DESIGN DETAILS

PILE TYPE RC WORKING LOAD 600 kN ROCK FACTOR OF SAFETY

PILE SIZE 250 mm sq Type ROCK LIMITATION SHAFT FRICTION 1.5
fcu 45 N/mm2 COHESIVE SOIL Unit Shaft Friction 0.25 (UCS)½ kPa 2000 kPa END BEARING 1.5
Unit Shaft Friction α Su kPa Unit End Bearing 0.3 (UCS) kPa 20000 kPa UPLIFT 3
PILE CIRCUMFERENCE 1.00 m Unit End Bearing 9 Su kPa
PILE BASE AREA 0.063 m2 SOIL LIMITATION Max end bearing contributi 100 % of WL
UNIT PILE WEIGHT 1.50 kN/m3 per m COHESIONLESS SOIL / RESIDUAL SOIL fsu 200 kPa
Unit Shaft Friction 2 N kPa fbu 10000 kPa Reduction factor 0.7
STRUCTURAL 703 kN Unit End Bearing 200 N kPa (for tension capacity)
CAPACITY

DEPTH LAYER SOIL TYPE DESIGN PARAMETERS SHAFT FRICTION END BEARING PILE SELFWEIGHT (kN) PILE CAPACITY (kN)
THICKNESS 1 - Cohesive Soil SPT 'N' - for soil Soil Bulk Density Undrained Adhesion fsu Ultimate Cumulative Cumulative fbu Ultimate Allowable Each Cumulative Ultimate Ultimate Allowable Allowable
2 - Cohesionless Soil / UCS(Mpa) - for rock Shear Strength Factor Shaft Friction Ultimate Allowable End End Layer Self Compression Tension Compression Tension
Residual Soil Su for every layer Shaft Friction Shaft Friction Bearing Bearing Weight Capacity Capacity Capacity Capacity
(m) (m) 3 - Rock (kN/m2) α (kPa) (kN) (kN) (kN) (kPa) (kN) (kN)
0.0 0.0
1.5 1.50
3.0 1.50 1 3 16 10 0 0 0 0 90 6 4 2 2 6 2 4 2
4.5 1.50 2 5 10 1 10 15 15 10 1000 63 42 2 5 78 15 52 8
6.0 1.50 2 5 10 15 30 20 1000 63 42 2 7 93 28 62 14
7.5 1.50 2 26 10 15 45 30 5200 325 217 2 9 370 41 247 20
9.0 1.50 2 11 52 78 123 82 2200 138 92 2 11 261 97 174 40
10.5 1.50 2 17 22 33 156 104 3400 213 142 2 14 369 123 246 50
12.0 1.50 2 100 34 51 207 138 10000 625 417 2 16 832 161 555 64
13.5 1.50 2 100 200 300 507 338 10000 625 417 2 18 1132 373 755 136
15.0 1.50
16.5 1.50

Notes : Summary :-
* Tension capacity is taken as Pile length - In soil = 12.0 m
70% of the compression shaft friction. - In rock = 0.0 m
* Adhesion Factor, α = 1 - 0.5(Su - 25)/50 Total pile length = 12.0 m
Pile Type BP - Bored pile Allowable compression capacity = 755 kN OK!
CA - Caisson Allowable tension capacity = 136 kN
MP - Micropile
RC - RC Square Pile
SP - Spun Pile
PROJECT J447
LOCATION Kempas Baru to Johor Bahru
BOREHOLE 5 DBH 116

PILE DETAILS GCU Default Properties DESIGN DETAILS

PILE TYPE RC WORKING LOAD 600 kN ROCK FACTOR OF SAFETY

PILE SIZE 250 mm sq Type ROCK LIMITATION SHAFT FRICTION 1.5
fcu 45 N/mm2 COHESIVE SOIL Unit Shaft Friction 0.25 (UCS)½ kPa 2000 kPa END BEARING 1.5
Unit Shaft Friction α Su kPa Unit End Bearing 0.3 (UCS) kPa 20000 kPa UPLIFT 3
PILE CIRCUMFERENCE 1.00 m Unit End Bearing 9 Su kPa
PILE BASE AREA 0.063 m2 SOIL LIMITATION Max end bearing contributi 100 % of WL
UNIT PILE WEIGHT 1.50 kN/m3 per m COHESIONLESS SOIL / RESIDUAL SOIL fsu 200 kPa
Unit Shaft Friction 2 N kPa fbu 10000 kPa Reduction factor 0.7
STRUCTURAL 703 kN Unit End Bearing 200 N kPa (for tension capacity)
CAPACITY

DEPTH LAYER SOIL TYPE DESIGN PARAMETERS SHAFT FRICTION END BEARING PILE SELFWEIGHT (kN) PILE CAPACITY (kN)
THICKNESS 1 - Cohesive Soil SPT 'N' - for soil Soil Bulk Density Undrained Adhesion fsu Ultimate Cumulative Cumulative fbu Ultimate Allowable Each Cumulative Ultimate Ultimate Allowable Allowable
2 - Cohesionless Soil / UCS(Mpa) - for rock Shear Strength Factor Shaft Friction Ultimate Allowable End End Layer Self Compression Tension Compression Tension
Residual Soil Su for every layer Shaft Friction Shaft Friction Bearing Bearing Weight Capacity Capacity Capacity Capacity
(m) (m) 3 - Rock (kN/m2) α (kPa) (kN) (kN) (kN) (kPa) (kN) (kN)
0.0 0.0
1.5 1.50 1 3 16 10
3.0 1.50 2 4 10 1 10 15 15 10 800 50 33 2 2 65 13 43 6
4.5 1.50 2 5 8 12 27 18 1000 63 42 2 5 90 23 60 11
6.0 1.50 2 6 10 15 42 28 1200 75 50 2 7 117 36 78 17
7.5 1.50 2 12 12 18 60 40 2400 150 100 2 9 210 51 140 23
9.0 1.50 2 15 24 36 96 64 3000 188 125 2 11 284 78 189 34
10.5 1.50 2 9 30 45 141 94 1800 113 75 2 14 254 112 169 46
12.0 1.50 2 11 18 27 168 112 2200 138 92 2 16 306 133 204 55
13.5 1.50 2 33 22 33 201 134 6600 413 275 2 18 614 159 409 65
15.0 1.50 2 50 66 99 300 200 10000 625 417 2 20 925 230 617 90
16.5 1.50

Notes : Summary :-
* Tension capacity is taken as Pile length - In soil = 13.5 m
70% of the compression shaft friction. - In rock = 0.0 m
* Adhesion Factor, α = 1 - 0.5(Su - 25)/50 Total pile length = 13.5 m
Pile Type BP - Bored pile Allowable compression capacity = 617 kN OK!
CA - Caisson Allowable tension capacity = 90 kN
MP - Micropile
RC - RC Square Pile
SP - Spun Pile
 APPENDIX H
BEARING CAPACITY CALCULATION FOR
BOX CULVERT
 Project Title Job No.
Sepakat Setia Perunding (Sdn) Bhd
Electrified Double Track SP3D
Serial No. Sheet No.
CALCULATION SHEET BC275
Calculation Title: Design Check Review Date
Allowable Bearing Capacity for Pad Footing TTC SFK CCS 26-09-18

DATA ENTRY
a) Dimensions of foundation:
Borehole Ref = 5DBH-109
i) Type of foundation = Strip qu=cNc+qNq+0.5gBNg
ii) Depth of embedment, Df = 7.389 m
iii) Width of foundation, B = 4.2 m Option 1
iv) Length of foundation, L = 1 m
v) Depth of groundwater table, Dw = 3.939 m below existing ground level
vi) Factor of Safety = 3

b) Properties of foundation soil beneath the foundation:

i) Effective shear strength, cf' = 5 kPa

ii) Effective angle of friction, ff' = 30 Degree
iii) Bulk unit weight of soil, gb = 20 kN/m3

Analysis Results
Bearing capacity factors (Vesic, Hansen, Meyerhof) calculated based on foundation soil properties:

Nq = 18.401 [ tan2(45+ff'/2)eptanff' ]
Nc = 30.140 [ (Nq-1)cotff' ]
Ng = 22.402 Vesic [ 2(Nq+1)tanff']
18.084 Hansen [ 1.8(Nq-1)tanff']
15.668 Meyerhof [ (Nq-1)tan(1.4ff') ]

q' = 113.94 [ gDw+g'(Df-Dw) ]

g bar = NA [ g'+(Dw-Df)(g-g')/B ]

For Df/B ratio, if B = then

4.2 1.759 >=1

Shape factor:
B= lqs = lcs = lgs =
4.2 3.425 3.564 -0.680

Depth factor: Inclination factor:

B= lqd = lcd = lgd = a = - (tan-1Fh/Fv)

4.2 1.304 1.422 1.000

Terzaghi Method General Method

qu qall qall
qu qu qall qall
B (Ng based (Ng based (Recommended
(Ng based (Ng based (Ng based (Ng based qu qall
on on )
on Vesic) on Hansen) on Vesic) on Hansen)
Meyerhof) Meyerhof)
4.2 2575.9 2634.2 2582.5 858.6 878.1 860.8 9802.53 3267.51 860.8
 Project Title Job No.
Sepakat Setia Perunding (Sdn) Bhd
Electrified Double Track SP3D
Serial No. Sheet No.
CALCULATION SHEET BC276
Calculation Title: Design Check Review Date
Allowable Bearing Capacity for Pad Footing TTC SFK CCS 26-09-18

DATA ENTRY
a) Dimensions of foundation:
Borehole Ref = 5DBH-110
i) Type of foundation = Strip qu=cNc+qNq+0.5gBNg
ii) Depth of embedment, Df = 5.731 m
iii) Width of foundation, B = 3.05 m Option 1
iv) Length of foundation, L = 1 m
v) Depth of groundwater table, Dw = 3.281 m below existing ground level
vi) Factor of Safety = 3

b) Properties of foundation soil beneath the foundation:

i) Effective shear strength, cf' = 5 kPa

ii) Effective angle of friction, ff' = 30 Degree
iii) Bulk unit weight of soil, gb = 20 kN/m3

Analysis Results
Bearing capacity factors (Vesic, Hansen, Meyerhof) calculated based on foundation soil properties:

Nq = 18.401 [ tan2(45+ff'/2)eptanff' ]
Nc = 30.140 [ (Nq-1)cotff' ]
Ng = 22.402 Vesic [ 2(Nq+1)tanff']
18.084 Hansen [ 1.8(Nq-1)tanff']
15.668 Meyerhof [ (Nq-1)tan(1.4ff') ]

q' = 90.59 [ gDw+g'(Df-Dw) ]

g bar = NA [ g'+(Dw-Df)(g-g')/B ]

For Df/B ratio, if B = then

3.05 1.879 >=1

Shape factor:
B= lqs = lcs = lgs =
3.05 2.761 2.862 -0.220

Depth factor: Inclination factor:

B= lqd = lcd = lgd = a = - (tan-1Fh/Fv)

3.05 1.312 1.433 1.000

Terzaghi Method General Method

qu qall qall
qu qu qall qall
B (Ng based (Ng based (Recommended
(Ng based (Ng based (Ng based (Ng based qu qall
on on )
on Vesic) on Hansen) on Vesic) on Hansen)
Meyerhof) Meyerhof)
3.05 2015.0 2098.6 2061.1 671.7 699.5 687.0 6580.55 2193.52 687.0
 Project Title Job No.
Sepakat Setia Perunding (Sdn) Bhd
Electrified Double Track SP3D
Serial No. Sheet No.
CALCULATION SHEET BC277
Calculation Title: Design Check Review Date
Allowable Bearing Capacity for Pad Footing TTC SFK CCS 26-09-18

DATA ENTRY
a) Dimensions of foundation:
Borehole Ref = 5DBH-111
i) Type of foundation = Strip qu=cNc+qNq+0.5gBNg
ii) Depth of embedment, Df = 12.964 m
iii) Width of foundation, B = 7.5 m Option 1
iv) Length of foundation, L = 1 m
v) Depth of groundwater table, Dw = 7.864 m below existing ground level
vi) Factor of Safety = 3

b) Properties of foundation soil beneath the foundation:

i) Effective shear strength, cf' = 5 kPa

ii) Effective angle of friction, ff' = 30 Degree
iii) Bulk unit weight of soil, gb = 20 kN/m3

Analysis Results
Bearing capacity factors (Vesic, Hansen, Meyerhof) calculated based on foundation soil properties:

Nq = 18.401 [ tan2(45+ff'/2)eptanff' ]
Nc = 30.140 [ (Nq-1)cotff' ]
Ng = 22.402 Vesic [ 2(Nq+1)tanff']
18.084 Hansen [ 1.8(Nq-1)tanff']
15.668 Meyerhof [ (Nq-1)tan(1.4ff') ]

q' = 209.25 [ gDw+g'(Df-Dw) ]

g bar = NA [ g'+(Dw-Df)(g-g')/B ]

For Df/B ratio, if B = then

7.5 1.729 >=1

Shape factor:
B= lqs = lcs = lgs =
7.5 5.330 5.579 -2.000

Depth factor: Inclination factor:

B= lqd = lcd = lgd = a = - (tan-1Fh/Fv)

7.5 1.302 1.419 1.000

Terzaghi Method General Method

qu qall qall
qu qu qall qall
B (Ng based (Ng based (Recommended
(Ng based (Ng based (Ng based (Ng based qu qall
on on )
on Vesic) on Hansen) on Vesic) on Hansen)
Meyerhof) Meyerhof)
7.5 4706.5 4692.1 4599.8 1568.8 1564.0 1533.3 26202.66 8734.22 1533.3
 Project Title Job No.
Sepakat Setia Perunding (Sdn) Bhd
Electrified Double Track SP3D
Serial No. Sheet No.
CALCULATION SHEET BC278
Calculation Title: Design Check Review Date
Allowable Bearing Capacity for Pad Footing TTC SFK CCS 26-09-18

DATA ENTRY
a) Dimensions of foundation:
Borehole Ref = 5DBH-117
i) Type of foundation = Strip qu=cNc+qNq+0.5gBNg
ii) Depth of embedment, Df = 4.422 m
iii) Width of foundation, B = 3.4 m Option 1
iv) Length of foundation, L = 1 m
v) Depth of groundwater table, Dw = 1.347 m below existing ground level
vi) Factor of Safety = 3

b) Properties of foundation soil beneath the foundation:

i) Effective shear strength, cf' = 5 kPa

ii) Effective angle of friction, ff' = 30 Degree
iii) Bulk unit weight of soil, gb = 20 kN/m3

Analysis Results
Bearing capacity factors (Vesic, Hansen, Meyerhof) calculated based on foundation soil properties:

Nq = 18.401 [ tan2(45+ff'/2)eptanff' ]
Nc = 30.140 [ (Nq-1)cotff' ]
Ng = 22.402 Vesic [ 2(Nq+1)tanff']
18.084 Hansen [ 1.8(Nq-1)tanff']
15.668 Meyerhof [ (Nq-1)tan(1.4ff') ]

q' = 58.27 [ gDw+g'(Df-Dw) ]

g bar = NA [ g'+(Dw-Df)(g-g')/B ]

For Df/B ratio, if B = then

3.4 1.301 >=1

Shape factor:
B= lqs = lcs = lgs =
3.4 2.963 3.076 -0.360

Depth factor: Inclination factor:

B= lqd = lcd = lgd = a = - (tan-1Fh/Fv)

3.4 1.264 1.366 1.000

Terzaghi Method General Method

qu qall qall
qu qu qall qall
B (Ng based (Ng based (Recommended
(Ng based (Ng based (Ng based (Ng based qu qall
on on )
on Vesic) on Hansen) on Vesic) on Hansen)
Meyerhof) Meyerhof)
3.4 1460.4 1536.3 1494.4 486.8 512.1 498.1 4510.29 1503.43 498.1
 Project Title Job No.
Sepakat Setia Perunding (Sdn) Bhd
Electrified Double Track SP3D
Serial No. Sheet No.
CALCULATION SHEET BC279
Calculation Title: Design Check Review Date
Allowable Bearing Capacity for Pad Footing TTC SFK CCS 26-09-18

DATA ENTRY
a) Dimensions of foundation:
Borehole Ref = 5DBH-118
i) Type of foundation = Strip qu=cNc+qNq+0.5gBNg
ii) Depth of embedment, Df = 3.399 m
iii) Width of foundation, B = 2.7 m Option 1
iv) Length of foundation, L = 1 m
v) Depth of groundwater table, Dw = 1.299 m below existing ground level
vi) Factor of Safety = 3

b) Properties of foundation soil beneath the foundation:

i) Effective shear strength, cf' = 5 kPa

ii) Effective angle of friction, ff' = 30 Degree
iii) Bulk unit weight of soil, gb = 20 kN/m3

Analysis Results
Bearing capacity factors (Vesic, Hansen, Meyerhof) calculated based on foundation soil properties:

Nq = 18.401 [ tan2(45+ff'/2)eptanff' ]
Nc = 30.140 [ (Nq-1)cotff' ]
Ng = 22.402 Vesic [ 2(Nq+1)tanff']
18.084 Hansen [ 1.8(Nq-1)tanff']
15.668 Meyerhof [ (Nq-1)tan(1.4ff') ]

q' = 47.38 [ gDw+g'(Df-Dw) ]

g bar = NA [ g'+(Dw-Df)(g-g')/B ]

For Df/B ratio, if B = then

2.7 1.259 >=1

Shape factor:
B= lqs = lcs = lgs =
2.7 2.559 2.648 -0.080

Depth factor: Inclination factor:

B= lqd = lcd = lgd = a = - (tan-1Fh/Fv)

2.7 1.260 1.360 1.000

Terzaghi Method General Method

qu qall qall
qu qu qall qall
B (Ng based (Ng based (Recommended
(Ng based (Ng based (Ng based (Ng based qu qall
on on )
on Vesic) on Hansen) on Vesic) on Hansen)
Meyerhof) Meyerhof)
2.7 1180.0 1271.3 1238.1 393.3 423.8 412.7 3328.21 1109.40 412.7
 Project Title Job No.
Sepakat Setia Perunding (Sdn) Bhd
Electrified Double Track SP3D
Serial No. Sheet No.
CALCULATION SHEET BC280
Calculation Title: Design Check Review Date
Allowable Bearing Capacity for Pad Footing TTC SFK CCS 26-09-18

DATA ENTRY
a) Dimensions of foundation:
Borehole Ref = 5DBH-119
i) Type of foundation = Strip qu=cNc+qNq+0.5gBNg
ii) Depth of embedment, Df = 10.541 m
iii) Width of foundation, B = 7.2 m Option 1
iv) Length of foundation, L = 1 m
v) Depth of groundwater table, Dw = 5.591 m below existing ground level
vi) Factor of Safety = 3

b) Properties of foundation soil beneath the foundation:

i) Effective shear strength, cf' = 5 kPa

ii) Effective angle of friction, ff' = 30 Degree
iii) Bulk unit weight of soil, gb = 20 kN/m3

Analysis Results
Bearing capacity factors (Vesic, Hansen, Meyerhof) calculated based on foundation soil properties:

Nq = 18.401 [ tan2(45+ff'/2)eptanff' ]
Nc = 30.140 [ (Nq-1)cotff' ]
Ng = 22.402 Vesic [ 2(Nq+1)tanff']
18.084 Hansen [ 1.8(Nq-1)tanff']
15.668 Meyerhof [ (Nq-1)tan(1.4ff') ]

q' = 162.26 [ gDw+g'(Df-Dw) ]

g bar = NA [ g'+(Dw-Df)(g-g')/B ]

For Df/B ratio, if B = then

7.2 1.464 >=1

Shape factor:
B= lqs = lcs = lgs =
7.2 5.157 5.396 -1.880

Depth factor: Inclination factor:

B= lqd = lcd = lgd = a = - (tan-1Fh/Fv)

7.2 1.280 1.389 1.000

Terzaghi Method General Method

qu qall qall
qu qu qall qall
B (Ng based (Ng based (Recommended
(Ng based (Ng based (Ng based (Ng based qu qall
on on )
on Vesic) on Hansen) on Vesic) on Hansen)
Meyerhof) Meyerhof)
7.2 3807.6 3799.9 3711.2 1269.2 1266.6 1237.1 19299.88 6433.29 1237.1
 Project Title Job No.
Sepakat Setia Perunding (Sdn) Bhd
Electrified Double Track SP3D
Serial No. Sheet No.
CALCULATION SHEET BC281
Calculation Title: Design Check Review Date
Allowable Bearing Capacity for Pad Footing TTC SFK CCS 26-09-18

DATA ENTRY
a) Dimensions of foundation:
Borehole Ref = 5DBH-122
i) Type of foundation = Strip qu=cNc+qNq+0.5gBNg
ii) Depth of embedment, Df = 9.224 m
iii) Width of foundation, B = 5.7 m Option 1
iv) Length of foundation, L = 1 m
v) Depth of groundwater table, Dw = 4.124 m below existing ground level
vi) Factor of Safety = 3

b) Properties of foundation soil beneath the foundation:

i) Effective shear strength, cf' = 5 kPa

ii) Effective angle of friction, ff' = 30 Degree
iii) Bulk unit weight of soil, gb = 20 kN/m3

Analysis Results
Bearing capacity factors (Vesic, Hansen, Meyerhof) calculated based on foundation soil properties:

Nq = 18.401 [ tan2(45+ff'/2)eptanff' ]
Nc = 30.140 [ (Nq-1)cotff' ]
Ng = 22.402 Vesic [ 2(Nq+1)tanff']
18.084 Hansen [ 1.8(Nq-1)tanff']
15.668 Meyerhof [ (Nq-1)tan(1.4ff') ]

q' = 134.45 [ gDw+g'(Df-Dw) ]

g bar = NA [ g'+(Dw-Df)(g-g')/B ]

For Df/B ratio, if B = then

5.7 1.618 >=1

Shape factor:
B= lqs = lcs = lgs =
5.7 4.291 4.480 -1.280

Depth factor: Inclination factor:

B= lqd = lcd = lgd = a = - (tan-1Fh/Fv)

5.7 1.294 1.407 1.000

Terzaghi Method General Method

qu qall qall
qu qu qall qall
B (Ng based (Ng based (Recommended
(Ng based (Ng based (Ng based (Ng based qu qall
on on )
on Vesic) on Hansen) on Vesic) on Hansen)
Meyerhof) Meyerhof)
5.7 3124.6 3149.9 3079.7 1041.5 1050.0 1026.6 13850.26 4616.75 1026.6
 Project Title Job No.
Sepakat Setia Perunding (Sdn) Bhd
Electrified Double Track SP3D
Serial No. Sheet No.
CALCULATION SHEET BC282
Calculation Title: Design Check Review Date
Allowable Bearing Capacity for Pad Footing TTC SFK CCS 26-09-18

DATA ENTRY
a) Dimensions of foundation:
Borehole Ref = 5DBH-123
i) Type of foundation = Strip qu=cNc+qNq+0.5gBNg
ii) Depth of embedment, Df = 3.419 m
iii) Width of foundation, B = 3 m Option 1
iv) Length of foundation, L = 1 m
v) Depth of groundwater table, Dw = 1.169 m below existing ground level
vi) Factor of Safety = 3

b) Properties of foundation soil beneath the foundation:

i) Effective shear strength, cf' = 5 kPa

ii) Effective angle of friction, ff' = 30 Degree
iii) Bulk unit weight of soil, gb = 20 kN/m3

Analysis Results
Bearing capacity factors (Vesic, Hansen, Meyerhof) calculated based on foundation soil properties:

Nq = 18.401 [ tan2(45+ff'/2)eptanff' ]
Nc = 30.140 [ (Nq-1)cotff' ]
Ng = 22.402 Vesic [ 2(Nq+1)tanff']
18.084 Hansen [ 1.8(Nq-1)tanff']
15.668 Meyerhof [ (Nq-1)tan(1.4ff') ]

q' = 46.31 [ gDw+g'(Df-Dw) ]

g bar = NA [ g'+(Dw-Df)(g-g')/B ]

For Df/B ratio, if B = then

3 1.140 >=1

Shape factor:
B= lqs = lcs = lgs =
3 2.732 2.832 -0.200

Depth factor: Inclination factor:

B= lqd = lcd = lgd = a = - (tan-1Fh/Fv)

3 1.246 1.340 1.000

Terzaghi Method General Method

qu qall qall
qu qu qall qall
B (Ng based (Ng based (Recommended
(Ng based (Ng based (Ng based (Ng based qu qall
on on )
on Vesic) on Hansen) on Vesic) on Hansen)
Meyerhof) Meyerhof)
3 1194.5 1279.2 1242.3 398.2 426.4 414.1 3403.04 1134.35 414.1
 Project Title Job No.
Sepakat Setia Perunding (Sdn) Bhd
Electrified Double Track SP3D
Serial No. Sheet No.
CALCULATION SHEET BC283
Calculation Title: Design Check Review Date
Allowable Bearing Capacity for Pad Footing TTC SFK CCS 26-09-18

DATA ENTRY
a) Dimensions of foundation:
Borehole Ref = 5DBH-124
i) Type of foundation = Strip qu=cNc+qNq+0.5gBNg
ii) Depth of embedment, Df = 12.599 m
iii) Width of foundation, B = 7.35 m Option 1
iv) Length of foundation, L = 1 m
v) Depth of groundwater table, Dw = 7.549 m below existing ground level
vi) Factor of Safety = 3

b) Properties of foundation soil beneath the foundation:

i) Effective shear strength, cf' = 5 kPa

ii) Effective angle of friction, ff' = 30 Degree
iii) Bulk unit weight of soil, gb = 20 kN/m3

Analysis Results
Bearing capacity factors (Vesic, Hansen, Meyerhof) calculated based on foundation soil properties:

Nq = 18.401 [ tan2(45+ff'/2)eptanff' ]
Nc = 30.140 [ (Nq-1)cotff' ]
Ng = 22.402 Vesic [ 2(Nq+1)tanff']
18.084 Hansen [ 1.8(Nq-1)tanff']
15.668 Meyerhof [ (Nq-1)tan(1.4ff') ]

q' = 202.44 [ gDw+g'(Df-Dw) ]

g bar = NA [ g'+(Dw-Df)(g-g')/B ]

For Df/B ratio, if B = then

7.35 1.714 >=1

Shape factor:
B= lqs = lcs = lgs =
7.35 5.244 5.487 -1.940

Depth factor: Inclination factor:

B= lqd = lcd = lgd = a = - (tan-1Fh/Fv)

7.35 1.301 1.417 1.000

Terzaghi Method General Method

qu qall qall
qu qu qall qall
B (Ng based (Ng based (Recommended
(Ng based (Ng based (Ng based (Ng based qu qall
on on )
on Vesic) on Hansen) on Vesic) on Hansen)
Meyerhof) Meyerhof)
7.35 4564.0 4553.0 4462.6 1521.3 1517.7 1487.5 24956.34 8318.78 1487.5
 Project Title Job No.
Sepakat Setia Perunding (Sdn) Bhd
Electrified Double Track SP3D
Serial No. Sheet No.
CALCULATION SHEET BC284
Calculation Title: Design Check Review Date
Allowable Bearing Capacity for Pad Footing TTC SFK CCS 26-09-18

DATA ENTRY
a) Dimensions of foundation:
Borehole Ref = 5DBH-127
i) Type of foundation = Strip qu=cNc+qNq+0.5gBNg
ii) Depth of embedment, Df = 6.606 m
iii) Width of foundation, B = 3.8 m Option 1
iv) Length of foundation, L = 1 m
v) Depth of groundwater table, Dw = 3.506 m below existing ground level
vi) Factor of Safety = 3

b) Properties of foundation soil beneath the foundation:

i) Effective shear strength, cf' = 5 kPa

ii) Effective angle of friction, ff' = 30 Degree
iii) Bulk unit weight of soil, gb = 20 kN/m3

Analysis Results
Bearing capacity factors (Vesic, Hansen, Meyerhof) calculated based on foundation soil properties:

Nq = 18.401 [ tan2(45+ff'/2)eptanff' ]
Nc = 30.140 [ (Nq-1)cotff' ]
Ng = 22.402 Vesic [ 2(Nq+1)tanff']
18.084 Hansen [ 1.8(Nq-1)tanff']
15.668 Meyerhof [ (Nq-1)tan(1.4ff') ]

q' = 101.71 [ gDw+g'(Df-Dw) ]

g bar = NA [ g'+(Dw-Df)(g-g')/B ]

For Df/B ratio, if B = then

3.8 1.738 >=1

Shape factor:
B= lqs = lcs = lgs =
3.8 3.194 3.320 -0.520

Depth factor: Inclination factor:

B= lqd = lcd = lgd = a = - (tan-1Fh/Fv)

3.8 1.303 1.420 1.000

Terzaghi Method General Method

qu qall qall
qu qu qall qall
B (Ng based (Ng based (Recommended
(Ng based (Ng based (Ng based (Ng based qu qall
on on )
on Vesic) on Hansen) on Vesic) on Hansen)
Meyerhof) Meyerhof)
3.8 2305.3 2372.4 2325.6 768.4 790.8 775.2 8272.08 2757.36 775.2
 Project Title Job No.
Sepakat Setia Perunding (Sdn) Bhd
Electrified Double Track SP3D
Serial No. Sheet No.
CALCULATION SHEET BC285
Calculation Title: Design Check Review Date
Allowable Bearing Capacity for Pad Footing TTC SFK CCS 26-09-18

DATA ENTRY
a) Dimensions of foundation:
Borehole Ref = 5DBH-130
i) Type of foundation = Strip qu=cNc+qNq+0.5gBNg
ii) Depth of embedment, Df = 5.569 m
iii) Width of foundation, B = 3.4 m Option 1
iv) Length of foundation, L = 1 m
v) Depth of groundwater table, Dw = 2.494 m below existing ground level
vi) Factor of Safety = 3

b) Properties of foundation soil beneath the foundation:

i) Effective shear strength, cf' = 5 kPa

ii) Effective angle of friction, ff' = 30 Degree
iii) Bulk unit weight of soil, gb = 20 kN/m3

Analysis Results
Bearing capacity factors (Vesic, Hansen, Meyerhof) calculated based on foundation soil properties:

Nq = 18.401 [ tan2(45+ff'/2)eptanff' ]
Nc = 30.140 [ (Nq-1)cotff' ]
Ng = 22.402 Vesic [ 2(Nq+1)tanff']
18.084 Hansen [ 1.8(Nq-1)tanff']
15.668 Meyerhof [ (Nq-1)tan(1.4ff') ]

q' = 81.21 [ gDw+g'(Df-Dw) ]

g bar = NA [ g'+(Dw-Df)(g-g')/B ]

For Df/B ratio, if B = then

3.4 1.638 >=1

Shape factor:
B= lqs = lcs = lgs =
3.4 2.963 3.076 -0.360

Depth factor: Inclination factor:

B= lqd = lcd = lgd = a = - (tan-1Fh/Fv)

3.4 1.295 1.409 1.000

Terzaghi Method General Method

qu qall qall
qu qu qall qall
B (Ng based (Ng based (Recommended
(Ng based (Ng based (Ng based (Ng based qu qall
on on )
on Vesic) on Hansen) on Vesic) on Hansen)
Meyerhof) Meyerhof)
3.4 1882.5 1958.4 1916.5 627.5 652.8 638.8 6248.65 2082.88 638.8
 Project Title Job No.
Sepakat Setia Perunding (Sdn) Bhd
Electrified Double Track SP3D
Serial No. Sheet No.
CALCULATION SHEET BC286
Calculation Title: Design Check Review Date
Allowable Bearing Capacity for Pad Footing TTC SFK CCS 26-09-18

DATA ENTRY
a) Dimensions of foundation:
Borehole Ref = 5DBH-131
i) Type of foundation = Strip qu=cNc+qNq+0.5gBNg
ii) Depth of embedment, Df = 4.112 m
iii) Width of foundation, B = 3.35 m Option 1
iv) Length of foundation, L = 1 m
v) Depth of groundwater table, Dw = 1.237 m below existing ground level
vi) Factor of Safety = 3

b) Properties of foundation soil beneath the foundation:

i) Effective shear strength, cf' = 5 kPa

ii) Effective angle of friction, ff' = 30 Degree
iii) Bulk unit weight of soil, gb = 20 kN/m3

Analysis Results
Bearing capacity factors (Vesic, Hansen, Meyerhof) calculated based on foundation soil properties:

Nq = 18.401 [ tan2(45+ff'/2)eptanff' ]
Nc = 30.140 [ (Nq-1)cotff' ]
Ng = 22.402 Vesic [ 2(Nq+1)tanff']
18.084 Hansen [ 1.8(Nq-1)tanff']
15.668 Meyerhof [ (Nq-1)tan(1.4ff') ]

q' = 54.04 [ gDw+g'(Df-Dw) ]

g bar = NA [ g'+(Dw-Df)(g-g')/B ]

For Df/B ratio, if B = then

3.35 1.227 >=1

Shape factor:
B= lqs = lcs = lgs =
3.35 2.934 3.045 -0.340

Depth factor: Inclination factor:

B= lqd = lcd = lgd = a = - (tan-1Fh/Fv)

3.35 1.256 1.355 1.000

Terzaghi Method General Method

qu qall qall
qu qu qall qall
B (Ng based (Ng based (Recommended
(Ng based (Ng based (Ng based (Ng based qu qall
on on )
on Vesic) on Hansen) on Vesic) on Hansen)
Meyerhof) Meyerhof)
3.35 1376.7 1453.7 1412.5 458.9 484.6 470.8 4156.42 1385.47 470.8
 Project Title Job No.
Sepakat Setia Perunding (Sdn) Bhd
Electrified Double Track SP3D
Serial No. Sheet No.
CALCULATION SHEET BC287
Calculation Title: Design Check Review Date
Allowable Bearing Capacity for Pad Footing TTC SFK CCS 26-09-18

DATA ENTRY
a) Dimensions of foundation:
Borehole Ref = 5DBH-132
i) Type of foundation = Strip qu=cNc+qNq+0.5gBNg
ii) Depth of embedment, Df = 3.114 m
iii) Width of foundation, B = 2.65 m Option 1
iv) Length of foundation, L = 1 m
v) Depth of groundwater table, Dw = 1.189 m below existing ground level
vi) Factor of Safety = 3

b) Properties of foundation soil beneath the foundation:

i) Effective shear strength, cf' = 5 kPa

ii) Effective angle of friction, ff' = 30 Degree
iii) Bulk unit weight of soil, gb = 20 kN/m3

Analysis Results
Bearing capacity factors (Vesic, Hansen, Meyerhof) calculated based on foundation soil properties:

Nq = 18.401 [ tan2(45+ff'/2)eptanff' ]
Nc = 30.140 [ (Nq-1)cotff' ]
Ng = 22.402 Vesic [ 2(Nq+1)tanff']
18.084 Hansen [ 1.8(Nq-1)tanff']
15.668 Meyerhof [ (Nq-1)tan(1.4ff') ]

q' = 43.40 [ gDw+g'(Df-Dw) ]

g bar = NA [ g'+(Dw-Df)(g-g')/B ]

For Df/B ratio, if B = then

2.65 1.175 >=1

Shape factor:
B= lqs = lcs = lgs =
2.65 2.530 2.618 -0.060

Depth factor: Inclination factor:

B= lqd = lcd = lgd = a = - (tan-1Fh/Fv)

2.65 1.250 1.346 1.000

Terzaghi Method General Method

qu qall qall
qu qu qall qall
B (Ng based (Ng based (Recommended
(Ng based (Ng based (Ng based (Ng based qu qall
on on )
on Vesic) on Hansen) on Vesic) on Hansen)
Meyerhof) Meyerhof)
2.65 1101.0 1193.4 1160.8 367.0 397.8 386.9 3038.14 1012.71 386.9
 Project Title Job No.
Sepakat Setia Perunding (Sdn) Bhd
Electrified Double Track SP3D
Serial No. Sheet No.
CALCULATION SHEET BC288
Calculation Title: Design Check Review Date
Allowable Bearing Capacity for Pad Footing TTC SFK CCS 26-09-18

DATA ENTRY
a) Dimensions of foundation:
Borehole Ref = 5DBH-135
i) Type of foundation = Strip qu=cNc+qNq+0.5gBNg
ii) Depth of embedment, Df = 6.113 m
iii) Width of foundation, B = 5.95 m Option 1
iv) Length of foundation, L = 1 m
v) Depth of groundwater table, Dw = 1.488 m below existing ground level
vi) Factor of Safety = 3

b) Properties of foundation soil beneath the foundation:

i) Effective shear strength, cf' = 5 kPa

ii) Effective angle of friction, ff' = 30 Degree
iii) Bulk unit weight of soil, gb = 20 kN/m3

Analysis Results
Bearing capacity factors (Vesic, Hansen, Meyerhof) calculated based on foundation soil properties:

Nq = 18.401 [ tan2(45+ff'/2)eptanff' ]
Nc = 30.140 [ (Nq-1)cotff' ]
Ng = 22.402 Vesic [ 2(Nq+1)tanff']
18.084 Hansen [ 1.8(Nq-1)tanff']
15.668 Meyerhof [ (Nq-1)tan(1.4ff') ]

q' = 76.89 [ gDw+g'(Df-Dw) ]

g bar = NA [ g'+(Dw-Df)(g-g')/B ]

For Df/B ratio, if B = then

5.95 1.027 >=1

Shape factor:
B= lqs = lcs = lgs =
5.95 4.435 4.633 -1.380

Depth factor: Inclination factor:

B= lqd = lcd = lgd = a = - (tan-1Fh/Fv)

5.95 1.231 1.320 1.000

Terzaghi Method General Method

qu qall qall
qu qu qall qall
B (Ng based (Ng based (Recommended
(Ng based (Ng based (Ng based (Ng based qu qall
on on )
on Vesic) on Hansen) on Vesic) on Hansen)
Meyerhof) Meyerhof)
5.95 2094.0 2113.8 2040.5 698.0 704.6 680.2 7706.37 2568.79 680.2
 APPENDIX I
BEARING CAPACITY CALCULATION FOR RETAINING
WALL
 Project Title SP3D Job No.
Sepakat Setia Perunding (Sdn) Bhd Design, Construction, Supply, Installation, Completion, Testing, Commisioning

and Maintenance Of Electrified Double Track From Gemas To Johor Bahru SP3D
Serial No. Sheet No.
CALCULATION SHEET B15-01
Calculation Title: Design Check Review Date
Allowable Bearing Capacity for Retaining Wall SHH SFK CCS 08-10-18

DATA ENTRY
a) Dimensions of foundation:
Borehole Ref = 5DBH-111
i) Type of foundation = Strip qu=cNc+qNq+0.5gBNg
ii) Depth of embedment, Df = 0.85 m
iii) Width of foundation, B = 4.800 m Option 1
iv) Length of foundation, L = 70.000 m
v) Depth of groundwater table, Dw = 0 m below existing ground level
vi) Factor of Safety = 3

b) Properties of foundation soil beneath the foundation:

i) Effective shear strength, cf' = 5 kPa

ii) Effective angle of friction, ff' = 30 Degree
iii) Bulk unit weight of soil, gb = 20 kN/m3

Analysis Results
Bearing capacity factors (Vesic, Hansen, Meyerhof) calculated based on foundation soil properties:

Nq = 18.401 [ tan2(45+ff'/2)eptanff' ]
Nc = 30.140 [ (Nq-1)cotff' ]
Ng = 22.402 Vesic [ 2(Nq+1)tanff']
15.070 Hansen [ 1.5(Nq-1)tanff']
15.668 Meyerhof [ (Nq-1)tan(1.4ff') ]

q' = 8.66 [ gDw+g'(Df-Dw) ]

g bar = NA [ g'+(Dw-Df)(g-g')/B ]

For Df/B ratio, if B = then

4.8 0.177 <=1

Shape factor:
B= lqs = lcs = lgs =
4.8 1.040 1.042 0.973

Depth factor: Inclination factor:

B= lqd = lcd = lgd = a = - (tan-1Fh/Fv)

4.8 1.051 1.071 1.000

Terzaghi Method General Method

qall qall
qu qu qu (Ng qall qall
B (Ng based (Recommend
(Ng based (Ng based based on (Ng based (Ng based qu qall
on ed)
on Vesic) on Hansen) Meyerhof) on Vesic) on Hansen)
Meyerhof)
4.8 707.3 678.6 693.3 235.8 226.2 231.1 875.14 291.71 230.0
 Project Title SP3D Job No.
Sepakat Setia Perunding (Sdn) Bhd Design, Construction, Supply, Installation, Completion, Testing, Commisioning

and Maintenance Of Electrified Double Track From Gemas To Johor Bahru SP3D
Serial No. Sheet No.
CALCULATION SHEET B15-02
Calculation Title: Design Check Review Date
Allowable Bearing Capacity for Retaining Wall SHH SFK CCS 08-10-18

DATA ENTRY
a) Dimensions of foundation:
Borehole Ref = 5DBH-111
i) Type of foundation = Strip qu=cNc+qNq+0.5gBNg
ii) Depth of embedment, Df = 1 m
iii) Width of foundation, B = 3.975 m Option 1
iv) Length of foundation, L = 225.000 m
v) Depth of groundwater table, Dw = 0 m below existing ground level
vi) Factor of Safety = 3

b) Properties of foundation soil beneath the foundation:

i) Effective shear strength, cf' = 5 kPa

ii) Effective angle of friction, ff' = 30 Degree
iii) Bulk unit weight of soil, gb = 20 kN/m3

Analysis Results
Bearing capacity factors (Vesic, Hansen, Meyerhof) calculated based on foundation soil properties:

Nq = 18.401 [ tan2(45+ff'/2)eptanff' ]
Nc = 30.140 [ (Nq-1)cotff' ]
Ng = 22.402 Vesic [ 2(Nq+1)tanff']
15.070 Hansen [ 1.5(Nq-1)tanff']
15.668 Meyerhof [ (Nq-1)tan(1.4ff') ]

q' = 10.19 [ gDw+g'(Df-Dw) ]

g bar = NA [ g'+(Dw-Df)(g-g')/B ]

For Df/B ratio, if B = then

3.975 0.252 <=1

Shape factor:
B= lqs = lcs = lgs =
3.975 1.010 1.011 0.993

Depth factor: Inclination factor:

B= lqd = lcd = lgd = a = - (tan-1Fh/Fv)

3.975 1.073 1.101 1.000

Terzaghi Method General Method

qall qall
qu qu qu (Ng qall qall
B (Ng based (Recommend
(Ng based (Ng based based on (Ng based (Ng based qu qall
on ed)
on Vesic) on Hansen) Meyerhof) on Vesic) on Hansen)
Meyerhof)
3.975 641.2 643.4 655.5 213.7 214.5 218.5 821.33 273.78 215.0
 Project Title SP3D Job No.
Sepakat Setia Perunding (Sdn) Bhd Design, Construction, Supply, Installation, Completion, Testing, Commisioning

and Maintenance Of Electrified Double Track From Gemas To Johor Bahru SP3D
Serial No. Sheet No.
CALCULATION SHEET B15-03
Calculation Title: Design Check Review Date
Allowable Bearing Capacity for Retaining Wall SHH SFK CCS 08-10-18

DATA ENTRY
a) Dimensions of foundation:
Borehole Ref = 5DBH-112
i) Type of foundation = Strip qu=cNc+qNq+0.5gBNg
ii) Depth of embedment, Df = 0.85 m
iii) Width of foundation, B = 4.800 m Option 1
iv) Length of foundation, L = 55.000 m
v) Depth of groundwater table, Dw = 0 m below existing ground level
vi) Factor of Safety = 3

b) Properties of foundation soil beneath the foundation:

i) Effective shear strength, cf' = 5 kPa

ii) Effective angle of friction, ff' = 30 Degree
iii) Bulk unit weight of soil, gb = 20 kN/m3

Analysis Results
Bearing capacity factors (Vesic, Hansen, Meyerhof) calculated based on foundation soil properties:

Nq = 18.401 [ tan2(45+ff'/2)eptanff' ]
Nc = 30.140 [ (Nq-1)cotff' ]
Ng = 22.402 Vesic [ 2(Nq+1)tanff']
15.070 Hansen [ 1.5(Nq-1)tanff']
15.668 Meyerhof [ (Nq-1)tan(1.4ff') ]

q' = 8.66 [ gDw+g'(Df-Dw) ]

g bar = NA [ g'+(Dw-Df)(g-g')/B ]

For Df/B ratio, if B = then

4.8 0.177 <=1

Shape factor:
B= lqs = lcs = lgs =
4.8 1.050 1.053 0.965

Depth factor: Inclination factor:

B= lqd = lcd = lgd = a = - (tan-1Fh/Fv)

4.8 1.051 1.071 1.000

Terzaghi Method General Method

qall qall
qu qu qu (Ng qall qall
B (Ng based (Recommend
(Ng based (Ng based based on (Ng based (Ng based qu qall
on ed)
on Vesic) on Hansen) Meyerhof) on Vesic) on Hansen)
Meyerhof)
4.8 707.3 678.6 693.3 235.8 226.2 231.1 874.69 291.56 230.0
 Project Title SP3D Job No.
Sepakat Setia Perunding (Sdn) Bhd Design, Construction, Supply, Installation, Completion, Testing, Commisioning

and Maintenance Of Electrified Double Track From Gemas To Johor Bahru SP3D
Serial No. Sheet No.
CALCULATION SHEET B15-04
Calculation Title: Design Check Review Date
Allowable Bearing Capacity for Retaining Wall SHH SFK CCS 08-10-18

DATA ENTRY
a) Dimensions of foundation:
Borehole Ref = 5DBH-119
i) Type of foundation = Strip qu=cNc+qNq+0.5gBNg
ii) Depth of embedment, Df = 0.75 m
iii) Width of foundation, B = 3.950 m Option 1
iv) Length of foundation, L = 60.000 m
v) Depth of groundwater table, Dw = 0 m below existing ground level
vi) Factor of Safety = 3

b) Properties of foundation soil beneath the foundation:

i) Effective shear strength, cf' = 5 kPa

ii) Effective angle of friction, ff' = 30 Degree
iii) Bulk unit weight of soil, gb = 20 kN/m3

Analysis Results
Bearing capacity factors (Vesic, Hansen, Meyerhof) calculated based on foundation soil properties:

Nq = 18.401 [ tan2(45+ff'/2)eptanff' ]
Nc = 30.140 [ (Nq-1)cotff' ]
Ng = 22.402 Vesic [ 2(Nq+1)tanff']
15.070 Hansen [ 1.5(Nq-1)tanff']
15.668 Meyerhof [ (Nq-1)tan(1.4ff') ]

q' = 7.64 [ gDw+g'(Df-Dw) ]

g bar = NA [ g'+(Dw-Df)(g-g')/B ]

For Df/B ratio, if B = then

3.95 0.190 <=1

Shape factor:
B= lqs = lcs = lgs =
3.95 1.038 1.040 0.974

Depth factor: Inclination factor:

B= lqd = lcd = lgd = a = - (tan-1Fh/Fv)

3.95 1.055 1.076 1.000

Terzaghi Method General Method

qall qall
qu qu qu (Ng qall qall
B (Ng based (Recommend
(Ng based (Ng based based on (Ng based (Ng based qu qall
on ed)
on Vesic) on Hansen) Meyerhof) on Vesic) on Hansen)
Meyerhof)
3.95 591.5 594.6 606.7 197.2 198.2 202.2 761.62 253.87 200.0
 Project Title SP3D Job No.
Sepakat Setia Perunding (Sdn) Bhd Design, Construction, Supply, Installation, Completion, Testing, Commisioning

and Maintenance Of Electrified Double Track From Gemas To Johor Bahru SP3D
Serial No. Sheet No.
CALCULATION SHEET B15-05
Calculation Title: Design Check Review Date
Allowable Bearing Capacity for Retaining Wall SHH SFK CCS 08-10-18

DATA ENTRY
a) Dimensions of foundation:
Borehole Ref = 5DBH-120
i) Type of foundation = Strip qu=cNc+qNq+0.5gBNg
ii) Depth of embedment, Df = 1 m
iii) Width of foundation, B = 2.625 m Option 1
iv) Length of foundation, L = 100.000 m
v) Depth of groundwater table, Dw = 0 m below existing ground level
vi) Factor of Safety = 3

b) Properties of foundation soil beneath the foundation:

i) Effective shear strength, cf' = 5 kPa

ii) Effective angle of friction, ff' = 30 Degree
iii) Bulk unit weight of soil, gb = 20 kN/m3

Analysis Results
Bearing capacity factors (Vesic, Hansen, Meyerhof) calculated based on foundation soil properties:

Nq = 18.401 [ tan2(45+ff'/2)eptanff' ]
Nc = 30.140 [ (Nq-1)cotff' ]
Ng = 22.402 Vesic [ 2(Nq+1)tanff']
15.070 Hansen [ 1.5(Nq-1)tanff']
15.668 Meyerhof [ (Nq-1)tan(1.4ff') ]

q' = 10.19 [ gDw+g'(Df-Dw) ]

g bar = NA [ g'+(Dw-Df)(g-g')/B ]

For Df/B ratio, if B = then

2.625 0.381 <=1

Shape factor:
B= lqs = lcs = lgs =
2.625 1.015 1.016 0.990

Depth factor: Inclination factor:

B= lqd = lcd = lgd = a = - (tan-1Fh/Fv)

2.625 1.110 1.152 1.000

Terzaghi Method General Method

qall qall
qu qu qu (Ng qall qall
B (Ng based (Recommend
(Ng based (Ng based based on (Ng based (Ng based qu qall
on ed)
on Vesic) on Hansen) Meyerhof) on Vesic) on Hansen)
Meyerhof)
2.625 487.1 539.8 547.8 162.4 179.9 182.6 684.20 228.07 180.0
 Project Title SP3D Job No.
Sepakat Setia Perunding (Sdn) Bhd Design, Construction, Supply, Installation, Completion, Testing, Commisioning

and Maintenance Of Electrified Double Track From Gemas To Johor Bahru SP3D
Serial No. Sheet No.
CALCULATION SHEET B15-06
Calculation Title: Design Check Review Date
Allowable Bearing Capacity for Retaining Wall SHH SFK CCS 08-10-18

DATA ENTRY
a) Dimensions of foundation:
Borehole Ref = 5DBH-120
i) Type of foundation = Strip qu=cNc+qNq+0.5gBNg
ii) Depth of embedment, Df = 0.75 m
iii) Width of foundation, B = 3.600 m Option 1
iv) Length of foundation, L = 35.000 m
v) Depth of groundwater table, Dw = 0 m below existing ground level
vi) Factor of Safety = 3

b) Properties of foundation soil beneath the foundation:

i) Effective shear strength, cf' = 5 kPa

ii) Effective angle of friction, ff' = 30 Degree
iii) Bulk unit weight of soil, gb = 20 kN/m3

Analysis Results
Bearing capacity factors (Vesic, Hansen, Meyerhof) calculated based on foundation soil properties:

Nq = 18.401 [ tan2(45+ff'/2)eptanff' ]
Nc = 30.140 [ (Nq-1)cotff' ]
Ng = 22.402 Vesic [ 2(Nq+1)tanff']
15.070 Hansen [ 1.5(Nq-1)tanff']
15.668 Meyerhof [ (Nq-1)tan(1.4ff') ]

q' = 7.64 [ gDw+g'(Df-Dw) ]

g bar = NA [ g'+(Dw-Df)(g-g')/B ]

For Df/B ratio, if B = then

3.6 0.208 <=1

Shape factor:
B= lqs = lcs = lgs =
3.6 1.059 1.063 0.959

Depth factor: Inclination factor:

B= lqd = lcd = lgd = a = - (tan-1Fh/Fv)

3.6 1.060 1.083 1.000

Terzaghi Method General Method

qall qall
qu qu qu (Ng qall qall
B (Ng based (Recommend
(Ng based (Ng based based on (Ng based (Ng based qu qall
on ed)
on Vesic) on Hansen) Meyerhof) on Vesic) on Hansen)
Meyerhof)
3.6 551.5 567.7 578.7 183.8 189.2 192.9 725.45 241.82 190.0
 Project Title SP3D Job No.
Sepakat Setia Perunding (Sdn) Bhd Design, Construction, Supply, Installation, Completion, Testing, Commisioning

and Maintenance Of Electrified Double Track From Gemas To Johor Bahru SP3D
Serial No. Sheet No.
CALCULATION SHEET B15-07
Calculation Title: Design Check Review Date
Allowable Bearing Capacity for Retaining Wall SHH SFK CCS 08-10-18

DATA ENTRY
a) Dimensions of foundation:
Borehole Ref = 5DBH-122
i) Type of foundation = Strip qu=cNc+qNq+0.5gBNg
ii) Depth of embedment, Df = 0.65 m
iii) Width of foundation, B = 2.450 m Option 1
iv) Length of foundation, L = 20.000 m
v) Depth of groundwater table, Dw = 0 m below existing ground level
vi) Factor of Safety = 3

b) Properties of foundation soil beneath the foundation:

i) Effective shear strength, cf' = 5 kPa

ii) Effective angle of friction, ff' = 30 Degree
iii) Bulk unit weight of soil, gb = 20 kN/m3

Analysis Results
Bearing capacity factors (Vesic, Hansen, Meyerhof) calculated based on foundation soil properties:

Nq = 18.401 [ tan2(45+ff'/2)eptanff' ]
Nc = 30.140 [ (Nq-1)cotff' ]
Ng = 22.402 Vesic [ 2(Nq+1)tanff']
15.070 Hansen [ 1.5(Nq-1)tanff']
15.668 Meyerhof [ (Nq-1)tan(1.4ff') ]

q' = 6.62 [ gDw+g'(Df-Dw) ]

g bar = NA [ g'+(Dw-Df)(g-g')/B ]

For Df/B ratio, if B = then

2.45 0.265 <=1

Shape factor:
B= lqs = lcs = lgs =
2.45 1.071 1.075 0.951

Depth factor: Inclination factor:

B= lqd = lcd = lgd = a = - (tan-1Fh/Fv)

2.45 1.077 1.106 1.000

Terzaghi Method General Method

qall qall
qu qu qu (Ng qall qall
B (Ng based (Recommend
(Ng based (Ng based based on (Ng based (Ng based qu qall
on ed)
on Vesic) on Hansen) Meyerhof) on Vesic) on Hansen)
Meyerhof)
2.45 401.5 460.7 468.2 133.8 153.6 156.1 585.59 195.20 155.0
 Project Title SP3D Job No.
Sepakat Setia Perunding (Sdn) Bhd Design, Construction, Supply, Installation, Completion, Testing, Commisioning

and Maintenance Of Electrified Double Track From Gemas To Johor Bahru SP3D
Serial No. Sheet No.
CALCULATION SHEET B15-07a
Calculation Title: Design Check Review Date
Allowable Bearing Capacity for Retaining Wall SHH SFK CCS 08-10-18

DATA ENTRY
a) Dimensions of foundation:
Borehole Ref =
i) Type of foundation = Strip qu=cNc+qNq+0.5gBNg
ii) Depth of embedment, Df = 0.65 m
iii) Width of foundation, B = 2.450 m Option 1
iv) Length of foundation, L = 30.000 m
v) Depth of groundwater table, Dw = 0 m below existing ground level
vi) Factor of Safety = 3

b) Properties of foundation soil beneath the foundation:

i) Effective shear strength, cf' = 5 kPa

ii) Effective angle of friction, ff' = 30 Degree
iii) Bulk unit weight of soil, gb = 20 kN/m3

Analysis Results
Bearing capacity factors (Vesic, Hansen, Meyerhof) calculated based on foundation soil properties:

Nq = 18.401 [ tan2(45+ff'/2)eptanff' ]
Nc = 30.140 [ (Nq-1)cotff' ]
Ng = 22.402 Vesic [ 2(Nq+1)tanff']
15.070 Hansen [ 1.5(Nq-1)tanff']
15.668 Meyerhof [ (Nq-1)tan(1.4ff') ]

q' = 6.62 [ gDw+g'(Df-Dw) ]

g bar = NA [ g'+(Dw-Df)(g-g')/B ]

For Df/B ratio, if B = then

2.45 0.265 <=1

Shape factor:
B= lqs = lcs = lgs =
2.45 1.047 1.050 0.967

Depth factor: Inclination factor:

B= lqd = lcd = lgd = a = - (tan-1Fh/Fv)

2.45 1.077 1.106 1.000

Terzaghi Method General Method

qall qall
qu qu qu (Ng qall qall
B (Ng based (Recommend
(Ng based (Ng based based on (Ng based (Ng based qu qall
on ed)
on Vesic) on Hansen) Meyerhof) on Vesic) on Hansen)
Meyerhof)
2.45 401.5 460.7 468.2 133.8 153.6 156.1 582.91 194.30 155.0
 Project Title SP3D Job No.
Sepakat Setia Perunding (Sdn) Bhd Design, Construction, Supply, Installation, Completion, Testing, Commisioning

and Maintenance Of Electrified Double Track From Gemas To Johor Bahru SP3D
Serial No. Sheet No.
CALCULATION SHEET B15-08
Calculation Title: Design Check Review Date
Allowable Bearing Capacity for Retaining Wall SHH SFK CCS 08-10-18

DATA ENTRY
a) Dimensions of foundation:
Borehole Ref = ABH-141
i) Type of foundation = Strip qu=cNc+qNq+0.5gBNg
ii) Depth of embedment, Df = 1 m
iii) Width of foundation, B = 4.125 m Option 1
iv) Length of foundation, L = 150.000 m
v) Depth of groundwater table, Dw = 0 m below existing ground level
vi) Factor of Safety = 3

b) Properties of foundation soil beneath the foundation:

i) Effective shear strength, cf' = 5 kPa

ii) Effective angle of friction, ff' = 30 Degree
iii) Bulk unit weight of soil, gb = 20 kN/m3

Analysis Results
Bearing capacity factors (Vesic, Hansen, Meyerhof) calculated based on foundation soil properties:

Nq = 18.401 [ tan2(45+ff'/2)eptanff' ]
Nc = 30.140 [ (Nq-1)cotff' ]
Ng = 22.402 Vesic [ 2(Nq+1)tanff']
15.070 Hansen [ 1.5(Nq-1)tanff']
15.668 Meyerhof [ (Nq-1)tan(1.4ff') ]

q' = 10.19 [ gDw+g'(Df-Dw) ]

g bar = NA [ g'+(Dw-Df)(g-g')/B ]

For Df/B ratio, if B = then

4.125 0.242 <=1

Shape factor:
B= lqs = lcs = lgs =
4.125 1.016 1.017 0.989

Depth factor: Inclination factor:

B= lqd = lcd = lgd = a = - (tan-1Fh/Fv)

4.125 1.070 1.097 1.000

Terzaghi Method General Method

qall qall
qu qu qu (Ng qall qall
B (Ng based (Recommend
(Ng based (Ng based based on (Ng based (Ng based qu qall
on ed)
on Vesic) on Hansen) Meyerhof) on Vesic) on Hansen)
Meyerhof)
4.125 658.3 654.9 667.5 219.4 218.3 222.5 837.55 279.18 220.0
 Project Title SP3D Job No.
Sepakat Setia Perunding (Sdn) Bhd Design, Construction, Supply, Installation, Completion, Testing, Commisioning

and Maintenance Of Electrified Double Track From Gemas To Johor Bahru SP3D
Serial No. Sheet No.
CALCULATION SHEET B15-09
Calculation Title: Design Check Review Date
Allowable Bearing Capacity for Retaining Wall SHH SFK CCS 08-10-18

DATA ENTRY
a) Dimensions of foundation:
Borehole Ref = 5DBH-128
i) Type of foundation = Strip qu=cNc+qNq+0.5gBNg
ii) Depth of embedment, Df = 1 m
iii) Width of foundation, B = 3.000 m Option 1
iv) Length of foundation, L = 30.000 m
v) Depth of groundwater table, Dw = 0 m below existing ground level
vi) Factor of Safety = 3

b) Properties of foundation soil beneath the foundation:

i) Effective shear strength, cf' = 5 kPa

ii) Effective angle of friction, ff' = 30 Degree
iii) Bulk unit weight of soil, gb = 20 kN/m3

Analysis Results
Bearing capacity factors (Vesic, Hansen, Meyerhof) calculated based on foundation soil properties:

Nq = 18.401 [ tan2(45+ff'/2)eptanff' ]
Nc = 30.140 [ (Nq-1)cotff' ]
Ng = 22.402 Vesic [ 2(Nq+1)tanff']
15.070 Hansen [ 1.5(Nq-1)tanff']
15.668 Meyerhof [ (Nq-1)tan(1.4ff') ]

q' = 10.19 [ gDw+g'(Df-Dw) ]

g bar = NA [ g'+(Dw-Df)(g-g')/B ]

For Df/B ratio, if B = then

3 0.333 <=1

Shape factor:
B= lqs = lcs = lgs =
3 1.058 1.061 0.960

Depth factor: Inclination factor:

B= lqd = lcd = lgd = a = - (tan-1Fh/Fv)

3 1.096 1.133 1.000

Terzaghi Method General Method

qall qall
qu qu qu (Ng qall qall
B (Ng based (Recommend
(Ng based (Ng based based on (Ng based (Ng based qu qall
on ed)
on Vesic) on Hansen) Meyerhof) on Vesic) on Hansen)
Meyerhof)
3 529.9 568.5 577.7 176.6 189.5 192.6 727.36 242.45 190.0
 Project Title SP3D Job No.
Sepakat Setia Perunding (Sdn) Bhd Design, Construction, Supply, Installation, Completion, Testing, Commisioning

and Maintenance Of Electrified Double Track From Gemas To Johor Bahru SP3D
Serial No. Sheet No.
CALCULATION SHEET B15-10
Calculation Title: Design Check Review Date
Allowable Bearing Capacity for Retaining Wall SHH SFK CCS 08-10-18

DATA ENTRY
a) Dimensions of foundation:
Borehole Ref = 5DBH-130
i) Type of foundation = Strip qu=cNc+qNq+0.5gBNg
ii) Depth of embedment, Df = 0.65 m
iii) Width of foundation, B = 2.450 m Option 1
iv) Length of foundation, L = 12.000 m
v) Depth of groundwater table, Dw = 0 m below existing ground level
vi) Factor of Safety = 3

b) Properties of foundation soil beneath the foundation:

i) Effective shear strength, cf' = 5 kPa

ii) Effective angle of friction, ff' = 30 Degree
iii) Bulk unit weight of soil, gb = 20 kN/m3

Analysis Results
Bearing capacity factors (Vesic, Hansen, Meyerhof) calculated based on foundation soil properties:

Nq = 18.401 [ tan2(45+ff'/2)eptanff' ]
Nc = 30.140 [ (Nq-1)cotff' ]
Ng = 22.402 Vesic [ 2(Nq+1)tanff']
15.070 Hansen [ 1.5(Nq-1)tanff']
15.668 Meyerhof [ (Nq-1)tan(1.4ff') ]

q' = 6.62 [ gDw+g'(Df-Dw) ]

g bar = NA [ g'+(Dw-Df)(g-g')/B ]

For Df/B ratio, if B = then

2.45 0.265 <=1

Shape factor:
B= lqs = lcs = lgs =
2.45 1.118 1.125 0.918

Depth factor: Inclination factor:

B= lqd = lcd = lgd = a = - (tan-1Fh/Fv)

2.45 1.077 1.106 1.000

Terzaghi Method General Method

qall qall
qu qu qu (Ng qall qall
B (Ng based (Recommend
(Ng based (Ng based based on (Ng based (Ng based qu qall
on ed)
on Vesic) on Hansen) Meyerhof) on Vesic) on Hansen)
Meyerhof)
2.45 401.5 460.7 468.2 133.8 153.6 156.1 590.96 196.99 155.0
 Project Title SP3D Job No.
Sepakat Setia Perunding (Sdn) Bhd Design, Construction, Supply, Installation, Completion, Testing, Commisioning

and Maintenance Of Electrified Double Track From Gemas To Johor Bahru SP3D
Serial No. Sheet No.
CALCULATION SHEET B15-11
Calculation Title: Design Check Review Date
Allowable Bearing Capacity for Retaining Wall SHH SFK CCS 08-10-18

DATA ENTRY
a) Dimensions of foundation:
Borehole Ref = ABH-142
i) Type of foundation = Strip qu=cNc+qNq+0.5gBNg
ii) Depth of embedment, Df = 1 m
iii) Width of foundation, B = 3.000 m Option 1
iv) Length of foundation, L = 175.000 m
v) Depth of groundwater table, Dw = 0 m below existing ground level
vi) Factor of Safety = 3

b) Properties of foundation soil beneath the foundation:

i) Effective shear strength, cf' = 5 kPa

ii) Effective angle of friction, ff' = 30 Degree
iii) Bulk unit weight of soil, gb = 20 kN/m3

Analysis Results
Bearing capacity factors (Vesic, Hansen, Meyerhof) calculated based on foundation soil properties:

Nq = 18.401 [ tan2(45+ff'/2)eptanff' ]
Nc = 30.140 [ (Nq-1)cotff' ]
Ng = 22.402 Vesic [ 2(Nq+1)tanff']
15.070 Hansen [ 1.5(Nq-1)tanff']
15.668 Meyerhof [ (Nq-1)tan(1.4ff') ]

q' = 10.19 [ gDw+g'(Df-Dw) ]

g bar = NA [ g'+(Dw-Df)(g-g')/B ]

For Df/B ratio, if B = then

3 0.333 <=1

Shape factor:
B= lqs = lcs = lgs =
3 1.010 1.010 0.993

Depth factor: Inclination factor:

B= lqd = lcd = lgd = a = - (tan-1Fh/Fv)

3 1.096 1.133 1.000

Terzaghi Method General Method

qall qall
qu qu qu (Ng qall qall
B (Ng based (Recommend
(Ng based (Ng based based on (Ng based (Ng based qu qall
on ed)
on Vesic) on Hansen) Meyerhof) on Vesic) on Hansen)
Meyerhof)
3 529.9 568.5 577.7 176.6 189.5 192.6 720.24 240.08 190.0
 Project Title SP3D Job No.
Sepakat Setia Perunding (Sdn) Bhd Design, Construction, Supply, Installation, Completion, Testing, Commisioning

and Maintenance Of Electrified Double Track From Gemas To Johor Bahru SP3D
Serial No. Sheet No.
CALCULATION SHEET B15-12
Calculation Title: Design Check Review Date
Allowable Bearing Capacity for Retaining Wall SHH SFK CCS 08-10-18

DATA ENTRY
a) Dimensions of foundation:
Borehole Ref = ABH-143
i) Type of foundation = Strip qu=cNc+qNq+0.5gBNg
ii) Depth of embedment, Df = 1 m
iii) Width of foundation, B = 2.625 m Option 1
iv) Length of foundation, L = 170.000 m
v) Depth of groundwater table, Dw = 0 m below existing ground level
vi) Factor of Safety = 3

b) Properties of foundation soil beneath the foundation:

i) Effective shear strength, cf' = 5 kPa

ii) Effective angle of friction, ff' = 30 Degree
iii) Bulk unit weight of soil, gb = 20 kN/m3

Analysis Results
Bearing capacity factors (Vesic, Hansen, Meyerhof) calculated based on foundation soil properties:

Nq = 18.401 [ tan2(45+ff'/2)eptanff' ]
Nc = 30.140 [ (Nq-1)cotff' ]
Ng = 22.402 Vesic [ 2(Nq+1)tanff']
15.070 Hansen [ 1.5(Nq-1)tanff']
15.668 Meyerhof [ (Nq-1)tan(1.4ff') ]

q' = 10.19 [ gDw+g'(Df-Dw) ]

g bar = NA [ g'+(Dw-Df)(g-g')/B ]

For Df/B ratio, if B = then

2.625 0.381 <=1

Shape factor:
B= lqs = lcs = lgs =
2.625 1.009 1.009 0.994

Depth factor: Inclination factor:

B= lqd = lcd = lgd = a = - (tan-1Fh/Fv)

2.625 1.110 1.152 1.000

Terzaghi Method General Method

qall qall
qu qu qu (Ng qall qall
B (Ng based (Recommend
(Ng based (Ng based based on (Ng based (Ng based qu qall
on ed)
on Vesic) on Hansen) Meyerhof) on Vesic) on Hansen)
Meyerhof)
2.625 487.1 539.8 547.8 162.4 179.9 182.6 683.05 227.68 180.0
 Project Title SP3D Job No.
Sepakat Setia Perunding (Sdn) Bhd Design, Construction, Supply, Installation, Completion, Testing, Commisioning

and Maintenance Of Electrified Double Track From Gemas To Johor Bahru SP3D
Serial No. Sheet No.
CALCULATION SHEET B15-13
Calculation Title: Design Check Review Date
Allowable Bearing Capacity for Retaining Wall SHH SFK CCS 08-10-18

DATA ENTRY
a) Dimensions of foundation:
Borehole Ref = ABH-143
i) Type of foundation = Strip qu=cNc+qNq+0.5gBNg
ii) Depth of embedment, Df = 0.75 m
iii) Width of foundation, B = 3.600 m Option 1
iv) Length of foundation, L = 40.000 m
v) Depth of groundwater table, Dw = 0 m below existing ground level
vi) Factor of Safety = 3

b) Properties of foundation soil beneath the foundation:

i) Effective shear strength, cf' = 5 kPa

ii) Effective angle of friction, ff' = 30 Degree
iii) Bulk unit weight of soil, gb = 20 kN/m3

Analysis Results
Bearing capacity factors (Vesic, Hansen, Meyerhof) calculated based on foundation soil properties:

Nq = 18.401 [ tan2(45+ff'/2)eptanff' ]
Nc = 30.140 [ (Nq-1)cotff' ]
Ng = 22.402 Vesic [ 2(Nq+1)tanff']
15.070 Hansen [ 1.5(Nq-1)tanff']
15.668 Meyerhof [ (Nq-1)tan(1.4ff') ]

q' = 7.64 [ gDw+g'(Df-Dw) ]

g bar = NA [ g'+(Dw-Df)(g-g')/B ]

For Df/B ratio, if B = then

3.6 0.208 <=1

Shape factor:
B= lqs = lcs = lgs =
3.6 1.052 1.055 0.964

Depth factor: Inclination factor:

B= lqd = lcd = lgd = a = - (tan-1Fh/Fv)

3.6 1.060 1.083 1.000

Terzaghi Method General Method

qall qall
qu qu qu (Ng qall qall
B (Ng based (Recommend
(Ng based (Ng based based on (Ng based (Ng based qu qall
on ed)
on Vesic) on Hansen) Meyerhof) on Vesic) on Hansen)
Meyerhof)
3.6 551.5 567.7 578.7 183.8 189.2 192.9 725.18 241.73 190.0
 Project Title SP3D Job No.
Sepakat Setia Perunding (Sdn) Bhd Design, Construction, Supply, Installation, Completion, Testing, Commisioning

and Maintenance Of Electrified Double Track From Gemas To Johor Bahru SP3D
Serial No. Sheet No.
CALCULATION SHEET B15-13a
Calculation Title: Design Check Review Date
Allowable Bearing Capacity for Retaining Wall SHH SFK CCS 08-10-18

DATA ENTRY
a) Dimensions of foundation:
Borehole Ref = 5DBH-136
i) Type of foundation = Strip qu=cNc+qNq+0.5gBNg
ii) Depth of embedment, Df = 1 m
iii) Width of foundation, B = 3.000 m Option 1
iv) Length of foundation, L = 45.000 m
v) Depth of groundwater table, Dw = 0 m below existing ground level
vi) Factor of Safety = 3

b) Properties of foundation soil beneath the foundation:

i) Effective shear strength, cf' = 5 kPa

ii) Effective angle of friction, ff' = 30 Degree
iii) Bulk unit weight of soil, gb = 20 kN/m3

Analysis Results
Bearing capacity factors (Vesic, Hansen, Meyerhof) calculated based on foundation soil properties:

Nq = 18.401 [ tan2(45+ff'/2)eptanff' ]
Nc = 30.140 [ (Nq-1)cotff' ]
Ng = 22.402 Vesic [ 2(Nq+1)tanff']
15.070 Hansen [ 1.5(Nq-1)tanff']
15.668 Meyerhof [ (Nq-1)tan(1.4ff') ]

q' = 10.19 [ gDw+g'(Df-Dw) ]

g bar = NA [ g'+(Dw-Df)(g-g')/B ]

For Df/B ratio, if B = then

3 0.333 <=1

Shape factor:
B= lqs = lcs = lgs =
3 1.038 1.041 0.973

Depth factor: Inclination factor:

B= lqd = lcd = lgd = a = - (tan-1Fh/Fv)

3 1.096 1.133 1.000

Terzaghi Method General Method

qall qall
qu qu qu (Ng qall qall
B (Ng based (Recommend
(Ng based (Ng based based on (Ng based (Ng based qu qall
on ed)
on Vesic) on Hansen) Meyerhof) on Vesic) on Hansen)
Meyerhof)
3 529.9 568.5 577.7 176.6 189.5 192.6 724.50 241.50 190.0
APPENDIX J
AMP Results
 Summary Of Mackintosh Probe Result
Chainage 746025 746050 746100 746150 746350 746400 746450 746500 746550 746600 747050 747100 747150
AMP 5AMP-273A 5AMP-273B 5AMP-273C 5AMP-274A 5AMP-274B 5AMP-274C 5AMP-275A 5AMP-275B 5AMP-275C 5AMP-277A 5AMP-277B 5AMP-277C 5AMP-278A 5AMP-278C 5AMP-279A 5AMP-279C 5AMP-280A 5AMP-280C 5AMP-281A 5AMP-281C 5AMP-282A 5AMP-282C 5AMP-283A 5AMP-283C 5AMP-284A 5AMP-284C 5AMP-285A 5AMP-285C 5AMP-286A 5AMP-286C
N: 637477 637482 637472 637498 637503 637493 637539 637545 637533 637577 637584 637570 637701 637693 637724 637715 637743 637734 637760 637751 637777 637767 637793 637784 637991 637984 638024 638016 638057 638049
E: 169371 169380 169363 169358 169367 169350 169330 169338 169322 169298 169305 169290 169142 169137 169097 169093 169051 169047 169004 169001 168957 168954 168910 168906 168509 168503 168471 168465 168433 168427
0.3 10 4 7 30 12 21 25 15 74 25 21 21 120 48 19 22 11 10 51 10 36 10 10 48 56 24 12 10 65 15
0.6 6 6 8 21 10 20 11 9 63 26 16 10 25 19 15 27 4 7 50 12 11 6 12 46 17 11 7 7 35 12
0.9 4 6 2 10 5 7 18 7 15 29 19 6 16 12 15 11 8 4 46 10 15 4 14 16 15 9 6 6 18 11
1.2 2 2 2 14 14 10 15 11 8 46 20 4 16 11 7 11 8 8 21 6 13 7 20 45 11 14 9 3 17 10
1.5 2 10 2 10 11 6 14 8 7 17 6 2 18 12 21 22 7 11 20 9 36 9 26 26 13 8 6 7 36 17
1.8 2 6 3 14 9 5 7 8 10 15 4 3 20 12 7 8 6 14 14 7 36 4 21 19 15 9 4 14 20 16
2.1 2 4 2 9 7 6 4 10 10 18 7 6 31 11 4 10 7 12 10 10 26 7 30 10 11 8 8 18 22 12
2.4 2 4 2 9 10 12 6 15 15 21 9 9 22 14 6 7 8 7 10 13 29 14 36 6 11 7 13 4 35 15
2.7 7 6 2 8 5 15 8 10 17 12 11 7 24 11 8 8 11 6 17 16 36 21 41 9 12 7 9 8 60 9
3.0 20 9 3 4 9 10 8 19 19 15 14 4 33 12 8 6 15 8 36 19 42 26 40 7 15 9 24 10 31 8
3.3 19 7 6 10 10 16 15 21 21 41 16 6 25 14 7 9 20 11 47 17 51 24 40 6 13 14 54 8 16 5
3.6 12 11 4 7 16 26 19 15 12 76 21 7 17 12 10 12 11 15 71 21 54 27 51 9 11 10 75 7 21 6
3.9 12 17 7 26 15 71 24 26 14 106 74 7 25 17 12 10 6 17 96 26 56 20 54 11 11 7 19 15 20 9
4.2 17 36 9 29 19 54 19 32 14 124 90 9 29 20 18 12 6 19 90 31 67 25 60 17 11 10 12 10 26 7
4.5 29 11 6 31 41 90 21 19 18 169 104 21 34 26 25 20 9 10 93 37 96 26 61 21 15 12 24 12 19 6
4.8 31 96 4 42 106 104 20 27 21 142 111 36 30 31 38 25 4 32 104 41 111 31 70 26 10 16 30 14 25 4
5.1 36 91 5 45 175 79 17 32 21 167 74 41 29 34 52 43 8 41 96 49 104 30 74 31 12 20 19 24 31 7
5.4
5.7
6.0
6.3
6.6
6.9
7.2
7.5
7.8
8.1
8.4
8.7
9.0
9.3
9.6
9.9
10.2
10.5
10.8
11.1
11.4
11.7
12.0
12.3
12.6
12.9
13.2
13.5
13.8
14.1
14.4
14.7
15.0
 Summary Of Mackintosh Probe Result
Chainage 747200 747250 747300 747350 747400 747650 747700 748250 748300 748525 748575 750050 750100 750150
AMP 5AMP-287A 5AMP-287C 5AMP-288A 5AMP-288C 5AMP-289A 5AMP-289C 5AMP-290A 5AMP-290C 5AMP-291A 5AMP-291C 5AMP-292A 5AMP-292C 5AMP-293A 5AMP-293C 5AMP-294A 5AMP-294B 5AMP-294C 5AMP-295A 5AMP-295B 5AMP-295C 5AMP-296A 5AMP-296C 5AMP-297A 5AMP-297B 5AMP-297C 5AMP-298A 5AMP-298C 5AMP-299A 5AMP-299C 5AMP-300A 5AMP-300C
N: 638089 638082 638122 638114 638155 638147 638187 638180 638220 638212 638381 638374 638410 638402 638615 638625 638606 638633 638640 638624 638742 638734 638771 638777 638766 639630 639622 639659 639651 639688 639680
E: 168396 168389 168358 168351 168320 168314 168282 168276 168244 168238 168053 168047 168013 168007 167505 167508 167501 167458 167461 167454 167262 167256 167221 167225 167217 166022 166016 165981 165975 165940 165935
0.3 29 21 22 40 26 120 14 15 45 5 22 10 20 22 31 20 20 21 12 40 39 48 110 71 40 27 70 50 21 4 7
0.6 30 20 62 75 30 91 26 24 13 7 32 16 22 43 26 24 15 20 17 41 8 15 112 20 20 29 30 31 15 2 10
0.9 34 24 24 92 31 97 21 19 13 7 15 21 37 40 21 20 17 24 20 36 7 10 44 14 21 15 24 15 11 3 6
1.2 21 10 30 54 45 19 20 18 15 18 7 26 24 5 20 26 20 26 26 21 12 9 70 10 10 7 19 12 11 4 6
1.5 26 16 70 46 29 24 21 10 15 11 24 46 19 22 26 30 26 29 21 24 4 8 81 12 17 33 18 11 17 4 4
1.8 29 14 24 53 36 18 26 8 26 12 27 79 24 50 30 24 21 31 36 27 3 8 36 14 25 48 20 12 10 2 3
2.1 30 14 32 41 85 20 29 8 15 19 28 34 35 85 36 20 20 36 41 36 10 6 42 16 24 51 25 10 9 3 4
2.4 31 20 24 30 96 24 31 11 17 22 15 200 18 76 42 16 26 41 42 41 5 7 51 26 20 27 27 9 12 4 10
2.7 30 16 30 30 90 15 36 15 15 15 41 23 90 51 14 29 40 40 42 4 4 40 21 24 57 30 10 11 4 4
3.0 26 14 19 24 104 19 40 19 14 18 37 147 101 50 19 31 26 46 51 11 11 26 71 36 58 34 12 5 6 5
3.3 10 17 24 15 111 24 41 21 11 24 82 200 200 42 21 36 29 51 54 13 15 15 74 41 48 42 8 4 3 7
3.6 12 20 15 19 176 12 26 19 11 15 200 40 26 42 31 54 60 15 19 36 29 42 34 47 7 3 6 4
3.9 14 21 19 24 186 15 37 24 14 11 47 31 51 151 60 64 20 10 42 37 51 42 30 6 2 7 6
4.2 10 26 18 18 200 15 51 20 15 14 76 36 54 76 76 70 28 19 71 42 54 20 35 9 6 4 9
4.5 17 29 27 19 21 96 18 13 19 91 42 61 91 91 96 20 30 70 51 60 35 42 11 4 6 7
4.8 20 31 42 27 24 94 21 17 21 95 51 76 94 41 101 24 21 101 67 54 47 53 10 4 9 6
5.1 26 36 50 40 39 90 32 20 18 96 54 91 87 21 142 32 23 75 91 42 53 76 12 7 4 6
5.4
5.7
6.0
6.3
6.6
6.9
7.2
7.5
7.8
8.1
8.4
8.7
9.0
9.3
9.6
9.9
10.2
10.5
10.8
11.1
11.4
11.7
12.0
12.3
12.6
12.9
13.2
13.5
13.8
14.1
14.4
14.7
15.0
 Summary Of Mackintosh Probe Result
Chainage 750200 750250 750425 750450 750500 750550 752450 752500 752550 752600 752650 752700 752750 752800 752825
AMP 5AMP-301A 5AMP-301C 5AMP-302A 5AMP-302C 5AMP-303A 5AMP-303C 5AMP-304A 5AMP-304C 5AMP-305A 5AMP-305C 5AMP-306A 5AMP-306C 5AMP-307A 5AMP-307C 5AMP-308A 5AMP-308C 5AMP-309A 5AMP-309C 5AMP-310A 5AMP-310C 5AMP-311A 5AMP-311C 5AMP-312A 5AMP-312C 5AMP-313A 5AMP-313C 5AMP-314A 5AMP-314C 5AMP-315A 5AMP-315C
N: 639717 639709 639746 639738 639848 639840 639862 639854 639891 639882 639918 639909 640063 640053 640059 640049 640056 640046 640052 640042 640049 640039 640045 640036 640042 640032 640039 640029 640037 640027
E: 165900 165894 165859 165853 165717 165711 165696 165691 165655 165649 165613 165608 163846 163847 163796 163797 163746 163747 163696 163697 163647 163647 163597 163597 163547 163547 163497 163498 163472 163473
0.3 12 18 39 36 30 20 16 16 15 35 45 4 20 6 4 6 15 6 8 6 7 9 7 41 31 9 71 11 20 6
0.6 16 20 21 14 10 30 18 18 21 28 15 7 21 4 6 9 14 4 6 4 11 14 11 20 42 6 42 10 21 9
0.9 20 16 31 21 16 14 20 17 30 16 11 9 26 7 7 7 10 7 7 7 14 10 10 31 40 4 31 6 20 7
1.2 12 8 40 8 4 5 20 16 31 18 12 6 20 4 9 4 12 9 9 5 12 12 12 36 20 7 26 9 16 4
1.5 16 18 32 24 9 7 6 10 15 15 8 9 19 3 4 6 6 6 11 7 10 10 15 42 10 9 20 7 14 6
1.8 14 17 43 37 11 8 6 18 25 12 11 7 12 6 4 6 9 6 10 11 13 6 17 51 12 6 10 4 20 6
2.1 19 18 117 42 12 8 8 10 10 8 8 4 14 9 6 7 7 4 12 12 14 7 21 54 14 4 12 6 21 7
2.4 16 10 172 90 6 10 7 7 11 10 12 6 10 7 6 9 11 9 14 14 17 4 26 50 10 7 14 9 26 9
2.7 32 38 200 126 8 6 5 10 10 10 11 6 10 4 4 11 14 14 10 10 24 9 31 71 6 9 10 7 31 11
3.0 40 39 200 5 11 5 8 6 15 10 7 14 6 7 17 17 10 17 11 20 14 30 42 9 11 16 11 36 10
3.3 49 24 6 19 6 17 9 35 10 4 10 6 9 21 21 12 26 12 26 12 24 51 7 10 17 10 42 12
3.6 44 37 15 15 7 13 13 15 7 9 17 7 11 28 20 17 21 14 24 17 29 60 11 12 26 12 51 14
3.9 48 45 10 8 16 8 16 21 9 11 21 9 17 31 26 20 30 19 31 25 31 76 14 14 31 17 50 17
4.2 51 48 8 11 41 19 12 15 11 21 26 11 21 36 31 26 31 21 42 37 42 70 12 17 42 20 64 26
4.5 54 48 75 15 12 25 6 31 10 170 21 17 26 47 47 21 42 26 51 42 51 42 17 26 26 21 70 31
4.8 76 53 86 26 21 19 9 96 14 101 29 26 51 51 96 26 51 31 60 51 60 29 21 31 21 26 75 30
5.1 62 76 79 43 34 30 7 95 17 143 31 31 42 50 90 29 50 47 42 76 71 42 20 42 24 31 71 41
5.4
5.7
6.0
6.3
6.6
6.9
7.2
7.5
7.8
8.1
8.4
8.7
9.0
9.3
9.6
9.9
10.2
10.5
10.8
11.1
11.4
11.7
12.0
12.3
12.6
12.9
13.2
13.5
13.8
14.1
14.4
14.7
15.0